UNASSIGNED: Osteolytic spinal metastases (SM) have a higher risk of fracture. In this study we aim to confirm the remineralization of lytic SM after radiation therapy. Secondary the influence of SBRT compared to cEBRT and tumor type will be analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective cohort study was performed.
UNASSIGNED: 87 patients, 100 SM were included. 29 received SBRT, 71 cEBRT. Most common primary tumors were breast (35 %), lung (26 %) and renal (11 %). Both cEBRT and SBRT resulted in a significant increase of bone mineral density (BMD) (83.76 HU ± 5.72 → 241.41 HU ± 22.58 (p < 0.001) and 82.45 ± 9.13 → 179.38 ± 47.83p = 0.026). There was a significant increase in absolute difference of BMD between the SM and reference vertebrae (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between SBRT and cEBRT. There was no increase of BMD in renal lytic SM after radiation therapy (pre-treatment: 85.96 HU ± 19.07; 3 m 92.00 HU ± 21.86 (p = 0.882); 6 m 92.06 HU ± 23.94 (p = 0.902); 9 m 70.44 HU ± 7.45 (p = 0.213); 12 m 98.08 HU ± 11.24 (p = 0.740)). In all other primary tumors, a significant increase of BMD after radiation therapy was demonstrated (p < 0,05).
UNASSIGNED: We conclude that the BMD of lytic SM increases significantly after radiation therapy. Lytic SM of primary renal tumors are the exception; there is no significant remineralization of renal lytic SM after radiation therapy. There is no benefit of SBRT over cEBRT in this remineralization. These findings should be taken into account when deciding on surgery in the potentially unstable group defined by the spinal instability neoplastic score.

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive intermediate bone tumor. Denosumab has shown effectiveness in GCTB treatment; however, the benefits of denosumab de-escalation for unresectable GCTB have not been well discussed. The present study investigated the efficacy and safety of denosumab de-escalation for GCTB. The medical records of 9 patients with unresectable GCTB or resectable GCTB not eligible for resection, who received de-escalated denosumab treatment at Okayama University Hospital (Okayama, Japan) between April 2014 and December 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. The denosumab treatment interval was gradually extended to every 8, 12 and 24 weeks. The radiographic changes and clinical symptoms during standard and de-escalated denosumab therapy were assessed. The denosumab interval was de-escalated after a median of 12 months of a standard 4-weekly treatment. Imaging showed that the re-ossification of osteolytic lesions obtained with the 4-weekly treatment were sustained with 8- and 12-weekly treatments. The extraskeletal masses reduced significantly with standard treatment, while tumor reduction was sustained during de-escalated treatment. During the 24-weekly treatment, 2 patients remained stable, while 2 patients developed local recurrence. The clinical symptoms improved significantly with standard treatment and remained improved during de-escalated treatment. There were severe adverse events including osteonecrosis of the jaw (2 patients), atypical femoral fracture (1 patient) and malignant transformation of GCTB (1 patient). In conclusion, 12-weekly de-escalated denosumab treatment showed clinical benefits as a maintenance treatment in patients with unresectable GCTB, in addition to sustained stable tumor control and improved clinical symptoms with standard treatment. A 24-weekly treatment can also be administered, with careful attention paid to detecting local recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the results of primary stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal bone metastases (SBM) originating from lung adenocarcinoma (ADC). We considered the revised Tokuhashi score (rTS), Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), and genetic characteristics.
METHODS: We examined adult patients with lung ADC who underwent primary SBRT (using the CyberKnife System) for SBM between March 2012 and January 2023.
RESULTS: We analyzed data from 99 patients, covering 152 SBM across 194 vertebrae. The overall local control (LC) rate was 77.6% for SBM from lung ADC, with a LC rate of 90.7% at 1 year. The median period for local progression (LP) occurrence was recorded at 10.0 (3-52) months. Additionally, Asian patients demonstrated higher LC rates than White patients. Utilizing the rTS and SINS as predictive tools, we revealed that a poor survival prognosis and an unstable spinal structure were associated with increased rates of LP. Furthermore, the presence of osteolytic bone destructions and pain complaints were significantly correlated with the occurrence of LP. In the cohort of this study, 108 SBM underwent analysis to determine the expression levels of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Additionally, within this group, 60 showed mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alongside PD-L1 expression. Nevertheless, these genetic differences did not result in statistically significant differences in the LC rate.
CONCLUSIONS: The one-year LC rate for primary SBRT targeting SBM from lung ADC stood at 90.7%, particularly with the use of the CyberKnife System. Patients achieving LC exhibited significantly longer survival times compared to those with LP.

OBJECTIVE: Precise assessment of spinal instability is critical before and after radiotherapy (RT) for evaluating the effectiveness of RT. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of RT in spinal instability over a period of 6 months after RT, utilizing the spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) in patients with painful spinal metastasis. We retrospectively evaluated 108 patients who received RT for painful vertebral metastasis in our institution. Mechanical pain at metastatic vertebrae, radiological responses of irradiated vertebrae, and spinal instability were assessed. Follow-up assessments were done at the start of and at intervals of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 months after RT, with the pain disappearing in 67%, 85%, 93%, 97%, and 100% of the patients, respectively. The median SINS were 8, 6, 6, 5, 5, and 4 at the beginning and after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 months of RT, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that posterolateral involvement of spinal elements (PLISE) was the only risk factor for continuous potentially unstable/unstable spine at 1 month. In conclusion, there was improvement of pain, and recalcification results in regaining spinal stability over time after RT although vertebral body collapse and malalignment occur in some irradiated vertebrae. Clinicians should pay attention to PLISE in predicting continuous potentially unstable/unstable spine.

METHODS: Retrospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: To build a predictive model for risk factors for failure of radiation therapy, hypothesizing a higher SINS would correlate with failure.
METHODS: Patients with spinal metastasis being treated with radiation at a tertiary care academic center between September 2014 and October 2018 were identified. The primary outcome measure was radiation therapy failure as defined by persistent pain, need for re-irradiation, or surgical intervention. Risk factors were primary tumor type, Karnofsky and ECOG scores, time to treatment, biologically effective dose (BED) calculations using α/β ratio = 10, and radiation modality. A logistic regression was used to construct a prediction model for radiation therapy failure.
RESULTS: One hundred and seventy patients were included. Median follow up was 91.5 days. Forty-three patients failed radiation therapy. Of those patients, 10 required repeat radiation and 7 underwent surgery. Thirty-six patients reported no pain relief, including some that required re-irradiation and surgery. Total SINS score for those who failed reduction therapy was <7 for 27 patients (62.8%), between 7-12 for 14 patients (32.6%), and >12 for 2 patients (4.6%). In the final prediction model, BED (OR .451 for BED > 43 compared to BED ≤ 43; P = .174), Karnofksy score (OR .736 for every 10 unit increase in Karnofksy score; P = .008), and gender (OR 2.147 for male compared to female; P = .053) are associated with risk of radiation failure (AUC .695). A statistically significant association between SINS score and radiation therapy failure was not found.
CONCLUSIONS: In the multivariable model, BED ≤ 43, lower Karnofksy score, and male gender are predictive for radiotherapy failure. SINS score was among the candidate risk factors included in multivariable model building procedure, but it was not selected in the final model.
UNASSIGNED: Prognostic level III.

BACKGROUND: Little is known on how denosumab reduces skeletal-related events (SREs) by bone metastases from solid tumors. We sought to evaluate the effect of denosumab administration in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors.
METHODS: Data of patients treated with denosumab were collected from electronic medical charts (n = 496). Eligible participants in this study were adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with metastatic bone lesions from solid tumors treated with denosumab. SREs, surgical interventions, the spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) for spinal region, and Mirels\' score for the appendicular region were evaluated. To assess whether denosumab could prevent SREs and associated surgery, the SINS and Mirels\' score were compared between patients with and without SREs.
RESULTS: A total of 247 patients (median age, 65.5 years old; median follow-up period, 13 months) treated with denosumab for metastatic bone lesions from solid tumors were enrolled in this study. SREs occurred in 19 patients (7.7%). SREs occurred in 2 patients (0.8%) who took denosumab administration before SREs. Surgical interventions were undertaken in 14 patients (5.7%) (spinal and intradural lesions in five patients and appendicular lesions in nine patients). The mean SINS of patients without SREs compared to those with SREs were 7.5 points and 10.2 points, respectively. The mean Mirels\' scores of non-SREs patients and those with SREs were 8.07 points and 10.7 points, respectively. Patients with SREs had significantly higher Mirels\' score than non-SREs patients (p < 0.01). Patients with SREs had higher SINS than non-SREs patients (p = 0.09).
CONCLUSIONS: SREs occurred in patients with higher SINS or Mirels\' scores. Two patients suffered from SREs though they took denosumab administration before SREs. Appropriate management of denosumab for patients with bone metastasis is significant. Surgical interventions may be needed for patients who with higher SINS or Mirel\'s scores.

Conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT) is used in multiple myeloma (MM) to treat severe pain, spinal cord compression, and disease-related bone disease. However, radiation may be associated with an increased risk of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs), which could substantially impair survival and quality of life. Additionally, the use of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) in MM is debated in MM.
To determine the incidence of VCFs after cEBRT in patients with MM and to assess the applicability of the SINS score in the prediction of VCFs in MM.
Retrospective multicenter cohort study.
MM patients with spinal myeloma lesions who underwent cEBRT between January 2010 and December 2021.
Frequency of new or progressed VCFs and subdistribution hazard ratios for potentially associated factors.
Patient and treatment characteristics were manually collected from the patients\' electronic medical records. Computed tomography (CT) scans from before and up to 3 years after the start of radiation were used to score radiographic variables at baseline and at follow-up. Multivariable Fine and Gray competing risk analyses were performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the SINS score to predict the postradiation VCF rate.
A total of 127 patients with 427 eligible radiated vertebrae were included in this study. The mean age at radiation was 64 years, and 66.1% of them were male. At the start of radiation, 57 patients (44.9%) had at least one VCF. There were 89 preexisting VCFs (18.4% of 483 vertebrae). Overall, 39 of 127 patients (30.7%) reported new fractures (number of vertebrae (n)=12) or showed progression of existing fractures (n=36). This number represented 11.2% of all radiated vertebrae. Five of the 39 (12.8%) patients with new or worsened VCFs received an unplanned secondary treatment (augmentation [n=2] or open surgery [n=3]) within 3 years. Both the total SINS score (SHR 1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.54-2.03; p<.001) and categorical SINS score (SHR 10.83; 95% CI 4.20-27.94; p<.001) showed an independent association with higher rates of new or progressed VCFs in adjusted analyses. The use of bisphosphonates was independently associated with a lower rate of new or progressed VCFs (SHR 0.47 [95% CI 0.24-0.92; p=.027]).
This study demonstrated that new or progressed VCFs occurred in 30.7% of patients within 3 years, in a total of 11.2% of vertebrae. The SINS score was found to be independently associated with the development or progression of VCFs and could thus be applied in MM for fracture prediction and possibly prevention.

OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate an interdisciplinary consultation followed by a precision-based exercise program (PEP) for myeloma patients with stable and unstable bone lesions.
METHODS: Data of myeloma patients (n = 100) who received a PEP according to an orthopedic evaluation were analyzed. Bone stability was assessed by established scoring systems (Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score [SINS], Mirels\' score). All patients with stable and unstable osteolyses received a PEP and n = 91 were contacted for a follow-up interview.
RESULTS: In 60% of patients at least one osteolysis of the spine was considered potentially unstable or unstable. Following consultation, the number of patients performing resistance training could be significantly increased (≥2 sessions/week, 55%). Musculoskeletal pain was reported frequently. At the follow-up interview, 75% of patients who performed PEP stated that painful symptoms could be effectively alleviated by exercise. Moreover, only patients who exercised regularly discontinued pain medication. No injuries were reported in association with PEP.
CONCLUSIONS: We were able to demonstrate that individualized resistance training is implementable and safe for myeloma patients. By means of a PEP, patients\' self-efficacy in managing musculoskeletal pain was enhanced and pain medication could be reduced.

Radiologists play a primary role in identifying, characterizing, and classifying spinal metastases and can play a lifesaving role in the care of these patients by triaging those with instability to urgent spine surgery consultation. For this reason, an understanding of current treatment algorithms and principles of spinal stability in patients with cancer is vital for all who interpret spine studies. In addition, advances in imaging allow radiologists to provide more accurate diagnoses and characterize pathology, thereby improving patient safety.

UNASSIGNED: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is popularly used to treat bone metastasis. Despite its efficacy, adverse events, including vertebral compression fracture (VCF), are frequently observed. Here, we investigated VCF risk after SABR for oligometastatic vertebral bone metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 84 patients with 144 metastatic bone lesions treated at three institutions between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoint was VCF development, either new or progression of a pre-existing VCF. VCFs were assessed using the spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS).
UNASSIGNED: Among 144 spinal segments, 26 (18%) had pre-existing VCF and 90 (63%) had soft tissue extension. The median biologically effective dose (BED) was 76.8 Gy. VCF developed in 14 (12%) of 118 VCF-naïve patients and progressed in 20 of the 26 with pre-existing VCF. The median time to VCF development was 6 months (range, 1-12 months). The cumulative incidence of VCF at 12 months with SINS class I, II and III was 0%, 26% and 83%, respectively (p < 0.001). Significant factors for VCF development were pre-existing VCF, soft tissue extension, high BED, and SINS class in univariate analysis, and pre-existing VCF in multivariate analysis. Of the six components of SINS, pain, type of bone lesion, spine alignment, vertebral body collapse, and posterolateral involvement were identified as predictors of VCF development.
UNASSIGNED: SABR for oligometastatic vertebral bone lesions from HCC resulted in a substantial rate of new VCF development and pre-existing VCF progression. Pre-existing VCF was significant risk factor for VCF development, which require special attention in patient care. Patients with SINS class III should be considered surgical treatment rather than upfront SABR.