transanal irrigation

经肛门灌洗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性便秘,这很常见,通常很难治疗,有许多起源,包括神经和其他疾病,和药物不良反应,尤其是阿片类药物。慢性功能性便秘缺乏明确的根本原因。越来越多的证据表明,经肛门冲洗(TAI)有助于排泄物,并且在许多对一线治疗没有充分反应的肠功能障碍患者中耐受性良好。最近的论文提供了帮助护士和其他医疗保健专业人员在社区实施最佳实践的见解,包括在开始TAI之前讨论任何援助需求,与患者商定最合适的设备并优化灌溉方案。培训,仔细的跟进和持续的监督提高了依从性和成功率。需要进一步的研究,然而,对TAI反应不充分或无法耐受的患者应转诊至专科服务.
    Chronic constipation, which is common and often difficult to treat, has numerous origins, including neurological and other conditions, and adverse reactions to drugs, especially opioids. Chronic functional constipation lacks a clear underlying cause. Increasing evidence suggests that transanal irrigation (TAI) aids faecal evacuation and is well tolerated in many people with bowel dysfunction who do not adequately respond to first-line treatments. Recent papers offer insights that help nurses and other healthcare professionals implement best practice in the community, including discussing any need for assistance before starting TAI, agreeing the most appropriate device with patients and optimising the irrigation protocol. Training, careful follow-up and ongoing supervision improve adherence and success. Further studies are needed, however, and patients who do not respond adequately or are unable to tolerate TAI should be referred to a specialist service.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    接受直肠切除术的患者中有多达50%患有各种和部分严重的功能问题,尽管保存了肛门括约肌.这些主诉被定义为低位前切除综合征(LARS)。到目前为止,目前尚无关于LARS最有效治疗的随机临床试验.我们的目的是评估与最佳支持治疗相比,经肛门冲洗是否可以改善低位前切除术后患者的肠功能和生活质量。
    接受过低位前切除术的患者将进行这项研究。在病人的访问,有关排便以及其整体生活质量恶化的投诉将使用问卷进行评估,例如低前切除综合征评分,Wexner得分,欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量(QOL)CR-29和测量自己的医疗结果配置文件工具。很少还会提出其他目标问题,如“你会向任何人推荐治疗吗?你是否期望治疗后有所改善;等等。“问卷和量表将每3个月填写一次随访,为期1年。
    这个多中心,随机对照试验将使人们更好地理解LARS治疗.此外,这将是一项产生假设的研究,并将为需要未来前瞻性研究的领域提供信息。
    ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符(NCT05920681)。
    UNASSIGNED: Up to 50% of patients who undergo rectal resection suffer from various and partly severe functional problems, despite the preservation of the anal sphincter. These complaints are defined as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). So far, there are no randomized clinical trials regarding the most effective treatment for LARS. Our aim is to evaluate whether transanal irrigation improves bowel function and quality of life in patients following low anterior resection compared to best supportive care.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients who have undergone low anterior resection will be approached for this study. On patient\'s visit, complaints regarding the defecation as well as any deterioration in their overall quality of life will be assessed using questionnaires such as the Low Anterior Resection Syndromes score, Wexner score, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life (QOL) CR-29, and Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile tool. Few additional target questions will be also asked, such as \"Would you recommend the treatment to anybody; did you expect the improvement following the treatment; etc.\" Questionnaires and scales will be filled on follow-up visits every 3 months for 1 year.
    UNASSIGNED: This multicenter, randomized controlled trial will lead to a better understanding of LARS treatment. Moreover, it will be a hypothesis-generating study and will inform areas needing future prospective studies.
    UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT05920681).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)背景:肠道管理有助于整个Hirschsprung患儿的护理途径。术前肠道管理为儿童和家庭进行牵拉手术做好准备。围手术期肠道管理支持早期恢复,随访中量身定制的肠道管理支持社会节制的实现。(2)方法:我们对我们的机构肠道管理计划进行了横断面评估,以说明前,围手术期及术后肠道管理策略。(3)结果:共有31名儿童接受了初级拉拔,23个没有造口,8个有造口,平均年龄为9个月。所有没有造口的儿童都通过直肠冲洗准备手术。有造口的儿童准备进行手术,并转移造口流出物。经肛门灌溉支持早期恢复。(4)结论:肠道管理是先天性巨结肠患儿管理的重要支柱。将肠道管理纳入护理途径可促进初级牵拉并支持围手术期恢复。
    (1) Background: Bowel management contributes throughout the pathway of care for children with Hirschsprung. Preoperative bowel management prepares the child and family for the pull-through surgery. Perioperative bowel management supports early recovery and tailored bowel management in the follow-up supports the achievement of social continence. (2) Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional assessment of our institutional bowel management program to illustrate the pre-, peri- and postoperative bowel management strategies. (3) Results: A total of 31 children underwent primary pull-through, 23 without a stoma and 8 with a stoma, at a median age of 9 months. All children without a stoma were prepared for surgery by using rectal irrigations. Children with a stoma were prepared for surgery with a transfer of stoma effluent. Transanal irrigation supported early recovery. (4) Conclusions: Bowel management is a key pillar of the management of children with Hirschsprung disease. Incorporating bowel management in the pathway of care facilitates primary pull-through and supports perioperative recovery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    康纳·汉密尔顿检查了医疗从业者在使用经肛门冲洗时应考虑的关键组成部分。
    Conor Hamilton examines the key components healthcare practitioners should consider when using transanal irrigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    神经源性肠功能障碍(NBD)患者的排便功能受到负面影响,需要有效的肠道护理来排便。NBD包括大便失禁和/或便秘,这会降低生活质量和尊严。一些临床指南建议经肛门冲洗(TAI)作为保守治疗后和手术选择前的二线治疗。作为二线治疗中唯一具有既定安全性和有效性的类别,通过带有球囊的直肠导管给药时,尚未完全阐明TAI的作用机制。这篇综述探讨了目前对TAI作用机制的理解,重点研究神经源性肠和不规则排便的病理生理学。通过了解TAI的功能含义,临床医生可能能够更好地将这种模式整合到肠道护理计划中,特别是对于NBD患者,由于结肠运动延迟和大便排空障碍而导致明显便秘,并失去对排便的自愿控制,那些对保守治疗没有反应的人,包括灌肠剂.
    Defecation function is negatively impacted in patients with neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD), who require effective bowel care for stool evacuation. NBD comprises fecal incontinence and/or constipation, which can reduce the quality of life and dignity. Transanal irrigation (TAI) is recommended by several clinical guidelines as the second-line treatment after conservative treatment and before surgical options are considered. As the only class in the second-line treatment with an established safety and efficacy profile, the mechanism of action of TAI has not fully been elucidated when administered through a rectal catheter with a balloon. This review examines the current understanding regarding the mechanism of action of TAI, with a focus on the pathophysiology of neurogenic bowel and irregular defecation. By understanding the functional implications of TAI, clinicians may be better able to integrate this modality into bowel care programs, especially for patients with NBD who have significant constipation due to delayed colonic motility and impaired stool emptying with loss of voluntary control of defecation, and those who are unresponsive to conservative treatment, including enemas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于器质性原因引起的连续性问题,包括以前的结直肠手术或神经系统问题,可能会受益于经肛门冲洗(TAI),该冲洗被证明是非常有效的,但存在许多局限性,包括相对较高的停药率。我们的研究旨在评估针对每位患者量身定制的高级方案的有效性,以防止患者退出并提高满意度。独立性,和生活质量。
    方法:这是一个前瞻性的,介入,多中心,非随机研究纳入4-18岁肠功能障碍儿童,对需要TAI的常规治疗无反应。TAI是根据最佳护理标准进行的,总冲洗量是根据研究开始时进行的低发射X射线钡灌肠确定的。所有患者都接受了节制训练和评估,我们在纳入研究后的不同时间点(T0)对患者的观点和生活质量进行了评估,直至TAI引入后6个月(T3).
    结果:共纳入78例患者。男女比例为1.4:1。入组时的平均年龄为106.1±42.8个月。3例患者报告停药(3.8%)。继续,满意度和其他一些结局指标从基线(T0)到最后一次访视(T3)增加.特别是,在研究期间(T0至T3时间点),平均Rintala总分从7.8线性增加至14.8.在多变量分析中,唯一被证明与尿失禁以及其他结局指标呈负相关的参数是纳入时和研究期间使用泻药.
    结论:这项研究证明了这种创新的患者定制TAI方案在所有评估评分中的高疗效。值得注意的是,考虑到泻药的负面影响,我们的研究结果表明,限制其在该患者人群中的使用,以进一步提高该手术的疗效.
    BACKGROUND: Continence issues due to organic causes including previous colorectal surgery or neurological issues might benefit from Transanal irrigation (TAI) that proved to be highly effective but with a number of limitations including a relatively high discontinuation rates. Our study was aimed at evaluating the efficacy of an advanced protocol tailored to each patient to prevent dropout and increase satisfaction, independence, and quality of life.
    METHODS: This was a prospective, interventional, multicenter, nonrandomized study involving children aged 4-18 years with bowel dysfunction unresponsive to conventional treatments who required TAI. TAI was performed in accordance to the best standards of care with a total irrigation volume that was determined based on low emission X-Ray barium enemas performed at the very beginning of the study. All patients underwent training and assessments of continence, patients\' perspectives and quality of life were performed at different timepoints from enrollment (T0) up to 6 months since TAI was introduced (T3).
    RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were enrolled. Male to female ratio was 1.4:1. Mean age at enrollment was 106.1 ± 42.8 months. Discontinuation was reported by 3 patients (3.8 %). Continence, satisfaction and a number of other outcome measures increased from baseline (T0) to the last visit (T3). In particular, mean Rintala total score increased linearly from 7.8 to 14.8 during the study period (T0 to T3 timepoints). On a multivariate analysis, the only parameter that proved to be inversely associated with continence as well as with other outcome measures was the use of laxatives at enrollment and during the study.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated the high efficacy of this innovative patient-tailored TAI protocol across all assessed scores. Of note, given the negative impact of laxatives, our findings suggest limiting their use in this patient population to further increase the efficacy of the procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    粪便失禁(FI)是一个主要的健康问题,无论是个人还是卫生系统。很明显,由于所有这些原因,人们普遍关注治愈它,或者,至少,尽可能地减少其众多的不良影响,除了它带来的高成本。要进行的诊断测试有不同的标准,同样适用于最合适的治疗,在近年来激增的众多选择中,并不总是基于严格的科学证据。出于这个原因,西班牙结肠病学协会(AECP)提议起草一项共识,作为对该问题感兴趣的所有卫生专业人员的指南,意识到,然而,治疗决定必须以个人为基础:患者特征/护理团队的经验。对于其开发,采用了标称组技术方法。根据牛津循证医学中心的标准建立证据水平和推荐等级。此外,在分析的每个项目中都简要添加了专家建议。
    Faecal incontinence (FI) is a major health problem, both for individuals and for health systems. It is obvious that, for all these reasons, there is widespread concern for healing it or, at least, reducing as far as possible its numerous undesirable effects, in addition to the high costs it entails. There are different criteria for the diagnostic tests to be carried out and the same applies to the most appropriate treatment, among the numerous options that have proliferated in recent years, not always based on rigorous scientific evidence. For this reason, the Spanish Association of Coloproctology (AECP) proposed to draw up a consensus to serve as a guide for all health professionals interested in the problem, aware, however, that the therapeutic decision must be taken on an individual basis: patient characteristics/experience of the care team. For its development it was adopted the Nominal Group Technique methodology. The Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation were established according to the criteria of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. In addition, expert recommendations were added briefly to each of the items analysed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性便秘是日常临床实践中经常遇到的症状。这种情况的治疗主要依靠使用泻药。然而,患者对这种方法的满意度有限,和替代措施经常被添加到治疗。其中,在世界范围内特别常见的是灌肠剂的使用,尽管关于其科学有效性的文献数据很少。
    在本文中,通过对Medline的广泛在线搜索(通过PubMed),Scopus,科克伦中部,EMBASE,和科学引文索引,关于成人慢性便秘患者使用灌肠剂的现有文献资料,也从治疗这种病理状况的可用指南的角度来看,进行了分析。
    尽管灌肠剂的使用仍然是一种经常使用的方法,并且许多医生认为它作为成人慢性便秘治疗的辅助支持是有用的,这种做法没有严格的科学数据证实,一些研究仅适用于特定的情况(粪便嵌塞,经肛门冲洗)。因此,等待更强大的科学数据,灌肠治疗应在个体患者的基础上进行,根据有爱心的医生的经验。
    UNASSIGNED: Chronic constipation is a frequent symptom encountered in the daily clinical practice. The treatment of this condition mainly relies on the use of laxatives. However, patients\' satisfaction with this approach is limited, and alternative measures are often added to the treatment. Among these, particularly frequent worldwide is the use of enemas, even though literature data on its scientific validity are scarce.
    UNASSIGNED: In this article, by an extensive online search of Medline (through PubMed), Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, and the Science Citation Index, the available literature data on the use of enemas in adult patients with chronic constipation, also in the perspective of available guidelines on treatment of this pathological condition, were analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: Although the use of enemas remains a frequently employed method and it is considered as useful by many physicians as an adjunctive support for the treatment of chronic constipation in adults, this practice is not substantiated by rigorous scientific data, and some studies are available only for specific instances (fecal impaction, transanal irrigation). Thus, waiting for more robust scientific data, enemas treatment should be carried out on an individual patient\'s basis, according to the experience of the caring physicians.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项工作的目的是使用经过验证的症状和生活质量问卷来确定高容量经肛门冲洗(TAI)在便秘和/或大便失禁患者中的临床疗效。
    方法:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,对114名开始TAI的便秘和/或大便失禁患者(罗马IV定义)进行了研究。在基线和第4、12、26和52周随访时完成综合问卷。主要目标是在52周时持续TAI的患者中,症状显着减少[≥30%;克利夫兰临床便秘评分(CCCS)和圣马克斯失禁评分(SMIS)]。次要目标是(1)TAI的延续率,(2)对生活质量(QoL)的影响和(3)持续预测因子的识别。
    结果:共有59例(51.8%)便秘患者,包括26例(22.8%)的大便失禁和29例(25.4%)的共存症状。52周时,41例(36.0%)患者继续TAI,63例(55.2%)患者停止随访,10例(8.8%)患者失访。在那些在52周(n=41)继续TAI的人中,没有观察到便秘症状的减少。便秘患者生活质量评分的中位数在大多数领域都有所下降,表明QoL改善。5/9(55.6%)的大便失禁患者和3/10(30.0%)的同时存在症状的患者大便失禁减少。在有共存症状的患者中,每个个体的SMIS中位数降低(2;四分位数范围0-4;p=0.023)。大便失禁生活质量评分中位数在大多数领域都有所增加,表明QoL改善。没有临床特征预测继续。
    结论:三分之一(n=41)的患者在52周时继续TAI。在那些在52周继续TAI的人中,大便失禁(SMIS)症状减轻,但便秘(CCCS)症状不明显.与便秘和大便失禁相关的QoL改善。没有临床特征预测继续。
    The aim of this work was to determine the clinical efficacy of high-volume transanal irrigation (TAI) in patients with constipation and/or faecal incontinence using validated symptom and quality of life questionnaires.
    This was a prospective cohort study of 114 consecutive patients with constipation and/or faecal incontinence (Rome IV defined) who started TAI. A comprehensive questionnaire was completed at baseline and 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeks\' follow-up. The primary objective was significant symptom reduction [≥30%; Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS) and St Marks Incontinence Score (SMIS)] in those who continued TAI at 52 weeks. Secondary objectives were (1) continuation rates of TAI, (2) effect on quality of life (QoL) and (3) identification of predictors for continuation.
    A total of 59 (51.8%) patients with constipation, 26 (22.8%) with faecal incontinence and 29 (25.4%) with coexistent symptoms were included. At 52 weeks, 41 (36.0%) patients continued TAI, 63 (55.2%) stopped and 10 (8.8%) patients were lost to follow-up. In those who continued TAI at 52 weeks (n = 41), no reduction of constipation symptoms was observed. Median Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life scores decreased on most domains, indicating QoL improvement. Reduction of faecal incontinence occurred in 5/9 (55.6%) patients with faecal incontinence and in 3/10 (30.0%) patients with coexistent symptoms. The median SMIS per-individual decreased in patients with coexistent symptoms (2; interquartile range 0-4; p = 0.023). Median Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scores increased in most domains, indicating improved QoL. No clinical characteristics predicted continuation.
    One-third (n = 41) of patients continued TAI at 52 weeks. In those who continued TAI at 52 weeks, symptoms of faecal incontinence (SMIS) were reduced but not constipation (CCCS). QoL related to both constipation and faecal incontinence improved. No clinical characteristics predicted continuation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    目的:评估功能性便秘(FC)患者经肛门冲洗(TAI)短期(6个月)治疗的潜在益处,功能性大便失禁(FI),和低位前切除综合征(LARS)。
    方法:进行了一项多中心观察性研究(12个中心;369名患者),以评估以下主要和次要目标:评估对肠道控制和生活质量(QoL)的满意度;评估肠道症状的严重程度,脱落频率和原因。为了这个目标,在使用医疗器械Peristeen®Plus(ColoplastA/S,丹麦)。进行统计分析以比较在T0和T6获得的结果。
    结果:使用TAI治疗6个月,QoL评分有统计学意义(p<0.05)的改善,关于肠道控制的满意度评分,和患有FC的患者的障碍相关症状的严重程度指数,FI,和LARS。全球范围内,由于出现症状(2.4%)或其他理由(3.8%),例如个人原因,8.0%的患者在6个月后停止治疗。没有一个辍学是由于治疗无效。
    结论:本研究的结果表明,短期TAI治疗对患有功能性肠病和LARS的患者有益。未来对前瞻性数据的分析将集中在处理这些类型的医疗条件时,与长期使用TAI(长达24个月)相关的临床结果。
    To evaluate the potential benefits associated with the short-term (6 months) treatment with transanal irrigation (TAI) in patients suffering from functional constipation (FC), functional fecal incontinence (FI), and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS).
    A multicenter observational study (12 centers; 369 patients) was conducted to assess the following primary and secondary objectives: to evaluate the level of satisfaction regarding bowel control and quality of life (QoL); to evaluate bowel symptoms severity and dropout frequency and reason. To this aim, validated questionnaires were provided to the patients at baseline (T0) and after 6 months of TAI treatment (T6) performed with the medical device Peristeen® Plus (Coloplast A/S, Denmark). Statistical analyses were conducted to compare the outcomes obtained at T0 and T6.
    A 6-month treatment with TAI enabled a statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement of QoL scores, satisfaction scores regarding bowel control, and severity indexes of disorder-related symptoms in patients suffering from FC, FI, and LARS. Globally, 8.0% of patients discontinued the treatment after 6 months as a result of occurrence of symptoms (2.4%) or other justifications (3.8%) such as personal reasons. None of the dropouts were due to treatment inefficacy.
    Results of the present study suggest that short-term TAI treatment is beneficial for patients suffering from functional bowel disorders and LARS. Future analysis of prospective data will focus on the clinical outcomes associated with the long-term use (up to 24 months) of TAI when dealing with these types of medical conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号