Researchers have been focusing on perceptual characteristics of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in terms of sensory hyperreactivity. Previously, we demonstrated that temporal resolution, which is the accuracy to differentiate the order of two successive vibrotactile stimuli, is associated with the severity of sensory hyperreactivity. We currently examined whether an increase in the perceptual intensity of a tactile stimulus, despite its short duration, is derived from high temporal resolution and high frequency of sensory temporal summation. Twenty ASD and 22 typically developing (TD) participants conducted two psychophysical experimental tasks to evaluate detectable duration of vibrotactile stimulus with same amplitude and to evaluate temporal resolution. The sensory hyperreactivity was estimated using self-reported questionnaire. There was no relationship between the temporal resolution and the duration of detectable stimuli in both groups. However, the ASD group showed severe sensory hyperreactivity in daily life than TD group, and the ASD participants with severe sensory hyperreactivity tended to have high temporal resolution, not high sensitivity of detectable duration. Contrary to the hypothesis, there might be different processing between temporal resolution and sensitivity for stimulus detection. We suggested that the atypical temporal processing would affect to sensory reactivity in ASD.

Central sensitization (CS) involves an amplification of neural processing within the central nervous system that can result in widespread pain patterns and hypersensitivity to stimuli. The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) and various quantitative sensory testing (QST) methods purport to assess clinical markers of CS. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize and quantify the associations between total CSI scores and QST measures from previous studies. A systematic search identified 39 unique studies that were deemed eligible for the systematic review and 33 studies for meta-analyses (with 3314 subjects and 154 effect sizes), including five QST modalities: conditioned pain modulation, temporal summation, pressure pain threshold, heat pain threshold, and cold pain threshold. The meta-analysis yielded statistically significant CSI-QST correlations in total subject samples for all five QST modalities. The strongest associations were identified between CSI scores and pain threshold testing, especially pressure pain threshold, in which 51% of effects sizes, from 29 studies and 3071 subjects, were determined to be in a medium to large range.

Cluster Headache (CH) is a primary headache that causes severe pain. Some evidence suggests that central mechanisms might be involved. The objective of this study was (1) to compare hyperalgesia signs, temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation among episodic (ECH) and chronic CH (CCH) patients and controls, (2) to compare these factors between sides in the patient groups and (3) to compare the psychophysical variables between the groups. This cross-sectional study included 71 subjects divided into three groups (ECH, CCH and controls). Pressure pain thresholds, temporal summation, conditioned pain modulation and other psychosocial variables were measured. The ANOVA showed differences for all physical outcome measures (p < 0.05). Bonferroni post hoc analyses showed differences when comparing the patient groups with the healthy subjects (p < 0.05), with large effect sizes (d > 0.8). No differences between the patient groups were found for almost all the variables (p > 0.05). Significant differences for all the variables were detected when comparing the symptomatic and non-symptomatic sides in both the ECH and CCH groups (p < 0.05). The ECH and CCH groups showed mechanical hyperalgesia, increased temporal summation and impaired inhibitory mechanisms compared to the controls. Side-to-side differences were also detected within the patient groups. Patients with CCH had poorer sleep quality and quality of life than the controls.

UNASSIGNED: Temporal summation (TS) of pain occurs when pain increases over repeated presentations of identical noxious stimuli. TS paradigms can model central sensitization, a state of hyperexcitability in nociceptive pathways that promotes chronic pain onset and maintenance. Many experimenters use painful heat stimuli to measure TS (TS-heat); yet, TS-heat research faces unresolved challenges, including difficulty evoking summation in up to 30-50% of participants. Moreover, substantial variability exists between laboratories regarding the methods for evoking and calculating TS-heat.
UNASSIGNED: To address these limitations, this study sought to identify optimal parameters for evoking TS-heat in healthy participants with a commercially available constant contact heat stimulator, the Medoc TSA-II. Working within constraints of the TSA-II, stimulus trains with varying parameters (eg, stimulus frequency, baseline temp, peak temp, peak duration, testing site) were tested in a sample of 32 healthy, chronic pain-free participants to determine which combination best evoked TS-heat. To determine whether TS scoring method altered results, TS-heat was scored using three common methods.
UNASSIGNED: Across all methods, only two trains successfully evoked group-level TS-heat. These trains shared the following parameters: site (palmar hand), baseline and peak temperatures (44°C and 50°C, respectively), and peak duration (0.5 s). Both produced summation that peaked at moderate pain (~50 out of 100 rating).
UNASSIGNED: Future TS-heat investigations using constant contact thermodes and fixed protocols may benefit from adopting stimulus parameters that include testing on the palmar hand, using 44°C baseline and 50°C peak temperatures, at ≥0.33 Hz stimulus frequency, and peak pulse durations of at least 0.5 seconds.

BACKGROUND: Population voltage imaging is used for studying brain physiology and brain circuits. Using a genetically encoded voltage indicator (GEVI), \"VSFP\" or \"ASAP2s\", or a voltage-sensitive dye, Di-4-Anepps, we conducted population voltage imaging in brain slices. The resulting optical signals, optical local field potentials (LFPs), were used to evaluate the performances of the 3 voltage indicators.
METHODS: In brain slices prepared from VSFP-transgenic or ASAP2s-transgenic mice, we performed multi-site optical imaging of evoked cortical depolarizations - compound excitatory postsynaptic potentials (cEPSPs). Optical signal amplitudes (ΔF/F) and cEPSP decay rates (OFF rates) were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by unpaired Student\'s t test (31-104 data points per voltage indicator).
RESULTS: The ASAP2s signal amplitude (ΔF/F) was on average 3 times greater than Di-4-Anepps, and 7 times greater than VSFP. The optical cEPSP decay (OFF rate) was the slowest in Di-4-Anepps and fastest in ASAP2s. When ASAP2s expression was weak, we observed slow, label-free (autofluorescence, metabolic) optical signals mixed into the ASAP2s traces. Fast hyperpolarizations, that typically follow depolarizing cortical transients (afterhyperpolarizations), were prominent in ASAP2s but not present in the VSFP and Di-4-Anepps experiments.
CONCLUSIONS: Experimental applications for ASAP2s may potentially include systems neuroscience studies that require voltage indicators with large signal amplitude (ΔF/F), fast decay times (fast response time is needed for monitoring high frequency brain oscillations), and/or detection of brain patches in transiently hyperpolarized states (afterhyperpolarization).

What physiological role does a slow hyperpolarization-activated ion channel with mixed cation selectivity play in the fast world of neuronal action potentials that are driven by depolarization? That puzzling question has piqued the curiosity of physiology enthusiasts about the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels, which are widely expressed across the body and especially in neurons. In this review, we emphasize the need to assess HCN channels from the perspective of how they respond to time-varying signals, while also accounting for their interactions with other co-expressing channels and receptors. First, we illustrate how the unique structural and functional characteristics of HCN channels allow them to mediate a slow negative feedback loop in the neurons that they express in. We present the several physiological implications of this negative feedback loop to neuronal response characteristics including neuronal gain, voltage sag and rebound, temporal summation, membrane potential resonance, inductive phase lead, spike triggered average, and coincidence detection. Next, we argue that the overall impact of HCN channels on neuronal physiology critically relies on their interactions with other co-expressing channels and receptors. Interactions with other channels allow HCN channels to mediate intrinsic oscillations, earning them the \"pacemaker channel\" moniker, and to regulate spike frequency adaptation, plateau potentials, neurotransmitter release from presynaptic terminals, and spike initiation at the axonal initial segment. We also explore the impact of spatially non-homogeneous subcellular distributions of HCN channels in different neuronal subtypes and their interactions with other channels and receptors. Finally, we discuss how plasticity in HCN channels is widely prevalent and can mediate different encoding, homeostatic, and neuroprotective functions in a neuron. In summary, we argue that HCN channels form an important class of channels that mediate a diversity of neuronal functions owing to their unique gating kinetics that made them a puzzle in the first place.

UNASSIGNED: In chronic pain conditions such as fibromyalgia (FM), pain amplification within the central nervous system, or \"central sensitization,\" may contribute to the development and maintenance of chronic pain. Chronic pain treatments include opioid therapy, and opioid therapy may maladaptively increase central sensitization, particularly in patients who take opioids long-term. However, it has remained unknown how central sensitization is impacted in patients who use opioids long-term.
UNASSIGNED: To investigate how long-term opioid therapy affects central sensitization, we used the validated measure of temporal summation. The temporal summation measurement consists of applying a series of noxious stimuli to a patient\'s skin and then calculating changes in the patient\'s pain rating to each stimulus. Using this measurement, we evaluated temporal summation in study participants with fibromyalgia who take opioids long-term (i.e., greater than 90 days duration; n = 24, opioid-FM). We compared opioid-FM responses to 2 control groups: participants with fibromyalgia who do not take opioids (n = 33, non-opioid FM), and healthy controls (n = 31). For the temporal summation measurement, we applied a series of 10 noxious heat stimuli (sensitivity-adjusted temperatures) to the ventral forearm (2s duration of each stimulus, applied once every 3 s). Additionally, we collected responses to standard pain and cognitive-affective questionnaires to assess pain severity and other factors.
UNASSIGNED: Group differences in sensitivity-adjusted stimulus temperatures were observed, with only the non-opioid FM group requiring significantly lower stimulus temperatures (The opioid-FM group also required lower temperatures, but not significantly different from the control group). However, all 3 groups exhibited similar magnitudes of temporal summation. Across combined FM groups, temporal summation negatively correlated with pain severity (r = -0.31, p = 0.021). Within the opioid-FM group, higher pain sensitivity to heat (i.e., lower sensitivity-adjusted temperatures) showed a trend relationship with higher opioid dosage (r = -0.45, p = 0.036), potentially reflective of opioid-related hyperalgesia. Our findings also indicated that heightened pain severity may skew sensitivity-adjusted temporal summation, thereby limiting its utility for measuring central sensitization. Overall, in participants taking opioids, temporal summation may be influenced by hypersensitivity to heat pain, which appeared to vary with opioid dosage.

People with knee osteoarthritis walk with excessive muscle co-contraction that can accelerate disease progression. Central pain sensitization is common in people with knee osteoarthritis and may be related to walking patterns. The objective of this study was to examine the relation of central pain sensitization with muscle co-contraction during walking in people with knee osteoarthritis.
This study reports secondary analysis from baseline data of two clinical trials (n = 90 participants with knee osteoarthritis). The presence of central pain sensitization was measured by mechanical temporal summation at the patella and the wrist. Quadriceps and hamstrings activation was assessed using surface electromyography during walking at self-selected and fast paces. Muscle co-contraction indices for vastus medialis-medial hamstrings and vastus lateralis-lateral hamstrings muscle pairs were calculated during stance phases. Co-contraction outcomes were compared between people with and without mechanical temporal summation at each site, adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index.
People with mechanical temporal summation at the knee had greater vastus lateralis-lateral hamstrings co-contraction while walking at a fast pace (P = 0.04). None of the other differences was statistically significant, but the overall trends and effect sizes indicated greater co-contraction in people with temporal summation at the knee irrespective of gait phase, walking speed, or muscle pairs.
Central pain sensitization, assessed as mechanical temporal summation at the knee, is related to greater knee muscle co-contraction during fast walking in people with knee osteoarthritis. Thus, mitigating central sensitization may be an interventional target to reduce muscle co-contraction for people with knee osteoarthritis.

Reading involves many different abilities that are necessary or sufficient conditions for fluent and flawless reading. The absence of one necessary or of all sufficient conditions is a cause of dyslexia. The present study investigates whether too short fixation times and an impaired ability to recognize a string of letters simultaneously are causes of dyslexia. The frequency and types of reading mistakes were investigated in a tachistoscopic pseudoword experiment with 100 children with dyslexia to test the impact of too short fixation times and the attempts of children with dyslexia to recognize more letters simultaneously than they can when reading pseudowords. The experiment demonstrates that all types of reading mistakes disappear when the fixation time increases and/or the number of letters that the children try to recognize simultaneously is reduced. The results cannot be interpreted as being due to altered visual crowding, impaired attention, or impaired phonological awareness, but can be regarded as an effect of impaired temporal summation and a dysfunction in the ventral stream of the visual system.

UNASSIGNED: Topical application of capsaicin can produce an ongoing pain state in healthy participants. However, approximately one-third report no pain response (ie, nonresponders), and the reasons for this are poorly understood.
UNASSIGNED: In this study, we investigated temporal summation of pain (TSP) profiles, pain ratings and secondary hyperalgesia responses in responders and nonresponders to 1% topical capsaicin cream.
UNASSIGNED: Assessments were made at baseline and then during an early (ie, 15 minutes) and late (ie, 45 minutes) time points post-capsaicin in 37 healthy participants.
UNASSIGNED: Participants reporting a visual analogue scale (VAS) rating of >50 were defined as responders (n = 24) and those with <50 VAS rating were defined as nonresponders (n = 13). There was a facilitation of TSP during the transition from an early to the late time point post-capsaicin (P<0.001) and the development of secondary hyperalgesia (P<0.05) in the responder group. Nonresponders showed no changes in TSP or secondary hyperalgesia during the early and late time points. There was an association between baseline TSP scores and the later development of a responder or nonresponder phenotype (r = 0.36; P = 0.03). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that baseline TSP works as a good response predictor at an individual level (area under the curve = 0.75).
UNASSIGNED: These data suggest that responders and nonresponders have different facilitatory pain mechanisms. The assessment of TSP may help to identify participants with stronger endogenous pain facilitation who may be more likely to respond to topical capsaicin.