Histopathological findings associated with definite vasculitis in temporal artery biopsy (TAB) defined in 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) was published in 2022. We aimed to evaluate the TAB of our GCA patients for histopathological findings associated with definite vasculitis. Patients who were diagnosed with GCA by clinicians and underwent TAB between January 2012 and May 2022 were included. Hospital electronic records and patients\' files were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 90 patients\' pathology reports were evaluated by a pathologist and a rheumatologist. In cases where microscopic findings were not specified in the pathology reports, histopathologic specimens were re-evaluated (n = 36). A standard checklist was used for histopathological findings of definite vasculitis. Patients were divided into two groups; (i) definite vasculitis-GCA and (ii) non-definite-GCA group, and the clinical and demographic characteristics for all patients were compared. The mean age of patients was 69.8 (± 8.5) years and 52.2% were female. In the first evaluation, 66 (73.3%) patients had a diagnosis of vasculitis according to pathology reports. In the re-evaluation of biopsy specimens, at least one definite finding of vasculitis was observed in TAB of 10/24 (41.6%) patients whose microscopic findings were not specified in the pathology reports. The ROC analysis showed that biopsy length had diagnostic value in predicting the diagnosis of definite vasculitis (AUC: 0.778, 95% CI: 0.65-0.89, p < 0.001). In those with a biopsy length of ≥ 1 cm, sensitivity was 76.5%, specificity was 64.3%, and PPV value was 92. In multivariate analysis, the most significant factor associated with definite vasculitis was biopsy length (OR: 1.18 (1.06-1.31), p = 0.002). Microscopic findings were reported in over 70% of patients. Reinterpretation of results according to a standard check-list improved the impact of TAB in the diagnosis of GCA. A biopsy length ≥ 1 cm was found to contribute towards a definitive histopathological vasculitis diagnosis.

Background Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is the recommended index diagnostic method for giant cell arteritis (GCA). Per the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) guidelines, we assessed our procedural performance. Additionally, we evaluated the occurrence of GCA diagnosis in immunosuppressed patients and other comorbidities. Methods Following the audit registration, a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted from 2017 to 2022 at a large university hospital in North Midlands, England. Data on demographics and comorbidities were gathered. The study\'s primary outcome was adherence to BSR guidelines and our service provisions. Secondary outcomes included examining the relationship between biopsy-confirmed GCA and other comorbidities. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 29 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, United States of America). Two-sample t-test and Chi-square/Fisher exact test were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Holm-Bonferroni method was incorporated to adjust for multiple comparisons. Results A total of 156 patients who underwent temporal artery biopsy (TAB) were included in the study, with a male-to-female ratio of 0.44:1. The median age was 73. Among the patients, 19% were smokers. The procedures were performed by either a vascular surgeon (119, 76%) or by an ophthalmologist (37, 24%). Two-thirds of the patients underwent TAB within seven days of referral. In 73, 47% of cases, the post-fixation biopsy sample size exceeded 10 mm. Positive biopsy results were found in 45 patients (29%). GCA was confirmed in 39% of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), 24% with diabetics, 20% with hypothyroidism, 29% with hypertension, 32% with hyperlipidaemia, and 26% with other inflammatory diseases. However, the p-value was below the statistically significant threshold. The biopsy outcome was also not dependent on the speciality, time from referral to biopsy, nor on the length of the post-fixation specimen. Conclusions Temporal artery biopsy remains a valuable and crucial diagnostic tool in challenging equivocal cases of giant cell arteritis (GCA), although it is limited by its sensitivity, but there is also room for improvement. There is still uncertainty regarding the relationship between biopsy positivity, post-fixation sample size, and the interval between referral and procedure. Additionally, the speciality of the clinician performing the biopsy does not appear to significantly influence the likelihood of a positive result. We still do not fully understand why this is, but the association of the GCA with other comorbidities was unpredictably insignificant.

Giant cell arteritis is a form of large vessel vasculitis which can present with nonspecific symptoms, and if left untreated can cause significant morbidity and/or death. Early diagnosis and management are therefore paramount. The use of [18F]FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of giant cell arteritis has increased in recent years, with newer generation PET scanners capturing the historically elusive cranial vessel inflammation in active vasculitis. We present a case of giant cell arteritis which was suspected on conventional imaging modalities, and subsequently evaluated with [18F]FDG PET/CT which revealed marked vascular inflammation involving both cranial and other large vessels.

UNASSIGNED: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a systemic granulomatous vasculitis affecting the medium and large-size arteries, and may present with a range of ophthalmic findings. This review will cover GCA epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, and treatment.
UNASSIGNED: GCA is commonly found in elderly patients and individuals of Scandinavian descent. Recent publications suggest it may be more common in African Americans and Hispanics than previously thought. It is very rare in Asian and Middle-Eastern populations, and there is little data regarding African populations. Genetic studies have identified increased risk associated with HLA-DRB1*04. Rather than a response to a specific antigen such as varicella zoster virus, current immunology research suggests that GCA results from changes associated with the aging immune system.
UNASSIGNED: Arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy is the most common ophthalmic manifestation of GCA, but central or branch retinal artery occlusion, ophthalmic artery occlusion, cranial neuropathies causing diplopia, and more rarely anterior segment ischemia and anisocoria may also occur. Clinical testing including visual field testing, OCT, OCT-A, ICG and fluorescein angiography can be helpful in suggesting a diagnosis in addition to the clinical exam.
UNASSIGNED: GCA is ultimately a clinical diagnosis, but it is usually supported with lab results, pathology, and/or imaging. Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) remains the gold standard diagnostic test although its sensitivity is debated and practice patterns still vary with respect to sample length and whether unilateral or simultaneous bilateral biopsies are performed. Some studies have reported higher sensitivity of ultrasounds over TAB, with added benefits of time efficiency and cost effectiveness, promoting the diagnostic use of ultrasounds. MRI and even PET CT protocols offer additional options for less invasive diagnostic testing.
UNASSIGNED: Vision-threatening GCA is treated acutely with emergent admission for intravenous methylprednisolone, and long-term high dose oral corticosteroids remain the standard of care, despite common and sometimes serious side effects. The use of steroid-sparing alternatives such as tocilizumab is becoming more common and additional agents are being investigated.

UNASSIGNED: Temporal artery (TA) biopsy is commonly used for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA). However, a positive biopsy is no longer mandatory for diagnosis. This study aims to correlate the histopathological findings of TA biopsies in suspected cases of GCA to the clinical presentation in an ophthalmic tertiary eye care center to draw useful conclusions and advocate the possible implementation of guidelines for TA biopsy.
UNASSIGNED: Data was collected from patients\' medical records including, demographics, clinical data, and histopathological findings and diagnosis. The 2022 American College of Rheumatology/ European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) criteria have been used and partially adopted as a guide to compare the variables between TA biopsy-positive and negative groups as well as the TA biopsy-positive group and the group of patients with TA biopsy showing atherosclerosis.
UNASSIGNED: Out of the total 35 patients who underwent a TA biopsy during the period of 23 years, 22.9% of patients had histopathological findings consistent with GCA and 42.9% had TA atherosclerotic changes, while the remaining 34.3% had histologically unremarkable TA. The mean age of all patients was 66 ± 10.9 years. Slightly more than half were females (54.3%) and the remaining were males (45.7%). In the group with positive TA biopsies, the mean age was 71 ± 8.4 years with a higher female predominance (female-to-male ratio of 5:3). The mean diagnostic clinical score used in our study was higher (7.5 ± 2.33) in the GCA-positive group when compared to the other groups with statistical significance (mean of 4.85 ± 2.01 in patients with overall GCA-negative biopsies and 5.13 ± 2.10 in the group with atherosclerosis). Other three clinical variables that were found to be statistically significant in the GCA biopsy-positive group were scalp tenderness, jaw claudication, and optic nerve pallor.
UNASSIGNED: The mean age (71 ± 8.4 years) and the female predominance of GCA in our group of patients with positive TA biopsy (62.5%) was like other reports. In our study 22.9% of performed TA biopsies over the period of the study were positive confirming the diagnosis of GCA on histological exam, which was similar to another report and is considered to be relatively low. The incorporation of increased clinically focused assessments and algorithms, with the aid of the ACR/EULAR criteria, may decrease the frequency of TA biopsies that carries unnecessary cost and risk of procedure-related morbidity. We highly recommend applying the age of ≥ 50 years as an initial criterion for diagnosis, followed by the consideration of the statistically significant clinical features: scalp tenderness, jaw claudication, and optic nerve pallor.

This case report describes a complicated case of giant cell arteritis (GCA) with tongue necrosis and bilateral central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO). An 81-year-old male patient with a history of recent retinal artery occlusion, ischemic stroke, and hypertensive emergency was evaluated. Clinical examination, including a visual acuity assessment, fundus evaluation, and oral examination, was performed. Laboratory investigations, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), were conducted. A temporal artery biopsy was performed to confirm the diagnosis of GCA. The patient presented with sudden vision loss in the left eye following a prior episode of retinal artery occlusion in the right eye. Ophthalmoscopic examination revealed CRAO in the left eye. Additionally, tongue necrosis, a rare manifestation of GCA, was observed. The ESR was significantly elevated. A temporal artery biopsy supported the diagnosis of GCA. The patient was promptly referred for immunologist consultation and initiated on intravenous methylprednisolone therapy. This case highlights the diverse and potentially devastating nature of GCA, involving ocular and systemic manifestations. Bilateral CRAO and tongue necrosis are rare but significant complications of GCA. Prompt diagnosis and early initiation of corticosteroid therapy are crucial to prevent irreversible visual loss and further complications. A multidisciplinary approach involving ophthalmologists and other specialists is essential for the comprehensive management of GCA.

UNASSIGNED: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a large vessel (LV) vasculitis that affects people aged 50 years and older. Classically, GCA was considered a disease that involved branches of the carotid artery. However, the advent of new imaging techniques has allowed us to reconsider the clinical spectrum of this vasculitis.
UNASSIGNED: This review describes clinical differences between patients with the cranial GCA and those with a predominantly extracranial LV-GCA disease pattern. It highlights differences in the frequency of positive temporal artery biopsy depending on the predominant disease pattern and emphasizes the relevance of imaging techniques to identify patients with LV-GCA without cranial ischemic manifestations. The review shows that so far there are no well-established differences in genetic predisposition to GCA regardless of the predominant phenotype.
UNASSIGNED: The large branches of the extracranial arteries are frequently affected in GCA. Imaging techniques are useful to identify the presence of \'silent\' GCA in people presenting with polymyalgia rheumatica or with nonspecific manifestations. Whether these two different clinical presentations of GCA constitute a continuum in the clinical spectrum of the disease or whether they may be related but are definitely different conditions needs to be further investigated.

暂无摘要。

Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is the standard test for diagnosing giant cell arteritis. Our objective was to determine which specialists perform TABs and if there is variation across the United States. We performed a cross-sectional analysis in a multi-state health care system, evaluating differences between observed counts of surgical specialty by region, positive diagnoses by region, and positive diagnoses by specialty. Temporal arterial biopsy was performed on 3825 patients with the proportion of specialties performing TAB differing between regions. Temporal artery biopsy was performed by a significantly higher percentage of general surgeons in the Midwest (53.6%) and less vascular surgeons in the West (30.4%). The percentage of positive diagnoses was higher for vascular surgeons (32.7%). We concluded that TAB is performed by physicians of many specialties with the specialty performing most of these procedures varying by region. There is also a difference in the rate of positive diagnoses that varies with surgical specialty.

Giant cell arteritis (GCA), more common in Northern European populations, has limited data in Arabcountries. Our study reports GCA\'s clinical manifestations in Jordan and reviews published research on GCA across Arab nations. In this retrospective analysis, GCA patients diagnosed from January 2007 to March 2019 at a Jordanian academic medical center were included through referrals for temporal artery biopsy (TAB). A comprehensive search in PubMed, Scopus, and the DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) databases was conducted to identify all relevant English-language manuscripts from Arab countries on GCA without time limitations. Among 59 diagnosed GCA patients, 41 (69.5%) were clinically diagnosed with a negative TAB, and 19 (30.5%) had a positive result. Females comprised 74.6% (n = 44) with 1:3 male-female ratio. The mean age at diagnosis was 67.3 (± 9.5) years, with most presenting within two weeks (n = 40, 67.8%). Headache was reported by 54 patients (91.5%). Elevated ESR occurred in 51 patients (78%), with a mean of 81 ± 32.2 mm/hr. All received glucocorticoids for 13.1 ± 10 months. Azathioprine, Methotrexate, and Tocilizumab usage was 15.3% (n = 9), 8.5% (n = 5), and 3.4% (n = 2), respectively. Remission was observed in 57.6% (n=34), and 40.7% (n = 24) had a chronic clinical course on treatment. Males had higher biopsy-based diagnoses (p = .008), and biopsy-diagnosed patients were older (p = .043). The literature search yielded only 20 manuscripts originating in the Arab world. The predominant study types included case reports and retrospective analyses, with only one case series and onecase-control study.