stroke rehabilitation

中风康复
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估带有双任务练习的本体感觉训练策略对慢性中风患者步态的影响。
    方法:系统评价。
    方法:慢性中风。
    方法:根据PRISMA指南和PICOS标准进行搜索。PubMed,WebofScience,和Scopus数据库从2020年11月至2022年2月进行了系统搜索,以获得合格的临床试验。两名独立审稿人彻底筛选了潜在文章的相关性,并评估了方法质量。根据等级,PICOS标准,以及偏差工具的Cochrane风险,作者纳入了有关本体感觉训练中双重任务对慢性卒中患者步态参数的有效性的文章.
    结果:在3075项确定的研究中,11篇文章符合纳入标准:7篇为随机临床试验,1不是随机的,和3个是观察性研究。证据的整体质量,使用等级框架进行评估,很高,表明对系统评价的结果有很高的信心。论文涉及393名中风患者;241名接受了本体感受训练的双重任务,152名参与者参加了其他中风康复;在双重任务组中,71从事认知任务,170人参加了运动任务。本体感觉训练中的双重任务提高了步态速度,节奏,跨步时间,步幅长度,和步长。观察到效果最好,每周训练3次,共4周,每节课持续30分钟,在速度上,节奏,步幅长度,和步长。
    结论:目前的证据表明,本体感受训练策略和双任务练习可以改善慢性卒中患者的步行能力。具体来说,它提高了步态速度,临床严重程度的关键指标。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the impact of proprioceptive training strategies with dual-task exercises on gait in people with chronic stroke.
    METHODS: Systematic review.
    METHODS: Chronic stroke.
    METHODS: Searches were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and PICOS criteria. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were systematically searched from November 2020 to February 2022, for eligible clinical trials. Two independent reviewers thoroughly screened potential articles for relevance and assessed the methodology quality. In accordance with the GRADE, PICOS criteria, and Cochrane risk of bias tools, the authors included articles concerning the effectiveness of dual-task in proprioceptive training on gait parameters in people with chronic stroke.
    RESULTS: Of 3075 identified studies, 11 articles met the inclusion criteria: 7 were randomized clinical trials, 1 was not randomized, and 3 were observational studies. The overall quality of evidence, assessed using the GRADE framework, was high, indicating a high level of confidence in the systematic review\'s findings. The papers involved 393 stroke patients; 241 underwent dual-task in proprioceptive training, with 152 participants in other stroke rehabilitation; within the dual-task group, 71 engaged in cognitive tasks, and 170 participated in motor tasks. dual-task in proprioceptive training improved gait speed, cadence, stride time, stride length, and step length. The best effects were observed with training 3 times a week for 4 weeks, with each session lasting 30 minutes, on speed, cadence, stride length, and step length.
    CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that proprioceptive training strategies with dual-task exercises improved walking abilities in people with chronic stroke. Specifically, it enhanced gait speed, a key indicator of clinical severity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:中风患者经常面临严重影响其日常生活的残疾。营养不良是这些患者的常见问题,营养不良会严重影响卒中后的功能恢复。因此,营养治疗对于管理卒中结局至关重要.然而,它对残疾的影响,日常生活活动(ADL),和其他关键成果尚未得到充分探索。
    目的:评价营养治疗对脑卒中后患者减少残疾和改善ADL的作用。
    方法:我们搜索了Cochrane卒中组的试验记录,中部,MEDLINE(自1946年起)Embase(自1974年起),CINAHL(自1982年起),和AMED(从1985年起)至2024年2月19日。我们还搜索了试验和研究登记处(ClinicalTrials.gov,世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台)和参考文章列表。
    方法:我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT),比较了营养治疗与安慰剂,日常护理,或中风后的一种营养疗法。营养治疗被定义为补充营养,包括能量,蛋白质,氨基酸,脂肪酸,维生素,矿物,通过口头,肠内,或肠胃外方法。作为一个比较器,一种营养疗法是指所有形式的营养疗法,排除定义用于干预组的特定营养疗法.
    方法:我们使用Cochrane的Screen4Me工作流程来评估初始搜索结果。两位综述作者独立筛选了符合纳入标准的参考文献,提取的数据,并使用GRADE方法评估偏倚风险和证据的确定性。我们计算了连续数据的平均差(MD)或标准化平均差(SMD)和二分数据的比值比(OR),95%置信区间(CI)。我们使用I2统计量评估异质性。主要结果是残疾和ADL。我们还评估了步态,营养状况,全因死亡率,生活质量,手和腿的肌肉力量,认知功能,物理性能,中风复发,吞咽功能,神经损伤,和并发症(不良事件)的发展作为次要结局。
    结果:我们确定了52个合格的RCT,涉及11,926名参与者。在急性期进行了36项研究,10在亚急性期,三个在急性期和亚急性期,还有三个在慢性期。23项研究包括缺血性中风患者,其中三名包括出血性中风患者,其中3例包括蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)患者,23例包括缺血性或出血性卒中患者,包括SAH.有25种类型的营养补充剂用作干预措施。评估残疾和ADL作为结果的研究数量分别为9项和17项。对于使用口服能量和蛋白质补充剂的干预,这是这篇综述的主要干预措施,纳入了六项研究。七个结果的结果集中在(残疾,ADL,体重变化,全因死亡率,步态速度,生活质量,和并发症发生率(不良事件))如下:当“良好状态”定义为mRS评分为0至2时,没有证据表明减少残疾的差异(对于“良好状态”:OR0.97,95%CI0.86至1.10;1个RCT,4023名参与者;低确定性证据)。口服能量和蛋白质补充剂可以改善ADL,如FIM运动评分增加所示,但证据非常不确定(MD8.74,95%CI5.93至11.54;2项随机对照试验,165名参与者;非常低的确定性证据)。口服能量和蛋白质补充剂可能会增加体重,但证据非常不确定(MD0.90,95%CI0.23至1.58;3项RCT,205名参与者;非常低的确定性证据)。没有证据表明在降低全因死亡率方面存在差异(OR0.57,95%CI0.14至2.28;2项随机对照试验,4065名参与者;低确定性证据)。对于步态速度和生活质量,没有确定研究。关于并发症(不良事件)的发生率,没有证据表明感染的发生率有差异,包括肺炎,尿路感染,和败血症(OR0.68,95%CI0.20至2.30;1个RCT,42名参与者;非常低的确定性证据)。与常规治疗相比,干预措施与腹泻发生率增加相关(OR4.29,95%CI1.98至9.28;1RCT,4023名参与者;低确定性证据)和高血糖或低血糖的发生(OR15.6,95%CI4.84至50.23;1个RCT,4023名参与者;低确定性证据)。
    结论:我们不确定营养治疗的效果,包括口服能量和蛋白质补充剂以及本综述中确定的其他补充剂,关于减少中风后患者的残疾和改善ADL。在纳入的研究中,评估了各种营养干预措施的结果。几乎所有研究的样本量都很小。这导致了进行荟萃分析的挑战,并降低了证据的准确性。此外,大多数研究都存在偏见风险,特别是在没有盲目性和不清楚的信息方面。关于不良事件,口服能量和蛋白质补充剂的干预与较高数量的不良事件相关,比如腹泻,高血糖症,和低血糖,与通常的护理相比。然而,证据质量很低。鉴于我们审查中大多数证据的确定性较低,需要进一步的研究。未来的研究应该集中在有针对性的营养干预,以减少残疾和改善ADL的理论基础上,中风后的人,有必要改进方法和报告。
    BACKGROUND: Stroke patients often face disabilities that significantly interfere with their daily lives. Poor nutritional status is a common issue amongst these patients, and malnutrition can severely impact their functional recovery post-stroke. Therefore, nutritional therapy is crucial in managing stroke outcomes. However, its effects on disability, activities of daily living (ADL), and other critical outcomes have not been fully explored.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of nutritional therapy on reducing disability and improving ADL in patients after stroke.
    METHODS: We searched the trial registers of the Cochrane Stroke Group, CENTRAL, MEDLINE (from 1946), Embase (from 1974), CINAHL (from 1982), and AMED (from 1985) to 19 February 2024. We also searched trials and research registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) and reference lists of articles.
    METHODS: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared nutritional therapy with placebo, usual care, or one type of nutritional therapy in people after stroke. Nutritional therapy was defined as the administration of supplemental nutrients, including energy, protein, amino acids, fatty acids, vitamins, and minerals, through oral, enteral, or parenteral methods. As a comparator, one type of nutritional therapy refers to all forms of nutritional therapies, excluding the specific nutritional therapy defined for use in the intervention group.
    METHODS: We used Cochrane\'s Screen4Me workflow to assess the initial search results. Two review authors independently screened references that met the inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We calculated the mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous data and the odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous data, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed heterogeneity using the I2 statistic. The primary outcomes were disability and ADL. We also assessed gait, nutritional status, all-cause mortality, quality of life, hand and leg muscle strength, cognitive function, physical performance, stroke recurrence, swallowing function, neurological impairment, and the development of complications (adverse events) as secondary outcomes.
    RESULTS: We identified 52 eligible RCTs involving 11,926 participants. Thirty-six studies were conducted in the acute phase, 10 in the subacute phase, three in the acute and subacute phases, and three in the chronic phase. Twenty-three studies included patients with ischaemic stroke, three included patients with haemorrhagic stroke, three included patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), and 23 included patients with ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke including SAH. There were 25 types of nutritional supplements used as an intervention. The number of studies that assessed disability and ADL as outcomes were nine and 17, respectively. For the intervention using oral energy and protein supplements, which was a primary intervention in this review, six studies were included. The results for the seven outcomes focused on (disability, ADL, body weight change, all-cause mortality, gait speed, quality of life, and incidence of complications (adverse events)) were as follows: There was no evidence of a difference in reducing disability when \'good status\' was defined as an mRS score of 0 to 2 (for \'good status\': OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.10; 1 RCT, 4023 participants; low-certainty evidence). Oral energy and protein supplements may improve ADL as indicated by an increase in the FIM motor score, but the evidence is very uncertain (MD 8.74, 95% CI 5.93 to 11.54; 2 RCTs, 165 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Oral energy and protein supplements may increase body weight, but the evidence is very uncertain (MD 0.90, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.58; 3 RCTs, 205 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There was no evidence of a difference in reducing all-cause mortality (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.14 to 2.28; 2 RCTs, 4065 participants; low-certainty evidence). For gait speed and quality of life, no study was identified. With regard to incidence of complications (adverse events), there was no evidence of a difference in the incidence of infections, including pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and septicaemia (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.20 to 2.30; 1 RCT, 42 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The intervention was associated with an increased incidence of diarrhoea compared to usual care (OR 4.29, 95% CI 1.98 to 9.28; 1 RCT, 4023 participants; low-certainty evidence) and the occurrence of hyperglycaemia or hypoglycaemia (OR 15.6, 95% CI 4.84 to 50.23; 1 RCT, 4023 participants; low-certainty evidence).
    CONCLUSIONS: We are uncertain about the effect of nutritional therapy, including oral energy and protein supplements and other supplements identified in this review, on reducing disability and improving ADL in people after stroke. Various nutritional interventions were assessed for the outcomes in the included studies, and almost all studies had small sample sizes. This led to challenges in conducting meta-analyses and reduced the precision of the evidence. Moreover, most of the studies had issues with the risk of bias, especially in terms of the absence of blinding and unclear information. Regarding adverse events, the intervention with oral energy and protein supplements was associated with a higher number of adverse events, such as diarrhoea, hyperglycaemia, and hypoglycaemia, compared to usual care. However, the quality of the evidence was low. Given the low certainty of most of the evidence in our review, further research is needed. Future research should focus on targeted nutritional interventions to reduce disability and improve ADL based on a theoretical rationale in people after stroke and there is a need for improved methodology and reporting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:中风损害患者的行走能力。在急性中风患者中,建议使用6分钟步行距离(6MWD)来评估步行功能。最小临床重要差异(MCID)用于确定康复的有效性;但是,6MWD的MCID尚未得到充分验证。本研究旨在估算6MWD的MCID,衡量行走耐力,在急性中风患者中使用基于锚的方法。
    方法:根据2周后从基线到随访测量的6MWD变化,MCID是使用基于锚的方法(接收者操作者操作特性曲线,预测和调整模型),具有患者和治疗师评级的全球变化量表(p-GRC,t-GRC)作为外部锚。从曲线下的面积估计“有意义的变化”的准确性。使用MCID的信誉工具,评估了每个锚的可信度。使用信誉工具,高可信度被定义为满足核心标准的3/5和所有标准的6/9。
    结果:分析包括58例患者。对于p-GRC,每个锚的MCID为78.7-100.0m,t-GRC为95.2-99.5米。p-GRC表现出优异的准确性(曲线下面积>0.8)。以p-GRC为锚点,超过50%的患者表现出改善。p-GRC满足可靠性仪器上3/5的核心标准和6/9的所有标准。t-GRC显示出较低的可靠性,并满足2/5的核心标准和3/9的所有标准。
    结论:由于改善组的百分比超过50%,调整后的模型在基于锚的方法中是有用的。治疗师可能无法准确捕捉到患者的疲劳和主观症状,可能影响6MWD变化评分与t-GRC之间的相关性,因此,可靠性仪器。p-GRC具有很高的准确性和可靠性;因此,MCID估计为78.7m。
    OBJECTIVE: Stroke impairs a patient\'s ability to walk. In patients with acute stroke, a 6-min walking distance (6MWD) is recommended to assess walking function. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is used to determine the effectiveness of rehabilitation; however, the MCID for 6MWD has not been adequately validated. This study aimed to estimate the MCID of 6MWD, a measure of walking endurance, in patients with acute stroke using anchor-based methods.
    METHODS: Based on the change in 6MWD from baseline to the follow-up measurement 2 weeks later, the MCID was estimated using anchor-based methods (receiver operator operating characteristic curves, predictive and adjustment models) with a patient- and therapist-rated global rating of change scale (p-GRC, t-GRC) as external anchors. The accuracy of \"meaningful change\" was estimated from the area under the curve. Using MCID\'s credibility instruments, the credibility of each anchor was evaluated. Using the credibility instrument, high credibility was defined as satisfying 3/5 of the Core criteria and 6/9 of all criteria.
    RESULTS: The analysis included 58 patients. The MCID for each anchor was 78.7-100.0 m for p-GRC, and 95.2-99.5 m for t-GRC. The p-GRC demonstrated excellent accuracy (area under the curve >0.8). With p-GRC as anchors, over 50% of patients showed improvement. The p-GRC satisfied the core criterion of 3/5 and all criteria of 6/9 on the reliability instrument. The t-GRC demonstrated low reliability and satisfied the core criterion of 2/5 and all criteria of 3/9.
    CONCLUSIONS: Since the percentage of improved groups exceeded 50%, the adjusted model was useful in the anchor-based method. Therapists may not accurately capture patient fatigue and subjective symptoms, potentially affecting the correlation between the 6MWD change score and the t-GRC and, consequently, the reliability instrument. The p-GRC showed high accuracy and reliability; therefore, the MCID was estimated to be 78.7 m.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    中风后,对控制运动的大脑部分的损伤导致运动功能的丧失。基于脑机接口(BCI)的中风康复涉及患者想象运动而不进行身体运动,同时系统测量运动皮层中的感知运动节奏。同时提供通过虚拟现实和功能性电刺激的视觉反馈。在中风的亚急性期,真实BCI优于假BCI尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在比较真实和假BCI对腕关节伸肌力弱的亚急性卒中患者运动功能和脑活动的影响.
    这是一项双盲随机对照试验。中风患者将分为真实BCI和假BCI组。BCI任务包括手腕伸展60分钟/天,5次/周持续4周。将举行二十次会议。评估将进行四次,如下:在干预之前,干预开始后2周,干预后立即,干预后4周。评估包括临床评估,脑电图,和使用运动诱发电位的肌电图。
    患者将分为两组,如下:在BCI康复训练期间将接受神经反馈的人和未接受这种反馈的人。我们将研究运动成像反馈的重要性,以及患者持续参与训练而不是被动的影响。临床试验注册:KCT0008589。
    UNASSIGNED: After a stroke, damage to the part of the brain that controls movement results in the loss of motor function. Brain-computer interface (BCI)-based stroke rehabilitation involves patients imagining movement without physically moving while the system measures the perceptual-motor rhythm in the motor cortex. Visual feedback through virtual reality and functional electrical stimulation is provided simultaneously. The superiority of real BCI over sham BCI in the subacute phase of stroke remains unclear. Therefore, we aim to compare the effects of real and sham BCI on motor function and brain activity among patients with subacute stroke with weak wrist extensor strength.
    UNASSIGNED: This is a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Patients with stroke will be categorized into real BCI and sham BCI groups. The BCI task involves wrist extension for 60 min/day, 5 times/week for 4 weeks. Twenty sessions will be conducted. The evaluation will be conducted four times, as follows: before the intervention, 2 weeks after the start of the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention. The assessments include a clinical evaluation, electroencephalography, and electromyography using motor-evoked potentials.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients will be categorized into two groups, as follows: those who will be receiving neurofeedback and those who will not receive this feedback during the BCI rehabilitation training. We will examine the importance of motor imaging feedback, and the effect of patients\' continuous participation in the training rather than their being passive.Clinical Trial Registration: KCT0008589.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:个人和社会都因缺血性卒中(IS)而承受着相当大的负担,患者出院后不仅继续患有运动功能障碍,但他们的照顾者也承担着协助他们重新融入家庭和社会的主要责任。为了更好地改善IS患者的肢体功能和日常生活活动,在从医院转院回家期间,他们的护理人员也应该参与运动功能康复的培训。本研究旨在探讨以护士为主导的IS患者及其家庭照顾者培训对改善患者身体机能和照顾者负担的影响。
    方法:将在医院和家庭随访期间进行一项盲评估的随机对照试验。58对诊断为缺血性中风的成年人及其主要护理人员将包括在内。参与者将被随机给予(1)一名护士主导,由护理人员(干预组)或(2)常规自我护理(对照组)参与家庭运动康复训练。两组均将于出院当天接受评估及健康指导,干预小组将接受额外的家庭培训计划和监督。这两组将在出院后每周进行随访。主要结果来自对身体功能和照顾者相关负担的评估,以及从修改后的Barthel指数的统计数据得出的次要结果,中风特定的生活质量,和美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表。两组之间的差异将通过双向重复测量方差分析来衡量,考虑基线时以及训练后1周和4周随访时的数据.
    结论:结果可能提供关于这种文化上适当的影响的新颖和有价值的信息,照顾者参与,以家庭为基础的康复训练对IS患者的身体功能和照顾者相关负担的影响。
    背景:中国临床试验注册中心(chictr.org.cn)ChiCTR2300078798。2023年12月19日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Both individuals and society bear a considerable burden from ischemic stroke (IS), not only do patients continue suffering from motor dysfunction after discharge from hospital, but their caregivers also undertake the principal responsibility of assisting them in reintegrating into the family and society. To better improve the IS patients\' limb function and daily life activities, their caregivers should also be involved in the training of the motor function rehabilitation during the period transitioning from hospital back home. This study mainly aims to investigate the effects of a nurse-led training for IS patients and their family caregivers on the improvement of the patients\' physical function and the burden of caregivers.
    METHODS: A randomized controlled trial with blind assessment will be conducted in hospitals and during the follow-ups at home. Fifty-eight pairs of adults diagnosed with ischemic stroke and their primary caregivers will be included. Participants will be randomly given with (1) a nurse-led, home-based motor rehabilitation training participated by caregivers (intervention group) or (2) routine self-care (control group). Both groups will receive assessment and health guidance on the day of discharge, and the intervention group will receive an additional home-based training program and supervision. These two groups will be followed up every week after discharge. The primary results are drawn from the evaluation of physical function and caregiver-related burden, and the secondary results derived from statistics of the modified Barthel index, stroke-specific quality of life, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Differences between the two groups will be measured by two-way repeated measures ANOVA, considering the data at baseline and at 1-week and 4-week follow-up after training.
    CONCLUSIONS: Results may provide novel and valuable information on the effects of this culturally appropriate, caregiver-involved, and home-based rehabilitation training on the physical function of IS patients and caregiver-related burden.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (chictr.org.cn) ChiCTR2300078798. Registered on December 19, 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这种平行,随机对照试验检查了内在动机,两组进行12周的受试者证明了依从性和运动功能的改善,家庭上肢康复计划。17名受试者玩脚手架游戏,呈现八到十二个离散的难度增加的水平。16名受试者执行了由成功算法控制的相同活动,这些活动逐步修改了游戏难度。
    方法:33名20-80岁的人,卒中后至少6个月合并中度至轻度偏瘫采用随机数字发生器随机分为两组.他们使用行动研究手臂测试进行了测试,上肢FuglMeyer评估,培训前后中风影响量表和内在动机量表。使用由游戏系统生成的时间戳来测量粘附性。受试者在家中放置了家庭虚拟康复系统(QiuinJNeuroengRehabil17:1-10,2020),并被教导使用它进行康复游戏。受试者被指示每天训练二十分钟,但被允许训练与他们选择的一样多。受试者在没有预约的情况下接受了12周的培训,并接受了研究人员的间歇性支持。使用方差分析比较组结果。主题人口统计学和依从性之间的相关性,以及运动结果,使用皮尔逊相关系数进行评估。
    结果:有5例患者退出,无不良事件。时间的主要影响对于五个临床结果指标中的四个具有统计学意义。在时间互动方面没有明显的训练组。两组之间的依从性测量没有显着差异。合并组的UEFMA得分平均提高了5.85(95%CI4.73-6.98)。两组中有21名受试者证明UEFMA得分至少提高了5分,超过4.25的最小临床重要差异。培训前后IMI得分稳定。
    结论:与游戏难度的算法控制相比,基于游戏的康复过程中的支架挑战并未引起更高的依从性。在家中进行基于游戏的治疗的两个稀疏监督程序都足以引起统计学上的显着影响,临床上有意义的运动功能和日常生活活动的改善。
    背景:临床试验.gov-NCT03985761,2019年6月14日注册。
    BACKGROUND: This parallel, randomized controlled trial examined intrinsic motivation, adherence and motor function improvement demonstrated by two groups of subjects that performed a 12-week, home-based upper extremity rehabilitation program. Seventeen subjects played scaffolded games, presenting eight to twelve discrete levels of increasing difficulty. Sixteen subjects performed the same activities controlled by success algorithms that modify game difficulty incrementally.
    METHODS: 33 persons 20-80 years of age, at least 6 months post stroke with moderate to mild hemiparesis were randomized using a random number generator into the two groups. They were tested using the Action Research Arm Test, Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer Assessment, Stroke Impact Scale and Intrinsic Motivation Inventory pre and post training. Adherence was measured using timestamps generated by the gaming system. Subjects had the Home Virtual Rehabilitation System (Qiu in J Neuroeng Rehabil 17: 1-10, 2020) placed in their homes and were taught to perform rehabilitation games using it. Subjects were instructed to train twenty minutes per day but were allowed to train as much as they chose. Subjects trained for 12 weeks without appointments and received intermittent support from study staff. Group outcomes were compared using ANOVA. Correlations between subject demographics and adherence, as well as motor outcome, were evaluated using Pearson Correlation Coefficients.
    RESULTS: There were 5 dropouts and no adverse events. The main effect of time was statistically significant for four of the five clinical outcome measures. There were no significant training group by time interactions. Measures of adherence did not differ significantly between groups. The combined groups improved their UEFMA scores on average by 5.85 (95% CI 4.73-6.98). 21 subjects from both groups demonstrating improvements in UEFMA scores of at least 5 points, exceeding the minimal clinically important difference of 4.25. IMI scores were stable pre to post training.
    CONCLUSIONS: Scaffolding challenges during game based rehabilitation did not elicit higher levels of adherence when compared to algorithm control of game difficulty. Both sparsely supervised programs of game-based treatment in the home were sufficient to elicit statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvements in motor function and activities of daily living.
    BACKGROUND: Clinical Trials.gov-NCT03985761, Registered June 14, 2019.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估实施自我管理干预以改善脑卒中幸存者社区行动能力的可行性。
    方法:采用两阶段序贯混合方法设计(一项试点随机对照试验和焦点组)。参与者是出院后六个月内的成年卒中幸存者,具有自我管理的功能和认知能力。干预包括教育会议,目标设定和行动计划,小组会议,自我监测和跟进。对照组接受常规护理,两组均参加3个月的研究。可行性结果(招聘和保留率,随机化和盲法,坚持干预,收集结果衡量标准,以及干预的保真度和可接受性)。参与者在基线评估,3个月和6个月的功能性活动和步行,自我效能感,实现目标,认知能力,和一般健康。对定量数据进行描述性分析,对定性数据进行内容分析。对定量和定性数据的结果进行整合,以呈现研究的最终结果。
    结果:招募24名参与者并随机分为两组(每组12名)。从医院和社区招募人员并远程提供干预措施是可行的。随机化和盲法是成功的。参与者在3个月时保留(83%),在6个月时保留(79.2%)。对干预的坚持因多种因素而异。焦点小组讨论了参与者加入该计划的动机,他们对干预(保真度和可接受性)和方法论的看法,移动性的感知改进,自我管理的促进者和挑战,和改进建议。
    结论:自我管理干预对于社区卒中幸存者来说似乎是可行的。与会者赞赏提供的支持,并认为他们的流动性有所改善。该研究的动力不足以得出有关该计划有效性的结论,因此有必要进行未来的全面研究。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of implementing a self-management intervention to improve mobility in the community for stroke survivors.
    METHODS: A two-phase sequential mixed methods design was used (a pilot randomised controlled trial and focus groups). Participants were adult stroke survivors within six months post discharge from hospital with functional and cognitive capacity for self-management. The intervention included education sessions, goal setting and action planning, group sessions, self-monitoring and follow up. The control group received usual care and both groups enrolled for 3 months in the study. Feasibility outcomes (recruitment and retention rates, randomisation and blinding, adherence to the intervention, collection of outcome measures, and the fidelity and acceptability of the intervention). Participants assessed at baseline, 3 months and 6 months for functional mobility and walking, self-efficacy, goal attainment, cognitive ability, and general health. A descriptive analysis was done for quantitative data and content analysis for the qualitative data. Findings of quantitative and qualitative data were integrated to present the final results of the study.
    RESULTS: Twenty-four participants were recruited and randomised into two groups (12 each). It was feasible to recruit from hospital and community and to deliver the intervention remotely. Randomisation and blinding were successful. Participants were retained (83%) at 3 months and (79.2%) at 6 months assessments. Adherence to the intervention varied due to multiple factors. Focus groups discussed participants\' motivations for joining the programme, their perspectives on the intervention (fidelity and acceptability) and methodology, perceived improvements in mobility, facilitators and challenges for self-management, and suggestions for improvement.
    CONCLUSIONS: The self-management intervention seems feasible for implementation for stroke survivors in the community. Participants appreciated the support provided and perceived improvement in their mobility. The study was not powered enough to draw a conclusion about the efficacy of the program and a future full-scale study is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    将机器学习(ML)与步态分析相结合,可广泛用于诊断异常步态模式。
    分析中风患者的步态适应性特征,开发ML模型来识别GAD个体,并选择最优诊断模型和关键分类特征。
    这项研究对30名中风患者进行了调查(平均年龄42.69岁,60%男性)和50名健康成年人(平均年龄41.34岁,58%男性)。使用CMill跑步机对步态适应任务进行了步态适应性评估:目标踏步,激流回旋行走,避障,速度适应。采用t检验和Pearson相关性对两组变量进行初步分析。从人口统计中提取特征,步态运动学,和步态适应性数据集。基于支持向量机的机器学习模型,决策树,多层感知器,K-最近的邻居,和AdaCost算法被训练来对有和没有GAD的个体进行分类。使用精度(ACC)评估模型性能,灵敏度(SEN),F1分数和接受者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)。
    中风组的步态速度(p=0.000)和步长(SL)(p=0.000)显着降低,与健康组相比,SL(p=0.000)和ST(p=0.000)的不对称性更高。在激流回旋中步态适应任务显著减少(p=0.000),避障(p=0.000),和速度自适应(p=0.000)。脑卒中患者的步态速度(p=0.000)和避障(p=0.000)与总体F-A评分显著相关。AdaCost表现出更好的分类性能,ACC为0.85,SEN为0.80,F1评分为0.77,ROC-AUC为0.75。在此模型中,避障和步态速度被确定为关键特征。
    卒中患者行走速度较慢,SL较短,SL和ST更不对称。他们的步态适应性下降,特别是在避障和速度适应。更快的步态速度和更好的避障与更好的功能移动性相关。AdaCost识别患有GAD的个体并促进临床决策。这促进了用户友好界面和计算机辅助诊断系统的未来发展。
    UNASSIGNED: Combining machine learning (ML) with gait analysis is widely applicable for diagnosing abnormal gait patterns.
    UNASSIGNED: To analyze gait adaptability characteristics in stroke patients, develop ML models to identify individuals with GAD, and select optimal diagnostic models and key classification features.
    UNASSIGNED: This study was investigated with 30 stroke patients (mean age 42.69 years, 60% male) and 50 healthy adults (mean age 41.34 years, 58% male). Gait adaptability was assessed using a CMill treadmill on gait adaptation tasks: target stepping, slalom walking, obstacle avoidance, and speed adaptation. The preliminary analysis of variables in both groups was conducted using t-tests and Pearson correlation. Features were extracted from demographics, gait kinematics, and gait adaptability datasets. ML models based on Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, Multi-layer Perceptron, K-Nearest Neighbors, and AdaCost algorithm were trained to classify individuals with and without GAD. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), F1-score and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC).
    UNASSIGNED: The stroke group showed a significantly decreased gait speed (p = 0.000) and step length (SL) (p = 0.000), while the asymmetry of SL (p = 0.000) and ST (p = 0.000) was higher compared to the healthy group. The gait adaptation tasks significantly decreased in slalom walking (p = 0.000), obstacle avoidance (p = 0.000), and speed adaptation (p = 0.000). Gait speed (p = 0.000) and obstacle avoidance (p = 0.000) were significantly correlated with global F-A score in stroke patients. The AdaCost demonstrated better classification performance with an ACC of 0.85, SEN of 0.80, F1-score of 0.77, and ROC-AUC of 0.75. Obstacle avoidance and gait speed were identified as critical features in this model.
    UNASSIGNED: Stroke patients walk slower with shorter SL and more asymmetry of SL and ST. Their gait adaptability was decreased, particularly in obstacle avoidance and speed adaptation. The faster gait speed and better obstacle avoidance were correlated with better functional mobility. The AdaCost identifies individuals with GAD and facilitates clinical decision-making. This advances the future development of user-friendly interfaces and computer-aided diagnosis systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:包括中风在内的神经系统疾病患者使用康复来改善认知能力,恢复运动功能并降低进一步并发症的风险。已经开发了机器人辅助倾斜台技术,以提供早期动员和涉及下肢的自动化治疗。这项研究的目的是评估中风后患者在机器人辅助的倾斜台运动中采用心率(HR)反馈控制系统的可行性。
    方法:本可行性研究以病例系列的形式设计,包括12例患者(n=12),不限制卒中后时间或卒中后损害严重程度。机器人辅助的倾斜台增加了力传感器,工作率估计算法,和一个生物反馈屏幕,促进了对目标工作率的自愿控制。在系统辨识测试中估计了HR对目标工作率变化的响应的动态模型;使用标称模型来计算旨在给出指定闭环带宽的反馈控制器的参数;在反馈控制测试中定量评估了HR控制的准确性。
    结果:对所有12例患者均成功进行了反馈控制测试。以每分钟2.16次搏动(bpm)的平均均方根(RMS)模型误差估计心率对施加的工作率的动态模型,同时实现了心率的高度精确反馈控制,平均RMS跟踪误差(RMSE)为2.00bpm。控制精度,即RMSE,发现与心率变异性(HRV)的幅度密切相关:HRV幅度较低的患者具有较低的RMSE,即更准确的人力资源控制性能,反之亦然。
    结论:在机器人辅助的倾斜台运动中对心率进行反馈控制是可行的。未来的工作应该研究反馈控制系统的鲁棒性方面。对锻炼方式的修改,或替代模式,应该进行探索,以实现更高水平的工作率和心率强度。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with neurological disorders including stroke use rehabilitation to improve cognitive abilities, to regain motor function and to reduce the risk of further complications. Robotics-assisted tilt table technology has been developed to provide early mobilisation and to automate therapy involving the lower limbs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of employing a feedback control system for heart rate (HR) during robotics-assisted tilt table exercise in patients after a stroke.
    METHODS: This feasibility study was designed as a case series with 12 patients ( n = 12 ) with no restriction on the time post-stroke or on the degree of post-stroke impairment severity. A robotics-assisted tilt table was augmented with force sensors, a work rate estimation algorithm, and a biofeedback screen that facilitated volitional control of a target work rate. Dynamic models of HR response to changes in target work rate were estimated in system identification tests; nominal models were used to calculate the parameters of feedback controllers designed to give a specified closed-loop bandwidth; and the accuracy of HR control was assessed quantitatively in feedback control tests.
    RESULTS: Feedback control tests were successfully conducted in all 12 patients. Dynamic models of heart rate response to imposed work rate were estimated with a mean root-mean-square (RMS) model error of 2.16 beats per minute (bpm), while highly accurate feedback control of heart rate was achieved with a mean RMS tracking error (RMSE) of 2.00 bpm. Control accuracy, i.e. RMSE, was found to be strongly correlated with the magnitude of heart rate variability (HRV): patients with a low magnitude of HRV had low RMSE, i.e. more accurate HR control performance, and vice versa.
    CONCLUSIONS: Feedback control of heart rate during robotics-assisted tilt table exercise was found to be feasible. Future work should investigate robustness aspects of the feedback control system. Modifications to the exercise modality, or alternative modalities, should be explored that allow higher levels of work rate and heart rate intensity to be achieved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    功能性电刺激(FES)可以支持中风后瘫痪肢体的功能恢复。Hebbian可塑性取决于突触前和突触后活动的时间重合。假设与尝试运动相关的运动皮层(MC)活动与FES生成的视觉本体感受反馈之间存在紧密的时间关系,以增强运动恢复。使用脑机接口(BCI)对脑电图(EEG)信号中的MC频谱功率进行分类,以通过检测运动尝试来触发FES传递,从而改善了慢性中风患者的运动结果。我们假设卒中后早期神经可塑性增强将进一步增强皮质醇功能连接和运动恢复。我们比较了BCI-FES和Random-FES(在时间上与MC运动尝试检测无关的FES)组中的皮质下非优势半球中风患者。主要结果指标是Fugl-Meyer评估,上肢(FMA-UE)。我们记录了治疗前后的高密度脑电图和经颅磁刺激诱发的运动诱发电位。BCI组显示更大:FMA-UE改善;运动诱发电位幅度;β振荡功率和对侧MC的长期时间相关性降低;以及与对侧MC的皮质粒相干性。当运动与反映尝试运动的MC活动同步时,这些变化与增强的行程后运动改善相一致。
    Functional electrical stimulation (FES) can support functional restoration of a paretic limb post-stroke. Hebbian plasticity depends on temporally coinciding pre- and post-synaptic activity. A tight temporal relationship between motor cortical (MC) activity associated with attempted movement and FES-generated visuo-proprioceptive feedback is hypothesized to enhance motor recovery. Using a brain-computer interface (BCI) to classify MC spectral power in electroencephalographic (EEG) signals to trigger FES-delivery with detection of movement attempts improved motor outcomes in chronic stroke patients. We hypothesized that heightened neural plasticity earlier post-stroke would further enhance corticomuscular functional connectivity and motor recovery. We compared subcortical non-dominant hemisphere stroke patients in BCI-FES and Random-FES (FES temporally independent of MC movement attempt detection) groups. The primary outcome measure was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). We recorded high-density EEG and transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials before and after treatment. The BCI group showed greater: FMA-UE improvement; motor evoked potential amplitude; beta oscillatory power and long-range temporal correlation reduction over contralateral MC; and corticomuscular coherence with contralateral MC. These changes are consistent with enhanced post-stroke motor improvement when movement is synchronized with MC activity reflecting attempted movement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号