BACKGROUND: The transition from fingolimod (FIN) to siponimod (SIP) for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) treatment in the occurrence of Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (SPMS) diagnosis has increasingly attracted considerable interest in the recent literature.
METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a direct switch from FIN to SIP in nine MS patients who had switched directly from FIN to SIP due to SPMS diagnosis at the Multiple Sclerosis Center of the University Hospital Policlinico of Bari.
CONCLUSIONS: Real-world results from our cohort demonstrated that the direct switch from FIN to SIP in patients transitioning in SP course is associated with clinical and disability progression stability, with a favorable safety profile.

UNASSIGNED: This case report highlights the importance of monitoring ocular health for patients starting on siponimod treatment, a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator, for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. By showing how medication adverse events present in patients, we can revisit the current guidelines on ophthalmic evaluation recommendations.
UNASSIGNED: We report a 60-year-old patient who presented with unilateral blurry vision upon initiating siponimod therapy for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Her exam findings did not show visual field defects but were significant for cystoid macular edema distorting the foveal contour. Upon stopping siponimod therapy, the patient\'s macular edema and symptoms resolved significantly within 7 days and completely resolved 1 month later.
UNASSIGNED: This case showcases siponimod-associated cystoid macular edema in a patient without known risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus and uveitis. The patient also had the earliest reported symptom onset to date following the initiation of siponimod therapy. Current recommendations from the American Academy of Ophthalmology and FDA stress the importance of ophthalmic evaluation three to four months after treatment initiation for patients with a history of risk factors. Given our current case and its comparison with four previously reported cases, we recommend that physicians inform patients of possible ocular adverse events with siponimod therapy regardless of their past medical history and duration of treatment.

Alemtuzumab, a humanized anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, is approved for treatment of highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) but requires vigilant post-treatment monitoring due to associated risks. The prescription of subsequent therapies following Alemtuzumab, as mandated by label guidance for a treatment-free period of at least 5 years, presents a complex challenge, particularly if there is concurrent conversion to secondary progressive disease course. We described a case-series of five patients starting therapy with Siponimod and followed up for 12 months period converted to secondary progressive MS previously exposed to Alemtuzumab. All patients received Siponimod 2 mg. Clinical evaluation measured with Expanded Disability Status Scale and cognitive evaluation measured with Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis were stable after 12 months on therapy. No severe lymphopenia was recorded, nor serious adverse events. In conclusion, the long-term management of patients treated with Alemtuzumab transitioning to secondary progressive MS requires a proactive and multidisciplinary approach. By addressing the challenges associated with treatment limitations and short-term monitoring recommendations while considering alternative therapeutic options like Siponimod, clinicians can optimize outcomes and ensure continuity of care for individuals with MS.

So far, only a small number of medications are effective in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). The sphingosine-1-phosphate-receptor (S1PR)-1,5 modulator siponimod, licensed for progressive MS, is acting both on peripheral immune cells and in the central nervous system (CNS). So far it remains elusive, whether those effects are related to the neurotrophin brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). We hypothesized that BDNF in immune cells might be a prerequisite to reduce disease activity in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and prevent neurotoxicity. MOG35-55 immunized wild type (WT) and BDNF knock-out (BDNFko) mice were treated with siponimod or vehicle and scored daily in a blinded manner. Immune cell phenotyping was performed via flow cytometry. Immune cell infiltration and demyelination of spinal cord were assessed using immunohistochemistry. In vitro, effects on neurotoxicity and mRNA regulation were investigated using dorsal root ganglion cells incubated with EAE splenocyte supernatant. Siponimod led to a dose-dependent reduction of EAE scores in chronic WT EAE. Using a suboptimal dosage of 0.45 µg/day, siponimod reduced clinical signs of EAE independent of BDNF-expression in immune cells in accordance with reduced infiltration and demyelination. Th and Tc cells in secondary lymphoid organs were dose-dependently reduced, paralleled with an increase of regulatory T cells. In vitro, neuronal viability trended towards a deterioration after incubation with EAE supernatant; siponimod showed a slight rescue effect following treatment of WT splenocytes. Neuronal gene expression for CCL2 and CX3CL1 was elevated after incubation with EAE supernatant, which was reversed after siponimod treatment for WT, but not for BNDFko. Apoptosis markers and alternative death pathways were not affected. Siponimod exerts both anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects, partially related to BDNF-expression. This might in part explain effectiveness during progression in MS and could be a target for therapy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether switching disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) from sphingosine-1 phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators to either natalizumab (NTZ) or dimethyl fumarate (DMF) could restore the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).
METHODS: This study included 9 controls and 33 patients with MS: 7 patients treated with DMF, 7 patients treated with NTZ, 9 patients treated with S1P receptor modulators, and 10 patients who had switched DMTs from S1P receptor modulators to DMF or NTZ by the second vaccine dose. The patients who had switched DMTs were classified into two groups, based on whether their lymphocyte counts were above or below 1000/μL at the time of vaccination. In addition, relapses within 6 months after switching DMTs were also evaluated in these patients. Six months after the second dose of the vaccination, anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies were evaluated in all participants, and spike specific CD4+ T cells were also assessed in patients who had switched DMTs from S1P receptor modulators.
RESULTS: Patients treated with S1P receptor modulators had lower levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies than the controls and patients treated with DMF and NTZ. On the other hand, in patients who had switched DMTs from S1P receptor modulators, a recovery of lymphocyte counts above 1000/µL resulted in restored humoral and cellular immune responses to the vaccination. There were no neurological relapses in patients who had switched DMTs from S1P receptor modulators to NTZ.
CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination is expected to be effective in patients whose lymphocyte counts have recovered due to switching DMTs from S1P receptor modulators. Switching DMTs from S1P receptor modulators to NTZ before vaccination may be beneficial in achieving efficacy for SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, with a reduced risk of relapse.

Osteoporosis is the most common bone disorder, in which an imbalance between osteoclastic bone resorption and osteoblastic bone formation disrupts bone homeostasis. Osteoporosis management using anti-osteoclastic agents is a promising strategy; however, this remains an unmet need. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) and its receptors (S1PRs) are essential for maintaining bone homeostasis. Here, we identified that Siponimod, a Food and Drug Administration-approved S1PR antagonist for the treatment of multiple sclerosis, shows promising therapeutic effects against osteoporosis by inhibiting osteoclast formation and function. We found that Siponimod inhibited osteoclast formation in a dose-dependent manner without causing cytotoxicity. Podosome belt staining and bone resorption assays indicated that Siponimod treatment impaired osteoclast function. Western blot and qPCR assays demonstrated that Siponimod suppressed the expression of osteoclast-specific markers, including C-Fos, Nftac1, and Ctsk. Mechanistically, we validated that Siponimod downregulated receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL)-induced Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathways during osteoclastogenesis. Moreover, in a preclinical mouse model, Siponimod prevented ovariectomy-induced bone loss by suppressing osteoclast activity in vivo. Collectively, these results suggest that Siponimod could serve as an alternative therapeutic agent for the treatment of osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND: Circulating immune cells play a pathogenic role in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the role of specific lymphocyte subpopulations is not unveiled yet, especially in progressive stages. We aimed to investigate lymphocyte changes during siponimod treatment in active secondary progressive MS (aSPMS) and their associations with clinical outcomes.
METHODS: We enrolled 46 aSPMS patients starting on siponimod treatment with at least 6 months of follow-up and two visits within the scheduled timeframes and 14 sex- and age-matched healthy controls (HCs). Clinical and laboratory data were collected retrospectively at baseline, 3rd, 6th, 12th, and 24th month for MS patients, and at baseline for HCs.
RESULTS: At baseline SPMS patients presented with increased naïve regulatory T lymphocytes (p = 0.02) vs. HCs. Over time, SPMS patients showed decreased T CD4+ (coeff. range = -24/-17, 95% CI range = -31.60 to -10.40), B lymphocyte (coeff. range = -3.77/-2.54, 95% CI range = -6.02 to -0.35), memory regulatory B cells (coeff. range = -0.78/-0.57, 95% CI range = -1.24 to -0.17) and CD4/CD8 ratio (coeff. range = -4.44/-0.67, 95% CI range = -1.61 to -0.17) from month 3 thereafter vs. baseline, and reduced CD3+CD20+ lymphocytes from month 12 thereafter (coeff. range = -0.32/-0.24, 95% CI range = -0.59 to -0.03). Patients not experiencing disability progression while on siponimod treatment showed B lymphocyte reduction from month 3 (coeff. range = -4.23/-2.32, 95% CI range = -7.53 to -0.15) and CD3+CD20+ lymphocyte reduction from month 12 (coeff. range = -0.32/-0.24, 95% CI range = -0.59 to -0.03) vs. patients experiencing progression.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with siponimod showed a T and B lymphocyte reduction, especially CD4+, CD3+CD20+ and naïve regulatory T cells and memory regulatory B cells. Disability progression while on siponimod treatment was associated with a less pronounced effect on B and CD3+CD20+ lymphocytes.

UNASSIGNED: Siponimod-related lymphopenia in real-world clinical practice has implications for dose adjustment and infection risk.
UNASSIGNED: To characterise siponimod-related lymphopenia in people with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (pwSPMS).
UNASSIGNED: This is a retrospective cohort of 188 pwSPMS. The development of grade 4 lymphopenia was interrogated with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and binary logistic regression.
UNASSIGNED: Lymphopenia develops soon after commencing siponimod. In total, 15 (8.5%) of 176 experienced grade 4 lymphopenia at 1 month after initiation. There were no clinically significant associations between patient characteristics and development of grade 4 lymphopenia.
UNASSIGNED: Grade 4 lymphopenia can occur soon after siponimod initiation and cannot be predicted.

UNASSIGNED: Siponimod is approved for use in people with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (pwSPMS). An integrated digital platform, MSGo, was developed for pwSPMS and clinicians to help navigate the multiple steps of the pre-siponimod work-up.
UNASSIGNED: To explore real-world onboarding experiences of siponimod amongst pwSPMS in Australia.
UNASSIGNED: Retrospective, non-interventional, longitudinal, secondary analysis of data extracted from MSGo (20 April 2022). The primary endpoint was the average time for siponimod onboarding; secondary endpoints were adherence and sub-group analyses of variables influencing onboarding.
UNASSIGNED: Mixed-cure modelling estimated that 58% of participants (N = 368, females 71%, median age of 59 years) registered in MSGo would ever initiate siponimod. The median time to initiation was 56 days (95% CI [47-59] days). Half of the participants cited \'waiting for vaccination\' as the reason for initiation delay. Cox regression analyses found participants with a nominated care partner had faster onboarding (HR 2.1, 95% CI [1.5-3.0]) and were more likely to continue self-reporting daily siponimod dosing than were those without a care partner (HR 2.2, 95% CI [1.3-3.7]).
UNASSIGNED: Despite the limitations of self-reported data and the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, this study provides insights into siponimod onboarding in Australia and demonstrates the positive impact of care partner support.

In multiple sclerosis (MS), mitochondrial alterations appear to contribute to disease progression. The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator siponimod is approved for treating secondary progressive MS. Its preceding compound fingolimod was shown to prevent oxidative stress-induced alterations in mitochondrial morphology. Here, we assessed the effects of siponimod, compared to fingolimod, on neuronal mitochondria in oxidatively stressed hippocampal slices. We have also advanced the model of chronic organotypic hippocampal slices for live imaging, enabling semi-automated monitoring of mitochondrial alterations. The slices were prepared from B6.Cg-Tg(Thy1-CFP/COX8A)S2Lich/J mice that display fluorescent neuronal mitochondria. They were treated with hydrogen peroxide (oxidative stress paradigm) ± 1 nM siponimod or fingolimod for 24 h. Afterwards, mitochondrial dynamics were investigated. Under oxidative stress, the fraction of motile mitochondria decreased and mitochondria were shorter, smaller, and covered smaller distances. Siponimod partly prevented oxidatively induced alterations in mitochondrial morphology; for fingolimod, a similar trend was observed. Siponimod reduced the decrease in mitochondrial track displacement, while both compounds significantly increased track speed and preserved motility. The novel established imaging and analysis tools are suitable for assessing the dynamics of neuronal mitochondria ex vivo. Using these approaches, we showed that siponimod at 1 nM partially prevented oxidatively induced mitochondrial alterations in chronic brain slices.