暂无摘要。

This paper presents a software architecture to implement a task-motion planning system that can improve human-robot interactions by including social behavior when social robots provide services related to object manipulation to users. The proposed system incorporates four main modules: knowledge reasoning, perception, task planning, and motion planning for autonomous service. This system adds constraints to the robot motions based on the recognition of the object affordance from the perception module and environment states from the knowledge reasoning module. Thus, the system performs task planning by adjusting the goal of the task to be performed, and motion planning based on the functional aspects of the object, enabling the robot to execute actions consistent with social behavior to respond to the user\'s intent and the task environment. The system is verified through simulated experiments consisting of several object manipulation services such as handover and delivery. The results show that, by using the proposed system, the robot can provide different services depending on the situation, even if it performs the same tasks. In addition, the system demonstrates a modular structure that enables the expansion of the available services by defining additional actions and diverse planning modules.

OBJECTIVE: Previous researches suggest that social robots can facilitate the learning of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) by enhancing their interests, engagement, and attention. However, there is limited understanding regarding whether children with ASD can learn directly from the testimony of social robots and whether they can remain vigilant based on the perceived accuracy of these robots. Therefore, the present study was conducted to examine whether children with ASD demonstrated selective trust towards social robots.
METHODS: Twenty-nine children with ASD between ages of 4-7 years, and 38 typically-developing (TD) age and IQ-matched peers participated in classic selective trust tasks. During the tasks, they learned the names of novel objects from either a pair of social robots or a pair of human informants, where one informant had previously been established as accurate and the other inaccurate.
RESULTS: Children with ASD trusted information from an accurate social robot over an inaccurate one, similar to their performance with human informants. However, compared to TD children, children with ASD exhibited lower levels of selective trust regardless of the type of informants they learned from.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that children with ASD can selectively trust and acquire knowledge from social robots, shedding light on the potential use of social robots in supporting individuals with ASD.

Healthy aging requires the maintenance of good physical and cognitive activity. However, as they age, older adults often experience a decline in physical and cognitive activity, leading to a more sedentary lifestyle. Some older adults may not have a choice but to become increasingly sedentary as they age due to injury or deteriorated physicality. As such, they require assistive technologies to aid in their daily lives and activities to maintain healthy cognitive function. Social Robots are a newer form of assistive technology, specifically designed for social interactions and gameplay. As with other assistive technologies, compliance barriers to their acceptance and use for meaningful, seated activities among older adults are expected. To better explore this phenomenon, improve quality of life and understand what drives older adults to accept and use newer forms of technology like social robots, this conceptual paper conjoins two theoretical frameworks: The Activity Theory of Aging (ATA) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). As social robots hold great promise for improving the quality of life for older adults, exploring what driving factors could enable their greater acceptance and use is essential to furthering this field of study within Australia.

BACKGROUND: Loneliness is a serious public health concern. Although previous interventions have had some success in mitigating loneliness, the field is in search of novel, more effective, and more scalable solutions. Here, we focus on \"relational agents\", a form of software agents that are increasingly powered by artificial intelligence and large language models (LLMs). We report on a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of relational agents on loneliness across age groups.
METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched 11 databases including Ovid MEDLINE and Embase from inception to Sep 16, 2022. We included randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies of interventions published in English across all age groups. These loneliness interventions, typically attempt to improve social skills, social support, social interaction, and maladaptive cognitions. Peer-reviewed journal articles, books, book chapters, Master\'s and PhD theses, or conference papers were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias via the RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. We calculated pooled estimates of Hedge\'s g in a random-effects meta-analysis and conducted sensitivity and sub-group analyses. We evaluated publication bias via funnel plots, Egger\'s test, and a trim-and-fill algorithm.
RESULTS: Our search identified 3,935 records of which 14 met eligibility criteria and were included in our meta-analysis. Included studies comprised 286 participants with individual study sample sizes ranging from 4 to 42 participants (x̄ = 20.43, s = 11.58, x̃ = 20). We used a Bonferroni correction with αBonferroni = 0.05 / 4 = 0.0125 and applied Knapp-Hartung adjustments. Relational agents reduced loneliness significantly at an adjusted αBonferroni (g = -0.552; 95% Knapp-Hartung CI, -0.877 to -0.226; P = 0.003), which corresponds to a moderate reduction in loneliness.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results are currently the most comprehensive of their kind and provide promising evidence for the efficacy of relational agents. Relational agents are a promising technology that can alleviate loneliness in a scalable way and that can be a meaningful complement to other approaches. The advent of LLMs should boost their efficacy, and further research is needed to explore the optimal design and use of relational agents. Future research could also address shortcomings of current results, such as small sample sizes and high risk of bias. Particularly young audiences have been overlooked in past research.

Social technology can improve the quality of social lives of older adults (OAs) and mitigate negative mental and physical health outcomes. When people engage with technology, they can do so to stimulate social interaction (stimulation hypothesis) or disengage from their real world (disengagement hypothesis), according to Nowland et al.\'s model of the relationship between social Internet use and loneliness. External events, such as large periods of social isolation like during the COVID-19 pandemic, can also affect whether people use technology in line with the stimulation or disengagement hypothesis. We examined how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the social challenges OAs faced and their expectations for robot technology to solve their challenges. We conducted two participatory design (PD) workshops with OAs during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, OAs\' primary concern was distanced communication with family members, with a prevalent desire to assist them through technology. They also wanted to share experiences socially, as such OA\'s attitude toward technology could be explained mostly by the stimulation hypothesis. However, after COVID-19 the pandemic, their focus shifted towards their own wellbeing. Social isolation and loneliness were already significant issues for OAs, and these were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, such OAs\' attitudes toward technology after the pandemic could be explained mostly by the disengagement hypothesis. This clearly reflect the OA\'s current situation that they have been getting further digitally excluded due to rapid technological development during the pandemic. Both during and after the pandemic, OAs found it important to have technologies that were easy to use, which would reduce their digital exclusion. After the pandemic, we found this especially in relation to newly developed technologies meant to help people keep at a distance. To effectively integrate these technologies and avoid excluding large parts of the population, society must address the social challenges faced by OAs.

This paper explores the ways in which health care professionals, family carers, and older persons expressed attitudes and opinions on using Paro, a social robot designed to stimulate patients with dementia. Thereafter, we critically evaluate existing prejudicial views toward Paro users to provide recommendations for its future use. Using an exploratory qualitative interview method, we recruited a total of 67 participants in Switzerland. They included 23 care professionals, 17 family carers, and 27 older persons. Data obtained were analyzed thematically. Study findings present general agreement that Paro is an appealing and beneficial social robot, but it is not a tool that everyone feels comfortable with. Because it is perceived as \"child play,\" it would be demeaning for competent adults to play with such things. Consequently, Paro is appropriate only for persons with dementia. These findings brought forth ethical concerns about deception, infantilization, and respecting older persons\' dignity. The idea of who is an appropriate Paro user led to our discussions on predicting future Paro users. The meaning of using social robotics in nursing homes can be conditioned by a rigid interpretation of adulthood and playful behavior. To protect future selves when one is living with dementia from prejudices, it may be useful for older persons and their loved ones to plan their future care situations to ensure that they are treated in accordance with their delineated decisions.

Reminding is often identified as a central function of socially assistive robots in the healthcare sector. The robotic reminders are supposed to help people with memory impairments to remember to take their medicine, to drink and eat, or to attend appointments. Such standalone reminding technologies can, however, be too demanding for people with memory injuries. In a co-creation process, we developed an individual reminder robot together with a person with traumatic brain injury and her care personnel. During this process, we learned that while current research describe reminding as a prototypical task for socially assistive robots, there is no clear definition of what constitutes a reminder nor that it is based on complex sequences of interactions that evolve over time and space, across different actions, actors and technologies. Based on our data from the co-creation process and the first deployment, we argue for a shift towards a sequential and socially distributed character of reminding. Understanding socially assistive robots as rehabilitative tools for people with memory impairment, they need to be reconsidered as interconnected elements in institutional care practices instead of isolated events for the remindee.

A magician\'s trick and a chatbot conversation have something in common: most of their audiences do not know how they work. Both are also constrained by their own limitations: magicians by the constraints of biology and physics, and dialogue systems by the status of current technology. Magicians and chatbot creators also share a goal: they want to engage their audience. But magicians, unlike the designers of dialogue systems, have centuries of practice in gracefully skirting limitations in order to engage their audience and enhance a sense of awe. In this paper, we look at these practices and identify several key principles of magic and psychology to apply to conversations between chatbots and humans. We formulate a model of communication centered on controlling the user\'s attention, expectations, decisions, and memory based on examples from the history of magic. We apply these magic principles to real-world conversations between humans and a social robot and evaluate their effectiveness in a Magical conversation setting compared to a Control conversation that does not incorporate magic principles. We find that human evaluators preferred interactions that incorporated magical principles over interactions that did not. In particular, magical interactions increased 1) the personalization of experience, 2) user engagement, and 3) character likability. Firstly, the magical experience was \"personalized.\" According to survey results, the magical conversation demonstrated a statistically significant increase in \"emotional connection\" and \"robot familiarity.\" Therefore, the personalization of the experience leads to higher levels of perceived impressiveness and emotional connection. Secondly, in the Magical conversation, we find that the human interlocutor is perceived to have statistically-significantly higher engagement levels in four of seven characteristics. Thirdly, participants judged the robot in the magical conversation to have a significantly greater degree of \"energeticness,\"\"humorousness,\" and \"interestingness.\" Finally, evaluation of the conversations with questions intended to measure contribution of the magical principals showed statistically-significant differences for five out of nine principles, indicating a positive contribution of the magical principles to the perceived conversation experience. Overall, our evaluation demonstrates that the psychological principles underlying a magician\'s showmanship can be applied to the design of conversational systems to achieve more personalized, engaging, and fun interactions.

Introduction: Older adults are engaging more and more with voice-based agent and social robot technologies, and roboticists are increasingly designing interactions for these systems with older adults in mind. Older adults are often not included in these design processes, yet there are many opportunities for older adults to collaborate with design teams to design future robot interactions and help guide directions for robot development. Methods: Through a year-long co-design project, we collaborated with 28 older adults to understand the key focus areas that older adults see promise in for older adult-robot interaction in their everyday lives and how they would like these interactions to be designed. This paper describes and explores the robot-interaction guidelines and future directions identified by older adults, specifically investigating the change and trajectory of these guidelines through the course of the co-design process from the initial interview to the design guideline generation session to the final interview. Results were analyzed through an adapted ethnographic decision tree modeling approach to understand older adults\' decision making surrounding the various focus areas and guidelines for social robots. Results: Overall, over the course of the co-design process between the beginning and end, older adults developed a better understanding of the robot that translated to them being more certain of their attitudes of how they would like a robot to engage with them in their lives. Older adults were more accepting of transactional functions such as reminders and scheduling and less open to functions that would involve sharing sensitive information and tracking and/or monitoring of them, expressing concerns around surveillance. There was some promise in robot interactions for connecting with others, body signal monitoring, and emotional wellness, though older adults brought up concerns around autonomy, privacy, and naturalness of the interaction with a robot that need to be further explored. Discussion: This work provides guidance for future interaction development for robots that are being designed to interact with older adults and highlights areas that need to be further investigated with older adults to understand how best to design for user concerns.