UNASSIGNED: Posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (PSTA) is commonly done to treat refractory cases of macular edema. Complications may arise from the procedure as well as from the use of the periocular steroid medications. Side effects include subconjunctival hemorrhage, progression of cataract, scleral perforation (resulting in subretinal, subhyaloid, or intravitreal injection of the drug), retinal detachment, ptosis, orbital fat prolapse, orbital abscess, infectious scleritis, ocular hypertension, and scleral abscess. Here we describe a case of inadvertent subretinal triamcinolone acetonide (TA) deposition from a PSTA procedure without any adverse vision-threatening outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: We report a patient who presented with a history of superior temporal left eye macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, which was successfully repaired with a scleral buckle (SB), pars plana vitrectomy, and gas placement. Due to persistent diplopia, the SB was removed after 1 year post-operatively. Due to the development of cystoid macular edema, a PSTA was performed after the patient failed topical steroids and NSAIDs. The procedure was halted early due to unexpected resistance during the injection. A dilated fundus exam showed the presence of subretinal triamcinolone acetonide. The patient was observed and found to have no complications with almost complete resolution of the triamcinolone acetonide after 3 months.
UNASSIGNED: In previous SB patients, it is important to highlight the risk of globe penetration, subretinal deposition of TA, formation of retinal breaks, or reopening of prior retinal breaks with posterior subtenon injection, which could have adverse effects on the local retina as well as the risk of retinal detachment.

Subretinal injection (SI) is a novel drug delivery method, directly to retina for treatment of various eye disease. However, manual injection requires surgical experience and precision due to physiological factors. Robots offer solution to this issue, by reducing hand tremor and increased accuracy. This systematic review analyzes current status on robot-assisted SI compared to conventional techniques. Systematic search across 5 databases was conducted to identify studies comparing manual and robot-assisted SI procedures. Extracted data included robotic systems, complications, and success rates. Four studies, including one human trial, two ex vivo porcine eye studies, and one artificial eye model study were included in the synthesis. The findings show early advantages of robot-assisted SI. Compared to traditional interventions, robot procedures result in reduced tremor, what potentially lowers the risk of complications, including retinal tears and reflux. The first in-human randomized trial showed encouraging results, with no significant differences in surgical times or complications between robot-assisted and manual SI. However, major limitation of robot-assisted procedures is longer procedure time. Robot-assisted SI holds promise by offering increased precision and stability, reducing human error and potentially improving clinical outcomes. Challenges include cost, availability, and learning curve. Overall, early stage of robot-assisted SI suggests advantages in precision, complication reduction, and potentially improved drug delivery. Further research in human randomized trials is needed to fully assess its full-scale clinical application.

Subretinal injection is the preferred delivery technique for various novel ocular therapies and is widely used because of its precision and efficient delivery of gene and cell therapies; however, choosing an injection point and defining delivery parameters to target a specified retinal location and area is an inexact science. We provide an overview of the key factors that play important roles during subretinal injections to refine the technique, enhance patient outcomes, and minimise risks. We describe the role of anatomical and physical variables that affect subretinal bleb propagation and shape and their impact on retinal integrity. We highlight the risks associated with subretinal injections and consider strategies to mitigate reflux and retinal trauma. Finally, we explore the emerging field of robotic assistance in improving intraocular manouvrability and precision to facilitate the injection procedure.

Subretinal injections are not commonly performed during clinical treatment of animals but are frequently used in laboratory animal models to assess therapeutic efficacy and safety of gene and cell therapy products. Veterinary ophthalmologists are often employed to perform the injections in the laboratory animal setting, due to knowledge of comparative ocular anatomy between species and familiarity with operating on non-human eyes. Understanding the different approaches used for subretinal injection in each species and potential complications that may be encountered is vital to achieving successful and reproducible results. This manuscript provides a summary of different approaches to subretinal injections in the most common animal model species, along with information from published literature and experience of the authors to educate novice or experienced surgeons tasked with performing these injections for the first time.

UNASSIGNED: To assess the safety and feasibility of direct vitrectomy-sparing subretinal injection for gene delivery in a large animal model.
UNASSIGNED: The experimental Liběchov minipigs were used for subretinal delivery of a plasmid DNA vector (pS/MAR-CMV-copGFP) with cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter, green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter (copGFP) and a scaffold/matrix attachment region (S/MAR) sequence. The eyes were randomized to subretinal injection of the vector following pars plana vitrectomy (control group) or a direct injection without prior vitrectomy surgery (experimental group). Intra- and post-operative observations up to 30 days after surgery were compared.
UNASSIGNED: Six eyes of three mini-pigs underwent surgery for delivery into the subretinal space. Two eyes in the control group were operated with a classical approach (lens-sparing vitrectomy and posterior hyaloid detachment). The other four eyes in the experimental group were injected directly with a subretinal cannula without vitrectomy surgery. No adverse events, such as endophthalmitis, retinal detachment and intraocular pressure elevation were observed post-operatively. The eyes in the experimental group had both shorter surgical time and recovery while achieving the same surgical goal.
UNASSIGNED: This pilot study demonstrates that successful subretinal delivery of gene therapy vectors is achievable using a direct injection without prior vitrectomy surgery.

The purpose of this study was to compare the retention rate of Adeno-associated viral vector (AAV) gene therapy agents within different subretinal injection systems. The retention of AAV serotype 2-based voretigene neparvovec (VN) and a clinical-grade AAV serotype 8 vector within four different subretinal cannulas from two different manufacturers was quantified. A standardized qPCR using the universal inverted terminal repeats as a target sequence was developed. The instruments compared were the PolyTip® cannula 25 g/38 g by MedOne Surgical, Inc., Sarasota, FL, USA, and three different subretinal injection needles by DORC, Zuidland, The Netherlands (1270.EXT Extendible 41G subretinal injection needle (23G), DORC 1270.06 23G Dual bore injection cannula, DORC 27G Subretinal injection cannula). The retention rate of VN and within the DORC products (10-28%) was comparable to the retention rate (32%) found for the PolyTip® cannula that is mentioned in the FDA-approved prescribing information for VN. For the AAV8 vector, the PolyTip® cannula showed a retention rate of 14%, and a similar retention rate of 3-16% was found for the DORC products (test-retest variability: mean 4.5%, range 2.5-20.2%). As all the instruments tested showed comparable retention rates, they seem to be equally compatible with AAV2- and AAV8-based gene therapy agents.

The standard of care to treat small- and medium-sized macular holes (<400 µm diameter) consists of a conventional transconjunctival sutureless pars plana vitrectomy followed by ILM peeling and endotamponade, mainly with gas or in some cases with silicone oil, resulting in closure rates of over 90% and good functional results. Large (>400 µm diameter), chronic and persistent macular holes remain a surgical challenge since closure rates and functional results decrease with larger macular hole diameters. Various modifications of the conventional surgical technique were introduced to improve anatomic and functional success in refractory cases not suitable for conventional macular hole surgery. These techniques comprise the positioning of tissue at the top of the hole to improve closure as performed by an inner limiting membrane flap and free flap preparation or the transplantation of autologous retinal tissue, lens capsule or amniotic membrane. For the treatment of very large and persistent macular holes, the induction of a localized retinal detachment at the posterior pole by subretinal injection of balanced salt solution and a subsequent attenuation of the rim of the hole during fluid-air exchange has been suggested as a promising surgical technique. In particular, accurate patient education about the expected surgical outcome in this specific group of patients appears important.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare the outcome of submacular hemorrhage (SMH) displacement using pneumatic displacement with intravitreal expansile gas versus pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with subretinal injection of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent, and air as primary surgery.
METHODS: Retrospective interventional case series of 63 patients who underwent surgical displacement of SMH secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) or polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) from May 1, 2015, to October 31, 2022. Medical records were reviewed for diagnosis, logMAR visual acuity (VA), central subfield thickness (CST), and postoperative displacement rates and complications up to 12 months after operation.
RESULTS: The diagnosis was nAMD in 24 (38.1%) and PCV in 39 (61.9%) eyes. There were 40 (63.5%) eyes in the pneumatic displacement group (38 received C3F8, 2 received SF6) and 23 (36.5%) eyes in the subretinal cocktail injection. Mean baseline VA was 1.46 and 1.62, respectively (p = 0.404). The subretinal injection group had more extensive SMH (p = 0.005), thicker CST (1,006.6 μm vs. 780.2 μm, p = 0.012), and longer interval between symptom and operation (10.65 vs. 5.53 days, p < 0.001). The mean postoperative VA at 6 months was 0.67 and 0.91 (p = 0.180) for pneumatic displacement and subretinal injection groups, respectively, though VA was significantly better in the pneumatic group at 12-month visit (0.64 vs. 1.03, p = 0.040). At least 10 mean change in VA were >10 letters gain in both groups up to 12 months. Postoperative CST reduction was greater (625.1 μm vs. 326.5 μm, p = 0.008) and complete foveal displacement (87.0% vs. 37.5%), p < 0.001, odds ratio [OR] = 11.1) and displacement to arcade or beyond (52.5% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.009, OR = 5.15) were more frequent in the subretinal injection group. Two patients with failed pneumatic displacement were successfully treated with subretinal cocktail injection as a second operation.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical displacement of SMH leads to clinically meaningful improvement in VA. PPV with subretinal cocktail injection is more effective than pneumatic displacement in displacing SMH with similar safety profile despite longer interval before operation, higher CST, and more extensive SMH at baseline. Retinal surgeons could consider this novel technique in cases with thick and extensive SMH or as a rescue secondary operation in selected cases.

Subretinal injection methods and other procedures for treating retinal conditions and diseases (many considered incurable) have been limited in scope due to limited human motor control. This study demonstrates the next generation, cooperatively controlled Steady-Hand Eye Robot (SHER 3.0), a precise and intuitive-to-use robotic platform achieving clinical standards for targeting accuracy and resolution for subretinal injections. The system design and basic kinematics are reported and a deflection model for the incorporated delta stage and validation experiments are presented. This model optimizes the delta stage parameters, maximizing the global conditioning index and minimizing torsional compliance. Five tests measuring accuracy, repeatability, and deflection show the optimized stage design achieves a tip accuracy of < 30 μm, tip repeatability of 9.3 μm and 0.02°, and deflections between 20-350 μm/N. Future work will use updated control models to refine tip positioning outcomes and will be tested on in vivo animal models.

The upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is strongly associated with the development of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Currently, the standard treatment for nAMD involves frequent intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents, which inhibit the growth of new blood vessels and prevent leakage. However, this treatment regimen places a significant burden on patients, their families, and healthcare providers due to the need for repeated visits to the clinic for injections. Gene therapy, which enables the sustained expression of anti-VEGF proteins after a single injection, can dramatically reduce the treatment burden. KH631 is a recombinant adeno-associated virus 8 vector that encodes a human VEGF receptor fusion protein, and it is being developed as a long-term treatment for nAMD. In preclinical studies using non-human primates, subretinal administration of KH631 at a low dose of 3 × 108 vg/eye resulted in remarkable retention of the transgene product in the retina and prevented the formation and progression of grade IV CNV lesions. Furthermore, sustained transgene expression was observed for more than 96 weeks. These findings suggest that a single subretinal injection of KH631 has the potential to offer a one-time, low-dose treatment for nAMD patients.