UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the clinical and prognostic behaviors of sinonasal papillomas.
UNASSIGNED: Patients diagnosed with sinonasal papilloma were reviewed between 2001 and 2016 at a tertiary rhinology practice. Using pathology-specific electronic medical record software, patients diagnosed with sinonasal papilloma were identified. Four subcategories of this lesion were identified: inverting (IP), exophytic (EP) oncocytic (OP) and inverting + exophytic (IP + EP) papillomas.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 107 patients were identified with unique sinonasal papilloma diagnoses. Of these, the majority were diagnosed with IP (87, 81.3%). The subpopulation of patients co-diagnosed with IP and EP (IP + EP) was unique with respect to clinical presentation and prognosis relative to both the IP and EP alone populations. IP + EP patients (5, 4.7%) were older with an average age of 75.25 years compared to 45 (EP) and 55.26 (IP), p < .0001. IP + EP patients more often presented with epistaxis (60%) compared to 33.3% (EP) and 4.6% (IP). Finally, all IP + EP patients had at least one recurrence of their disease, compared to 33.3% (EP) and 28.5% (IP).
UNASSIGNED: Each histopathologic subtype of sinonasal papilloma has unique clinical characteristics and recurrence rates after surgical resection. The subpopulation of patients diagnosed with IP + EP tends to be older, more likely to present with epistaxis, and more likely to recur. Additional investigation and analysis of this subpopulation is warranted.
UNASSIGNED: 4.

Various malignant and benign tumors can arise in the sinonasal cavity, including inverted papilloma (IP), a benign neoplasm with unique clinical characteristics. However, the mechanisms involved in the recurrence, occurrence, and malignant transformation of IP remain debatable. This study aimed to investigate the impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) infections on IP by comparing the number of infections in cases with epithelial tissue dysplasia and explore the predictive role of proliferative and prognostic markers in dysplasia. Tissue blocks from 35 cases of sinonasal papilloma, collected between 2015 and 2021 from the laboratory archives of the Medical City of Ghazi Al-Hererri Hospital in Baghdad, Iraq, were immunohistochemically stained with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to detect Ki-67 and p53. A quantitative immunohistochemical analysis was conducted to analyze the results. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to detect HPV genotypes 16/18 and 6/11 in the tissues. There was an insignificant increase in Ki-67 and p53 expression in inverted papillomas with dysplasia. HPV11 was the most prevalent genotype in 34.3% of the patients, followed by HPV16 and HPV18 in 31.4% of the patients for each virus. The least common virus detected was human papillomavirus 6 (8.6%), which did not show any significant association with the degree of dysplasia. Viral detection proliferation and apoptosis had no impact on tumor dysplasia amongst all the patients, showing no relationship with the evaluated cases.

UNASSIGNED: Sinonasal inverted papilloma is a rare benign tumor of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses (PNS). Radiological evaluation is the key to management.
UNASSIGNED: A 46-year-old male presented with complaints of right nasal congestion and occasional bleeding for 4 months. During anterior rhinoscopy, a pinkish fleshy mass occupying the right nasal cavity was seen. X-ray and computed tomography (CT) PNS view showed opacification in the right nasal cavity and maxillary sinus. An MRI of the nose and PNS revealed a peculiar convoluted striated/cerebriform pattern. Histopathology report described the features of an inverted papilloma. The patient underwent endoscopic removal of the mass under general anesthesia. Surgical resection of the tumor was performed along with adjacent normal mucosal tissues. The patient recovered well and was followed-up for recurrence.
UNASSIGNED: Sinonasal inverted papilloma is commonly found in males in their fifth to sixth decade of life. A CT scan is the initial modality of choice to evaluate the extent of the disease. MRI is superior to CT in distinguishing tumors from other conditions as well as to evaluate soft tissue extensions. Involvement of the frontal sinus is a risk factor for recurrence. The first option for treating an inverted papilloma is complete surgical removal with the adjacent uninvolved mucosa.
UNASSIGNED: In a biopsy-proven case, radiological assessments like CT and MRI play a pivotal role in studying the typical morphology, delineating the extension, and detecting recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field.
METHODS: In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication.
RESULTS: The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.

The sinonasal tract is considered a second hotspot for human papillomavirus (HPV)-related tumors in the head and neck, with HPV being identified in up to 62% of squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) and 38% of papillomas. There is limited data from geographical regions with low prevalence of high-risk (HR)-HPV on the association of HR-HPV in sinonasal neoplasms and on utility of p16 as a surrogate marker. p16 immunohistochemistry, HR-HPV mRNA ISH and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) were performed on a retrospective cohort of sinonasal papillomas and SCCs. KRAS mutation analysis was done in oncocytic papillomas. p16 positivity was present in 22/142 cases (15.5%) including eight inverted papillomas, one oncocytic papilloma (OP), and 13 SCC. Among these, mRNA ISH showed HR-HPV in the OP and two SCC, while another SCC was found to harbour HPV18 by qPCR. Two HPV-associated SCCs had foci of OP. mRNA ISH was negative in all p16 negative cases. p16 immunohistochemistry showed 68% concordance with mRNA ISH, and had sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100%; specificity was 67%, and positive predictive value was 14.3%. Association with HR-HPV in sinonasal papillomas and SCC is rare, and may be seen in cases demonstrating oncocytic morphology. p16 immunohistochemistry has low specificity and positive predictive value in low-prevalence populations; thus, reflex direct HR-HPV testing should be performed in p16 immunopositive cases. This two-step approach is viable in resource-limited settings, as the proportion of p16 positive cases is small.

Carcinomas of the head-and-neck region with squamous and glandular/mucinous features constitute a heterogeneous group, with a significant minority of tumors showing an human papillomavirus (HPV) association. The differential diagnosis is usually between mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) and adenosquamous carcinoma. We present here two tumors that exemplify both the challenges of diagnostic classification, as well as the complex relationship to HPV: (a) a low risk HPV positive/p16 negative carcinoma that is most consistent with a relatively typical intermediate grade mucoepidermoid type carcinoma with complete MEC phenotype (three cell types), originating from intranasal sinonasal papillomas with exophytic and inverted patterns, and invading surrounding maxillary compartments, and (b) a p16 and keratin 7 (KRT7) positive carcinoma of the right tonsil, characterized by stratified squamous and mucinous cell (mucocyte) features. Whereas the first tumor represents a typical MEC ex-Schneiderian papilloma, the second is morphologically most consistent with the, novel for this anatomic location, diagnosis of \"invasive stratified mucin producing carcinoma\" (ISMC), pointing to an analogy to similar, high-risk HPV-driven malignancies recently described in the gynecologic (GYN) and genitourinary (GU) areas. Both tumors, despite their mucoepidermoid-like features had no connection to salivary glands and lacked the MAML2 translocation typical of salivary gland MEC, pointing to a mucosal/non-salivary gland origin. Using these two carcinomas as examples, we attempt to address questions related to: (a) the histological distinction between MEC, adenosquamous carcinoma, and ISMC, (b) similarities and differences between these histological entities in mucosal sites versus morphologically similar salivary gland tumors, and (c) the role of HPV in these tumors.

Sinonasal biopsy specimens are a challenging area in anatomic pathology. The small, often fragmented or crushed nature of these biopsies can hinder morphologic assessment. Additionally, many of the tumors in this area are rare and share morphologic, and sometime immunophenotypic similarities. In many cases, immunohistochemistry is helpful if not necessary to reach a specific diagnosis. In other cases, a specific diagnosis is not possible and a differential diagnosis must be given on a biopsy specimen despite access to a well-equipped immunohistochemistry laboratory. This review article groups some of the more challenging entities in the sinonasal region based on morphologic patterns. These include low grade squamoid lesions such as sinonasal (Schneiderian) papilloma and DEK::AFF2 rearranged carcinoma, glandular neoplasms such as intestinal and non-intestinal type sinonasal adenocarcinoma, high-grade carcinomas such as HPV-related multiphenotypic sinonasal carcinoma, NUT carcinoma and SWI/SNF deficient carcinomas, small round blue cell tumors such as teratocarcinosarcoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma and olfactory neuroblastoma, and finally, low grade spindle cell neoplasms such as glomangiopericytoma, biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma and solitary fibrous tumor.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the epidemiology, subtypes, trends over time, and predictive factors for recurrence and malignant transformation of sinonasal papillomas.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 118 patients with sinonasal papillomas from 2009 to 2019 was conducted at the University of California, Los Angeles. This study is a follow-up to a previously published study from 2000 to 2009 at the same academic center.
RESULTS: The mean age was at presentation was 58.5 years, with a 2:1 male to female ratio, and average follow-up of 30.1 months. The rate of recurrence after complete resection was 19% with an average of 32.6 months to recurrence. The time to recurrence followed a bimodal distribution with 57% of cases recurring within 24 months (mean = 10) and 43% from 40 to 103 months (mean = 61). The proportion of the inverted papillomas rose from 38% in 2000-2004 to 89.6% in 2015-2019. Patients presenting at a younger age had a higher chance of recurrence (mean age 52 with recurrence vs. 61 without recurrence). Age did not correlate with histopathologic transformation in surgical pathology. Furthermore, histopathological transformation did not raise the chance of recurrence. Smoking, alcohol use, chronic rhinosinusitis, and allergic rhinitis were not associated with any of the outcome measures in this study. The most significant factor predicting recurrence, beside age at presentation, was the history of two or more prior sinus surgeries for papillomas or other reasons (OR = 3.52 and 5.81).
CONCLUSIONS: This study explored the features of sinonasal papillomas as well as the risk factors for recurrence and transformation. Younger age at presentation and two or more prior surgeries for papillomas were associated with recurrence. Time to recurrence followed a bimodal distribution, with late recurrences happenning from 40 to 103 months after surgery, emphasizing the importance of long-term follow-up for timely resection of tumors and prevention of malignancy.

Sinonasal non-intestinal type adenocarcinoma (non-ITAC) is a heterogeneous category that may benefit from improved taxonomy. With the recognition that most non-ITAC are phenotypically seromucinous, stratification may be improved by applying salivary type morphologic criteria and molecular findings. We report two cases of papillary seromucinous adenocarcinoma with sinonasal papilloma-like surface components that show histologic and molecular features analogous to the salivary sialadenoma papilliferum family of tumors. Case 1 concerns a 50-year-old female who presented with a left anterior nasoethmoid polyp, while case 2 is that of a 74 year old female with nasal polyposis. Histologically, both cases demonstrated a surface transitional sinonasal papilloma-like component (more prominent in case 2) with a deeper bilayered glandular component showing papillary and tufted micropapillary growth of monomorphic columnar to cuboidal cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm. Case 1 also showed a deep cribriform/microcystic component. Immunostains showed a delimiting p63/p40 positive basal layer around the SOX-10 positive glandular elements, while the transitional sinonasal papilloma-like components were diffusely p63/p40 positive. Like sialadenoma papilliferum and related tumors, both cases demonstrated BRAF p.V600E mutations in both components and no other alterations. The patients remain disease free at 9 and 19 months respectively. Our cases illustrate a novel sinonasal lesion and suggest that improved morphologic and molecular categorization may refine and reduce the category of non-ITAC.

To assess malignant transformation rate, non-sinonasal malignancies, and factors contributing to recurrence in patients treated for sinonasal inverted papilloma (SNIP).
Retrospective study.
We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all patients treated for SNIP (n = 296) between the years 1984-2014 at Helsinki University Hospital. Data from the Finnish Cancer Registry confirmed the number of those patients with sinonasal and non-sinonasal malignancies.
Only 2 of 296 (0.7%) patients primarily diagnosed with benign SNIP developed sinonasal cancer in a mean follow-up of 5.8 years. The most common non-sinonasal cancer sites were similar to those reported for the whole Finnish population. None of the patients presented with an HPV-associated non-sinonasal malignancy. The recurrence rate among patients who underwent attachment-oriented surgery was significantly lower compared to those operated on with other approaches (40.2% vs. 56.6%, p = 0.006). Dysplasia in SNIP was associated with a higher recurrence rate (p < 0.001).
Malignant transformation of SNIP was rare. Patients with SNIP were not prone to HPV-associated non-sinonasal malignancies. Endoscopic resection and attachment-oriented surgery have become predominant approaches in the treatment of SNIP; meanwhile, the total number of SNIP recurrences has decreased.
3 Laryngoscope, 133:506-511, 2023.