This article reports a case study of a middle-aged patient diagnosed with Ketosis-Prone Diabetes (KPD) and diabetic ketoacidosis who had a mobile thrombus in the distal aortic arch with catastrophic complications from thrombus embolization. The pathogenesis of the mobile aortic thrombus is currently under investigation, with many risk factors having been found. Based on the patient\'s limited manifestation of atherosclerosis and the absence of any indications of thrombophilia, KPD and inflammation from uncontrolled hyperglycemia likely played a significant role in the formation of the thrombus. KPD is a subtype of diabetes characterized by the abrupt onset of severe hyperglycemia and ketoacidosis. The inflammation caused by uncontrolled hyperglycemia in KPD patients can lead to endothelial dysfunction and the activation of prothrombotic pathways. There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal approach for managing a mobile aortic thrombus. The main strategies under consideration are conservative care, including anticoagulation alone, invasive removal of the thrombus, or endovascular intervention.

Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a medical and surgical emergency, and the mainstays of treatment are therapeutic anticoagulation and surgery. These interventions require adequate platelet count and functionality. Anticoagulation and surgery can be complicated in thrombocytopenic patients and require interdisciplinary management for optimal outcomes, as literature is limited in this population. We present a case of a patient with severe thrombocytopenia who developed limb ischemia from cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). We propose a management strategy for anticoagulation and perioperative platelet transfusion, with successful revascularization without adverse bleeding events. While successful, more data is required to investigate long-term outcomes.

Multiple interventions, including catheter-directed therapy (CDT), systemic thrombolysis (ST), surgical embolectomy (SE), and therapeutic anticoagulation (AC) have been used to treat intermediate to high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE), but the most effective and safest treatment remains unclear. Our study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety outcomes of each intervention.
We queried PubMed and EMBASE in January 2023 and performed a network meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT), including high or intermediate-risk PE patients, and comparing AC, CDT, SE, and ST. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and major bleeding. The secondary outcomes included long-term mortality (≥6 months), recurrent PE, minor bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage.
We identified 11 RCTs and 42 observational studies involving 157,454 patients. CDT was associated with lower in-hospital mortality than ST (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.41 [0.31-0.55]), AC (OR [95% CI]: 0.33 [0.20-0.53]), and SE (OR [95% CI]: 0.61 [0.39-0.96]). Recurrent PE in CDT was lower than ST (OR [95% CI]: 0.66 [0.50-0.87]), AC (OR [95% CI]: 0.36 [0.20-0.66]), and trended lower than SE (OR [95% CI]: 0.71 [0.40-1.26]). Notably, ST had higher major bleeding risks than CDT (OR [95% CI]: 1.51 [1.19-1.91]) and AC (OR [95% CI]: 2.21 [1.53-3.19]). By rankogram analysis, CDT presented the highest p-score in in-hospital mortality, long-term mortality, and recurrent PE.
In this network meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs involving patients with intermediate to high-risk PE, CDT was associated with improved mortality outcomes compared to other therapies, without significant additional bleeding risk.

Heart failure results in significant morbidity and mortality. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HfrEF) in the absence of atrial fibrillation has been increasingly considered an independent risk factor for ischemic stroke, partly because of the development of left ventricular thrombus and subsequent cardioembolic stroke and partly because of hemodynamic impairment. Here, we present a case of a 60-year-old male with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, who presented with cardioembolic ischemic stroke. In the investigation to localize the source, he was found to have slow intra-ventricular blood flow, which over shorter periods of follow up lead to the development of left ventricle intra-mural thrombi. Meanwhile, the patient also developed hemorrhagic conversion in the ischemic stroke, which further complicated the choice of anticoagulation. To date, no consensus has been developed on the choice of anticoagulation and clinical criteria for the use of anticoagulation in patients having HfrEF and sinus rhythm. This case brings forth a need for further research on whether anticoagulation would be beneficial in patients with HfrEF and sinus rhythm.

The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) affects all three branches of Virchow\'s triad. It increases the risk of thrombosis and thromboembolic events. Pulmonary embolism and stroke are most commonly reported. However, there is an increasing number of cases demonstrating thrombosis in otherwise uncommon anatomical areas. In this presentation, we will explore the potential causes of pulmonary vein thrombosis secondary to COVID-19.

UNASSIGNED: Compartment syndrome is a well-known surgical emergency caused by increasing pressure inside the fascial or osteo-fascial compartment, resulting in vascular compromise, ischemia, and necrosis. This condition usually occurs following a traumatic incident. Here we present a report of nontraumatic acute compartment syndrome caused by systemic anticoagulation in patients presenting with the acute coronary syndrome.
UNASSIGNED: We report a case of a 51-year-old male with acute coronary syndrome receiving systemic anticoagulation, which later developed significant swelling and tensing on his right arm. He also complained of pallor and paresthesia with decreased peripheral oxygen saturation on his right arm.
UNASSIGNED: The patient was diagnosed with atraumatic acute compartment syndrome and underwent fasciotomy promptly. His symptoms improved after undergoing fasciotomy.
UNASSIGNED: Atraumatic acute compartment syndrome is a rare case. Identifying this condition without a typical history of underlying predisposition is important to avoid delaying emergent surgery as the key therapy.

Venous thromboembolism may be the primary presentation in patients with polycythaemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia. Most patients get diagnosed with polycythaemia vera after presenting with venous or arterial thromboembolism in the first place. Most patients tend to develop thrombosis just before or at the time of diagnosis, and this risk decreases over time. Patients aged >60 years with a history of previous thrombosis, elevated haematocrit, and leukocytosis are most at risk of thrombosis. We report a case of a 74-year-old patient presenting with shortness of breath for three days. A computerized tomography pulmonary angiogram showed bilateral pulmonary emboli with right heart strain. He underwent emergency EkoSonic™ endovascular system-directed thrombolysis (EKOS™, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA). The patient tested positive for the Janus kinase 2 gene mutation (JAK2), met two major and one minor criterion for PV, and was discharged home on oral anticoagulation. The Janus kinase 2 (JAK2V617F) mutation is quite common in patients with polycythaemia vera, thrombocythemia, and myelofibrosis, and these patients are at risk of both arterial and venous thrombosis, hence they require long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Clotting is a major drawback of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) performed on critically ill pediatric patients. Although anticoagulation is recommended to prevent clotting, limited results are available on the effect of each pharmacological strategy in reducing filter clotting in pediatric CRRT. This study defines which anticoagulation strategy, between regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) and systemic anticoagulation with heparin, is safer and more efficient in reducing clotting, patient mortality, and treatment complications during pediatric CRRT.
METHODS: A systematic literature review was run considering papers published in English until December 2021 and describing patients\' and treatments\' complications in CRRT performed with heparin and RCA on patients aged less than 18 years.
RESULTS: Eleven studies were considered, cumulatively comprising 1.706 CRRT sessions (62% with systemic anticoagulation and 38% with RCA). Studies have consistently identified RCA\'s superiority over systemic anticoagulation with heparin in prolonging circuit life. The pooled estimate (95% CI) of filter clotting risk showed that RCA is a protective factor for clotting risk (RR = 0.204).
CONCLUSIONS: RCA has a potential role in prolonging circuit life and seems superior to systemic anticoagulation with heparin in decreasing the risk of circuit clotting during CRRT performed in critically ill pediatric patients.

Necrotizing pancreatitis is an inflammatory process that poses a strong risk of systemic venous thromboembolism. However, it is often challenging to opt for systemic anticoagulation since the disease is also associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage. Given these opposing complications, a risk versus benefit analysis has to be employed in the management of necrotizing pancreatitis on a case-by-case basis. We discuss a case where the team was faced with a dilemma regarding anticoagulation in a patient with newly developed atrial fibrillation in the setting of necrotizing pancreatitis. We found that there is a lack of guidelines that address the time of initiation and the type of systemic anticoagulation that should be administered in such patients.

Background Studies suggest that COVID-19 infection may induce increased hypercoagulability, leading to thrombotic complications. The high rates of thrombotic complications among patients receiving standard-dose deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis have prompted some clinicians to support the empiric increase of anticoagulation (AC) doses used for prophylaxis in patients with COVID-19. At present, the optimal anticoagulant agents, dosages, and duration have not been designated. We conducted a retrospective study to assess for outcomes in patients who received treatment for COVID-19 based on various dosings of AC. Methods This was a single-institution, retrospective cross-sectional study including patients with a positive COVID-19 test who were admitted within the St. Joseph\'s Health Network from September to November of 2020. The inclusion criteria were men and women aged 18 years or older who had confirmed COVID-19 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Medical charts of patients who met the inclusion criteria were audited to obtain information. The patients were separated into three cohorts: those who received DVT prophylactic dose of AC, those who received an intermediate dose of AC, and those who received therapeutic AC. Results A total of 440 patients were included in the study, of whom 236 were Hispanic (50.3%), 131 were Caucasian (27.1%), 47 were African American (10.7%), and 26 were Asian (5.9%). The most common comorbidities were hypertension (273/440 [62.2%]), diabetes 189/440 [43.1%]), and coronary artery disease (60/440 [13.7%]). In the DVT prophylactic dose of AC cohort, there were 215 patients, and the average length of stay was 10.3 days. Eleven patients experienced bleeding events, five patients experienced thrombotic events, 16 patients required mechanical ventilation, and 20 patients died. In the intermediate dose of AC cohort, there were 63 patients, and the average length of stay was 10.3 days. Three patients experienced bleeding events, two patients experienced thrombotic events, seven patients required mechanical invasive ventilation, and 11 patients died. In the therapeutic dose of AC cohort, there were 162 patients, and the average length of stay was 14 days. In this cohort, 19 patients experienced bleeding events, 12 patients experienced thrombotic events, 26 patients required invasive mechanical ventilation, and 29 patients died. Patients who received intermediate dosing of AC also had the lowest risk of thrombotic events (0.05). Patients who received intermediate dosing of AC had the lowest rates of requiring both high-flow nasal cannula (p = 0.0001) and invasive mechanical ventilation (p = 0.031). Patients who received intermediate dosing of AC had a lower rate of bleeding compared to those who received the DVT prophylaxis dose and systemic AC dose (p = 0.037). The DVT prophylactic and intermediate dosing of AC groups had a shorter length of stay in comparison to the systemic AC group (p = 0.0002). Conclusion In comparison to the venous thromboembolism prophylaxis dose and systemic AC dose groups, intermediate dosing of AC had the lowest rates of hemorrhage, mortality, length of stay, and requirement of high-flow nasal cannula or mechanical invasive ventilation. In the systemic dose AC group, there were worse clinical outcomes in terms of length of stay, incidence of bleeding events, requirement of mechanical ventilator use, and rate of mortality.