sub-inguinal

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    治疗儿童和青少年精索静脉曲张的理想手术方法仍存在争议。有几种技术可用,包括光学放大(通过开放腹股沟或腹股沟下入路)保留动脉或淋巴,腹腔镜,顺行和逆行栓塞/硬化治疗。
    我们旨在评估这些技术在儿童和青少年中的临床结果。
    进行了系统评价(1997-2023年)。使用随机效应模型进行非比较研究(Freeman-Tukey转换)的荟萃分析或比例荟萃分析。结果表示为总比例%和95%置信区间(CI)。
    我们确定了1910项研究;删除了632个重复项,1278人被筛选,审查了203份,包括56份,12份报告涉及2种不同的技术(共68个数据集)。经腹股沟入路光学放大(498例):复发2.5%(0.6-5.6),鞘膜积液1.6%(0.47-3.4),睾丸萎缩1%(0.3-2.0),并发症1.1%(0.2-2.6);经腹股沟下入路光学放大(592例):复发2.1%(0.7-4.4),鞘膜积液1.26%(0.5-2.3),睾丸萎缩0.5%(0.1-1.3),并发症4%(1.0-8.8)。腹腔镜下包块结扎/分割(1943例):复发2.9%(1.5-4.6),鞘膜积液11.4%(8.3-14.9);并发症1.5%(0.6-2.9);腹腔镜保留淋巴(974例):复发2.4%(1.5-3.5),鞘膜积液1.2%(0.45-3.36),并发症1.2%(0.05-3.9);腹腔镜保留动脉(228例):复发6.6%(2.3-12.9),鞘膜积液6.5%(2.6-12.0)。顺行栓塞/硬化治疗(403例):复发7.6%(5.2-10.4),鞘膜积液0.8%(0.17-1.9),技术故障0.6%(0.1-1.6),并发症4.0%(2.3-6.1);逆行栓塞/硬化治疗(509例):复发6.9%(4.6-9.5),鞘膜积液0.8%(0.05-2.5),技术故障10.2%(4.6-17.6),并发症4.8%(1.0-11.2)。
    复发率在2.1%至7.6%之间变化,而栓塞/硬化治疗技术的复发率更高。术后鞘膜积液率在0.8%至11.4%之间变化,而腹腔镜下的包块结扎/分割技术更高。腹腔镜和栓塞/硬化治疗技术尚未报道睾丸萎缩。逆行栓塞技术与10%的技术失败(无法完成手术)有关。腹腔镜淋巴保留技术的特点是复发率最低,鞘膜积液和其他并发症的发生率,也没有睾丸萎缩的报告.
    UNASSIGNED: The ideal surgical approach for the management of varicocele in children and adolescents remains controversial. Several techniques are available including artery- or lymphatic-sparing with optical magnification (via open inguinal or sub-inguinal approach), laparoscopic, antegrade and retrograde embolization/sclerotherapy.
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to appraise the clinical outcomes of these techniques in children and adolescents.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic review was conducted (1997-2023). Meta-analysis or proportional meta-analysis for non-comparative studies (Freeman-Tukey transformation) using the random effects model was conducted. Results are expressed as overall proportion % and 95% confidence interval (CI).
    UNASSIGNED: We identified 1910 studies; 632 duplicates were removed, 1278 were screened, 203 were reviewed and 56 were included, with 12 reporting on 2 different techniques (total of 68 data sets). Optical magnification via inguinal approach (498 cases): recurrence 2.5% (0.6-5.6), hydrocele 1.6% (0.47-3.4), testicular atrophy 1% (0.3-2.0), complications 1.1% (0.2-2.6); optical magnification via sub-inguinal approach (592 cases): recurrence 2.1% (0.7-4.4), hydrocele 1.26% (0.5-2.3), testicular atrophy 0.5% (0.1-1.3), complications 4% (1.0-8.8). Laparoscopic with mass-ligation/division (1943 cases): recurrence 2.9% (1.5-4.6), hydrocele 11.4% (8.3-14.9); complications 1.5% (0.6-2.9); laparoscopic with lymphatic-sparing (974 cases): recurrence 2.4% (1.5-3.5), hydrocele 1.2% (0.45-3.36), complications 1.2% (0.05-3.9); laparoscopic with artery-sparing (228 cases): recurrence 6.6% (2.3-12.9), hydrocele 6.5% (2.6-12.0). Antegrade embolization/sclerotherapy (403 cases): recurrence 7.6% (5.2-10.4), hydrocele 0.8% (0.17-1.9), technical failure 0.6% (0.1-1.6), complications 4.0% (2.3-6.1); retrograde embolization/sclerotherapy (509 cases): recurrence 6.9% (4.6-9.5), hydrocele 0.8% (0.05-2.5), technical failure 10.2% (4.6-17.6), and complications 4.8% (1.0-11.2).
    UNASSIGNED: The recurrence rate varies between 2.1% and 7.6% and is higher with the embolization/sclerotherapy techniques. Post-operative hydrocele rate varies between 0.8% and 11.4% and is higher with the laparoscopic mass-ligation/division technique. Testicular atrophy has not been reported with the laparoscopic and embolization/sclerotherapy techniques. The retrograde embolization technique is associated with 10% technical failure (inability to complete the procedure). The laparoscopic lymphatic-sparing technique is characterized by the lowest recurrence rate, incidence of hydrocele and other complications, and no reports of testicular atrophy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Radical inguinal orchidectomy with ligation and division of the spermatic cord at the deep inguinal ring is the treatment of choice for testicular mass suspicious of cancer. In the era of organ preserving and minimally invasive surgery, it may be possible to propose a less radical sub-inguinal orchidectomy that may avoid the morbidity associated with opening the inguinal canal. The effect of this approach on oncological margins is not known. The aim of this article was to investigate the presence of spermatic cord involvement after a radical inguinal orchidectomy with a view to test feasibility of a modified sub-inguinal approach for testicular tumour excision.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective study on all orchidectomies performed for suspected testicular cancer was performed at a single hospital from over an 8-year period from January 2005 to December 2013. Non-cancerous lesions were excluded after histopathological review. All testicular malignancies were included and detailed histopathological review was performed.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 121 orchidectomies were performed over the 8-year period. Three patients had spermatic cord involvement. Spermatic cord involvement did not adversely affect the outcome in these patients after a median follow-up of 5 years irrespective of tumour histology. The proximal spermatic cord was not involved in any testicular germ cell tumours on further cord sectioning, the only patient with proximal cord involvement had a B-cell lymphoma.
    UNASSIGNED: We postulate that a sub-inguinal modified orchidectomy may be a less invasive alternative to radical inguinal orchidectomy, with comparable oncological outcomes based on low risk of spermatic cord involvement, which in itself is not a prognostic factor. We require further long-term follow-up studies on patients who have undergone this approach to validate the oncological outcomes and report the possible advantage of lower post-operative complications with this technique.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号