Epitranscriptomics is a field that delves into post-transcriptional changes. Among these modifications, the conversion of adenosine to inosine, traduced as guanosine (A>I(G)), is one of the known RNA-editing mechanisms, catalyzed by ADARs. This type of RNA editing is the most common type of editing in mammals and contributes to biological diversity. Disruption in the A>I(G) RNA-editing balance has been linked to diseases, including several types of cancer. Drug resistance in patients with cancer represents a significant public health concern, contributing to increased mortality rates resulting from therapy non-responsiveness and disease progression, representing the greatest challenge for researchers in this field. The A>I(G) RNA editing is involved in several mechanisms over the immunotherapy and genotoxic drug response and drug resistance. This review investigates the relationship between ADAR1 and specific A>I(G) RNA-edited sites, focusing particularly on breast cancer, and the impact of these sites on DNA damage repair and the immune response over anti-cancer therapy. We address the underlying mechanisms, bioinformatics, and in vitro strategies for the identification and validation of A>I(G) RNA-edited sites. We gathered databases related to A>I(G) RNA editing and cancer and discussed the potential clinical and research implications of understanding A>I(G) RNA-editing patterns. Understanding the intricate role of ADAR1-mediated A>I(G) RNA editing in breast cancer holds significant promise for the development of personalized treatment approaches tailored to individual patients\' A>I(G) RNA-editing profiles.

Neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) is one of the most common autosomal dominant disorders, since the estimated incidence is one in 3,500 births. In this study, we present bioinformatical and functional characterization of two novel splicing NF1 variants, detected in NF1 patients. Patient 1, carrying NF1:c.122A>T, which introduces a new exonic 5\' donor splice site, was diagnosed with hormone-positive, Her-2-negative breast cancer at the age of 47. She had an atypical presentation of NF1, with few café-au-lait spots and no Lisch nodules. Patient developed a hemothorax due to subclavian artery rupture, which has previously been described as an extremely rare complication of NF1. Patient 2, carrying NF1:c.7395-17T>G that creates a new intronic 3\' acceptor splice site, had quite a typical clinical presentation of NF1: formations on her tongue in the region of her left metacarpal bones and on her left foot, plexiform neurofibroma in her pelvis, several café-au-lait spots, and axillary freckling. She was also diagnosed with cognitive impairment. In the report, we are presenting two novel variants which were successfully classified based on NGS and mRNA analysis. Based on results of mRNA analysis, both variants were classified as likely pathogenic according to ACMG guidelines applying evidence categories PS3, PM2, PP3, and PP1 supporting. By characterizing those two novel NF1 splicing variants, we have confirmed the neurofibromatosis type I phenotype in the two probands.

The CFTR genotype remains incomplete in 1% of Cystic Fibrosis (CF) cases, because only one or no disease-causing variants is detected after extended analysis. This fraction is probably higher in CFTR-Related Disorders (CFTR-RD). Deep-intronic CFTR variants are putative candidates to fill this gap. However, the recurrence, phenotypic spectrum and full molecular characterization of newly reported variants are unknown.
Minigenes and analysis of CFTR transcripts in nasal epithelial cells were used to determine the impact on CFTR splicing of intronic variants that we previously identified by next generation sequencing of the whole CFTR locus. Phenotypic data were collected in 19 patients with CF and CFTR-RD, in whom one of the deep intronic variants has been detected.
Three deep-intronic variants promoted the inclusion of pseudo-exons (PE) in the CFTR transcript, hindering the synthesis of a functional protein. The c.2989-313A > T variant, detected in four patients with CF or CFTR-RD from three different families, led to the inclusion of a 118 bp PE. The c.3469-1304C > G variant promoted the inclusion of a 214 bp-PE and was identified in five patients with CF from four families. Haplotype analysis confirmed that this variant was associated with one CF chromosome of African origin. The most represented variant in our cohort was the c.3874-4522A > G, detected in 10 patients with various phenotypes, from male infertility to CF with pancreatic insufficiency.
These three deep intronic CFTR variants are associated with a large phenotypic spectrum, including typical CF. They should be included in CF diagnostic testing and carrier screening strategies.