suction

吸力
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景技术尖端柔性吸引输尿管通路鞘(TFS-UAS)可以在柔性输尿管镜下弯曲,这有利于通过冲洗和抽吸作用去除肾结石段。小规模的比较研究发现它比传统的UAS更安全,更有效。然而,TFS-UAS联合数字FURS治疗后未发现肾脓肿等并发症.病例报告一名57岁女性右侧腰部疼痛持续1年。普通计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描显示多发肾盂结石(最大直径20×9mm)。她接受了TFS-UAS联合数字输尿管软镜碎石术的择期手术。认为手术成功,出院前给予术后抗生素治疗2天。术后8天后,她因高烧(39.6°C)而被送往急诊科。平扫CT显示双J支架完整,未见异常。她再次进入泌尿科接受抗生素治疗,进展为感染性休克(血压80/50mmHg),需要立即转移到重症监护病房。对比增强CT显示右肾脓肿。她迅速复苏,并给予更强的抗生素。她恢复良好,并通过2周口服左氧氟沙星治疗出院。随访超声未见肾脓肿。结论虽然带数字FURs的TFS-UAS是治疗多发性肾结石的有效方法,术后有肾脓肿的风险,可能是由于肾内压力改变.
    BACKGROUND The tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath (TFS-UAS) can be bent under flexible ureteroscopes, which facilitates removal of renal stone segments by irrigation and suctioning effects. Small-scale comparative studies found it safer and more efficacious than traditional UAS. However, complications such as renal abscess were not documented after TFS-UAS combined with digital FURS. CASE REPORT A 57-year-old woman had right lumbar pain that persisted for 1 year. A plain computed tomography (CT) scan revealed multiple renal pelvicalyceal stones (maximum diameter 20×9 mm). She was admitted to undergo elective surgery with a TFS-UAS combined with digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The operation was deemed successful and she was given postoperative antibiotics for 2 days before discharge. Eight postoperative days later, she was admitted to the emergency department due to high fever (39.6°C). Plain CT revealed intact double-J stents and no abnormalities. She was readmitted to the urological department to receive antibiotic therapy, which progressed to septic shock (blood pressure 80/50 mmHg) and required immediate transfer to the intensive care unit. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed a right renal abscess. She was promptly resuscitated and given stronger antibiotics. She recovered well and was discharged with 2-week oral levofloxacin treatment. Follow-up ultrasound found no renal abscess. CONCLUSIONS While TFS-UAS with digital FURs is an effective approach for multiple renal stones, there is a risk of postoperative renal abscess, possibly due to altered intrarenal pressure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:报告我们在输尿管上段或肾结石中使用11/13Fr吸引输尿管入路鞘(UAS)和8.55Fr一次性数字输尿管软镜(SDFU)进行一期输尿管软镜碎石(FURL)的初步经验。
    方法:我们回顾性收集了2022年1月至2024年4月的900例成人输尿管上段或肾结石患者的临床资料。人口统计,评估围手术期和术后结局.
    结果:总而言之,940例中的40例(4.26%)由于输尿管狭窄而未能引入UAS并需要第二阶段FURL,因此被排除在外。其余900例合格病例的平均结石最大直径为1.68±0.58cm。输尿管上段结石228例,肾结石456例,合并输尿管和肾结石216例。平均手术时间为52.20±20.21min,术后住院时间为2.87±1.37d。术后1个月的结石清除率为89.56%,只有2.44%的残留物患者进行了再次手术。术后发热率,术后需要镇痛的疼痛和轻微的输尿管粘膜损伤占5.11%,8.22%和7.78%,分别。没有患者出现严重的并发症,如败血症或输尿管穿孔。
    结论:对于绝大多数成年患者来说,在没有术前支架的情况下,以11/13Fr吸引UAS的单次治疗中接受FURL是实用且适用的。FURL与11/13Fr抽吸UAS和8.55FrSDFU是可行的,可靠,安全,有效治疗肾结石和输尿管上段结石。
    OBJECTIVE: To report our initial experience of one-stage flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy(FURL) with 11/13Fr suctioning ureteral access sheath(UAS) and 8.55Fr single-use digital flexible ureteroscope(SDFU) in upper ureteral or renal calculi.
    METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 900 adult patients with upper ureteral or renal calculi treated by FURL with 11/13Fr suctioning UAS and 8.55Fr SDFU from January 2022 to April 2024. Demographics, peri- and postoperative outcomes were assessed.
    RESULTS: In all, 40 of 940 cases(4.26%) failed to introduce UAS and required second-stage FURL because of ureterostenosis and were excluded. Mean stones size of the remaining 900 eligible cases was 1.68 ± 0.58 cm in greatest diameter. There were 228 cases of upper ureteral stone, 456 cases of renal stone and 216 cases of concomitant ureteral and renal calculi. The mean operation time was 52.20 ± 20.21 min and the postoperative hospital stay was 2.87 ± 1.37 days. The stone-free rate of 1 month postoperatively was 89.56% and only 2.44% of patients with residue underwent additional reoperation. The rate of postoperative fever, postoperative pain needing analgesic and slight ureteral mucosal injury were 5.11%, 8.22% and 7.78%, respectively. None of patient suffered from severe complications, such as sepsis or ureteral perforation.
    CONCLUSIONS: It\'s practical and suitable for the vast majority of adult patients to undergo FURL in single session with 11/13Fr suctioning UAS without preoperative stenting. FURL with 11/13Fr suctioning UAS and 8.55Fr SDFU is feasible, reliable, safe, and efficient in the management of renal stone and upper ureteral stone.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:描述和评估用于去除保留的晶状体材料(RLM)的新型平坦部玻璃体切除术(PPV)技术的可行性,这消除了对20号玻璃体内碎裂或全氟化碳辅助抬高的需要。
    方法:介入病例系列。经过彻底的23号PPV,使用抽吸将硬晶状体材料接合并保持粘附在玻璃体切割器上,然后上升到前房。在那里,标准的超声乳化探头,通过角膜切口插入,用于分割和移除材料。
    结果:对3例患者的3只眼进行了手术。在所有的眼睛,RLM可以完全删除。术后,3只眼睛中有2只(67%)达到了20/20的最佳矫正视力。无青光眼等并发症,黄斑囊样水肿,角膜水肿,或记录视网膜脱离。术中,在3只眼中的2只(67%)中检测到视网膜撕裂,并接受了眼内激光视网膜固定术和气液交换治疗。一只眼睛随后出现黄斑裂孔,需要进一步手术。
    结论:在PPV期间,抽吸辅助晶状体抬高可能是一种可行且方便的去除RLM的技术。尽管与其他方法的比较超出了本初步研究的范围,视觉结局和并发症发生率令人鼓舞,应在更大的患者组中进行验证.
    OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the feasibility of a novel pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) technique for the removal of retained lens material (RLM), which obviates the need for either 20-gauge intravitreal fragmentation or perfluorocarbon-assisted elevation.
    METHODS: Interventional case series. After thorough 23-gauge PPV, the hard lens material is engaged and held adherent to the vitreous cutter using aspiration, then raised into the anterior chamber. There, a standard phacoemulsification probe, inserted through a corneal incision, is used to fragment and remove the material.
    RESULTS: Three eyes of 3 patients were operated on. In all eyes, RLM could be removed completely. Postoperatively, 2 of 3 eyes (67%) achieved 20/20 best-corrected visual acuity. No complications such as glaucoma, cystoid macular edema, corneal edema, or retinal detachments were recorded. Intraoperatively, retinal tears were detected in 2 of 3 (67%) eyes and treated with endolaser retinopexy and fluid-air exchange. One eye subsequently developed macular hole requiring further surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: Suction-assisted lens elevation may be a viable and convenient technique to remove RLM during PPV. Although the comparison with other methods is beyond the scope of this preliminary study, visual outcomes and complication rates were encouraging and should be validated in a larger group of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:已经描述了三种用于抽吸支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)液的技术,即壁挂式吸力(WMS),手动抽吸(MS),和手动吸油管(MST)。然而,3种方法之间没有直接比较。
    方法:我们将接受柔性支气管镜和BAL的患者以1:1:1的比例随机分配到3个组中的一个。主要结果是比较最佳产量,定义为至少30%的体积滴注和<5%的支气管细胞。关键的次要结果是BAL的体积和总量(以毫米为单位)返回的百分比,以及并发症(低氧血症,气道出血,和其他人)。
    结果:我们随机分配了942例患者[MST(n=314),MS(n=314),WMS(n=314)]。研究人群的平均年龄[58.7%(n=553)男性]为46.9岁。BAL最常见的适应症是疑似肺部感染。右上叶和中叶是最常见的采样叶。所有组的最佳产量相似[MST(35.6%)vsMS(42.2%)vsWMS(36.5%);P=0.27]。WMS(54.2%)和MS(54%)中BALF恢复>30%(P=0.005)的患者比例明显高于MST组(42.9%)。WMS和MS中BALF的绝对体积和百分比体积也高于MST臂。两组的并发症发生率或其他次要结局没有差异。
    结论:我们发现使用3种方法中的任何一种进行BAL液体回收,BAL的最佳产量或并发症没有差异。
    BACKGROUND: Three techniques have been described for aspirating the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, namely the wall mount suction (WMS), manual suction (MS), and manual suction with tubing (MST). However, there is no direct comparison among the 3 methods.
    METHODS: We randomized patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy and BAL in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of the 3 arms. The primary outcome was to compare the optimal yield, defined as at least 30% return of volume instilled and <5% bronchial cells. The key secondary outcomes were the percentage of volume and total amount (in millimeters) return of BAL, as well as complications (hypoxemia, airway bleeding, and others).
    RESULTS: We randomized 942 patients [MST (n = 314), MS (n = 314), WMS (n = 314)]. The mean age of the study population [58.7% (n = 553) males] was 46.9 years. The most common indication for BAL was suspected pulmonary infection. Right upper lobes and middle lobes were the commonest sampled lobes. The optimal yield was similar in all the groups [MST (35.6%) vs MS (42.2%) vs WMS (36.5%); P = 0.27]. A significantly higher proportion of patients had BALF return >30% (P = 0.005) in the WMS (54.2%) and MS (54%) than in the MST arm (42.9%). The absolute and the percentage volume of BALF was also higher in WMS and MS than in the MST arm. There was no difference in the complication rate or other secondary outcomes across the groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in the optimal yield of BAL or complications using any one of the 3 methods for BAL fluid retrieval.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    逆行肾内手术(RIRS)是上尿路结石的主要治疗方法。输尿管进入鞘(UAS)作为补充工具,促进RIRS期间直接进入肾脏。缺乏将尖端可弯曲吸引输尿管入路鞘(S-UAS)与RIRS中的传统UAS进行比较以治疗肾和输尿管结石的高质量证据。该研究的目的是比较S-UAS与传统UAS在RIRS中治疗≤30mm的肾脏或输尿管结石的疗效和安全性。
    国际,多中心,优势随机对照试验纳入了中国8个医疗中心的320名意向治疗患者,菲律宾,马来西亚和土耳其从2023年8月到2024年2月。纳入标准为≥18岁的肾结石或输尿管结石≤30mm的患者。使用S-UAS或传统UAS进行RIRS。主要结果是立即无石率(SFR)。次要结果包括术后3个月SFR,操作时间,住院,辅助程序,并发症(使用Clavien-Dindo分级系统),和生活质量(QoL)评分的改善。提供了比例[风险差异(RD)]/均值[平均差(MD)]和95%置信区间(CI)之间的差异。本研究在ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT05952635注册。
    与传统UAS组相比,S-UAS组表现出明显更高的立即SFR(81.3%对49.4%;RD31.9%;95%CI22.5%-41.7%;p=0.004),由单边优势测试确定。此外,S-UAS组在术后3个月表现出更高的SFR(87.5%对70.0%;RD17.5%;95%CI8.7%-26.3%;p<0.001),术后发热率降低(RD-11.9%;95%CI-18.7%至-4.9%;p<0.001),减少石篮的使用(RD-70.6%;95%CI-77.8%至-63.5%;p<0.001),和更好的QoL改善(MD7.25;95%CI2.21-12.29;p=0.005)。手术时间差异无统计学意义,住院,或需要第二阶段RIRS。
    在上尿路结石≤30mm的RIRS中,与传统UAS相比,S-UAS表现出卓越的性能,显示更高的SFR,术后发热率降低,并改善QoL结果。S-UAS成为RIRS传统UAS的审慎和有利的替代方案。
    国家自然科学基金和广东省,和浙江省医药卫生计划。
    UNASSIGNED: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is the main treatments for upper urinary tract stones. The Ureteral Access Sheath (UAS) serves as a supplementary tool, facilitating direct kidney access during RIRS. High quality of evidence comparing tip bendable suction ureteral access sheath (S-UAS) with traditional UAS in RIRS for the treatment of renal and ureteral stones is lacking. The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of S-UAS with traditional UAS in RIRS for the treatment of renal or ureteral stones ≤30 mm.
    UNASSIGNED: An international, multicenter, and superiority randomized controlled trial included 320 intention-to-treat patients across 8 medical centers in China, the Philippines, Malaysia and Turkey from August 2023 to February 2024. The inclusion criteria were patients ≥18 years old with renal or ureteral stones ≤30 mm. RIRS was performed using either S-UAS or traditional UAS. The primary outcome was the immediately stone-free rate (SFR). Secondary outcomes included SFR 3 months after operation, operating time, hospital stay, auxiliary procedures, complications (using the Clavien-Dindo grading system), and improvement in the Quality of Life (QoL) score. Differences between proportions [risk difference (RD)]/means [mean difference (MD)] and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were presented. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05952635.
    UNASSIGNED: The S-UAS group demonstrated a significantly higher immediately SFR (81.3% versus 49.4%; RD 31.9%; 95% CI 22.5%-41.7%; p = 0.004) compared to the traditional UAS group, as determined by the one-side superiority test. Additionally, the S-UAS group exhibited a higher SFR at 3 months post-operation (87.5% versus 70.0%; RD 17.5%; 95% CI 8.7%-26.3%; p < 0.001), lower postoperative fever rate (RD -11.9%; 95% CI -18.7% to -4.9%; p < 0.001), reduced use of stone baskets (RD -70.6%; 95% CI -77.8% to -63.5%; p < 0.001), and better QoL improvement (MD 7.25; 95% CI 2.21-12.29; p = 0.005). No statistically significant differences were observed in operation time, hospital stay, or the need for second-stage RIRS.
    UNASSIGNED: In RIRS for upper urinary tract stones ≤30 mm, S-UAS exhibited superior performance compared to traditional UAS, demonstrating higher SFR, reduced postoperative fever rate, and improved QoL outcomes. S-UAS emerges as a prudent and advantageous alternative to traditional UAS for RIRS.
    UNASSIGNED: National Natural Science Foundation of China and Guangdong Province, and Zhejiang Medicine and Health Program.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:基于植入物的乳房重建后,手术部位感染(SSIs)仍然是一个问题,尽管采取了预防措施。这些感染可能会产生严重的后果。这项研究评估了该患者人群中引流尖端培养结果与SSI之间的相关性。
    方法:我们分析了2021年7月至2023年5月期间接受基于植入物的乳房重建的患者的数据。收集排水尖端培养物,并记录了手术后一个月内发生的任何SSIs。然后,我们将临床数据与培养结果进行了比较。
    结果:共纳入263种引流尖端培养物。值得注意的是,接受组织扩张器摘除和植入的61例患者中,无1例培养阳性.然而,在接受组织扩张器或直接植入手术的202名患者中,11人(5.45%)有阳性培养,总共确定了12个SSI。重要的是,11个培养阳性伤口中有5个出现了SSIs。多变量分析显示,感染与引流尖端培养阳性之间存在显着的双向关联。对于金黄色葡萄球菌(S。金黄色葡萄球菌)特别是,引流尖端培养显示出优异的预测价值:灵敏度(33.33%),特异性(100%),阳性预测值(100%),阴性预测值(95.96%)。
    结论:即刻植入乳房重建的引流尖端培养与SSI显著相关。密切监测至关重要,特别是当在培养物中鉴定出金黄色葡萄球菌时。
    OBJECTIVE: Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain a concern after implant-based breast reconstruction, despite preventive measures. These infections can have serious consequences. This study evaluated the correlation between drain tip culture results and SSIs in this patient population.
    METHODS: We analyzed data from patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction between July 2021 and May 2023. Drain tip cultures were collected, and any SSIs occurring within one month of surgery were documented. We then compared clinical data with the culture results.
    RESULTS: A total of 263 drain tip cultures were included. Notably, none of the 61 patients who underwent tissue expander removal and implant insertion had positive cultures. However, among the 202 patients who received tissue expanders or direct-to-implant procedures, 11 (5.45%) had positive cultures, with a total of 12 SSIs identified. Importantly, five of the 11 culture-positive wounds developed SSIs. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant two-way association between infection and positive drain tip cultures. For Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) specifically, drain tip cultures showed excellent predictive value: sensitivity (33.33%), specificity (100%), positive predictive value (100%), and negative predictive value (95.96%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Drain tip cultures from immediate implant-based breast reconstructions significantly correlated with SSIs. Close monitoring is crucial, especially when S. aureus is identified in the culture.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    尽管在过去几年中越来越多的证据表明,在急性中风大血管闭塞患者中,使用大口径远端进入导管作为一种机械血栓切除术的直接血栓抽吸术的有效性和安全性,该技术在血管内动脉瘤治疗中管理血栓栓塞并发症的经验和证据仍然有限,关于该主题的研究很少.我们介绍了一个大型且梭形的左颈内动脉瘤术前血管造影期间左大脑中动脉血栓栓塞性闭塞的病例。通过在流动转向支架打开期间导航旨在支撑的已经放置的远端进入导管,成功地控制了这种并发症;因此,人工抽吸血栓两分钟,脑梗死溶栓(TICI)评分3级血流恢复。这种情况应该鼓励使用远端进入导管,已经进行动脉瘤治疗,进行零延迟直接血栓抽吸作为血管内治疗期间血栓栓塞并发症的抢救方法。
    Despite growing evidence over the last few years of the efficacy and safety of direct thrombus aspiration using a large bore distal access catheter as a type of mechanical thrombectomy procedure in acute stroke large-vessel occlusion patients, the experience and evidence of this technique for managing thromboembolic complications in endovascular aneurysm treatment is still limited and little research is available regarding this topic. We present a case of a thromboembolic occlusion of the left middle cerebral artery during the preprocedural angiograms of a large and fusiform left internal carotid artery aneurysm. This complication was successfully managed by navigating an already-placed distal access catheter intended for support during the opening of the flow-diverting stent; therefore, the thrombus was manually aspirated for two minutes, and Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) scale 3 flow was restored. This case should encourage the use of a distal access catheter, already placed for aneurysm treatment, to perform zero-delay direct thrombus aspiration as a rescue approach for thromboembolic complications during endovascular treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着全球社会开始从COVID-19大流行中恢复,其后果带来的挑战依然存在。这一健康危机凸显了与空气传播病原体及其快速传播能力相关的挑战。虽然已经出现了许多解决方案来应对这一挑战,很少有设备是廉价的,易于制造,和多才多艺的各种设置。
    方法:本文提出了一种新颖的抽吸装置,旨在抵消气溶胶和液滴的扩散,具有成本效益并适应各种环境。我们还进行了一项实验研究,以评估使用人工咳嗽发生器的设备的有效性,一个粒子计数器,和一个孤立系统中的人体模型。我们用模拟的单次和重复咳嗽事件测量了液滴去除率。此外,在四个不同的区域进行测量,以比较其对直接羽流和间接颗粒去除的有效性。
    结果:该设备降低了空气传播疾病的风险,其将气溶胶体积的半衰期从23.6分钟降低到15.6分钟的能力证明了这一点,有效捕获气溶胶大小的液滴,以其延长的空气传播持久性而闻名。抽吸装置从峰值计数减少了峰值总液滴体积。在峰值液滴计数后22分钟,没有抽吸装置的计数下降了24%,有抽吸装置的计数下降了43%。
    结论:实验结果证实了抽吸装置有效地从环境中去除液滴的能力,使其成为提高室内空气质量的重要工具。考虑到抽吸装置的持续性能,无论单个或多个咳嗽事件,这证明了其在降低空气传播疾病风险方面的潜在效用.用于制造的3D打印打开了快速迭代设计过程的可能性,不同配置的灵活性,以及为未来的流行病快速全球部署。
    BACKGROUND: As the global community begins recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic, the challenges due to its aftermath remain. This health crisis has highlighted challenges associated with airborne pathogens and their capacity for rapid transmission. While many solutions have emerged to tackle this challenge, very few devices exist that are inexpensive, easy to manufacture, and versatile enough for various settings.
    METHODS: This paper presents a novel suction device designed to counteract the spread of aerosols and droplets and be cost-effective and adaptable to diverse environments. We also conducted an experimental study to evaluate the device\'s effectiveness using an artificial cough generator, a particle counter, and a mannequin in an isolated system. We measured droplet removal rates with simulated single and repeated cough incidents. Also, measurements were taken at four distinct areas to compare its effectiveness on direct plume versus indirect particle removal.
    RESULTS: The device reduced airborne disease transmission risk, as evidenced by its capacity to decrease the half-life of aerosol volume from 23.6 minutes to 15.6 minutes, effectively capturing aerosol-sized droplets known for their extended airborne persistence. The suction device lessened the peak total droplet volume from peak counts. At 22 minutes post peak droplet count, the count had dropped 24% without the suction device and 43% with the suction device.
    CONCLUSIONS: The experiment\'s findings confirm the suction device\'s capability to effectively remove droplets from the environment, making it a vital tool in enhancing indoor air quality. Given the sustained performance of the suction device irrespective of single or multiple cough events, this demonstrates its potential utility in reducing the risk of airborne disease transmission. 3D printing for fabrication opens the possibility of a rapid iterative design process, flexibility for different configurations, and rapid global deployment for future pandemics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    术中突然通气失败的准确诊断和最佳管理对儿童至关重要。在这里,我们报道了一例新生儿在出生后立即通过剖宫产进行起搏器植入术的病例.气阴引起部分气管阻塞,并在气管导管抽吸过程中移位,导致气管导管完全阻塞。气管导管阻塞的诊断具有挑战性,因为阻塞发生在气道抽吸后立即发生,这是为了排除气管导管阻塞。麻醉医师必须在新生儿气道吸气后立即考虑高黏度的呼吸道阻塞。
    Accurate diagnosis and optimal management of sudden intraoperative ventilatory failure is crucial in children. Herein, we report the case of a newborn who underwent pacemaker implantation immediately after birth via cesarean delivery. The vernix caseosa caused a partial tracheal obstruction and was dislodged during tracheal tube suctioning, leading to complete obstruction of the tracheal tube. Diagnosis of tracheal tube obstruction was challenging because the obstruction occurred immediately after airway suctioning, which is performed to rule out tracheal tube obstruction. Anesthesiologists must consider airway obstruction from high-viscosity vernix caseosa as a possibility immediately after airway suctioning in newborns.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号