tissue compartment model

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:绝对心肌血流量(MBF)和心肌血流储备(MFR)的非侵入性量化为相对心肌灌注成像(MPI)诊断和管理心脏病提供了递增的益处。可以使用单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)测量MBF,但是测量值的不确定性很高。SPECTMBF测量方案的标准化和优化将提高该技术的一致性。处理协议的一个要素是用于分析动态图像系列的动力学模型的选择。
    目的:本研究评估净示踪剂保留模型(RET)是否比单室模型(1CM)对SPECTMBF提供更好的数据拟合和更高的测试-重测精度,带(+MC)和不带(-MC)手动运动校正。
    方法:将先前获得的静息应激MBF研究(31个SPECT-PET和30个SPECT-SPECT)的数据再处理±MC。使用1CM和RET提取速率常数(K1),+/-MC,并使用交叉验证与标准PETMBF测量进行配对比较,以获得用于将SPECT速率常数转换为MBF的校准参数,并评估校准曲线的拟合优度。精度(测试变异系数重新测试相对差异,使用重复SPECTMBF研究的数据计算1CM和RET±MC的流量测量值的COV)。
    结果:RET模型和MC都提高了SPECTMBF校准曲线对PET的拟合优度。所有模型与PET相比产生最小偏差(平均偏差<0.6%)。SPECT-SPECTMBFCOV从34%(1CM+MC)显著提高到28%(RET+MC,p=0.008)。
    结论:与1CM相比,RET+MC模型为PET和血流测量提供了更好的SPECT校准,没有准确性的损失。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
    BACKGROUND: Noninvasive quantification of absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) provides incremental benefit to relative myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) to diagnose and manage heart disease. MBF can be measured with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) but the uncertainty in the measured values is high. Standardization and optimization of protocols for SPECT MBF measurements will improve the consistency of this technique. One element of the processing protocol is the choice of kinetic model used to analyze the dynamic image series.
    OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates if a net tracer retention model (RET) will provide a better fit to the acquired data and greater test-retest precision than a one-compartment model (1CM) for SPECT MBF, with (+MC) and without (-MC) manual motion correction.
    METHODS: Data from previously acquired rest-stress MBF studies (31 SPECT-PET and 30 SPECT-SPECT) were reprocessed ± MC. Rate constants (K1) were extracted using 1CM and RET, +/-MC, and compared pairwise with standard PET MBF measurements using cross-validation to obtain calibration parameters for converting SPECT rate constants to MBF and to assess the goodness-of-fit of the calibration curves. Precision (coefficient of variation of test re-test relative differences, COV) of flow measurements was computed for 1CM and RET ± MC using data from the repeated SPECT MBF studies.
    RESULTS: Both the RET model and MC improved the goodness-of-fit of the SPECT MBF calibration curves to PET. All models produced minimal bias compared with PET (mean bias < 0.6%). The SPECT-SPECT MBF COV significantly improved from 34% (1CM+MC) to 28% (RET+MC, P = 0.008).
    CONCLUSIONS: The RET+MC model provides a better calibration of SPECT to PET and blood flow measurements with better precision than the 1CM, without loss of accuracy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:通过正电子发射断层扫描(PET-MPI)进行的心肌灌注成像是当前量化心肌血流量的金标准。18F-flurpiridaz最近被引入作为当前使用的PET-MPI探针的有效替代品。尽管如此,图像分析的最佳扫描持续时间和时间间隔目前未知。Further,目前尚不清楚在小鼠中使用18F-flurpiridaz的休息/应激PET-MPI是否可行。
    方法:在27只7-8月龄小鼠中使用18F-flurpiridaz(0.6-3.0MBq)进行休息/应激PET-MPI。Regadenoson(0.1µg/g)用于诱导血管扩张剂应激。使用代谢物校正的动脉输入功能进行动力学建模。通过在左心室心肌中放置感兴趣的体积,在不同的时间间隔内评估图像衍生的心肌18F-flurpiridaz摄取。
    结果:示踪剂动力学最好通过双组织区室模型来描述。K1范围为6.7至20.0mL·cm-3·min-1,而心肌分布体积(VT)为34.6至83.6mL·cm-3。值得注意的是,在所有评估的时间间隔内,静息时和药理学血管舒张后,心肌18F-flurpiridaz摄取(%ID/g)与K1显著相关.然而,虽然Spearman系数(rs)介于0.478和0.681之间,但R2值普遍较低。相比之下,获得了心肌18F-flurpiridaz摄取与VT的极好相关性,特别是当使用示踪剂注射后20至40分钟的平均心肌摄取时(R2≥0.98)。值得注意的是,K1和VT对药理学血管舒张诱导同样敏感。Further,K1、VT、和%ID/g18F-flurpiridaz几乎相同,提示%ID/g18F-flurpiridaz可用于估计小鼠冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,对相对心肌灌注和CFR的简化评估,基于图像衍生的示踪剂摄取,在小鼠中使用18F-flurpiridaz是可行的,在啮齿动物中实现高通量机械CFR研究。
    Myocardial perfusion imaging by positron emission tomography (PET-MPI) is the current gold standard for quantification of myocardial blood flow. 18F-flurpiridaz was recently introduced as a valid alternative to currently used PET-MPI probes. Nonetheless, optimum scan duration and time interval for image analysis are currently unknown. Further, it is unclear whether rest/stress PET-MPI with 18F-flurpiridaz is feasible in mice.
    Rest/stress PET-MPI was performed with 18F-flurpiridaz (0.6-3.0 MBq) in 27 mice aged 7-8 months. Regadenoson (0.1 µg/g) was used for induction of vasodilator stress. Kinetic modeling was performed using a metabolite-corrected arterial input function. Image-derived myocardial 18F-flurpiridaz uptake was assessed for different time intervals by placing a volume of interest in the left ventricular myocardium.
    Tracer kinetics were best described by a two-tissue compartment model. K1 ranged from 6.7 to 20.0 mL·cm-3·min-1, while myocardial volumes of distribution (VT) were between 34.6 and 83.6 mL·cm-3. Of note, myocardial 18F-flurpiridaz uptake (%ID/g) was significantly correlated with K1 at rest and following pharmacological vasodilation for all time intervals assessed. However, while Spearman\'s coefficients (rs) ranged between 0.478 and 0.681, R2 values were generally low. In contrast, an excellent correlation of myocardial 18F-flurpiridaz uptake with VT was obtained, particularly when employing the averaged myocardial uptake from 20 to 40 min post tracer injection (R2 ≥ 0.98). Notably, K1 and VT were similarly sensitive to pharmacological vasodilation induction. Further, mean stress-to-rest ratios of K1, VT, and %ID/g 18F-flurpiridaz were virtually identical, suggesting that %ID/g 18F-flurpiridaz can be used to estimate coronary flow reserve (CFR) in mice.
    Our findings suggest that a simplified assessment of relative myocardial perfusion and CFR, based on image-derived tracer uptake, is feasible with 18F-flurpiridaz in mice, enabling high-throughput mechanistic CFR studies in rodents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号