transcatheter aortic valve implantation

经导管主动脉瓣植入术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)对外周微循环的影响的数据有限。
    本研究的目的是评估TAVI前后的外周血微血管组织饱和度(StO2)与中枢和外周血流动力学的关系,心脏和肾功能。
    在这项单中心前瞻性研究中,在手术前和手术后5天,对计划进行TAVI或心导管插入术(对照)的重度主动脉瓣狭窄(sAS)患者进行评估.通过超声心动图评估心脏功能,包括心输出量(CO)。肱动脉(bBP)和中枢血压(cBP),踝臂指数(ABI),和动脉僵硬度的参数,包括增加压力(AP)和根据心率调整的增加指数(AIX@HR75),以评估血流动力学变化.使用近红外光谱(NIRS)相机在所有四肢中测量StO2。通过肌酐水平测量肾功能。
    26例患者接受TAVI,11例患者作为对照。心输出量明显增加,而TAVI后血流动力学参数和外周StO2显著下降。在后续行动中,StO2返回基线值。StO2的变化与肌酐水平呈负相关。
    经导管主动脉瓣植入术会导致与肾功能相关的微血管组织饱和度暂时降低。
    UNASSIGNED: Data on the effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) on peripheral microcirculation are limited.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study is to evaluate peripheral microvascular tissue saturation (StO2) before and after TAVI in relation to central and peripheral hemodynamics, cardiac and renal function.
    UNASSIGNED: In this single-center prospective study, patients with severe aortic stenosis (sAS) scheduled for TAVI or cardiac catheterization (control) were assessed before and up to five days after the procedure. Cardiac function including cardiac output (CO) was assessed by echocardiography. Brachial (bBP) and central blood pressure (cBP), ankle brachial index (ABI), and parameters of arterial stiffness, including augmentation pressure (AP) and augmentation index adjusted for heart rate (AIx@HR75) were measured to assess hemodynamic changes. StO2 was measured in all extremities using a near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) camera. Renal function was measured by creatinine levels.
    UNASSIGNED: 26 patients underwent TAVI and 11 patients served as control. Cardiac output was significantly increased, whereas hemodynamic parameters and peripheral StO2 were significantly decreased after TAVI. At follow-up, StO2 returned to baseline values. Changes in StO2 were negatively related to creatinine levels.
    UNASSIGNED: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation causes a temporary decrease in microvascular tissue saturation that is associated with renal function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血液多标记方法可能有助于增强接受TAVI的患者的风险分层。
    本研究的目的是确定多种血液生物标志物在经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)患者中的预后价值。
    在这项前瞻性研究中,心血管功能的几种血液生物标志物,炎症,对362例接受TAVI的患者进行肾功能测定。根据血液生物标志物升高的数量将队列分为3组(即,术前每位患者的≥整个队列的中值)。进行生存分析以评估血液生物标志物与TAVI后不良事件风险之间的关联。
    在2.5(IQR:1.9-3.2)年的中位随访期间,34例(9.4%)患者因心力衰竭再次住院,99例(27%)患者死亡,113例(31.2%)达到全因死亡率或心力衰竭再住院的复合终点.与具有0至3个升高的生物标志物的患者(参考组)相比,那些具有4至7和8至9个升高的生物标志物的患者具有更高的全因死亡率风险(HR:1.54[95%CI:0.84-2.80],P=0.16,HR:2.81[95%CI:1.53-5.15],分别为P<0.001)和复合终点(HR:1.65[95%CI:0.95-2.84],P=0.07,HR:2.67[95%CI:1.52-4.70]P<0.001,分别)。此外,将升高的血液生物标志物的数量添加到临床多变量模型中,对全因死亡率提供了显著的增量预测价值(净重新分类指数=0.71,P<0.001).
    越来越多的血液生物标志物升高与TAVI后不良临床结局的高风险相关。血液多标记方法可能有助于增强TAVI患者的风险分层。
    UNASSIGNED: A blood multimarker approach may be useful to enhance risk stratification in patients undergoing TAVI.
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic value of multiple blood biomarkers in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients.
    UNASSIGNED: In this prospective study, several blood biomarkers of cardiovascular function, inflammation, and renal function were measured in 362 patients who underwent TAVI. The cohort was divided into 3 groups according to the number of elevated blood biomarkers (ie, ≥ median value for the whole cohort) for each patient before the procedure. Survival analyses were conducted to evaluate the association between blood biomarkers and risk of adverse event following TAVI.
    UNASSIGNED: During a median follow-up of 2.5 (IQR: 1.9-3.2) years, 34 (9.4%) patients were rehospitalized for heart failure, 99 (27%) patients died, and 113 (31.2%) met the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or heart failure rehospitalization. Compared to patients with 0 to 3 elevated biomarkers (referent group), those with 4 to 7 and 8 to 9 elevated biomarkers had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.54 [95% CI: 0.84-2.80], P = 0.16, and HR: 2.81 [95% CI: 1.53-5.15], P < 0.001, respectively) and of the composite endpoint (HR: 1.65 [95% CI: 0.95-2.84], P = 0.07, and HR: 2.67 [95% CI: 1.52-4.70] P < 0.001, respectively). Moreover, adding the number of elevated blood biomarkers into the clinical multivariable model provided significant incremental predictive value for all-cause mortality (Net Reclassification Index = 0.71, P < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: An increasing number of elevated blood biomarkers is associated with higher risks of adverse clinical outcomes following TAVI. The blood multimarker approach may be helpful to enhance risk stratification in TAVI patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有严重主动脉瓣狭窄和癌症的患者通常被拒绝手术主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR),因为围手术期死亡的风险过高。
    本研究的目的是确定严重主动脉瓣狭窄和癌症患者经导管主动脉瓣植入(TAVI)的安全性。
    全国住院患者样本数据库(2002-2018)用于研究具有活动性或先前前列腺病史的患者的TAVI与SAVR的结果,肺,结直肠,乳房,和肾癌。倾向评分匹配分析,以计算主要不良心血管事件(MACE)及其组成部分的调整比值比(aOR)。
    共有1,505,995名粗人群和345,413名非癌症患者和33,565名癌症患者进行倾向评分匹配分析。年趋势显示,TAVI的利用率急剧增加。与SAVR相比,TAVI在前列腺癌中住院死亡的风险较低,而其他癌症类型之间没有差异。肺癌(aOR:0.65;95%CI:0.43-0.97)和前列腺癌(aOR:0.79;95%CI:0.66-0.96)而结直肠癌(aOR:1.43;95%CI:1.08-1.90)与TAVI发生MACE的几率更高。TAVI的大出血发生率较低(肺癌除外),而TAVI和SAVR的卒中风险相似(结直肠癌除外).
    前列腺患者的TAVI,乳房,肺,肾癌似乎是SAVR的合理替代方案,死亡率和MACE风险较低或相似.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with severe aortic stenosis and cancer are often denied surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) due to a prohibitive risk of perioperative mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis and cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2002-2018) was used to study the outcomes of TAVI vs SAVR in patients with active or prior history of prostate, lung, colorectal, breast, and renal cancer. A propensity score-matched analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and its components.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 1,505,995 crude population and a subset of 345,413 noncancer and 33,565 cancer patients were selected on propensity score-matched analysis. The yearly trend showed a steep increase in the utilization of TAVI. Compared with SAVR, TAVI had a lower risk of in-hospital mortality in prostate cancer, while there was no difference among other cancer types. Patients with lung (aOR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.43-0.97) and prostate cancer (aOR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.66-0.96) had lower, while colorectal cancer (aOR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.08-1.90) had higher odds of MACE with TAVI. The incidence of major bleeding was lower with TAVI (except for lung cancer), while the risk of stroke was similar (except for colorectal cancer) between TAVI and SAVR.
    UNASSIGNED: TAVI in patients with prostate, breast, lung, and renal cancer appears to be a reasonable alternative to SAVR with lower or similar risks of mortality and MACE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经导管主动脉瓣植入(TAVI)率在黑人中低于白人个体。然而,目前还不清楚种族居住隔离,这在美国仍然很常见,有助于观察到的TAVI率差异。
    这项研究的目的是评估县级种族隔离之间的关联,和主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)诊断,管理,和结果。
    我们确定了黑人和白人医疗保险按服务付费的受益人年龄≥65岁,居住在美国大都市地区(2016-2019年)。使用美国社区调查的黑白住宅隔离指数,衡量地理种族分布,我们确定了每个受益人居住县的隔离。使用分层建模,我们确定了种族隔离与AS诊断率之间的关系,TAVI收据,和30天临床结果(死亡率,重新接纳,stroke).
    有29,264,075名受益人,其中22%的人生活在一个高隔离县。在黑人受益人中,与低隔离县居民相比,高隔离县居民的AS诊断率(OR:0.97;95%CI:0.96-0.98)和TAVI(OR:0.89;95%CI:0.86-0.93)降低.相比之下,在白人受益人中,高隔离县居民与较高的AS诊断率相关(OR:1.02;95%CI:1.02-1.03),TAVI无差异(OR:1.00;95%CI:0.99-1.00).隔离和种族与30天死亡率无关。
    在黑人医疗保险按服务收费的受益人中,生活在高隔离县与AS诊断率和TAVI率下降独立相关,白人受益人中没有看到的协会。居住的种族隔离可能会导致AS护理中的种族差异。
    UNASSIGNED: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) rates are lower among Black compared with White individuals. However, it is unclear whether racial residential segregation, which remains common in the United States, contributes to observed disparities in TAVI rates.
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between county-level racial segregation, and aortic stenosis (AS) diagnosis, management, and outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified Black and White Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries age ≥65 years living in metropolitan areas of the United States (2016-2019). Using the American Community Survey\'s Black-White residential segregation index, a measure of geographic racial distribution, we determined segregation in each beneficiary\'s county of residence. Using hierarchical modeling, we determined the association between racial segregation and rates of AS diagnosis, TAVI receipt, and 30-day clinical outcomes (mortality, readmission, stroke).
    UNASSIGNED: There were 29,264,075 beneficiaries, of whom 22% lived in a high-segregation county. Among Black beneficiaries, high-segregation county residence was associated with decreased rates of AS diagnosis (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96-0.98) and TAVI (OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.86-0.93) compared with low-segregation county residence. In contrast, among White beneficiaries, high-segregation county residence was associated with higher rates of AS diagnosis (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.02-1.03) and no differences in TAVI (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.99-1.00). Segregation and race were not independently associated with 30-day mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: Among Black Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, living in a high-segregation county was independently associated with decreased rates of AS diagnosis and TAVI, an association not seen among White beneficiaries. Residential racial segregation may contribute to racial disparities seen in AS care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    确定经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后再入院的预测因素是一项重要的未满足需求。
    我们试图探索机器学习(ML)在预测TAVI后再入院中的作用。
    我们将2016年至2019年接受TAVI的患者纳入全国再入院数据库。共有917个候选预测因子代表所有国际疾病分类,第十次修订,包括诊断和程序代码。首先,我们使用套索回归来删除非信息变量和排名信息变量。接下来,我们使用无监督ML模型(K-means)来识别数据中的模式/聚类。此外,我们使用了光梯度提升机和Shapley加法扩张来指定单个预测因子的影响。最后,我们建立了一个简约的模型来预测30天的再入院。
    在30天和90天的分析中,共纳入了117,398和93,800指数TAVI住院。分别。Lasso回归为30天和90天的再入院确定了138和199个信息丰富的预测因子,分别。接下来,K-means识别两个不同的集群:低风险和高风险。在30天的队列中,低危组的再入院率为10.1%,高危组的再入院率为23.3%.在90天的队列中,分别为17.4%和35.3%,分别。最重要的预测因素是停留时间,脆弱的分数,总出院诊断,急性肾损伤,和Elixhauser分数。这些预测因子被纳入风险评分(TAVI再入院评分),在外部验证队列中表现良好(曲线下面积0.74[0.7-0.78])。
    ML方法可以利用广泛可用的管理数据库来识别TAVI后有再次入院风险的患者。这可以告知和改善TAVI后的护理。
    UNASSIGNED: Identifying predictors of readmissions after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an important unmet need.
    UNASSIGNED: We sought to explore the role of machine learning (ML) in predicting readmissions after TAVI.
    UNASSIGNED: We included patients who underwent TAVI between 2016 and 2019 in the Nationwide Readmission Database. A total of 917 candidate predictors representing all International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, diagnosis and procedure codes were included. First, we used lasso regression to remove noninformative variables and rank informative ones. Next, we used an unsupervised ML model (K-means) to identify patterns/clusters in the data. Furthermore, we used Light Gradient Boosting Machine and Shapley Additive exPlanations to specify the impact of individual predictors. Finally, we built a parsimonious model to predict 30-day readmission.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 117,398 and 93,800 index TAVI hospitalizations were included in the 30- and 90-day analyses, respectively. Lasso regression identified 138 and 199 informative predictors for the 30- and 90-day readmission, respectively. Next, K-means recognized 2 distinct clusters: low risk and high risk. In the 30-day cohort, the readmission rate was 10.1% in the low risk group and 23.3% in the high risk group. In the 90-day cohort, the rates were 17.4% and 35.3%, respectively. The top predictors were the length of stay, frailty score, total discharge diagnoses, acute kidney injury, and Elixhauser score. These predictors were incorporated into a risk score (TAVI readmission score), which exhibited good performance in an external validation cohort (area under the curve 0.74 [0.7-0.78]).
    UNASSIGNED: ML methods can leverage widely available administrative databases to identify patients at risk for readmission after TAVI, which could inform and improve post-TAVI care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在被排除在临床试验之外的主动脉瓣疾病患者中,经导管主动脉瓣植入(TAVI)的使用有所增加,而没有关于其安全性的大规模数据。
    本研究的目的是评估排除的临床试验(CTE)与包括TAVI(CTI-TAVI)患者的临床试验中TAVI的利用趋势和调整结果。
    我们使用国家再录取数据库(2015-2019年)确定了15种CTE-TAVI条件。倾向评分匹配分析用于计算净不良临床事件的调整比值比(aOR)(复合死亡率,中风,和大出血)在接受CTE-TAVI和CTI-TAVI的患者中。
    在223,238名接受TAVI的患者中,CTE-TAVI用于41,408例患者(18.5%)。CTE-TAVI利用率呈逐年上升趋势(P=0.026)。在索引录取时,净不良临床事件的校正几率(AOR:1.83,95%CI:1.73-1.95)及其组成部分,包括死亡率(AOR:2.94,95%CI:2.66-3.24),中风(AOR:1.20,95%CI:1.07-1.34),与CTI-TAVI相比,CTE-TAVI中的大出血(aOR:1.49,95%CI:1.36-1.63)显着升高。在CTE-TAVI临床试验招募的个人禁忌症中,患有二叶主动脉瓣的患者,白细胞减少症,与CTI-TAVI相比,消化性溃疡似乎有相似的结果,而终末期肾病患者,生物人工主动脉瓣,凝血病在30天和180天的再入院率较高。
    CTE-TAVI利用率在4年的研究期间显著增加。接受CTE-TAVI的患者死亡的可能性更高,中风,和出血比那些接受CTI-TAVI。
    UNASSIGNED: The use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with aortic valve disease excluded from clinical trials has increased with no large-scale data on its safety.
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to assess the trend of utilization and adjusted outcomes of TAVI in clinical trials excluded (CTE) vs clinical trials included TAVI (CTI-TAVI) patients.
    UNASSIGNED: We used the National Readmission Database (2015-2019) to identify 15 CTE-TAVI conditions. A propensity score-matched analysis was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of net adverse clinical events (composite of mortality, stroke, and major bleeding) in patients undergoing CTE-TAVI vs CTI-TAVI.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the 223,238 patients undergoing TAVI, CTE-TAVI was used in 41,408 patients (18.5%). The yearly trend showed a steep increase in CTE-TAVI utilization (P = 0.026). At index admission, the adjusted odds of net adverse clinical events (aOR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.73-1.95) and its components, including mortality (aOR: 2.94, 95% CI: 2.66-3.24), stroke (aOR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07-1.34), and major bleeding (aOR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.36-1.63) were significantly higher in CTE-TAVI compared with CTI-TAVI. Among the individual contraindications to clinical trial enrollment in the CTE-TAVI, patients with bicuspid aortic valve, leukopenia, and peptic ulcer disease appeared to have similar outcomes compared with CTI-TAVI, while patients with end-stage renal disease, bioprosthetic aortic valves, and coagulopathy had a higher readmission rate at 30 and 180 days.
    UNASSIGNED: CTE-TAVI utilization has increased significantly over the 4-year study period. Patients undergoing CTE-TAVI have a higher likelihood of mortality, stroke, and bleeding than those undergoing CTI-TAVI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    结构性心脏病在普通人群中越来越普遍,尤其是年龄增长的患者。经导管结构性心脏介入治疗的最新进展获得了重要的关注,现在被认为是治疗稳定瓣膜疾病的主要选择。然而,经导管介入治疗的概念也在急性环境中进行了一些研究人员的测试,特别是在急性缺血或急性失代偿性心力衰竭导致瓣膜疾病的情况下。经过测试的干预措施包括二尖瓣和主动脉瓣,主要评估二尖瓣经导管边缘到边缘修复和经导管主动脉瓣植入术,分别。这篇综述将集中在紧急情况下急性结构性心脏干预的使用,它将描述可用的数据,并对最佳患者表型和该领域的未来方向进行有意义的讨论。
    Structural heart disease is increasingly prevalent in the general population, especially in patients of increased age. Recent advances in transcatheter structural heart interventions have gained a significant following and are now considered a mainstay option for managing stable valvular disease. However, the concept of transcatheter interventions has also been tested in acute settings by several investigators, especially in cases where valvular disease comes as a result of acute ischemia or in the context of acute decompensated heart failure. Tested interventions include both the mitral and aortic valve, mostly evaluating mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and transcatheter aortic valve implantation, respectively. This review is going to focus on the use of acute structural heart interventions in the emergent setting, and it will delineate the available data and provide a meaningful discussion on the optimal patient phenotype and future directions of the field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的患者中进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的最佳时机尚未确定。在这个荟萃分析中,我们的目的是比较接受PCI术前与TAVR术后患者的结局.方法:进行了全面的文献检索,包括Medline,Embase,和截至2024年4月5日的Cochrane电子数据库,用于比较TAVR报告至少一项临床结果的PCI前后的研究(PROSPEROID:CRD42023470417)。分析的结果是死亡率,中风,随访时心肌梗死(MI)。结果:根据我们的纳入标准,共有3项研究纳入了1531例患者(TAVRPCI前n=1240;TAVRPCI后n=291)。TAVR前PCI组的死亡率更高(OR:2.48;95%CI:1.19-5.20;p=0.02)。TAVR前后PCI的卒中风险(OR:3.58;95%CI:0.70-18.15;p=0.12)和MI(OR:0.66;95%CI:0.30-1.42;p=0.29)无差异。结论:这项荟萃分析显示,在接受TAVR的稳定型CAD患者中,TAVR后PCI与TAVR前PCI相比,死亡率较低。
    Background: The optimal timing to perform percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is not well established. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing PCI before versus after TAVR. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases up to 5 April 2024 for studies that compared PCI before and after TAVR reporting at least one clinical outcome of interest (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023470417). The analyzed outcomes were mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI) at follow-up. Results: A total of 3 studies involving 1531 patients (pre-TAVR PCI n = 1240; post-TAVR PCI n = 291) were included in this meta-analysis following our inclusion criteria. Mortality was higher in the pre-TAVR PCI group (OR: 2.48; 95% CI: 1.19-5.20; p = 0.02). No differences were found between PCI before and after TAVR for the risk of stroke (OR: 3.58; 95% CI: 0.70-18.15; p = 0.12) and MI (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.30-1.42; p = 0.29). Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed in patients with stable CAD undergoing TAVR that PCI after TAVR is associated with lower mortality compared with PCI before TAVR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号