Chronic superficial venous disease, including superficial venous insufficiency, superficial venous thrombosis, and aneurysms, are prevalent conditions that affect millions of individuals worldwide. With chronic venous insufficiency specifically, the advent of office-based minimally invasive procedures in recent decades has significantly expanded access to outpatient treatment. However, as venous insufficiency is rarely life- or limb-threatening, the clinical diagnosis, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment indications should be considered carefully when recommending elective intervention. Appropriateness of care guidelines intend to aid providers and patients in the decision-making process, based on the available evidence in the scientific literature, to select the best care for the patient when treating their superficial venous disease.

UNASSIGNED: In previous studies, venous ulcers (VUs) have been found to occur more often in patients with lower socioeconomic status. The aim of this study was to explore if socioeconomic factors influence the delay of referral to a vascular service or the time to healing after superficial venous intervention.
UNASSIGNED: In this prospective study, patients answered a questionnaire about the duration and recurrence of their VU, comorbidities, body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol, social and physical activities, ambulatory status, education, marital status, housing, perceived economic status and dependence on home care. Postoperative complications, VU healing and recurrence were noted one year after superficial venous intervention.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 63 patients were included in this study (30 females and 33 males), with a mean age of 71.2 years (range: 37-92 years). Duration of the present VU in patients was: <3 months in 48%; 3-6 months in 27%; 6-12 months in 11%; and >12 months in 14%. Risk factors for delayed referral were recurrent VU (odds ratio (OR): 4.92; p=0.021); walking impairment (OR: 5.43; p=0.009) and dependence on home care (OR: 4.89: p=0.039) in a univariable analysis. The latter was the only significant finding in a multivariable analysis with socioeconomic risk factor (OR: 4.89; p=0.035). In 85% of patients, their VU healed without recurrence during one year follow-up. Healing took longer if the patients: were of older age (p=0.033); had a normal BMI (independent samples t-test, p=0.028); had a recurrent VU (OR: 5.00; p=0.049); or walking impairment (Fishers exact test, OR: 9.14; p=0.008), but no significant socioeconomic risk factors were found.
UNASSIGNED: In this study, socioeconomic factors were not important risk factors for delayed referral of VU patients to a vascular service or prolonged healing time after superficial venous intervention.
UNASSIGNED: This work was supported by the Scandinavian Research Foundation for Varicose Veins and other Venous Diseases (SFÅV) and by ALF funding from Region Örebro County. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

OBJECTIVE: Endovenous ablation is the standard of care for patients with symptomatic superficial venous insufficiency. For patients with a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), concern exists for an increased risk of postprocedural complications, particularly venous thromboembolism. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovenous thermal ablation in patients with a history of DVT.
METHODS: The national Vascular Quality Initiative Varicose Vein Registry was queried for superficial venous procedures performed from January 2014 to July 2021. Limbs treated with radiofrequency or laser ablation were compared between patients with and without a DVT history. The primary safety end point was incident DVT or endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) II-IV in the treated limb at <3 months of follow-up. The secondary safety end points included any proximal thrombus extension (ie, EHIT I-IV), major bleeding, hematoma, pulmonary embolism, and death due to the procedure. The primary efficacy end point was technical failure (ie, recanalization at <1 week of follow-up). Secondary efficacy end points included the risk of recanalization over time and the postprocedural change in quality-of-life measures. Outcomes stratified by preoperative use of anticoagulation (AC) were also compared among those with prior DVT.
RESULTS: Among 33,892 endovenous thermal ablations performed on 23,572 individual patients aged 13 to 90 years, 1698 patients (7.2%) had a history of DVT. Patients with prior DVT were older (P < .001), had a higher body mass index (P < .001), were more likely to be male at birth (P < .001) and Black/African American (P < .001), and had greater CEAP classifications (P < .001). A history of DVT conferred a higher risk of new DVT (1.4% vs 0.8%; P = .03), proximal thrombus extension (2.3% vs 1.6%; P = .045), and bleeding (0.2% vs 0.04%; P = .03). EHIT II-IV, pulmonary embolism, and hematoma risk did not differ by DVT history (P = NS). No deaths from treatment occurred in either group. Continuing preoperative AC in patients with prior DVT did not change the risk of any complications after endovenous ablation (P = NS) but did confer an increased hematoma risk among all endovenous thermal ablations and surgeries (P = .001). Technical failure was similar between groups (2.0% vs 1.2%; P = .07), although a history of DVT conferred an increased recanalization risk over time (hazard ratio, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.46, 2.46; P < .001). The groups had comparable improvements in postprocedural venous clinical severity scores and Heaviness, Aching, Swelling, Throbbing, and Itching scores (P = NS).
CONCLUSIONS: Endovenous thermal ablation for patients with a history of DVT was effective. However, appropriate patient counseling regarding a heightened DVT risk, albeit still low, is critical. The decision to continue or withhold AC preoperatively should be tailored on a case-by-case basis.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Mechanochemical endovenous ablation (MOCA) was introduced to treat superficial venous insufficiency of the lower leg with less pain and haematoma. Long-term outcome is still lacking. The purpose was to report long-term outcome and to analyse possible predictors for failure.
METHODS: The study was a retrospective pooled analysis of two prospective cohorts previously reported, but with prolonged long-term outcome up to 5-years follow-up.
RESULTS: 163 treated legs were analysed. Mean follow-up was 5.4±0.6 years, in which 33 total failures occurred. Four procedures were partially successful. VCSS improved significantly and remained stable after 1 and 2-years, but significantly rose again after 5-years. AVVQ dropped significantly, but increased after 1 year to 4.3 and 6.1 at 5-years follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: MOCA was effective with minimal pain perioperative. However, anatomical success deteriorated after 1-year and showed even less results after 5-years, mainly due to partly recanalization, while clinical results were less affected. There were no clear clinical predictors for failure.

Incompetent perforator veins are encountered frequently during ultrasound assessment of the venous system in chronic venous disease. Some studies have shown that concomitant treatment of truncal and perforator incompetence improves ulcer healing, yet a Cochrane review was unable to determine the potential benefits of perforator surgery in venous ulcer management due to poor quality evidence. This study aims to establish the exact role of concomitant treatment in patients with chronic venous disease.
A search of online databases including MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane was performed in March 2022. All studies comparing the outcomes of concomitant superficial venous plus perforator surgery with standard therapy were included. Variables assessed included ulcer healing, time to healing, and ulcer recurrence. Disease severity and quality of life, vein occlusion rates, number of incompetent perforator veins on duplex ultrasound post treatment, and reintervention and complication rates were also analyzed. Data were pooled using a random effects model.
Seven studies (872 limbs) were included for analysis. Included studies were of reasonable methodological quality. Ulcer healing rates were similar in each group (relative risk [RR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-1.19; P = .23). Two studies reported no difference in mean time (days) to ulcer healing between groups (mean difference, -14.60; 95% CI, -34.57 to 5.38; P = .15; I2 = 0%; P = .56). Ulcer recurrence was significantly lower in the concomitant group (3.7% vs 44%) (RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07- 0.65; P = .007; I2 = 43%; P = .17). Overall, there was no difference in disease severity measured at 12-month follow-up, with a weighted mean difference between groups of -0.88 (95% CI, -2.05 to 0.29; P = .14; I2 = 84%; P = .002). Quality of life was reported in only one study. The total number of perforator veins identified at follow-up duplex ultrasound was significantly lower in the concomitant group (22.4% vs 89%) compared with standard therapy (RR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.19-0.53; P < .0001; I2 = 88%; P = .0002). There was no difference between groups for occlusion rates of treated great saphenous vein or incompetent perforators (RR, 2.22; 95% CI, 0.10-49.74; P = .61). Reported minor (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.63-1.52; P = .92) and thrombotic complications (RR, 2.04; 95% CI, 0.59-6.99; P = .26) were similar between groups.
Concomitant truncal and perforator surgery is comparable to standard therapy in terms of ulcer healing, safety, and efficacy. Meta-analysis suggests that concomitant treatment could significantly reduce ulcer recurrence rates, but included studies were subject to some biases and short follow-up. Concomitant treatment may be considered to prevent recurrence rather than improve ulcer healing.

Many patients will present with chronic proximal venous outflow obstruction (PVOO) and superficial venous insufficiency (SVI) at the time of iliac vein stenting. In the present study, we aimed to determine whether differences in outcomes were present for patients receiving an iliac vein stent according to whether concurrent SVI was present.
A registry of 553 patients who had undergone iliac vein stent placement for chronic PVOO from 2011 to 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. Two groups of patients were followed for ≤6 years after initial vein stent placement: group 1 (n = 178; 32.2%) had not had SVI before or after stent placement and group 2 (n = 375; 67.8%) had had SVI at initial iliac vein stent procedure. The patients\' symptoms were evaluated using the venous clinical severity score (VCSS). Postoperative procedures after initial stent placement were recorded. Postoperative procedures included any operation performed after the index iliac vein stent procedure. Endovenous thermal ablation was classified as a minor postoperative procedure, and any intervention with venography was classified as a major postoperative reintervention. Multivariate regression models were used to determine the odds of a major reintervention or minor procedure postoperatively.
Across the two groups, the mean age (group 1, 65.3 years; group 2, 59.9 years; P < .001), body mass index (27.6 vs 26.1 kg/m2; P = .004), diabetes (32.6% vs 17.6%; P < .001), arterial hypertension (68.5% vs 42.1%; P < .001), and coronary artery disease (16.9% vs 9.6%; P = .048) differed significantly. The time to follow-up was similar between the two groups (P = .915). Longitudinally, both groups had had similar improvements in the composite VCSSs. After multivariable adjustment, group 2 was more likely than group 1 (odds ratio, 5.26; 95% confidence interval, 3.33-8.59; P < .001) to have required a postoperative minor procedure, but not a major reintervention. Group 2 had also averaged a shorter interval from the index procedure to a postoperative procedure than group 1 (525.7 days vs 258.1 days; P < .001).
Compared with patients without SVI, those with SVI and chronic PVOO were younger, had had fewer comorbidities, and fared similarly in the change in the composite VCSSs but were more likely to have required a minor procedure and less likely to have required a major reintervention after the index iliac vein stent procedure.

OBJECTIVE: Endovenous Radio-frequency Ablation (RFA) has become a common treatment for chronic venous insufficiency. The Medtronic® Closurefast catheter was previously the only RFA catheter approved for use in this procedure. In 2018 VenClose® Company\'s new device was approved. As there has been little literature on this new device, we examined our results with this new alternative.
METHODS: Patients with symptomatic venous insufficiency had their lower extremities mapped via ultrasound. If superficial reflux (>.5 s) was found the patients were recommended a 6-week conservative course of compression stockings, elevation, and NSAIDs. If conservative treatment failed, the patient was scheduled for an RFA. The procedure was done at the outpatient clinic, instructions were given to return for follow-up in 3-5 days, and every 3 months thereafter for the first year. 1032 procedures were performed over 14 months.
RESULTS: We had 503 patients, 69% female, mean age 54 ± 12. Under the CEAP system, clinical manifestation portion, the majority of our limbs were class C3 and class C4. The majority of veins closed were GSV above knee and SSV. Follow-up duration ranged from 1 to 276 days (Mean (M) = 10 SD: 20 days). Our success rate was 99.32% at initial follow-up. We observed EHITs in 12 cases (1.16%), 8 of which were class I, 2 of which were class II, and 2 of which were class III. We noted SVTs of proximal varicose veins in 40 cases (3.88%) and SVT of distal GSV in 4 cases (.38%). There were 4 (.38%) cases of DVT, 3 in calf muscular veins (.29%), and one in a perforator vein (.09%). We observed two cases of puncture abscess (.193%), 8 cases of infection at the puncture site (.77%), with 8 infections occurring at locations other than the puncture site and not as a result of the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results indicate that this new machine and catheter are promising with low rates of EHIT, recanalizations, and other complications. It is important to research this catheter and further studies should continue to follow up to examine recanalization rates over a more long-term follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the postoperative pain and midterm results of patients undergoing internal perivenous compression with internal compression therapy (ICT) for venous insufficiency at the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ).
METHODS: Patients managed with ICT between April and October 2019 for grade 4 venous reflux at the SFJ were retrospectively evaluated. The venous clinical severity score (VCSS) was calculated preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Postoperative pain was assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS). Control Doppler ultrasound imaging was performed 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Forty-five patients [14 (31%) males and 31 (69%) females; mean age, 47 ± 13 years] were included. The median preoperative VCSS was 7 (5-8.5). The median VCSS at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively was 6 (4-7.5), 4 (3-5.5), and 3 (2-4), respectively, and these values were significantly lower than the preoperative score (p = 0,001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). The postoperative VAS score was 0 in 6 patients (13%), 1 in 17 patients (38%), 2 in 6 patients (13%), 3 in 15 patients (33%), and 4 in 1 patient (2%). At 6 months, reflux was absent in 9 (20%), grade 1 in 20 (44%), and grade 2 in 16 (36%) patients. A vena saphena magna diameter of >6.7 mm predicted grade >1 reflux at 6 months [87.5%, with an area under the curve of 0.78 (p < 0.001)]. No complications occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: ICT alleviated symptoms and reduced reflux grade in patients with venous insufficiency at the SFJ. This therapy can be applied with satisfactory patient comfort.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the unintended incidents that led to patient injuries (PIs) in the treatment of superficial venous insufficiency (SVI).
METHODS: PI claims filed with the Finnish Patient Insurance Centre between 2004 and 2017 involving SVI were reviewed. Factors contributing to PI were identified and classified.
RESULTS: Eighteen (13.2%) of 136 compensated PIs in the specialty of vascular surgery were related to SVI. Only 4.7% of 383 SVI claims were compensated. The incidence of PIs was 9.9 per 100 000 patients. Fifteen patients had open surgery (83.3%) and three (16.7%) endovenous treatment. Two (11.1%) patients had necrotising fasciitis, four (22.1%) had deep vein injuries and two (11.1%) had a permanent nerve injury. Two (11.1%) patients had retained endovenous material that required surgical removal.
CONCLUSIONS: PIs were identifiable during all stages of care, perioperative injuries related to open surgery being the most common.