spine degenerative diseases

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    方法:制定指南的方法学研究。
    目的:AO脊柱退行性病变使用骨生物学指南(AO-GO)项目是一项国际性的,多学科协作倡议,以确定和评估在颈椎前路融合减压术(ACDF)中使用骨生物制剂的现有证据。目的是制定精确的定义,临床相关和国际适用的指南,确保以证据为基础,安全有效地使用骨生物制剂,考虑区域偏好和成本效益。
    方法:指南分两个阶段完成:第1阶段证据综合;第2阶段基于建议分级的建议开发,评估,开发和评估(等级)方法。在第一阶段,专家小组确定的关键问题在一系列随机和非随机研究的系统评价中得到了解决。在第二阶段中,使用了GRADE方法来制定一系列建议,包括通过网络通话和面对面会议进行专家小组讨论。
    结论:AO-GO旨在弥合骨生物制剂在脊柱融合手术中的证据和使用之间的重要差距。由于骨生物制剂的制备和功能特性的差异,批准的监管要求可能会有所不同,因此,这些产品很有可能在没有高质量临床试验的情况下进入市场。通过整体方法,该指南旨在促进基于证据的,临床实践中面向患者的决策过程,因此刺激了关于骨生物学在脊柱手术中使用的进一步循证研究。在第3阶段,该指南将在AO脊柱知识论坛的一项全球多中心临床研究中使用前瞻性收集的临床数据进行传播和验证。
    METHODS: Methodological study for guideline development.
    OBJECTIVE: AO Spine Guideline for Using Osteobiologics (AO-GO) project for spine degenerative pathologies was an international, multidisciplinary collaborative initiative to identify and evaluate evidence on existing use of osteobiologics in Anterior Cervical Fusion and Decompression (ACDF). The aim was to formulate precisely defined, clinically relevant and internationally applicable guidelines ensuring evidence-based, safe and effective use of osteobiologics, considering regional preferences and cost-effectiveness.
    METHODS: Guideline was completed in two phases: Phase 1- evidence synthesis; Phase 2- recommendation development based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. In Phase 1, key questions identified by a panel of experts were addressed in a series of systematic reviews of randomized and non-randomized studies. In Phase 2, the GRADE approach was used to formulate a series of recommendations, including expert panel discussions via web calls and face-to-face meetings.
    CONCLUSIONS: AO-GO aims to bridge an important gap between evidence and use of osteobiologics in spine fusion surgeries. Owing to differences in osteobiologics preparation and functional characteristics, regulatory requirements for approval may vary, therefore it is highly likely that these products enter market without quality clinical trials. With a holistic approach the guideline aims to facilitate evidence-based, patient-oriented decision-making processes in clinical practice, thus stimulating further evidence-based studies regarding osteobiologics usage in spine surgeries. In Phase 3, the guideline will be disseminated and validated using prospectively collected clinical data in a separate effort of the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative in a global multicenter clinical study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:下腰痛(LBP)是一种新出现的疾病。本综述旨在探讨性别相关因素在诊断中的作用。临床,和LBP的外科治疗。
    方法:从2002年1月到2023年3月,EMBASE,Scopus,OVID-MEDLINE,谷歌学者,PubMed,和WebofScience进行了搜索,以确定相关论文进行进一步分析。
    结果:这篇综述包括15篇论文。对性别和性别相关的差异进行了分析:(1)LBP流行病学;(2)LBP病理生理学;(3)LBP的保守治疗;(4)LBP的主要椎体手术。LBP的保守治疗突显了女性比男性更晚的健康状况。在术后阶段,女性患者表现出更差的LBP,生活质量,残疾,但相等或更大的间隔变化,与抱怨腰椎退行性疾病的男性患者相比。
    结论:LBP流行病学和临床结果,在对抱怨背痛的患者进行保守和手术治疗后,可能取决于性别和性别相关因素。必须评估LBP患者的性别相关指标,并解决这些指标以改善其临床结局和生活质量。
    BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is an emerging disease. This review aims to investigate the role of gender-related factors in the diagnosis, clinical, and surgical management of LBP.
    METHODS: From January 2002 to March 2023, EMBASE, SCOPUS, OVID-MEDLINE, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched to identify relevant papers for further analysis.
    RESULTS: Fifteen papers were included in this review. Sex- and gender-related differences were analyzed regarding the following points: (1) LBP epidemiology; (2) LBP physiopathology; (3) conservative management of LBP; (4) major vertebral surgery for LBP. The conservative treatment of LBP highlights that women claim services later in terms of poorer health status than men. In the postoperative phase, female patients show worse LBP, quality of life, and disability, but equal or greater interval change, compared with male patients complaining of lumbar degenerative disease.
    CONCLUSIONS: LBP epidemiology and clinical outcomes, following conservative and surgical management of patients complaining of back pain, might depend on both sex- and gender-related factors. It is mandatory to assess gender-related indicators in patients referred to LBP and address them to improve their clinical outcomes and quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Sciatica is a common symptom for many people with degenerative lumbar spine diseases. It is by far the most common symptom of disc herniation. However, disc herniation is not the only cause of sciatica. Other degenerative lumbar spine diseases can provoke Sciatica. To date, few studies have analysed the cause of sciatica in particularly in elderly patients.
    UNASSIGNED: We analysed retrospectively records of patients aged between 35 and 55 (first group) and between 65 and 85 (second group) visited in our departments for sciatica between December 2009 and November 2018.
    UNASSIGNED: In elderly patients, disc herniation from upper levels (L2-L3 and L3-L4) is more common than younger people. Sciatica as a result of exclusive disc herniation reduces with age. Foramen stenosis produces sciatica in elderly patients more than twice as high in younger patients. Statistically, more patients needed to surgery in elderly patients in comparison with younger population.
    UNASSIGNED: Sciatica in elderly patients takes a different clinical aspect in comparison with younger population. The clinical picture associates pain less severe but more persistent, more resistant to treatment. It is caused in less than 50% by disc herniation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号