sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们评估了药代动力学,安全,在健康的西方和韩国参与者中,达格列净/西格列汀固定剂量组合(FDC)与单组分(IC)片剂的耐受性。这些抗高血糖药物的组合提供了有效的血糖控制,FDC的使用通常被证明可以改善2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的用药依从性.
    方法:两个随机,开放标签,两期,两种治疗,单剂量,单中心,纳入了对健康禁食的德国参与者(年龄18~55岁;西方研究)和韩国参与者(年龄19~55岁;韩国研究)进行的交叉生物等效性研究.在两项研究中,药代动力学参数(最大[峰值]血浆浓度[Cmax],从零到最后一个可量化浓度[AUClast]的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积,和从零到无穷大的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积[AUCinf])用于评估10mg达格列净/100mg西格列汀FDC(治疗A)与其IC(治疗B)在禁食条件下的生物等效性。在整个研究中评估安全性和耐受性。
    结果:46名健康参与者(男性,60.9%;平均年龄,39.5岁;平均体重指数[BMI],23.9kg/m2)在西方研究中随机分组,和51名健康参与者(男性,100.0%;平均年龄,24.6年;平均BMI,23.9kg/m2)在韩国研究中随机分配。在两项研究中,参与者以1:1随机分为治疗序列AB和治疗序列BA.在西方和韩国研究中,达格列净/西格列汀FDC与IC片剂生物等效,因为达格列净和西格列汀的药代动力学参数的几何最小二乘平均值的FDC与IC比值的90%置信区间均在0.8000~1.2500生物等效性标准界限内.观察到的药代动力学参数差异,比如Cmax,AUClast,AUCinf,西方和韩国的研究没有临床意义.达格列净/西格列汀FDC及其IC耐受性良好,在任何研究人群中均未报告严重不良事件。
    结论:10mg达格列净/100mg西格列汀FDC和IC制剂在禁食的西方和韩国健康参与者中具有生物等效性,没有发现新的安全问题,因此,为目前接受单独药物作为治疗方案一部分的患者提供了一种有用的替代方案。
    背景:西方研究(clinicaltrials.gov:NCT05266404)和韩国研究(clinicaltrials.gov:NCT05453786)。
    OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of dapagliflozin/sitagliptin versus individual component (IC) tablets in healthy Western and Korean participants. The combination of these antihyperglycemic drugs provides efficient glucose control, and the use of FDC has generally been shown to improve medication adherence in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
    METHODS: Two randomized, open-label, two-period, two-treatment, single-dose, single-center, crossover bioequivalence studies conducted on healthy fasted German participants (aged 18-55 years; Western study) and South Korean participants (aged 19-55 years; Korean study) were included. In both studies, pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum [peak] plasma concentration [Cmax], area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to the last quantifiable concentration [AUClast], and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity [AUCinf]) were used to assess the bioequivalence of 10 mg dapagliflozin/100 mg sitagliptin FDC (Treatment A) with their ICs (Treatment B) under fasted conditions. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study.
    RESULTS: Forty-six healthy participants (male, 60.9%; mean age, 39.5 years; mean body mass index [BMI], 23.9 kg/m2) were randomized in the Western study, and 51 healthy participants (male, 100.0%; mean age, 24.6 years; mean BMI, 23.9 kg/m2) were randomized in the Korean study. In both studies, the participants were randomized 1:1 into treatment sequence AB and treatment sequence BA. Dapagliflozin/sitagliptin FDC was bioequivalent to IC tablets in both Western and Korean studies, as the 90% confidence interval of the FDC to IC ratios of the geometric least-squares means of the pharmacokinetic parameters for both dapagliflozin and sitagliptin was within the 0.8000-1.2500 bioequivalence criterion limit. The observed differences in pharmacokinetic parameters, such as Cmax, AUClast, and AUCinf, between the Western and Korean studies were not clinically meaningful. Dapagliflozin/sitagliptin FDC and their ICs were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported in any of the study populations.
    CONCLUSIONS: The 10 mg dapagliflozin/100 mg sitagliptin FDC and IC formulations were bioequivalent in fasted healthy Western and Korean participants, with no new safety concerns identified, thus offering a useful alternative for patients currently receiving individual medications as part of their treatment regimen.
    BACKGROUND: Western study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05266404) and Korean study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05453786).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    糖尿病心肌病(DCM)是糖尿病人群死亡率的主要决定因素,和潜在的战略是不够的。Canagliflozin已成为糖尿病的潜在心脏保护剂,然而其潜在的分子机制仍不清楚。我们在体外对大鼠心肌细胞(H9C2)进行了高葡萄糖攻击(60mM,48小时),有或没有canagliflozin治疗(20µM)。在体内,雄性C57BL/6J小鼠接受链脲佐菌素和高脂肪饮食诱导糖尿病,随后给予canagliflozin(10,30mg·kg-1·d-1)12周。蛋白质组学和超声心动图用于评估心脏。通过使用油红O和Masson三色染色评估组织病理学改变。此外,通过生化和成像技术分析线粒体形态和线粒体自噬。蛋白质组学分析强调了用canagliflozin治疗后线粒体和自噬相关蛋白的变化。糖尿病患者线粒体呼吸和ATP产生受损,同时降低PINK1-Parkin通路的相关表达。高糖条件也降低了PGC-1α-TFAM信号,负责线粒体生物发生。Canagliflozin在体外和体内均可显着减轻心脏功能障碍并改善线粒体功能。具体来说,canagliflozin抑制线粒体氧化应激,提高ATP水平和维持线粒体呼吸能力。它激活了PINK1-Parkin依赖性线粒体自噬,并通过增加磷酸腺苷激活的蛋白激酶(AMPK)的磷酸化来改善线粒体功能。值得注意的是,PINK1敲低否定了canagliflozin对线粒体完整性的有益作用,强调PINK1在介导这些保护作用中的关键作用。Canagliflozin促进PINK1-Parkin线粒体自噬和线粒体功能,强调了其作为DCM有效治疗方法的潜力。
    Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a major determinant of mortality in diabetic populations, and the potential strategies are insufficient. Canagliflozin has emerged as a potential cardioprotective agent in diabetes, yet its underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. We employed a high-glucose challenge (60 mM for 48 h) in vitro to rat cardiomyocytes (H9C2), with or without canagliflozin treatment (20 µM). In vivo, male C57BL/6J mice were subjected to streptozotocin and a high-fat diet to induce diabetes, followed by canagliflozin administration (10, 30 mg·kg-1·d-1) for 12 weeks. Proteomics and echocardiography were used to assess the heart. Histopathological alterations were assessed by the use of Oil Red O and Masson\'s trichrome staining. Additionally, mitochondrial morphology and mitophagy were analyzed through biochemical and imaging techniques. A proteomic analysis highlighted alterations in mitochondrial and autophagy-related proteins after the treatment with canagliflozin. Diabetic conditions impaired mitochondrial respiration and ATP production, alongside decreasing the related expression of the PINK1-Parkin pathway. High-glucose conditions also reduced PGC-1α-TFAM signaling, which is responsible for mitochondrial biogenesis. Canagliflozin significantly alleviated cardiac dysfunction and improved mitochondrial function both in vitro and in vivo. Specifically, canagliflozin suppressed mitochondrial oxidative stress, enhancing ATP levels and sustaining mitochondrial respiratory capacity. It activated PINK1-Parkin-dependent mitophagy and improved mitochondrial function via increased phosphorylation of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Notably, PINK1 knockdown negated the beneficial effects of canagliflozin on mitochondrial integrity, underscoring the critical role of PINK1 in mediating these protective effects. Canagliflozin fosters PINK1-Parkin mitophagy and mitochondrial function, highlighting its potential as an effective treatment for DCM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肥胖的特征在于脂肪组织(主要是内脏)的过度积累。线粒体的形态和功能对于调节脂肪褐变和体重减轻至关重要。研究表明,SGLT2抑制剂canagliflozin可能通过未知的机制诱导体重减轻,特别是针对内脏脂肪组织。虽然已知Krueppel样因子4(KLF4)对于能量代谢和线粒体功能至关重要,其对内脏脂肪组织的具体影响尚不清楚.我们给db/db小鼠服用canagliflozin8周,或将脂肪细胞暴露于canagliflozin24小时。褐变标记的表达水平,线粒体动力学,和KLF4进行评估。然后我们通过体内和体外过表达验证了KLF4的功能。一磷酸腺苷活化蛋白激酶(AMPK)激动剂,抑制剂,和KLF4si-RNA用于阐明AMPK和KLF4之间的关系。研究结果表明,canagliflozin可显着降低db/db小鼠的体重,并增强了冷诱导的产热作用。此外,canagliflozin增加线粒体融合相关因子的表达,同时降低附睾白色脂肪组织中裂变标志物的水平。这些一致的发现反映在canagliflozin处理的脂肪细胞中。同样,KLF4在脂肪细胞和db/db小鼠中的过表达产生了相当的结果。总之,canagliflozin通过AMPK/KLF4信号增强线粒体融合促进棕色内脏脂肪细胞表型,从而减轻db/db小鼠的肥胖。
    Obesity is characterized by excessive accumulation of adipose tissue (mainly visceral). The morphology and function of mitochondria are crucial for regulating adipose browning and weight loss. Research suggests that the SGLT2 inhibitor canagliflozin may induce weight loss through an unknown mechanism, particularly targeting visceral adipose tissue. While Krueppel-Like Factor 4 (KLF4) is known to be essential for energy metabolism and mitochondrial function, its specific impact on visceral adipose tissue remains unclear. We administered canagliflozin to db/db mice for 8 weeks, or exposed adipocytes to canagliflozin for 24 h. The expression levels of browning markers, mitochondrial dynamics, and KLF4 were assessed. Then we validated the function of KLF4 through overexpression in vivo and in vitro. Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) agonists, inhibitors, and KLF4 si-RNA were employed to elucidate the relationship between AMPK and KLF4. The findings demonstrated that canagliflozin significantly decreased body weight in db/db mice and augmented cold-induced thermogenesis. Additionally, canagliflozin increased the expression of mitochondrial fusion-related factors while reducing the levels of fission markers in epididymal white adipose tissue. These consistent findings were mirrored in canagliflozin-treated adipocytes. Similarly, overexpression of KLF4 in both adipocytes and db/db mice yielded comparable results. In all, canagliflozin mitigates obesity in db/db mice by promoting the brown visceral adipocyte phenotype through enhanced mitochondrial fusion via AMPK/KLF4 signaling.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    儿童超重和肥胖的发生率不断增加,随后青年发病的2型糖尿病(T2D)大幅增加。青年发病T2D的药物治疗选择仍然有限,对额外的口服药物有明显的未满足的需求。本研究总结报道了依帕列净和利格列汀对10-17岁T2D儿童和青少年血糖控制的疗效和安全性,双盲,平行组,第三阶段DINAMO试验。Empagliflozin提供了一种临床相关的,统计显著,和血糖控制的持久改善;然而,利格列汀没有。依帕列净和利格列汀的安全性与成人研究中观察到的安全性相当。这些结果表明,依帕列净可能是青年发病的T2D的一种新的口服治疗选择。
    The increasing occurrence of childhood overweight and obesity has been followed by a substantial increase in youth-onset type 2 diabetes (T2D). Pharmacological treatment options for youth-onset T2D remain limited, with a clear unmet need for additional oral agents. This summary of research reports on the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin and linagliptin on glycaemic control in children and adolescents aged 10-17 years with T2D in the randomised, double-blind, parallel group, phase 3 DINAMO trial. Empagliflozin provided a clinically relevant, statistically significant, and durable improvement in glycaemic control; however, linagliptin did not. The safety profile of both empagliflozin and linagliptin was comparable to those observed in studies in adults. These results suggest that empagliflozin could be a new oral therapy option for youth-onset T2D.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:二甲双胍被推荐为2型糖尿病治疗指南中的一线药物。然而,缺乏来自临床试验的高质量证据,直接比较二甲双胍和具有不同作用机制的降血糖药的联合治疗与降血糖药的单药治疗的降血糖作用程度。我们的目的是研究降糖药与二甲双胍的联合治疗是否具有拮抗作用,addition,在血红蛋白A1c水平方面,与二甲双胍以外的降血糖药单药治疗相比或协同作用。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究使用了日本的医学信息数据库。具有不同作用机制的非胰岛素抗高血糖药分为八类药物。定义了单一治疗队列和加入二甲双胍队列的联合治疗。评估血红蛋白A1c水平的变化以比较队列之间的治疗效果。
    结果:在单药治疗队列中共有13,359例2型糖尿病患者,在二甲双胍联合治疗队列中共有1,064例。两组之间药物类别的基线HbA1c水平变化的比较显示出相似的趋势。在用二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂治疗的患者中,两组之间没有观察到临床显着差异(未经调整的0.00%和-0.07%,0.15%和-0.03%的倾向得分匹配调整,和0.09%和-0.01%的逆概率处理加权调整分析)。
    结论:根据本研究的结果,二甲双胍中加入二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂或钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂对降低血红蛋白A1c的作用似乎是相加的.
    Metformin is recommended as a first-line drug in the guidelines of the treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, high-quality evidence from clinical trials directly comparing the degree of hypoglycemic effect of combination therapy of metformin and a hypoglycemic agent with a different mechanism of action with that of monotherapy of a hypoglycemic drug is lacking. We aimed to examine whether combination therapy of hypoglycemic agents with metformin showed antagonism, addition, or synergism compared to monotherapy with hypoglycemic agents other than metformin regarding hemoglobin A1c levels.
    This retrospective cohort study used a medical information database in Japan. Non-insulin anti-hyperglycemic agents with different mechanisms of action were classified into eight drug classes. A monotherapy cohort and a combination therapy added to the metformin cohort were defined. The change in hemoglobin A1c levels was evaluated to compare the treatment effect between the cohorts.
    A total of 13,359 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the monotherapy cohort and 1,064 in the metformin combination therapy cohort were identified. A comparison of the change from baseline HbA1c level by drug class between the two cohorts showed a similar trend. Among those treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, no clinically significant difference was observed between the two cohorts (0.00% and -0.07% for unadjusted, 0.15% and -0.03% for propensity score matching-adjusted, and 0.09% and -0.01% for inverse probability treatment weighting-adjusted analysis).
    According to the results of this study, the effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor or sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor added to metformin seems to be additive with respect to the reduction in hemoglobin A1c.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性心力衰竭(HF)的住院是开始和增加指南指导的药物治疗的重要机会。本研究旨在确定钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2I)在急性HF住院患者中的使用是否安全,以及其使用是否与改善临床结局相关。我们进行了一个单中心,回顾性队列研究对因急性HF而住院的任何射血分数的成年人进行研究,并根据住院患者SGLT2I的使用情况将他们分为2个匹配的组.该匹配在SGLT2I组中产生110名患者,在对照组中产生110名患者。SGLT2I组共101例患者(91.8%)接受达格列净治疗,而9例(8.2%)患者接受了依帕列净治疗。平均年龄是71岁,37.7%是女性,70.9%是白人,22.7%是黑人,64.1%是西班牙裔或拉丁裔。SGLT2I组的住院时间为10天,对照组为11天(p=0.43)。SGLT2I组共2例(1.8%)和对照组13例(11.8%)在出院后30天内死亡(风险比0.15,95%置信区间[CI]0.03至0.66,p=0.012)。SGLT2I组共17例患者(15.5%)和对照组11例患者(10.0%)在30天内再次住院(风险比1.58,95%CI0.74至3.37,p=0.239)。此外,SGLT2I组的11例患者(10.0%)和对照组的3例患者(2.7%)在30天内再次入院(风险比3.75,95%CI1.05至13.44,p=0.042)。急性肾损伤(54.5%vs18.2%,p<0.001)和低血压(12.7%vs2.7%,p=0.005)在对照组中发生的频率明显更高。总之,在因急性心力衰竭住院的患者中使用SGLT2I与降低30天全因死亡率和降低急性肾损伤和低血压的发生率相关;然而,30天HF再入院率增加。
    Hospitalization for acute heart failure (HF) represents an important opportunity for initiation and up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapy. This study aimed to determine whether sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2I) use is safe in patients hospitalized for acute HF and whether its use is associated with improved clinical outcomes. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adults hospitalized for acute HF with any ejection fraction and separated them into 2 matched groups based on inpatient SGLT2I use. The matching yielded 110 patients in the SGLT2I group and 110 patients in the control group. A total of 101 patients (91.8%) in the SGLT2I group were treated with dapagliflozin, whereas 9 (8.2%) were treated with empagliflozin. The mean age was 71 years, 37.7% were women, 70.9% were White, 22.7% were Black, and 64.1% were Hispanic or Latino. The length of stay was 10 days in the SGLT2I group and 11 days in the control group (p = 0.43). A total of 2 patients (1.8%) in the SGLT2I group and 13 patients (11.8%) in the control group died within 30 days of discharge (hazard ratio 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03 to 0.66, p = 0.012). A total of 17 patients (15.5%) in the SGLT2I group and 11 patients (10.0%) in the control group had an all-cause readmission within 30 days (hazard ratio 1.58, 95% CI 0.74 to 3.37, p = 0.239). In addition, 11 patients (10.0%) in the SGLT2I group and 3 patients (2.7%) in the control group had an HF readmission within 30 days (hazard ratio 3.75, 95% CI 1.05 to 13.44, p = 0.042). Acute kidney injury (54.5% vs 18.2%, p <0.001) and hypotension (12.7% vs 2.7%, p = 0.005) occurred significantly more frequently in the control group. In conclusion, SGLT2I use in patients hospitalized for acute HF was associated with decreased 30-day all-cause mortality and lower rates of acute kidney injury and hypotension; however, the rate of 30-day HF readmission increased.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:缺血性心脏病的存在会影响心力衰竭和射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者的预后。在这种情况下,血管疾病的程度如何影响预后和对治疗的反应尚不清楚。
    方法:在对EMPEROR减少试验的事后分析中,结果,和依帕列净的作用,在研究参与者中根据程度进行评估(无与单[1]vs.血管疾病的聚[≥2]血管床)。血管疾病定义为研究者报告的冠状动脉疾病(CAD),外周动脉疾病(PAD),和基线时的脑血管疾病。Cox比例风险模型用于计算风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。发病率是每100人年(py)随访一次。
    结果:在3,730名研究参与者中,1324(35.5%)没有,1879年(50.4%)有单声道,527例(14.1%)患有多血管疾病。患有多血管疾病的参与者往往年龄较大,男性,有高血压病史,糖尿病,和吸烟。在安慰剂组,多血管疾病患者的心血管死亡风险显著较高(HR1.57,95CI1.02,2.44与非血管疾病相比).在调整后的分析中,依帕列净对心血管死亡或HF住院的益处,HF住院治疗,心血管死亡,肾复合终点,估计的肾小球滤过斜率变化,和健康状况评分,在三组中均可见(所有相互作用P>0.05),但在患有多血管疾病的患者中均减弱。多血管疾病患者的不良事件较高,但三组中依帕列净或安慰剂分配之间没有重大差异。
    结论:在HFrEF患者中,血管疾病的程度与不良心血管结局的风险相关.Empagliflozin在整个血管疾病范围内提供HFrEF的心血管和肾脏益处,但这种益处在多血管疾病患者中减弱。
    BACKGROUND: The presence of ischemic heart disease impacts prognosis in patients affected by heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). It is not well known how the extent of vascular disease impacts prognoses and responses to therapy in this setting.
    METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced trial, outcomes and the effects of empagliflozin, were assessed in study participants according to the extent (none vs mono1 vs poly [≥ 2] vascular bed) of vascular disease. Vascular disease was defined as investigator-reported coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral artery disease (PAD) and cerebrovascular disease at baseline. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Incidence rates are presented per 100 person-years (py) of follow-up.
    RESULTS: Of the 3730 study participants enrolled, 1324 (35.5%) had no vascular disease, 1879 (50.4%) had monovascular disease, and 527 (14.1%) had polyvascular disease. Participants with polyvascular disease tended to be older and male and to have had histories of hypertension, diabetes and smoking. In the placebo arm, a significantly higher risk for cardiovascular death existed in those with polyvascular disease (HR 1.57, 95% CI1.02, 2.44, compared to those with no vascular disease). In adjusted analysis, the benefit of empagliflozin in cardiovascular death or hospitalization due to HF, HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, renal composite endpoint, estimated glomerular filtration slope changes, and health status scores were seen across the 3 groups (interaction P > 0.05 for all) but were attenuated in those with polyvascular disease. Adverse events were higher in those with polyvascular disease, but no major differences were noted between empagliflozin or placebo assignment in the 3 groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HFrEF, the extent of vascular disease is associated with the risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Empagliflozin offers cardiovascular and renal benefits in HFrEF across the extent of vascular disease, but this benefit is attenuated in those with polyvascular disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂,在DAPA-CKD试验中,达格列净(DAPA)降低了慢性肾病(CKD)患者的白蛋白尿并减缓了估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的下降.然而,在真实世界的临床环境中,所有患者的蛋白尿(白蛋白尿)不一定都会减少.因此,我们旨在确定CKD患者对DAPA治疗的蛋白尿减少的临床特征.
    方法:106例CKD患者,最终包括54名患者,他们每天一次接受10mgDAPA。治疗1个月后尿蛋白与肌酐比值(UPCR)从基线下降>30%或≤30%的患者被定义为反应者和无反应者。分别。
    结果:在基线时,eGFR和UPCR中位数为45.3毫升/分钟/1.73平方米(四分位距[IQR],29.7、54.6)和1.09g/gCr(IQR,0.52,1.91),分别。治疗1个月后,eGFR的平均下降和UPCR的降低为6.5%(标准偏差[SD],7.2%)和6.6%(标准差,42.1%)从基线,分别。此外,血压,eGFR,尿酸从基线显着下降,但血红蛋白和血清钾没有变化。UPCR≥0.5g/gCr患者的中位UPCR显著下降,但在基线时不<0.5g/gCr。UPCR应答者在1个月时eGFR的初始下降幅度大于非应答者。
    结论:在DAPA治疗1个月后,在基线时UPCR≥0.5g/gCr的CKD患者中,UPCR的变化百分比与eGFR的初始下降率呈正相关。
    OBJECTIVE: Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, dapagliflozin (DAPA) reduced albuminuria and slowed down the decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the DAPA-CKD trial. However, proteinuria (albuminuria) does not necessarily decrease in all patients in real-world clinical settings. Therefore, we aimed to identify the clinical characteristics of patients with CKD and decreased proteinuria in response to DAPA treatment.
    METHODS: Of 106 patients with CKD, 54 patients were finally included who received 10 mg of DAPA once daily. Patients whose urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) decreased by >30% or ≤30% from baseline after 1 month of treatment were defined as responders and non-responders, respectively.
    RESULTS: At baseline, median eGFR and UPCR were 45.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 (interquartile range [IQR], 29.7, 54.6) and 1.09 g/gCr (IQR, 0.52, 1.91), respectively. After 1 month of treatment, the mean decline in eGFR and reduction in UPCR was 6.5% (standard deviation [SD], 7.2%) and 6.6% (SD, 42.1%) from baseline, respectively. Moreover, the blood pressure, eGFR, and uric acid decreased significantly from baseline, but haemoglobin and serum potassium did not change. The median UPCR decreased significantly in patients with UPCR ≥0.5 g/gCr, but not <0.5 g/gCr at baseline. UPCR responders had a greater initial decline in eGFR at 1 month than non-responders.
    CONCLUSIONS: The percent changes in UPCR were positively associated with the initial decline rate in eGFR in patients with CKD with a UPCR ≥0.5 g/gCr at baseline after 1 month of DAPA treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,肌少症肥胖被认为是糖尿病的主要病理因素。本研究旨在比较luseogliflozin的效果,钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2i),与低碳水化合物饮食(LCD)相比,关于少肌症性肥胖。20周龄雄性db/db小鼠饲喂正常饮食(Ctrl),LCD,和0.01%w/wluseogliflozin(SGLT2i)的正常饮食,持续八周。与对照组相比,LCD组小鼠的骨骼肌质量和握力下降,而它们在SGLT2i组小鼠中增加。肝脏中的氨基酸含量,骨骼肌,LCD组小鼠血清低于Ctrl组,但SGLT2i组小鼠血清升高。LCD组小鼠直肠粪便中短链脂肪酸含量低于Ctrl组,而它们在SGLT2i组小鼠中更高。丰富的伽马变形菌,肠杆菌科,埃希氏菌,肠杆菌,与其他两组相比,LCD组的拟杆菌属物种增加,而大量的脂环素,Syntrophomonadaceae科,副杆菌,SGLT2i组的厌氧菌属增加。Luseogliflozin可以通过改善氨基酸代谢来预防肌肉减少性肥胖。
    In recent years, sarcopenic obesity has been considered central pathological factors in diabetes. This study aimed to compare the effect of luseogliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), on sarcopenic obesity in comparison to that of a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD). Twenty-week-old male db/db mice were fed a normal diet (Ctrl), LCD, and normal diet with 0.01% w/w luseogliflozin (SGLT2i) for eight weeks. Skeletal muscle mass and grip strength decreased in the LCD group mice compared to those in the control group, while they increased in the SGLT2i group mice. The amino acid content in the liver, skeletal muscle, and serum were lower in the LCD group than those in the Ctrl group but increased in the SGLT2i group mice. Short-chain fatty acids in rectal feces were lower in the LCD group mice than those in the Ctrl group, whereas they were higher in the SGLT2i group mice. The abundance of Gammaproteobacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia, Enterobacterales, and Bacteroides caccae species increased in the LCD group compared to the other two groups, whereas the abundance of Syntrophothermus lipocalidus, Syntrophomonadaceae family, Parabacteroidesdistasonis distasonis, and the genus Anaerotignum increased in the SGLT2i group. Luseogliflozin could prevent sarcopenic obesity by improving amino acid metabolism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近因心力衰竭(HF)住院的患者再次住院和死亡的风险很高。
    本研究的目的是调查在住院期间或住院后左心室射血分数(LVEF)轻度降低或保留的HF患者的临床结果和对达格列净的反应。
    DELIVER(Dapagliflozin评价改善保留射血分数心力衰竭患者的生活)试验将HF和LVEF>40%的患者随机分配给Dapagliflozin或安慰剂。对于不接受静脉内HF治疗的临床稳定患者,DELIVER允许在因HF住院期间或之后不久进行随机化。这项预设的分析调查了近期HF住院是否改变了临床事件的风险或对达格列净的反应。主要结果是恶化的HF事件或心血管死亡。
    在交付的6,263名患者中,654(10.4%)在HF住院期间或出院后30天内随机分组。多变量校正后,近期HF住院与主要结局风险增加相关(HR:1.88;95%CI:1.60-2.21;P<0.001)。Dapagliflozin在最近住院的患者中降低了22%的主要结局(HR:0.78;95%CI:0.60-1.03),在没有最近住院的患者中降低了18%(HR:0.82;95%CI:0.72-0.94;P交互作用=0.71)。不良事件发生率,包括体积消耗,糖尿病酮症酸中毒,或肾脏事件,在最近住院的患者中,达格列净和安慰剂相似。
    Dapagliflozin可安全地降低有或无近期HF住院史的患者HF恶化或心血管死亡的风险。LVEF轻度降低或保留的患者在HF住院期间或之后不久开始达格列净似乎是安全有效的。(Dapagliflozin评估以改善射血分数保留性心力衰竭患者的生活[递送];NCT03619213)。
    Patients recently hospitalized for heart failure (HF) are at high risk for rehospitalization and death.
    The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical outcomes and response to dapagliflozin in patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who were enrolled during or following hospitalization.
    The DELIVER (Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the LIVES of Patients With PReserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure) trial randomized patients with HF and LVEF >40% to dapagliflozin or placebo. DELIVER permitted randomization during or shortly after hospitalization for HF in clinically stable patients off intravenous HF therapies. This prespecified analysis investigated whether recent HF hospitalization modified risk of clinical events or response to dapagliflozin. The primary outcome was worsening HF event or cardiovascular death.
    Of 6,263 patients in DELIVER, 654 (10.4%) were randomized during HF hospitalization or within 30 days of discharge. Recent HF hospitalization was associated with greater risk of the primary outcome after multivariable adjustment (HR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.60-2.21; P < 0.001). Dapagliflozin reduced the primary outcome by 22% in recently hospitalized patients (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.60-1.03) and 18% in patients without recent hospitalization (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.72-0.94; Pinteraction = 0.71). Rates of adverse events, including volume depletion, diabetic ketoacidosis, or renal events, were similar with dapagliflozin and placebo in recently hospitalized patients.
    Dapagliflozin safely reduced risk of worsening HF or cardiovascular death similarly in patients with and without history of recent HF hospitalization. Starting dapagliflozin during or shortly after HF hospitalization in patients with mildly reduced or preserved LVEF appears safe and effective. (Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the LIVEs of Patients With PReserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure [DELIVER]; NCT03619213).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号