OBJECTIVE: To close the atrial septal defect (ASD) with the transcatheter method, correctly defining the defect and selecting the appropriate closure device size are the most critical steps for the procedure\'s success. Although ASD can be successfully closed under the guidance of three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and two-dimensional (2D) TEE, measurement comparisons between different types of defects are still needed.
METHODS: Our study was designed retrospectively. Sixty-one patients who underwent transcatheter ASD closure with 2D TEE and 3D TEE between 2020 and 2024 were included. The patients were divided into three groups according to the defect shape: circular, oval, and complex; and the measurement results, perioperative process, and clinical outcomes were compared in each group.
RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 35.05 ± 13.87 years, and 41 (67.2%) were women. The average follow-up period of the patients was 15.3 ± 9.18 months. No statistical significance was observed in the comparison of measurements obtained with 3D TEE and 2D TEE in the circular and oval defect groups. The differences between the minimum defect diameters of complex defects measured by 2D TEE and 3D TEE (p: 0.037), IVC rims (p < 0.001), aortic rims (p: 0.012), and the differences between implanted device dimensions and the maximum defect diameters measured by both methods were compared; statistical significance was observed (p: 0.025).
CONCLUSIONS: In circular and non-complex oval defects, it has been observed that the size of the closure device selected with 2D TEE or 3D TEE is optimal, and the procedure is practical and feasible. While the closure of complex ASDs with 3D TEE provides reliable and optimal results, using only 2D TEE in complex ASDs may lead to selecting a smaller-sized device.

BACKGROUND: The impact of various imaging modalities on discordance/concordance between indexed aortic valve area (iAVA) and catheterization-derived mean transaortic pressure gradient (mPGcath) is unclear in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). This study aimed to compare iAVA measurements obtained using four different methodologies in BAV and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients, using mPGcath as a reference standard.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent comprehensive assessment of AS, including two-dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), and catheterization, at our institution between 2019 and 2022. iAVA was measured using the continuity eq. (CE) with left ventricular outflow tract area obtained by 2D TTE, 3D TEE, and MDCT, as well as planimetric 3D TEE.
CONCLUSIONS: Among 564 patients (64 with BAV and 500 with TAV), 64 propensity-matched pairs of patients with BAV and TAV were analyzed. iAVACE(2DTTE) led to overestimation of AS severity (BAV, 23.4%; TAV, 28.1%) and iAVACE(MDCT) led to underestimation of AS severity (BAV, 29.3%; TAV, 16.7%), whereas iAVACE(3DTEE) and iAVAPlani(3DTEE) resulted in a reduction in the discordance of AS grading. A moderate correlation was observed between mPGcath and iAVACE(3DTEE) (BAV, r = -0.63; TAV, r = -0.68), with iAVACE(3DTEE) corresponding to the current guidelines\' cutoff value (BAV, 0.58 cm2/m2; TAV, 0.60 cm2/m2). Discordance/concordance between iAVA and mPGcath in evaluating AS severity varies depending on the methodology and imaging modality used. The use of iAVACE(3DTEE) is valuable for reconciling the discordant AS grading in BAV patients as well as TAV.

Infective endocarditis (IE) diagnosis is based on a clinical suspicion supported by consistent microbiological and instrumental data. Evidence of involvement of cardiac valves (native or prosthetic) or prosthetic intracardiac material is a major diagnostic criterion of IE. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the initial technique of choice for the diagnosis while transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is recommended in patients with an inconclusive or negative TTE, in patients with high suspicion of IE, as well as in patients with a positive TTE, in order to document local complications. Repeating TTE and/or TEE should be considered during follow-up of uncomplicated IE, in order to detect new silent complications and monitor vegetation size. In the setting of IE, the role of three-dimensional (3D) TEE is increasing; in fact, this technique has also been shown to be useful for the diagnosis of IE and its complications as it allows to obtain infinite planes and volumetric reconstructions. In this review, we will describe the usefulness of 3D-TEE and its added value in the management of IE.

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of flow status is crucial in low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS). However, the clinical implication of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3DTEE) on flow status evaluation remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the assessment of flow status using 3D TEE in low-gradient AS patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with low-gradient AS and preserved ejection fraction at our institution between 2019 and 2022. Patients were categorized into low-flow/low-gradient (LF-LG) AS or normal-flow/low-gradient (NF-LG) AS based on two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2DTTE). We compared the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) geometry between the two groups and reclassified them using stroke volume index (SVi) obtained by 3DTEE.
RESULTS: Among 173 patients (105 with LF-LG AS and 68 with NF-LG AS), 54 propensity-matched pairs of patients were analyzed. 3DTEE-derived ellipticity index of LVOT was significantly higher in LF-LG AS patients compared to NF-LG AS patients (p = 0.012). We assessed the discordance in flow status classification between SVi2DTTE and SVi3DTEE in both groups using a cutoff value of 35 ml/m2. The LF-LG AS group exhibited a significantly higher discordance rate compared to the NF-LG AS group, with rates of 50% and 2%, respectively. The optimal cutoff values of SVi3DTEE for identifying low flow status, based on 2DTTE-derived cutoff values, were determined to be 43 ml/m2.
CONCLUSIONS: LVOT ellipticity in low-gradient AS patients varies depending on flow status, and this difference contributes to discrepancies between SVi3DTEE and SVi2DTTE, particularly in LF-LG AS patients. Utilizing SVi3DTEE is valuable for accurately assessing flow status.

Interest in transcatheter treatment of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has grown significantly in recent years due to increasing evidence correlating TR severity with mortality and to limited availability of surgical options often considered high-risk in these patients. Although edge-to-edge repair is currently the main transcatheter therapeutic strategy, tricuspid valve direct annuloplasty can also be performed safely and effectively to reduce TR and improve heart failure symptoms and quality of life. In the annuloplasty procedure, an adjustable band is implanted around the tricuspid annulus to reduce valvular size and improve TR. Patient selection and careful preoperative imaging, including transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, and computed tomography, are critical for procedural success and proper device implantation. Compared to edge-to-edge repair, perioperative imaging with transesophageal echocardiography and fluoroscopy is particularly challenging. Alignment and insertion of the anchors are demanding but essential to achieve good results and avoid damaging the surrounding structures. The presence of shadowing artifacts due to cardiac devices makes the acquisition of good-quality images even more challenging. In this review, we discuss the current role of multimodality imaging in planning direct transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty and describe all procedural steps focusing on echocardiographic monitoring.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: A direct comparison of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3DTEE) and cardiac computed tomography imaging has demonstrated good inter-technique agreement for the following pulmonary vein (PV) parameters: the ostium area of the right superior PV (RSPV) and its major (a) and minor axis (b) diameters, the left lateral ridge and the minor axis (b) diameter of the left superior PV. Herein, under investigation, was the predictive value of these parameters for arrhythmia recurrence (AR) after PV isolation with the 28 mm second generation cryoballoon (CBG2).
METHODS: One hundred eleven patients (67 men, mean age 58.06 ± 10.58 years) undergoing 3DTEE before PV isolation with the CBG2 for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were followed. \"Point by point\" redo intervention was offered in case of AR and reconnected PVs were defined.
RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 617 ± 258.86 days, 65 (58.9%) patients remained free of AR. Longer RSPV b was found to be the only significant predictor for AR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.059; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.000-1.121; p = 0.048). RSPV b ≥ 28 mm resulted in a threefold (HR 3.010; 95% CI 1.270-7.134, p = 0.012) increase in the risk of AR. The association of RSPV b with AR was independent of the biophysical parameters of cryoapplications. In 25 \"redo\" patients, reconnections were found 1.75 times more likely in the RSPV than in the other 3 PVs altogether.
CONCLUSIONS: Right superior PV b measured with 3DTEE might be a significant predictor of AR after PV isolation with the CBG2. In case of RSPV b exceeding 28 mm, alternative PV isolation techniques or use of a larger balloon might be considered.

BACKGROUND: In left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN FLX, accurate device measurement by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is important. We aimed to experimentally validate appropriate methods of device measurement with two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) TEE compared with actual size.
METHODS: We prepared a full range of device sizes (20, 24, 27, 31, 35 mm), each with five different compression rates. Each device was measured by 2D and 3D TEE at depths of 2, 4, and 6 cm in vitro using inner, outer, and middle line methods. We compared the difference between the actual size by caliper and measurements at each compression rate and depth by the three methods in 2D and 3D TEE.
RESULTS: A total of 450 patterns of measurements were analyzed. The differences using the middle line method were much less than those using the inner and outer line methods in 2D and 3D TEE (2D TEE: 0.45 ± 0.36 vs. 2.55 ± 0.99 vs. 2.59 ± 0.72 mm, p < 0.01; 3D TEE: 0.34 ± 0.27 vs. 2.38 ± 0.69 vs. 1.86 ± 0.77 mm, p < 0.01). Moreover, the differences in measurements by 3D TEE were more accurate than those of 2D TEE in the inner (2.47 ± 1.86 vs. 1.86 ± 0.77 mm, p < 0.01) and middle (0.58 ± 0.37 vs. 0.34 ± 0.27 mm, p < 0.01) line methods.
CONCLUSIONS: Middle line method by 3D TEE is the most reliable approach for device measurement at left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN FLX device.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Transventricular beating-heart mitral valve repair (TBMVR) with artificial chordae implantation is a technique to treat mitral valve prolapse. Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography completed with simultaneous biplane view during surgeon finger pushing on the left ventricular (LV) wall (finger test [FT]) is currently used to localize the desired LV access, on the inferior-lateral wall, between the papillary muscles (PMs). We aimed to compare a new three-dimensional (3D) method with conventional FT in terms of safety and better localization of LV access.
UNASSIGNED: During TBMVR, conventional FT was completed using 3D transesophageal echocardiography by placing the sample box in the bicommissural view of the LV, including the PMs and the apex. The 3D volume was subsequently edited to visualize the LV from above (surgical view) to localize the bulge of the operator\'s finger pushing on the LV. We asked the first operator, the second operator, and the cardiac surgery fellow, separately, to evaluate the location of their finger pushing, both with the 2D method and the 3D method, to estimate the interoperator concordance.
UNASSIGNED: From 2019 to 2021, 42 TBMVRs were performed without complications related to access using FT completed with the 3D method. Regarding the choice of the right and safe entry site, the operator\'s agreement was higher using 3D rendering compared with conventional FT (mean agreement 0.59 ± 0.29 for 2D vs 0.83 ± 0.20 for 3D), while full operator agreement was 10 of 42 for 2D and 23 of 42 for 3D (P = 0.004).
UNASSIGNED: Three-dimensional FT is easy to perform and facilitates surgeons choosing the best access for TBMVR in term of anatomical localization and safety.