structural variations (SVs)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    分支肾(BOR)和分支耳(BO)综合征的特征是影响耳朵的异常,常伴有听力损失,以及支气管弓和肾脏系统的异常。这些综合征表现出广泛的表型和复杂的基因组景观,EYA1基因和SIX基因家族的重要贡献,包括SIX1和SIX5。由于它们不同的表型表现,可以与其他遗传综合征重叠,分子遗传学确认至关重要。随着测序技术的进步,全基因组测序(WGS)越来越多地用于罕见疾病诊断.我们使用逐步方法探索了23个不相关的韩国家庭的基因组景观,这些家庭具有典型或非典型的BOR/BO综合征:靶向组测序和外显子组测序(步骤1),多重连接依赖性探针扩增(MLPA)与拷贝数变异筛选(步骤2),和WGS(步骤3)。将WGS集成到我们的诊断管道中检测到的结构变化,包括隐秘倒位和复杂的基因组重排,最终将诊断率提高到91%。我们的发现扩展了BOR/BO综合征的基因组结构,并强调了WGS解决临床异质性罕见疾病的遗传诊断的必要性。
    Branchio-oto-renal (BOR) and branchio-otic (BO) syndromes are characterized by anomalies affecting the ears, often accompanied by hearing loss, as well as abnormalities in the branchial arches and renal system. These syndromes exhibit a broad spectrum of phenotypes and a complex genomic landscape, with significant contributions from the EYA1 gene and the SIX gene family, including SIX1 and SIX5. Due to their diverse phenotypic presentations, which can overlap with other genetic syndromes, molecular genetic confirmation is essential. As sequencing technologies advance, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is increasingly used in rare disease diagnostics. We explored the genomic landscape of 23 unrelated Korean families with typical or atypical BOR/BO syndrome using a stepwise approach: targeted panel sequencing and exome sequencing (Step 1), multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) with copy number variation screening (Step 2), and WGS (Step 3). Integrating WGS into our diagnostic pipeline detected structure variations, including cryptic inversion and complex genomic rearrangement, eventually enhancing the diagnostic yield to 91%. Our findings expand the genomic architecture of BOR/BO syndrome and highlight the need for WGS to address the genetic diagnosis of clinically heterogeneous rare diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    结构变体(SV)是DNA突变的重要类型之一,通常被定义为大于50bp的基因组改变,包括插入,删除,重复,倒置,和易位。这些修饰可以深刻影响表型特征,并导致癌症等疾病,对治疗的反应,和感染。已经使用三个牛津纳米孔NGS人类基因组数据集对四个长读对准器和五个SV调用者进行了精度评估,召回,和F1分数统计指标,覆盖深度,分析的速度。关于召回的最佳SV呼叫者,精度,当在不同覆盖水平下与不同对准者匹配时,和F1得分倾向于根据所分析的数据集和特定SV类型而变化。然而,根据我们的发现,Sniffles和CuteSV往往在不同的对准器和覆盖级别上表现良好,其次是SVIM,PBSV,和SVDSS在最后一个地方。CuteSV呼叫者的平均F1得分最高(82.51%)和召回率最高(78.50%),和Sniffles具有最高的平均精度值(94.33%)。Minimap2作为对准器和Sniffles作为SV呼叫者,由于它们的高速和合理的成就,它们是SV呼叫管道的坚实基础。PBSV的平均F1得分较低,精度,和召回,并可能产生更多的误报,忽视一些实际的SV。我们的结果在对流行的SV调用者和对齐器的综合评估中很有价值,因为它们可以深入了解几种长读对齐器和SV调用者的性能,并为研究人员选择最适合SV检测的工具提供参考。
    Structural variants (SVs) are one of the significant types of DNA mutations and are typically defined as larger-than-50-bp genomic alterations that include insertions, deletions, duplications, inversions, and translocations. These modifications can profoundly impact the phenotypic characteristics and contribute to disorders like cancer, response to treatment, and infections. Four long-read aligners and five SV callers have been evaluated using three Oxford Nanopore NGS human genome datasets in terms of precision, recall, and F1-score statistical metrics, depth of coverage, and speed of analysis. The best SV caller regarding recall, precision, and F1-score when matched with different aligners at different coverage levels tend to vary depending on the dataset and the specific SV types being analyzed. However, based on our findings, Sniffles and CuteSV tend to perform well across different aligners and coverage levels, followed by SVIM, PBSV, and SVDSS in the last place. The CuteSV caller has the highest average F1-score (82.51%) and recall (78.50%), and Sniffles has the highest average precision value (94.33%). Minimap2 as an aligner and Sniffles as an SV caller act as a strong base for the pipeline of SV calling because of their high speed and reasonable accomplishment. PBSV has a lower average F1-score, precision, and recall and may generate more false positives and overlook some actual SVs. Our results are valuable in the comprehensive evaluation of popular SV callers and aligners as they provide insight into the performance of several long-read aligners and SV callers and serve as a reference for researchers in selecting the most suitable tools for SV detection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:亲生父母的某些染色体结构变异(SV)可导致复发性自然流产(RSAs)。减数分裂过程中的不等交叉会导致配子染色体的不平衡重排,例如复制或缺失。不幸的是,常规技术,如核型分析,荧光原位杂交(FISH),染色体微阵列分析(CMA),拷贝数变异测序(CNV-seq)不能检测所有类型的SV。在这项研究中,我们证明光学基因组作图(OGM)能够以高分辨率快速准确地检测RSA患者的SVs,并在基因水平上提供有关断点区域的更多信息.方法:招募7对因流产胚胎染色体重排不平衡而遭受RSA的夫妇,并从其外周血中分离出超高分子量(UHMW)DNA。在BionanoSolve数据分析软件上通过从头组装创建共识基因组图谱。通过参考基因组GRCh38/hg38的比对鉴定SV和断点。使用牛津纳米孔测序或Sanger测序验证确切的断点序列。结果:OGM成功检测到招募夫妇中的各种SV。此外,发现了其他复杂的染色体重排(CCR)和四个隐蔽的平衡相互易位(BRT),进一步完善RSA的潜在遗传原因。在这项研究中发现了两个被破坏的基因,FOXK2[46,XY,t(7;17)(q31.3;q25)]和PLXDC2[46,XX,t(10;16)(p12.31;q23.1)],先前已证明与男性生育力和胚胎运输有关。结论:OGM能准确检测染色体SVs,尤其是隐秘的BRT和CCR。它是人类常规基因诊断的有用补充,例如核型分析,并且比常规遗传诊断更准确地检测隐匿性BRT和CCR。
    Background and aims: Certain chromosomal structural variations (SVs) in biological parents can lead to recurrent spontaneous abortions (RSAs). Unequal crossing over during meiosis can result in the unbalanced rearrangement of gamete chromosomes such as duplication or deletion. Unfortunately, routine techniques such as karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), and copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) cannot detect all types of SVs. In this study, we show that optical genome mapping (OGM) quickly and accurately detects SVs for RSA patients with a high resolution and provides more information about the breakpoint regions at gene level. Methods: Seven couples who had suffered RSA with unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements of aborted embryos were recruited, and ultra-high molecular weight (UHMW) DNA was isolated from their peripheral blood. The consensus genome map was created by de novo assembly on the Bionano Solve data analysis software. SVs and breakpoints were identified via alignments of the reference genome GRCh38/hg38. The exact breakpoint sequences were verified using either Oxford Nanopore sequencing or Sanger sequencing. Results: Various SVs in the recruited couples were successfully detected by OGM. Also, additional complex chromosomal rearrangement (CCRs) and four cryptic balanced reciprocal translocations (BRTs) were revealed, further refining the underlying genetic causes of RSA. Two of the disrupted genes identified in this study, FOXK2 [46,XY,t(7; 17)(q31.3; q25)] and PLXDC2 [46,XX,t(10; 16)(p12.31; q23.1)], had been previously shown to be associated with male fertility and embryo transit. Conclusion: OGM accurately detects chromosomal SVs, especially cryptic BRTs and CCRs. It is a useful complement to routine human genetic diagnostics, such as karyotyping, and detects cryptic BRTs and CCRs more accurately than routine genetic diagnostics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Differences between plant genomes range from single nucleotide polymorphisms to large-scale duplications, deletions and rearrangements. The large polymorphisms are termed structural variants (SVs). SVs have received significant attention in human genetics and were found to be responsible for various chronic diseases. However, little effort has been directed towards understanding the role of SVs in plants. Many recent advances in plant genetics have resulted from improvements in high-resolution technologies for measuring SVs, including microarray-based techniques, and more recently, high-throughput DNA sequencing. In this review we describe recent reports of SV in plants and describe the genomic technologies currently used to measure these SVs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号