OBJECTIVE: Limited data exist on the safety of IV thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of idarucizumab pretreatment in patients with AIS receiving IVT.
METHODS: A national registry-based study evaluated the safety and efficacy of IVT in this specific subgroup. We also conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies and case series, aiming to document the pooled rates of (1) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), (2) any intracranial hemorrhage, (3) 3-month mortality, and (4) the proportion of excellent (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores 0-1) and (5) good (mRS scores 0-2) functional outcome at 3 months among patients with AIS, who received IVT after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab. Moreover, we sought to compare these outcomes between IVT-treated patients after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab and IVT-treated patients without dabigatran pretreatment.
RESULTS: Thirteen cohorts including our nation-wide registry-based cohort and 1 case series comprising 553 patients with AIS (mean age: 75 years; male sex: 65%; median baseline NIH Stroke Scale score: 11 points) receiving idarucizumab before IVT were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled rate of sICH after IVT after idarucizumab administration was 4% (95% CI 1-9; I2 = 26%), while the pooled rates of any intracranial hemorrhage and 3-month mortality were 10% (95% CI 5-16; I2 = 24%) and 18% (95% CI 10-27; I2 = 0%), respectively. The pooled rates of excellent and good functional outcomes at 3 months were 56% (95% CI 27-83; I2 = 69%) and 70% (95% CI 57-81; I2 = 40%), respectively. The risk of sICH (risk ratio [RR] 1.86; 95% CI 0.91-3.80; I2 = 0%), any intracranial hemorrhage (RR 1.76; 95% CI 0.99-3.11; I2 = 8%), and 3-month mortality (RR 1.50; 95% CI 0.91-2.48; I2 = 0%) did not differ between patients with AIS receiving IVT with and without idarucizumab. Moreover, idarucizumab administration was associated with higher likelihood of achieving a 3-month good functional outcome (RR 1.35; 95% CI 1.11-1.65; I2 = 27%).
CONCLUSIONS: IVT for AIS after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab seems to be safe and effective in observational studies with limited number of patients. Randomized-controlled clinical trials are warranted to provide robust evidence on the safety and efficacy of IVT in this specific AIS subgroup.

Venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (venous thromboembolism) are important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In patients with venous thromboembolism, thrombi obstruct blood vessels and resist physiological dissolution (fibrinolysis), which can be life threatening and cause chronic complications. Plasminogen activator therapy, which was developed >50 years ago, is effective in dissolving thrombi but has unacceptable bleeding risks. Safe dissolution of thrombi in patients with venous thromboembolism has been elusive despite multiple innovations in plasminogen activator design and catheter-based therapy. Evidence now suggests that fibrinolysis is rigidly controlled by endogenous fibrinolysis inhibitors, including α2-antiplasmin, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and thrombin-activable fibrinolysis inhibitor. Elevated levels of these fibrinolysis inhibitors are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism in humans. New therapeutic paradigms suggest that accelerated and effective fibrinolysis may be achieved safely by therapeutically targeting these fibrinolytic inhibitors in venous thromboembolism. In this article, we discuss the role of fibrinolytic components in venous thromboembolism and the current status of research and development targeting fibrinolysis inhibitors.

Catheter-based interventions and surgical embolectomy represent alternatives to systemic fibrinolysis for patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) or those with intermediate-high-risk PE who deteriorate hemodynamically. They are indicated when systemic fibrinolysis is contraindicated or ineffective, or if obstructive shock is imminent. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be added to reperfusion therapies or used alone for severe right ventricular dysfunction and cardiogenic shock. These advanced therapies complement but do not replace anticoagulation, which remains the cornerstone in PE management. This review summarizes the evidence and shares practical recommendations for the use of anticoagulant therapy before, during, and after acute PE interventions.

BACKGROUND: The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a pivotal clinical tool used to assess patients with acute stroke. However, substantial heterogeneity in the application and interpretation of stroke scale items can occur. This systematic review aimed to elucidate heterogeneity in measuring the NIHSS.
METHODS: A literature search was performed on PubMed/OVID/Cochran\'s CENTRAL from inception to 2023. The references of the included papers were reviewed for further eligible articles. Clinical characteristic, NIHSS values, and sources of heterogeneity were recorded. Non-human and non-English language articles were excluded. The study quality was assessed using MINORS and GRADE. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed using a random-effects model to explore the sources of heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Twenty-one papers for a total of 818 patients (mean per study: 39 ± 37) and 9696 NIHSS examinations (median per study: 8 [CI95% 2 to 42]) were included. Motor function had a higher ICC agreement (ranging from 0.85 [\"Right Leg\"] to 0.90 [\"Right Arm\"]) compared to the remaining items (ranging from 0.58 [\"Facial Palsy\"] to 0.85 [\"Level of consciousness commands\"]. The meta-regression showed a low effect size of covariates such as language version, remote evaluation, and retrospective analysis on NIHSS items (e.g., for \"Level of consciousness commands,\" language effect was 0.30 [CI95% 0.20 to 0.48] and for \"Visual\", the retrospective assessment effect was -0.27 [CI95% -0.51 to -0.03]).
CONCLUSIONS: The NIHSS scores showed moderate to excellent inter-rater agreement, with the highest heterogeneity in non-motor function evaluation. Using a non-English version, remote evaluation and retrospective analysis had small effects in terms of heterogeneity in the NIHSS scores.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery thrombosis and myocardial ischemia caused by giant coronary aneurysms are the main causes of death in children with Kawasaki disease. The use of thrombolytic therapy in children with Kawasaki disease who have coronary thrombosis is a controversial topic, especially with respect to the timing of treatment.
METHODS: In this article, we report a case of a child aged two years and nine months with Kawasaki disease whose coronary arteries had no involvement in the acute phase. However, by only one week after discharge, the patient returned because we found giant coronary aneurysms complicated by thrombosis via echocardiography. Despite aggressive thrombolytic therapy, the child developed myocardial ischemia during thrombolytic therapy. Fortunately, because of timely treatment, the child\'s thrombus has dissolved, and the myocardial ischemia has resolved.
CONCLUSIONS: This case suggests that for patients at high risk of coronary artery aneurysms, echocardiography may need to be reviewed earlier. Low-molecular-weight heparin should be added to antagonize the early procoagulant effects of warfarin when warfarin therapy is initiated. In the case of first-detected coronary thrombosis, aggressive thrombolytic therapy may be justified, particularly during the acute and subacute phases of the disease course.

Whether the dynamic development of peripheral inflammation aggravates brain injury and leads to poor outcome in stroke patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), remains unclear and warrants further study. In this study, total of 1034 patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent IVT were enrolled. Serum leukocyte variation (whether increase from baseline to 24 h after IVT), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), infarct volume, early neurologic deterioration (END), the unfavorable outcome at 3-month (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score ≥3) and mortality were recorded. Serum brain injury biomarkers, including Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin c-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), S100β, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), were measured to reflect the extent of brain injury. We found that patients with increased serum leukocytes had elevated brain injury biomarkers (GFAP, UCH-L1, and S100β), larger infarct volume, higher 24 h NIHSS, higher proportion of END, unfavorable outcome and mortality. Furthermore, an increase in serum leukocytes was independently associated with infarct volume, 24 h NIHSS, END, and unfavorable outcome at 3 months, and serum UCH-L1, S100β, and NSE levels. These results suggest that an increase in serum leukocytes indicates severe brain injury and may be used to predict the outcome of patients with ischemic stroke who undergo IVT.

UNASSIGNED: Existing data suggested a rural-urban disparity in thrombolytic utilization for ischemic stroke. Here, we examined the use of guideline-recommended stroke care and outcomes in rural hospitals to identify targets for improvement.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective cohort study included patients (aged ≥18 years) treated for acute ischemic stroke at Get With The Guidelines-Stroke hospitals from 2017 to 2019. Multivariable mixed-effect logistic regression was used to compare thrombolysis rates, speed of treatment, secondary stroke prevention metrics, and outcomes after adjusting for patient- and hospital-level characteristics and stroke severity.
UNASSIGNED: Among the 1 127 607 patients admitted to Get With The Guidelines-Stroke hospitals in 2017 to 2019, 692 839 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients who presented within 4.5 hours were less likely to receive thrombolysis in rural stroke centers compared with urban stroke centers (31.7% versus 43.5%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.72 [95% CI, 0.68-0.76]) but exceeded rural nonstroke centers (22.1%; aOR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.15-1.37]). Rural stroke centers were less likely than urban stroke centers to achieve door-to-needle times of ≤45 minutes (33% versus 44.7%; aOR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.76-0.96]) but more likely than rural nonstroke centers (aOR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.04-1.49]). For secondary stroke prevention metrics, rural stroke centers were comparable to urban stroke centers but exceeded rural nonstroke centers (aOR of 1.66, 1.94, 2.44, 1.5, and 1.72, for antithrombotics within 48 hours of admission, antithrombotics at discharge, anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation/flutter, statin treatment, and smoking cessation, respectively). In-hospital mortality was similar between rural and urban stroke centers (aOR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.99-1.24]) or nonstroke centers (aOR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.84-1.18]).
UNASSIGNED: Rural hospitals had lower thrombolysis utilization and slower treatment times than urban hospitals. Rural stroke centers provided comparable secondary stroke prevention treatment to urban stroke centers and exceeded rural nonstroke centers. These results reveal important opportunities and specific targets for rural health equity interventions.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis is a standard treatment of acute ischemic stroke. The efficacy and safety of combining intravenous thrombolysis with argatroban (an anticoagulant agent) or eptifibatide (an antiplatelet agent) are unclear.
METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, three-group, adaptive, single-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial at 57 sites in the United States. Patients with acute ischemic stroke who had received intravenous thrombolysis within 3 hours after symptom onset were assigned to receive intravenous argatroban, eptifibatide, or placebo within 75 minutes after the initiation of thrombolysis. The primary efficacy outcome, the utility-weighted 90-day modified Rankin scale score (range, 0 to 10, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes), was assessed by means of centralized adjudication. The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours after randomization.
RESULTS: A total of 514 patients were assigned to receive argatroban (59 patients), eptifibatide (227 patients), or placebo (228 patients). All the patients received intravenous thrombolysis (70% received alteplase, and 30% received tenecteplase), and 225 patients (44%) underwent endovascular thrombectomy. At 90 days, the mean (±SD) utility-weighted modified Rankin scale scores were 5.2±3.7 with argatroban, 6.3±3.2 with eptifibatide, and 6.8±3.0 with placebo. The posterior probability that argatroban was better than placebo was 0.002 (posterior mean difference in utility-weighted modified Rankin scale score, -1.51±0.51) and that eptifibatide was better than placebo was 0.041 (posterior mean difference, -0.50±0.29). The incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was similar in the three groups (4% with argatroban, 3% with eptifibatide, and 2% with placebo). Mortality at 90 days was higher in the argatroban group (24%) and the eptifibatide group (12%) than in the placebo group (8%).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis within 3 hours after symptom onset, adjunctive treatment with intravenous argatroban or eptifibatide did not reduce poststroke disability and was associated with increased mortality. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; MOST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03735979.).

We have thoroughly engaged with the article titled \"Epidemiological profile of stroke in Qatar: Insights from a seven-year observational study\". The author\'s diligent efforts regarding this critical subject matter are greatly appreciated [1], which is worthy of reader acknowledgment. We sincerely appreciate the author\'s ongoing efforts on this vital subject, which deserve recognition. The primary conclusion of the article is that the incidence of stroke is increasing. However, it remains relatively low compared to the rising trend observed in Western countries. We agree with this assessment. It highlights the multi-ethnic population and unique risk factors of the Qatari and expatriate populations that are associated with stroke. The necessity of investing in designated stroke care strategies and balanced care for all population groups is underscored by the improved emergency medical services and healthcare access that have contributed to improving stroke care. Based on this, there are a few additional elements that could have contributed to the article\'s conclusion.

UNASSIGNED: Stroke treatment is exquisitely time sensitive. The door-in-door-out (DIDO) time, defined as the total time spent in the emergency department (ED) at a transferring hospital, is an important quality metric for the care of acute stroke. However, little is known about the contributions of specific process steps to delays and disparities in DIDO time.
UNASSIGNED: To quantify process steps and their association with DIDO times at transferring hospitals among patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients in the American Heart Association Get With the Guidelines-Stroke registry with AIS presenting between January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021, and transferred from the presenting hospital ED to another acute care hospital for evaluation of thrombolytics, endovascular therapy, or postthrombolytic care. Data were analyzed from July 8 to October 13, 2023.
UNASSIGNED: Intervals of ED care of ischemic stroke: door-to-imaging and imaging-to-door times.
UNASSIGNED: The primary outcome was DIDO time. Multivariate generalized estimating equations regression models were performed to compare contributions of interval process times to explain variation in DIDO time, controlling for patient- and hospital-level characteristics.
UNASSIGNED: Among 28 887 patients (50.5% male; mean [SD] age, 68.3 [14.8] years; 5.5% Hispanic, 14.7% non-Hispanic Black, and 73.2% non-Hispanic White), mean (SD) DIDO time was 171.4 (149.5) minutes, mean (SD) door-to-imaging time was 18.3 (34.1) minutes, and mean (SD) imaging-to-door time was 153.1 (141.5) minutes. In the model adjusting for door-to-imaging time, the following were associated with longer DIDO time: age 80 years or older (compared with 18-59 years; 5.97 [95% CI, 1.02-10.92] minutes), female sex (5.21 [95% CI, 1.55-8.87] minutes), and non-Hispanic Black race (compared with non-Hispanic White 10.09 [95% CI, 4.21-15.96] minutes). In the model including imaging-to-door time as a covariate, disparities in DIDO by age and female sex became nonsignificant, and the disparity by Black race was attenuated (2.32 [95% CI, 1.09-3.56] minutes).
UNASSIGNED: In this national cohort study of interhospital transfer of patients with AIS, delays in DIDO time by Black race, older age (≥80 years), and female sex were largely explained by the imaging-to-door period, suggesting that future systems interventions should target this interval to reduce these disparities. While existing guidelines and care resources heavily focus on reducing door-to-imaging times, further attention is warranted to reduce imaging-to-door times in the management of patients with AIS who require interhospital transfer.