stable ischemic heart disease

稳定性缺血性心脏病
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大约30%至50%的被转诊为诊断性冠状动脉造影的患者没有阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)。缺血和非梗阻性冠状动脉(INOCA)越来越被认可,包括冠状动脉微血管功能障碍,血管痉挛型心绞痛,有症状的心肌桥,和其他血管舒缩障碍。然而,这些疾病的患病率以及潜在的动脉粥样硬化斑块负荷和形态是否影响每种生理表型的长期结局尚不清楚.
    DISCOVERINOCA注册正在美国的8个中心进行,并计划招募500名缺血性心脏病患者接受冠状动脉功能检查(CFT)的血管造影术。所有参与者将完成患者报告的结果测量,并接受协议引导的血管造影,乙酰胆碱激发,冠状动脉热稀释,和血管内成像。随访评估发生在30天,6个月,1年,每年5年。主要短期终点是基于生理学的INOCA表型的患病率和基于血管内超声或光学相干断层扫描(血管内成像)的动脉粥样硬化程度。主要的长期终点是主要不良心血管事件的发生率,定义为心血管死亡的复合物,心肌梗塞,因心血管原因住院,或冠状动脉血运重建在5年的随访。在此发布时,已有100名参与者参加。
    DISCOVERINOCA是首例针对INOCA患者的前瞻性研究,旨在整合疾病的解剖和生理指标,并将其与长期结局相关联。发现INOCA将报告INOCA表型的患病率,全面侵入性CFT的安全性,以及测试对诊断和药物治疗的影响。长期随访的症状和心血管不良事件将在接受血管造影的无阻塞性CAD患者中确定。
    UNASSIGNED: Approximately 30% to 50% of patients who are referred for diagnostic coronary angiography are found to have no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) is increasingly recognized and encompasses coronary microvascular dysfunction, vasospastic angina, symptomatic myocardial bridging, and other vasomotor disorders. However, the prevalence of these disorders and whether underlying atherosclerotic plaque burden and morphology affect the long-term outcomes of each physiologic phenotype is unknown.
    UNASSIGNED: The DISCOVER INOCA registry is ongoing at 8 centers in the United States and plans to enroll 500 patients with ischemic heart disease referred for angiography undergoing coronary function testing (CFT). All participants will complete patient-reported outcome measures and undergo protocol-guided angiography, acetylcholine provocation, coronary thermodilution, and intravascular imaging. Follow-up assessments occur at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and annually for 5 years. The primary short-term end point is the prevalence of INOCA phenotypes based on physiology and the degree of atherosclerosis based on intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography (intravascular imaging). The primary long-term end point is the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for cardiovascular causes, or coronary revascularization at a follow-up of 5 years. At the time of this publication, 100 participants have been enrolled.
    UNASSIGNED: DISCOVER INOCA is the first prospective study of INOCA patients to integrate anatomic and physiologic measures of disease and correlate them with long-term outcomes. DISCOVER INOCA will report on the prevalence of INOCA phenotypes, the safety of comprehensive invasive CFT, and the impact of testing on diagnoses and medical therapy. Symptoms and cardiovascular adverse events at long-term follow-up will be determined in patients with no obstructive CAD undergoing angiography.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在稳定性缺血性心脏病和急性冠脉综合征患者中,使用药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,建议使用阿司匹林和P2Y12抑制剂的双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)至少持续6个月和12个月。分别。额外暴露于抗血小板治疗可减少缺血事件,但也会增加出血风险。相反,在高出血风险人群中,较短的DAPT是首选.因此,关于血运重建后DAPT持续时间的决定应包括临床判断,评估出血和缺血事件的风险,和血运重建后的时间。
    Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is recommended for at least 6 and 12 months following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents among patients with stable ischemic heart disease and acute coronary syndrome, respectively. Additional exposure to antiplatelet therapy reduces ischemic events but also increases bleeding risk. Conversely, shorter durations of DAPT are preferred among those at high bleeding risk. Hence, decisions surrounding duration of DAPT after revascularization should include clinical judgment, assessment of the risk of bleeding and ischemic events, and time after revascularization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高血压和血脂异常是稳定型缺血性心脏病患者中2种高度流行和可改变的危险因素。多项证据表明,降低血压和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇可改善缺血性心脏病患者的临床预后。因此,临床指南建议对这些高危患者进行强化治疗.本文总结了病理生理学,支持证据,以及对明显缺血性心脏病患者高血压和血脂异常管理的治疗建议,并指出未来的研究和未满足的临床需求。
    Hypertension and dyslipidemia are 2 highly prevalent and modifiable risk factors in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. Multiple lines of evidence demonstrate that lowering blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol improves clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic heart disease. Accordingly, clinical guidelines recommend intensive treatment targets for these high-risk patients. This article summarizes the pathophysiology, supporting evidence, and treatment recommendations for management of hypertension and dyslipidemia among patients with manifest ischemic heart disease and points to future research and unmet clinical needs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在出现提示阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的症状的患者的检查中,功能测试与解剖测试具有独特的优势和劣势。对这些人的评估始于对测试前概率的评估,它指导后续的测试决策。解剖和功能测试之间的选择取决于该预测试概率。总的来说,解剖检测在年轻人和女性中特别有用;而功能检测可有助于排除缺血并指导血运重建决策.最终,选择最合适的测试应根据患者和临床情况进行个性化选择.
    There are unique advantages and disadvantages to functional versus anatomic testing in the work-up of patients who present with symptoms suggestive of obstructive coronary artery disease. Evaluation of these individuals starts with an assessment of pre-test probability, which guides subsequent testing decisions. The choice between anatomic and functional testing depends on this pre-test probability. In general, anatomic testing has particular utility among younger individuals and women; while functional testing can be helpful to rule-in ischemia and guide revascularization decisions. Ultimately, selection of the most appropriate test should be individualized to the patient and clinical scenario.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    心肌灌注显像是评估慢性冠状动脉疾病(CCD)的一种流行的微创方法。我们进行了心肌闪烁显像,以评估一名对造影剂过敏的74岁男性的CCD。患者在服用the(99mTc)-tetrofosmin制剂后立即出现过敏性休克。这是心肌灌注闪烁显像过程中使用99mTc-tetrofosmin引起的过敏性休克的第一份报告。
    Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy is a popular minimally invasive method for evaluating chronic coronary disease (CCD). We performed myocardial scintigraphy to assess CCD in a 74-year-old man with a history of allergy to contrast media. The patient developed anaphylactic shock immediately after the administration of the technetium (99mTc)-tetrofosmin preparation. This is the first report of anaphylactic shock due to 99mTc-tetrofosmin administration during myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:药物治疗,包括抗心绞痛治疗,是稳定缺血性心脏病(SIHD)管理的基石。然而,目前尚不清楚联合抗心绞痛药物是否在生活质量(QoL)和心血管结局方面提供了超越单药治疗的益处。方法:我们利用了BARI-2D试验的数据,比较了SIHD和糖尿病患者的心血管和QoL结局,这些患者随机分为强化药物治疗或单纯强化药物治疗的血运重建。我们将患者分为三组:≥2vs.1vs.0抗心绞痛。我们比较了患者特征,QoL指标,基线和5年时的心血管终点,创建多变量模型来调整关键临床混杂因素结果:在2,368例患者中,348例(14.7%)患者使用0种抗心绞痛药物,1,020例患者(43.1%)使用1抗心绞痛,1,000名患者(42.2%)在基线时使用≥2种抗心绞痛药物。最常见的抗心绞痛类是β受体阻滞剂。在基线,0抗心绞痛患者的QoL指标更好(自我健康评分,杜克活动状态指数,和能量等级)高于≥2种抗心绞痛药的患者。然而,在1年的随访中,仅服用1次抗心绞痛的患者比服用0次抗心绞痛的患者表现出更大的QoL改善,在服用≥2种抗心绞痛药的患者中,QoL指标没有任何增量益处,即使在调整了多个协变量如年龄之后,心力衰竭,糖尿病控制,和心肌危险指数.最后,在5年的随访中,调整后,全因死亡率没有差异,主要不良心血管事件,在服用不同数量的抗心绞痛药的患者之间或心肌梗死。结论:在一年的随访中,与使用两种或更多种抗心绞痛药相比,使用单一抗心绞痛药治疗SIHD和糖尿病的成年人的QoL改善相似或更好。这些发现值得进一步研究,以更好地了解药物治疗强度对SIHD和相关合并症患者QoL的影响。
    Medical therapy, including antianginal treatment, is the cornerstone in the management of stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). However, it remains unclear whether combining antianginal agents provides benefits beyond monotherapy in terms of quality of life (QoL) and cardiovascular outcomes. We used data from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial, which compared cardiovascular and QoL outcomes in patients with SIHD and diabetes mellitus randomized to revascularization with intensive medical therapy or intensive medical therapy alone. We categorized patients into 3 groups: ≥2 versus 1 versus 0 antianginals. We compared patient characteristics, QoL metrics, and cardiovascular end points at baseline and at 5 years, creating a multivariable model to adjust for key clinical confounders. Of 2,368 patients, 348 patients (14.7%) were on 0 antianginals, 1,020 patients (43.1%) were on 1 antianginal, and 1,000 patients (42.2%) were on ≥2 antianginals at baseline. The most common antianginal class was β blockers. At baseline, patients on 0 antianginals had better QoL metrics (self-health score, Duke activity status index, and energy rating) than patients on ≥2 antianginals. However, at the 1-year follow-up, patients taking only 1 antianginal showed greater QoL improvement than those taking 0 antianginal, without any incremental benefit in QoL metrics seen in patients taking ≥2 antianginal agents, even after adjusting for multiple covariates such as age, heart failure, diabetes control, and myocardial jeopardy index. Lastly, at the 5-year follow-up, after adjustment, there were no differences in all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, or myocardial infarction between patients taking different numbers of antianginals. Adults on a single antianginal for SIHD and diabetes mellitus had similar or better improvements in QoL than those on 2 or more antianginal agents at 1 year of follow-up. These findings merit further research to better understand the impact of medical therapy intensity on QoL in patients with SIHD and associated co-morbidities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Preprint
    CYP2C19功能丧失(LOF)等位基因降低了急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后氯吡格雷的抗血小板作用。基因型对稳定性缺血性心脏病(SIHD)的影响尚不清楚。
    确定CYP2C19基因型与ACS或SIHDPCI后主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的相关性。
    百万退伍军人计划(MVP)参与者年龄<65岁,在VA临床评估中记录了PCI,纳入2009年1月1日至2017年9月30日用氯吡格雷治疗的报告和追踪(CART)计划。MACE定义为全因死亡的复合物,PCI术后12个月内发生卒中或心肌梗死。
    在4,461名退伍军人中(平均年龄59.1±5.1岁,18%黑色);44%患有ACS,56%患有SIHD,29%携带CYP2C19LOF等位基因。301例患者(6.7%)在接受氯吡格雷治疗时出现MACE,ACS组155例(7.9%),SIHD组146例(5.9%)。总的来说,LOF携带者之间的MACE没有显着差异。非携带者(调整后的风险比[HR]1.18,置信区间[95CI]0.97-1.45,p=0.096)。在ACS患者中,LOF携带者与非携带者相比,MACE风险在数值上较高(HR1.30,95CI0.98-1.73,p=0.067)。SIHD患者的MACE风险没有差异(HR1.09,95CI0.82-1.44;p=0.565)。
    在PCI后接受氯吡格雷治疗的ACS患者的CYP2C19LOF携带者发生MACE事件的风险增加。CYP2C19LOF基因型在SIHD患者中与MACE无关。
    UNASSIGNED: CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) alleles decrease the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The impact of genotype in stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) is unclear.
    UNASSIGNED: Determine the association of CYP2C19 genotype with major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after PCI for ACS or SIHD.
    UNASSIGNED: Million Veterans Program (MVP) participants age <65 years with a PCI documented in the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting and Tracking (CART) Program between 1/1/2009 to 9/30/2017, treated with clopidogrel were included. Time to MACE defined as the composite of all-cause death, stroke or myocardial infarction within 12 months following PCI.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 4,461 Veterans (mean age 59.1 ± 5.1 years, 18% Black); 44% had ACS, 56% had SIHD and 29% carried a CYP2C19 LOF allele. 301 patients (6.7%) experienced MACE while being treated with clopidogrel, 155 (7.9%) in the ACS group and 146 (5.9%) in the SIHD group. Overall, MACE was not significantly different between LOF carriers vs. noncarriers (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.18, confidence interval [95%CI] 0.97-1.45, p=0.096). Among patients presenting with ACS, MACE risk in LOF carriers versus non-carriers was numerically higher (HR 1.30, 95%CI 0.98-1.73, p=0.067). There was no difference in MACE risk in patients with SIHD (HR 1.09, 95%CI 0.82-1.44; p=0.565).
    UNASSIGNED: CYP2C19 LOF carriers presenting with ACS treated with clopidogrel following PCI experienced a numerically greater elevated risk of MACE events. CYP2C19 LOF genotype is not associated with MACE among patients presenting with SIHD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在稳定性缺血性心脏病(SIHD)中,解剖严重的左主干(LMCA)狭窄(>50%)仍然是少数受益于早期血运重建的人群之一。通过广泛可用的非侵入性测试来识别这些患者将减少对额外的前期解剖测试的需要。降低医疗保健的整体成本。在我们机构进行了7年的经皮或手术血运重建的SIHD患者进行了回顾性分析,并分为LMCA狭窄与非LM狭窄。所有之前的非侵入性测试,包括静息心电图,超声心动图,两组之间使用卡方和t检验进行评估和比较。总的来说,对806例患者进行了评估。其中,在非LM队列中,有685名患者被确定为有明显的LMCA狭窄。在LMCA与非LM队列之间,心电图异常的发生率相似(68.9%vs70.8%,P>0.05),超声心动图异常(72.7%vs69.7%,P>0.05),异常功能测试(83.3%vs77.4%,P>0.05),和高风险影像学检查结果(5.6%vs4.8%,p>0.05)。更重要的是,那些有完整检查的人,LMCA组(18个中的3个,16.7%)与非LM狭窄组(189个中的9个,4.8%)的正常结果相似.IHD患者的全面非侵入性特征未能识别或排除解剖学上严重的LMCA狭窄患者。需要进行解剖评估。
    Anatomically severe left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis (>50%) remains one of the few groups to benefit from early revascularization in stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). Identification of these patients through widely available noninvasive testing would decrease the need for additional upfront anatomic testing, lowering the overall cost of healthcare. Patients with SIHD who underwent either percutaneous or surgical revascularization over a 7-year period at our institution were retrospectively analyzed and categorized as having LMCA stenosis versus non-LM stenosis. All preceding noninvasive testing, including resting electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and functional testing was evaluated and compared between groups using chi-square and t test. In total, 806 patients were evaluated. Of those, 121 were identified as having significant LMCA stenosis with 685 patients in the non-LM cohort. Between LMCA versus non-LM cohorts, there were similar rates of electrocardiogram abnormalities (68.9% vs 70.8%, p >0.05), abnormal echocardiograms (72.7% vs 69.7%, p >0.05), abnormal functional testing (83.3% vs 77.4%, p >0.05), and high-risk imaging findings (5.6% vs 4.8%, p >0.05). More importantly, of those with a complete workup, there were similar rates of normal results between the LMCA (3 of 18, 16.7%) and non-LM stenosis (9 of 189, 4.8%) groups. A comprehensive noninvasive profile of patients with IHD failed to identify or exclude patients with anatomically severe LMCA stenosis, necessitating anatomic assessment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号