social vulnerability index

社会脆弱性指数
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在基于地方的风险指数(如CDC的社会脆弱性指数(SVI))中忽略超出当地居住环境的工作场所暴露,可能会通过低估风险并掩盖种族/族裔健康差异的真正驱动因素来错误地分类社区暴露。为了研究这个假设,我们开发了几个基于地点的职业暴露指标,并检查了它们与种族/民族的关系,SVI,和健康不平等。我们使用了美国(US)人口普查的公开工作暴露矩阵和就业估算值,为美国每个人口普查区创建并绘制了六个职业危害指标。我们以工作场所SVI得分高,SVI得分低的人口普查区进行了表征。我们使用自然立方样条来检查种族/族裔少数群体(非西班牙裔白人)的百分比与职业指标之间的联系。最后,我们将每个人口普查区分为高/低职业噪音,化学污染物,和疾病/感染暴露,以检查糖尿病的种族/族裔健康差异,哮喘,还有高血压,分别,由于职业暴露不平等。我们的结果表明,种族/少数民族社区,特别是那些低收入的人,经历工作场所暴露的不成比例的负担,这可能会导致种族/族裔健康差异。当复合风险度量时,比如SVI,仅使用当地居民区的信息计算,他们可能会系统地低估最脆弱社区所经历的职业风险。有必要考虑职业司法在全国范围内的作用,种族/民族健康差异。
    Ignoring workplace exposures that occur beyond the local residential context in place-based risk indices like the CDC\'s Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) likely misclassifies community exposure by under-counting risks and obscuring true drivers of racial/ethnic health disparities. To investigate this hypothesis, we developed several place-based indicators of occupational exposure and examined their relationships with race/ethnicity, SVI, and health inequities. We used publicly available job exposure matrices and employment estimates from the United States (US) Census to create and map six indicators of occupational hazards for every census tract in the US. We characterized census tracts with high workplace-low SVI scores. We used natural cubic splines to examine tract level associations between the percentage of racial/ethnic minorities (individuals who are not non-Hispanic White) and the occupational indicators. Lastly, we stratified each census tract into high/low occupational noise, chemical pollutant, and disease/infection exposure to examine racial/ethnic health disparities to diabetes, asthma, and high blood pressure, respectively, as a consequence of occupational exposure inequities. Our results show that racial/ethnic minority communities, particularly those that are also low-income, experience a disproportionate burden of workplace exposures that may be contributing to racial/ethnic health disparities. When composite risk measures, such as SVI, are calculated using only information from the local residential neighborhood, they may systematically under-count occupational risks experienced by the most vulnerable communities. There is a need to consider the role of occupational justice on nationwide, racial/ethnic health disparities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:酒精相关性肝病(ALD)影响具有个体和社会特征的不同社区,这些社区可以影响结果。SocialVulnerabilityIndex(SVI)评分在0到1之间,较高的评分代表社会脆弱性风险增加。我们试图评估SVI对获得社会支持服务的ALD住院患者预后的影响。
    方法:回顾了2019年3月至8月在我们机构住院的ALD。所有患者都根据其住宅普查区分配了SVI评分。根据我们的标准做法,患者由护理协调员筛选,以确定康复咨询的需求,出院后护理协调。人口统计,肝失代偿,重症监护需要,重新接纳,和死亡率进行了比较。
    结果:在73例酒精性肝炎患者中,32具有低SVI并且42具有高SVI。非洲裔美国患者更有可能有更高的SVI(35%vs0%,p=<0.001)。基于SVI的结果没有显著差异。有393例酒精性肝硬化患者入院,其中166例SVI低,227例SVI高。非洲裔美国人(23.6%vs5.5%,p=<0.001)或禁用(41.4%vs29.5%,p=0.008)具有较高的SVI。基于SVI的结果没有显著差异。
    结论:大多数因ALD入院的患者SVI较高;然而,SVI不影响住院结局。
    BACKGROUND: Alcohol related liver disease (ALD) affects diverse communities with individual and social characteristics that can impact outcomes. The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) assigns a score between 0 and 1, where higher scores represent an increased risk of social vulnerability. We sought to assess the impact of SVI on outcomes of patients hospitalized with ALD with access to social support services.
    METHODS: Hospitalizations for ALD at our institution between March and August 2019 were reviewed. All patients were assigned an SVI score based on their residential census tract. Per our standard practice, patients were screened by care coordinators to identify needs for rehabilitation counseling, and care coordination after discharge. Demographics, hepatic decompensation, critical care needs, readmission, and mortality were compared.
    RESULTS: Among 73 patients admitted for alcoholic hepatitis, 32 had a low SVI and 42 had a high SVI. African American patients were more likely to have a higher SVI (35% vs 0%, p=<0.001). No significant difference in outcomes based on SVI was noted. There were 393 patients admitted for alcoholic cirrhosis including 166 with a low SVI and 227 with a high SVI. Patients that were African American (23.6% vs 5.5%, p=<0.001) or disabled (41.4% vs 29.5%, p=0.008) had a higher SVI. No significant difference in outcomes based on SVI was noted.
    CONCLUSIONS: Most patients admitted for ALD had a high SVI; however, SVI did not impact hospitalization outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在美国西南部,夏季野火的频率升高了环境PM2.5浓度和不良分娩结局的发生率.值得注意的是,妊娠期高血压疾病(HDP)是与孕产妇死亡率和不良分娩结局相关的重要决定因素.尽管证据越来越多,很少有研究探讨野火PM2.5的化学成分与HDP风险之间的相关性。来自国家卫生统计中心提供的数据,来自8个州>268万孕妇的单胎分娩(亚利桑那州,AZ;加州,CA,爱达荷州,ID,蒙大拿州,MT;内华达州,内华达州;俄勒冈州,或者;犹他州,UT,还有怀俄明州,WY)从2001年到2004年在美国西南部。采用时空模型和戈达德地球观测系统化学传输模型来预测总和野火PM2.5暴露的每日浓度。各种建模技术,包括未调整的分析,协变量调整模型,倾向得分匹配,和双重稳健的典型logit模型用于评估野火PM2.5暴露与妊娠期高血压和子痫之间的关系。暴露于火PM2.5,火源黑碳(BC)和有机碳(OC)与妊娠期高血压的风险增加相关(ORPM2.5=1.125,95%CI:1.109,1.141;ORBC=1.247,95%CI:1.214,1.281;OROC=1.153,95%CI:1.132,1.174)和子痫(ORPM2.5=1.217,95%CI:1.458%OR309,1.46,1.4这些关联比观察到的环境PM2.5的影响更强,其中来源主要来自城市排放。社会脆弱性指数(SVI),教育年,孕前糖尿病,和高血压作为效应调节剂。在美国西南部,妊娠暴露于野火PM2.5和特定化学成分(BC和OC)会增加妊娠高血压和子痫的风险。
    In the southwestern United States, the frequency of summer wildfires has elevated ambient PM2.5 concentrations and rates of adverse birth outcomes. Notably, hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP) constitute a significant determinant associated with maternal mortality and adverse birth outcomes. Despite the accumulating body of evidence, scant research has delved into the correlation between chemical components of wildfire PM2.5 and the risk of HDP. Derived from data provided by the National Center for Health Statistics, singleton births from >2.68 million pregnant women were selected across 8 states (Arizona, AZ; California, CA, Idaho, ID, Montana, MT; Nevada, NV; Oregon, OR; Utah, UT, and Wyoming, WY) in the southwestern US from 2001 to 2004. A spatiotemporal model and a Goddard Earth Observing System chemical transport model were employed to forecast daily concentrations of total and wildfire PM2.5-derived exposure. Various modeling techniques including unadjusted analyses, covariate-adjusted models, propensity-score matching, and double robust typical logit models were applied to assess the relationship between wildfire PM2.5 exposure and gestational hypertension and eclampsia. Exposure to fire PM2.5, fire-sourced black carbon (BC) and organic carbon (OC) were associated with an augmented risk of gestational hypertension (ORPM2.5 = 1.125, 95 % CI: 1.109,1.141; ORBC = 1.247, 95 % CI: 1.214,1.281; OROC = 1.153, 95 % CI: 1.132, 1.174) and eclampsia (ORPM2.5 = 1.217, 95 % CI: 1.145,1.293; ORBC = 1.458, 95 % CI: 1.291,1.646; OROC = 1.309, 95 % CI: 1.208,1.418) during the pregnancy exposure window with the strongest effect. The associations were stronger that the observed effects of ambient PM2.5 in which the sources primarily came from urban emissions. Social vulnerability index (SVI), education years, pre-pregnancy diabetes, and hypertension acted as effect modifiers. Gestational exposure to wildfire PM2.5 and specific chemical components (BC and OC) increased gestational hypertension and eclampsia risk in the southwestern United States.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管是美国第二大死因,由于经济不稳定和医疗保健服务有限等多种社会因素,癌症不成比例地影响服务不足的社区,导致更糟糕的生存结果。这项横断面数据库研究涉及现实世界的数据,以探索社会脆弱性指数(SVI)之间的关系,衡量社区抗灾能力,和筛查的差异,发病率,和乳房的死亡率,结直肠,还有肺癌.SVI包括四个主题:社会经济地位,家庭组成和残疾,少数民族地位和语言,和住房类型和运输。
    使用县级数据,这项研究比较了美国各县的癌症指标以及高和低SVI的影响.进行双侧统计分析以比较SVI三位数和癌症筛查,发病率,和死亡率。结果用逻辑回归分析,以确定癌症指标处于或高于中位数的SVI县的比值比。
    我们的研究涵盖了3,132个美国县。根据公开的SVI数据,我们证明了高SVI评分与低乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查率相关,以及所有三种类型癌症的高发病率和死亡率。县级SVI对癌症发病率有影响;SVI高的县乳腺癌发病率最低,而结直肠癌和肺癌的发病率在同一县最高。所有三种癌症的年龄调整后死亡率在SVI三元之间增加。风险调整后,10点SVI增加与较低的筛查和较高的死亡率相关.
    总而言之,我们的研究建立了SVI和癌症指标之间的显著相关性,强调有可能为有针对性的医疗保健计划确定具有健康差异的边缘化社区。它强调了需要进一步的纵向研究来弥合美国整体癌症护理的差距。
    UNASSIGNED: Despite being the second leading cause of death in the United States, cancer disproportionately affects underserved communities due to multiple social factors like economic instability and limited healthcare access, leading to worse survival outcomes. This cross-sectional database study involves real-world data to explore the relationship between the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), a measure of community resilience to disasters, and disparities in screening, incidence, and mortality rates of breast, colorectal, and lung cancer. The SVI encompasses four themes: socioeconomic status, household composition & disability, minority status & language, and housing type & transportation.
    UNASSIGNED: Using county-level data, this study compared cancer metrics in U.S. counties and the impact of high and low SVI. Two-sided statistical analysis was performed to compare SVI tertiles and cancer screening, incidence, and mortality rates. The outcomes were analyzed with logistic regression to determine the odds ratio of SVI counties having cancer metrics at or above the median.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study encompassed 3,132 United States counties. From publicly available SVI data, we demonstrated that high SVI scores correlate with low breast and colorectal cancer screening rates, along with high incidence and mortality rates for all three types of cancers. County level SVI has impact on incidence rates of cancers; breast cancer rates were lowest in high SVI counties, while colorectal and lung cancer rates were highest in the same counties. Age-adjusted mortality rates for all three cancers increased across SVI tertiles. After risk adjustment, a 10-point SVI increase correlated with lower screening and higher mortality rates.
    UNASSIGNED: In conclusion, our study establishes a significant correlation between SVI and cancer metrics, highlighting the potential to identify marginalized communities with health disparities for targeted healthcare initiatives. It underscores the need for further longitudinal studies on bridging the gap in overall cancer care in the United States.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:关于邻域水平的危险因素如何影响产前诊断的可能性的数据有限。可以使用社会脆弱性指数(SVI)对邻里社会脆弱性进行量化和排名,一种测量可能影响健康结果的外部压力源在当地环境中的累积效应的工具。该研究的目的是确定接受遗传咨询的孕妇SVI与产前诊断之间的关系。
    方法:对2019年1月至2022年12月在纽约两家医院接受遗传咨询的所有怀孕患者进行回顾性队列研究。对于每个病人来说,居住地址与基于人口普查区域的SVI评分(主要暴露量)相关.SVI分数被细分为五分之五,并进行了分类分析。主要结果是产前诊断(是/否)。进行多变量logistic回归。
    结果:共纳入5,935例患者进行分析,其中231例(3.9%)进行了产前诊断。关于回归分析,未观察到SVI与产前诊断之间的关联.有诊断程序的患者更有可能说英语(aOR1.80;95%CI1.13-2.87),遗传性疾病携带者(aOR1.94;95%CI1.32-2.86),NT增加(aOR6.89;95%CI3.65-13.00),异常NIPS(aOR9.58;95%CI5.81-15.80),或有胎儿结构异常(aOR10.60;95%CI6.62-16.96)。根据种族和族裔群体没有发现差异,保险类型,或婚姻状况。
    结论:SVI评分不影响产前诊断率。其他地理区域和人口的研究结果可能有所不同。
    OBJECTIVE: There are limited data on how neighborhood-level risk factors affect the likelihood of having prenatal diagnosis. Neighborhood social vulnerability can be quantified and ranked using the social vulnerability index (SVI), a tool that measures the cumulative effect of external stressors in the local environment that may affect health outcomes. The objective of the study was to determine the relationship between SVI and prenatal diagnosis among pregnant patients who received genetic counseling.
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all pregnant patients who had genetic counseling at two hospitals in New York between January 2019 and December 2022. For each patient, the address of residence was linked to an SVI score (primary exposure) based on census tract. SVI scores were subdivided into fifths and analyzed categorically. The primary outcome was prenatal diagnosis (yes/no). Multivariable logistic regression was performed.
    RESULTS: A total of 5,935 patients were included for analysis and 231 (3.9 %) had prenatal diagnosis. On regression analysis, no association between SVI and prenatal diagnosis was observed. Patients who had a diagnostic procedure were more likely to be English speaking (aOR 1.80; 95 % CI 1.13-2.87), carriers of a genetic disorder (aOR 1.94; 95 % CI 1.32-2.86), had increased NT (aOR 6.89; 95 % CI 3.65-13.00), abnormal NIPS (aOR 9.58; 95 % CI 5.81-15.80), or had fetal structural anomalies (aOR 10.60; 95 % CI 6.62-16.96). No differences were seen based on race and ethnicity group, insurance type, or marital status.
    CONCLUSIONS: SVI score does not affect rate of prenatal diagnosis. Findings may differ in other geographic regions and populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19保护行为是世界卫生组织(WHO)建议的预防COVID-19传播的关键干预措施。然而,实现遵守这一建议通常是具有挑战性的,特别是在社会弱势群体中。
    目的:我们制定了社会脆弱性指数(SVI),以预测个人遵守世卫组织关于COVID-19保护性行为建议的倾向,并确定随着Omicron在2022年1月至2022年8月期间在非洲国家和2021年8月至2022年6月期间在亚太国家的演变,社会脆弱性的变化。
    方法:在非洲国家,在第一次Omicron波期间,从14个国家(n=15,375)收集了基线数据,随访数据来自7个国家(n=7179)。在亚太国家,在第一次Omicron波之前,从14个国家(n=12,866)收集了基线数据,随访数据来自9个国家(n=8737)。从相关数据库检索国家的社会经济和健康概况。要为4个数据集中的每个数据集构建SVI,与COVID-19保护行为相关的变量被纳入使用多脉络线相关性和varimax旋转的因子分析中.对影响因素进行了基数调整,求和,和最小值-最大值从0归一化到1(最脆弱到最不脆弱)。遵守世卫组织建议的分数是使用个人自我报告的针对COVID-19的保护行为计算的。使用多元线性回归分析来评估SVI与对WHO建议的依从性评分之间的关联,以验证该指数。
    结果:在非洲,导致社会脆弱性的因素包括识字和媒体使用,对医护人员和政府的信任,国家收入和基础设施。在亚太地区,社会脆弱性是由识字决定的,国家收入和基础设施,和人口密度。该指数与非洲国家在两个时间点遵守世卫组织建议有关,但仅在亚太国家的后续行动期间。在基线,非洲国家的指数值在13个国家从0.00到0.31之间,1个国家的指数值为1.00。亚太国家的指数值在12个国家从0.00到0.23之间,2个国家的指数值为0.79和1.00。在后续阶段,7个非洲国家中的6个和2个最脆弱的亚太国家的指数值下降。两个区域最脆弱国家的指数值保持不变。
    结论:在这两个地区,在基线时观察到社会对遵守世卫组织建议的脆弱性存在显著不平等,在第一次Omicron波之后,间隙变得更大。了解影响社会对COVID-19保护性行为的脆弱性的维度可能会支持有针对性的干预措施,以增强对WHO建议的遵守,并减轻弱势群体未来大流行的影响。
    BACKGROUND: COVID-19 protective behaviors are key interventions advised by the World Health Organization (WHO) to prevent COVID-19 transmission. However, achieving compliance with this advice is often challenging, particularly among socially vulnerable groups.
    OBJECTIVE: We developed a social vulnerability index (SVI) to predict individuals\' propensity to adhere to the WHO advice on protective behaviors against COVID-19 and identify changes in social vulnerability as Omicron evolved in African countries between January 2022 and August 2022 and Asia Pacific countries between August 2021 and June 2022.
    METHODS: In African countries, baseline data were collected from 14 countries (n=15,375) during the first Omicron wave, and follow-up data were collected from 7 countries (n=7179) after the wave. In Asia Pacific countries, baseline data were collected from 14 countries (n=12,866) before the first Omicron wave, and follow-up data were collected from 9 countries (n=8737) after the wave. Countries\' socioeconomic and health profiles were retrieved from relevant databases. To construct the SVI for each of the 4 data sets, variables associated with COVID-19 protective behaviors were included in a factor analysis using polychoric correlation with varimax rotation. Influential factors were adjusted for cardinality, summed, and min-max normalized from 0 to 1 (most to least vulnerable). Scores for compliance with the WHO advice were calculated using individuals\' self-reported protective behaviors against COVID-19. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to assess the associations between the SVI and scores for compliance to WHO advice to validate the index.
    RESULTS: In Africa, factors contributing to social vulnerability included literacy and media use, trust in health care workers and government, and country income and infrastructure. In Asia Pacific, social vulnerability was determined by literacy, country income and infrastructure, and population density. The index was associated with compliance with the WHO advice in both time points in African countries but only during the follow-up period in Asia Pacific countries. At baseline, the index values in African countries ranged from 0.00 to 0.31 in 13 countries, with 1 country having an index value of 1.00. The index values in Asia Pacific countries ranged from 0.00 to 0.23 in 12 countries, with 2 countries having index values of 0.79 and 1.00. During the follow-up phase, the index values decreased in 6 of 7 African countries and the 2 most vulnerable Asia Pacific countries. The index values of the least vulnerable countries remained unchanged in both regions.
    CONCLUSIONS: In both regions, significant inequalities in social vulnerability to compliance with WHO advice were observed at baseline, and the gaps became larger after the first Omicron wave. Understanding the dimensions that influence social vulnerability to protective behaviors against COVID-19 may underpin targeted interventions to enhance compliance with WHO recommendations and mitigate the impact of future pandemics among vulnerable groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:我们探讨了社会经济地位与社会经济地位之间的关联,根据疾病控制和预防中心/有毒物质和疾病登记机构社会脆弱性指数(SVI)的评估,以及COVID-19大流行期间I级创伤中心开放性全球损伤(OGI)的特征。
    方法:回顾性回顾2017年3月至2021年3月在Harborview医疗中心接受OGI评估和修复的患者的电子病历。记录人口统计数据和患者特征。根据患者的家庭住址获得SVI。患者被分组为“历史”(前COVID)队列,包括2017年3月至2020年3月的日期,以及“COVID”队列,包括2020年3月至2021年3月的日期。
    结果:包括318例患者(77.4%为男性)。平均±S.D.年龄(岁)和SVI评分分别为44.7±22.7和0.413±0.195。与前几年相比,COVID-19大流行期间的SVI得分明显更高(更脆弱)(p=0.017),然而,当与大流行前相同患者的得分相比时,没有发现差异(p=0.609)。故意创伤和非故意创伤之间没有显着差异,工伤,OGI类型,眼内炎的存在,或眼外伤评分(p≥0.293)。尽管如此,大流行期间发生的机动车相关OGI(MVA)显著减少(p=0.041).
    结论:COVID-19大流行期间OGI患者的SVI评分较高,然而,当考虑到大流行的总体影响时,我们的发现很可能反映了整个社会的变化.对眼外伤的机制或特征没有可识别的影响,除了较少的MVA伤害。
    OBJECTIVE: We explored the associations between socioeconomic status, as evaluated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), and characteristics of open globe injury (OGI) in a Level I trauma center during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    METHODS: Retrospective review of electronic medical records of patients who underwent OGI evaluation and repair at Harborview Medical Center between March/2017 and March/2021. Demographic data and patient characteristics were recorded. The SVI was obtained based on the patient\'s home address. Patients were grouped into the \"historical\" (pre-COVID) cohort, including dates from March 2017 - March 2020, and the \"COVID\" cohort, including dates from March 2020 - March 2021.
    RESULTS: 318 patients (77.4% male) were included. Average ± S.D. age (years) and SVI scores were 44.7 ± 22.7 and 0.413 ± 0.195, respectively. SVI scores were significantly higher (more vulnerable) during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to years prior (p = 0.017), however when compared to scores for the same patients prior to the pandemic, no difference was found (p = 0.609). There was no significant difference between intentional and non-intentional trauma, work-related injuries, OGI type, presence of endophthalmitis, or ocular trauma score (p ≥ 0.293). Still, significantly fewer motor vehicle-associated (MVA) OGIs occurred during the pandemic (p = 0.041).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with OGI during the COVID-19 pandemic had higher SVI scores, however when considering the overall effect of the pandemic, our findings are likely reflective of the societal changes at large. There was no identifiable impact on the mechanisms or characteristics of ocular injuries, except for fewer MVA injuries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    社会脆弱性指数(SVI)估计社区对灾害的脆弱性,包括4个独立的领域(社会经济,家庭组成和残疾,少数民族地位和语言,以及住房和交通)。SVI与心血管疾病(CVD)的风险和结果有关。
    本范围综述探讨了SVI和CVD连续体之间的文献,目的是确定在理解SVI对CVD的影响方面的差距,并阐明未来的研究机会。
    从成立到2023年5月19日,我们系统地搜索了7个数据库,以寻找探索SVI与CVD护理连续体之间关系的文章,包括预防,诊断和患病率,治疗,和健康结果。提取的数据包括SVI排名类型,人口,结果,和研究质量。
    12项研究评估了SVI对CVD连续体的影响。五项研究探讨了死亡率结果,3项研究探讨了CVD危险因素的患病率,4项研究探讨了CVD患病率,一项研究探索了心血管疾病患者获得医疗保健的机会,1项研究探讨了心脏康复服务的使用,一项研究探索了心力衰竭的再入院率,所有这些都显示了与SVI的统计学显著关联.所有研究都包括SVI总百分位数排名,而5项研究侧重于单个主题组件。我们发现了在理解SVI对CVD护理连续体的影响方面的差距,特别是关于CVD预防和早期检测。
    这篇综述全面了解了SVI在评估CVD护理连续体各个方面的应用,并强调了未来研究的潜在途径。
    UNASSIGNED: Social vulnerability index (SVI) estimates the vulnerability of communities to disasters, encompassing 4 separate domains (socioeconomic, household composition and disability, minority status and language, and housing and transportation). The SVI has been linked with risk and outcomes of cardiovascular disease (CVD).
    UNASSIGNED: This scoping review explored the literature between the SVI and CVD continuum, with a goal to identify gaps in understanding the impact of the SVI on CVD and to elucidate future research opportunities.
    UNASSIGNED: We systematically searched 7 databases from inception to May 19, 2023, for articles that explored the relationship between the SVI and CVD care continuum, including prevention, diagnosis and prevalence, treatment, and health outcomes. Extracted data included SVI ranking type, populations, outcomes, and quality of studies.
    UNASSIGNED: Twelve studies evaluated the impact of SVI on the CVD continuum. Five studies explored mortality outcomes, 3 studies explored CVD risk factor prevalence, 4 studies explored CVD prevalence, 1 study explored access to health care in those with CVD, 1 study explored the use of cardiac rehabilitation services, and 1 study explored heart failure readmission rates, all of which revealed statistically significant associations with SVI. All studies included the SVI aggregate percentile ranking, while 5 studies focused on individual thematic components. We identified gaps in understanding the SVI\'s impact on CVD care continuum, particularly regarding CVD prevention and early detection.
    UNASSIGNED: This review provides a comprehensive understanding of the SVI\'s application in assessing various aspects of the CVD care continuum and highlights potential avenues for future research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究分析了在COVID-19大流行之前和期间,伊利诺伊州青年急诊室或住院患者因抑郁或焦虑而就诊的轨迹。
    方法:我们分析急诊科(ED)门诊就诊情况,直接录取,2016年至2023年6月,年龄在5-19岁的患者因抑郁或焦虑障碍而入院,数据来自伊利诺伊州医院协会COMPdata数据库.我们根据患者的社会人口统计学和临床特征分析就诊率的变化,医院数量和类型,和人口普查邮政编码衡量贫困和社会脆弱性。中断时间序列分析用于检验大流行前51个月和大流行期间39个月之间水平和趋势差异的显著性。
    结果:伊利诺伊州232家医院有250,648次就诊。在大流行立即减少后,估计每月-12.0(p=0.003,95%CI-19.8-4.1)男性就诊减少,而-13.1(p=0.07,95%CI-27-1)在大流行期间,女性就诊相对于大流行前的每月减少。门诊急诊就诊的减少最大,对于男性来说,对于5-9岁和15-19岁的患者,对于较小的社区医院,以及来自最贫穷和最脆弱的邮政编码地区的患者。
    结论:大流行关闭后,llinois青年抑郁和焦虑住院率显著下降,并在2023年保持稳定,低于2016-2019年的水平。进一步的进展将需要临床创新和有效的预防,以更好地了解青年心理健康的文化根源为基础。
    OBJECTIVE: This study analyzes the trajectory of youth emergency room or inpatient hospital visits for depression or anxiety in Illinois before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    METHODS: We analyze emergency department (ED) outpatient visits, direct admissions, and ED admissions by patients ages 5-19 years coded for depression or anxiety disorders from 2016 through June 2023 with data from the Illinois Hospital Association COMPdata database. We analyze changes in visit rates by patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, hospital volume and type, and census zip code measures of poverty and social vulnerability. Interrupted times series analysis was used to test the significance of differences in level and trends between 51 pre-pandemic months and 39 during-pandemic months.
    RESULTS: There were 250,648 visits to 232 Illinois hospitals. After large immediate pandemic decreases there was an estimated -12.0 per-month (p = 0.003, 95% CI -19.8-4.1) decrease in male visits and a - 13.1 (p = 0.07, 95% CI -27 -1) per-month decrease in female visits in the during-pandemic relative to the pre-pandemic period. The reduction was greatest for outpatient ED visits, for males, for age 5-9 and 15-19 years patients, for smaller community hospitals, and for patients from the poorest and most vulnerable zip code areas.
    CONCLUSIONS: llinois youth depression and anxiety hospital visit rates declined significantly after the pandemic shutdown and remained stable into 2023 at levels below 2016-2019 rates. Further progress will require both clinical innovations and effective prevention grounded in a better understanding of the cultural roots of youth mental health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在接受药物诱导的睡眠内窥镜检查(DISE)的患者中,研究社区水平的社会脆弱性与阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)严重程度之间的关系。
    方法:单中心回顾性队列研究。
    方法:我们对2016年7月至2022年7月接受DISE的18岁以上患者进行了回顾性图表回顾。患者地址用地理信息系统进行了地理编码,和空间叠加被用来在四个子主题中分配人口普查区级别的社会脆弱性指数(SVI)分数:社会经济(主题1),家庭组成/残疾(主题2),少数民族地位/语言(主题3),和住房/交通(主题4)。
    结果:该研究包括165例患者(61.2岁±11.6;31.0BMI±6.1,男性102,63女)。13例患者出现轻度OSA;55例患者出现中度OSA;97例患者出现重度OSA。少数民族地位和语言的SVI值较高,在多变量模型中,较高的BMI都预测呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)增加(分别为p=0.042和<0.001);然而,种族,年龄,性别,或其他三个SVI子主题值不可预测。
    结论:居住在社会脆弱性较高地区的成年人-特别是少数族裔或英语作为第二语言-肥胖患者更有可能患有更严重的OSA。没有相关性,然而,肥胖和居住在高SVI地区之间。这些结果表明,邻里状况和肥胖都与OSA严重程度相关。这种升高的风险对诊断测试有潜在的影响,临床随访,筛选,以及居住在被剥夺权利社区的成年人的治疗计划。
    方法:IV.
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between neighborhood-level social vulnerability on the severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients undergoing drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).
    METHODS: Single center retrospective cohort study.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients >18 years of age that underwent DISE from July 2016 to July 2022. Patient addresses were geocoded with geographic information systems, and spatial overlays were used to assign census-tract level social vulnerability index (SVI) scores in the four sub-themes: Socioeconomic (theme 1), Household Composition/Disability (theme 2), Minority Status/Language (theme 3), and Housing/Transportation (theme 4).
    RESULTS: The study included 165 patients (61.2 years ± 11.6; 31.0 BMI ± 6.1, 102 male, 63 female). Mild OSA was present in13 patients; 55 patients had moderate OSA; and 97 patients had severe OSA. A higher SVI value in minority status and language, and a higher BMI both predicted an increased Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) (p = 0.042, and <0.001, respectively) in the multivariate model; whereas, race, age, gender, or the other three SVI sub-theme values were not predictive.
    CONCLUSIONS: Adults residing in areas of greater social vulnerability - specifically a larger minority presence or English as a second language - and patients who are obese are more likely to have more severe OSA. There was no correlation, however, between obesity and residence in an area of high SVI. These results suggest that both neighborhood conditions and obesity are associated with OSA severity. This elevated risk has potential implications for diagnostic testing, clinic follow-ups, screening, and treatment plans for adults residing in disenfranchised neighborhoods.
    METHODS: IV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号