trans health

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    跨性别者有不同的生活经历,其中可能包括性别确认护理(GAC)。GAC积极影响跨性别成年人的生活质量。然而,他们经常遇到护理障碍,在医疗保健系统中特别脆弱。围绕GAC的需求和期望可能因个体患者而异。本文旨在分析跨性别成年人的看法,期望,以及对GAC的建议。由学术和同行研究人员组成的团队进行了27次半结构化访谈;然后使用码本和主题分析对转录访谈进行了分析。确定了三个主要主题;GAC的解放经验;患者和提供者之间的知识和权力分配不均;以及GAC的推荐做法。额外的培训和研究是必要的,以促进高质量的护理跨成人访问GAC。
    Trans people have diverse life experiences which may include gender-affirming care (GAC). GAC positively impacts the quality of life of trans adults. However, they are often met with barriers to care and are particularly vulnerable within the healthcare system. The needs and expectations surrounding GAC may vary between individual patients. This article aims to analyze trans adults\' perceptions, expectations, and recommendations on GAC. Twenty-seven semi-structured interviews were conducted by a team of academic and peer researchers; transcribed interviews were then analyzed using a codebook and thematic analysis. Three main themes were identified; the liberating experience of GAC; the uneven distribution of knowledge and power between patients and providers; and the recommended practices in GAC. Additional training and research are necessary to facilitate high-quality care for trans adults accessing GAC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在了解跨性别健康需求方面取得了进展,但是研究重点通常是由政策或医疗保健专业人员设定的,没有反式输入,这可能无法反映公众的需求。我们的研究试图从研究人员和跨性别社区中确定法国的跨性别健康研究重点。
    专家利益相关者(健康和社会科学专业人员,跨性别个体,及其家人)回答了关于跨健康研究优先事项的三轮Delphi调查。第一轮涉及一份不限成员名额的问卷,定性分析。在第二轮中,参与者使用李克特量表对第一轮的研究命题进行排名。该研究的第二阶段涉及与专家和跨性别人士进行的两个小时的研讨会。
    53名参与者(32%的跨性别者/亲属,60%的卫生专业人员)对开放式问题做出了217份答复,导致44个研究重点。两轮投票后,共有五项提案达成了强有力的共识,并被视为主要研究重点:评估跨性别儿童和青少年使用青春期阻滞剂的效果(95%),支持跨性别儿童和青少年的效果评估(92%),研究跨性别青年及其父母可用的支持系统(86%),青春期前后跨性别认同的持续存在(患病率,持续的人的特征)(86%),和对青少年及其家庭的支持的需求评估调查(83%)。其他13项建议被认为是中等优先事项。
    我们法国研究的主要共识是关于跨青年护理和支持需求的研究。我们的研究结果可以指导进一步的跨健康研究,以满足公众的需求和愿望。
    Progress has been made in understanding trans health needs, but research priorities are often set by policy or healthcare professionals without trans input, which may not reflect public needs. Our study sought to identify trans health research priorities in France from both researchers and the trans community.
    Expert stakeholders (health and social sciences professionals, trans individuals, and their families) answered a three-round Delphi survey on trans health research priorities. The first round involved an open-ended questionnaire, analyzed qualitatively. In the second round, participants ranked research propositions from round one using a Likert scale. The study\'s second phase involved a two-hour workshop with experts and trans individuals.
    53 participants (32% trans individuals/relatives, 60% health professionals) contributed 217 responses to open-ended questions, leading to 44 research priorities. After the two voting rounds, a total of five proposals reached a strong consensus cut-off and were considered as the main research priorities: evaluation of the effect of puberty blocker use in trans children and adolescents (95%), evaluation of the effect of supporting trans children and adolescents (92%), study of the support systems available for trans youth and their parents (86%), persistence of trans identity around puberty (prevalence, persistent persons characteristics) (86%), and needs assessment survey of the support for adolescents and their families (83%). Thirteen other proposals were considered moderate priorities.
    The main consensus in our French study concerned research on trans-youth care and support needs. Our results may guide further trans-health research that meets the public\'s needs and desires.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    免疫系统的运作方式存在很好的性别差异。特别是,顺式(顺式)女性具有更容易激活的免疫系统;与疫苗接种后自身免疫性疾病和不良事件的患病率增加有关。相反,顺式男性有较高的免疫激活阈值,并且更容易患某些传染病,如冠状病毒病(COVID-19)。雌激素和睾酮具有免疫调节特性,这些可能会导致免疫系统的性二态性。还有位于X染色体上的重要免疫相关基因,例如toll样受体(TLR)7/8;并且此类基因的镶嵌双等位基因表达可能有助于顺式雌性的免疫过度活化状态。科学文献强烈表明,免疫系统功能的性别差异与X连锁基因和性激素的免疫调节有关。然而,目前尚不清楚这如何影响接受性别确认激素治疗的跨性别者。此外,据估计,在澳大利亚,至少2.3%的青少年认为跨性别和/或性别多样化,每年都在增加转介给性别确认专科护理。尽管跨性别者的社会意识不断提高,他们在科学文献中的代表性长期不足。此外,少数案例研究描述了成年跨性别女性在使用雌激素后出现的新的自身免疫性疾病。然而,目前很少有针对跨性别者的免疫学长期研究。因此,为了确保跨性别者的积极健康结果,进一步研究性激素在免疫调节中的作用至关重要。
    There are well-described sex-based differences in how the immune system operates. In particular, cisgender (cis) females have a more easily activated immune system; associated with an increased prevalence of autoimmune diseases and adverse events following vaccinations. Conversely, cis males have a higher threshold for immune activation, and are more prone to certain infectious diseases, such as coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Oestrogen and testosterone have immune-modulatory properties, and it is likely that these contribute to the sexual dimorphism of the immune system. There are also important immune-related genes located on the X chromosome, such as toll-like receptor (TLR) 7/8; and the mosaic bi-allelic expression of such genes may contribute to the state of immune hyperactivation in cis females. The scientific literature strongly suggests that sex-based differences in the functioning of the immune system are related to both X-linked genes and immune modulation by sex hormones. However, it is currently not clear how this impacts transgender (trans) people receiving gender-affirming hormonal therapy. Moreover, it is estimated that in Australia, at least 2.3% of adolescents identify as trans and/or gender diverse, and referrals to specialist gender-affirming care are increasing each year. Despite the improving social awareness of trans people, they remain chronically underrepresented in the scientific literature. In addition, a small number of case studies describe new onset autoimmune disorders in adult trans females following oestrogen use. However, there is currently minimal long-term research with an immunological focus on trans people. Therefore, to ensure the positive health outcomes of trans people, it is crucial that the role of sex hormones in immune modulation is investigated further.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19大流行继续对世界各地日常生活的各个方面产生前所未有的影响。然而,那些具有历史上和当前边缘化身份的人(即,性别或种族)已经经历了广泛的结构性不平等现象的人受到了不成比例的影响。LTNB是一个特别危险的人群,因为他们处于种族/种族的交汇点,性别认同,语言,迁移状态,地理位置,其中,这可能会进一步增加他们的COVID-19和其他与健康相关的风险和差距。这项研究的目的是检查健康的关键社会决定因素的影响(即,性别认同,国家,健康保险,就业)在LTNB个人样本中。
    该团队使用安全Web平台REDcap和SurveyMonkey,通过在线调查技术实现了横截面探索性设计。共有133名参与者完成了在线调查。大多数样本自我认定为跨性别女性(38.8%),transmen(26.3%),21至72岁之间的非二进制(21.8%)。所有参与者都是居住在波多黎各(47.7%)或美国大陆(52.3%)的拉丁裔。描述性统计,可靠性测试,进行了Mann-Whitney和快速专题分析测试。
    研究结果表明,大多数参与者总是(38.1%)或几乎总是(33.3%)担心感染COVID-19。居住在波多黎各的个人报告说,在COVID-19对社会心理的影响方面,他们比居住在美国大陆的人遇到更多的困难,情感,以及与COVID相关的思维。大多数参与者对COVID-19开放式问题的回答集中在三个主要领域:收入,获得跨肯定医疗保健,和应对策略。
    研究结果表明,尽管大多数LTNB参与者在生活的多个方面受到COVID-19大流行的负面影响,与美国大陆相比,生活在波多黎各的人经历了不同的经历。需要更多的研究来更好地了解这种背景对LTNB健康和福祉的具体影响的机制和途径。特别是在波多黎各。这项研究可以帮助制定公共卫生对策,同时考虑到地理位置和其他在不平等现象的产生和繁殖中起关键作用的交叉身份。
    The COVID-19 pandemic continues to generate an unprecedented impact on all aspects of everyday life across the world. However, those with historically and currently marginalized identities (i.e., gender or ethnicity) who already experience a wide range of structural inequities have been disproportionally impacted. LTNB are a particularly at-risk population as they lie at the intersection of race/ethnicity, gender identity, language, migration status, geographical location, among others, which could further increase their COVID-19 and other health-related risks and disparities. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of key social determinants of health (i.e., gender identity, country, health insurance, employment) among a sample of LTNB individuals.
    The team implemented a cross-sectional exploratory design with an online survey technique using the secure web platforms REDcap and SurveyMonkey. A total of 133 participants completed the online survey. Most of the sample self-identified as transwomen (38.8%), transmen (26.3%), and non-binary (21.8%) between the ages of 21 to 72. All participants were Latinx living in either Puerto Rico (47.7%) or mainland United States (52.3%). Descriptive statistics, reliability tests, Mann-Whitney and rapid thematic analysis test were conducted.
    Findings show that most participants were always (38.1%) or almost always (33.3%) worried about contracting COVID-19. Individuals living in Puerto Rico reported more difficulties than those residing in the mainland US regarding COVID-19 impact on psychosocial, emotional, and COVID-related thinking. Most participants\' answers for the COVID-19 open-ended questions focused on three main domains: income, access to trans-affirmative health care, and coping strategies.
    Findings evidence that although most of LTNB participants were negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in multiple aspects of their lives, those living in Puerto Rico experienced these differently when compared to those in mainland US. More research is needed to understand better the mechanisms and pathways through which this context specifically impacts LTNB health and wellbeing, particularly in Puerto Rico. This study could help shape the public health response taking into account the geographical location and other intersectional identities that play critical roles in the production and reproduction of inequities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文由一组反式和非二元研究人员以及反式健康领域的专家组成,他们对反式健康研究需求进行了分析。
    突出需要进一步研究的主题,并概述在我们领域进行研究的人员的关键考虑因素。
    第一作者对所有合著者进行了半结构化访谈,这些被用来创建这份手稿的初稿。这份草案分发给所有作者,进行编辑,直到作者达成共识。
    需要更全面的长期研究,将跨性别者的经验集中在性别确认激素和手术的风险和收益上。跨性别健康研究领域还需要有一个更广泛的焦点,超越医学转型或性别肯定,包括一般健康和常规医疗保健;跨性别者的生活没有,之前,在医学性别确认之后;和性行为,生育力,和生殖保健需求。还需要对健康的社会决定因素进行更多的研究,包括使医疗机构和其他环境更安全和更有支持性的方法;社会和法律性别认可;最边缘化的跨性别者的需求;以及跨性别社区内愈合的方式。本文的第二部分强调了研究人员的关键考虑因素,最重要的是承认跨性别社区的专业知识,并将跨性别社区成员“投入到研究设计和研究结果的解释中,担任顾问和/或研究员。道德考虑包括最大限度地提高利益和最大限度地减少危害(福利)和透明度和问责制跨社区。最后,我们注意到会议的重要性,赠款资金,与学生一起工作,和多学科团队。
    本文概述了需要进一步考虑的主题和问题,以使跨性别健康研究领域对跨性别者的需求更加敏感。这项工作受限于我们的作者群体主要是白人,都是英语,居住在全球北部。
    UNASSIGNED: This article is by a group of trans and nonbinary researchers and experts in the field of trans health who have conducted an analysis of trans health research needs.
    UNASSIGNED: To highlight topics that need further research and to outline key considerations for those conducting research in our field.
    UNASSIGNED: The first author conducted semi-structured interviews with all coauthors, and these were used to create a first draft of this manuscript. This draft was circulated to all authors, with edits made until consensus was reached among the authors.
    UNASSIGNED: More comprehensive long-term research that centers trans people\'s experiences is needed on the risks and benefits of gender affirming hormones and surgeries. The trans health research field also needs to have a broader focus beyond medical transition or gender affirmation, including general health and routine healthcare; trans people\'s lives without, before, and after medical gender affirmation; and sexuality, fertility, and reproductive healthcare needs. More research is also needed on social determinants of health, including ways to make healthcare settings and other environments safer and more supportive; social and legal gender recognition; the needs of trans people who are most marginalized; and the ways in which healing happens within trans communities. The second part of this article highlights key considerations for researchers, the foremost being acknowledging trans community expertise and centering trans community members\' input into research design and interpretation of findings, in advisory and/or researcher roles. Ethical considerations include maximizing benefits and minimizing harms (beneficence) and transparency and accountability to trans communities. Finally, we note the importance of conferences, grant funding, working with students, and multidisciplinary teams.
    UNASSIGNED: This article outlines topics and issues needing further consideration to make the field of trans health research more responsive to the needs of trans people. This work is limited by our authorship group being mostly White, all being Anglophone, and residing in the Global North.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:性别确认医疗保健对于跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)患者至关重要,在大流行期间,获得医疗保健变得具有挑战性。假设许多人的程序被推迟了,我们试图描述大流行对TGD患者的影响.
    方法:采用混合方法方法,结合调查和访谈;杜克大学患者通过ICD-10代码识别,而非杜克大学(国家)患者是通过在线社交媒体招募的。
    结果:在大流行期间,所有专业都增加了远程医疗的使用。杜克大学的手术患者报告说,远程医疗接入增加了近三倍。24%的杜克大学和20%的全国患者报告了COVID-19症状;紧急护理的障碍包括害怕歧视(27%)。
    结论:所有护理领域都经历了延迟,部分缓解了远程医疗。近三分之一的患者认为歧视是护理的障碍。尽管与大流行相关的远程医疗扩展可能是成功的标志,重大障碍仍然使医疗保健的提供复杂化。
    Gender-affirming healthcare is vital for transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients, and during the pandemic, accessing healthcare became challenging. Hypothesizing that many had procedures postponed, we sought to characterize the impact of the pandemic on TGD patients.
    A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining surveys and interviews; Duke patients were identified by ICD-10 codes, while non-Duke (national) patients were recruited through online social media.
    All specialties increased telemedicine usage during the pandemic. Duke surgical patients reported a nearly three-fold increase in telemedicine access. COVID-19 symptoms were reported by 24% of Duke and 20% of national patients; barriers to urgent care included the fear of discrimination (27%).
    Delays were experienced in all domains of care, mitigated in part by telemedicine. Nearly one-third of patients cite discrimination as a barrier to care. Though pandemic-related expansion of telemedicine may be a marker of success, significant barriers still complicate delivery of healthcare.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该项目旨在探索LGBTQ+成员在萨斯喀彻温省获得医疗保健服务时感知到的不信任和污名的经历,加拿大。与当地组织合作,采用了基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)方法,进行了半结构化的描述性访谈。招募了16名年龄在20-60岁之间的参与者并进行了采访。采用专题数据分析的归纳编码方法,并产生了描述性综合结果。LGBTQ+社区在四个新兴主题的背景下报告了负面经历:(a)在医疗保健环境中感知到的污名和歧视,(B)从业人员“LGBTQ+特定的医疗保健知识,(c)需要LGBTQ+特定的文化敏感性和包容性,(d)呼吁改变医疗政策。每个主题及其相应的经验都是信息的基线,以证明LGBTQ社区成员需要改善获得安全医疗保健和增加可持续健康的必要性。这需要培训和教育,建立文化敏感性,强制政策变更可以改善LGBTQ+社区成员的体验。
    This project aimed to explore the experiences of perceived mistrust and stigma by the LGBTQ+ members while accessing healthcare services in Saskatchewan, Canada. In partnership with local organization, a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach was employed and, semi structured descriptive interviews were conducted. Sixteen participants ranging from age 20-60 were recruited and interviewed. Inductive coding method with thematic data analysis was performed, and descriptive comprehensive results were produced. The LGBTQ+ community reported negative experiences within the context of four emerging themes: (a) perceived stigma and discrimination in healthcare settings, (b) practitioners\' LGBTQ+-specific healthcare knowledge, (c) the need for LGBTQ+-specific cultural sensitivity and inclusion, and (d) a call for changes in healthcare policy. Each theme and its corresponding experiences serve as a baseline of information to demonstrate the need for improved access to safe healthcare and increased sustainable health for the LGBTQ+ community members. This calls for training and education, establishing cultural sensitivity, and mandating policy changes could improve the experiences of the LGBTQ+ community members.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的十年中,研究工作的增加提供了对出生时分配给女性的跨性别和性别多样化个体(TGDAFAB)的多样化生育愿望和计划生育需求的更深入了解。尽管有了更多的了解和未满足的需求,全球健康研究人员和避孕产品开发商尚未将TGDAFAB个人及其需求考虑纳入产品开发过程,边缘化这个历史上代表性不足的人口。这种观点的目的是提出将TGDAFAB个体纳入避孕研究的案例。
    这个观点总结了TGDAFAB人群中避孕药具的获取和使用以及使用障碍的最新文献。此外,这一观点提供了对研发管道中的新型避孕技术如何潜在地吸引TGDAFAB人群的见解,并建议了产品开发人员可以采取的步骤来提高包容性.
    目前在避孕产品开发方面的研究工作旨在扩大避孕方法组合,以吸引更多样化的潜在用户,它有责任产品开发人员在开发过程中更加包容TGDAFAB个人,并将他们视为扩大避孕方法组合的利益相关者。
    UNASSIGNED: Increased research efforts over the past decade provide a more in-depth understanding of the diverse fertility desires and family planning needs of trans and gender diverse individuals assigned female at birth (TGD AFAB). Despite this increased understanding and unmet need, global health researchers and contraceptive product developers have yet to include TGD AFAB individuals and considerations of their needs in the product development process, marginalising this historically underrepresented population. The aim of this perspective is to present the case for inclusion of TGD AFAB individuals in contraceptive research.
    UNASSIGNED: This perspective summarises the most recent literature characterising contraceptive access and use within TGD AFAB populations as well as the barriers to use. Furthermore, this perspective offers insight into how novel contraceptive technologies in the research and development pipeline could potentially appeal to TGD AFAB populations and recommends steps product developers can make towards being more inclusive.
    UNASSIGNED: With current research efforts in contraceptive product development aimed at expanding the method mix to appeal to a more diverse population of potential users, it behoves product developers to be more inclusive of TGD AFAB individuals in the development process and consider them as stakeholders of an expanded contraceptive method mix.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    变性人和不符合性别的人和老年人的能见度正在增加;然而,到目前为止,很少考虑两组的重叠。因此,在老年人的护理和医学背景下,跨性别者在很大程度上仍然看不见。这一群体面临的歧视至少是双重的:他们是跨性别恐惧症煽动的侵略目标,还有年龄歧视。尽管年龄较大的跨性别和性别不合格的人在另一个已经边缘化的群体中作为一个大大边缘化的群体存在,甚至神学伦理学领域也忽略了给予他们伦理上的关注。由于他们的特殊脆弱性,这对变性人和性别不合格的老年人造成了特别严重的后果。有来自跨性别者的报告,由于在医疗环境中经常经历恐惧症,他们决心再也不使用卫生服务。在这种情况下,跨性别和性别不合格问题中有宗教成分不应忽视。一方面,医务人员,以他们基督教信仰的名义,拒绝为跨性别者提供基本医疗服务。另一方面,对能见度的要求,和个人的空间,定期在反式阳性研究中进行,并且可以与神学伦理学中关于给予空间的讨论联系起来。希伯来语和基督教传统中的一些伦理公式侧重于创造其他生物可能存在的空间,就像兄弟姐妹关系这样的概念,友谊,安息日。通过揭示老年人的跨性别和性别不合格的人,以及他们对空间的需求,通过对空间制造伦理概念的反思,这项研究对老年跨性别者的空间有了具体的理解。本文旨在加深对神学伦理学和应用伦理学中的跨积极空间的理解。假设所有以前通过无知占据跨空间的人退缩或收缩的空间,蔑视,或者暴力,不应该因此成为缺席的空间:事实上,老年变性和性别不合格的人可能需要这两种空间,那些可以让人退缩的地方,以及那些继续帮助他人的人。
    Visibility for transgender and gender nonconforming people and the elderly is growing; however, thus far the overlap of the two groups has rarely been considered. Trans persons therefore remain largely invisible in the context of older people\'s care and medicine. The discrimination faced by this group is at least twofold: they are the targets of aggression incited by transphobia, and also by ageism. Although older trans and gender nonconforming people exist as a greatly marginalized group within another already marginalized group, even the field of theological ethics has neglected to grant them ethical attention. This leads to especially harsh consequences for elderly transgender and gender nonconforming people due to their specific vulnerabilities. There are reports from trans persons who have resolved never to make use of health services again due to regular experiences of transphobia in medical settings. There are religious components within transgender and gender nonconforming issues that should not be overlooked in this context. On the one hand, medical staff, in the name of their Christian beliefs, have refused to provide trans persons with basic medical care. On the other hand, demands for places of visibility, and spaces for the individual, are regularly made in trans-positive studies, and can be linked to discussions within theological ethics about giving space. Some ethical formulas within the Hebrew and Christian traditions focus on the creation of space in which other beings may exist, as found in concepts like brother-sisterhood, friendship, and Sabbath. By casting light on elderly trans and gender nonconforming people, and on their demands for space, via reflections on ethical concepts of space-making, this study develops a specific understanding of space for elderly trans persons. The paper aims to develop an understanding of trans-positive spaces within theological ethics and applied ethics. Spaces that assume a withdrawal or contraction by all those who have previously taken up trans spaces through ignorance, contempt, or violence, should not thereby become spaces of absence: indeed, elderly trans and gender nonconforming people might be in need of both kinds of spaces, those where otherness enables withdrawal, and those where the helping presence of others continues.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Historical Article
    本文探讨了对跨性别者性别认同的认可如何对其生殖健康和权利产生负面影响。首先,它认为,虽然性别认同权和性健康和生殖健康权都是人权不可分割的核心,实际上,跨性别者被迫在他们之间做出选择。理解这种情况需要关注跨政策的优生维度,即使在某些州,除出生时分配的性别认同外,对性别认同的认可也与手术或激素妥协无关。“被动优生学”的概念,二十年前詹姆斯·鲍曼创造的,在这方面提供了一个宝贵的关键。第二,该文件强调了一些阻碍跨性别者成功实现生殖健康和权利的因素。这些因素包括:关于跨性别者生殖能力和欲望的规范形象,关于怀孕和“女性”的陈述,以及当代女权运动中身份政治所采取的形式。作为优先事项(如果不是专门)关注自愿堕胎合法化的倡议,被理解为与(顺式)妇女有关的权利,提供了这些困难的一个重要例子。最后,该文件主张在性健康和生殖健康及权利方面采用生殖司法方法,争论它有,在其他美德中,挑战表征西方思想的二元矩阵。
    This article explores how the recognition of the gender identity of trans people can have negative consequences on their reproductive health and rights. First, it argues that, while both the right to gender identity and the right to sexual and reproductive health are part of the indivisible core of human rights, in practice trans people are forced to choose between them. Understanding this scenario requires focusing on the eugenic dimensions of trans policies, even in states where the recognition of a gender identity other than that assigned at birth is not tied to surgical or hormonal compromises. The concept of \"passive eugenics\", coined over twenty years ago by James Bowman, offers a valuable key in this respect. Second, the paper highlights some factors that hinder a successful approach to the reproductive health and rights of trans people. These factors include: the normative imageries about the reproductive capacities and desires of trans people, representations about pregnancy and \"womanhood\", and the form taken by identity politics in contemporary feminist movements. The attention given as a priority (if not exclusively) to initiatives for the legalisation of voluntary abortion, understood as a right pertaining to (cis) women, offers a significant example of these difficulties. Finally, the paper advocates the adoption of a reproductive justice approach to work on sexual and reproductive health and rights, arguing that it has, among other virtues, that of challenging the binary matrix that characterises Western thought.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号