OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study investigated the impact of corneal parameters on surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) in eyes with prior myopic correction undergoing cataract surgery.
METHODS: Department of Ophthalmology, San Marino Hospital, San Marino, Republic of San Marino.
METHODS: This case-control study analyzed existing data retrospectively, without randomization or masking.
METHODS: Eighty eyes divided in group 1 (40 eyes previous underwent refractive surgery for myopia) and group 2 ( 40 myopic eyes) that underwent cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation were included. SIA was calculated using values from the IOL Master Zeiss 700 and mean pupil power (MPP) derived from the CSO Sirius Topographer (based on 3 mm pupil size) with vectorial analysis from doctor Hill software.
RESULTS: No significant difference in SIA was observed between eyes with prior myopic photorefractive keratectomy and the control group (p > 0.05). SIA calculations using the IOL Master and CSO Sirius Tomographer yielded similar results. There was no significant correlation between SIA and axial length, corneal curvature, peripheral corneal thickness, or anterior chamber depth (p > 0.05). However, an inverse correlation was found between SIA and horizontal corneal diameter (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Corneal parameters, such as axial length, corneal curvature, peripheral corneal thickness, and anterior chamber depth, showed no significant influence on SIA. The inverse correlation between SIA and horizontal corneal diameter in study group suggests potential influence of white-to-white distance on SIA. These findings highlight the importance of considering corneal parameters for optimizing surgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate refractive outcomes and corneal astigmatism changes after Toric implantable collamer lens with a central port (V4c T-ICL) implantation over 1y of follow-up.
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed including 50 eyes of 50 patients that underwent V4c T-ICL implantation. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, refraction, refractive and corneal astigmatism changes and corneal coupling correction were evaluated preoperatively, 1 and 12mo postoperatively. Vector analysis was used for astigmatism changes. Coefficient of adjustment (CAdj) was calculated for corneal coupling analysis.
RESULTS: The mean UDVA achieved was 0.03 logMAR at 1mo and remained unchanged throughout the whole follow-up (P=0.193). At the last visit, 84% of the eyes achieved a CDVA of 0.00 logMAR or better. Regarding spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ), 96% of eyes were ranges of ±1.00 D and 84% of them within ±0.50 D. Also, 94% of eyes had a remaining refractive cylinder within ±1.00 D and 78% of them within ±0.50 D. Both, SEQ and refractive cylinder, remain stable over the postoperative follow-up (P=1.000 and P=0.660, respectively). In terms of surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), no statistically significant differences were found over the follow-up (P=0.102) and under correction was found with a correction index lower than the unit at each visit. A keratometric astigmatism induced of 0.59±0.53 (vector mean: 0.26×73°) D was reached at the last visit. No significant changes in terms of corneal astigmatism orientation were reported over post-surgery visits (P=0.129 and P=0.097 at 1 and 12mo respectively). No clinical significance was found for CAdj on with-the-rule astigmatism. No postoperative complications resulting from the surgery were found.
CONCLUSIONS: Refractive outcomes suggest that the V4c T-ICL implantation for correction of myopic astigmatism was satisfactory in terms of effectiveness, safety, and stability during 1y of follow-up. Corneal astigmatism induced by the incision around 0.5 D is achieved according to the remaining refractive cylinder found at one-year post-surgery. Corneal coupling analysis results in no unexpected spherical change.

BACKGROUND: To comparatively analyze the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) of the anterior, posterior, and total corneas of eyes undertaking implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation with temporal or superior corneal incisions.
METHODS: One hundred and nine eyes of 109 patients who received ICL implantation were recruited: 40 eyes had temporal incisions and 69 eyes had superior incisions. Total corneal refractive power (TCRP); simulated keratometry of the anterior (Sim-KAnt) and posterior (Sim-KPost) corneal curvature; and astigmatism of the anterior (CAAnt), posterior (CAPost), and total (CATCRP) cornea were recorded through a Pentacam preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. The SIA of the anterior, posterior, and total cornea were also compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: There were no significant intergroup differences for TCRP, Sim-KAnt, Sim-KPost, CAAnt, CAPost, or CATCRP, preoperatively. However, values of CAAnt, CAPost, and CATCRP with temporal incision were significantly higher than those parameters with superior incision postoperatively. All of the SIA of the anterior, posterior, and total cornea were significantly lower for temporal incision than those with a superior incision (p < 0.001, p = 0.006 and p = 0.001 respectively). Meanwhile, the superior incisions created against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism, and temporal incisions always induce with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism in total cornea.
CONCLUSIONS: A superior incision may be suitable for correcting WTR astigmatism, while a temporal incision for correcting ATR astigmatism when using a non-toric ICL. Meanwhile, temporal incision could be a better choice with little preoperative astigmatism or that preoperative astigmatism would be corrected with toric ICLs.
BACKGROUND: Registration number: ChiCTR2100051739. Prospectively registered: 01 October 2021.

UNASSIGNED: To evaluate and compare the effect of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery on corneal astigmatism in post-LASIK eyes and virgin eyes.
UNASSIGNED: Patients who underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery were included in the study and categorized into two groups: Group A, consisting of patients with post-LASIK eyes, and Group B, consisting of patients with virgin eyes. Visual acuity, corneal astigmatism, and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) were evaluated. Additionally, the correlation between SIA and preoperative corneal astigmatism, mean corneal curvature, and central corneal thickness was also analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 168 eyes were enrolled in this study, with 62 eyes in Group A and 106 eyes in Group B. Significant differences in corneal astigmatism and SIA were observed between the two groups in the early postoperative period following cataract surgery (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference at 6 months postoperatively (P>0.05). Corneal astigmatism demonstrated an against-The-rule shift in both groups postoperatively. No significant correlation was identified between SIA and preoperative corneal astigmatism, corneal curvature or corneal thickness. Additionally, there was no significant difference observed between the two groups in terms of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at 6 months postoperatively.
UNASSIGNED: The effect of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery on corneal astigmatism in post-LASIK eyes and virgin eyes was different in the early postoperative period. However, there was no significant difference at 6 months postoperatively. The post-LASIK eyes exhibited a delayed recovery compared to the virgin eyes.

UNASSIGNED: To assess long term changes of the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after 2.2 mm clear corneal incisions (CCIs) in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and compare them between 2 types of CCIs: temporal and superior approach.
UNASSIGNED: Patients received the temporal CCIs (Group A) or the superior CCIs (Group B). Outcome measures included visual acuity, manifest refraction, corneal astigmatism, SIA, flattening effect, and corneal HOAs. Correlation between postoperative corneal HOA and SIA at each follow-up were analysed.
UNASSIGNED: This study assessed data from 106 eyes, of which 64 in Group A and 42 in Group B. The two groups had similar postoperative visual acuity of distance, intermediate and near (all P > 0.05). SIA and corneal HOAs were significantly lower in Group A than Group B in the early postoperative period, while there was no significant difference in the late postoperative period. At 6 months after surgery, the arithmetic mean of SIA over corneal 4mm zone was 0.33 ± 0.19D for temporal incision, and 0.37 ± 0.25D for superior incision. For Group A, the correlations of HOAs and SIA persisted from 1 week to 6 months after surgery. For Group B, the changes in corneal HOAs were significantly related to the SIA at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively.
UNASSIGNED: This study suggested the consistency of increasing and recovering process of corneal HOAs and SIA after surgery. Compared to the superior incisions, temporal incisions might induce quicker corneal recovery and less change in SIA and corneal HOAs.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the corneal high-order aberrations and surgically induced astigmatism between the clear corneal incision and limbus tunnel incision for posterior chamber implantable collamer lens (ICL/TICL) implantation.
METHODS: A total of 127 eyes from 73 myopic patients underwent ICL V4c implantation, with 70 eyes receiving clear corneal incisions and 57 eyes receiving limbus tunnel incisions. The anterior and back corneal surfaces were measured and the Root Mean Square of all activated aberrations (TRMS) was calculated, including higher-order aberration (HOA RMS), spherical aberration Z40, coma coefficients (Coma RMS) Z3-1 Z31, and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA). The measurements were taken preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, and 6 months. In this study, the corneal higher-order aberration was estimated as the Zernike coefficient calculated up to 5th order. The measurements were taken at a maximum diameter of 6.5 mm using Pentacam.
RESULTS: One week after the operation, the corneal back Z31 of the clear corneal incision group was 0.06 ± 0.06, while the limbus tunnel incision group showed a measurement of 0.05 ± 0.06 (p = 0.031). The corneal back Z40 of the clear corneal incision group was -0.02 ± 0.25, compared to -0.04 ± 0.21 in the limbus tunnel incision group (p = 0.01). One month after the operation, the corneal back SIA of the clear corneal incision group was 0.11 ± 0.11, compared to 0.08 ± 0.11of the limbus tunnel incision group (p = 0.013), the corneal total SIA of the clear corneal incision group was 0.33 ± 0.30, compared to 0.15 ± 0.16 in the limbus tunnel incision group (p = 0.004); the clear corneal incision group exhibited higher levels of back astigmatism and total SIA than the limbus tunnel incision in the post-operation one month period. During the 6- month post-operative follow-up period, no significant difference in Z31, Z40, and other HOA RMS data was observed between the two groups. The total SIA of the corneal incision group and the limbus tunnel incision group were 0.24 ± 0.14 and 0.33 ± 0.32, respectively (p = 0.393), showing no significant difference between the two groups 6 months after the operation.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed no significant difference in the high-order aberration and SIA between clear corneal incision and limbus tunnel incision up to 6 months after ICL-V4c implantation.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the short-term impact of different incision positions on astigmatism and visual quality after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery.
METHODS: This prospective study enrolled patients who decided to have SMILE to correct myopia. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups of different incision positions (group A, B, and C with incision position at 90°, 120°, and 150° respectively). Preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, spherical equivalent, and high-order aberrations (HOAs) were measured and compared among groups. Astigmatism was analyzed with the ASSORT Group Analysis Calculator based on the Alpins method.
RESULTS: A total of 148 eyes were included for analysis (48 eyes in group A, 50 eyes in group B, and 50 eyes in group C). At 1 month postoperatively, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) logMAR in group A, B, and C was - 0.03, - 0.03, and - 0.04, respectively. The mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) logMAR in group A, B, and C was - 0.03, - 0.04, and - 0.04, respectively (P > 0.05). The mean postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) values were - 0.01 ± 0.38, - 0.07 ± 0.39, and - 0.16 ± 0.49 (D) in group A, B, and C, respectively (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative and postoperative magnitude of astigmatism among different groups (P > 0.05). Significant differences were found in the distribution of astigmatism axis among the three groups at 1 day (P = 0.02) and 1 week (P = 0.02) postoperatively. However, such differences were no longer significant at 1 month after surgery (P > 0.05). No significant differences were found in HOAs among different groups 1 month after surgery (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Different incision positions have no effect on postoperative astigmatism and visual quality 1 month after SMILE surgery, though differences were found in the distribution of the astigmatism axis within 1 week after the surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze changes in surgically induced corneal astigmatism and articial intraocular lens (IOL) stability over time following cataract surgery. To compare the interchangeability of measurements between an automatic keratorefractometer (AKRM) and a biometer.
METHODS: In this prospective observational study, the above-mentioned parameters were collected from 25 eyes (25 subjects) on the first day, first week, first and third month after uncomplicated cataract surgery. We used IOL-induced astigmatism (difference between refractometry and keratometry) as an indirect indicator of IOL stability change. We used the Blant-Altman method to analyze consistency between devices.
RESULTS: At the above time points, surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) decreased as follows: 0.65 D; 0.62 D; 0.60 D and 0.41 D (in the first day, week, month and third month respectively). Astigmatism induced by changes of the position of the IOL varied as follows: 0.88 D; 0.59 D; 0.44 D and 0.49 D. Changes in both parameters were statistically significant (p0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Both surgically induced astigmatism and astigmatism induced by IOL decreased over time, in which both changes were statistically significant. The decrease in SIA was most pronounced between the first and third month after surgery. For IOL-induced astigmatism, the greatest decrease was within the first month after surgery. The differences in measurement between the biometer and AKRM were statistically insignificant, but the clinical interchangeability between the given methods is questionable, especially with regard to measurement of the astigmatism angle.

To estimate the postoperative astigmatism after small-incision cataract surgery (SICS) done by junior residents at the end of 1 and 3 months.
This observational longitudinal study was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology of a tertiary eye care hospital and research center. 50 patients enrolled in the study underwent manual small incision cataract surgery by junior residents. Preoperative detailed ocular examination was done, which included keratometric estimation using autokeratometer (GR-3300K). Incision length, distance of incision from the limbus, and type of suturing technique were noted. Postoperatively, keratometric readings were noted at 1 and 3 months. Astigmatism (surgically induced astigmatism [SIA]) was estimated using Hill\'s SIA calculator version 2.0. All the analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) ver. 26.0 (IBM Corp., USA) software, and the statistical significance was tested at a 5% level.
Out of 50 patients, 54% had SIA between 1.5 and 2.5 D and 32% had SIA of more than 2.5 D. Only 14% had SIA less than 1.5 D at the end of 1 month. While 52% had SIA between 1.5 and 2.5 D, 22% had SIA between 1.5 and 2.5 D and 26% had SIA less than 1.5 D at the end of 3 months.
The SIA in most of the SICS done by junior residents was above 1.5 D. It depended mainly on the incision length, its distance from the limbus, and the suturing technique.

To investigate vector and refractive astigmatism changes after superotemporal versus temporal clear corneal incision cataract surgery.
Patients were diagnosed with age-related cataract with corneal astigmatism < 1.5 diopters (D) and were divided into two groups: superotemporal incision (R group) and temporal incision (L group). Uncorrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, corneal topography, anterior segment optical coherence tomography was performed pre- and six months postoperatively. Total ocular astigmatism, corneal astigmatism, vector of surgically induced corneal astigmatism (SICA), non-corneal ocular residual astigmatism (N-CORA), postoperative intraocular lens decentration and tilt were analyzed.  Results: Thirty-eight subjects were included: 21, R group; 17, L group. After surgery, the N-CORA decreased significantly from 1.17±0.72 D to 0.73±0.47 D in all patients (P=0.001), 1.03±0.52 D to 0.70±0.40 D in the R group (P=0.005) and 1.35±0.90 D to 0.78±0.55 D in the L group (P=0.033). Significant differences between t:he R and L groups were found in the postoperative meridian of anterior corneal astigmatism (75.95±52.50 vs 116.79±47.29; P=0.017), total corneal astigmatism (51.65±42.75 vs 95.20±57.32; P=0.011), J45 change vector of SICA in the anterior cornea (-0.10±0.18 vs 0.00±0.11; P=0.048) and total cornea surface (-0.14±0.17 vs 0.03±0.12; P=0.001).  Conclusion: The N-CORA decreased significantly after cataract surgery. Superotemporal and temporal incisions caused differences in the meridian components of oblique astigmatism in some patients but did not have a significant effect on the magnitude of corneal astigmatism.