BACKGROUND: Both small-cell carcinoma (SCLC) and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung are often clinically dealt with as being in the same category as neuroendocrine carcinoma, and their clinical differences have not been adequately assessed.
METHODS: The postoperative prognosis was retrospectively analyzed using the data of 196 patients who underwent resection for SCLC or LCNEC.
RESULTS: Of the patients included, 99 (50.5%) had SCLC and 97 (49.5%) had LCNEC. The median duration of follow-up was 39 months (interquartile range [IQR] 21-76) and 56 months (IQR 21-87) for SCLC and LCNEC, respectively. The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) probabilities were 53.7% and 62.7% (p = 0.133) for patients with SCLC and LCNEC, respectively. In the SCLC group, a multivariate analysis showed that adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.99, p = 0.04) was the only factor that was significantly associated with OS. In the LCNEC group, univariate analyses demonstrated that pathologic stage I (p = 0.01) was the only factor that was associated with better OS after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: We found different clinical features in SCLC and LCNEC; in patients with SCLC, because OS could be expected to significantly improve with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, patients with resected SCLC of any pathologic stage should receive adjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with LCNEC, because pathologic stage I LCNEC is related to better prognosis than any other stages, a thorough clinical staging, including invasive staging, according to present guidelines should be performed to identify clinical stage I LCNEC with the highest certainty.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study is to examine the predictive factors for cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients diagnosed with Small-Cell Carcinoma of the Prostate (SCCP) and to construct a prognostic model.
UNASSIGNED: Cases were selected using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to calculate survival rates, while Lasso and Cox regression were employed to analyze prognostic factors. An independent prognostic factor-based nomogram was created to forecast CSS at 12 and 24 months. The model\'s predictive efficacy was assessed using the consistency index (C-index), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) in separate tests.
UNASSIGNED: Following the analysis of Cox and Lasso regression, age, race, Summary stage, and chemotherapy were determined to be significant risk factors (P < 0.05). In the group of participants who received training, the rate of 12-month CSS was 44.6%, the rate of 24-month CSS was 25.5%, and the median time for CSS was 10.5 months. The C-index for the training cohort was 0.7688 ± 0.024. As for the validation cohort, it was 0.661 ± 0.041. According to the nomogram, CSS was accurately predicted and demonstrated consistent and satisfactory predictive performance at both 12 months (87.3% compared to 71.2%) and 24 months (80.4% compared to 71.7%). As shown in the external validation calibration plot, the AUC for 12- and 24-month is 64.6% vs. 56.9% and 87.0% vs. 70.7%, respectively. Based on the calibration plot of the CSS nomogram at both the 12-month and 24-month marks, it can be observed that both the actual values and the nomogram predictions indicate a predominantly stable CSS. When compared to the AJCC staging system, DCA demonstrated a higher level of accuracy in predicting CSS through the use of a nomogram.
UNASSIGNED: Clinical prognostic factors can be utilized with nomograms to forecast CSS in Small-Cell Carcinoma of the Prostate (SCCP).

A case of a man with the recent onset of painful bilateral firm gynecomastia is reported. Mammography confirmed increased breast density. Biopsy characterized both masses as metastases of a small-cell lung tumor. This case highlights the atypical presentation and complements the literature regarding the rarity of breast metastases from small-cell lung cancer in men. Teaching point: Bilateral gynecomastia in a man with a long history of cigarette smoking should be considered with caution.

Based on lineage-specific transcription factors, small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SmCC) of the urinary bladder has recently been subtyped into three molecular subtypes: ASCL1, NEUROD1 and POU2F3. The latter is a master transcriptional regulator of tuft cells (TCs) which are rare solitary cells found in various mucosal epithelia such as the gastrointestinal tract, but which have not been reported in the bladder. The POU2F3 subtype shows low or absent neuroendocrine marker expression. A case of mixed SmCC and conventional-type urothelial carcinoma (CUC) of the urinary bladder with POU2F3-expressing intraepithelial small-cell carcinoma in keeping with a tuft cell phenotype, arising in association with intestinal metaplasia (IM) is described. The presence of POU2F3-expressing cells in normal urothelium, cystitis cystica glandularis and IM of the urinary bladder is demonstrated in separate cases of cystitis cystica glandularis with IM. Also, POU2F3 expression is identified in a subset of bladder SmCC.

Small-cell carcinoma (SCC) of the gallbladder is a rare and distinctive clinicopathological entity, characterized by its aggressive nature with early metastasis and a poor prognosis. We present a rare case of a 53-year-old female who came with a perforated gall bladder and was later diagnosed with SCC. This report details how the patient was managed preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. The patient is under follow-up and has survived so far with subsequent chemotherapy.

A 66-year-old male was diagnosed with cT4N0M1b small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the prostate. Four months after the administration of combined androgen blockade, multiple novel metastatic regions in the lung and liver and progression of bone metastasis were observed. The patient was referred to our hospital because of biochemical and radiographic progression after four cycles of docetaxel as a first-line therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Transurethral resection of the prostate and hepatic biopsy revealed small-cell carcinoma with positive expression of neuroendocrine markers. The FoundationOne CDx next-generation sequencing test revealed several pathogenic variants, including BRCA2 (W1692fs*3), KEAP1 (R320W), and TP53 (C2385) mutation. After four cycles of chemotherapy with carboplatin plus etoposide (CE), the metastatic regions regressed markedly. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) level decreased by 96.9% and 91.6%, respectively. However, 2 months after the completion of four cycles of CE, elevation of tumor marker levels, and re-growth of the metastatic regions were observed. Although olaparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi), achieved a 45.2% decrease in NSE, the patient rejected to continue therapy because of G2 adverse events. After receiving an additional two cycles of CE and one cycle of cabazitaxel, the patient died because of cancer progression 24 months after the initial treatment for prostate cancer. Here, we present a case of BRCA2-altered small-cell neuroendocrine prostate cancer treated with both platinum-containing chemotherapy and PARPi. Both therapies achieved an initial response; however, durable responses were not obtained. Additional discussion regarding the optimal treatment strategy for BRCA-altered small-cell/neuroendocrine prostate cancer is required.

OBJECTIVE: There is no conclusive data on the prognosis of patients who receive paclitaxel-carboplatin (TC) plus bevacizumab therapy for advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the uterine cervix, a rare histological subtype of cervical cancer. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of TC chemotherapy plus bevacizumab and bevacizumab single maintenance therapy for advanced NEC of the cervix.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients who received TC plus bevacizumab therapy for metastatic, recurrent, or persistent NEC of the cervix at seven institutions between 2015 and 2020. Relevant data were extracted from the patients\' medical records and analyzed.
RESULTS: Seven patients, including six with small-cell NEC and one with large-cell NEC, were included for analysis. Three patients received bevacizumab single maintenance therapy following TC plus bevacizumab therapy, whereas four patients did not receive bevacizumab single maintenance therapy. The median overall survival and progression-free survival of the patients who received bevacizumab single maintenance therapy were longer than those of the patients who did not receive the therapy (34 months vs. 10.5 months and 19 months vs. 5 months, respectively). However, the patients who received bevacizumab single maintenance therapy had received cisplatin-based chemotherapy previously.
CONCLUSIONS: On the premise that cisplatin-based chemotherapy is administered as the first-line treatment for advanced NEC of the cervix, bevacizumab single maintenance therapy following TC plus bevacizumab may be considered the second- or third-line treatment. However, the risk of adverse events, such as intestinal perforation, should be discussed with patients.

This article was co-authored by a patient\'s relative describing their experiences of receiving a diagnosis and subsequent clinical management of a rare form of prostate cancer, neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). The difficulty of receiving this diagnosis, particularly as this was terminal with no options for systemic treatment, and experiences throughout this process are detailed. The relative\'s questions regarding the care of her partner, NEPC and clinical management are answered. The treating physician\'s perspective regarding clinical management is enclosed. Prostate cancer remains one of the most common cancer diagnoses, with small-cell carcinoma (SCC) of the prostate representing 0.5-2% of these. Prostatic SCC frequently develops in patients previously treated for prostate adenocarcinoma, more rarely arising de novo. Diagnosis and management present clinical challenges owing to its rarity, frequently aggressive disease course, lack of specific diagnostic and monitoring biomarkers, and treatment limitations. Current pathophysiological understanding of prostatic SCC, genomics and contemporary and evolving treatment options in addition to current guidelines are discussed. Written principally from the patient\'s relatives and physician experience with discussion of current evidence, diagnostic and treatment options, we hope this piece is informative for both patients and healthcare professionals alike.

OBJECTIVE: This study retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with histologically diagnosed treatment-related pure small-cell neuroendocrine prostate cancer.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data for 13 patients with treatment-related neuroendocrine prostate cancer who were diagnosed between May 2015 and February 2022. Standardized systemic therapies of etoposide plus cisplatin (or carboplatin), amrubicin and nogitecan were selected as sequential treatments. Cancer-specific survival and progression-free survival were evaluated as the primary endpoint. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the relationships between treatment regimens, clinical variables, cancer-specific survival and progression-free survival.
RESULTS: The median cancer-specific survival after diagnosis for all patients was 22.4 months (range 1.3-33.4 months). The median progression-free survival was 9.3 months after first-line etoposide plus cisplatin (or carboplatin) treatment (n = 13); 4.2 months after second-line amrubicin treatment (n = 4); and >15 months after third-line nogitecan treatment (n = 2). The median progression-free survival after first-line chemotherapy of the liver metastasis (-) group was 10.2 months, and that of the (+) group was 5.3 months (P = 0.015, hazard ratio = 11.6, 95% confidence interval = 1.01 - 133.7). No clinicopathological parameters were identified as significant independent predictors of cancer-specific survival in univariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Sequential chemotherapy with etoposide plus cisplatin (or carboplatin), amrubicin and nogitecan may be helpful for patients with treatment-related pure small-cell neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Early biopsy of metastases and initiation of effective therapy is essential for patients with progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer and low prostate-specific antigen.

Recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer has a very poor prognosis and limited active treatment options.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the 3-drug regimen of topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer.
This retrospective cohort study used data from the Neuroendocrine Cervical Tumor Registry (NeCTuR), which include data abstracted directly from medical records of women diagnosed with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix from English- and Spanish-speaking countries. The study compared women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer who received the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen as first- or second-line therapy for recurrence and women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer who received chemotherapy but not the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen. Patients continued chemotherapy until disease progression or the development of unacceptable toxic effects. Progression-free survival from the start of therapy for recurrence to the next recurrence or death, overall survival from the first recurrence, and response rates were evaluated.
The study included 62 patients who received the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen as first- or second-line therapy for recurrence and 56 patients who received chemotherapy but not the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen for recurrence. The median progression-free survival rates were 8.7 months in the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group and 3.7 months in the non-topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, with a hazard ratio for disease progression of 0.27 (95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.48; P<.0001). In the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, 15% of patients had stable disease, 39% of patients had a partial response, and 18% of patients had a complete response. Compared with patients in the non-topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, significantly more patients in the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group remained on treatment at 6 months (31% vs 67%, respectively; P=.0004) and 1 year (9% vs 24%, respectively; P=.02). The median overall survival rates were 16.8 months in the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group and 14.0 months in the non-topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, with a hazard ratio for death of 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.37).
Combination therapy with topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab was an active regimen in women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer and improved progression-free survival while decreasing the hazard ratio for disease progression.