surgical costs

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    越来越关注与各种骨科手术相关的成本。这里,我们研究了影响手术治疗急性跟腱撕裂相关费用的因素.
    我们回顾性地确定了手术修复急性跟腱撕裂的患者,排除插入性断裂或慢性肌腱问题。使用我们机构的价值驱动成果(VDO)工具,我们评估了总直接成本和设施成本。简而言之,VDO工具包括一个项目级数据库,该数据库可以捕获详细的成本数据-然后将成本报告为相对平均数据。成本变量调整为2022年美元,使用伽马回归将总直接成本与患者特征进行比较,以报告95%CI的成本比。
    我们的队列包括224例跟腱撕裂患者,这些患者是由4名经研究资格训练的足踝外科医师之一手术修复的。人口统计学没有差异,直接总成本,或基于手术定位的设施成本(俯卧n=156,仰卧n=68)。开放式维修(n=215),与使用市售仪器的经皮技术(n=9)相比,总直接费用减少37%(P<.001,95%CI0.55-0.72)。与主要学术医院的手术相比(n=15),门诊护理中心(n=207)的手术总直接费用降低19%(P=.040,95%CI0.66-0.99),设施费用降低41%(P<.001,95%CI0.5-0.7).
    改善具有成本效益的骨科护理仍然是一个越来越重要的目标。跟腱修复的患者定位似乎不会对成本产生有意义的影响。在临床上适当的时候,在门诊中心考虑手术位置似乎可以降低手术成本。
    三级,回顾性比较研究。
    UNASSIGNED: Increasing attention is being paid to the costs associated with various orthopaedic surgeries. Here, we studied the factors that influence costs associated with surgically treated acute Achilles tendon tears.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively identified patients with surgically repaired acute Achilles tendon tears, excluding insertional ruptures or chronic tendon issues. Using the Value Driven Outcome (VDO) tool from our institution, we assessed total direct costs as well as facility costs. Briefly, the VDO tool includes an item-level database that can capture detailed cost data-costs are then reported as relative mean data. Cost variables were adjusted to 2022 US dollars, and total direct cost was compared with patient characteristics using gamma regressions to report cost ratios with 95% CIs.
    UNASSIGNED: Our cohort consisted of 224 patients with Achilles tendon tears surgically repaired by one of 4 fellowship-trained orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons. There were no differences in demographics, total direct costs, or facility costs based on surgical positioning (prone n = 156, supine n = 68). Open repairs (n = 215), compared with percutaneous techniques (n = 9) that used commercially available instrumentation, had 37% less total direct costs (P < .001, 95% CI 0.55-0.72). Compared with surgery at a main academic hospital (n = 15), procedures at an ambulatory care center (n = 207) had 19% lower total direct costs (P = .040, 95% CI 0.66-0.99) and 41% lower facility costs (P < .001, 95% CI 0.5-0.7).
    UNASSIGNED: Improving cost-effective orthopaedic care remains an increasingly important goal. Patient positioning for Achilles tendon repair does not appear to have meaningful impacts on cost. When clinically appropriate, considering surgery location at an ambulatory center appears to reduce surgical costs.
    UNASSIGNED: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Robotic assistance in pelvic organ prolapse surgery can improve surgeon ergonomics and instrument dexterity compared with traditional laparoscopy but at increased costs.
    To compare total costs for robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RSC) between two robotic platforms at an academic medical center.
    Retrospective cohort of Senhance (Ascensus) RSC between 1/1/2019 and 6/30/21 who were matched 2:1 with DaVinci (Intuitive) RSC. Primary outcome was total costs to hospital system; secondarily we evaluated cost sub-categories. Purchase costs of the robotic systems were not included. T-test, chi-square, and Fisher\'s exact tests were used. A multivariable linear regression was performed to model total costs adjusting for potential confounders.
    The matched cohort included 75 subjects. The 25 Senhance and 50 DaVinci cases were similar overall, with mean age 60.5 ± 9.7, BMI 27.9 ± 4.7, and parity 2.5 ± 1.0. Majority were white (97.3%) and postmenopausal (86.5%) with predominantly stage III prolapse (64.9%). Senhance cases had longer OR times (Δ = 32.1 min, p = 0.01). There were no differences in concomitant procedures, intraoperative complications, or short-term postoperative complications between platforms (all p > 0.05). On univariable analysis, costs were similar (Senhance $5368.31 ± 1486.89, DaVinci $5741.76 ± 1197.20, p = 0.29). Cost subcategories (medications, supplies, etc.) were also similar (all p > 0.05). On multivariable linear regression, total cost was $908.33 lower for Senhance (p = 0.01) when adjusting for operative time, estimated blood loss, concomitant mid-urethral sling, and use of the GelPoint mini port system.
    Despite longer operating times, total cost of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy was significantly lower when using the Senhance compared to the DaVinci system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于价值的捆绑需要外科医生了解其成本。目前的成本报告方法令人困惑,难以重现。使用Epic手术接收功能,我们描述了一种直观和系统的方法来评估手术室内的财务数据。
    方法:我们对2020年1月1日至2021年1月1日在一个学术医疗中心进行的所有先天性心脏手术进行了回顾性回顾。使用Epic手术接收功能获得直接手术室供应成本。根据对年度总成本的贡献和案例成本的可变性对成本进行了分析。然后在成人心脏手术中评估先天性心脏手术中确定的策略的含义。
    结果:代表71名患者的五种手术占直接手术室供应总费用的50%以上(左心室辅助装置,Norwood程序,肺动脉瓣置换术,右心室-肺动脉分流术,和主动脉弓增强)。一次性血管夹,缝线品牌偏好,手术补片材料占3.7%,6.6%,和每年直接手术室供应成本的26.5%,分别。这些类别的改进将代表12%至14%(250000美元)的年度节省,而不会对结果产生预期影响。在成人和先天性心脏手术中,所有名牌缝合线使用的95%与偏好卡有关。名牌聚丙烯缝合线的选择加入与默认方法每年可节省超过25万美元。
    结论:手术收据代表了报告手术费用的可靠和直观的方式。系统分析成本及其对结果的影响将有助于外科医生提高他们提供的护理价值。
    Value-based bundles require surgeons to understand their costs. Current approaches to cost reporting are confusing and difficult to reproduce. Using the Epic surgical receipt function, we describe an intuitive and systematic approach for evaluating financial data within the operating room.
    We conducted a retrospective review of all congenital cardiac procedures performed at a single academic medical center between January 1, 2020, and January 1, 2021. Direct operating room supply costs were obtained using the Epic surgical receipt function. Costs were analyzed on the basis of contribution to total annual cost and variability in case cost. Implications for strategies identified within congenital cardiac surgery were then evaluated in adult cardiac surgery.
    Five procedures representing 71 patients accounted for more than 50% of the total direct operating room supply costs (left ventricular assist device, Norwood procedure, pulmonary valve replacement, right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery shunt, and aortic arch augmentation). Disposable vascular clips, suture brand preference, and surgical patch materials accounted for 3.7%, 6.6%, and 26.5% of annual direct operating room supply costs, respectively. Improvements to these categories would represent 12% to 14% ($250 000) in annual savings without an anticipated effect on outcomes. Across adult and congenital cardiac surgery, 95% of all name-brand suture use was tied to preference cards. An opt-in vs default approach to name-brand polypropylene suture could save more than $250 000 annually.
    The surgical receipt represents a reliable and intuitive way for reporting surgical costs. Systematically analyzing costs and their impact on outcomes will help surgeons improve the value of care they provide.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了比较在门诊和住院环境中进行的相同外科手术,以确定与此选择相关的人口统计信息,30天重访率的差异,以及30天护理的总费用。
    回顾性队列分析。
    佛罗里达州的门诊和住院中心,纽约,和马里兰州。
    医疗保健成本和利用项目,国家门诊手术和服务数据库,和州住院患者数据库用于确定2016年接受耳鼻咽喉科常规手术的患者.国家急诊科数据库和国家住院患者数据库用于识别30天的重诊。
    共有55,311例患者接受了耳鼻喉手术:51,136例(92.4%)门诊和4175例(7.6%)住院。黑人患者在门诊接受护理的调整后几率显着降低(赔率比,0.69[95%CI,0.55-0.85];P=.001)和非特定其他种族(赔率比,与白人患者相比,0.71[95%CI,0.52-0.95];P=.001)。女性在非卧床环境中接受手术的校正几率高1.16(95%CI,1.05-1.29;P=0.005)。在头颈部手术的分类中,保险状况和收入与护理地点相关。调整后的住院手术费用明显高于门诊(中位数,59,112美元对14,899美元);住院手术的30天调整后费用为71,333.07美元(95%CI,56,223.99美元-86,42.15美元;P<.001),与门诊手术相比,住院手术的费用更高;调整后的30天重诊几率是所有手术的2.23倍(95%CI,1.44-3.44;P<.001)。
    使用非卧床设置提供耳鼻喉手术存在差异。需要进行额外的研究,以确保手术护理环境的公平分类。
    To compare the same surgical procedure performed in ambulatory and inpatient settings to determine the demographics associated with this selection, the differences in 30-day revisit rates, and the total 30-day cost of care.
    Retrospective cohort analysis.
    Ambulatory and inpatient centers in Florida, New York, and Maryland.
    The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, the State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database, and the State Inpatient Database were used to identify patients undergoing commonly performed otolaryngologic procedures in 2016. The State Emergency Department Database and State Inpatient Database were used to identify 30-day revisits.
    A total of 55,311 patients underwent an otolaryngologic procedure: 51,136 (92.4%) ambulatory and 4175 (7.6%) inpatient. Adjusted odds of receiving care in the ambulatory setting was significantly lower for Black patients (odds ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.55-0.85]; P = .001) and nonspecified other races (odds ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.52-0.95]; P = .001) as compared with White patients. Women had 1.16-higher adjusted odds of undergoing a procedure in the ambulatory setting (95% CI, 1.05-1.29; P = .005). Insurance status and income were associated with location of care in the subcategorization of head and neck surgery. Adjusted inpatient procedure costs were significantly more than ambulatory (median, $59,112 vs $14,899); 30-day adjusted costs were $71,333.07 (95% CI, $56,223.99-$86,42.15; P < .001) more expensive for inpatient procedures vs ambulatory; and the adjusted 30-day odds of revisit were 2.23 times greater (95% CI, 1.44-3.44; P < .001) for ambulatory surgery across all procedures.
    Disparities exist in the use of ambulatory settings to provide otolaryngologic surgery. Additional research is required to ensure equitable triaging of surgical care setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在坦桑尼亚,获得外科护理的机会很差。该国正处于第一次全国外科手术的实施阶段,产科,和麻醉计划(NSOAP;2018-2025)旨在扩大手术规模。这项研究旨在计算在地区和地区医院提供外科护理的成本。
    方法:选择阿鲁沙地区的两家地区医院(DHs)和地区转诊医院(RH)。所有的工作人员,建筑物,设备,从访谈和医院记录中确定并量化了在12个月内运营医院的医疗和非医疗用品。采用步降成本法(SDC)和作业成本法(ABC)相结合的方法,确定所有手术费用,然后将其分配给各个手术类型.这些费用被划分为术前费用,术中,和术后部件。
    结果:运营临床成本中心的年度总成本从OltrumetDH的567k美元到MtMeruRH的3453k美元不等。手术总费用从$79k到$813k不等;占医院总费用的12%-22%。至少70%的成本是工资。DHs的单位成本和资本成本的相对份额普遍较高。所有程序的三分之二在剧院中至少产生了60%的费用。在地区医院进行的切开复位和内固定术(ORIF)比手术清创(加保守治疗)便宜(618美元),这是由于与后者相关的长期术后住院护理(1177美元)。但很少进行,主要是由于无法使用植入物。
    结论:RH较低的单位成本和资本成本份额反映了RH的规模经济和范围经济优势,以及DHs产能可能未充分利用。更高的效率为在手术室集中和扩大手术服务提供了理由,但是有更强的理由扩大地区一级的手术,不仅是为了公平获得服务,而且为了降低那里的单位成本,并为更复杂的情况(如ORIF)释放RH资源。
    Access to surgical care is poor in Tanzania. The country is at the implementation stage of its first National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP; 2018-2025) aiming to scale up surgery. This study aimed to calculate the costs of providing surgical care at the district and regional hospitals.
    Two district hospitals (DHs) and the regional referral hospital (RH) in Arusha region were selected. All the staff, buildings, equipment, and medical and non-medical supplies deployed in running the hospitals over a 12 month period were identified and quantified from interviews and hospital records. Using a combination of step-down costing (SDC) and activity-based costing (ABC), all costs attributed to surgeries were established and then distributed over the individual types of surgeries. These costs were delineated into pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative components.
    The total annual costs of running the clinical cost centres ranged from $567k at Oltrumet DH to $3453k at Mt Meru RH. The total costs of surgeries ranged from $79k to $813k; amounting to 12%-22% of the total costs of running the hospitals. At least 70% of the costs were salaries. Unit costs and relative shares of capital costs were generally higher at the DHs. Two-thirds of all the procedures incurred at least 60% of their costs in the theatre. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) performed at the regional hospital was cheaper ($618) than surgical debridement (plus conservative treatment) due to prolonged post-operative inpatient care associated with the latter ($1177), but was performed infrequently due mostly to unavailability of implants.
    Lower unit costs and shares of capital costs at the RH reflect an advantage of economies of scale and scope at the RH, and a possible underutilization of capacity at the DHs. Greater efficiencies make a case for concentration and scale-up of surgical services at the RHs, but there is a stronger case for scaling up district-level surgeries, not only for equitable access to services, but also to drive down unit costs there, and free up RH resources for more complex cases such as ORIF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To characterize regional variation in the age of patients undergoing umbilical hernia repair to determine costs and subsequent care.
    METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional descriptive study using a large convenience sample of US employer-based insurance claims from July 2012 to December 2015. We identified children younger than 18 years of age undergoing uncomplicated (not strangulated, incarcerated, or gangrenous) umbilical hernia repair as an isolated procedure (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision procedure codes 53.41, 53.42, 53.43, or 53.49, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision procedure code 0WQF0ZZ, or Current Procedural Terminology procedure codes 49580 or 49585).
    RESULTS: In all, 5212 children met criteria for inclusion. Children younger than age 2 years accounted for 9.7% of repairs, with significant variation by census region (6% to 14%, P < .001). Total payments for surgery varied by age; children younger than 2 years averaged $8219 and payments for older children were $6137. Postoperative admissions occurred at a rate of 73.1 per 1000 for children younger than age 2 years and 7.43 for older children; emergency department visits were 41.5 per 1000 for children younger than age 2 years vs 15.9 for older children (P < .001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Umbilical hernias continue to be repaired at early ages with large regional variation. Umbilical hernia repair younger than age 2 years is associated with greater costs and greater frequency of postoperative hospitalization and emergency department visits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Financial protection from catastrophic health care expenditure (CHE) and patient out-of-pocket (OOP) spending are key indicators for sustainable surgical delivery. We aimed to calculate these metrics for a hospital stay requiring surgery in Uganda\'s pediatric population.
    A survey was administered to family members of postoperative patients in the pediatric surgical ward at Mulago Hospital. Cost categories included direct medical costs, direct nonmedical costs, indirect costs, plus money borrowed and items sold to pay for the hospital stay. CHE was defined as spending greater than 10% of annual household expenditure. Costs were reported in Ugandan shillings and US dollars.
    One hundred and thirty-two patient families were surveyed between November 2016 and April 2017. Median direct costs were $27.55 (IQR 18.73-183.69) for diagnostics, $18.36 (IQR 9.52-41.33) for medications, $26.63 (IQR 9.19-45.92) for transportation, and $32.60 (IQR 12.85-64.29) for food and lodging. Forty-four percent of respondents were employed, and median indirect cost from productivity loss was $95.52 (IQR 55.10-243.38). Eighteen percent (16/87) borrowed money, and 9% (8/87) sold possessions to pay for the hospital stay. Total median OOP cost for patient families per hospital stay was $150.62 (IQR 65.21-339.82). Sixteen percent (21/132) of families incurred CHE from direct costs, and the proportion rose to 27% (32/132) when indirect cost was included.
    Although pediatric surgical services in Uganda are formally provided for free by the public sector, families accrue substantial OOP expenditure and almost a third of households incur CHE for a pediatric surgical procedure. This study suggests that broader financial protection must be established to meet Sustainable Development Goal targets.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the association between outpatient orthopedic surgery costs and Japan\'s healthcare facilities using a large-scale Japanese medical claims database. Design/methodology/approach The authors obtained reimbursement claims data for 8,588 patients who underwent orthopedic surgery between April 1 and September 30, 2014 at 3,347 Japanese healthcare facilities. Regression analysis, using ordinary least squares, examined the association between outpatient orthopedic surgery costs and healthcare facility characteristics. By using surgical fees as proxy for the surgical costs, the authors defined three dependent variables: surgical cost for each outpatient orthopedic surgery; pre- and post-operative cost one month before and after a surgical operation; and total cost for each patient. The authors also defined five independent variables, which capture healthcare facility characteristics and patient-specific factors: bed count; whether healthcare facilities are reimbursed in a diagnosis procedure combination system; patient\'s age; sex; and anatomical surgical sites. Findings The authors analyzed 6,456 outpatient orthopedic surgical cases performed at 3,085 healthcare facilities. There were significant differences in the surgical costs for outpatient orthopedic surgery among different healthcare facilities by total beds ( p=0.000). Multivariate regression analysis shows that surgical costs for outpatient orthopedic surgery are positively and significantly associated with healthcare facilities classified by total beds after adjusting for patient-specific characteristics ( p<0.05). Originality/value This is the first research to examine the association between costs for outpatient orthopedic surgery and healthcare facility characteristics in Japan. This study via the multivariate regression method showed that outpatient orthopedic surgery is likely to cost higher as healthcare facility size increased. The average incremental costs for each outpatient orthopedic surgery per 100 beds were calculated at $48.5 for surgery, $40.7 for pre- and post-operative care, and $89.2 total cost.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Evaluation Study
    Robotic technology is being utilized in multiple hepatobiliary procedures, including hepatic resections. The benefits of minimally invasive surgical approaches have been well documented; however, there is some concern that robotic liver surgery may be prohibitively costly and therefore should be limited on this basis. A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was performed of robotic and open liver resections performed for benign and malignant pathologies. Clinical and cost outcomes were analyzed using adjusted generalized linear regression models. Clinical and cost data for 71 robotic (RH) and 88 open (OH) hepatectomies were analyzed. Operative time was significantly longer in the RH group (303 vs. 253 min; p = 0.004). Length of stay was more than 2 days shorter in the RH group (4.2 vs. 6.5 days; p < 0.001). RH perioperative costs were higher ($6026 vs. $5479; p = 0.047); however, postoperative costs were significantly lower, resulting in lower total hospital direct costs compared with OH controls ($14,754 vs. $18,998; p = 0.001). Robotic assistance is safe and effective while performing major and minor liver resections. Despite increased perioperative costs, overall RH direct costs are not greater than OH, the current standard of care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号