supported employment

支持就业
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:持续疼痛是挪威病假和工作残疾的常见原因。以支持的工作实习为特征的重返工作干预,在英国开发,证明了可行性,在6个月内观察到20%的返工率。我们试图调整在挪威交付的干预措施,并在全面试验之前确认可行性。
    方法:在此内部试点中,我们在挪威的国家招募中使用了实用的队列随机对照方法.我们招募了失业者(至少1个月),持续疼痛(至少3个月),年龄在18至64岁之间,并希望重返工作岗位。我们最初招募的人参加了一项观察性队列研究,研究失业持续疼痛的影响。基线测量后,我们随机抽取我们提供干预的参与者,其中包括个案管理和支持,熟悉工作的会议,并提供为期6周的兼职无偿工作安排。我们评估了招聘率(目标是在6个月内招聘66名,子样本17名);最佳招聘途径;干预接受率;数据收集的可行性;使用视频链接进行工作熟悉会议和远程病例经理支持。
    结果:试点时间为2022年6月至11月。在168名表达兴趣的人中,94同意。Facebook上的招聘帖子产生了最多的“兴趣表达”(66%,n=111)。经过资格筛选,我们包括55名参与者。其中,19人被随机分配接受干预。其中,不到一半(n=8)同意参与干预。远程案例管理器和熟悉工作的会议似乎是可行的。在延迟确定位置之后,三名参与者收到了工作实习机会,在试点期间开始和完成一个。数据收集方法可行,未报告不良事件.
    结论:招聘和后勤流程,例如通过视频链接进行远程管理,是可行的。然而,干预措施的实施具有挑战性。特别是,采购配售和确定适当配售所需的时间比预期的更具挑战性。全面试验是可行的,但需要改进放置识别过程。
    背景:ISRCTN85437524(参考ReISE试验,这个内部飞行员是其中的一部分),2022年5月31日注册https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN85437524试验资助:挪威研究委员会。
    BACKGROUND: Persistent pain is a frequent cause of sick leave and work disability in Norway. A return-to-work intervention featuring supported work placements, developed in the UK, demonstrated feasibility, and a return-to-work rate of 20% within 6 months was observed in the sample. We sought to adapt the intervention for delivery in Norway and to confirm feasibility prior to a full-scale trial.
    METHODS: In this internal pilot, we used a pragmatic cohort randomised controlled approach with national recruitment in Norway. We recruited people who were unemployed (for at least 1 month), having persistent pain (for at least 3 months), aged between 18 and 64, and wanting to return to work. We initially recruited people to an observational cohort study of the impact of being unemployed with persistent pain. After baseline measurement, we randomly sub-sampled participants to whom we offered the intervention, which featured individual case management and support, work-familiarisation sessions, and the offer of a 6-week part-time unpaid work placement. We assessed recruitment rates (aiming to recruit 66, and sub-sample 17 within 6 months); optimal recruitment pathways; intervention acceptance rates; the feasibility of data collection; using video links for work-familiarisation sessions and remote case manager support.
    RESULTS: The pilot ran from June to November 2022. Of 168 people expressing interest, 94 consented. Recruitment posts on Facebook yielded the most \'expressions of interest\' (66%, n = 111). After screening for eligibility, we included 55 participants. Of these, 19 were randomised to be offered the intervention. Of these, less than half (n = 8) consented to intervention participation. Remote case manager and work-familiarisation sessions appeared feasible. Following a delay in identifying placements, three participants received offers of work placements, with one starting and completing during the pilot period. Data collection methods were feasible, and no adverse events were reported.
    CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment and logistical processes, such as remote management by video link, are feasible. However, delivery of the intervention is challenging. In particular, sourcing placements and the time required for identifying appropriate placements was more challenging than anticipated. A full-scale trial is feasible but will require improvements to the placement identification processes.
    BACKGROUND: ISRCTN85437524 (Referring to the ReISE trial, of which this internal pilot was a part), Registered 31 of May 2022 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN85437524 TRIAL FUNDING: Norwegian Research Council.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:抑郁症是一种常见的精神障碍,与工作障碍有关。为了实施基于证据的干预措施,例如德国抑郁症患者的个人安置和支持(IPS),这项研究的目的是调查预测重返工作岗位的客户变量。
    方法:样本由129名参与者组成,最初因严重抑郁症在精神病医院接受治疗,他参加了IPS作为德国临床试验的一部分。基线人口统计(年龄,性别,教育,疾病缺席日,就业状况),精神病(症状严重程度,合并症,一般身心健康,残疾),和神经心理学(自我评估的缺陷,测试性能)变量包括在内。使用单独的和整体的二元逻辑回归分析来预测一年内的重返工作。
    结果:在一年的随访期内,共有70名参与者(56%)重返工作岗位。>进入研究前一年的病假100天(vs.<100天)和较高的自我评估认知缺陷与IPS一年内重返工作的几率降低显着相关。
    结论:样本由具有相对良好工作经历的参与者组成,他们被治疗小组分配到IPS,因此,结果的普适性是有限的。
    结论:参与IPS干预的抑郁症患者可能受益于专门针对感知的认知缺陷。与抑郁症导致的长期病假相关的因素及其在返回IPS工作中的作用需要进一步调查。
    BACKGROUND: Depression is a common mental disorder and is associated with work disability. For the implementation of evidence-based interventions, such as Individual Placement and Support (IPS) for people with depression in Germany, the aim of this study was to investigate client variables that predict return to work.
    METHODS: The sample consisted of 129 participants, initially treated in a psychiatric hospital due to major depression, who participated in IPS as part of a German clinical trial. Baseline demographic (age, sex, education, sickness absence days, employment status), psychiatric (symptom severity, comorbidity, general physical and mental health, disability), and neuropsychological (self-rated deficits, test performance) variables were included. Return to work within one year was predicted using separate and overall binary logistic regression analyses.
    RESULTS: A total of 70 participants (56 %) returned to work within the one-year follow-up period. >100 days of sick leave in the year prior to study entry (vs. <100 days) and higher self-rated cognitive deficits were significantly associated with reduced odds of return to work within one year of IPS.
    CONCLUSIONS: The sample consisted of participants with a relatively good work history who were assigned to IPS by the treatment team, thus, the generalizability of the results is limited.
    CONCLUSIONS: People with depression who participate in IPS interventions might benefit from specifically targeting perceived cognitive deficits. Factors associated with prolonged sick leave due to depression and their role in return to work with IPS need further investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的人面临的职业挑战与被诊断为人格障碍(PD)的人不同。支持就业(SE)已得到SMI患者的验证,但其对PD患者的有效性尚不清楚。这种潜在差异的原因还没有被探索。这项研究旨在确定SMI客户和PD客户在SE实践方面的差异。
    采访了六名SE工作教练,了解了他们的经历。进行了专题分析。
    与其他SMI的客户相比,与PD的客户相比,提到了更多的困难和促进因素。对于两者来说,据报道,患者的症状对他们(重新)融入就业市场产生负面影响。然而,与SMI的客户相比,PD患者的症状与SE成功之间的关系涉及困难行为及其对治疗关系的负面影响。
    总之,SE实践似乎受到PD的破坏,可以从适应中受益,例如对SE团队进行特定培训,以帮助他们管理患有这种疾病的客户。
    UNASSIGNED: People with severe mental illnesses (SMI) face different occupational challenges than those diagnosed with personality disorders (PD). Supported employment (SE) has been validated for SMI patients but its effectiveness for individuals with PD remains unclear, and the reasons for this potential difference have not been explored. This study aimed to identify differences in SE practice for clients with SMI and those with PD.
    UNASSIGNED: Six SE job coaches were interviewed about their experiences. A thematic analysis was run.
    UNASSIGNED: More difficulties and facilitators were mentioned regarding clients with PD than regarding clients with other SMI. For both, patients\' symptoms were reported to negatively affect their (re)integration into the job market. However, in contrast to that of clients with SMI, the relation between symptoms and SE success for clients with PD involved difficult behaviors and their negative impact on the therapeutic relationship.
    UNASSIGNED: In summary, SE practice seems to be undermined by PD and could benefit from adaptations, such as specific training for SE teams to help them in managing clients with this disorder.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究评估了个人安置和支持(IPS)的有效性,参与式工作场所干预(PWI)和IPS+PWI关于工作残疾人的工作参与和健康。
    方法:进行了一项随机对照2×2因子试验,对120名患者进行了18个月的随访。使用对数秩检验和Cox比例风险模型评估了IPS与no-IPS之间以及PWI与no-PWI之间的差异。
    结果:在IPS组中,可持续有偿就业的限制平均生存时间(RMST)为352天,与无IPS组的394相比(HR=1.47,95%CI=0.81-2.63)。在PWI组中,RMST为378天,与无PWI组的367相比(HR=0.89,95%CI=0.48-1.64)。对于次要结果\'开始任何有偿工作,试用位置,IPS组(222天)的RMST显著低于非IPS组(335天;HR=1.85,95%CI=1.01-3.42)。PWI组的心理健康水平明显低于(差)(差异-4.07,95%CI=-7.93至-0.22)。对于所有其他次要结果,差异无统计学意义。
    结论:在IPS和no-IPS开始可持续就业之前,未观察到有统计学意义的差异,在PWI和非PWI之间。开始任何有偿工作之前的持续时间,试用位置,IPS组比无IPS组短,但是进一步的研究应该探索这是否也增加了长期的可持续就业。
    OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the effectiveness of Individual Placement and Support (IPS), Participatory Workplace Intervention (PWI), and IPS + PWI on work participation and health of people with work disabilities.
    METHODS: A randomised controlled 2 × 2 factorial trial with 120 clients and an 18-month follow-up was performed. Differences between IPS and no-IPS and between PWI and no-PWI were assessed using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models.
    RESULTS: In the IPS group, restricted mean survival time (RMST) for sustainable paid employment was 352 days, compared to 394 in the no-IPS group (HR = 1.47, 95% CI = 0.81-2.63). In the PWI group the RMST was 378 days, compared to 367 in the no-PWI group (HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.48-1.64). For the secondary outcome \'starting any paid employment, a trial placement, or education\' RMST was significantly lower for the IPS group (222 days) than for the no-IPS group (335 days; HR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.01-3.42). Mental health was significantly lower (worse) in the PWI group (difference -4.07, 95% CI = -7.93 to -0.22) than in the no-PWI group. For all other secondary outcomes, no statistically significant differences were found.
    CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant differences were observed in the duration until starting sustainable employment between IPS and no-IPS, and between PWI and no-PWI. The duration until starting any paid employment, a trial placement, or education was shorter in the IPS group than in the no-IPS group, but further research should explore whether this also increases sustainable employment in the longer term.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究是对使用个人安置和支持(IPS)和参与式工作场所干预(PWI)来提高工作残疾人的工作参与度的过程评估。我们在随机对照试验(RCT)的同时进行了评估,调查IPS和PWI是否以及在多大程度上按照协议执行。
    方法:研究人群包括有工作障碍的客户,以及他们的工作教练,他们受雇于荷兰一个大城市的市政当局。数据是在2019年9月至2022年11月之间使用登记表收集的,伴随着研究人员的笔记和日志。
    结果:对于IPS,递送剂量是合理的,IPS保真度测量评分是公平的。求职的重点是几乎所有客户的有偿工作,并根据协议中指出的愿望,但就业服务与(健康)护理的整合往往缺乏。被分配到PWI的少数客户接受了干预,通常是因为客户没有在随访期内开始工作,并且需要工作场所才能应用干预措施。
    结论:这项研究的结果表明,IPS的执行是合理的,并且具有公平的保真度,这表明实施足以对RCT的工作参与产生影响。PWI在实践中几乎没有实现,也没有得出关于保真度的结论。因此,我们得出结论,我们不能指望PWI对RCT的工作参与有任何影响。
    OBJECTIVE: This study is a process evaluation of the use of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) and Participatory Workplace Intervention (PWI) to increase the work participation of people with work disabilities. We ran the evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial (RCT), to investigate whether and to what extent IPS and PWI were executed according to protocol.
    METHODS: The study population consisted of clients with work disabilities, and their job coaches who were employed by the municipality of a large city in the Netherlands. Data were collected between September 2019 and November 2022 using registration forms, accompanied by researchers\' notes and logbooks.
    RESULTS: For IPS the dose delivered was reasonable and the IPS fidelity measurement score was fair. The job search focused on paid work for almost all clients and was based on their wishes as indicated in the protocol, but integration of employment services with (health) care was often lacking. A minority of the clients who were assigned to PWI received the intervention, often because the client did not start work within the follow-up period and a workplace was a requirement to apply the intervention.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that IPS was executed reasonably and with a fair fidelity, which indicated implementation was sufficient to find an effect on work participation in the RCT. PWI was barely realized in practice and no conclusions regarding the fidelity could be drawn. We therefore conclude that we cannot expect PWI to have any effect on work participation in the RCT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的三十年里,个人安置和支持(IPS)已成为一种强大的循证方法,可以帮助患有严重精神疾病的人。比如精神分裂症,双相情感障碍,和严重的抑郁症,获得并在有竞争力的就业中取得成功。这篇评论涉及历史,原则,研究,以及IPS的未来发展方向。它涵盖了就业结果的当前证据,成本效益,和非职业成果。它还描述了当前将IPS扩展到新人群的尝试。作者提供了许多涉及严重精神疾病患者的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析的概述。对于解决非职业结果和新人群的研究,审查使用了现有的最佳证据。发表的评论认为,IPS使高收入国家的严重精神疾病患者能够以比接受其他职业干预措施的患者更高的比率在竞争性就业中取得成功。在IPS计划中,实施质量,用标准化的保真度量表测量,与更好的结果相关。就业本身导致收入增加,社会心理结果,临床改善,精神卫生服务使用减少。随着IPS稳步传播到新的人群和新的环境,研究在高收入国家活跃,并缓慢扩散到中等收入国家。IPS是高收入国家严重精神疾病患者的循证实践。它也显示了帮助其他残疾群体的希望,新兴研究旨在阐明适应和结果。
    Over the past three decades, Individual Placement and Support (IPS) has emerged as a robust evidence-based approach to helping people with severe mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression, to obtain and succeed in competitive employment. This review addresses the history, principles, research, and future directions of IPS. It covers current evidence on employment outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and nonvocational outcomes. It also describes current attempts to extend IPS to new populations. The authors provide an overview of numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials involving people with serious mental illness. For studies addressing nonvocational outcomes and new populations, the review uses best available evidence. Published reviews agree that IPS enables patients with serious mental illness in high-income countries to succeed in competitive employment at a higher rate than patients who receive other vocational interventions. Within IPS programs, quality of implementation, measured by standardized fidelity scales, correlates with better outcomes. Employment itself leads to enhanced income, psychosocial outcomes, clinical improvements, and decreased mental health service use. As IPS steadily spreads to new populations and new settings, research is active across high-income countries and spreading slowly to middle-income countries. IPS is an evidence-based practice for people with serious mental illness in high-income countries. It shows promise to help other disability groups also, and emerging research aims to clarify adaptations and outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们向来自两个行业主导的就业计划的33名自闭症成年人询问了他们在这些计划中的经历。这些是公司启动的计划,旨在招募和支持自闭症患者工作。我们还询问了他们的工作场所支持,以及他们认为该计划如何影响了他们的生活。了解这些行业主导的就业计划中人们的经验非常重要,因为这些信息可以帮助改善计划和参与者的经验。在回顾了采访之后,我们发现了5个最能描述员工经历的主题:(1)工作涉及多个工作任务,随着就业环境的变化而发展;(2)工作场所的关系是多样化的,并且受工作参与者所做的工作类型和工作环境的影响;(3)工作场所需要随着自闭症员工学会驾驭他们的工作环境而改变;(4)自闭症员工在工作场所中发展职业认同感,因为他们掌握工作环境对自闭症的发展提供更多我们探讨了两个就业计划的各个方面(例如培训)和计划之外的因素随时间而变化的方式,并为参与者的经验做出了贡献。我们开发了一种新模型来捕获个人和工作场所因素,这些因素有助于参与行业就业计划的自闭症患者的经验。
    UNASSIGNED: We asked 33 autistic adults from two industry-led employment programmes about their experiences in the programmes. These are programmes started by companies to recruit and support autistic people in work. We also asked about their workplace supports, relationships and how they thought the programme had impacted their life. Understanding the experiences of people in these industry-led employment programmes is important as the information can help to improve the programmes and participants\' experiences. After reviewing the interviews, we found five themes that best described the employee\'s experience: (1) working involves multiple job tasks that evolve as the employment context changes; (2) relationships in the workplace are diverse and are influenced by the type of work participants do and the work environment; (3) workplace needs change as the autistic employees learn to navigate their work environment; (4) autistic employees develop a professional identity in the workplace as they master work and feel more integrated in the workplace; and (5) recommendations for the development of supportive workplace environments for autistic people. We explored the way that aspects of the two employment programmes (e.g. training) and factors outside the programme changed with time and contributed to the participant\'s experience. We developed a new model to capture individual and workplace factors that contribute to the experience of autistic people who participate in industry employment programmes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    中国政府于2014年启动了一项试点计划,以实施残疾人就业支持计划。从那以后,已经颁布了促进支持就业的政策。这项研究探讨了从业者如何理解和实施中国残疾人的支持就业。结果发现,非政府服务组织主要在当地残疾人联合会提供的财政支持下实施支持就业;没有政府指南,小规模的民间实践存在许多困难和不稳定因素。结果表明,中国政府应积极建立和完善支持的就业体系,并在政府层面进一步扩大支持的就业实践。
    The Chinese government initiated a pilot program to implement supported employment for people with disabilities in 2014. Since then, policies have been enacted to promote supported employment. This study explored how practitioners understand and implement supported employment for people with disabilities in China. It was found that non-governmental service organizations have mainly implemented supported employment with financial support provided by local disabled persons\' federations; without a governmental guide, the small-scale folk practice presented many difficulties and unstable factors. Results indicated that the Chinese government should actively establish and improve the supported employment system and further expand supported employment practices at the governmental level.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:就业是实现福祉和降低长期社会边缘化和贫困风险的重要来源。对于有酒精和药物成瘾的人,它也可以改善清醒。然而,这一群体的失业状况反映了支持就业的有效干预措施的知识差距。虽然个人安置和支持(IPS)被认为是那些有严重心理健康问题的人的基于证据的支持就业,迄今为止,尚无针对成瘾目标群体的科学证据。目前针对瑞典酒精和药物成瘾的IPS(IPS-ADAS)试验的目的是研究IPS是否对该组的就业产生影响。
    方法:IPS-ADAS试验是一个多位点,务实,平行,单盲,优势随机对照试验(RCT)。参与者(N=330)将被随机分配(1:1),并在成瘾服务(IPSTAU)或传统职业康复(TVR)加TAU(TVRTAU)内照常参加IPS加治疗12个月。将采用意向治疗(ITT)原则。假设是,IPS+TAU参与者的比例显著较大,将用于>1天(主要结果),更快地就业,工作更多的时间和更长的时间,在18个月的随访中,与TVR+TAU参与者相比,收入更高。我们进一步预计,那些受益于IPS+TAU的人将使用更少的酒精和药物,体验更好的健康,使用更少的关心和支持,包括司法系统的支持,与TVR+TAU参与者相比,在6、12和18个月。补充过程评估,使用IPSFidelity量表(25项)和坚持的访谈将解决IPS的交付和接收以及上下文阻碍和共同生产和实施的障碍。工作年龄(18-65岁)愿意工作,失业,参加有关RCT的信息会议,治疗成瘾诊断,并得到福利的财政支持,构成合格标准。
    结论:关于IPS对新的成瘾者目标群体的就业有效性的初步研究将增加国际IPS知识库,并为国家政策提供信息,以将代表性不足的群体纳入工作生活。
    背景:WHO国际临床试验注册平台ISRCTN10492363。2023年8月14日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Employment is a vital source for experiencing well-being and lowering the risk of long-term social marginalisation and poverty. For persons with alcohol and drug addiction, it may also improve sobriety. However, the unemployment situation for this group reflects the knowledge gap in effective interventions to support employment. While Individual Placement and Support (IPS) is recognised as evidence-based supported employment for those with serious mental health problems, no scientific evidence for the target group of addiction exists to date. The aim of the present IPS for Alcohol and Drug Addiction in Sweden (IPS-ADAS) trial is to study whether IPS has an effect on gaining employment for this group.
    METHODS: The IPS-ADAS trial is a multisite, pragmatic, parallel, and single-blinded, superiority randomised controlled trial (RCT). Participants (N = 330) will be randomly assigned (1:1) and participate in IPS plus treatment as usual within Addiction Services (IPS + TAU) or Traditional Vocational Rehabilitation (TVR) available plus TAU (TVR + TAU) for 12 months. The principle of intention-to-treat (ITT) will be applied. The hypothesis is that a significantly larger proportion of IPS + TAU participants will be employed for > 1 day (primary outcome), reach employment sooner, work more hours and longer periods of time, and have a higher income as compared to TVR + TAU participants at 18-month follow-up. We further anticipate that those who benefit from IPS + TAU will use less alcohol and drugs, experience better health, and use less care and support, including support from the justice system, in comparison to TVR + TAU participants, at 6, 12, and 18 months. A supplementary process evaluation, using the IPS Fidelity Scale (25 items) and adhered interviews will address delivery and receipt of the IPS as well as contextual hinders and barriers for coproduction and implementation. Working age (18-65), willingness to work, unemployment, participation in an information meeting about the RCT, treatment for addiction diagnosis, and being financially supported by welfare, constitute eligible criteria.
    CONCLUSIONS: A primary study on the effectiveness of IPS on employment for the new target group of addictions will add to the international IPS knowledge base and inform national policy to include the underrepresented group in working life.
    BACKGROUND: WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ISRCTN10492363. Registered on 14 August 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:有偿就业对智力障碍和/或自闭症患者来说是一个挑战。本文分析了“参与变革”项目提供的工作质量及其与所提供就业的“典型性”的关系。
    方法:收集了384个有偿工作的质量数据,包括工作时间和赚取的工资,并报告了工作中的社会融合。对141名青年的就业经历进行了典型性评估,使用安置问卷典型性指数。
    结果:“参与变革”项目提供了广泛的工作。就业经验的典型性与工作场所的互动没有区别,但是男性和女性的招聘过程存在一些差异。
    结论:工作教练应该确保,尽管工作场所的程序是“非典型的”,结果是每个员工的典型就业经历。
    BACKGROUND: Paid employment represents a challenge for people with an intellectual disability and/or autism. This paper analyses the quality of jobs offered by the Engage to Change project and their relationship to the \'typicalness\' of the employment offered.
    METHODS: Data on the quality of 384 paid jobs were collected, including hours worked and wages earned, and reported social integration at work. The typicalness of the employment experience was assessed for 141 young people, using the Index of Typicalness of Placement Questionnaire.
    RESULTS: The Engage to Change project offered a wide range of jobs. There is no difference in the typicalness of the employment experience in relation to the interactions in the workplace, but there are some differences in the recruitment process for men and women.
    CONCLUSIONS: Job coaches should make sure that, despite the procedures being \'atypical\' for the workplace, the outcome is \'a typical employment experience\' for each employee.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号