tachycardia

心动过速
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:当受伤的患者到达急诊科(ED)时,及时和适当的护理至关重要。休克指数儿科年龄调整(SIPA)已被证明可以准确识别需要紧急干预的儿科患者。然而,没有研究评估SIPA对年龄校正性心动过速(AT)的作用.这项研究旨在将SIPA与AT在预测死亡率等结果方面进行比较。重伤,以及儿科创伤患者紧急干预的必要性。
    方法:这是从2013-2020年创伤质量改善计划参与者使用文件(TQIPPUFs)提取的患者数据的回顾性横断面分析。包括4-16岁的患者,其损伤机制钝,损伤严重程度评分(ISS)>15。36,517名儿童符合这一标准。灵敏度,特异性,过度审判,并计算了未分诊率,以比较AT和升高的SIPA作为严重损伤和需要紧急干预的预测因子的有效性.紧急干预措施包括开颅手术,气管插管,开胸手术,剖腹手术,或胸管放置在24小时内到达。
    结果:AT将59%的患者归类为“高风险”,“而SIPA提高了26%。与AT患者相比,SIPA升高的患者在24小时内需要输血的比例更高(22%vs.12%,分别为;p<0.001)。SIPA升高组的住院死亡率高于AT(10%vs.5%,分别;p<0.001)以及对紧急手术干预的需求(43%vs.分别为32%;p<0.001)。在SIPA升高患者中,需要输血的3级或更高肝/脾撕裂伤也比AT患者更常见(8%vs.4%,分别为;p<0.001)。在所有结果中,与SIPA相比,AT表现出更高的敏感性,但特异性较低。与SIPA相比,AT显示出过审和过审比率提高,但这归因于确定样本中有很大一部分是“高风险”。\"
    结论:AT在死亡率敏感性方面优于SIPA,儿童创伤患者的损伤严重程度和紧急干预措施,而SIPA在这些结局中的特异性很高。
    BACKGROUND: When an injured patient arrives in the Emergency Department (ED), timely and appropriate care is crucial. Shock Index Pediatric Age-Adjusted (SIPA) has been shown to accurately identify pediatric patients in need of emergency interventions. However, no study has evaluated SIPA against age-adjusted tachycardia (AT). This study aims to compare SIPA with AT in predicting outcomes such as mortality, severe injury, and the need for emergent intervention in pediatric trauma patients.
    METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patient data abstracted from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files (TQIP PUFs) for years 2013-2020. Patients aged 4-16 with blunt mechanism of injury and injury severity score (ISS) > 15 were included. 36,517 children met this criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, overtriage, and undertriage rates were calculated to compare the effectiveness of AT and elevated SIPA as predictors of severe injuries and need for emergent intervention. Emergent interventions included craniotomy, endotracheal intubation, thoracotomy, laparotomy, or chest tube placement within 24 h of arrival.
    RESULTS: AT classified 59% of patients as \"high risk,\" while elevated SIPA identified 26%. Compared to AT patients, a greater proportion of patients with elevated SIPA required a blood transfusion within 24 h (22% vs. 12%, respectively; p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher for the elevated SIPA group than AT (10% vs. 5%, respectively; p < 0.001) as well as the need for emergent operative interventions (43% vs. 32% respectively; p < 0.001). Grade 3 or higher liver/spleen lacerations requiring blood transfusion were also more common among elevated SIPA patients than AT patients (8% vs. 4%, respectively; p < 0.001). AT demonstrated greater sensitivity but lower specificity compared to SIPA across all outcomes. AT showed improved overtriage and undertriage rates compared to SIPA, but this is attributed to identifying a large proportion of the sample as \"high risk.\"
    CONCLUSIONS: AT outperforms SIPA in sensitivity for mortality, injury severity and emergent interventions in pediatric trauma patients while the specificity of SIPA is high across these outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项荟萃分析旨在确定尽管初次复苏但仍有持续性心动过速的败血症患者是否可以从超短效β受体阻滞剂中受益。
    来自MEDLINE的相关研究,Cochrane图书馆,和Embase由两名独立的研究者进行搜索.使用RevMan5.3版(Cochrane协作)进行统计分析。
    共确定了10项研究并纳入荟萃分析。结果表明,尽管初次复苏,但对伴有持续性心动过速的败血症患者使用超短作用β受体阻滞剂(艾司洛尔/兰地洛尔)与28天死亡率降低显着相关(风险比[RR],0.73;95%置信区间[CI],0.57-0.93;p=0.01)。亚组分析显示,脓毒症患者服用艾司洛尔与较低的28天死亡率显着相关(RR,0.68;95%CI,0.55-0.84;p<0.001),而兰地洛尔组和对照组之间没有显着差异(RR,0.98;95%CI,0.41-2.34;p=0.96)。两组在90天死亡率方面没有显着差异。平均动脉压(MAP),乳酸(Lac)水平,心脏指数(CI),和肌钙蛋白I(TnI)在登记后24小时。
    荟萃分析表明,在持续性心动过速患者中使用艾司洛尔,尽管有最初的复苏,与28天死亡率显着降低有关。因此,本研究主张在尽管初次复苏仍存在心动过速的情况下,考虑使用艾司洛尔治疗脓毒症.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis aims to identify whether patients with sepsis who have persistent tachycardia despite initial resuscitation can benefit from ultrashort-acting β-blockers.
    UNASSIGNED: Relevant studies from MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched by two independent investigators. RevMan version 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration) was used for statistical analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 10 studies were identified and incorporated into the meta-analysis. The results showed that the administration of ultrashort-acting β-blockers (esmolol/landiolol) in patients with sepsis with persistent tachycardia despite initial resuscitation was significantly associated with a lower 28-day mortality rate (risk ratio [RR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.93; and p˂0.01). Subgroup analysis showed that the administration of esmolol in patients with sepsis was significantly associated with a lower 28-day mortality rate (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55-0.84; and p˂0.001), while there was no significant difference between the landiolol and control groups (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.41-2.34; and p = 0.96). No significant differences between the two groups were found in 90-day mortality, mean arterial pressure (MAP), lactate (Lac) level, cardiac index (CI), and troponin I (TnI) at 24 h after enrollment.
    UNASSIGNED: The meta-analysis indicated that the use of esmolol in patients with persistent tachycardia, despite initial resuscitation, was linked to a notable reduction in 28-day mortality rates. Therefore, this study advocates for the consideration of esmolol in the treatment of sepsis in cases where tachycardia persists despite initial resuscitation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    一个10岁的孩子,绝育的男性,金毛犬被推荐用于手术矫正后代囊肿。肌内注射乙酰丙嗪(0.02mg/kg)和美沙酮(0.5mg/kg)用于镇静,丙泊酚(2mg/kg)和咪达唑仑(0.2mg/kg)静脉内用于麻醉诱导,异氟烷在氧气中用于麻醉维持。罗库溴铵(0.5mg/kg),神经肌肉阻断剂,静脉内给药,以促进手术时眼睛的中央定位。罗库溴铵给药10分钟内,狗变得心动过速和低血压。最初的干预措施并未解决血流动力学异常,但静脉注射苯海拉明(0.8mg/kg)可成功缓解血流动力学异常。狗在整个剩余过程中保持稳定,并经历了平稳和平稳的恢复。虽然很难确认在该临床病例中观察到的血液动力学变化仅由罗库溴铵的给药引起,对心血管变化的观察,事件发生时间和对治疗的反应提示罗库溴铵引起的组胺反应,苯海拉明治疗成功.
    A 10-year-old, neutered male, Golden Retriever dog presented for surgical correction of a descemetocele. Acepromazine (0.02 mg/kg) and methadone (0.5 mg/kg) were administered intramuscularly for sedation, propofol (2 mg/kg) and midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) were administered intravenously for anaesthetic induction and isoflurane in oxygen was utilised for anaesthetic maintenance. Rocuronium (0.5 mg/kg), a neuromuscular blocking agent, was administered intravenously to facilitate central positioning of the eye for surgery. Within 10 min of rocuronium administration, the dog became tachycardic and hypotensive. Hemodynamic aberrations did not resolve with initial interventions but were successfully mitigated with the administration of diphenhydramine (0.8 mg/kg) intravenously. The dog remained stable throughout the remainder of the procedure and experienced a smooth and uneventful recovery. While it is difficult to confirm that the hemodynamic changes observed in this clinical case resulted solely from administration of rocuronium, the observance of the cardiovascular changes, timing of events and response to therapy suggest that rocuronium elicited a histamine response that was successfully treated with diphenhydramine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    氟卡尼是一种用于治疗室上性和室性心律失常的药物。用药过量的病例很少见,然而,会导致明显的心脏效应.在以前的氟卡尼毒性病例中,用碳酸氢钠治疗,据报道,静脉内脂肪乳剂和胺碘酮可有效预防心血管虚脱和恢复基线心律.这里,我们介绍了一例40多岁的男性患者出现氟卡尼过量并伴有宽复杂性心动过速,在胺碘酮未能使QRS间期正常化后,患者接受了静脉碳酸氢钠治疗.
    Flecainide is a medication used to treat supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Cases of overdoses are rare, however, can lead to significant cardiac effects. In previous cases of flecainide toxicity, treatment with sodium bicarbonate, intravenous lipid emulsion and amiodarone have been reported to be effective in preventing cardiovascular collapse and reestablishing baseline rhythm. Here, we present a case of a man in his 40s presented with flecainide overdose with wide-complex tachycardia that was treated with intravenous sodium bicarbonate following failure of amiodarone to normalise QRS interval.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着诊断和外科技术的进步,成人患者先天性心脏病(CHD)的患病率上升。手术改变和血流动力学改变增加了心律失常的易感性,影响发病率和死亡率,心律失常是导致住院和猝死的主要原因。冠心病患者通常同时出现室上性和室性心律失常,每种CHD类型与不同的心律失常模式相关。大折返性房性心动过速,特别是三尖瓣峡部依赖性颤振,经常被报道。室性心律失常,包括单形性室性心动过速,普遍存在,尤其是有手术疤痕的患者.药物治疗包括抗心律失常和抗凝药物,尽管数据有限,但潜在的不利影响。导管消融是首选,由于解剖学的复杂性和血管通路的挑战,要求细致的程序规划。将成像技术与电解剖导航相结合可增强结果。然而,由于解剖学上的变异性,猝死的风险分层仍然具有挑战性.这篇文章实际上回顾了最常见的快速性心律失常,治疗方案,以及这些患者的临床管理策略。
    The prevalence of congenital heart disease (CHD) in adult patients has risen with advances in diagnostic and surgical techniques. Surgical modifications and hemodynamic changes increase the susceptibility to arrhythmias, impacting morbidity and mortality rates, with arrhythmias being the leading cause of hospitalizations and sudden deaths. Patients with CHD commonly experience both supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias, with each CHD type associated with different arrhythmia patterns. Macroreentrant atrial tachycardias, particularly cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent flutter, are frequently reported. Ventricular arrhythmias, including monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, are prevalent, especially in patients with surgical scars. Pharmacological therapy involves antiarrhythmic and anticoagulant drugs, though data are limited with potential adverse effects. Catheter ablation is preferred, demanding meticulous procedural planning due to anatomical complexity and vascular access challenges. Combining imaging techniques with electroanatomic navigation enhances outcomes. However, risk stratification for sudden death remains challenging due to anatomical variability. This article practically reviews the most common tachyarrhythmias, treatment options, and clinical management strategies for these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:心房颤动(AF)是最常见的持续性心律失常。心脏复律是一种恢复正常/窦性心律的节律控制策略,并且可以通过药物(药理学)或同步电击(电复律)来实现。
    目的:评估药物和电复律治疗心房颤动(AF)的疗效和安全性,房扑和房性心动过速.
    方法:我们搜索了CENTRAL,MEDLINE,Embase,会议论文集引文索引-科学(CPCI-S)和三个试验寄存器(ClinicalTrials.gov,WHOICTRP和ISRCTN),2023年2月14日。
    方法:我们纳入了个体患者水平的随机对照试验(RCT)。患者群体年龄≥18岁,有任何类型和持续时间的房颤,房扑或其他持续性相关房性心律失常,不是由于可逆原因而发生的。
    方法:我们使用标准Cochrane方法来收集数据,并使用R中的netmeta软件包使用标准频率图理论方法进行网络荟萃分析。我们使用GRADE来评估我们在研究结果摘要中提供的证据的质量,并对确定性进行判断。我们使用风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)计算差异,并使用P值对治疗进行排名。我们评估了临床和统计异质性,并对主要结果和急性手术成功的网络进行了拆分。由于担心违反传递性假设。
    结果:我们包括112条RCT(139条记录),我们汇集了15,968例患者的数据。平均年龄为47~72岁,男性患者比例为38%~92%。79项试验被认为至少有一个领域存在高偏倚风险,32个没有高风险的偏向域,但至少有一个领域被归类为不确定风险,一项研究被认为是所有领域的低风险。对于阵发性房颤(35项试验),与安慰剂相比,心尖前(AA)/前后(AP)双相截断指数波形(BTE)复律(RR:2.42;95%CI1.65至3.56),奎尼丁(RR:2.23;95%CI1.49至3.34),伊布利特(RR:2.00;95%CI1.28至3.12),普罗帕酮(RR:1.98;95%CI1.67至2.34),胺碘酮(RR:1.69;95%CI1.42至2.02),索他洛尔(RR:1.58;95%CI1.08~2.31)和普鲁卡因胺(RR:1.49;95%CI1.13~1.97)可能导致在出院或研究随访结束前窦性心律维持大幅增加(证据确定性:中度)。AA/AP增量的效应大小较大,而随后的干预措施则逐渐变小。尽管证据的确定性很低,在此结果中,antazoline可能导致大幅增加(RR:28.60;95%CI1.77至461.30)。同样,低确定性证据表明氟卡尼的这一结果大幅增加(RR:2.17;95%CI1.68至2.79),vernakalant(RR:2.13;95%CI1.52至2.99),和镁(RR:1.73;95%CI0.79至3.79)。对于持续性房颤(26次试验),为电复律创建了一个网络,表明,与带补丁的APBTE增量能量相比,带补丁的APBTE最大能量(RR1.35,95%CI1.17至1.55)可能导致大幅增加,和主动加压APBTE增加的能量与贴片(RR:1.14,95%CI1.00~1.131)可能导致出院时或研究随访结束时窦性心律的维持增加(证据确定性:高).使用带桨的APBTE增量(RR:1.03,95%CI0.98至1.09;证据确定性:低)可能会导致轻微增加,和APMDS增量桨(RR:0.95,95%CI0.86至1.05;证据确定性:低)可能导致疗效略有下降。另一方面,使用补丁的APMDS增量能量(RR:0.78,95%CI0.70至0.87),带补丁的AARBW增量能量(RR:0.76,95%CI0.66至0.88),带补丁的APRBW增量能量(RR:0.76,95%CI0.68至0.86),与带补丁的APBTE增量能量相比,带补丁的AAMDS增量能量(RR:0.76,95%CI0.67至0.86)和带桨的AAMDS增量能量(RR:0.68,95%CI0.53至0.83)可能导致该结果降低(证据确定性:中等)。药物复律网络显示,与胺碘酮相比,贝普地尔(RR:2.29,95%CI1.26至4.17)和奎定(RR:1.53,(95%CI1.01至2.32)可能导致出院或研究结束时窦性心律维持大量增加(证据确定性:中度)。多非利特(RR:0.79,95%CI0.56至1.44),索他洛尔(RR:0.89,95%CI0.67至1.18),与胺碘酮相比,普罗帕酮(RR:0.79,95%CI0.50至1.25)和吡西卡尼(RR:0.39,95%CI0.02至7.01)可能导致该结果降低,但是证据的确定性很低。对于房扑(14项试验),只能为抗心律失常药物创建网络。使用安慰剂作为常见的比较器,伊布特利(RR:21.45,95%CI4.41至104.37),普罗帕酮(RR:7.15,95%CI1.27至40.10),多非利特(RR:6.43,95%CI1.38至29.91),和索他洛尔(RR:6.39,95%CI1.03至39.78)可能导致出院或研究随访结束时窦性心律的维持大幅增加(证据确定性:中度),和普鲁卡因胺(RR:4.29,95%CI0.63至29.03),氟卡尼(RR3.57,95%CI0.24~52.30)和vernakalant(RR:1.18,95%CI0.05~27.37)可能导致出院或研究结束时窦性心律维持率大幅增加(证据确定性:低).所有测试过的房扑电复律策略均具有非常高的疗效(97.9%至100%)。30天的死亡率(14例死亡)和卒中或全身性栓塞(3例)极低。关于生活质量的数据很少,临床意义不确定。没有关于心力衰竭再入院的信息。住院时间的数据很少,低质量,并且无法汇集。
    结论:尽管证据质量低,本系统综述提供了有关电学和药理学策略的重要信息,以帮助患者和医师应对房颤和房扑.在评估患者合并症时,抗心律失常药物的起效和副作用与需要有镇静经验的医生相比,或麻醉支持电复律是选择复律方法时的关键方面。
    Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent sustained arrhythmia. Cardioversion is a rhythm control strategy to restore normal/sinus rhythm, and can be achieved through drugs (pharmacological) or a synchronised electric shock (electrical cardioversion).
    To assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter and atrial tachycardias.
    We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S) and three trials registers (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP and ISRCTN) on 14 February 2023.
    We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) at the individual patient level. Patient populations were aged ≥ 18 years with AF of any type and duration, atrial flutter or other sustained related atrial arrhythmias, not occurring as a result of reversible causes.
    We used standard Cochrane methodology to collect data and performed a network meta-analysis using the standard frequentist graph-theoretical approach using the netmeta package in R. We used GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence which we presented in our summary of findings with a judgement on certainty. We calculated differences using risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) as well as ranking treatments using a P value. We assessed clinical and statistical heterogeneity and split the networks for the primary outcome and acute procedural success, due to concerns about violating the transitivity assumption.
    We included 112 RCTs (139 records), from which we pooled data from 15,968 patients. The average age ranged from 47 to 72 years and the proportion of male patients ranged from 38% to 92%. Seventy-nine trials were considered to be at high risk of bias for at least one domain, 32 had no high risk of bias domains, but had at least one domain classified as uncertain risk, and one study was considered at low risk for all domains. For paroxysmal AF (35 trials), when compared to placebo, anteroapical (AA)/anteroposterior (AP) biphasic truncated exponential waveform (BTE) cardioversion (RR: 2.42; 95% CI 1.65 to 3.56), quinidine (RR: 2.23; 95% CI 1.49 to 3.34), ibutilide (RR: 2.00; 95% CI 1.28 to 3.12), propafenone (RR: 1.98; 95% CI 1.67 to 2.34), amiodarone (RR: 1.69; 95% CI 1.42 to 2.02), sotalol (RR: 1.58; 95% CI 1.08 to 2.31) and procainamide (RR: 1.49; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.97) likely result in a large increase in maintenance of sinus rhythm until hospital discharge or end of study follow-up (certainty of evidence: moderate). The effect size was larger for AA/AP incremental and was progressively smaller for the subsequent interventions. Despite low certainty of evidence, antazoline may result in a large increase (RR: 28.60; 95% CI 1.77 to 461.30) in this outcome. Similarly, low-certainty evidence suggests a large increase in this outcome for flecainide (RR: 2.17; 95% CI 1.68 to 2.79), vernakalant (RR: 2.13; 95% CI 1.52 to 2.99), and magnesium (RR: 1.73; 95% CI 0.79 to 3.79). For persistent AF (26 trials), one network was created for electrical cardioversion and showed that, when compared to AP BTE incremental energy with patches, AP BTE maximum energy with patches (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.55) likely results in a large increase, and active compression AP BTE incremental energy with patches (RR: 1.14, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.131) likely results in an increase in maintenance of sinus rhythm at hospital discharge or end of study follow-up (certainty of evidence: high). Use of AP BTE incremental with paddles (RR: 1.03, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.09; certainty of evidence: low) may lead to a slight increase, and AP MDS Incremental paddles (RR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.05; certainty of evidence: low) may lead to a slight decrease in efficacy. On the other hand, AP MDS incremental energy using patches (RR: 0.78, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.87), AA RBW incremental energy with patches (RR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.88), AP RBW incremental energy with patches (RR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.86), AA MDS incremental energy with patches (RR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.86) and AA MDS incremental energy with paddles (RR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.83) probably result in a decrease in this outcome when compared to AP BTE incremental energy with patches (certainty of evidence: moderate). The network for pharmacological cardioversion showed that bepridil (RR: 2.29, 95% CI 1.26 to 4.17) and quindine (RR: 1.53, (95% CI 1.01 to 2.32) probably result in a large increase in maintenance of sinus rhythm at hospital discharge or end of study follow-up when compared to amiodarone (certainty of evidence: moderate). Dofetilide (RR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.44), sotalol (RR: 0.89, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.18), propafenone (RR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.25) and pilsicainide (RR: 0.39, 95% CI 0.02 to 7.01) may result in a reduction in this outcome when compared to amiodarone, but the certainty of evidence is low. For atrial flutter (14 trials), a network could be created only for antiarrhythmic drugs. Using placebo as the common comparator, ibutilide (RR: 21.45, 95% CI 4.41 to 104.37), propafenone (RR: 7.15, 95% CI 1.27 to 40.10), dofetilide (RR: 6.43, 95% CI 1.38 to 29.91), and sotalol (RR: 6.39, 95% CI 1.03 to 39.78) probably result in a large increase in the maintenance of sinus rhythm at hospital discharge or end of study follow-up (certainty of evidence: moderate), and procainamide (RR: 4.29, 95% CI 0.63 to 29.03), flecainide (RR 3.57, 95% CI 0.24 to 52.30) and vernakalant (RR: 1.18, 95% CI 0.05 to 27.37) may result in a large increase in maintenance of sinus rhythm at hospital discharge or end of study follow-up (certainty of evidence: low). All tested electrical cardioversion strategies for atrial flutter had very high efficacy (97.9% to 100%). The rate of mortality (14 deaths) and stroke or systemic embolism (3 events) at 30 days was extremely low. Data on quality of life were scarce and of uncertain clinical significance. No information was available regarding heart failure readmissions. Data on duration of hospitalisation was scarce, of low quality, and could not be pooled.
    Despite the low quality of evidence, this systematic review provides important information on electrical and pharmacological strategies to help patients and physicians deal with AF and atrial flutter. In the assessment of the patient comorbidity profile, antiarrhythmic drug onset of action and side effect profile versus the need for a physician with experience in sedation, or anaesthetics support for electrical cardioversion are key aspects when choosing the cardioversion method.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号