使用Faustmann框架中扩展的全循环碳模型,这允许在同一森林区域同时实施几种用途的管理策略,本文研究了对越南人工林有利和最佳的管理目标的选择。考虑了三种情况:情况1调查了将木材的土地经济价值(LEV)最大化为单一生产的管理目标。情景2调查了木材和生物能源的联合生产。情景3分析了木材的联合生产,生物能源生产,和碳封存。研究结果表明,如果种植者追求木材管理目标(情景1),农业业务仅在政府资助的8.4%信贷计划下提供可观的收益。对于商业银行15.24%的较高的非补贴利率,在私人信贷来源的平均利率为19.08%的情况下,这种收益大幅减少,变成负值。将管理目标改为联合生产木材和原始生物能源生产(方案2)将使LEV适度提高,但以木材生产和碳储量为代价。然而,木材和碳平衡的减少趋势并不大,主要是由于生物能源生产与木材生产相比比例相对较小;因此,以碳吸收为目标的决策框架可能能够纳入这样的冲突水平。将森林的碳值进一步内化为经营目标一般会导致更长的轮作长度,从而提高碳固存和收入收益。将目前以木材为主的管理目标转向联合生产木材和生物能源,或者,或者,联合生产木材,生物能源生产,和碳封存,当碳市场出现时,是越南森林管理的一个很好的替代战略。
Using an extended full-cycle carbon model from the Faustmann framework, which allows for management strategies of several uses concurrently implemented in the same area of forest, this paper investigates the selection of management objectives that are beneficial and optimal for forest plantations in Vietnam. Three scenarios are considered: Scenario 1 investigates the management objective of maximizing the land economic value (LEV) of timber as a single production. Scenario 2 investigates the joint production of
timber and bioenergy sources. Scenario 3 analyzes the joint production of
timber, bioenergy production, and carbon sequestration. The findings reveal that if growers pursue a
timber management objective (Scenario 1), the farming business only provides considerable benefits under the government-subsidized credit scheme of 8.4%. For a higher non-subsidized interest rate of 15.24% of commercial banks, such gains reduce substantially and become negative value under the mean interest rate of 19.08% of private credit sources. Altering the management objective to a joint production of
timber and raw bioenergy production (Scenario 2) will boost the LEV by a moderate level, but at the expense of timber production and thus carbon stock. However, the reduction tendency of timber and carbon balance is not substantial due mainly to the relatively small proportion of bioenergy production compared to timber production; therefore, decision-making frameworks targeting carbon uptake may be capable of incorporating such levels of confliction. Further internalizing the carbon value of the forest into management objectives generally leads to a longer rotation length, thus improving both carbon sequestration and income gains. Shifting the current
timber-dominant management objective to a joint production of
timber and bioenergy sources, or, alternatively, a joint production of timber, bioenergy production, and carbon sequestration when the carbon market is emerging, is a good alternative strategy for forest management in Vietnam.