The frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique can be applied to extensive aortic pathology, including lesions in the aortic arch and proximal descending thoracic aorta. FET is useful for tear-oriented surgery in dissections, managing malperfusion syndrome, and promoting positive aortic remodeling. Despite these benefits, complications such as distal stent-induced new entry and spinal cord ischemia can pose serious problems with the FET technique. To prevent these complications, careful sizing and planning of the FET are crucial. Additionally, since the FET technique involves total arch replacement, meticulous surgical skills are essential, particularly for young surgeons. In this article, we propose several techniques to simplify surgical procedures, which may lead to better outcomes for patients with extensive aortic pathology. In the era of precision medicine, the next-generation FET device could facilitate the treatment of complex aortic diseases through a patient-tailored approach.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a devastating complication that is associated with thoracoabdominal aortic repair, with higher risk associated with increased aortic coverage length, making patients undergoing branched/fenestrated endovascular repair(B/FEVAR) particularly vulnerable. A bundled SCI prevention protocol was previously reported to reduce SCI rates when compared to a historic cohort in a single-center study. Therefore, this analysis aims to further validate and update outcomes associated with the protocol given the routine implementation of this strategy at two institutions (University of Florida [UF] and the University of Alabama at Birmingham [UAB]) since inception.
METHODS: Components of the SCI prevention protocol include selective cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage, specified blood pressure parameters, transfusion goals, and selective pharmacologic adjuncts (naloxone, steroids). This protocol was routinely implemented in May 2015. Patients undergoing B/FEVAR from May 2015-December 2022 constituted the post-protocol cohort(n=402) and were compared to the pre-protocol cohort (n=160, January 2010-April 2015). The primary outcome was SCI incidence and subgroup analysis was conducted among patients deemed to be high-risk (Crawford extent I- III thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAA) dissection-related disease, prior aortic repair, coverage proximal to zone 5). Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
RESULTS: The pre- and post-protocol cohorts were demographically similar, though more post-protocol patients were American Society of Anesthesiology(ASA) class IV (86.1% vs. 55.0%; p<0.001). TAAA was the most common indication in both groups. CSF drain placement was more common in the post-protocol group, particularly among high-risk patients. SCI occurred in 15.9% of pre-protocol patients versus 3.0% of post-protocol patients(p<0.001). In high-risk patients, the pre- and post-protocol cohort SCI incidence was 23.2% vs. 5.0%, respectively (p<0.001). 30-day mortality was decreased in the post-protocol cohort (6.3% vs. 2.2%, p=0.02). Although the post-protocol group had a trend toward improved 1-year survival, this was not statistically significant (84.4% vs. 88.3%, log-rank p=0.35). Among SCI patients, one-year mortality was 28% and 33.3% in the pre- and post-protocol groups, respectively(p=0.46).
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a bundled SCI prevention protocol significantly reduces SCI rates in B/FEVAR patients, which has now been validated at two institutions, with the most significant reductions occurring among high-risk patients. Although the overall one-year mortality difference was not significantly different between the cohorts, the high mortality rates among SCI patients highlights the importance of preventative measures.

UNASSIGNED: To analyze the incidence of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after complex endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) after the introduction of a dedicated SCI preventive protocol.
UNASSIGNED: Retrospective review of all consecutive patients undergoing complex EVAR with branched (BEVAR) and/or fenestrated grafts (FEVAR) during a 6-year period starting January 1st, 2015. The preventive protocol consisted of staging extensive aortic repairs, maintaining a mean arterial pressure (MAP) >80 mm Hg, Hb level >110 g/L, early lower limb reperfusion and neurological control per hour during the post-operative stay in the intensive care unit (36-72 h). Prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) was used selectively. Pre- intra-, and 30-day postoperative clinical data and imaging were collected. Primary end point was the development of perioperative SCI. Secondary outcome included technical and clinical success.
UNASSIGNED: Complex EVAR was performed in 205 patients (167 males, 72 (67-75) years, 182 (88.8%) elective) with juxtarenal aneurysms (JRA, 155 patients) or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA). SCI occurred after JRA repair in two patients (1.3%, both ruptures) and after TAAA repair in three (6.0%, one rupture) (p = 0.06), all within 9 h postoperatively. There was symptom regression in three cases (one partial, two complete), resulting in a persistent SCI level of 0.6% and 4.0% for JRA and TAAA, respectively. Only one patient with persistent SCI could be discharged from the hospital alive. Patients developing SCI were more commonly female (n = 3, p = .016), presented with rupture (n = 3, p < .001), had preoperative renal insufficiency (n = 5, p < .001) and had lower minimal MAP (p = .015). No regression analysis was done due to the limited number of SCI events in relation to the study population size. Primary technical success was achieved in 162 patients (83.5%) and clinical success in 153 patients (75.4%), without any differences between the groups.
UNASSIGNED: The incidence of persistent SCI after complex EVAR is low with the use of a dedicated SCI preventive protocol allowing the early diagnosis. Females, patients with ruptured aneurysms and preoperative renal insufficiency are at higher risk. Further studies are needed to customize the protocols particularly in those high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord infarction is an uncommon nervous system disorder. We present a case of high cervical cord infarction caused by stenting of the origin of the left vertebral artery (VA). The incidence of spinal cord infarction is minimal, and it must be distinguished from a number of other disorders. The diagnosis is primarily based on imaging, clinical symptoms, and history. Currently, there is no focused treatment for spinal cord infarction. Thrombolysis, high-dose glucocorticoid shocks, tube dilatation to promote circulation, and nutritional neurotropic medicines given early in the course of the disease can all help to slow the disease\'s progression. There is no agreement on the etiology, diagnosis, or therapy options for these people.
METHODS: On October 7, 2023, an 81-year-old man was admitted to the hospital primarily for recurrent chest tightness and pain that had persisted for more than 2 years and 1 month. Cerebral angiography upon admission revealed significant blockage of the right VA and stenosis of the left vertebral arterial origin. Six days following admission, a drug-eluting stenting procedure was carried out under local anesthesia to open the left VA origin via the femoral artery. Following the procedure, the patient experienced a progressive loss of muscle strength in all 4 limbs and paraplegia below the cervical 3 spinal cord. One week following the procedure, the patient was released from the hospital. After the procedure, the patient was released 1 week later. After the procedure, the patient\'s symptoms persisted for a month.
CONCLUSIONS: High awareness for high cervical cord infarction is required when neck discomfort and limb weakness with progressive progression arises after surgery. Complications of high cervical cord infarction following stenting for stenosis of VA origin are uncommon in clinical settings. Patients\' prognoses can be improved by prompt diagnosis and care.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of the article is to outline the frequency of the occurrence, course, diagnosis and possible treatment of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) on the basis of a literature overview and to raise awareness of this rare yet devastating condition.
UNASSIGNED: SCI, when compared to cerebral stroke, is a relatively rare disease, being diagnosed 100 times less often. Our knowledge as to its root causes, proper treatment for it and long-term prognosis is still inconclusive. Magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion- weighted contrast is a main tool with which to confirm SCI and rule out a broad spectrum of possible alternative diagnoses. SCI is a condition in which prompt recognition, accurate diagnostic steps, and reperfusion therapy are essential to ensure a desirable functional outcome and reduce mortality and disability. Although there are no specific guidelines regarding treatment, the administration of rt-PA might be an effective therapy for acute ischemic stroke, preventing permanent spinal dysfunction. In surgical causes close cooperation between a neurologist and a neurosurgeon is necessary to provide combined appropriate management promptly.
UNASSIGNED: Due to the relative rarity of SCI, multi-center studies of ischemia of the spinal cord and its treatment would be advisable in neurological practice to enhance current knowledge. A rapid diagnosis is crucial for appropriate care and desirable long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a serious complication that can occur at the onset of aortic aneurysm (AA) or after AA surgery. SCI impairs ambulation in patients. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding ambulatory status and its associated factors.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the ambulatory status of patients with SCI due to AA and/or AA surgery and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics factors associated with ambulatory status.
METHODS: A descriptive study using a retrospective medical record data was undertaken. Data were collected from the electronic health records of SCI patients resulting from AA or who underwent surgical intervention for AA from January 2009 through December 2021. We analyzed the data to determine the ambulatory status before discharge. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were investigated using chi-square and Fisher\'s exact tests to identify factors associated with ambulatory status.
RESULTS: Among the 4,142 patients diagnosed with AA, 30 developed SCI. Of these 30 AA patients with SCI, 63.3 % were male. The median age was 70 years, ranging from 39 to 89 years. Six had SCI at the time of AA diagnosis. Among the subset of 2,994 patients who underwent aortic surgery, 24 developed SCI postoperatively. At discharge, two-thirds of the SCI patients with AA were unable to ambulate, and almost half were bedridden. The factors associated with ambulatory status were length of stay, neurogenic bladder, and pressure ulcers.
CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with SCI due to AA and/or AA surgery are unable to walk before discharge. Length of stay, neurogenic bladder, and pressure ulcers were associated with poor ambulatory status. Older adults and those with medical comorbidities and complications are at particularly high risk for impaired ambulation.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord ischemia injury is a serious complication after intra-aortic surgery, with a low incidence but high disability rate. However, patients often do not receive comprehensive treatment in the early stages of the disease. Therefore, active neurological intervention is needed to protect and prevent spinal cord ischemia during and after surgery. In this paper, rehabilitation program and imaging data of 2 cases with spinal cord ischemic injury are presented and discussed regarding causes, prevention and acute treatment with this disease, which could be referred by clinicians.
METHODS: Case report 1: A 69-year-old male patient underwent aortic arch aneurysm and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (coated stent) was performed under general anesthesia. Complete paralysis of both lower limbs, constipation, and urinary retention occurred after surgery and was subsequently referred to our rehabilitation department. Case report 2: A man aged 41 years experienced sudden chest pain with no dizziness or headache. Weakness of both lower limbs gradually appeared over 30 minutes with subsequent loss of consciousness. He was diagnosed with aortic dissection and underwent aortic stent implantation. Inpatient rehabilitation began systematically 3 months after discharge.
METHODS: The 2 patients were diagnosed with paraplegia and spinal cord ischemic injury.
METHODS: The patients received strength and transfer training, sensory input, health mission, and activities of daily living.
RESULTS: Patient 1 returned home without assistive devices and patient 2 returned home with wheelchair.
CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative spinal cord protection is directly related to postoperative quality of life. Once the symptoms of spinal cord ischemic injury occur, cerebrospinal fluid drainage should be performed as soon as possible to increase mean arterial pressure. At the same time, methylprednisolone, ganglioside, anticoagulation, vasodilator drugs, and symptomatic supportive treatments are required. Intercostal artery and subclavian artery are reconstructed if necessary. Symptom stability flags referral to commence rehabilitation. Repetitive functional training is necessary to help patients return to the family and society as soon as possible.

UNASSIGNED: Repair of pararenal aneurysms poses a challenge, especially in an urgent setting. Despite the minimally invasive nature of the fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair, the technique may require extensive coverage of the aorta, increasing the risk of spinal cord ischemia.
UNASSIGNED: A 68-year-old man was admitted with a rapid enlargement of an asymptomatic juxtarenal aortic aneurysm. A minimally invasive treatment with an off-the-shelf branched endovascular graft was planned. Before completing the aneurysm exclusion, an angiography highlighted a large lumbar artery, potentially significant for the perfusion of the spinal cord collateral network. Owing to this finding and an unsuccessful placement of the cerebrospinal fluid drainage, the procedure was staged and completed 5 days later using a physician-modified iliac branch device (IBD) for the segmental artery. The device was shortened and reversely loaded to obtain a cranially-oriented branch. A balloon-expandable covered stent was used to connect the retrograde branch (8 mm) to the lumbar artery (4 mm). Pre-discharge computed tomography (CT)-angiography confirmed the vessel patency. No neurological symptoms occurred.
UNASSIGNED: The use of a reversely-loaded IBD for segmental artery preservation appears feasible and safe.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative modification of an iliac branch device during an urgent branched endovascular aortic repair enabled preservation of a potentially critical segmental artery, thus reducing the risk of spinal cord ischemia. This adaptive interventional technique may also offer a strategy for preserving other anatomically significant vessels, such as accessory renal arteries, during complex aortic reconstructions in urgent settings.

Severe thrombocytopenia after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair poses a significant clinical risk in the immediate postoperative period. Understanding the mechanisms of refractoriness to platelet transfusion is relevant to supporting thrombocytopenic patients postoperatively. We present the case of a 76-year-old woman with refractory thrombocytopenia secondary to alloimmunization following open repair of a Crawford extent IV thoracoabdominal aneurysm. The patient provided written informed consent for the report of her case details and imaging studies.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral diaphragmatic dysfunction can lead to dyspnea and recurrent respiratory failure. In rare cases, it may result from high cervical spinal cord ischemia (SCI) due to anterior spinal artery syndrome (ASAS). We present a case of a patient experiencing persistent isolated diaphragmatic paralysis after SCI at level C3/C4 following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Kommerell\'s diverticulum. This is, to our knowledge, the first documented instance of a patient fully recovering from tetraplegia due to SCI while still exhibiting ongoing bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis.
METHODS: The patient, a 67-year-old male, presented to the Vascular Surgery Department for surgical treatment of symptomatic Kommerell\'s diverticulum in an aberrant right subclavian artery. After successful surgery in two stages, the patient presented with respiratory insufficiency and flaccid tetraparesis consistent with anterior spinal artery syndrome with maintained sensibility of all extremities. A computerized tomography scan (CT) revealed a high-grade origin stenosis of the left vertebral artery, which was treated by angioplasty and balloon-expandable stenting. Consecutively, the tetraparesis immediately resolved, but weaning remained unsuccessful requiring tracheostomy. Abdominal ultrasound revealed a residual bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis. A repeated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 14 days after vertebral artery angioplasty confirmed SCI at level C3/C4. The patient was transferred to a pulmonary clinic with weaning center for further recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: This novel case highlights the need to consider diaphragmatic paralysis due to SCI as a cause of respiratory failure in patients following aortic surgery. Diaphragmatic paralysis may remain as an isolated residual in these patients.