suprascapular nerve

肩胛骨上神经
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:经皮神经电刺激(PENS)似乎是治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛的有效方法。这项试验的目的是研究对残疾和疼痛的影响,以及在肩峰下疼痛综合征患者的运动计划中添加PENS的心理方面。方法:随机,我们进行了平行组临床试验.60例肩峰下疼痛患者被分配到单独运动中(n=20),运动加PENS(n=20),或运动加安慰剂PENS(n=20)组。所有组的患者每天两次进行锻炼计划,持续3周。分配给PENS组的患者还接受了四次针对腋窝和肩胛骨上神经的超声引导PENS。分配给运动加安慰剂PENS的患者接受了假PENS申请。主要结果是相关残疾(手臂残疾,肩膀,手,DASH)。次要结果包括平均疼痛,焦虑程度,抑郁症状,和睡眠质量。他们在基线时进行评估,一周后,一个月和三个月后。使用混合模型ANCOVA的意向治疗进行分析。结果:结果显示大多数结果没有组间差异(相关残疾:F=0.292,p=0.748,n2p=0.011;焦虑:F=0.780,p=0.463,n2p=0.027;抑郁症状:F=0.559,p=0.575,n2p=0.02;或睡眠质量:F=0.294,p=0.747,n2p=0.01;两组在整个研究过程中经历了与运动组(Δ-1.2,95CI-2.3至-0.1)或安慰剂组(Δ-1.3,95CI-2.5至-0.1)相比,接受运动加PENS的患者在一个月时肩痛的改善更大。结论:在我们的肩峰下疼痛综合征患者样本中,在治疗后1个月和3个月,将针对腋窝和肩胛骨上神经的四个超声引导下PENS纳入锻炼计划并没有带来更好的结果。
    Objective: Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) appears to be effective for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain. The aim of this trial was to investigate the effects on disability and pain, as well as on the psychological aspects of adding PENS into an exercise program in patients with subacromial pain syndrome. Methods: A randomized, parallel-group clinical trial was conducted. Sixty patients with subacromial pain were allocated into exercise alone (n = 20), exercise plus PENS (n = 20), or exercise plus placebo PENS (n = 20) groups. Patients in all groups performed an exercise program twice daily for 3 weeks. Patients allocated to the PENS group also received four sessions of ultrasound-guided PENS targeting the axillar and suprascapular nerves. Patients allocated to the exercise plus placebo PENS received a sham PENS application. The primary outcome was related disability (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, DASH). Secondary outcomes included mean pain, anxiety levels, depressive symptoms, and sleep quality. They were assessed at baseline, one week after, and one and three months after. An analysis was performed using intention-to-treat with mixed-models ANCOVAs. Results: The results revealed no between-group differences for most outcomes (related disability: F = 0.292, p = 0.748, n2p = 0.011; anxiety: F = 0.780, p = 0.463, n2p = 0.027; depressive symptoms: F = 0.559, p = 0.575, n2p = 0.02; or sleep quality: F = 0.294, p = 0.747, n2p = 0.01); both groups experienced similar changes throughout the course of this study. Patients receiving exercise plus PENS exhibited greater improvement in shoulder pain at one month than those in the exercise (Δ -1.2, 95%CI -2.3 to -0.1) or the placebo (Δ -1.3, 95%CI -2.5 to -0.1) groups. Conclusions: The inclusion of four sessions of ultrasound-guided PENS targeting the axillar and suprascapular nerves into an exercise program did not result in better outcomes in our sample of patients with subacromial pain syndrome at one and three months after treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肩膀疼痛是最常见的咨询原因之一。已经描述了多种治疗方法来缓解疼痛,恢复运动范围和改善功能。
    这项随机临床试验在60名患者中进行。治疗组接受肩胛骨上神经(SN)和腋窝回旋神经(ACN)联合脉冲射频(PRF)治疗。对照组仅在SN上接收PRF。主要结果是通过数值评定量表(NRS)测量的疼痛强度。次要结果是肩痛和残疾指数(SPADI),手臂的恒定-Murley运动范围和残疾,肩和手(DASH)刻度。在基线访视和1、3、6和9个月时监测患者。估计了混合序数回归模型来评估研究组与使用NRS测量的疼痛之间的关联。
    观察到在研究结束时疼痛总体减轻。全球基线NRS为8.4,随访9个月时全球最终NRS为6.2。与单一SNPRF相比,SN和ACN的联合PRF与较低的NRS疼痛评分无关[比值比(OR)=1.04,95%置信区间(CI)0.91-1.20,P=0.507]。次要结果没有显着差异:SPADI(OR=1.04,95%CI0.92-1.18),Constant-Murley(OR=1.01,95%CI0.90-1.14),DASH(OR=1.04,95%CI0.92-1.17)。
    应用于SN和ACN的组合PRF并不优于单独应用于SN的PRF。
    UNASSIGNED: Painful shoulder is one of the most frequent consultation causes. Multiple treatments have been described to relieve pain, restore range of motion and improve functionality.
    UNASSIGNED: This randomised clinical trial was conducted in 60 patients. The treatment group received combined pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) on suprascapular nerve (SN) and axillary-circumflex nerve (ACN). The control group received PRF on SN only. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The secondary outcomes were the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), the Constant-Murley range of motion scale and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scale. The patients were monitored at the baseline visit and at 1, 3, 6 and 9 months. A mixed ordinal regression model was estimated to evaluate the association between the study group and pain measured with NRS.
    UNASSIGNED: A global decrease in pain at the end of the study was noted. The global baseline NRS was 8.4, and the global final NRS at 9 months of follow-up was 6.2. Combined PRF on SN and ACN was not associated with lower NRS pain scores compared to single SN PRF [odds ratio (OR) =1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-1.20, P = 0.507]. Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences: SPADI (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.92-1.18), Constant-Murley (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.90-1.14), DASH (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.92-1.17).
    UNASSIGNED: Combined PRF applied to SN and ACN was not superior to PRF applied to SN alone.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肩胛骨痛或肩痛占健康成年人群中所有肌肉骨骼疾病的16%,并且随着年龄的增长而变得越来越普遍。当这种疼痛持续时间超过3个月时,它被认为是慢性的,通常以逐步升级的方式处理。跨越保守和非保守措施的连续体,慢性肩痛的治疗范围从休息和物理治疗到手术。由于每个患者都表现出独特的症状谱,因此通常需要定制的治疗计划。在这些患者的一生中,需要多种治疗方案。这些治疗选择之一,周围神经刺激(PNS),是一种微创手术,其中电脉冲通过经皮植入,小口径电极连接到病变附近的周围神经,干扰疼痛信号。在过去的几年里,已观察到PNS在治疗慢性神经性疼痛中的显着增长。然而,程序技术没有得到很好的描述。长期的基础,微创经皮PNS治疗慢性肩痛,本报告将介绍使用透视或超声检查刺激肩胛骨上和腋下神经的手术技术。
    Scapulalgia or shoulder pain accounts for 16% of all musculoskeletal complaints in the healthy adult population and becomes more common as we age. When this pain exceeds 3 months in duration, it is deemed to be chronic, and typically treated in an escalating manner. Spanning a continuum of conservative and non-conservative measures, chronic shoulder pain treatments range from rest and physical therapy to surgery. Since each patient presents with a unique spectrum of symptoms a customized treatment plan is often required. Over the lifetime of many of these patients, a variety of treatment options are required. One of these treatment options, peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), is a minimally invasive procedure in which an electrical impulse is delivered through a percutaneously implanted, small caliber electrode to a peripheral nerve proximal to the lesion which interferes with the pain signals. Over the past several years, significant growth of PNS in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain has been observed. However, the procedural techniques have not been well described. The foundation of long-term, minimally invasive percutaneous PNS in patients with chronic shoulder pain, and procedural techniques for stimulating the suprascapular and axillary nerves using fluoroscopy or ultrasonography will be described in this report.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:描述的开放性Trillat手术治疗复发性肩关节不稳定,随着关节镜的出现,人们重新产生了兴趣。理论上,肩胛骨上神经(SSN)在肩胛骨附近钻孔时处于危险之中。这项研究的目的是评估开放Trilat手术期间固定喙突转移的螺钉与SSN之间的关系,并为SSN定义安全区域。
    方法:在这项解剖学研究中,在十个肩膀标本上进行了开放式Trillat程序。在部分截骨和肩胛骨颈前后钻孔后,用螺钉固定喙突。用螺钉的标识解剖SSN。我们测量了SSN-螺钉(距离1)和SSN-关节盂边缘(距离2)的距离。在轴向平面中,我们测量了关节盂平面与螺钉之间的角度(α角)以及关节盂平面与SSN之间的角度(β角)。
    结果:SSN螺钉的平均距离为8.8mm/-5.4(0-15)。平均α角为11°+/-2.4(8-15)。平均β角为22°+/-6.7(12-30)。没有记录到SSN的宏观病变,但在20%(2例),螺钉与神经接触。在这两种情况下,β角测量为12°。
    结论:在开放式Trillat程序中,SSN可能由于其解剖位置而受伤。螺钉的放置应在关节盂平面的10°范围内,以最大程度地减少SSN损伤的风险,并且可能需要使用特定的指南或关节镜辅助手术。
    OBJECTIVE: The open Trillat Procedure described to treat recurrent shoulder instability, has a renewed interest with the advent of arthroscopy. The suprascapular nerve (SSN) is theoretically at risk during the drilling of the scapula near the spinoglenoid notch. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the screw securing the coracoid transfer and the SSN during open Trillat Procedure and define a safe zone for the SSN.
    METHODS: In this anatomical study, an open Trillat Procedure was performed on ten shoulders specimens. The coracoid was fixed by a screw after partial osteotomy and antero-posterior drilling of the scapular neck. The SSN was dissected with identification of the screw. We measured the distances SSN-screw (distance 1) and SSN-glenoid rim (distance 2). In axial plane, we measured the angles between the glenoid plane and the screw (α angle) and between the glenoid plane and the SSN (β angle).
    RESULTS: The mean distance SSN-screw was 8.8 mm +/-5.4 (0-15). Mean α angle was 11°+/-2.4 (8-15). Mean β angle was 22°+/-6.7 (12-30). No macroscopic lesion of the SSN was recorded but in 20% (2 cases), the screw was in contact with the nerve. In both cases, the β angle was measured at 12°.
    CONCLUSIONS: During the open Trillat Procedure, the SSN can be injured due to its anatomical location. Placement of the screw should be within 10° of the glenoid plane to minimize the risk of SSN injury and could require the use of a specific guide or arthroscopic-assisted surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:连续外周神经阻滞通常用于疼痛管理。然而,导管移位或移位的发生率尚不清楚,可能被低估和低估。我们的目的是评估解剖尸体模型中常规模拟肩部理疗操作之前和之后的肩胛骨上导管尖端定位。
    方法:将8个超声引导下连续肩胛骨上神经阻滞导管放置在冷冻保存的新鲜尸体中。计算机断层扫描(CT)确认了注射1ml造影剂后导管尖端的位置。在尸体的模拟肩部理疗过程中,我们进行了一系列标准化的肩部运动。在此之后,我们通过导管给药1ml亚甲蓝,然后进行解剖解剖,以准确识别导管尖端的位置,并将其与“理疗”之前的位置进行比较。结果:在所有情况下,CT成像均确认了导管尖端在肩胛骨上切迹处的位置。然而,理疗后,发现2根导管(25%)迁移-特别是1位于冈上肌,另一个位于斜方肌。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,在模拟物理治疗操作后,约25%的病例可能发生导管移位。然而,需要进一步的研究来确定临床实践中导管移位的读取发生率.
    BACKGROUND: Continuous peripheral nerve blocks are commonly used for pain management. However, the incidence of catheter dislodgement or migration is unclear, and may be underestimated and underreported. Our objective was to assess suprascapular catheter tip positioning before and after routine simulated shoulder physiotherapy manipulation in an anatomical cadaver model.
    METHODS: Eight ultrasound-guided continuous suprascapular nerve block catheters were placed in cryopreserved fresh cadavers. Computed tomography (CT) confirmed the location of the catheter tip after injection of 1 ml of contrast medium. We performed a series of standardized shoulder movements during a simulated shoulder physiotherapy session in cadavers. Following this, we administered 1 ml of methylene blue through the catheters, and then performed anatomical dissections to accurately identify the location of the catheter tips and compare them to their placement prior to the \'physiotherapy\'.
    RESULTS: CT imaging confirmed the location of the catheter tips at the suprascapular notch in all cases. However, following physiotherapy, 2 catheters (25%) were found to have migrated - specifically, 1 was located in the supraspinatus muscle, and the other was located in the trapezius muscle.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that catheter dislodgement may occur in approximately 25% of cases following simulated physiotherapy manipulation. However, further research is needed to determine the read incidence of catheter dislodgement in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    中风后肩痛(PSSP)是一种常见的并发症,会限制肩膀的活动范围(ROM),病人的康复,反过来,影响患者的生活质量(QOL)。几种治疗方式,如吊索,定位,捆扎,功能性电刺激(FES),和神经阻滞已经在文献中提出,然而,没有一种治疗对PSSP有长期影响。在这项研究中,作者评估了脉冲射频(PRF)神经调制对PSSP的临床疗效,并建议将其作为具有长期效果的潜在治疗方法。
    这个回顾性病例系列是在一个中心进行的,私人执业机构。从2013年到2021年,13例PSSP患者接受了肩胛骨上神经的PRF神经调节。主要结果指标是视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。次要结果测量包括肩部ROM,残疾评估量表(DAS),改良的Ashworth量表(MAS),改良的Rankin量表(MRS),和EuroQol-5维度-3L问卷(EQ-5D-3L)得分。在PRF调制之前评估这些参数,在PRF调制后立即,每三个月一次,直到最后一次随访。
    注册了6名男性和7名女性,所有患者随访至少12个月.PRF神经调节前的平均VAS评分为7.07分,术后立即为2.38分。用于外展和屈曲的肩部ROM,疼痛的DAS,mRS,和EQ-5D-3L表现出显著的改善。无并发症报告。
    肩胛骨上神经的PRF神经调节是PSSP患者的有效方法,并具有缓解疼痛的长期效果,改善QOL。
    UNASSIGNED: Post-stroke shoulder pain (PSSP) is a common complication that limits the range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder, the patient\'s rehabilitation and in turn, affects the patients\' quality of life (QOL). Several treatment modalities such as sling, positioning, strapping, functional electrical stimulation (FES), and nerve block have been suggested in literatures, however none of the treatments had long-term effects for PSSP. In this study, the authors evaluated clinical efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) neuromodulation on the suprascapular nerve for PSSP, and suggested it as a potential treatment with long-term effect.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective case series was conducted at a single center, a private practice institution. From 2013 to 2021, 13 patients with PSSP underwent PRF neuromodulation of the suprascapular nerve. The primary outcome measure was the visual analog scale (VAS) score. The secondary outcome measurements included the shoulder ROM, disability assessment scale (DAS), modified Ashworth scale (mAS), modified Rankin scale (mRS), and EuroQol-5 dimension-3L questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) scores. These parameters were evaluated before PRF modulation, immediately after PRF modulation, and every three months until the final follow-up visit.
    UNASSIGNED: Six men and seven women were enrolled, and all patients were followed-up for a minimum of 12 months. The mean VAS score was 7.07 points before PRF neuromodulation and 2.38 points immediately post-procedure. Shoulder ROM for abduction and flexion, DAS for pain, mRS, and EQ-5D-3L demonstrated marked improvement. No complications were reported.
    UNASSIGNED: PRF neuromodulation of the suprascapular nerve is an effective modality in patients with PSSP, and has long-term effect of pain relief, improvement of QOL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:臂丛神经出生损伤(BPBI)是一种常见的损伤,其疾病预后范围从自发恢复到终身衰弱。BPBI的常见后遗症是肱骨发育不良(GHD),如果没有尽早解决,随着孩子的成熟,会导致肩部功能障碍。然而,对于何时采用各种外科手术来矫正GHD,目前尚无明确的标准.
    方法:我们描述了我们使用从脊柱附件到肩胛骨上神经的反向端对侧(ETS)转移来纠正患有BPBIs的婴儿GDH的方法。该技术用于患有GHD且外部旋转(ER)功能较差的婴儿,这些婴儿不需要完全的端到端转移,并且对于肌腱转移来说还太年轻。在这项研究中,我们介绍了7例患者的结局.
    结果:在演讲中,所有患者均存在上躯干持续无力和肩关节功能受限.护理点超声在每种情况下都证实了GHD。五名患者是男性,两个病人是女性,演示时平均年龄为3.3个月(4天至7个月)。手术平均在5.8个月(3-8.6个月)进行。根据最新随访的活动运动评分,采用反向ETS方法治疗的所有7例患者的ER均已完全恢复。此外,最新随访的超声显示GHD完全消退。
    结论:在患有BPBI且有GHD证据且ER较差的婴儿中,端到端的神经转移,最初降级功能,或者肌腱转移,不适合患者的年龄,不推荐。相反,我们报告了7例成功的婴儿在BPBI后接受了肩胛骨上神经转移的ETS脊髓附件治疗GHD的病例.
    OBJECTIVE: Brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) is a common injury with the spectrum of disease prognosis ranging from spontaneous recovery to lifelong debilitating disability. A common sequela of BPBI is glenohumeral dysplasia (GHD) which, if not addressed early on, can lead to shoulder dysfunction as the child matures. However, there are no clear criteria for when to employ various surgical procedures for the correction of GHD.
    METHODS: We describe our approach to correcting GDH in infants with BPBIs using a reverse end-to-side (ETS) transfer from the spinal accessory to the suprascapular nerve. This technique is employed in infants that present with GHD with poor external rotation (ER) function who would not necessitate a complete end-to-end transfer and are still too young for a tendon transfer. In this study, we present our outcomes in seven patients.
    RESULTS: At presentation, all patients had persistent weakness of the upper trunk and functional limitations of the shoulder. Point-of-care ultrasounds confirmed GHD in each case. Five patients were male, and two patients were female, with a mean age of 3.3 months age (4 days-7 months) at presentation. Surgery was performed on average at 5.8 months of age (3-8.6 months). All seven patients treated with a reverse ETS approach had full recovery of ER according to active movement scores at the latest follow-up. Additionally, ultrasounds at the latest follow-up showed a complete resolution of GHD.
    CONCLUSIONS: In infants with BPBI and evidence of GHD with poor ER, end-to-end nerve transfers, which initially downgrade function, or tendon transfers, that are not age-appropriate for the patient, are not recommended. Instead, we report seven successful cases of infants who underwent ETS spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer for the treatment of GHD following BPBI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:在臂丛手术中,一个关键的焦点是通过前路或后路通过脊髓副神经(SAN)转移到肩胛骨上神经(SSN)恢复肩关节外展。然而,迄今为止,尚无已发表的随机对照试验直接比较其结局.因此,我们的研究旨在评估两种方法的运动结局.方法:本研究包括两组患者。A组:前路(29例),B组:后路(29例)。使用密封信封技术的选择性随机化将患者分为两组。通过使用英国医学研究理事会(MRC)量表对肩展人的肌肉力量进行分级来评估功能结果。结果:5例经后入路手术的患者上横肩胛骨上韧带骨化。在这些情况下,为避免损伤SSN,将入路由后向前改变。由于这个原因,进行治疗分析时考虑到分布为:A组:34,B组:24.A组首次出现肩关节外展临床体征的平均持续时间为8.16个月,而在B组中,是6.85个月,明显更早(p<0.05)。在18个月的随访中,进行了意向治疗分析和治疗分析,SAN与SSN神经转移的方法之间的肩外展结果没有统计学差异。结论:我们的研究发现两种方法在恢复肩关节外展力方面没有显着差异;因此,任何一种方法都可以用于早期出现手术的患者。由于在后路手术中首次出现临床恢复迹象较早,因此,它可以是优选的情况下,在稍后阶段提出。此外,根据锁骨骨折和外科医生对入路的偏好,根据具体情况指导入路的选择。证据级别:II级(治疗)。
    Background: In brachial plexus surgery, a key focus is restoring shoulder abduction through spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to suprascapular nerve (SSN) transfer using either the anterior or posterior approach. However, no published randomised control trials have directly compared their outcomes to date. Therefore, our study aims to assess motor outcomes for both approaches. Methods: This study comprises two groups of patients. Group A: anterior approach (29 patients), Group B: Posterior approach (29 patients). Patients were allocated to both groups using selective randomisation with the sealed envelope technique. Functional outcome was assessed by grading the muscle power of shoulder abductors using the British Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. Results: Five patients who were operated on by posterior approach had ossified superior transverse suprascapular ligament. In these cases, the approach was changed from posterior to anterior to avoid injury to SSN. Due to this reason, the treatment analysis was done considering the distribution as: Group A: 34, Group B: 24. The mean duration of appearance of first clinical sign of shoulder abduction was 8.16 months in Group A, whereas in Group B, it was 6.85 months, which was significantly earlier (p < 0.05). At the 18-month follow-up, both intention-to-treat analysis and as-treated analysis were performed, and there was no statistical difference in the outcome of shoulder abduction between the approaches for SAN to SSN nerve transfer. Conclusions: Our study found no significant difference in the restoration of shoulder abduction power between both approaches; therefore, either approach can be used for patients presenting early for surgery. Since the appearance of first clinical sign of recovery is earlier in posterior approach, therefore, it can be preferred for cases presenting at a later stage. Also, the choice of approach is guided on a case to case basis depending on clavicular fractures and surgeon preference to the approach. Level of Evidence: Level II (Therapeutic).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    肩关节前脱位(ASD)是急诊科(ED)最常见的脱位类型,疼痛严重,活动范围有限。程序镇静和镇痛通常用于ASD,但是区域技术越来越受欢迎。肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞是有效的,但有一些局限性。已经探索了肩胛骨上神经阻滞(SSNB)的适应症。SSNB通常使用坐姿的后部入路进行,并且在脱臼患者中在技术上可能很困难。最近,已经描述了在下颈部进行的前舌骨下入路,但在ED中尚未报道。我们,特此,报告我们在10例ASD患者中使用小容量超声引导的前SSNB进行手术镇痛的经验。
    Anterior shoulder dislocation (ASD) is the most common type of dislocation presented to the emergency department (ED) with severe pain and limitation of range of movement. Procedural sedation and analgesia are commonly used for ASD, but regional techniques are gaining popularity. Interscalene brachial plexus block is effective but has several limitations. Suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) has been explored for this indication. The SSNB is commonly performed using the posterior approach in a sitting position and can be technically difficult in dislocated patients. Recently, anterior subomohyoid approach performed in the lower neck has been described but has not yet been reported in the ED. We, hereby, report our experience of using low-volume ultrasound-guided anterior SSNB for procedural analgesia in 10 patients with ASD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号