transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA)

经支气管针吸活检术 (TBNA)
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在肺癌中,需要分子检测和下一代测序(NGS)来确定治疗靶标,并且越来越多地用于疾病的早期阶段.尽管它长期使用,目前尚不清楚经支气管针吸活检术(TBNA)对周围型肺病变是否像经支气管钳活检术(TBFBs)一样为基因检测提供了足够的材料.在这项研究中,我们的目标是使用中位活细胞面积(MVCA)作为分析样品质量的替代参数来分析TBNA.
    这项前瞻性单中心研究分析了接受支气管镜和经支气管活检的患者的活检标本或抽吸物。患者在周围性肺病变中接受了TBFB和TBNA的支气管镜检查,以怀疑肺癌。患者以1:1的比例随机接受TBFB或TBNA作为第一种活检技术,然后切换到另一种活检技术。例行检查后,样品载玻片进行了数字扫描,和MVCA由对所用活检技术不知情的病理学家计算。主要终点是TBNA与TBFB的MVCA。次要终点是并发症分类为出血,气胸,和其他。
    在2021年8月至2022年4月之间,15名患者被纳入符合方案分析。队列1中包括6名患者,队列2中包括9名患者。11/15(73.3%)例确诊为恶性诊断,其中9例是原发性肺部恶性肿瘤。总的来说,通过TBFB获得的样品中的MVCA明显大于TBNA样品{TBFB-MVCA9.80mm2[四分位间距(IQR),2.70-10.39mm2]vs.TBNA-MVCA2.70mm2(IQR,0.14-8.21mm2),P=0.008}。尽管有这种差异,分子测试在TBNA和TBFB样品中都是可行的。未观察到重大并发症。
    尽管TBNA提供了明显较小的MVCA,样品仍然被认为对NGS是可行的,这表明TBNA是在周围结节中获得足够肿瘤组织的替代方法,作为疑似肺癌诊断的一部分。
    UNASSIGNED: In lung cancer, molecular testing and next-generation sequencing (NGS) are needed to identify therapeutic targets and are increasingly being used in earlier stages of the disease. Despite its longstanding use, it remains unclear whether transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) of peripheral lung lesions provides as adequate material for genetic testing as transbronchial forceps biopsies (TBFBs). In this study, we aim to analyze the use of TBNA using median viable cell area (MVCA) as a surrogate parameter to analyze sample quality.
    UNASSIGNED: This prospective single-center study analyzed biopsy specimens or aspirates of patients who underwent bronchoscopy with transbronchial biopsy. Patients underwent bronchoscopy with TBFB and TBNA for suspected lung cancer in peripheral lung lesions. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either TBFB or TBNA as the first biopsy technique and then switched to the other. After routine workup, sample slides were digitally scanned, and MVCA was calculated by a pathologist blinded to the biopsy technique used. The primary endpoint was MVCA of TBNA versus TBFB. Secondary endpoints were complications categorized as bleeding, pneumothorax, and other.
    UNASSIGNED: Between August 2021 and April 2022, 15 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis. Six patients were included in cohort 1 and nine patients in cohort 2. A malignant diagnosis was confirmed in 11/15 (73.3%) cases, of which nine were primary lung malignancies. Overall, MVCA in samples obtained by TBFB was significantly larger than TBNA samples {TBFB-MVCA 9.80 mm2 [interquartile range (IQR), 2.70-10.39 mm2] vs. TBNA-MVCA 2.70 mm2 (IQR, 0.14-8.21 mm2), P=0.008}. Despite this difference, molecular testing was feasible in both TBNA and TBFB samples. No major complications were observed.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite a significantly smaller MVCA provided by TBNA, samples were still considered feasible for NGS, indicating that TBNA represents an alternative method to obtain sufficient tumor tissue in peripheral nodules as part of the diagnosis of suspected lung cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)已用于肺癌的诊断和分期。Acquire™肺部和Expect™肺部专用EBUS-TBNA针头作为Franseen和Lancet针头引入,分别。尚不清楚Franseen或Lancet针头是否能产生更高质量的样本,尤其是专注于基于下一代测序的分子测试。
    方法:单中心,在千叶大学医院进行的前瞻性研究将患者随机分为两组:A组,其中第一和第二EBUS-TBNA使用柳叶刀和弗兰塞针进行,分别,B组,其中第一和第二EBUS-TBNA使用Franseen和Lancet针进行,分别。对各标本进行病理对比分析。主要结果是除了血凝块和每个样品的细胞数量之外的组织学组织面积。我们还检查了分子测试的成功率。
    结果:本研究纳入了2022年11月至2023年2月期间接受EBUS-TBNA的12例患者。通过Franseen和Lancet针获得的标本的组织面积分别为13.3±6.4mm2和10.6±6.3mm2(P=.355)。使用Franseen和Lancet针获得的标本中的肿瘤细胞率为54.0±30.3和46.2±36.3%,分别(P=.608)。使用Franseen针的单次通过样品进行分子检测的成功率分别为85.7%和Lancet针的57.1%。无严重并发症报告。
    结论:与柳叶刀针相比,Franseen针倾向于显示更大量的肿瘤细胞性标本,这可能有助于更高的分子检测成功率。必须进行进一步的研究以验证本研究的结果。
    结果:什么是已知的,什么是新的?含义是什么,现在应该改变什么?
    BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been used to diagnose and stage lung cancer. Acquire™ Pulmonary and Expect™ Pulmonary dedicated EBUS-TBNA needles were introduced as the Franseen and Lancet needles, respectively. It is still unclear whether the Franseen or Lancet needles yield a higher quality specimen especially focusing on next-generation sequencing-based molecular testing.
    METHODS: A single-center, prospective study performed at the Chiba University Hospital randomly assigned patients to two groups: Group A, wherein the first and second EBUS-TBNA were performed using Lancet and Franseen needles, respectively, and Group B, wherein the first and second EBUS-TBNA were performed using Franseen and Lancet needles, respectively. Each specimen was compared and analyzed pathologically. The primary outcome was the histological tissue area except blood clot and the cellularity of each sample. We also examined the success rate of molecular testing.
    RESULTS: Twelve patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA between November 2022 and February 2023 were enrolled in this study. The tissue area of the specimens obtained by the Franseen and Lancet needles was 13.3 ± 6.4 mm2 and 10.6 ± 6.3 mm2, respectively (P = .355). The tumor cellularity in the specimens obtained using the Franseen and Lancet needles was 54.0 ± 30.3 and 46.2 ± 36.3%, respectively (P = .608). The success rate of molecular testing using the single-pass sample by Franseen needle was 85.7 and 57.1% by Lancet needle. No serious complications were reported.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Franseen needle tended to show a greater amount of specimen with higher tumor cellularity than the Lancet needle which may contribute higher success rate of molecular testing. Further studies must be conducted to validate the results of this study.
    RESULTS: What is known and what is new?  What is the implication, and what should change now?
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)纵隔和肺门淋巴结分期中的作用已得到证实。然而,其在其他病理如淋巴瘤中的诊断效用的证据仍然不足.这项回顾性观察性研究旨在确定与EBUS-TBNA相比,EBUS引导的微型镊子活检(EBUS-MFB)在恶性和非恶性疾病中的诊断率。
    我们在2019年1月至2022年12月期间,对我们机构转诊为EBUS的所有成年患者进行了回顾性横断面图审查。纳入所有同时接受EBUS-TBNA和EBUS-MFB的患者,一些患者也接受了经支气管冷冻活检。排除无病理报告的患者。
    EBUS-MFB和EBUS-TBNA的组合在整个队列(34.4%)和未接受经支气管冷冻活检的患者(46.2%)中的诊断结果百分比最高。与EBUS-TBNA相比,单独的EBUS-MFB产生更多的诊断结果。经支气管冷冻活检是冷冻活检组中诊断结果百分比最高的采样方法(64.5%)。统计学分析显示,EBUS-MFB和EBUS-TBNA的诊断率存在显著差异(P<0.001)。EBUS-MFB总体诊断结果较高。在良性病例中,EBUS-MFB的诊断率明显高于EBUS-TBNA,在诊断为结节病的患者中,但不是恶性疾病。
    我们的研究表明,结合EBUS-MFB和EBUS-TBNA可以提高诊断率,特别是在良性病例和结节病中。这些发现支持添加EBUS-MFB比单独添加EBUS-TBNA的潜在优势,并强调需要进一步的随机对照试验来验证这些结果。本研究的回顾性性质和某些局限性,例如缺乏足够的长期随访,选择和运营商偏见,在某些情况下,缺乏快速的现场评估(ROSE),在解释结果时应该考虑。尽管如此,本研究为越来越多的证据表明,EBUS-MFB在提高特定临床情景下EBUS诊断效率方面的效用做出了贡献.
    UNASSIGNED: The role of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in staging mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is well established. However, evidence of its diagnostic utility in other pathologies-such as lymphoma-remains inadequate. This retrospective observational study aims to determine the diagnostic yield of EBUS-guided miniforceps biopsy (EBUS-MFB) compared to EBUS-TBNA in both malignant and nonmalignant conditions.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional chart review of all adult patients referred for EBUS at our institution between January 2019 and December 2022. All patients who underwent both EBUS-TBNA and EBUS-MFB were included, with some patients also undergoing transbronchial cryobiopsy. Patients without pathology reports available were excluded.
    UNASSIGNED: The combination of EBUS-MFB and EBUS-TBNA had the highest percentage of diagnostic results both in the overall cohort (34.4%) and in patients who did not undergo transbronchial cryobiopsy (46.2%). EBUS-MFB alone yielded more diagnostic results compared to EBUS-TBNA. Transbronchial cryobiopsy was the sampling method with the highest percentage of diagnostic results in the cryobiopsy group (64.5%). Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in diagnostic yield between EBUS-MFB and EBUS-TBNA (P<0.001), with EBUS-MFB showing a higher diagnostic yield overall. EBUS-MFB had a significantly higher diagnostic yield than EBUS-TBNA in benign cases, in patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis, but not in malignant disease.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study suggests that combining EBUS-MFB with EBUS-TBNA can improve the diagnostic yield, particularly in benign cases and sarcoidosis. These findings support the potential superiority of adding EBUS-MFB over EBUS-TBNA alone and highlight the need for further randomized control trials to validate these results. The retrospective nature of this study and certain limitations, such as the lack of adequate longer-term follow-up, selection and operator biases, and the absence of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) in some cases, should be considered when interpreting the results. Nonetheless, this study contributes to the growing evidence for the utility of EBUS-MFB in improving the diagnostic yield of EBUS procedures in specific clinical scenarios.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:可以使用各种技术对周围型肺部病变进行采样,包括计算机断层扫描引导的经胸穿刺,电磁导航支气管镜,虚拟导航支气管镜,经支气管镜经径向探头支气管内超声肺活检。可以使用凸形探头支气管内超声引导的经支气管针吸活检(CEBUS-TBNA)和内窥镜超声细针吸活检等技术对纵隔病变进行采样。然而,有效,缺乏针对邻近节段或节段下支气管的病变的安全技术。在这里,我们回顾性评估了径向探头支气管内超声辅助经支气管针吸活检术(REBUS-TBNA)对节段支气管附近病变的诊断率和安全性,并探讨了与诊断产量相关的因素。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了2019年1月至2022年12月在我科进行的REBUS-TBNA病例的诊断率和安全性。观察组患者对邻近节段支气管的病变行REBUS-TBNA治疗;对照组患者对纵隔或肺门病变行CEBUS-TBNA治疗。患者特征和病变大小,诊断产量,不良事件,并分析诊断率与临床特征的关系。
    结果:组间性别差异无统计学意义,年龄,诊断产量,或不良事件的发生率。观察组(n=25;男性17,8名女性)的平均年龄为64.76±10.75岁。平均病灶大小为4.66±1.07cm,病变主要在上叶(80%)。REBUS-TBNA诊断率为84%,没有不良事件的报告。诊断结果与病变大小或支气管狭窄程度无关;然而,与穿刺次数呈正相关。>3次穿刺的患者的诊断率明显高于≤3次穿刺的患者。
    结论:REBUS-TBNA是一种安全的,有效的诊断技术,特别是上叶节段或下段支气管附近的病变。在手术过程中执行三次以上的穿刺提高了诊断产量。有必要进行大规模的研究来证实这些结果,并进一步探讨REBUS-TBNA的临床应用价值。
    BACKGROUND: Peripheral lung lesions can be sampled using various techniques, including computer tomography-guided transthoracic needle aspiration, electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy, virtual navigation bronchoscopy, and radial probe endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial lung biopsy. Mediastinal lesions can be sampled using techniques like convex probe endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (CEBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration. However, effective, safe techniques for lesions adjacent to the segmental or subsegmental bronchi are lacking. Herein, we retrospectively evaluated the diagnostic yield and safety of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound-assisted transbronchial needle aspiration (REBUS-TBNA) for lesions adjacent to the segmental bronchi, and explored the factors related to diagnostic yield.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the diagnostic yield and safety of REBUS-TBNA cases performed in our department from January 2019 to December 2022. Observation group patients had undergone REBUS-TBNA for lesions adjacent to the segmental bronchi; control group patients had undergone CEBUS-TBNA for mediastinal or hilar lesions. Patient characteristics and lesion sizes, diagnostic yield, adverse events, and relations between diagnostic yield and clinical characteristics were analyzed.
    RESULTS: There were not statistically significant between-group differences in sex, age, diagnostic yield, or rate of adverse events. The observation group (n = 25; 17 male, 8 female) had a mean age of 64.76 ± 10.75 years. The average lesion size was 4.66 ± 1.07 cm, and lesions were predominantly in the upper lobes (80%). REBUS-TBNA diagnostic yield was 84%, with no adverse events reported. Diagnostic yield was not associated with lesion size or extent of bronchial stenosis; however, it was positively correlated with number of punctures. Patients with > 3 punctures had a significantly higher diagnostic yield than those with ≤ 3 punctures.
    CONCLUSIONS: REBUS-TBNA is a safe, effective diagnostic technique, particularly for lesions adjacent to the segmental or subsegmental bronchi of the upper lobe. Performing more than three punctures during the procedure improves the diagnostic yield. Larger-scale studies are warranted to confirm these results, and to further explore the clinical value of REBUS-TBNA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)是评估纵隔和肺门病变的标准。EBUS-TBNA受到用于免疫组织化学(IHC)和对肿瘤治疗重要的辅助研究的少量材料的限制。FranseeAcquireTM针头设计用于EBUS经支气管针芯活检(TBNB),允许更大的核心尺寸,在胃肠病学文献中有证据,但在肺科很少。本研究报告了EBUS-TBNB在亚太地区的首次经验,以及用于诊断和辅助研究的样本是否足够。
    于2019年12月至2021年5月在皇家阿德莱德医院进行了EBUS-TBNB的回顾性队列研究。诊断率,对辅助研究的充分性和并发症进行了评估.将样品冲入福尔马林中进行组织学处理,没有快速的现场细胞学评估(ROSE)。对于疑似淋巴瘤,将样品冲入HANKS进行流式细胞术。对同一18个月期间使用OlympusVizishotTM进行的病例进行了类似分析。
    用AcquireTM针对一百八十九名患者进行采样。确诊率为174/189(92.1%)。其中报告[146/189(77.2%)],平均芯材骨料粒径为13.4mm×10.7mm×1.7mm。对于非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)病例,45/49(91.8%)有足够的组织用于程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)。32/35(91.4%)腺癌病例有足够的组织进行辅助研究。在第一次AcquireTM手术中有一个假阴性恶性淋巴结。无重大并发症。用VizishotTM针头对101名患者进行了采样。诊断率为86/101(85.1%),仅25/101(24.8%)具有报告的组织核心(VizishotTM的P<0.0001),其余样品通过细胞块处理。
    AcquireTMEBUS-TBNB诊断率与历史数据相当,超过90%的病例具有足够的核心材料用于辅助研究。AcquireTM似乎与淋巴结病,特别是肺癌的护理标准一起发挥作用。
    UNASSIGNED: Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is the standard for evaluating mediastinal and hilar lesions. EBUS-TBNA is limited by small volume of material obtained for immunohistochemistry (IHC) and ancillary studies important for oncological therapies. The Franseen AcquireTM needle is designed for EBUS-transbronchial needle core biopsy (TBNB) allowing larger core sizes with evidence in gastroenterology literature but little in pulmonology. This study reports the first Asia-Pacific experience of EBUS-TBNB and adequacy of samples for diagnosis and ancillary studies.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective cohort study of EBUS-TBNB at the Royal Adelaide Hospital was conducted between December 2019 and May 2021. Diagnostic rate, adequacy for ancillary studies and complications were evaluated. Samples were flushed into formalin for histological processing with no rapid on-site cytological evaluation (ROSE). For suspected lymphoma, samples were flushed into HANKS for flow cytometry. Cases performed with the Olympus VizishotTM during the same 18-month were similarly analysed.
    UNASSIGNED: One hundred and eighty-nine patients were sampled with the AcquireTM needle. Diagnostic rate was 174/189 (92.1%). Where reported [146/189 (77.2%)], average core aggregate sample size was 13.4 mm × 10.7 mm × 1.7 mm. For non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases, 45/49 (91.8%) had adequate tissue for programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). 32/35 (91.4%) adenocarcinoma cases had sufficient tissue for ancillary studies. There was one false negative malignant lymph node at the first AcquireTM procedure. There were no major complications. One hundred and one patients were sampled with the VizishotTM needle. Diagnostic rate was 86/101 (85.1%) with only 25/101 (24.8%) having reported tissue cores (P<0.0001 of VizishotTM) with the remaining samples processed via cell block.
    UNASSIGNED: AcquireTM EBUS-TBNB diagnostic rate is comparable to historical data with >90% of cases having sufficient core material for ancillary studies. There appears to be a role for the AcquireTM alongside the standard of care for the work up of lymphadenopathy and particularly for lung cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    支气管内超声(EBUS)引导的经支气管针吸活检(TBNA)彻底改变了肺癌的诊断和分期。多项研究支持EBUS作为一种安全,成本效益高,和准确的肺癌诊断方法。即使在晚期非小细胞肺癌的免疫治疗和靶向治疗的突破性发展,EBUS-TBNA仍然是获得用于分子测试的组织的最佳方法。自从EBUS问世以来,已经开发了许多针和活检工具,每个都有自己独特的功能,可能使它适合各种临床情况。针头尺寸从19号到25号不等,抽吸和活检针,以及可用的迷你镊子,现在有许多工具可供选择。在过去的几年里,EBUS在肺部恶性肿瘤领域之外也获得了新的作用。EBUS现在在诊断其他胸部病理中起着重要作用,如结节病和淋巴瘤,以及促进良性和恶性疾病的治疗。随着EBUS的使用越来越广泛,新的工具已经出现,以允许EBUS继续扩大其适用性。这篇综述研究了EBUS引导活检中使用的当前设备和新颖工具的证据。
    Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) has revolutionized the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Multiple studies support EBUS as a safe, cost-effective, and accurate method of diagnosing lung cancer. Even with the groundbreaking developments of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer, EBUS-TBNA remains the optimal method for obtaining tissue for molecular testing. Since the advent of EBUS, there have been a multitude of needles and biopsy tools that have been developed, each with its own unique features that may make it suitable for various clinical situations. With needle sizes ranging from 19 gauge to 25 gauge, and both aspiration and biopsy needles, as well as mini-forceps available, there are now numerous tools to choose from. Over the past several years, EBUS has also gained new roles outside the realm of lung malignancy. EBUS now plays an important role in diagnosing other thoracic pathology, such as sarcoidosis and lymphoma, as well as facilitating treatment of both benign and malignant disease. As the use of EBUS has become more widespread, new tools have emerged to allow for EBUS to continue expanding its applicability. This review examines the evidence for the current equipment and novel tools that are being used in EBUS-guided biopsy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    支气管内导航以多种方式进行,这些都没有满足所有临床医生的需求,以达到每个患者的诊断成功。我们试图使用基于锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的增强荧光透视(AF)图像引导来表征支气管内靶向肺活检中的可弯曲和可操纵的引导鞘(GS)。
    四个预固化GS(EdgeTM45、90、180、180EW,美敦力公司)和两个可操纵GS[6.5FDestinoTwist(DT),Oscor;6FMorph,在三个实验阶段中单独评估了BioCardia],并与电磁跟踪(EM)导向器和活检针结合进行了评估:(I)台架模型以评估GS偏转并进行活检模拟;(II)离体猪肺比较2个可操纵和2个可操纵的GS;(III)体内雄性猪肺,以使用2个可操纵的GS递送针头(n=2)或递送猪基准标记(n=2)。使用商业或原型AF图像引导软件(Philips)基于先前的CT或程序CBCT进行离体和体内图像引导。主要结果是台式评估中的GS递送角(θGS)和针递送角(θN)以及离体和体内研究的针递送误差(mm)(平均值±se)。
    在台式模型中,使用21G或19G活检针时,可操纵DT的GS输送角度范围最大(θN:0-114°)。离体猪肺,针头输送误差为8.7±0.9mm(预弯曲边缘90),5.4±1.9mm(预弯曲边缘180),4.7±1.2mm(可操纵DT),和5.6±2.4mm(可操纵变形)。在体内,可操纵GS的针头输送误差为6.0±1.0mm(DT)和15±7.0mm(Morph).对于可操纵的DT和变形GS,体内标记线圈的递送都是成功的。一例病例报告显示,使用可操纵的DT进行了成功的穿刺活检。
    在没有支气管镜的情况下,采用AF引导的支气管内针输送是可行的,与可操纵的GS相比,可提供可比或改进的准确性。
    BACKGROUND: Endobronchial navigation is performed in a variety of ways, none of which are meeting all the clinicians\' needs required to reach diagnostic success in every patient. We sought to characterize precurved and steerable guiding sheaths (GS) in endobronchial targeting for lung biopsy using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) based augmented fluoroscopy (AF) image guidance.
    METHODS: Four precurved GS (EdgeTM 45, 90, 180, 180EW, Medtronic) and two steerable GS [6.5 F Destino Twist (DT), Oscor; 6 F Morph, BioCardia] were evaluated alone and in combination with an electromagnetic tracking (EM) guide and biopsy needles in three experimental phases: (I) bench model to assess GS deflection and perform biopsy simulations; (II) ex vivo swine lung comparing 2 steerable and 2 precurved GS; and (III) in vivo male swine lung to deliver a needle (n=2 swine) or to deliver a fiducial marker (n=2 swine) using 2 steerable GS. Ex vivo and in vivo image guidance was performed with either commercial or prototype AF image guidance software (Philips) based on either prior CT or procedural CBCT. Primary outcomes were GS delivery angle (θGS) and needle delivery angle (θN) in bench evaluation and needle delivery error (mm) (mean ± se) for ex vivo and in vivo studies.
    RESULTS: The steerable DT had the largest range of GS delivery angles (θN: 0-114°) with either the 21 G or 19 G biopsy needle in the bench model. In ex vivo swine lung, needle delivery errors were 8.7±0.9 mm (precurved Edge 90), 5.4±1.9 mm (precurved Edge 180), 4.7±1.2 mm (steerable DT), and 5.6±2.4 mm (steerable Morph). In vivo, the needle delivery errors for the steerable GS were 6.0±1.0 mm (DT) and 15±7.0 mm (Morph). In vivo marker coil delivery was successful for both the steerable DT and morph GS. A case report demonstrated successful needle biopsy with the steerable DT.
    CONCLUSIONS: Endobronchial needle delivery with AF guidance is feasible without a bronchoscope with steerable GS providing comparable or improved accuracy compared to precurved GS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    来自位于第3至第5段支气管的病变的组织样本很难获得。在这项回顾性研究中,我们旨在评估位于第3至第5段支气管的肺部周围病变的诊断率,在计算机断层扫描(CT)图像上的肺内场附近和支气管外部,使用径向支气管超声(REBUS),然后经支气管针吸活检(TBNA)。
    这项回顾性研究招募了术前CT检查显示病变位于节段支气管(第3至第5位)的患者,但在CT图像上与肺内视野相邻。使用REBUS和TBNA从这些病变获取组织样品。使用支气管镜到达病变周围的支气管,超声探头用于确定病变的位置。然后,超声波探头被撤回,并在超声确定的位置进行穿刺。对获得的组织标本进行病理检查。
    本研究纳入了19例患者,其中男性15例,女性4例,平均年龄55岁。在登记者中,通过TBNA获得的样本成功诊断了8例患者(42.1%),包括6例肺癌,1例非特异性炎症,1例隐球菌感染。诊断率为42.1%。在患者中未观察到术后并发症。具有诊断样本的患者与TBNA未能提供诊断的患者之间的结节直径没有显着差异(2.99±0.96vs.2.26±1.27cm,P=0.20)。
    在REBUS的协助下,TBNA可以获得足够的样本,从而对CT图像上位于肺内视野附近的实质性肺部病变具有合理的诊断率,而没有支气管内侵袭。
    UNASSIGNED: Tissue samples from lesions located in the 3rd to 5th segmental bronchi are challenging to obtain. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic rate of pulmonary peripheral lesions located in the 3rd to 5th segmental bronchi, near the inner field of lung on the computed tomography (CT) image and outside the bronchus, using radial endobronchial ultrasound (REBUS) followed by transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA).
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study enrolled patients whose preoperative CT examinations showed a lesion located in the segmental bronchi (3rd to 5th), yet adjacent to the inner field of lung on the CT image. REBUS followed by TBNA was used to acquire tissue samples from these lesions. A bronchoscope was used to reach the bronchi surrounding the lesion, and an ultrasound probe was used to determine the lesion\'s location. Then, the ultrasound probe was withdrawn, and puncture was performed at the location that was determined by ultrasound. The tissue specimens obtained were subjected to pathological examination.
    UNASSIGNED: Nineteen patients were enrolled in this study including 15 males and 4 females with an average age of 55 years old. Of the enrollees, 8 patients (42.1%) were successfully diagnosed with samples obtained through TBNA, including 6 cases of lung cancer, 1 case of non-specific inflammation, and 1 case of cryptococcal infection. The diagnostic rate was 42.1%. No post-procedural complications were observed among the patients. There was no significant difference in nodule diameter between patients with a diagnostic sample and those in whom TBNA failed to provide a diagnosis (2.99±0.96 vs. 2.26±1.27 cm, P=0.20).
    UNASSIGNED: With the assistance of REBUS, TBNA can acquire sufficient samples to achieve a reasonably diagnostic rate for parenchymal lung lesions located near the inner field of lung on the CT image without intrabronchial invasion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS) has been widely used in the lymph node staging and restaging of lung tumors and the diagnosis of mediastinal diseases. Recent years have seen continuous progress in this technology. For diagnosis, elastography technology can preliminarily distinguish between benign and malignant lesions, so that reduce the number of punctures. CP-EBUS can also be used as an endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) to guide needle aspirations of liver lesions, retroperitoneal lymph nodes and left adrenal gland (LAG) lesions sometimes. Some advances help diagnosing more accurately and effectively, such as the intranodal forceps biopsy (IFB), the new type of 22G needle, the rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) and the cancer gene methylation, etc. In addition, special advances are being made in diagnosis using artificial intelligence (AI). For treatment, CP-EBUS has yielded novel research results when applied to transbronchial needle injection (TBNI) and radioactive seed implantation in clinical cases, and blocking of the cardiac plexus in animal studies. The next-generation CP-EBUS is also ready for use in the clinic and the technology will be improving continuously. Through this review, we hope to educate clinicians on the latest uses of CP-EBUS and open up further research ideas for readers interested in this technology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号