BACKGROUND: In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated remarkable efficacy across diverse malignancies. Notably, in patients with advanced gastric cancer, the use of programmed death 1 (PD-1) blockade has significantly prolonged overall survival, marking a pivotal advancement comparable to the impact of Herceptin over the past two decades. While the therapeutic benefits of ICIs are evident, the increasing use of immunotherapy has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events.
METHODS: This article presents the case of a patient with advanced gastric cancer and chronic plaque psoriasis. Following sintilimab therapy, the patient developed severe rashes accompanied by cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Fortunately, effective management was achieved through the administration of glucocorticoid, tocilizumab, and acitretin, which resulted in favorable outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Glucocorticoid and tocilizumab therapy was effective in managing CRS after PD-1 blockade therapy for gastric cancer in a patient with chronic plaque psoriasis.

UNASSIGNED: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) no longer are approved for second-line or later treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), and have not been studied in combination with chemotherapy. Exploring the efficacy and safety of second-line or later immunotherapy for ES-SCLC is an urgent clinical question that needs to be addressed, and combination therapies are an important research direction. This study intended to investigate the efficacy and safety of the sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy as a second-line and beyond treatment option for ES-SCLC.
UNASSIGNED: Medical records of patients who received treatment with sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone as a second-line or beyond therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The study evaluated efficacy and safety. Indicators of efficacy included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety indicators included adverse events (AEs).
UNASSIGNED: This cohort comprised of 46 patients: 24 in the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group and 22 in the chemotherapy group. Chemotherapy received by both groups was either albumin-bound paclitaxel or irinotecan. Compared with the chemotherapy group, the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group had higher ORR and DCR (ORR: 37.5% vs. 9.1%, P=0.04; DCR: 75.0% vs. 40.9%, P=0.04), and significantly prolonged PFS and OS [median PFS (mPFS): 5.07 vs. 2.45 months, P=0.006; median OS (mOS): 14.43 vs. 10.34 months, P=0.009]. Also, there was no significant increase in the incidence of AEs in the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group, which was well tolerated by patients.
UNASSIGNED: Sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy is superior to single-agent chemotherapeutic treatment as second-line or later therapy in ES-SCLC patients who have not received prior immunotherapy. These results need to be confirmed in future clinical trials.

UNASSIGNED: We aimed to evaluate the effects of sintilimab plus radiotherapy on levels of Spondin-2 and glucose transporter-1 (Glut-1) in patients with cervical cancer.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 112 patients with cervical cancer treated from January 2019 to January 2021 were selected in this randomized control trial and divided into a control group (n = 56) and a study group (n = 56) using the random number table method. Chemotherapy using docetaxel + cisplatin was performed for both groups, based on which the control group was given radiotherapy (external conformal radiotherapy + intracavitary irradiation), and the study group received sintilimab plus radiotherapy. The treatment lasted for six cycles, with 21 days as one cycle.
UNASSIGNED: The total response rate of the study group was higher than that of the control group (55.36% vs 33.93%) (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in adverse effects between the two groups (P > 0.05). After six cycles of treatment, the levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, vascular endothelial growth factor-A, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, Spondin-2 and Glut-1 decreased in both groups compared with those before treatment, and they were lower in the study group (P < 0.05). The survival rate of the study group was higher than that of the control group (87.50% vs 71.43%) (P < 0.05).
UNASSIGNED: Sintilimab plus radiotherapy can effectively reduce the levels of serum tumor markers, such as Spondin-2 and Glut-1, and enhance the clinical efficacy on patients with cervical cancer, without increasing adverse effects.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrate unique advantages in the treatment of lung cancer and are widely used in the era of immunotherapy. However, ICIs can cause adverse reactions. Hematological toxicities induced by immunotherapy are relatively rare. Agranulocytosis, a rare hematologic adverse event associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, has received limited attention in terms of treatment and patient demographics. Herein, we report the case of a 68-year-old male with non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) who received two cycles of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody sintilimab immunotherapy combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy and one cycle of sintilimab monotherapy. He was diagnosed with grade 4 neutropenia and sepsis (with symptoms of fever and chills) after the first two cycles of treatment. Teicoplanin was promptly initiated as antimicrobial therapy. The patient presented with sudden high fever and developed agranulocytosis on the day of the third cycle of treatment initiation, characterized by an absolute neutrophil count of 0.0×109/L. The patient was treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor but did not show improvement. He was then treated with corticosteroids, and absolute neutrophil counts gradually returned to normal levels. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of sintilimab-induced agranulocytosis in a patient with NSCLC. Sintilimab-induced severe neutropenia or agranulocytosis is a rare side effect that should be distinguished from chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and treated promptly with appropriate therapies; otherwise, the condition may worsen.

UNASSIGNED: As one of the most important breakthroughs in cancer therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors have greatly prolonged survival of patients with breast cancer. However, their application and efficacy are limited, especially for advanced HER2-negative breast cancer. It has been reported that epigenetic modulation of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor chidamide, as well as immune microenvironment modulation of radiotherapy are potentially synergistic with immunotherapy. Thus, the combination of chidamide, radiotherapy and immunotherapy is expected to improve prognosis of patients with advanced HER2-negative breast cancer.
UNASSIGNED: This is a single-arm, open, prospective clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of the combination of HDAC inhibitor chidamide, anti-PD-1 antibody sintilimab, and the novel immuno-radiotherapy, which aims to enhance efficacy of immunotherapy, in subsequent lines of therapy of HER2-negative breast cancer. Our study will include 35 patients with advanced breast cancer that has failed endocrine therapy and first-line chemotherapy. Participants will receive 30 mg of chidamide twice a week, 200 mg of sintilimab once every 3 weeks, combined with immuno-radiotherapy. Radiotherapy will be centrally 8 Gy for at least one lesion, and at least 1 Gy for the other lesions. We will complete three fractions of radiotherapy in one cycle. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival, and secondary endpoints are objective response rate, disease control rate and safety. Moreover, biomarkers including cytokines and lymphocyte subgroups will be explored.
UNASSIGNED: As a single-arm clinical trial, the analysis of the influence of each single treatment is limited. Besides, our study is an open study, which involves neither randomization nor blinding. In spite of the abovementioned limitations, this prospective clinical trial will give an insight into subsequent lines of therapy of HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, prolong the survival or achieve long remission for these participants, and identify potential responders.

UNASSIGNED: The most effective method and length of time for administering adjuvant immunotherapy after surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are still unknown. Various clinical trials have utilized diverse strategies for adjuvant treatment. In this case, we explore the potential benefits of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in managing locally advanced lung squamous carcinoma, which often poses challenges for treatment. This multimodal approach aims to downstage tumors and optimize surgical outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Following a diagnosis of stage IIIB lung cancer, the patient underwent three cycles of neoadjuvant therapy using sintilimab, Abraxane, and Lobaplatin, resulting in a significant 45% reduction in tumor size. Subsequently, a right lower lobe lobectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy were performed using a uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach. Postoperative analysis revealed negative lymph nodes, with only a 5-mm residual tumor in the tumor bed, downstaging the cancer to IA1. Remarkably, the patient experienced a smooth recovery without any postoperative complications. One cycle of adjuvant therapy was administered following the operation to further support the patient\'s recovery and minimize the risk of disease recurrence. This comprehensive treatment approach underscores the importance of neoadjuvant therapy in optimizing surgical outcomes and improving long-term prognosis for patients with locally advanced lung cancer.
UNASSIGNED: For patients with stage III locally advanced lung squamous carcinoma, the combination of Sintilimab and Platinum-based drugs can be used as a neoadjuvant therapy which can reduce the difficulty of the operation.

UNASSIGNED: Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and anti-angiogenic drugs have become a hotspot in research of anti-tumor programs; however, they can also cause some rare drug-related adverse reactions. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) cause adverse reactions in the body, collectively known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Ocular side effects can occur in both targeted and immunotherapy patients, including dry eye, blurred vision, uveitis, conjunctivitis, retinopathy, or thyroid eye disease. To our knowledge, this is the first case report describing corneal ulcers secondary to dry eye in a patient treated with the combination of PD-1 inhibitor sintilimab and multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) anlotinib.
UNASSIGNED: A 65-year-old woman with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and bone metastases, without pre-existing ocular conditions, experienced mild dry eye symptoms 1 month following treatment with sintilimab (200 mg q3w) in combination with anlotinib (12 mg q3w). Unrelieved dry eye symptoms occurred after the third cycle of chemotherapy, and she was diagnosed with dry eye syndrome. Subsequently, she received corneal protective lens, sodium hyaluronate eye drops, and prednisone treatment. Her corneal epithelial damage did not improve significantly, and within the following 2 months, her vision decreased in both eyes and progressed to bilateral corneal ulcers. Oral administration of sintilimab and anlotinib was interrupted, and treatments such as corticosteroids, anti-inflammatory drugs, and corneal repair were administered; however, both eyes presented with corneal subepithelial defect and corneal scarring. Due to a shortage of donors, no corneal transplantation surgery could be performed.
UNASSIGNED: The development of corneal epithelial disorders in patients receiving target therapy and immunotherapy may not be reversed by reducing its dose. Although the condition is controlled with the use of glucocorticoids, some eye side effects cannot be cured. The timely detection and intervention of adverse effects of anti-tumor drugs by oncologists and ophthalmologists is critical for rational prescription. Ophthalmologists should be aware of eye side effects in patients using immunotherapy to ensure appropriate treatment and minimize potential eye complications such as dry eye, conjunctivitis, etc.

UNASSIGNED: Sintilimab plus chemotherapy has proven effective as a combination immunotherapy for patients with advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC). A multi-center study conducted in China revealed a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.1 months. However, the prediction of response duration to this immunotherapy has not been thoroughly investigated. Additionally, the potential of baseline laboratory features in predicting PFS remains largely unexplored. Therefore, we developed an interpretable machine learning (ML) framework, iPFS-SC, aimed at predicting PFS using baseline (pre-treatment) laboratory features and providing interpretations of the predictions.
UNASSIGNED: A cohort of 146 patients with advanced GC/GEJC, along with their baseline laboratory features, was included in the iPFS-SC framework. Through a forward feature selection process, predictive baseline features were identified, and four ML algorithms were developed to categorize PFS duration based on a threshold of 7.1 months. Furthermore, we employed explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methodologies to elucidate the relationship between features and model predictions.
UNASSIGNED: The findings demonstrated that LightGBM achieved an accuracy of 0.70 in predicting PFS for advanced GC/GEJC patients. Furthermore, an F1-score of 0.77 was attained for identifying patients with PFS durations shorter than 7.1 months. Through the feature selection process, we identified 11 predictive features. Additionally, our framework facilitated the discovery of relationships between laboratory features and PFS.
UNASSIGNED: A ML-based framework was developed to predict Sintilimab plus chemotherapy response duration with high accuracy. The suggested predictive features are easily accessible through routine laboratory tests. Furthermore, XAI techniques offer comprehensive explanations, both at the global and individual level, regarding PFS predictions. This framework enables patients to better understand their treatment plans, while clinicians can customize therapeutic approaches based on the explanations provided by the model.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated superior clinical efficacy in prolonging overall survival (OS) as the second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and were recommended by the guidelines. However, it remains uncertain which ICI is the most cost-effective. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of ICIs as the second-line treatment for ESCC based on the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.
METHODS: A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to obtain the Hazard ratios (HRs) for indirect comparisons. A three-state Markov model with a 10-year time horizon was conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness. The state transition probabilities were calculated with Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves data from clinical trial and HRs from the NMA. Utilities and costs were derived from local charges or previously published studies. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to examine model robustness. The results were assessed based on the total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).
RESULTS: Five clinical trials (ATTRACTION-3, ESCORT, KEYNOTE-181, ORIENT-2, RATIONALE-302) with a total of 1797 patients were included in the NMA. The NMA showed that both camrelizumab and tislelizumab received relatively high rankings for progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Compared with sintilimab, treatment with tislelizumab and camrelizumab gained 0.018 and 0.034 additional QALYs, resulting in incremental ICERs of $75,472.65/QALY and $175,681.9/QALY, respectively. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab produced lower QALYs and greater costs, suggesting that both were dominated in comparison to sintilimab. HRs and health state utilities were the most influential parameters in most univariate sensitivity analyses of paired comparisons. PSA results suggested that sintilimab had an 84.4% chance of being the most cost-effective treatment regimen at the WTP threshold of $38,223.34/QALY. In the scenario analysis, sintilimab would no longer be cost-effective, if the price of camrelizumab was assumed to decrease by 64.6% or the price of tislelizumab was assumed to decrease by 16.9%.
CONCLUSIONS: Among the five potential competing ICIs, sintilimab was likely to be the most cost-effective regimen as the second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic ESCC in China.

There has been rapid advancement in the development of neoadjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which holds great promise as an effective treatment strategy. Some clinical trials have confirmed that immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy can be a recommended first-line regimen for neoadjuvant treatment of NSCLC. The present study describes the case of a male patient aged 65 years who was diagnosed with stage IIIA (cT2N2M0) adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung. After the administration of two cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy (sintilimab) in combination with chemotherapy, stable disease was observed in the primary tumor, whereas partial remission was detected in the mediastinal lymph nodes based on imaging assessment. The patient underwent an immediate upper lobectomy of the left lung. Pathological analysis revealed a complete response in the primary lesion, with only minimal presence of tumor cells observed in the lymph nodes surrounding the mediastinum and bronchi. This indicated that the present neoadjuvant therapy could be used in the treatment of stage III adenosquamous lung carcinoma; however, to conclusively determine its efficacy, further studies targeting this specific cancer type are essential.