OBJECTIVE: Novel interventions (axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel], lisocabtagene maraleucel [liso-cel], tafasitamab-lenalidomide [Tafa-L], polatuzumab-rituximab-bendamustine [pola-BR]) improve clinical outcomes in second-line (2 L) treatment of transplant-ineligible patients with early relapse or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The costs vary depending on the respective treatment regimen and the treatment duration, difficult comparability in reimbursement decisions. The objective was to analyze the health economic impacts of novel 2 L interventions and conventional immunochemotherapies (bendamustine-rituximab [BR], rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin [R-GemOx]) from a German healthcare payer\'s perspective as a function of treatment duration.
METHODS: An economic model was developed to compare treatment costs of 2 L interventions depending on the treatment duration. Treatment duration was measured by progression-free survival (PFS), identified based on a systematic review. Total and average costs were calculated over 5 years to evaluate incremental costs at median PFS for each intervention.
RESULTS: Average costs per month at median PFS ranged from €2846 (95% CI: 5067-1641) to €40 535 (95% CI: 91180-N/A) for BR and liso-cel, respectively. Incremental costs at the lowest median PFS (R-GemOx: 5.3 months) revealed -€664, €5560, €11 817, €53 145, and €67 745 for BR, Tafa-L, pola-BR, axi-cel, and liso-cel as compared to R-GemOx, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Analyses uncovered a variation of incremental costs of 2 L transplant-ineligible DLBCL interventions as a function of time leading to amortization of high-priced interventions.

Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) require additional treatments, especially those not eligible or not responding to high dose cytotoxic chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Over the last few years, several new treatments have been developed and approved for these patients, among them of particular relevance are those targeting CD19. Tafasitamab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting CD19, composed of a modified fragment crystallizable (Fc) region engineered with higher affinity for Fc gamma receptors (FcγR) receptors, leading to increased cytotoxicity through natural killer cells and macrophages (antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis). In this product review, we will discuss its mechanism of action, safety profile and efficacy results from clinical trials that led to its approval in combination with lenalidomide for patients with R/R DLBCL ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous transplantation.

Overall, around 40% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have refractory disease or relapse after the first line of treatment. Until relatively recently, the prognosis of patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL was very poor and treatment options were very limited. In recent years, several novel therapies have been approved that provide more effective options than conventional chemotherapy and that have manageable toxicity profiles. CAR-T cell therapy has become the new standard treatment for patients with refractory or early relapsed DLBCL, based on the positive results of the phase 3 ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM clinical trials. This review addresses the role of CAR-T therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of these patients and other approved options for patients who are not candidates for transplant, such as the combinations of polatuzumab vedotin with bendamustine and rituximab, and tafasitamab with lenalidomide.

Several CD19 targeted antibody-based therapeutics are currently available for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including the Fc-modified antibody immunotherapy tafasitamab. This therapeutic landscape warrants the evaluation of potential sequencing approaches. Prior to a subsequent CD19-targeted therapy, CD19 expression on tafasitamab-treated patient biopsy samples may be assessed. However, no standardized methods for its detection are currently available. In this context, selecting a tafasitamab-competing CD19 detection antibody for immunohistochemistry (IHC) or flow cytometry (FC) may lead to misinterpreting epitope masking by tafasitamab as antigen loss or downregulation.
We analyzed a comprehensive panel of commercially available CD19 detection antibody clones for IHC and FC using competition assays on tafasitamab pre-treated cell lines. To remove bound tafasitamab from the cell surface, an acidic dissociation protocol was used. Antibody affinities for CD19 were measured using Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) or Bio-Layer Interferometry (BLI).
While CD19 was successfully detected on tafasitamab pre-treated samples using all 7 tested IHC antibody clones, all 8 tested FC antibody clones were confirmed to compete with tafasitamab. An acidic dissociation was demonstrated essential to circumvent CD19 masking by tafasitamab and avoid false negative FC results.
The current study highlights the importance of selecting appropriate CD19 detection tools and techniques for correct interpretation of CD19 expression. The findings presented herein can serve as a guideline to investigators and may help navigate treatment strategies in the clinical setting.

Despite recent advances in the treatment of aggressive lymphomas, a significant fraction of patients still succumbs to their disease. Thus, novel therapies are urgently needed. As the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab and the CD19-targeting antibody tafasitamab share distinct modes of actions, we investigated if dual-targeting of aggressive lymphoma B-cells by combining rituximab and tafasitamab might increase cytotoxic effects.
Antibody single and combination efficacy was determined investigating different modes of action including direct cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) in in vitro and in vivo models of aggressive B-cell lymphoma comprising diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and Burkitt lymphoma (BL).
Three different sensitivity profiles to antibody monotherapy or combination treatment were observed in in vitro models: while 1/11 cell lines was primarily sensitive to tafasitamab and 2/11 to rituximab, the combination resulted in enhanced cell death in 8/11 cell lines in at least one mode of action. Treatment with either antibody or the combination resulted in decreased expression of the oncogenic transcription factor MYC and inhibition of AKT signaling, which mirrored the cell line-specific sensitivities to direct cytotoxicity. At last, the combination resulted in a synergistic survival benefit in a PBMC-humanized Ramos NOD/SCID mouse model.
This study demonstrates that the combination of tafasitamab and rituximab improves efficacy compared to single-agent treatments in models of aggressive B-cell lymphoma in vitro and in vivo.

The outcomes of Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Diffuse Large B-cell lymphoma have been historically poor. The recent development of several novel therapies including CD19 directed agents has improved the prognosis of this disease significantly. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has drastically changed the treatment of R/R DLBCL, but it is still associated with significant barriers and limited access. Tafasitamab (an anti-CD19 engineered monoclonal antibody), in addition to lenalidomide, has shown significant efficacy with exceptionally durable responses in patients with R/R DLBCL who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Tafasitamab-lenalidomide and certain other therapies (ie, antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies) are important treatment options for patients who are ineligible for CAR-T due to co-morbidities or lack of access, and patients with rapid progression of disease who are unable to wait for manufacturing of CAR-T. This review will thus discuss currently approved and recently studied targeted treatment options for patients with R/R DLBCL with an emphasis on CAR-T alternative options, particularly Tafasitamab-lenalidomide.

RE-MIND2 (NCT04697160) compared patient outcomes from the L-MIND (NCT02399085) trial of tafasitamab+lenalidomide with those of patients treated with other therapies for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who are autologous stem cell transplant ineligible. We present outcomes data for three pre-specified treatments not assessed in the primary analysis. Data were retrospectively collected from sites in North America, Europe, and the Asia Pacific region. Patients were aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed DLBCL and received ≥2 systemic therapies for DLBCL (including ≥1 anti-CD20 therapy). Patients enrolled in the observational and L-MIND cohorts were matched using propensity score-based 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching, balanced for six covariates. Tafasitamab+lenalidomide was compared with polatuzumab vedotin+bendamustine+rituximab (pola-BR), rituximab+lenalidomide (R2), and CD19-chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included treatment response and progression-free survival. From 200 sites, 3,454 patients were enrolled in the observational cohort. Strictly matched patient pairs consisted of tafasitamab+lenalidomide versus pola-BR (n = 24 pairs), versus R2 (n = 33 pairs), and versus CAR-T therapies (n = 37 pairs). A significant OS benefit was observed with tafasitamab+lenalidomide versus pola-BR (HR: 0.441; p = 0.034) and R2 (HR: 0.435; p = 0.012). Comparable OS was observed in tafasitamab+lenalidomide and CAR-T cohorts (HR: 0.953, p = 0.892). Tafasitamab+lenalidomide appeared to improve survival outcomes versus pola-BR and R2, and comparable outcomes were observed versus CAR-T. Although based on limited patient numbers, these data may help to contextualize emerging therapies for R/R DLBCL. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04697160 (January 6, 2021).

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) accounts for approximately 24% of new cases of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the US each year. Up to 50% of patients relapse or are refractory (R/R) to the standard first-line treatment option, R-CHOP. The anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody tafasitamab, in combination with lenalidomide (LEN), is an NCCN preferred regimen for transplant-ineligible patients with R/R DLBCL and received accelerated approval in the US (July 2020) and conditional marketing authorization in Europe (August 2021) and other countries, based on data from the L-MIND study. The recommended dose of tafasitamab is 12 mg/kg by intravenous infusion, administered in combination with LEN 25 mg for 12 cycles, followed by tafasitamab monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tafasitamab + LEN is associated with durable responses in patients with R/R DLBCL. The majority of clinically significant treatment-associated adverse events are attributable to LEN and can be managed with dose modification and supportive therapy. We provide guidelines for the management of patients with R/R DLBCL treated with tafasitamab and LEN in routine clinical practice, including elderly patients and those with renal and hepatic impairment, and advice regarding patient education as part of a comprehensive patient engagement plan. Our recommendations include LEN administration at a reduced dose if required in patients unable to tolerate the recommended dose. No dose modification is required for tafasitamab in special patient populations.

BACKGROUND: Durable responses with the immunotherapy tafasitamab+lenalidomide were previously reported in ASCT-ineligible patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) in the Phase II L-MIND trial (NCT02399085). Based on L-MIND, tafasitamab+lenalidomide received accelerated approval (US) and conditional approval (EU and other countries) in this setting.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the long-term efficacy and safety of tafasitamab+lenalidomide in L-MIND patients who received treatment for ≥2 years.
METHODS: Ongoing, multicenter, open-label, single-arm Phase II study. Eligibility: ≥18 years old, histologically confirmed DLBCL, and 1-3 prior systemic therapies for DLBCL, including ≥1 anti-CD20 therapy. Tafasitamab: twelve 28-day cycles (12 mg/kg IV) QW during Cycles 1-3, with a loading dose on Cycle 1 Day 4; Q2W Cycles 4-12. Lenalidomide: 25 mg PO Cycles 1-12 Days 1-21. Cycle 13+ tafasitamab monotherapy Q2W until disease progression. Time-to-event, treatment response, and safety endpoints were assessed.
RESULTS: Of 80 patients in the full analysis set, 27 (34%) received treatment for ≥2 years (median: 4.3 years). At data cut-off (February 15, 2022), 23 of 27 patients were confirmed alive, one was lost to follow-up, one died with unknown cause, and two died following adverse events (AEs) unrelated to study treatment. Thirteen patients remained on treatment, including six with treatment ≥5 years. Fourteen patients discontinued tafasitamab after ≥2 years due to progressive disease (n=4), patient/physician\'s decision (n=8), and non-treatment-related fatal AEs (n=2: one each, COVID-19 and cardiovascular AE). Among the 27 patients who received treatment for ≥2 years, the AE analysis for patients receiving tafasitamab+lenalidomide combination therapy (Cycles 1-12) and tafasitamab monotherapy (Cycles 13-24) by exposure-adjusted incidence revealed lower incidence of AEs during tafasitamab monotherapy compared with combination therapy. The majority of AEs were Grade 1-2. The most common AEs (≥1 event/patient-year) were neutropenia and diarrhea during combination (incidence, all-grade/Grade ≥3 AEs: 3.87/1.91 and 1.04/0.04, respectively) and following monotherapy (incidence, all-grade/Grade ≥3 AEs: 0.87/0.45 and 0.32/0.0, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Tafasitamab+lenalidomide followed by tafasitamab monotherapy provided durable responses, with long-term treatment efficacy in those patients who received tafasitamab for up to 5 years. The adverse event burden decreased as patients transitioned from combination therapy to tafasitamab monotherapy.
BACKGROUND: MorphoSys AG.

Tafasitamab+lenalidomide (LEN), a chemo-free immunotherapy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), demonstrated efficacy in autologous stem cell transplant-ineligible patients in the single-arm L-MIND study (NCT02399085). RE-MIND2 (NCT04697160), an observational, retrospective cohort study, compared patient outcomes from L-MIND with matched patient cohorts treated with other systemic therapies. Prolonged overall survival (OS) with tafasitamab+LEN was detected compared to a cohort of pooled systemic therapies (PST), bendamustine+rituximab (BR), rituximab+gemcitabine+oxaliplatin, polatuzumab vedotin+BR (pola-BR), and rituximab+LEN (R2). Comparable OS was detected versus CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies (CAR-T). However, limited information is available on the comparative effectiveness of tafasitamab+LEN in specific subpopulations. This study aimed to determine the relative effectiveness of tafasitamab+LEN versus other treatments for R/R DLBCL in clinically relevant patient subgroups in the absence of head-to-head trials. The L-MIND cohort was matched with RE-MIND2 patients using estimated propensity score-based 1:1 nearest neighbor matching balanced for a minimum of six covariates. Sensitivity analyses were conducted. The study was conducted at academic, public, and private hospitals in Europe, North America, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients were ≥18 years old with histologically confirmed DLBCL and ≥2 prior systemic therapies for DLBCL, including ≥1 anti-CD20 therapy. Data are presented for tafasitamab+LEN versus PST, versus pola-BR, versus R2, and versus CAR-T. Hypothesis-generating analyses were conducted for patient subgroups of number of extranodal sites (ENS) (0-1 vs. ≥2) and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (yes vs. no). The primary endpoint was OS. Of 3,454 patients enrolled, 961, 106, 106, and 149 were treated with PST, pola-BR, R2, and CAR-T, resulting in 76, 24, 33, and 37 matched pairs for patients receiving tafasitamab+LEN, respectively. Hazard ratios for OS for patients with ≥2 ENS were 0.803, 0.524, 0.478, and 1.459, and for patients with elevated LDH were 0.627, 0.585, 0.420, and 1.663, for comparisons of tafasitamab+LEN versus PST, pola-BR, R2, and CAR-T, respectively. There was a trend towards favoring tafasitamab+LEN in most patient subgroups. The combination may be associated with improved OS versus selected systemic therapies for certain patients with high-risk disease. These analyses are not powered for statistical comparison and should be interpreted with caution. Funding: MorphoSys AG.