taxes

Taxes
  • 文章类型: News
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:实施卫生税收政策以控制有害商品的消费和改善公共卫生成果的努力已在全球范围内得到了广泛认可。然而,它们的成功采用仍然是一项复杂的努力。这调查了围绕卫生税实施的挑战和机遇,特别关注印度尼西亚的地方政府,卫生税的权力下放背景仍未得到充分研究。
    方法:采用定性方法,使用问题驱动的政治经济学分析方法。
    方法:我们正在从2022年7月至9月在三个省-Lampung进行的总共12个焦点小组讨论(FGD)中收集数据,日惹和巴厘岛的特别地区/DaerahIstimewa,每个选择代表一种特定的商品:烟草,含糖饮料(SSB)和酒精饮料-我们探讨了卫生税收政策的多方面动态。
    方法:这些FGD涉及每个FGD的平均10名参与者,代表政府机构,非政府组织和消费者。
    结果:我们的研究结果表明,卫生税收政策有可能对公共卫生做出重大贡献。消费者了解烟草的健康风险,文化因素影响烟草和酒精消费。对于SSB,消费者缺乏对长期健康风险的认识令人担忧。最后,官僚主义的复杂和分散的政府阻碍了这三种商品的实施。
    结论:此外,这项研究强调了有效政策沟通的重要性。它强调了为公共卫生举措指定健康税收入的重要性。它还加强了将卫生税视为一项干预措施的必要性,这是全面公共卫生方法的一部分,包括广告限制和标准化包装等补充非财政措施。应对这些挑战对于充分发挥卫生税收政策的潜力至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: Efforts to implement health tax policies to control the consumption of harmful commodities and enhance public health outcomes have garnered substantial recognition globally. However, their successful adoption remains a complex endeavour. This investigates the challenges and opportunities surrounding health tax implementation, with a particular focus on subnational government in Indonesia, where the decentralisation context of health tax remains understudied.
    METHODS: Employing a qualitative methodology using a problem-driven political economy analysis approach.
    METHODS: We are collecting data from a total of 12 focus group discussions (FGDs) conducted between July and September 2022 in three provinces-Lampung, Special Region of/Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta and Bali, each chosen to represent a specific commodity: tobacco, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and alcoholic beverages-we explore the multifaceted dynamics of health tax policies.
    METHODS: These FGDs involved a mean of 10 participants in each FGD, representing governmental institutions, non-governmental organisations and consumers.
    RESULTS: Our findings reveal that health tax policies have the potential to contribute significantly to public health. Consumers understand tobacco\'s health risks, and cultural factors influence both tobacco and alcohol consumption. For SSBs, the consumers lack awareness of long-term health risks is concerning. Finally, bureaucratic complexiting and decentralised government hinder implementation for all three commodities.
    CONCLUSIONS: Furthermore, this study underscores the importance of effective policy communication. It highlights the importance of earmarking health tax revenues for public health initiatives. It also reinforces the need to see health taxes as one intervention as part of a comprehensive public health approach including complementary non-fiscal measures like advertising restrictions and standardised packaging. Addressing these challenges is critical for realising the full potential of health tax policies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对含糖饮料(SSB)分销商征收消费税,随后传递给消费者,是一项旨在降低心脏代谢疾病高患病率并产生公共卫生资金的政策。税收与较低的SSB购买和消费相关,但目前尚不清楚它们是否与青少年体重相关结局相关.
    确定SSB消费税与青年体重指数(BMI)轨迹的关联。
    这项队列研究于2009年至2020年进行,包括税收实施前6年和税收实施后4至6年。加州城市奥尔巴尼,伯克利,奥克兰,旧金山,实施SSB消费税,与加利福尼亚州40个人口统计学上匹配的控制城市进行了比较。参与者包括2至19岁的KaiserPermanente成员(基线),他们连续居住在选定的城市,其电子健康记录中记录了至少1个税前和1个税后BMI。数据分析于2021年1月至2023年5月进行。
    实施SSB消费税。
    将疾病控制和预防中心的年龄和性别特定的BMI百分位数以及实施后4至6年的税收实施前超重或肥胖青年的百分比与对照城市进行比较。使用差异差异(DID)方法进行统计分析。使用综合控制方法进行敏感性分析。
    总共44771名青年(基线时的平均[SD]年龄,6.4[4.2]岁;22337名女性[49.9%])居住在有SSB税的城市;345428名青年(平均[SD]年龄,6.9[4.2]岁;1710168名女性[49.5%])居住在控制城市。SSB税收实施后,暴露城市和控制城市之间的BMI百分位数平均变化总体差异为-1.64个百分点(95%CI,-3.10至-0.17个百分点)。与对照城市相比,超重或肥胖青年或肥胖青年的百分比没有显着总体差异。就BMI百分位数而言,所有DID估计对居住在暴露城市的年轻人都很重要(2017年年龄2-5岁,-2.06个百分点[95%CI,-4.04至-0.09个百分点];2017年年龄6-11岁,-2.79个百分点[95%CI,-4.29至-1.30个百分点]),超重或肥胖青年的百分比(2-5岁,-5.46个百分点[95%CI,-8.47至-2.44个百分点];年龄6-11岁,-4.23个百分点[95%CI,-6.90至-1.57个百分点]),以及肥胖青年的百分比(年龄2-5岁;-1.87个百分点[95%CI,-3.36至-0.38个百分点];年龄6-11岁,-1.85个百分点[95%CI,-3.46至-0.24个百分点])。与控制城市相比,男性的平均BMI百分位数变化显着(-1.98个百分点;95%CI,-3.48至-0.48个百分点),亚洲(-1.63个百分点;95%CI,-3.10至-0.16个百分点),和怀特(-2.58个百分点;95%CI,-4.11至-1.10个百分点)青年。与控制城市相比,暴露城市中的白人青年超重或肥胖的百分比(-3.73个百分点;95%CI,-6.11至-1.35个百分点)和肥胖的百分比(-2.78个百分点;95%CI,-4.18至-1.37个百分点)有所改善。
    在这项队列研究中,SSB消费税与青少年BMI百分位数较低相关。政策制定者应考虑实施SSB消费税,以防止或减少青少年超重和肥胖,最终,慢性疾病,尤其是12岁以下的儿童。
    UNASSIGNED: Levying excise taxes on sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) distributors, which are subsequently passed on to consumers, is a policy implemented to reduce the high prevalence of cardiometabolic disease and generate public health funding. Taxes are associated with lower SSB purchases and consumption, but it is unknown whether they are associated with weight-related outcomes in youth.
    UNASSIGNED: To determine the association of SSB excise taxes with youth body mass index (BMI) trajectories.
    UNASSIGNED: This cohort study was conducted from 2009 to 2020, including 6 years before tax implementation and 4 to 6 years after tax implementation. The California cities of Albany, Berkeley, Oakland, and San Francisco, which implemented SSB excise taxes, were compared against 40 demographically matched control cities in California. Participants included Kaiser Permanente members aged 2 to 19 years at cohort entry (baseline) with continuous residence in selected cities with at least 1 pretax and 1 posttax BMI recorded in their electronic health record. Data analysis was performed from January 2021 to May 2023.
    UNASSIGNED: Implementation of SSB excise taxes.
    UNASSIGNED: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention age-specific and sex-specific BMI percentiles and percentage of youth with overweight or obesity before tax implementation through 4 to 6 years after implementation were compared with control cities. Statistical analysis was conducted using the difference-in-differences (DID) method. A sensitivity analysis used the synthetic control method.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 44 771 youth (mean [SD] age at baseline, 6.4 [4.2] years; 22 337 female [49.9%]) resided in the cities with SSB taxes; 345 428 youth (mean [SD] age, 6.9 [4.2] years; 171 0168 female [49.5%]) resided in control cities. There was a -1.64-percentage point (95% CI, -3.10 to -0.17 percentage points) overall difference in the mean change of BMI percentile between exposure and control cities after SSB tax implementation. There was no significant overall difference in the percentage of youth with overweight or obesity or youth with obesity compared with control cities. All DID estimates were significant for youth residing in exposure cities in terms of BMI percentile (age 2-5 years in 2017, -2.06 percentage points [95% CI, -4.04 to -0.09 percentage points]; age 6-11 years in 2017, -2.79 percentage points [95% CI, -4.29 to -1.30 percentage points]), percentages of youth with overweight or obesity (age 2-5 years, -5.46 percentage points [95% CI, -8.47 to -2.44 percentage points]; age 6-11 years, -4.23 percentage points [95% CI, -6.90 to -1.57 percentage points]), and percentages of youth with obesity (age 2-5 years; -1.87 percentage points [95% CI, -3.36 to -0.38 percentage points]; age 6-11 years, -1.85 percentage points [95% CI, -3.46 to -0.24 percentage points]). Compared with control cities, changes in mean BMI percentiles were significant for male (-1.98 percentage points; 95% CI, -3.48 to -0.48 percentage points), Asian (-1.63 percentage points; 95% CI, -3.10 to -0.16 percentage points), and White (-2.58 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.11 to -1.10 percentage points) youth. Compared with control cities, White youth in exposure cities had improvements in the percentage with overweight or obesity (-3.73 percentage points; 95% CI, -6.11 to -1.35 percentage points) and the percentage with obesity (-2.78 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.18 to -1.37 percentage points).
    UNASSIGNED: In this cohort study, SSB excise taxes were associated with lower BMI percentile among youth. Policymakers should consider implementing SSB excise taxes to prevent or reduce youth overweight and obesity and, ultimately, chronic disease, particularly among children younger than 12 years.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    环境保护税法是我国为解决环境问题而采取的强制性环境规制措施。然而,随着实施的推进,EPTL产生了异化效应,损害了波特假说效应的实现。本研究利用中国重污染企业的样本数据,考察了EPTL调控的绿色技术创新的异化效应。根据实证检验结果:(1)征费和行政管理之间的协调,差别税率设置,税务信息共享,征管范围的界定,纳税申报咨询,和税率水平验证产生了异化效应;(2)EPTL的波特假说效应在中型企业和外资企业中最为显著。通过构建异化效应研究模型组,本研究分析了环境规制在我国社会经济背景下的应用,从而为发展绿色经济提供参考。
    Environmental Protection Tax Law (EPTL) is a compulsory environmental regulation measure adopted by China to deal with environmental problems. However, with the advancement of implementation, the EPTL produces a dissimilation effect and damages the realization of the Porter hypothesis effect. The study examines the dissimilation effect of green technology innovation regulated by the EPTL using sample data from heavy pollution firms in China. According to the empirical test results: (1) the coordination between levies and administrations, differential tax rate setting, tax information sharing, definition of the scope of levy and administration, tax declaration counseling, and tax rate level verification produce the dissimilation effect; (2) the Porter hypothesis effect of the EPTL is the most significant in medium-sized enterprises and foreign-funded enterprises. By constructing the research model group of dissimilation effect, this study analyzes the application of environmental regulation in China\'s social and economic background, thus providing a reference for developing of the green economy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    酒精给健康带来了巨大的负担,斯里兰卡的社会和经济体系。在当前的经济危机中,酒精税提供了必要的收入增加。然而,公众对斯里兰卡酒精政策的看法还没有得到很好的探索。
    这项意见调查的目的是了解公众对酒精危害的认识,酒精行业的影响,斯里兰卡实施酒精控制政策的障碍和促进者,以及公众对酒精政策的支持程度,特别是酒精产品的税收。
    通过整群抽样方法选择的997名参与者(男性和女性的比例为2:1)的街头拦截调查对面试官进行了问卷调查。进行双变量和多变量分析以确定相关性,并且p<0.05被认为是显著的。
    在受访者中,36.1%的人一生中至少饮酒一次,29.1%的人在过去12个月中饮酒,性别差异显著(女性-2.8%;男性-43.4%;p<0.001)。男性(81.4%)和女性(71.8%)占显著比例;p<0.017同意减少酒精消费的政策措施将使政府受益,其中包括显著比例(73.8%,p<0.008)的酒精使用者。绝大多数-72.8%-同意提高酒精价格将有助于解决斯里兰卡的酒精消费问题。此外,只有30.8%的男性和44.3%的女性认为,政府的酒精法规目前足以保护人们免受酒精伤害。回归分析显示,与女性相比,男性同意“旨在减少酒精消费的政策措施可以使公众受益”的说法是男性的2.43倍。然而,与18-33岁相比,50-64岁的人同意这一说法的可能性降低了40%。
    大多数公众包括饮酒的人,支持改善酒精相关政策,包括税收,并承认酒精消费对国家的负面影响。这为斯里兰卡加强和执行与酒精有关的政策以保护和改善公共卫生提供了明确的机会。
    UNASSIGNED: Alcohol imposes a significant burden on health, social and economic systems in Sri Lanka. In the present economic crisis taxes on alcohol provides necessary revenue increases. Yet, the perception of the public on alcohol policies in Sri Lanka is not well explored.
    UNASSIGNED: This opinion survey was conducted with the aim to understand the public\'s awareness on alcohol harm, alcohol industry influences, barriers and facilitators for implementing alcohol control policies in Sri Lanka, and the level of public support for alcohol policies, particularly taxes on alcohol products.
    UNASSIGNED: A street intercept survey among 997 participants (with a ratio of 2:1 for males and females) selected through a cluster sampling method responded to an interviewer administered questionnaire. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine associations and a p < 0.05 was considered significant.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the respondents, 36.1% have consumed alcohol at least once in their lifetime and 29.1% have consumed alcohol during the past 12 months with a significant gender difference (females - 2.8%; males- 43.4%; p < 0.001). Significant proportions of both men (81.4%) and women (71.8%); p < 0.017 agreed that policy measures to reduce alcohol consumption would benefit the government including a significant proportion (73.8%, p < 0.008) of alcohol users. The vast majority -72.8%- agreed that increasing alcohol prices would help address the alcohol consumption problem in Sri Lanka. Moreover, only 30.8% of men and 44.3% of women agreed that the government\'s alcohol laws are currently strong enough to protect people from alcohol harm. The regression analysis revealed that men are 2.43 times more in agreement with the statement that \"policy measures aimed at reducing alcohol consumption can benefit the public\" as compared to women. However, individuals aged 50-64 years are 40% less likely to agree with this statement as compared to 18-33 years.
    UNASSIGNED: The majority of the public, including people who consume alcohol, are supportive of improving alcohol related policies, including taxes, and acknowledge negative impact of alcohol consumption on the country. This presents a clear opportunity for Sri Lanka to strengthen and enforce the alcohol related policies to protect and improve public health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:评估含糖饮料(SSB)税收通常依赖于模拟模型。我们以德国为例,评估了对SSB税收的反应的假设如何影响与2型糖尿病(T2DM)相关的预计体重变化以及随后的健康和经济影响。
    方法:在主要分析中,我们使用边际价格弹性(PE)估算了德国按年龄和性别对SSB征收20%增值税时能量摄入的变化,并应用能量均衡模型预测体重变化.然后,我们量化了几个假设修改的影响:SSB自身PE调整为消费(M1)/基于替代荟萃分析(M2);SSB消费调整为漏报(M3);通过边际替代(M4a)或调整(M4b)交叉PE/卡路里变化的百分比(M4c)。我们还评估了替代税率为10%(S1)或30%(S2)的情况,包括果汁(S3)。我们计算了每个修改和情景的超重和肥胖率。我们模拟了对T2DM的影响,相关的医疗保健费用,和残疾调整寿命年(DALYs)在2011年德国成年人口的一生中使用马尔可夫模型。数据包括官方人口统计,全国调查,和荟萃分析。
    结果:在德国征收20%的增值税可以使肥胖的男性和女性人数减少210,800[138,800;294,100]和80,800[45,100;123,300],分别。在人口的一生中,这将导致适度的T2DM相关的健康和经济影响(避免了76,700个DALYs[42,500;120,600];节省了23.7亿欧元[1.33;3.71]的成本).政策影响因修改而变化很大(均为DALYs):(M1)94,800[51,500;150,700];(M2)164,200[99,500;243,500];(M3)52,600[22,500;91,100];(M4a)-18,100[-111,500;68,300];(M4b)25,800与修改有关的政策影响的可变性类似于替代政策方案之间的可变性(全部避免了DALYs):(S1)26,400[9,300;47,600];(S2)126,200[73,600;194,500];(S3)342,200[234,200;430,400]。
    结论:在SSB征税下预测的体重减轻对研究人员由于数据限制而经常需要的假设很敏感。因为这种可变性传播到对健康和经济影响的估计,在决策中使用结果时,应考虑由此产生的结构不确定性。
    BACKGROUND: Evaluating sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxation often relies on simulation models. We assess how assumptions about the response to SSB taxation affect the projected body weight change and subsequent health and economic impacts related to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using Germany as an example.
    METHODS: In the main analysis, we estimated changes in energy intake by age and sex under a 20% value-added tax on SSBs in Germany using marginal price elasticities (PE) and applied an energy equilibrium model to predict body weight changes. We then quantified the impact of several assumption modifications: SSB own-PE adjusted for consumption (M1)/based on alternative meta-analysis (M2); SSB consumption adjusted for underreporting (M3); substitution via marginal (M4a) or adjusted (M4b) cross-PE/as % of calorie change (M4c). We also assessed scenarios with alternative tax rates of 10% (S1) or 30% (S2) and including fruit juice (S3). We calculated overweight and obesity rates per modification and scenario. We simulated the impact on T2DM, associated healthcare costs, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) over the lifetime of the 2011 German adult population with a Markov model. Data included official demographics, national surveys, and meta-analyses.
    RESULTS: A 20% value-added tax in Germany could reduce the number of men and women with obesity by 210,800 [138,800; 294,100] and 80,800 [45,100; 123,300], respectively. Over the population\'s lifetime, this would lead to modest T2DM-related health and economic impacts (76,700 DALYs [42,500; 120,600] averted; €2.37 billion [1.33; 3.71] costs saved). Policy impacts varied highly across modifications (all in DALYs averted): (M1) 94,800 [51,500; 150,700]; (M2) 164,200 [99,500; 243,500]; (M3) 52,600 [22,500; 91,100]; (M4a) -18,100 [-111,500; 68,300]; (M4b) 25,800 [-31,400; 81,500]; (M4c) 46,700 [25,300; 77,200]. The variability in policy impact related to modifications was similar to the variability between alternative policy scenarios (all in DALYs averted): (S1) 26,400 [9,300; 47,600]; (S2) 126,200 [73,600; 194,500]; (S3) 342,200 [234,200; 430,400].
    CONCLUSIONS: Predicted body weight reductions under SSB taxation are sensitive to assumptions by researchers often needed due to data limitations. Because this variability propagates to estimates of health and economic impacts, the resulting structural uncertainty should be considered when using results in decision-making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    充足的水摄入对人体健康至关重要。含糖饮料税是减少肥胖和饮食相关非传染性疾病的最佳购买政策。以食物为基础的膳食指南(FBDG)促进健康的膳食模式。研究目的是评估含糖饮料税立法国家(2000-2023年)的国家FBDG,以促进水和阻止含糖饮料消费。我们开发了一个编码框架来对FBDG文档进行内容分析,并使用六个指标来识别消息和图像,以分配0-12的健康补水建议(HHR)得分,以比较国家和六个地区的FBDG。结果显示93个国家有含糖饮料税收立法,其中58个国家(62%)公布了FBDG(1998-2023年)。在审查的58个FBDG中,48(83%)的补充建议鼓励水和不鼓励含糖饮料。93个国家,13(14%)的HHR得分最高(11-12);22(24%)的HHR得分高(9-10);20(21%)的HHR得分中等(4-8);3(3%)的HHR得分低(0-3);35(38%)个国家没有FBDG。为了减少人群的健康风险,政府必须确保政策连贯性,通过开发鼓励水和阻止含糖饮料补充国家政策的FBDG来优化含糖饮料的税收影响。
    Adequate water intake is essential for human health. Sugary beverage taxes are a best buy policy to reduce obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases. Food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) promote healthy dietary patterns. The study purpose was to evaluate national FBDGs for countries with sugary beverage tax legislation (2000-2023) to promote water and discourage sugary beverage consumption. We developed a coding framework to conduct a content analysis of FBDG documents, and used six indicators to identify messages and images to assign healthy hydration recommendation (HHR) scores from 0-12 to compare FBDGs across countries and six regions. Results showed 93 countries with sugary beverage tax legislation of which 58 countries (62%) had published FBDGs (1998-2023). Of 58 FBDGs reviewed, 48 (83%) had complementary recommendations that encouraged water and discouraged sugary beverages. Of 93 countries, 13 (14%) had the highest HHR scores (11-12); 22, (24%) had high HHR scores (9-10); 20 (21%) had medium HHR scores (4-8); 3 (3%) had low HHR scores (0-3); and 35 (38%) countries had no FBDGs. To reduce health risks for populations, governments must ensure policy coherence to optimize sugary beverage tax impacts by developing FBDGs that encourage water and discourage sugary beverages complementary to national policies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:烟草的成本是戒烟的主要原因之一。荷兰在9个月内两次提高了烟草税:2020年4月每包增加1欧元,2021年1月每包增加0.12欧元。这项研究调查了人们报告在多大程度上考虑由于即将到来的税收增加而辞职,以及它与他们年龄的关系,收入或教育水平。此外,我们研究了思考戒烟是否与戒烟意图和戒烟行为有关,以及这些关联对于两次增税是否不同。
    方法:来自国际烟草控制(ITC)荷兰调查的纵向数据,使用了队列2(N=5919个观测值;波1(2020年2月-3月):n=2051;波2(2020年9月-11月):n=1919;波3(2021年6月-7月):n=1949)。广义估计方程(GEE)回归适合于测试由于税收增加和税后增加的辞职意图之间的关联。严重的戒烟尝试,戒烟(每月≤1支香烟),以及社会人口统计学变量。
    结果:大约一半的吸烟者报告说,由于即将到来的税收增加,他们考虑戒烟(第1波=51.3%(n=1052);第2波=47.3%(n=849))。报告由于即将到来的税收增加而考虑戒烟的个人更有可能增加他们的戒烟意愿(aOR:2.00,p≤.001)或进行了严重的戒烟尝试(aOR:1.48,p≤.001)。在第2波到第3波(2021年后增加)之间尝试戒烟的人比在第1波到第2波(2020年后增加)之间尝试戒烟的人多。我们没有发现波浪和思考退出之间的相互作用效应。退出尝试,戒烟。
    结论:增税刺激人们考虑戒烟。考虑由于即将到来的税收增加而辞职与更积极的辞职意图和认真的辞职尝试有关。
    BACKGROUND: The cost of tobacco is one of the most reported reasons to quit smoking. The Netherlands increased tobacco taxes twice in the span of nine months: a €1 increase per pack in April 2020, and a €0.12 increase per pack in January 2021. This study examines to what extent people report to think about quitting due to the upcoming tax increase(s), as well as how it relates to their age, income or educational level. Additionally, we examined whether thinking about quitting was associated with quit intention and quit behaviour, and whether these associations were different for the two tax increases.
    METHODS: Longitudinal data from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands Surveys, Cohort 2 were used (N = 5919 observations; wave 1 (February - March 2020): n = 2051; wave 2 (September - November 2020): n = 1919; wave 3 (June - July 2021): n = 1949). Generalised Estimating Equation (GEE) regressions were fit to test the associations between thinking about quitting due to the tax increase and post-tax increases in quit intention, serious quit attempts, and quitting smoking (≤ 1 cigarette a month), as well as sociodemographic variables.
    RESULTS: Circa half of the people who smoke reported thinking about quitting smoking due to the upcoming tax increase (Wave 1 = 51.3% (n = 1052); Wave 2 = 47.3% (n = 849)). Individuals who reported thinking about quitting smoking due to upcoming tax increase(s) were more likely to have increased their quit intention (aOR: 2.00, p ≤ .001) or have carried out a serious quit attempt (aOR:1.48, p ≤ .001) post-tax increase. More people attempted to quit smoking between wave 2 and 3 (post 2021 increase) than between wave 1 and 2 (post 2020 increase). We did not find an interaction effect between wave and thinking about quitting for quit intention, quit attempts, and quitting smoking.
    CONCLUSIONS: Tax increases stimulate people to think about quitting. Thinking about quitting due to an upcoming tax increase was associated with more positive quit intention and serious quit attempts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号