Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is an intricate disorder that has a negative outlook, while surgical treatment is linked to increased mortality. Primary TR occurs due to a structural defect in the tricuspid valve (TV), while secondary TR is a more prevalent condition often associated with pulmonary hypertension, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. The use of specific surgical procedures to improve TR is limited in everyday clinical practice due to the heightened surgical risk and delayed patient presentation. The development of other transcatheter heart valve procedures has led to a significant increase in transcatheter TV operations, which can be attributed to certain technological advancements. This review aims to provide an updated overview of transcatheter TV procedures, available alternative therapies, and standards for patient selection. It will also highlight the current state of development in this field, which is characterized by rapid progress and numerous ongoing clinical trials.

暂无摘要。

A large proportion of patients referred for transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) will have the presence of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). In such patients, surgical correction of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) could potentially ameliorate CIED-induced TR; however, it carries inherent risks and frequently does not result in TR improvement. As multiple TTVI devices are in trial to gain regulatory approval, understanding which therapy is most appropriate among patients with a CIED is essential. This review centers on the nonsurgical treatment, including TLE and transcatheter tricuspid valve repair and replacement options, aimed at enhancing outcomes in patients with TR who also have concurrent CIEDs.

UNASSIGNED: Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) has recently emerged as a novel therapeutic approach for managing severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, surgical tricuspid valve replacement (STVR) continues to be the predominant treatment modality. There are limited comparative data on both procedures. This study aimed to compare clinical and echocardiographic outcomes between patients who underwent mini-thoracotomy transatrial LuX-Valve TTVR and those who underwent STVR.
UNASSIGNED: This study prospectively collected patients with severe TR who underwent TTVR (n = 29) or isolated STVR (n = 59) at Wuhan Union Hospital from 2019 to 2022. All TTVR patients received the LuX-Valve via a mini-thoracotomy and transatrial approach. The clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were compared at 30-day and one-year follow-ups.
UNASSIGNED: At baseline, patients with LuX-Valve TTVR had higher surgical risk scores and a greater proportion of right ventricular dysfunction compared with STVR. In the early postoperative period, the STVR group had a greater decrease in right ventricular function. Hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS, total procedure time, and tracheal intubation time were shorter in the TTVR than in the STVR group. The incidence of postoperative paravalvular leaks was higher among patients who underwent TTVR. Compared to the STVR group, the pacemaker implantation rate was lower in the TTVR group. During follow-up, the peak tricuspid valve velocity and mean gradient in the TTVR group were consistently lower than those in the STVR group. There was similar mortality between TTVR and STVR at 30-day and one-year follow-ups.
UNASSIGNED: The mini-thoracotomy transatria LuX-Valve TTVR has a higher incidence of paravalvular leaks and a lower rate of pacemaker implantation than STVR, with similar 30-day and one-year mortality rates. In some respects, mini-thoracotomy transatrial LuX-Valve TTVR may be a feasible and safe treatment option for specific populations, or it could potentially serve as an alternative therapy to supplement conventional STVR. Further follow-up is required to assess differences in long-term clinical outcomes and valve durability.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) offers the potential for improved outcomes for the significant number of patients with severe tricuspid valve regurgitation relative to current treatment options. Imaging is a critical component of the success of this procedure. Here we describe strategies and techniques for the use of 3-dimensional intracardiac echocardiography as an adjunct to standard transesophageal echocardiography during TTVR procedure.

BACKGROUND: Impaired hospitalizations for heart failure (HHF) and mortality are associated with tricuspid regurgitation (TR).
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the benefit of transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) over guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with symptomatic severe TR.
METHODS: Between May 2020 and April 2023, 88 patients with symptomatic severe TR were treated in our center. Of these, 57 patients received GDMT alone, and 31 patients underwent combined TTVR and GDMT. We collected and analyzed baseline data, and follow-up information for both groups. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and the combined endpoint (including all-cause mortality and HHF).
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 20 (IQR 10-29) months, significant improvements were shown in TR severity, right ventricular function, and dimensions in TTVR group (all P < 0.001). It also resulted in superior survival rates (75.8% vs. 48.4%, P = 0.019), improved freedom from combined endpoint (61.5% vs. 45.9%, P = 0.007) and fewer major adverse events. After stratification by TRI-SCORE, the subgroup with < 6 points in the TTVR group exhibited a significant difference in the combined endpoint compared to the other subgroups (all P < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed in the GDMT subgroups (P = 0.680).
CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of LuX-Valve in TTVR effectively improves TR and is associated with lower rates of major adverse events, HHF and all-cause mortality. The TRI-SCORE may help identify higher-benefit patients with TR from TTVR. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System (NCT02917980).

The emergence of percutaneous treatment options provides novel therapeutic alternatives for older and feeble patients who are at high risk for any surgical procedure. The purpose of our review was to offer an up-to-date analysis of the rapidly expanding field of percutaneous technologies for mitral, tricuspid, and pulmonary procedures. Edge-to-edge repair is an established treatment for secondary mitral regurgitation (MR), while transcatheter mitral valve replacement is a potential and expanding option for managing both secondary and primary MR. However, additional advancements are necessary to enhance the safety and feasibility of this procedure. Transcatheter tricuspid intervention is an emerging option that was conceived after the success of transcatheter procedures in aortic and mitral valves, and it is currently still in the early stages of advancement. This can be attributed, at least in part, to the previously overlooked effect of tricuspid regurgitation on patient outcomes. The development of edge-to-edge repair represents the forefront of innovations in transcatheter procedures. There is a scarcity of data about tricuspid annuloplasty and replacement, and further study is necessary. Transcatheter mitral, tricuspid, and pulmonary procedures show prospects for the future, while their role in clinical practice has not been definitively established.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) is an increasingly used treatment technique for patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Currently, available data from international registries and randomized controlled trials provide outcome data until a maximum follow-up of 2 years after the procedure. This case report presents 4-year follow-up data for an 84-year-old woman who underwent TTVR for torrential TR in 2019. The patient experienced durable TR reduction, symptomatic improvement, right ventricular reverse remodeling, and substantial improvement in liver and kidney function.

Severe tricuspid regurgitation remains largely undertreated given limited treatment options. Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions have emerged as a promising therapy for these patients, and the TRISCEND II pivotal trial is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR). The TRISCEND II pivotal trial studies the transcatheter EVOQUE (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) tricuspid valve replacement system using a United States Food and Drug Administration Breakthrough Device Designation-a program intended to provide timely access to medical devices by speeding up development, assessment, and review. The TRISCEND II trial is a prospective, multicenter trial that randomizes patients with symptomatic severe tricuspid regurgitation to treatment with either TTVR in conjunction with optimal medical therapy or optimal medical therapy alone. The trial\'s novel 2-phase design evaluates 30-day safety and 6-month effectiveness end points for the first 150 patients in the initial phase and a 1-year safety and effectiveness end point for the full cohort of 400 patients in the second phase. The TRISCEND II trial\'s 2-phase trial design provided an opportunity for early review and led to the first commercial approval of a TTVR system. In conclusion, the design of the TRISCEND II trial will likely inform future transcatheter tricuspid device trials.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) are at risk for significant morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) may offer patients less invasive treatment alternatives to surgery. This review evaluates the most common class of device currently used worldwide to treat TR, tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) and orthotopic transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR), both of which are now approved in the USA and Europe.
RESULTS: The first pivotal randomized clinical trial, TRILUMINATE, demonstrated that T-TEER can safely reduce TR and is associated with improved health status outcomes. However, results of this trial have raised questions about whether this device can provide sufficient TR reduction to impact clinical outcomes. Orthotopic TTVR has recently gained attention with initial data suggesting near-complete TR elimination. The current review examines the technical features and anatomic limitations of the most commonly used devices for T-TEER and orthotopic TTVR, discusses the current clinical data for these devices, and offers a theoretical construct for device selection.