splenic injury

脾损伤
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    凝血的矫正是创伤护理的关键方面。虽然有报道强调纤维蛋白原浓缩物在有凝血障碍并发症的严重创伤病例中的有效性,关于其在儿科病例中使用的文献仍然有限.本文讨论了一名5岁男性出现脾损伤和相关凝血病的病例。在使用明胶海绵进行经导管动脉栓塞术之前,我们给予纤维蛋白原浓缩物以增强其凝血能力,旨在实现最佳止血。管理后,患者的纤维蛋白原水平显著改善,导致成功的止血和积极的临床结果。
    Correction of coagulation is a crucial aspect of trauma care. While there are reports highlighting the effectiveness of fibrinogen concentrate in severe trauma cases with coagulopathic complications, literature on its use in pediatric cases remains limited. This paper discusses the case of a 5-year-old male presenting with a splenic injury and associated coagulopathy. We administered fibrinogen concentrate to enhance his coagulability prior to performing transcatheter arterial embolization utilizing gelatin sponges, aiming for optimal hemostasis. Post-administration, the patient\'s fibrinogen levels improved significantly, leading to successful hemostasis and a positive clinical outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们描述了经动脉栓塞术(TAE)治疗的钝性脾损伤患者的临床结果。
    方法:这是一项针对2011年1月至2022年12月期间接受急诊TAE的成年脾损伤患者的回顾性两中心研究。患者分为两组:血液动力学不稳定(HDU)和血液动力学稳定(HDS)患者。HDU患者被定义为液体复苏的瞬时或无应答者,HDS被定义为应答者。当HDU患者无法立即进行剖腹手术时,进行血管造影和栓塞。主要结果是生存出院率。还调查了再出血和脾切除术率。
    结果:在38例因脾外伤而接受急诊TAE的患者中,HDU患者17例,HDS患者21例。HDU患者的生存出院率为88.2%(15/17),HDS患者为100%(p=0.193)。HDU患者的再出血率为23.5%(4/17),HDS患者的再出血率为5.0%(1/21)(p=0.15)。1例HDU患者(5.9%)再出血需要脾切除术。
    结论:TAE治疗HDU患者脾外伤的存活出院率可接受,脾切除术率低。需要对HDU患者进行TAE与手术治疗的进一步比较研究,以证明TAE的有效性。
    OBJECTIVE: We described clinical outcomes for patients with blunt splenic injuries treated with transarterial embolization (TAE) based on their hemodynamic status.
    METHODS: This is a retrospective two-center study of adult patients with splenic injuries who underwent emergency TAE between January 2011 and December 2022. Patients were divided into two groups; hemodynamically unstable (HDU) and hemodynamically stable (HDS) patients. HDU patients were defined as transient- or non-responders to fluid resuscitation and HDS as responders. When immediate laparotomy was not possible for HDU patients, angiography and embolization were performed. The primary outcome was the survival discharge rate. Rebleeding and splenectomy rate was also investigated.
    RESULTS: Of 38 patients underwent emergency TAE for splenic trauma, 17 were HDU patients and 21 were HDS patients. The survival discharge rate was 88.2 % (15/17) in the HDU- and 100 % in HDS patients (p = 0.193). Rebleeding rate was 23.5 % (4/17) in HDU- and 5.0 % (1/21) in HDS patients (p = 0.15). Splenectomy was required for one HDU patient (5.9 %) for rebleeding.
    CONCLUSIONS: The survival discharge rate of TAE for splenic trauma in HDU patients was acceptable with a low rate of splenectomy. Further comparative studies of TAE versus operative management in HDU patients are needed to prove the usefulness of TAE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    腹腔轴狭窄(CAS)是最常见的内脏动脉病变之一。由于肠系膜上动脉的丰富侧支循环,因此很少导致临床上严重的缺血性肠病。有关腹腔动脉狭窄侧支的知识指导各种介入程序。这里,我们描述了一例19岁女性患者,在美国创伤外科协会(AAST)Ⅳ级脾损伤中发现CAS.远端脾动脉栓塞是通过胰十二指肠拱廊的侧支途径进行的。
    Celiac axis stenosis (CAS) is one of the most prevalent splanchnic arterial pathologies. It seldom results in clinically severe ischemic bowel disease because of the rich collateral circulation from the superior mesenteric artery. Knowledge about the collaterals in celiac artery stenosis guides various interventional procedures. Here, we describe a case of a 19-year-old female with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade IV splenic injury found to have CAS. Distal splenic artery embolisation was performed via the collateral pathway through the pancreaticoduodenal arcade.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:近几十年来,脾血管栓塞术(SAE)作为非手术治疗(NOM)的辅助手段,已成为钝性脾损伤(BSI)患者的重要干预措施。SAE改善患者预后,抢救脾脏,并避免与脾切除术相关的并发症。本系统评价旨在评估BSI患者与SAE相关的失败率和并发症。
    方法:系统文献检索(PubMed,Scopus,和Cochrane图书馆)专注于钝性创伤病例中脾血管栓塞的详细研究。包括符合预定纳入标准的文章。这篇综述检查了适应症,结果,故障率,和SAE的并发症。
    结果:在599篇确定的文章中,33符合纳入标准。这些包括29个回顾性研究,三项前瞻性研究,和一项随机对照试验。该分析包括25,521例BSI患者和3,835例SAE患者。SAE的总失败率为5.3%。主要并发症主要为再出血(4.8%),梗塞(4.6%),脓肿形成(4%)。轻微并发症为发热(18.4%),胸腔积液(13.1%),和线圈迁移(3.9%)。其他并发症包括脾萎缩,脾囊肿,血肿,和入路部位并发症,如脾/股骨夹层。总的来说,栓塞后死亡率为0.08%.
    结论:SAE是管理BSI的有价值的辅助手段,故障率低。然而,这种治疗方式并非没有潜在严重并发症的风险.
    BACKGROUND: Over recent decades, splenic angioembolization (SAE) as an adjunct to non-operative management (NOM) has emerged as a prominent intervention for patients with blunt splenic injuries (BSI). SAE improves patient outcomes, salvages the spleen, and averts complications associated with splenectomy. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the failure rate and complications related to SAE in patients with BSI.
    METHODS: A systematic literature search (PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library) focused on studies detailing splenic angioembolization in blunt trauma cases. Articles that fulfilled the predetermined inclusion criteria were included. This review examined the indications, outcomes, failure rate, and complications of SAE.
    RESULTS: Among 599 identified articles, 33 met the inclusion criteria. These comprised 29 retrospective studies, three prospective studies, and one randomized control trial. The analysis encompassed 25,521 patients admitted with BSI and 3,835 patients who underwent SAE. The overall failure rate of SAE was 5.3 %. Major complications predominantly were rebleeding (4.8 %), infarction (4.6 %), and abscess formation (4 %). Minor complications were fever (18.4 %), pleural effusion (13.1 %), and coil migration (3.9 %). Other complications included splenic atrophy, splenic cyst, hematoma, and access site complications such as splenic/femoral dissection. Overall, post embolization mortality was 0.08 %.
    CONCLUSIONS: SAE is a valuable adjunct in managing BSI, with a low failure rate. However, this treatment modality is not without the risk of potentially serious complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    经导管动脉栓塞术(TAE)已越来越多地取代手术治疗实体器官损伤,包括脾脏,由于其微创方法。研究表明,TAE后脾切除术率仅为3%,尽管在美国创伤外科协会(AAST)中,初次计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描时漏诊血管损伤的发生率为10%,但III级脾损伤。然而,缺乏高质量的研究推荐脾损伤非手术治疗(NOM)后特定的CT随访间隔,或在假性动脉瘤或动静脉瘘(AVFs)病例中开始治疗的指南.这里,我们讨论了一名44岁男子因机动车事故而出现脾损伤的案例。脾损伤为AAST-脾脏Ⅲ级,但因为没有血管外漏或AVF形成的证据,选择了NOM。第五天的CT显示假性动脉瘤和AVF,在第七天进行了TAE,保留大部分脾脏实质,无并发症。NOM作为脾损伤治疗策略的适应症正在扩大,但自2018年修订AAST评级以来,等级根据血管损伤的存在或不存在而变化,但在某些情况下,通过CT表现很难确定活动性出血的存在与否.事实上,据报道,超过25%的血管病变没有在CT上出现,尽管CT对检测活动性出血有很好的敏感性,在AAST等级III及以上,NOM故障率较高,所以早期血管造影可能是有用的。脾AVF在早期可能出现很少症状,但在晚期可能出现肝外门静脉高压。患者可能出现腹痛和腹泻等症状。TAE通常是创伤性病例的首选治疗方法,栓塞的程度对维持脾功能和完成治疗之间的平衡很重要。脾外伤的保守治疗可能会增加脾AVF的发生。经导管线圈段分支栓塞术已有效治疗创伤后脾AVF,保留脾免疫功能并降低与手术和脾切除术相关的风险。
    Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) has increasingly replaced surgery for treating solid organ injuries, including the spleen, due to its minimally invasive approach. Studies show only a 3% splenectomy rate after TAE, despite a 10% incidence of missed vascular injuries in the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade III splenic injuries on initial computed tomography (CT) scans. However, there\'s a lack of high-quality studies recommending specific CT follow-up intervals after non-operative management (NOM) of splenic injuries or guidelines for initiating treatment in cases of pseudoaneurysms or arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs). Here, we discuss the case of a 44-year-old man who presented with a splenic injury due to a motor vehicle accident. The splenic injury was AAST-spleen grade III, but because there was no evidence of extravascular leakage or AVF formation, NOM was selected. CT on the fifth day showed a pseudoaneurysm and an AVF, for which TAE was performed on the seventh day, preserving most of the parenchyma of the spleen with no complications. The indications for NOM as a treatment strategy for splenic injury are expanding, but since the 2018 revision of the AAST grading, the grade changes depending on the presence or absence of vascular injury, but in some cases, it is difficult to determine the presence or absence of active bleeding by CT findings. In fact, it has been reported that more than 25% of vascular lesions do not show up on CT, although CT has good sensitivity in detecting active bleeding, and the rate of NOM failure is higher in AAST grade III and above, so early angiography is likely to be useful. Splenic AVF may present with few symptoms in the early stages but may present with extrahepatic portal hypertension in the late stages, and patients may present to the hospital with symptoms such as abdominal pain and diarrhea. TAE is often the treatment of choice in traumatic cases, and the extent of embolization is important in the balance between preserving splenic function and completing treatment. The shift towards conservative management of splenic trauma may increase the occurrence of splenic AVFs. Transcatheter coil embolization of segmental branches has been effective in treating posttraumatic splenic AVFs, preserving splenic immune function and reducing risks linked to surgery and splenectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:已知腰椎侧入路手术有许多潜在的并发症,包括神经血管结构的损伤,周围的内脏,和手术部位附近的腹内结构。然而,在倾向于外侧腰椎间盘切除术和关节固定术后,脾脏的医源性损伤作为潜在的并发症尚未在文献中描述。
    方法:作者介绍了一名71岁的女性,有L3-S1椎板切除术和L3-5关节固定术的病史,该患者接受了L2-3俯卧外侧椎间盘切除术并进行终板关节固定术治疗慢性下腰痛。术后第1天,患者出现低血压,对升压药物无反应,严重的腹痛,和贫血需要2次输血。床边超声显示腹部有游离液体。然后,她接受了脾损伤的剖腹探查术。
    结论:虽然罕见,对于腰椎侧位手术后血流动力学不稳定的患者,应将脾破裂作为鉴别诊断的一部分。任何有低血压证据的病人,贫血,腰椎手术后和/或腹痛应通过腹部计算机断层扫描评估脾损伤,并考虑进行手术干预。https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE23639.
    BACKGROUND: The prone lateral approach to lumbar spine surgery is known to have a multitude of potential complications, including damage to neurovascular structures, surrounding viscera, and intra-abdominal structures near the surgical site. However, iatrogenic injury to the spleen following prone lateral lumbar discectomy and arthrodesis as a potential complication has not yet been described in the literature.
    METHODS: The authors present the case of a 71-year-old female with a history of L3-S1 laminectomy and L3-5 arthrodesis who underwent a prone lateral discectomy of L2-3 with arthrodesis of the endplates for chronic lower-back pain. On postoperative day 1, the patient developed hypotension unresponsive to pressor medications, significant abdominal pain, and anemia requiring 2 transfusions. Bedside ultrasound revealed free fluid in the abdomen. She then underwent an exploratory laparotomy for splenic injury.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, splenic rupture should be considered as part of the differential diagnosis for patients with hemodynamic instability after lateral surgical approaches to the lumbar spine. Any patient with evidence of hypotension, anemia, and/or abdominal pain following lumbar surgery should be evaluated for splenic injury with an abdominal computed tomography scan and considered for surgical intervention. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE23639.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在过去十年中,脾损伤的非手术治疗显着增加,并且越来越重视脾保存。血管栓塞的可用性增加有助于这种转变,然而,新西兰奥特亚罗阿(AoNZ)存在准入的潜在地理差异。这项研究的目的是评估整个AoNZ的脾损伤的管理。
    方法:对AoNZ医院收治的所有钝性严重创伤和脾损伤患者进行了为期五年的回顾性研究。使用国家创伤登记处对患者进行鉴定,并与国家最低数据集进行交叉引用以确定其管理。主要结果是非手术率。
    结果:纳入773例患者。四百六十九人被送到三级主要创伤医院,304人被送到二级主要创伤医院。三级医院和二级医院的非手术治疗率存在差异(P=0.019)。轻度(P=0.814)和中度(P=0.825)损伤的非手术治疗率相似,然而,三级医院的严重伤害明显更高(P=0.009)。死亡率没有差异。
    结论:本研究发现三级和二级主要创伤医院在脾损伤处理方面存在差异;主要是由于二级医院严重损伤患者的手术处理率较高。尽管如此,三级医院和二级医院的死亡率没有差异.
    BACKGROUND: Non-operative management of splenic injuries has significantly increased in the last decade with an increased emphasis on splenic preservation. This shift was assisted by increased availability of angioembolization, however, potential geographical variability in access exists in Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ). The aim of this study was to assess the management of splenic injury across AoNZ.
    METHODS: Five-year retrospective study of all patients admitted to AoNZ hospitals with blunt major trauma and a splenic injury. Patients were identified using the National Trauma Registry and cross-referenced with the National Minimum Data Set to determine their management. The primary outcome was the non-operative rate.
    RESULTS: Seven hundred seventy-three patients were included. Four hundred sixty-nine presented to a tertiary major trauma hospital and 304 to a secondary major trauma hospital. A difference was found in the rate of non-operative management between tertiary and secondary hospitals (P = 0.019). The rate of non-operative management was similar in mild (P = 0.814) and moderate (P = 0.825) injuries, however, significantly higher in severe injuries in tertiary hospitals (P = 0.009). No difference in mortality rate was found.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study found a difference in the management of splenic injuries between tertiary and secondary major trauma hospitals; predominantly due to a higher rate of operative management in patients with severe injuries at secondary hospitals. Despite this, no difference in mortality rate was found between tertiary and secondary hospitals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本系统综述的目的是通过随访计算机断层扫描(CT)评估成人非手术治疗(NOM)脾损伤的假性动脉瘤(PSA)的估计发生率。
    方法:在MEDLINE进行了系统的文献检索,中央,CINAHL,临床试验,2010年1月1日至2023年12月31日之间的ICTRP数据库。使用非随机暴露研究中的偏倚风险(ROBINS-E)工具进行质量评估。包括最初接受NOM治疗并接受原型CT随访的成人脾损伤患者。主要结果是延迟PSA的发生率。次要结果指标是延迟的血管造影和延迟的脾切除术。在无初始脾血管栓塞(SAE)的NOM患者和有初始SAE的NOM患者之间进行了亚组分析。
    结果:纳入了12项研究,包括11项回顾性研究和一项前瞻性研究,共有1746名患者。纳入患者的随访CT率为94.9%。PSA的估计发生率为14%(95%置信区间(CI),8%-21%)。估计延迟血管造影和延迟脾切除的发生率分别为7%(95%CI,4%-12%)和2%(95%CI,1%-6%),分别。亚组分析显示,在没有初始SAE的NOM患者中,PSA的估计发生率为12%(95%CI,7%-20%),在有SAE的NOM患者中也为12%(95%CI,5%-24%)。
    结论:成人NOM脾损伤随访CT后延迟PSA的估计发生率为14%。在具有初始SAE的NOM中,PSA的估计发生率与没有初始SAE的NOM相似。
    BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to assess the estimated incidence of pseudoaneurysm (PSA) with follow-up computed tomography (CT) for adult splenic injury with nonoperative management (NOM).
    METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Central, CINAHL, Clinical Trials, and ICTRP databases between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2023. Quality assessment was performed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Exposures (ROBINS-E) tool. Adult splenic injury patients who were initially managed with NOM and followed-up by protocolized CT were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of delayed PSA. Secondary outcome measures were delayed angiography and delayed splenectomy. Subgroup analyses were performed between NOM patients without initial splenic angioembolization (SAE) and NOM patients with initial SAE.
    RESULTS: Twelve studies were enrolled, including 11 retrospective studies and one prospective study, with 1746 patients in total. The follow-up CT rate in the included patients was 94.9%. The estimated incidence of PSA was 14% (95% confidence interval (CI), 8%-21%). The estimated delayed angiography and delayed splenectomy incidence rates were 7% (95% CI, 4%-12%) and 2% (95% CI, 1%-6%), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that the estimated PSA incidence was 12% in NOM patients without initial SAE (95% CI, 7%-20%) and was also 12% in NOM patients with SAE (95% CI, 5%-24%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The estimated incidence of delayed PSA after follow-up CT for adult splenic injury with NOM was 14%. The estimated incidence of PSA in NOM with initial SAE was similar to that in NOM without initial SAE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)仍然是创伤发病的主要原因。目前尚不清楚出血控制程序的类型(即,脾切除术与血管栓塞术)与VTE风险增加相关。我们假设,与接受脾切除术的患者相比,接受血管栓塞治疗钝性高级别脾损伤的血流动力学稳定的患者的VTE发生率较低。
    方法:查询了2017年至2019年美国外科医生学会创伤质量计划数据集,以确定美国3-5级钝性脾损伤手术协会的所有患者。比较了接受脾切除术和血管栓塞治疗的患者的结果,包括VTE率。倾向评分匹配(1:1)进行年龄调整,性别,初始生命体征,伤害严重程度评分,和脾损伤等级。
    结果:分析包括4698例匹配患者(脾切除术[n=2349]和血管栓塞[n=2349])。中位(四分位间距)年龄为41(27-58)岁,69%为男性。患者之间匹配良好。血管栓塞与VTE显著低于脾切除术(2.2%对3.4%,P=0.010),尽管使用了较少的VTE化学预防(70%对80%,P<0.001),以及开始化学预防的相对延迟(44h对33h,P<0.001)。血管栓塞组的住院时间和重症监护病房住院时间和死亡率也明显较低。
    结论:血管栓塞术与VTE的发生率明显低于脾切除术。因此,对于高度钝性脾损伤的血流动力学稳定的患者,初始治疗应考虑血管栓塞治疗,其中不需要进行剖腹手术.
    BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) continues to be a major cause of morbidity in trauma. It is unclear whether the type of hemorrhage control procedure (i.e., splenectomy versus angioembolization) is associated with an increased risk of VTE. We hypothesize that hemodynamically stable patients undergoing angioembolization for blunt high-grade splenic injuries have lower rates of VTE compared to those undergoing splenectomy.
    METHODS: The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Program dataset from 2017 to 2019 was queried to identify all patients with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade 3-5 blunt splenic injuries. Outcomes including VTE rates were compared between those who were managed with splenectomy versus angioembolization. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed adjusting for age, sex, initial vital signs, Injury Severity Score, and splenic injury grade.
    RESULTS: The analysis included 4698 matched patients (splenectomy [n = 2349] and angioembolization [n = 2349]). The median (interquartile range) age was 41 (27-58) years and 69% were male. Patients were well matched between groups. Angioembolization was associated with significantly lower VTE than splenectomy (2.2% versus 3.4%, P = 0.010) despite less use of VTE chemoprophylaxis (70% versus 80%, P < 0.001), as well as a relative delay in initiation of chemoprophylaxis (44 h versus 33 h, P < 0.001). Hospital and intensive care unit length of stay and mortality were also significantly lower in the angioembolization group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Angioembolization is associated with a significantly lower incidence of VTE than splenectomy. Thus, angioembolization should be considered for initial management of hemodynamically stable patients with high-grade blunt splenic injuries in whom laparotomy is not otherwise indicated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究的目的是确定与使用保脾手术相关的因素,以及患者的结果,在全国范围内。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究(2010-2015年)纳入了国家创伤数据库中的脾损伤患者(年龄≥16岁)。比较接受全脾切除术或保脾手术的患者的人口统计学和临床结果。
    结果:在研究期间,18,425例接受了全脾切除术,1,825例接受了保脾手术。年龄>65岁的患者更有可能进行全脾切除术(比值比[OR]:0.63,p<0.001),收缩压<90(OR:0.63,p<0.001),心率>120(OR:0.83,p=0.007),和高级别伤害(OR:0.18,p<0.001)。穿透性创伤患者更有可能接受保脾手术(OR:3.31,p<0.001)。使用保脾手术与较低的肺炎风险(OR:0.79,p=0.009)和静脉血栓栓塞(OR:0.72,p=0.006)相关。
    结论:穿透性创伤患者可以考虑保脾手术,年龄<65岁,血流动力学稳定性,和低级伤害。保脾手术可降低肺炎和静脉血栓栓塞的风险。
    BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with the use of spleen-conserving surgeries, as well as patient outcomes, on a national scale.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study (2010-2015) included patients (age≥16 years) with splenic injury in the National Trauma Data Bank. Patients who received a total splenectomy or a spleen-conserving surgery were compared for demographics and clinical outcomes.
    RESULTS: During the study period, 18,425 received a total splenectomy and 1,825 received a spleen-conserving surgery. Total splenectomy was more likely to be performed for patients with age>65 (odds ratio [OR]: 0.63, p ​< ​0.001), systolic blood pressure<90 (OR: 0.63, p ​< ​0.001), heart rate>120 (OR: 0.83, p ​= ​0.007), and high-grade injuries (OR: 0.18, p ​< ​0.001). Penetrating trauma patients were more likely to undergo a spleen-conserving surgery (OR: 3.31, p ​< ​0.001). The use of spleen-conserving surgery was associated with a lower risk of pneumonia (OR: 0.79, p ​= ​0.009) and venous thromboembolism (OR: 0.72, p ​= ​0.006).
    CONCLUSIONS: Spleen-conserving surgeries may be considered for patients with penetrating trauma, age<65, hemodynamic stability, and low-grade injuries. Spleen-conserving surgeries have decreased risk of pneumonia and venous thromboembolism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号