OBJECTIVE: Racial and socioeconomic disparities in spine surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis persist in the United States, potentially contributing to unequal health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes. This is important as lumbar spondylolisthesis is one of the most common causes of surgical low back pain, and low back pain is the largest disabler of individuals worldwide. Our objective was to assess the relationship between race, socioeconomic factors, treatment utilization, and outcomes in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.
METHODS: This cohort study analyzed prospectively collected data from 9941 patients diagnosed with lumbar spondylolisthesis between 2015 and 2020 at 5 academic hospitals. Exposures were race, socioeconomic status, health coverage, and HRQoL measures. Main outcomes and measures included treatment utilization rates between racial groups and the association between race and treatment outcomes using logistic regression, adjusting for patient characteristics, socioeconomic status, health coverage, and HRQoL measures.
RESULTS: Of the 9941 patients included (mean [SD] age, 67.37 [12.40] years; 63% female; 1101 [11.1%] Black, Indigenous, and People of Color [BIPOC]), BIPOC patients were significantly less likely to use surgery than White patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.62-0.75). Furthermore, BIPOC race was associated with significantly lower odds of reaching the minimum clinically important difference for physical function (OR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60; 0.91) and pain interference (OR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.97). Medicaid beneficiaries were significantly less likely (OR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.92) to reach a clinically important improvement in HRQoL when accounting for race.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found that BIPOC patients were less likely to use spine surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis despite reporting higher pain interference, suggesting an association between race and surgical utilization. These disparities may contribute to unequal HRQoL outcomes for patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis and warrant further investigation to address and reduce treatment disparities.

BACKGROUND The proper installation for pedicle screws by the traditional method of surgeons dependent on experience is not guaranteed, and educational solutions have progressed from chalkboards to electronic teaching platforms. We designed a case of 3-dimensional printing drill guide template as a surgical application, which can accurately navigate implantation of pedicle screws, and assessed its effect for simulative training. MATERIAL AND METHODS We randomly selected a set of computed tomography data for spondylolisthesis. A navigational template of pedicles and screws was designed by software Mimics and Pro-E, where trajectories of directions and angles guiding the nail way were manipulated for screwing based on anatomy, and its solid model was fabricated by a BT600 3D printer. The screws were integrated and installed to observe their stability. RESULTS The navigational model and custom spine implants were examined to be compatibly immobilized, because they are tolerant to radiation and stable against hydrolysis. The screw size and template were fit accurately to the vertebrae intraosseously, because the pilot holes were drilled and the trajectories were guided by cannulas with visible routes. During the surgical workflow, the patient reported appreciation and showed substantial compliance, while having few complications with this approach. Compared with fluoroscopy-assisted or free-hand techniques, the effect of simulative training during processing was excellent. CONCLUSIONS The surgical biomodel is practical for the procedural accuracy of surgical guides or as an educational drill. This fostering a style of \"practice substituting for teaching\" sets a paragon of keeping up with time and is worthy of recommendation.

Around a third of all cervical spine injuries occur in the upper cervical spine in the area between the occiput and the second cervical vertebra. The latter being the most common location of the injury with around 70%. But also atlas fractures, occipital condyle fractures, traumatic spondylolisthesis of C2, atypical fractures in the corpus area as well as atlantooccipital and atlantoaxial ligamentous lesions should be mentioned in connection with injuries in this area. In many cases, conservative therapy regimen is possible. In unstable or displaced injuries, however, surgical intervention is required, with various surgical procedures being used. The frequency, diagnostics, classification, and standard therapy of the individual entities are presented in detail in this continuing medical education article.

暂无摘要。

To assess whether decompression alone is non-inferior to decompression with instrumented fusion five years after primary surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Five year follow-up of a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial (Nordsten-DS).
16 public orthopaedic and neurosurgical clinics in Norway.
Patients aged 18-80 years with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and a spondylolisthesis of 3 mm or more at the stenotic level.
Decompression surgery alone and decompression with additional instrumented fusion (1:1).
The primary outcome was a 30% or more reduction in Oswestry disability index from baseline to five year follow-up. The predefined non-inferiority margin was a -15 percentage point difference in the proportion of patients who met the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the mean change in Oswestry disability index, Zurich claudication questionnaire, numeric rating scale for leg and back pain, and EuroQol Group 5-Dimension (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire.
From 12 February 2014 to 18 December 2017, 267 participants were randomly assigned to decompression alone (n=134) and decompression with instrumented fusion (n=133). Of these, 230 (88%) responded to the five year questionnaire: 121 in the decompression group and 109 in the fusion group. Mean age at baseline was 66.2 years (SD 7.6), and 69% were women. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis with multiple imputation of missing data, 84 (63%) of 133 people in the decompression alone group and 81 (63%) of 129 people in the fusion group had a at least a 30% reduction in Oswestry disability index, a difference of 0.4 percentage points. (95% confidence interval (CI) -11.2 to 11.9). The respective results of the per protocol analysis were 65 (65%) of 100 in the decompression alone group and 59 (66%) of 89 in the fusion group, a difference of -1.3 percentage points (95% CI -14.5 to 12.2). Both 95% CIs were higher than the predefined non-inferiority margin of -15%. The mean change in Oswestry disability index from baseline to five years was -17.8 in both groups (mean difference 0.02 (95% CI -3.8 to 3.9)). Results of the other secondary outcomes were in the same direction as the primary outcome. From two to five year follow-up, a new lumbar operation occurred in six (5%) of 123 people in the decompression group and 11 (10%) of 113 people in the fusion group, with a total from baseline to five years of 21 (16%) of 129 people and 23 (18%) of 125, respectively.
In participants with degenerative spondylolisthesis, decompression alone was non-inferior to decompression with instrumented fusion five years after primary surgery. Proportions of subsequent surgeries at the index level or an adjacent lumbar level were no different between the groups.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02051374.

Neck injury fractures are commonly associated with high-impact trauma, such as motor vehicle accidents or falls from heights. However, this case underscores that it is possible to sustain such a fracture even from minor falls. As of now, there are no such reported cases. This case report highlights the importance of a thorough medical history when assessing patients with neck pain following falls. A 59-year-old male experienced a fainting episode after suffering from vomiting and diarrhea, resulting in him hitting his head. The patient attributed his neck pain to a sudden twisting of his neck. The pain originated from the base of his skull, primarily on the left side, extending to the scalp and the left shoulder. After enduring four days of intense pain that limited his ability to rotate his neck and bend to tie his shoes, he sought medical attention and underwent a neck CT scan, which led to the diagnosis of a \"hangman\'s fracture.\" This injury was diagnosed in a clinical setting. Healthcare providers should inquire about the circumstances of the fall, the patient\'s position, associated symptoms, and any relevant pre-existing conditions. This approach ensures an accurate diagnosis and timely treatment. Comprehensive history-taking is essential for identifying high-risk situations and preventing complications that may arise from overlooked minor falls, ultimately enhancing patient safety, especially in cases of neck and spine injuries.

OBJECTIVE: The Femoro-Sacral Posterior Angle (FSPA) system and the pelvic incidence (PI) system are utilized for measuring sagittal spino-pelvic morphology in patients with high-dysplastic developmental spondylolisthesis (HDDS). This study aimed to analyze the accuracy and stability of these two systems.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 45 patients diagnosed with HDDS who underwent surgical treatment at our hospital (HDDS group), along with 45 patients without spondylolisthesis (normal group). Three orthopedic surgeons utilized the FSPA and PI systems to measure various parameters, including FSPA, pelvic angle(PA), sacral incidence (SI), PI, pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS), respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was employed to assess the inter-observer consistency of measurements.
RESULTS: There was significant differences in all the parameters between the normal and HDDS groups (p < 0.05), except for SS (p = 0.508). Specifically, SI was lower in HDDS group than in the normal group (23.0 ± 13.4 vs. 38.6 ± 7.1), whereas SS was higher (35.3 ± 15.7 vs. 33.6 ± 7.4). Within HDDS group, there was no statistically significant difference in PI (p = 0.159), SS (p = 0.319), and FSPA (p = 0.173) between pre- and post-surgery measurements. The ICC results indicated superior reliability for the FSPA system (0.842-0.885) compared to the PI system (0.682-0.720) within the HDDS group.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the PI system, the FSPA system demonstrated higher accuracy in evaluating spino-pelvic morphology in HDDS patients. Moreover, it exhibited higher ICC values, indicating higher inter-observer reliability, thus serving as an effective method for assessing spino-pelvic morphology in HDDS patients.

METHODS: A 62-year-old woman receiving romosozumab for 3 months underwent extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. From 1 week after surgery, she experienced gradually increasing pain from the right groin to the front of the thigh. Examination revealed ossifying myositis in bilateral psoas major muscles. Etidronate treatment was initiated, improving pain after 4 days. Computed tomography showed lesion disappearance by 3 months after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: We report a rare case of myositis ossificans in bilateral psoas major muscles following XLIF surgery, possibly influenced by intraoperative manipulation and romosozumab treatment. Etidronate administration may be effective, as with heterotopic ossification.

UNASSIGNED: The effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) compared to posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in patients with single-level spondylolisthesis has not been substantiated. To address the evidence gap, a well-powered randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing the effectiveness of TLIF with PLIF, entitled the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT), was conducted.
UNASSIGNED: In a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial among five Dutch hospitals, 161 patients were randomly allocated to either TLIF or PLIF (1:1), stratified according to study site. Patients and statisticians were blinded for group assignment. All patients were over 18 years old with symptomatic single-level degenerative, isthmic or iatrogenic lumbar spondylolisthesis, and eligible for lumbar interbody fusion surgery through a posterior approach. The primary outcome was change in disability measured with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) from preoperative to one year postoperative. The non-inferiority limit was set to 7.0 points based on the MCID of ODI. Secondary outcomes were change in quality-adjusted life years (QALY) assessed with EuroQol 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), as well as back and leg pain (Numerical rating scale, NRS), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale; HADS), perioperative blood loss, duration of surgery, duration of hospitalization, and complications. Trial registration: Netherlands Trial Registry, number 5722 (registration date March 30, 2016), Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT): A randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.
UNASSIGNED: Patients were included between August 2017 and November 2020. The total study population was 161 patients. Total loss-to-follow-up after one year was 16 patients. Per-protocol analysis included 66 patients in each group. In the TLIF group (mean age 61.6, 36 females), ODI improved from 46.7 to 20.7, whereas in the PLIF group (mean age 61.9, 41 females), it improved from 46.0 to 24.9. This difference (-4.9, 90% CI -12.2 to +2.4) did not reach the non-inferiority limit of 7.0 points in ODI. A significant difference in the secondary outcome measurement, QALY (SF-36), was observed in favor of TLIF (P < 0.05). However, this was not clinically relevant. No difference was found for all other secondary outcome measurements; PROMs (EQ-5D, NRS leg/back, HADS), perioperative blood loss, duration of surgery, duration of hospitalization, and perioperative and postoperative complications.
UNASSIGNED: For patients with single-level spondylolisthesis, TLIF is non-inferior to PLIF in terms of clinical effectiveness. Disability (measured with ODI) did not differ over time between groups.
UNASSIGNED: No funding was received for this trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine of the impact of ALIF with minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UPSF) versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF) on perioperative outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and the rates of fusion, subsidence, and adjacent segment stenosis.
METHODS: All adult patients who underwent one-level ALIF with UPSF or BPSF at an academic institution between 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively identified. Postoperative outcomes including length of hospital stay (LOS), wound complications, readmissions, and revisions were determined. The rates of fusion, screw loosening, adjacent segment stenosis, and subsidence were assessed on one-year postoperative CT. Lumbar alignment including lumbar lordosis, L4-S1 lordosis, regional lordosis, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and sacral slope were assessed on standing x-rays at preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final postoperative follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analysis compared outcomes across posterior fixation groups.
RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were included (27 UPSF, 33 BPSF). Patients with UPSF were significantly younger (p = 0.011). Operative time was significantly greater in the BPSF group in univariate (p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (ß=104.1, p < 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss, LOS, lordosis, pelvic parameters, fusion rate, subsidence, screw loosening, adjacent segment stenosis, and revision rate did not differ significantly between fixation groups. Though sacral slope (p = 0.037) was significantly greater in the BPSF group, fixation type was not a significant predictor on regression.
CONCLUSIONS: ALIF with UPSF relative to BPSF predicted decreased operative time but was not a significant predictor of postoperative outcomes. ALIF with UPSF can be considered to increase operative efficiency without compromising construct stability.