Objectives: This study compared long-term surgical outcomes of the scleral flap versus scleral pocket technique for sutureless intrascleral one-piece intraocular lens (IOL) fixation. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted at a single center, involving consecutive patients undergoing sutureless intrascleral one-piece IOL implantation, between January 2020 and May 2022. Eyes were divided into two groups based on the surgical technique: group 1 underwent scleral flap (n = 64), and group 2 received scleral pocket technique (n = 59). Visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and complications were assessed over a minimum 24-month follow-up period. Results: Both groups showed improvements in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), increasing from 0.84 ± 0.56 logMAR at baseline to 0.39 ± 0.23 logMAR (p = 0.042) at 24 months in group 1 and from 0.91 ± 0.63 logMAR at baseline to 0.45 ± 0.38 logMAR (p = 0.039) at 24 months in group 2. No significant differences in BCVA were observed between the groups at baseline (p = 0.991), 12 (p = 0.496) and 24 months (p = 0.557). Mean spherical equivalent (-0.73 ± 1.32 D in group 1 and -0.92 ± 0.99 D in group 2, p = 0.447), refractive prediction error (-0.21 ± 1.1 D in group 1 and -0.35 ± 1.8 D in group 2, p = 0.377), and surgically induced astigmatism (0.74 ± 0.89 D in group 1 and 0.85 ± 0.76 in group 2, p = 0.651) were comparable between the two groups. An IOL tilt of 5.5 ± 1.8 and 5.8 ± 2.0 degrees (p = 0.867) and an IOL decentration of 0.41 ± 0.21 mm and 0.29 ± 0.11 mm (p = 0.955) were obtained, respectively, in group 1 and group 2 at 24 months. Mean endothelial cell density remained stable at 24 months in both groups (p = 0.832 in group 1 and p = 0.443 in group 2), and it was 1747.20 ± 588.03 cells/mm2 in group 1 and 1883.71 ± 621.29 cells/mm2 in group 2 (p = 0.327) at baseline, 1545.36 ± 442.3 cells/mm2 in group 1 and 1417.44 ± 623.40 cells/mm2 in group 2 (p = 0.483) at 24 months. No cases of endophthalmitis were observed. Conclusions: The scleral pocket technique for sutureless intrascleral one-piece IOL fixation is comparable to the traditional scleral flap technique in terms of long-term visual outcomes and safety. The scleral pocket technique offers a simplified approach and a viable option even for less experienced surgeons.

BACKGROUND: A novel technique is described employing scleral grooves to facilitate sutureless scleral fixation of the Carlevale intraocular lens (CIL). We describe its use in a series of 47 patients with aphakia.
METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients with aphakia who underwent CIL implantation with the new technique by a single surgeon during 1 year. The novelty of this technique consists in the creation of two partial-thickness linear sclerotomies (grooves), 180° apart, 2 mm from and parallel to the limbus. In the middle of each groove a full-thickness sclerotomy is performed to facilitate externalization of the CIL anchors. The groove allows the anchor to plug the full-thickness sclerotomy and to rest within the sclera without protrusion. Reported outcomes include pre-operative/post-operative visual acuity, post-operative spherical equivalent and surgical complications. Follow-up was a minimum of 6 months.
RESULTS: Forty-eight eyes of 47 patients with aphakia with a mean age of 74 years (range 31-90 years) are included. The commonest causes of aphakia were intraocular lens (IOL) subluxation,with or without exfoliation (54.2%), complicated cataract surgery (29.2%), crystalline lens luxation (6.3%) and trauma (4.1%). All CILs inserted with the new technique stayed successfully in situ during follow-up. Median pre-operative best-corrected visual acuity (0.75 logMAR; range 0.1-2.7) significantly improved to 0.5 logMAR post-operatively (p < 0.001). Moreover, 78% and 65% of the operated cases were within 1.0 and 0.5 diopters, respectively, from intended refraction. The most common complications were transient cystoid macular oedema (8.3%) and transient intraocular pressure rise (8.3%), all of which resolved within 2 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed modification of sutureless scleral fixation of the CIL appears safe and effective. In our experience it is less time consuming and easier to perform than previous techniques and may therefore offer a useful future option.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of anterior segment parameters using the Scheimpflug corneal topography 1 year after surgery in patients who underwent sutureless scleral fixation intraocular lens (SFIOL) implantation using the modified Yamane technique and retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lens (RPIOL) implantation.
METHODS: A total of 60 eyes from 57 patients who underwent sutureless SFIOL implantation and 57 eyes from 52 patients who underwent RPIOL implantation were included. Anterior chamber depth (ACD), anterior chamber angle (ACA), anterior chamber volume (ACV), anterior-posterior corneal astigmatism, and keratometric values were assessed using the Scheimpflug corneal topography (Pentacam HR, Germany).
RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative UCVA and BCVA between the sutureless SFIOL and the RPIOL group (p = 0.236, p = 0.293, respectively). While there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative IOP between the two groups (p = 0.223), a statistically significant decrease in IOP was observed in both groups (p < 0.001). While there was no statistical difference between the sutureless SFIOL group and the RPIOL group in terms of spherical value (p = 0.441) and spherical equivalence (p = 0.237), there was a statistically significant difference in cylindrical value (p < 0.001). While there was a statistical difference in anterior astigmatism (p < 0.001), there was no statistical difference in posterior astigmatism (p = 0.405). There was no statistical difference in terms of ACV, ACD, and ACA between the sutureless SFIOL and the RPIOL group (p = 0.812, p = 0.770, p = 0.401, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, although there was a statistical difference in cylindrical value and anterior corneal astigmatism between the sutureless SFIOL and RPIOL groups, vision was not affected. According to this study, sutureless SFIOL and RPIOL are two successful methods in terms of visual acuity, anterior segment, and keratometry outcomes in aphakic patients after phacoemulsification.

UNASSIGNED: Iris-claw intraocular lens (IC-IOL) implantation and sutureless scleral fixation of intraocular lenses (SSF-IOL) are two commonly preferred surgical approaches for the management of aphakic patients without sufficient capsular support. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of IC-IOL implantation and trocar-assisted SSF-IOL implantation.
UNASSIGNED: The medical records of secondary IOL implantation patients were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had a detailed ophthalmological examination, including LogMAR best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and endothelial cell density (ECD) preoperatively and postoperatively. SPSS 21.0 software was used for the statistical analysis.
UNASSIGNED: There were 15 patients in the IC-IOL group and 12 patients in the SSF-IOL group. Age and gender distributions were similar between the groups (p=0.456 and p=0.398, respectively). Similarly, patients in both groups had similar CDVA preoperatively and postoperatively (p=0.51, p=0.48, respectively). Both IC-IOL and SSF-IOL implantation significantly increased CDVA (p=0.001 and p=0.005, respectively). IOP remained unchanged in both groups. However, ECD reduced significantly following both IC-IOL and SSF-IOL implantation (p=0.001 and p=0.005, respectively) and trocar-assisted SSF-IOL implantation resulted in significantly more endothelial loss compared to IC-IOL implantation (439.5±89 vs. 164.4±53, p=0.013).
UNASSIGNED: Both surgical approaches increased CDVA significantly and at similar levels. However, trocar-assisted SSF-IOL implantation resulted in significantly more endothelial loss compared to IC-IOL implantation. None of the patients developed bullous keratopathy, but this difference should be kept in mind, especially in patients with critically low ECD.

BACKGROUND:  Complicated cataract surgery is the main cause of secondary lens implantation surgery. Several approaches have been introduced to face those circumstances. As it concerns scleral-fixated IOLs for the posterior chamber, many types of IOL can be implanted. The aim of article is to review the single piece sutureless scleral fixation Carlevale lens; Methods: Narrative review; Results: Several works described as safe the IOL implantation utilizing the handshake approach, without tactile manipulation, which allows for self-centration and lens firm fixation in uncomplicated surgery. This allows to reduce high order aberration such as astigmatism and coma, with a very good postoperative BCVA Conclusions: Carlevale lens is one of the best option to manage insufficient capsular support.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of posterior iris-claw lens and scleral-fixated posterior chamber lens for aphakia after traumatic posterior dislocation of the crystalline lens.
METHODS: Out of 120 evaluated cases, 60 were randomly assigned in each group. A 23G vitrectomy was done and intraocular lens was implanted by two different techniques. Extensive preoperative and postoperative evaluation was performed including optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging. Follow-up was done on days 1, 7, and 28 at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
RESULTS: A significant improvement was found in uncorrected visual acuity in both the groups. Surgical time in iris fixation was significantly less (P < 0.001), whereas pupil peaking and pigment release were more. Difference in mean intraocular pressure and change in astigmatism in both the groups were insignificant.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the techniques had similar good visual results. Although operating time was shorter for iris fixation, it had several disadvantages, including immediate postoperative inflammation and ovalling of the pupil. However, scleral fixation had a better outcome in terms of postoperative complications.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate anterior segment parameters in patients undergoing sutureless scleral fixation intraocular lens implantation with the modified Yamane technique (SSF-IOL-MY) by using Scheimpflug camera system.
METHODS: Each group of 25 patients was included for aphakia undergoing SSF-IOL-MY and for senile cataract undergoing uneventful phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation (Phaco+IOL). Anterior chamber depth (ACD), iridocorneal angle (ICA), anterior chamber volume (ACV) and keratometric values were evaluated by Scheimpflug camera (Sirius, CSO, Italy) system.
RESULTS: It was seen that the ACD, ICA and ACV display wider structures in patients with SSF-IOL-MY group compared to Phaco+IOL group. However, the ACD (p = 0.828) and ICA (p = 0.219) have not a statistically significant difference, while ACV (p = 0.007) has a statistically significant difference. In terms of keratometric values of the patients, there was no statistically difference in K1, K2 and Kmax values (p = 0.348, p = 0.106, p =0.269, respectively). Although there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of anterior corneal astigmatism, posterior corneal astigmatism was statistically higher in the Phaco+IOL group (p = 0.192, p = 0.031, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: SSF-IOL-MY surgery affects anterior segment parameters similar to the Phaco+IOL method, which is the gold standard in cataract surgery. In this surgery, it was approached to the gold standard method in terms of IOL position with the ACD, ACV and ICA values and the results of the corneal incision with the keratometric values.

OBJECTIVE: Intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with a trocar-assisted sutureless scleral fixation technique is a relatively new IOL implantation approach for aphakic eyes. During this surgery, the intrascleral position of the haptics can change the location of the IOL optic and may alter the refractive outcome. This study aimed to evaluate the refractive outcome of this surgery.
METHODS: The files of 22 patients who had undergone IOL implantation with the trocar-assisted sutureless scleral fixation technique were retrospectively reviewed, and the patients were invited for final examination. IOL power was calculated with optical biometry (Lenstar LS900). IOL power calculations were performed according to formulas designed for in-the-bag IOL implantation. The final refractive error was determined with an autorefractometer (Topcon KR-1/RM-1).
RESULTS: This study included 14 patients (8 male, 6 female, mean age: 62.7 ± 18.7). There were no significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative corneal astigmatism values (p = 0.16). There were also no significant differences between the postoperative corneal and total astigmatism values (p = 0.44), confirming the absence of significant IOL tilt. The difference between the implanted IOLs and the calculated IOL power for emmetropia was 0.09 D ± 0.49 D (p = 0.52). Although emmetropia was targeted, the refractive outcome shifted to hyperopia (+ 0.85 D ± 1.15 D) and was significantly different from the refractive status calculated with optical biometry (p = 0.034).
CONCLUSIONS: The intrascleral fixation of IOLs results in increased posterior positioning of the IOL optic and can induce approximately 0.85 D of hyperopia if proper adjustments are not performed during IOL power calculations.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the sutureless scleral fixation technique for posterior chamber foldable intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation in aphakic eyes with insufficient or no capsular support.
METHODS: A technique for sutureless intrascleral fixation of the haptics of a standard 3-piece PCIOL was used which ensures sutureless fixation by permanent incarceration of the haptics in a scleral tunnel parallel to the limbus. All patients were evaluated for preoperative status [visual acuity, refractive error, K readings, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, slit lamp examination, fundus examination and optical biometry], postoperative status and complications. Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) was done for 10 cases to evaluate optic tilt.
RESULTS: The study evaluated 42 eyes of 42 patients. The follow-up period was 6mo. Improvement of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) one line occurred in 10 cases (23.8%) and loss of one line in 3 cases (7.1%). Intraoperative complications included: haptic kink in 4 cases (9.5%), haptic breakage in 1 case (2.4%), haptic dislocation in 1 case (2.4%), haptic slippage in 3 cases (7.1%), IOL dislocation in 1 case (2.4%) and sclerotomy related bleeding in 1 case (2.4%). Postoperative complications included: transient mild vitreous hemorrhage in 3 cases (7.1%), choroidal detachment in 1 case (2.4%), cystoid macular edema (CME) in 1 case (2.4%), optic capture in 1 case (2.4%), subconjunctival haptic in 2 cases (4.8%), ocular hypotony in 4 cases (9.5%) and ocular hypertension in 1 case (2.4%). There were no cases of retinal detachment or endophthalmitis. UBM showed optic tilt in 3 cases (30%).
CONCLUSIONS: Fixation of three-piece foldable IOL haptics in scleral tunnel parallel to the limbus-provided axial stability and proper centration of the IOL with minimal or no tilt in most cases and a low complication rate during the follow up period which lasted 6mo.

OBJECTIVE: To compare results of sutureless transscleral intraocular lens (IOL) fixation to retropupillary iris-claw lens implantation in cases of paediatric aphakia without capsular support.
METHODS: Thirty eyes of children with insufficient capsular support for IOL implantation were randomized to undergo sutureless transscleral IOL fixation or iris-claw lens fixation. The primary outcome was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Secondary outcomes included operative time, astigmatism, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell count (ECC), IOL decentration and tilt, central foveal thickness and complications.
RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in BCVA at all follow-up visits, with no significant difference between both groups. 53.3% in the transscleral-fixated IOL group and 80% in the iris-claw IOL group had a final BCVA ≥0.3. The operative time was significantly shorter in the iris-claw IOL group (p = 0.001). IOL decentration and tilt were higher in the transscleral-fixated IOL group, but the difference was not significant. The ECC was reduced by 14.6% in the transscleral-fixated IOL group and 11% in the iris-claw group at 6 months, with no significant difference between both groups (p = 0.5). In the transscleral-fixated IOL group, two eyes developed ocular hypertension and two eyes had IOL decentration, while in the iris-claw IOL group, 1 eye developed glaucoma, three eyes had haptic disenclavation, and one eye had retinal detachment.
CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques yielded a comparable visual outcome. Retropupillary iris-claw lens fixation is a shorter procedure and technically easier than sutureless transscleral fixation, but the risk of disenclavation should be considered especially in younger age groups. Scleral fixation is the only option in case of severe iris damage, but may be associated with more endothelial cell loss.