UNASSIGNED: The protective effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors on the kidneys has been widely recognized. However, limited research has reported the changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of real-world patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) over time after administration of SGLT-2 inhibitors. This study aimed to reflect the trend of eGFR changes over time in T2DM patients having different baseline eGFR after SGLT-2 inhibitors administration in the real world.
UNASSIGNED: A single-center retrospective study was performed in a tertiary public hospital in Beijing, China. In total, 998 outpatients with T2DM who initiated SGLT-2 inhibitors treatment were included in the study. The changes in eGFR, urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR), and glycolipid metabolism indicators were analyzed during the 18-month follow-up period.
UNASSIGNED: The eGFR levels significantly decreased to their lowest point (-3.04 mL/min/1.73 m2) in the first 3 months after initiation of SGLT-2 inhibitors treatment, however, gradually returned to the baseline level after 1 year. Compared to the subgroup with eGFR >90 mL/min/1.73 m2, improvements in renal function were more significant in patients with T2DM from the 60 < eGFR ≤90 mL/min/1.73 m2 and eGFR ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m2 subgroups after treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors. Similarly, SGLT-2 inhibitors reduced the UACR in patients with diabetic nephropathy.
UNASSIGNED: This study further confirmed the real-world long-term protective effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on the kidneys of patients with T2DM, which is not related to baseline renal function and blood glucose.

暂无摘要。

The newfound knowledge in type 2 diabetes (T2D) during the past decade for the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) is wealthy in favorable results for key patient-important outcomes including morbidity, mortality and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA offer cardiovascular and renal protection beyond their glucose lowering effect, reduce body weight and hypoglycemia and improve diabetes-related distress, physical function and HRQoL. Along with the fixed-ratio combinations of basal insulin/GLP-1RA, they make feasible a regimen simplification and de-escalation from high dose and multiple injections of insulin reducing treatment burden. Besides cardiorenal risk reduction, the SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA reduce the incidence of depression, cognitive decline, respiratory disease, gout, arrhythmias and other co-occurring conditions of T2D, namely multimorbidity, which frequently complicates T2D and adversely affects HRQoL. The alleviation of multimorbidity by the pleiotropic effects of the SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA, could improve patients\' HRQoL. The use of the SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA should be increased within a shared decision-making in which they are reframed as cardiorenal risk-reducing medications with the potential to lower blood glucose. By improving outcomes that patients may highly perceive and value, the SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA may facilitate the contemporary person-centered management of T2D.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of vision-threatening retinopathy between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) use and no use in patients with type 2 diabetes.
METHODS: Using propensity score matching, we identified 27,506 pairs of GLP-1 RA users and non-users, 3904 pairs of GLP-1 RA and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) users, 10,985 pairs of GLP-1 RA and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) users, 2542 pairs of GLP-1 RA and sulfonylurea, respectively, from Taiwan\'s National Health Insurance Research Database from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2018. We used Cox proportional hazards models to compare the risk of vision-threatening retinopathy between GLP-1 RA use and other matched groups.
RESULTS: In the matched cohorts, the time-varying exposure analysis showed that GLP-1 RA use was not associated with an increased risk of vision-threatening retinopathy compared to GLP-1 RA non-use (aHR 0.96, 95 % CI 0.89-1.03). New-user and active-comparator analyses showed that GLP-1 RA was associated with a significantly lower risk of vision-threatening retinopathy than DPP-4i (aHR 0.8, 95 % CI 0.66-0.97) but had no significant association with this risk compared to SGLT2i (aHR 1.09, 95 % CI 0.96-1.24) or sulfonylureas (aHR 0.79, 95 % CI 0.49-1.06).
CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide cohort study showed that GLP-1 RA use was not associated with an increased risk of vision-threatening retinopathy compared to non- GLP-1 RA use, and GLP-1 RA could significantly lower the risk of vision-threatening retinopathy than DPP-4i.

OBJECTIVE: Sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT)-2 inhibitors are novel anti-diabetic medications with potential beneficial effects on cardiovascular and renal outcomes, metabolic parameters, and body weight. In addition to the beneficial effects on renal functions, including estimated glomerular filtration rate and reduction in proteinuria, recent studies have investigated the potential role of SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy on nephrolithiasis development. Nephrolithiasis, a condition affecting almost 10% of the general population at least once during a lifetime, is a common disorder with considerable risk for acute and chronic kidney injury and relatively few effective therapeutic options.
METHODS: We have performed a literature search through multiple databases, including PubMed, Ovid/Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. We have followed the systematic review and meta-analysis guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.We have included a total of 11 635 698 patients who experienced nephrolithiasis from six clinical trials to conduct this meta-analysis study. In the pooled analysis, nephrolithiasis occurred in 1,27% of patients from the SGLT2i group (n = 739 197), compared to 1,56% of patients (n = 10 896 501) from the control arm (active control, placebo or no therapy).
RESULTS: We have included a total of 11 635 698 participants who experienced nephrolithiasis from a total of six clinical studies with nephrolithiasis rates of 1,27% in the SGLT2i group (n = 739 197), compared to 1,56% in the control arm (n = 10 896 501). SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy has been associated with a lower risk for nephrolithiasis compared to placebo (OR 0.61, 95% CI, 0.53-0.70, p < 0.00001) or active therapy such as glucagon-like peptide 1 and dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors (OR 0.66, 95% CI, 0.47-0.93, p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated a lower risk of nephrolithiasis risk with SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy compared to placebo or active control. Potential underlying mechanisms include osmotic diuresis leading to a reduction in the concentration of lithogenic substances, anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects, and an increase in urine pH. There is a clear need for future large-scale randomized clinical trials evaluating such associations for better understanding.

BACKGROUND: The newer glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs), including Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), have demonstrated superior cardio- and renal protective benefits compared to older GLDs in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD).
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the trends of the newer GLDs use in people with T2D who had a history of coronary heart disease or heart failure in the United States.
METHODS: We used 2005-2019 data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Individuals with self-reported diabetes and CVD history were identified.
RESULTS: There was a steady increase in the use of GLP-1RA only from 2008 (3 %) to 2019 (21 %) and SGLT2i only from 2014 (5 %) to 2019 (12 %). Individuals with dual use of both newer GLD classes increased from 0.62 % in 2015 to 6 % in 2019. The overall uptake of these two newer drugs in 2019 was less than 40 %. In other words, 60 % of individuals who can substantially benefit from these newer treatments did not use the treatments.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i among individuals with T2D and a history of CVD was low and varied by insurance type. Policy-level interventions are needed to improve the use of these newer treatments further.
CONCLUSIONS: We examined how newer glucose-lowering drugs are used among individuals with type 2 diabetes and at high risk for coronary heart disease or heart failure in the US. We found that 60 % of individuals who can substantially benefit from these newer treatments did not use the treatments due to the variation of insurance type.

UNASSIGNED: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is an independent risk factor for the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) have recently been shown to decrease the incidence of AF through several mechanisms, including the reduction of atrial dilatation via diuresis and the lowering of body weight. In observational studies of diabetic patients, the use of thiazolidinedione (TZD) was found to have a protective effect on new-onset AF. In this study, we aimed to compare the effect of SGLT-2i and TZD on the risk of AF in patients with T2D.
UNASSIGNED: We enrolled 69,122 patients newly prescribed SGLT-2i and 94,262 patients prescribed TZD from January 2014 to December 2018, using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. We compared new-onset AF events (hospitalizations and outpatient events) in SGLT-2i and TZD groups after having taken medication for greater than 90 days.
UNASSIGNED: During a mean follow-up of 1.8 years, 397 (0.72%) new-onset AF events occurred in the SGLT-2i group and 432 (0.79%) events in the TZD group following propensity score matching (each group n = 54,993). The hazard ratio (HR) of AF was 0.918 (95% confidence interval: 0.783-1.076, p = 0.29) in SGLT-2i-treated patients compared with TZD-treated patients.
UNASSIGNED: In this study, the risk of new-onset AF is comparable in patients treated with SGLT-2i and TZD in T2D. Either SGLT-2i or TZD would be a reasonable choice for T2D patients who are at risk for AF.

UNASSIGNED: There is a lack of real-world evidence regarding the impact of concomitant metformin and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASis) on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i)-associated kidney outcomes. This study was aimed to investigate whether SGLT2i-associated kidney outcomes were modified by the concomitant use of metformin or RASis in patients with type 2 diabetes.
UNASSIGNED: SGLT2i users were identified from three electronic health record databases during May 2016 and December 2017 and categorized into those with and without concomitant use of metformin or RASis. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize baseline differences between groups. Study outcomes were mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) change and time to 30%, 40%, and 50% eGFR reductions. A meta-analysis was performed to combine the estimates across databases.
UNASSIGNED: After matching, there were 6,625 and 3,260 SGLT2i users with and without metformin, and 6,654 and 2,746 SGLT2i users with and without RASis, respectively. The eGFR dip was similar in SGLT2i users with and without metformin therapy, but was greater in SGLT2i users with RASis compared to those without RASis. Neither metformin nor RASi use had a significant effect on SGLT2i-associated eGFR reductions, as evidenced by the hazard ratios (95% CIs) of 30% eGFR reductions for SGLT2is with versus without metformin/RASis, namely 1.02 (0.87-1.20)/1.09 (0.92-1.31). Such findings were also observed in the outcomes of 40% and 50% eGFR reductions.
UNASSIGNED: Using metformin or RASis did not modify SGLT2i-associated kidney outcomes in type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains a prominent global cause of mortality, with coronary artery disease representing its most prevalent manifestation. Recently, a novel class of antidiabetic medication, namely sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, has been reported to have remarkable cardiorenal advantages for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and they may reduce cardiorenal risk even in individuals without pre-existing DM. Currently, there is no evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of these drugs in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), regardless of diabetes status. This review aims to comprehensively present the available preclinical and clinical evidence regarding the potential role of SGLT2 inhibitors in the context of ACS, as adjuncts to standard-of-care treatment for this patient population, while also discussing potential short- and long-term cardiovascular benefits.
METHODS: A literature search was performed through MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus until February 26, 2024. Eligible were preclinical and clinical studies, comprising randomized controlled trials (RCTs), real-world studies, and meta-analyses.
RESULTS: Evidence from preclinical models indicates that the use of SGLT2 inhibitors is associated with a blunted ischemia-reperfusion injury and decreased myocardial infarct size, particularly after prior treatment. Although RCTs and real-world data hint at a potential benefit in acute ischemic settings, showing improvements in left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, decongestion, and various cardiometabolic parameters such as glycemia,body weight, and blood pressure, the recently published DAPA-MI (Dapagliflozin in Myocardial Infarction without Diabetes or Heart Failure) trial did not establish a clear advantage regarding surrogate cardiovascular end points of interest. SGLT2 inhibitors appear to provide a benefit in reducing contrast-induced acute kidney injury events in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, data on other safety concerns, such as treatment discontinuation because of hypotension, hypovolemia, or ketoacidosis, are currently limited.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the well-established cardiovascular benefits observed in the general population with type 2 DM and, more recently, in other patient groups irrespective of diabetes status, existing evidence does not support the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in the context of ACS. Definitive answers to this intriguing research question, which could potentially expand the therapeutic indications of this novel drug class, require large-scale, well-designed RCTs.

Mitochondrial dysfunction is a key driver of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in metabolic syndrome and diabetes. This dysfunction promotes the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which cause oxidative stress and inflammation. Angiotensin II, the main mediator of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, also contributes to CVD by promoting ROS production. Reduced activity of sirtuins (SIRTs), a family of proteins that regulate cellular metabolism, also worsens oxidative stress. Reduction of energy production by mitochondria is a common feature of all metabolic disorders. High SIRT levels and 5\' adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase signaling stimulate hypoxia-inducible factor 1 beta, which promotes ketosis. Ketosis, in turn, increases autophagy and mitophagy, processes that clear cells of debris and protect against damage. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), a class of drugs used to treat type 2 diabetes, have a beneficial effect on these mechanisms. Randomized clinical trials have shown that SGLT2i improves cardiac function and reduces the rate of cardiovascular and renal events. SGLT2i also increase mitochondrial efficiency, reduce oxidative stress and inflammation, and strengthen tissues. These findings suggest that SGLT2i hold great potential for the treatment of CVD. Furthermore, they are proposed as anti-aging drugs; however, rigorous research is needed to validate these preliminary findings.