surgical pleth index (SPI)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    玻璃体视网膜手术(VRS)是眼科手术中执行最广泛的精确手术之一;大多数病例仅在区域麻醉(RA)下进行。然而,在特定情况下(例如当患者由于各种原因未能与操作员合作时),全身麻醉(GA),单独或与GA(联合全身区域麻醉,CGR),是执行VRS的唯一安全方法。虽然在手术过程中监测术中抢救阿片类药物镇痛(IROA)的疗效(评估麻醉(AoA)的充分性)可能具有挑战性,手术面积指数(SPI)是检测对伤害性刺激反应的有用工具,可在手术过程中合理滴定阿片类镇痛药(AO).当前的研究调查了基于SPI的芬太尼(FNT)滴定与各种先发制人镇痛(PA)技术相结合对在AoA下进行的VRS各个阶段的术中疼痛感知的影响。总共176名在GA下接受VRS的患者被纳入研究。他们被随机分配到以下五个研究组之一:GA组(对照组)-仅接受全身麻醉的患者;PBB-GA组和球周阻滞术前阻滞(含0.5%布比卡因和2%利多卡因);T-GA组预防性,外用2%丙美卡因;M-GA组,术前静脉输注1.0g的安乃近;P-GA组,术前静脉输注1.0g的对乙酰氨基酚。整个过程分为四个阶段:1期和2期-术前评估,PA管理,并诱导GA;3期-术中观察;4期-术后观察。在所有阶段监测SPI值。观察到在手术区域的各种操作期间发生伤害性感受(表示为ΔSPI>15),以及累积剂量的抢救镇痛,取决于PA管理。在VRS的过程中,抢救FNT剂量因手术阶段和研究组而异.大多数患者,不管他们的小组分配如何,在套管针插入期间需要补充镇痛,GA组患者需要最高剂量。同样,GA组内光凝时IROA的累积剂量最高.预防性多溴联苯和局部麻醉被证明最有效地削弱了对窥器安装的反应,虽然局部麻醉和扑热息痛输注被证明是比其他类型使用PA更有效的镇痛药。在进行的研究中,在整个手术过程中提供有效的镇痛方面,所使用的PA技术均不优于SPI下采用FNT给药的GA;对照组和研究组均有必要给予抢救性OA剂量.
    Vitreoretinal surgery (VRS) is one of the most widely performed precise procedures in ophthalmic surgery; the majority of cases are carried out under regional anaesthesia (RA) only. However, in specific situations (such as when the patient fails to cooperate with the operator for various reasons), general anaesthesia (GA), alone or in combination with GA (combined general-regional anaesthesia, CGR), is the only safe way to perform VRS. While monitoring the efficacy of an intraoperative rescue opioid analgesia (IROA) during surgery (assessing the adequacy of anaesthesia (AoA)) may be challenging, the surgical pleth index (SPI) is a useful tool for detecting the reaction to noxious stimuli and allows for the rational titration of opioid analgesics (AO) during surgery. The current study investigated the influence of the SPI-based titration of fentanyl (FNT) in combination with various pre-emptive analgesia (PA) techniques on intraoperative pain perception during various stages of VRS performed under AoA. A total of 176 patients undergoing VRS under GA were enrolled in the study. They were randomly assigned to one of the five following study arms: Group GA (control group)-patients who received general anaesthesia alone; Group PBB-GA with preprocedural peribulbar block (with 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine); Group T-GA with preventive, topical 2% proparacaine; Group M-GA with a preprocedural intravenous infusion of 1.0 g of metamizole; and Group P-GA with a preprocedural intravenous infusion of 1.0 g of paracetamol. The whole procedure was divided in four stages: Stage 1 and 2-preoperative assessment, PA administration, and the induction of GA; Stage 3-intraoperative observation; Stage 4-postoperative observation. the SPI values were monitored during all stages. The occurrence of nociception (expressed as ∆SPI >15) during various manipulations in the surgical field was observed, as were cumulative doses of rescue analgesia, depending on the PA administered. During the course of VRS, rescue FNT doses varied depending on the stage of surgery and the group investigated. The majority of patients, regardless of their group allocation, needed complementary analgesia during trocar insertion, with Group GA patients requiring the highest doses. Likewise, the highest cumulative doses of IROA were noted during endophotocoagulation in Group GA. Preventive PBB and topical anaesthesia were proven to be most efficient in blunting the response to speculum installation, while topical anaesthesia and paracetamol infusion were shown to be more efficient analgesics during endophotocoagulation than other types used PA. In the performed study, none of the PA techniques used were superior to GA with FNT dosing under the SPI with respect to providing efficient analgesia throughout the whole surgery; there was a necessity to administer a rescue OA dose in both the control and investigated groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    玻璃体视网膜手术需要在选定的患者组中进行全身麻醉(GA)。GA期间术中抢救麻醉镇痛(IRNA)的给药存在术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)的风险。手术面积指数(SPI),GA麻醉(AoA)指导充分性的关键组成部分,优化IRNA的术中滴定。目前的分析评估了在AoA指导下接受平坦部玻璃体切除术(PPV)的患者发生PONV和眼心反射(OCR)的危险因素。总的来说,175名接受PPV的患者被随机分配接受GA和SPI指导的IRNA给药,使用芬太尼单独或除了不同的术前镇痛技术。记录PONV或OCR的任何发生率。肥胖,超重,吸烟状况,晕车,术后难以忍受的疼痛感知,女性性别,在AoA指导下,液体激发和动脉高血压与PONV或OCR的发生率增加无关.糖尿病,不管胰岛素依赖,被发现与PONV的发病率增加有关。包括IRNA的SPI指导的AoA方案可能为个体受试者创造了相似的条件,所以没有发现PONV或OCR发生的危险因素,除了糖尿病。我们建议使用AoA指导GA给药,以降低OCR和PONV率。
    Vitreoretinal surgeries require the administration of general anesthesia (GA) in selected groups of patients. The administration of intraoperative rescue narcotic analgesia (IRNA) during GA poses the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The surgical pleth index (SPI), a crucial component of the adequacy of anesthesia (AoA) guidance of GA, optimizes the intraoperative titration of IRNA. The current analysis evaluated the risk factors for the occurrence of PONV and the oculo-cardiac reflex (OCR) in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) under AoA guidance. In total, 175 patients undergoing PPV were randomly allocated to receive either GA with SPI-guided IRNA administration using fentanyl alone or in addition to different preoperative analgesia techniques. Any incidence of PONV or OCR was recorded. Obesity, overweight, smoking status, motion sickness, postoperative intolerable pain perception, female gender, fluid challenge and arterial hypertension did not correlate with an increased incidence of PONV or OCR under AoA guidance. Diabetes mellitus, regardless of insulin dependence, was found to correlate with the increased incidence of PONV. The AoA regimen including SPI guidance of IRNA presumably created similar conditions for individual subjects, so no risk factors of the occurrence of PONV or OCR were found, except for diabetes mellitus. We recommend using AoA guidance for GA administration to reduce OCR and PONV rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在接受结肠镜检查(CPs)的患者中,静脉镇痛(ISA)期间服用催眠药(HD)和阿片类镇痛药(OA)的剂量不足可能会导致召回(IAwR),术中(IPP)和术后疼痛(PPP),以及术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)。这项研究的目的是评估是否基于状态熵(SE)和手术面积指数(SPI)(麻醉充分性-AoA)的变化值的观察来滴定HD和OA,仅状态熵,或标准实践可以减少不良事件的数量。最终分析中包括了158名患者。与AoA和SE组相比,C组患者的IAwR和IPP发生率在统计学上更高(分别为p<0.01和p<0.05)。反过来,购买力平价率,PONV,两组患者和操作者对ISA的满意度无统计学意义(p>0.05)。血液动力学参数的变化,对高清的需求,和OA有统计学意义,但没有临床价值.在使用异丙酚和FNT的ISA下接受CP的患者中,与标准做法相比,术中SE监测降低了IAwR和IPP的发生率,对购买力平价率没有影响,PONV,或患者和内窥镜医师的满意度。AoA关于异丙酚和FNT滴定的指导,与仅进行SE监控相比,没有减少上述研究参数的发生,施加不必要的额外费用。
    In patients undergoing colonoscopy procedures (CPs), inadequate dosing of hypnotic drugs (HD) and opioid analgesics (OA) during intravenous sedoanalgesia (ISA) may lead to intraprocedural awareness with recall (IAwR), intraprocedural (IPP) and postprocedural pain (PPP), as well as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the titration of HD and OA based on the observance of changing values of state entropy (SE) and surgical pleth index (SPI) (adequacy of anesthesia-AoA), state entropy alone, or standard practice may reduce the number of adverse events. One hundred and fifty-eight patients were included in the final analysis. The rate of IAwR and IPP was statistically more frequent in patients from the C group in comparison with the AoA and SE groups (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). In turn, the rate of PPP, PONV, and patients\' and operators\' satisfaction with ISA between groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Changes in hemodynamic parameters, demand for HD, and OA were statistically significant, but of no clinical value. In patients undergoing CPs under ISA using propofol and FNT, as compared to standard practice, intraprocedural SE monitoring reduced the rate of IAwR and IPP, with no influence on the rate of PPP, PONV, or patients\' and endoscopists\' satisfaction. AoA guidance on propofol and FNT titration, as compared to SE monitoring only, did not reduce the occurrence of the aforementioned studied parameters, imposing an unnecessary extra cost.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Being highly unstable, the critically ill polytrauma patient represents a challenge for the anaesthesia team. The aim of this study was to compare the Entropy and Surgical Pleth Index (SPI)-guided general anaesthesia with standard haemodynamic monitoring methods used in the critically ill polytrauma patients and to evaluate the incidence of hemodynamic events, as well as the opioid and vasopressor demand. 72 patients were included in this prospective observational study, divided in two groups, the ESPI Group (N = 37, patients that benefited from Entropy and SPI monitoring) and the STDR Group (N = 35 patients that benefited from standard hemodynamic monitoring). In the ESPI Group general anaesthesia was modulated in order to maintain the Entropy levels between 40 and 60. Analgesia control was achieved by maintaining the SPI levels between 20 and 50. In the STDR Group hypnosis and analgesia were maintained using the standard criteria based on hemodynamic changes. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03095430. The incidence of hypotension episodes was significantly lower in the ESPI Group (N = 3), compared to the STDR Group (N = 71) (p < 0.05). Moreover, the Fentanyl demand was significantly lower in the ESPI Group (p < 0.0001, difference between means 5.000 ± 0.038, 95% confidence interval 4.9250-5.0750), as well as vasopressor medication demand (p < 0.0001, difference between means 0.960 ± 0.063, 95% confidence interval 0.8.334-1.0866). The implementation of multimodal monitoring in the critically ill polytrauma patient brings substantial benefits both to the intraoperative clinical status and to the clinical outcome of these patients by reducing the incidence of anesthesia-related complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号