single-arm meta-analysis

单臂荟萃分析
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    免疫治疗已成为肝细胞癌(HCC)的标准治疗方法,但它具有可能危及生命的免疫相关不良事件(irAE)的风险.本研究采用文献计量学分析来了解全球癌症中irAE的科学研究,专注于特点和感兴趣的领域。此外,一项荟萃分析全面概述了接受基于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的治疗的HCC患者的irAE.
    我们对1999年至2022年的WebofScienceCoreCollection(WoSCC)出版物进行了彻底搜索。使用R和VOSviewer软件进行分析。使用来自PubMed的数据进行荟萃分析,Embase,和Cochrane图书馆数据库截至2022年3月22日。包括报告irAE发生率的HCC患者的试验。质量评估遵循Cochrane偏差风险,纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS),和非随机研究的方法学指数(MINORS)。我们使用基于I2值的随机效应或固定效应模型。主要结果包括任何级别的irAE和≥3级irAE。这篇综述和荟萃分析在PROSPERO中注册为CRD42022318885。
    在文献计量分析中,我们收录了2946篇论文,显示癌症研究中关于irAE的年度出版物持续增长。常用的关键词是“nivolumab”,“免疫检查点抑制剂”,和“免疫相关不良事件”。“肝细胞癌”成为与irAE相关的突出研究热点。我们对HCC患者的irAE发生率进行了全面的荟萃分析,包括29项研究。任何级别IRAE的总发生率为61.0%(95%CI38.5%-81.3%),≥3级irAE为13.2%(95%CI7.9%-19.6%)。治疗相关死亡率为3.1%(95%CI0.8%-6.3%),治疗中断为10.7%(95%CI6.3%-16.0%)。反应性皮肤毛细血管内皮增生(RCCEP)是最常见的任何级别的irAE,而天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)升高是最常见的≥3级irAE。治疗策略与特定的irAE独立相关,如多变量分析表明。
    这项研究提供了对当前癌症中irAE的研究前景的宝贵见解,并对接受ICI治疗的HCC患者的irAE进行了全面概述。irAE的相对较高的发生率及其与治疗策略的关联强调了临床医生在治疗HCC患者时需要谨慎管理。这些发现为优化HCC患者的护理和治疗提供了重要指导。
    UNASSIGNED: Immunotherapy has become the standard treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but it carries a risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that can be life-threatening. This study employs bibliometric analysis to understand global scientific research on irAEs in cancer, focusing on characteristics and areas of interest. Additionally, a meta-analysis provides a comprehensive overview of irAEs in HCC patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a thorough search of Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) publications from 1999 to 2022. R and VOSviewer software were used for analysis. A meta-analysis was performed using data from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases up to March 22, 2022. Trials with HCC patients reporting irAE incidence were included. Quality assessment followed Cochrane risk of bias, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). We used random-effects or fixed-effects models based on I2 values. Primary outcomes included any-grade irAEs and grade ≥ 3 irAEs. This review and meta-analysis are registered in PROSPERO as CRD42022318885.
    UNASSIGNED: In bibliometric analysis, we included 2946 papers, showing a consistent rise in annual publications on irAEs in cancer research. Frequent keywords were \"nivolumab\", \"immune checkpoint inhibitor\", and \"immune-related adverse event\". \"Hepatocellular carcinoma\" emerged as a prominent research focus linked to irAEs. We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis on irAE incidence in HCC patients, including 29 studies. The overall incidence of any-grade irAEs was 61.0% (95% CI 38.5%-81.3%), and grade ≥ 3 irAEs was 13.2% (95% CI 7.9%-19.6%). Treatment-related mortality occurred in 3.1% (95% CI 0.8%-6.3%), with treatment discontinuation at 10.7% (95% CI 6.3%-16.0%). Reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) was the most common any-grade irAE, while elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) was the most common grade ≥ 3 irAE. Treatment strategies were independently associated with specific irAEs, as indicated by multivariable analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: This study provides valuable insights into the current research landscape of irAEs in cancer and ofers a comprehensive overview of irAEs in HCC patients undergoing ICI-based therapy. The relatively high incidence of irAEs and their association with treatment strategies emphasize the need for careful management by clinicians when treating HCC patients. These findings offer significant guidance for optimizing care and treatment for HCC patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:尿路上皮癌(UC)是一种难治性疾病,目前的手术干预措施仍具有挑战性。抗体-药物缀合物(ADC)是一类新的靶向治疗剂,其已经证明对UC的令人鼓舞的结果。尽管有数量有限的高质量随机对照试验(RCT)检查ADC在UC患者中的使用,一些前瞻性非随机干预研究(NRSIs)提供了有价值的见解和相关信息.我们的目的是评估ADC在UC患者中的疗效和安全性,特别是那些患有局部晚期和转移性疾病的人。方法:对PubMed进行了系统搜索,Embase,Cochrane图书馆,和WebofScience数据库来确定相关研究。结果,例如总反应率(ORR),疾病控制率(DCR),无进展生存期(PFS),总生存期(OS),不良事件(AE),和治疗相关的不良事件(TRAE),被提取用于进一步分析。结果:该荟萃分析包括12项研究,涉及1,311例患者。就肿瘤反应而言,合并的ORR和DCR分别为40%和74%,分别。关于生存分析,合并的中位PFS和OS分别为5.66个月和12.63个月,分别。合并的6个月PFS和OS分别为47%和80%,而合并的1年PFS和OS分别为22%和55%,分别。ADC最常见的TRAE是脱发(所有等级:45%,≥III级:0%),食欲下降(所有年级:34%,≥III级:3%),发育不良(所有年级:40%,≥III级:0%),疲劳(所有等级:39%,≥III级:5%),恶心(所有等级:45%,≥III级:2%),周围感觉神经病变(所有等级:37%,≥III级:2%),瘙痒(所有等级:32%,≥III级:1%)。结论:本研究的荟萃分析表明,ADC对晚期或转移性UC患者具有良好的疗效和安全性。系统审查注册:https://www。crd.约克。AC.英国/普华永道/,标识符:CRD42023460232。
    Introduction: Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a refractory disease for which achieving satisfactory outcomes remains challenging with current surgical interventions. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a novel class of targeted therapeutics that have demonstrated encouraging results for UC. Although there is a limited number of high-quality randomized control trials (RCTs) examining the use of ADCs in patients with UC, some prospective non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSIs) provide valuable insights and pertinent information. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of ADCs in patients with UC, particularly those with locally advanced and metastatic diseases. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to identify pertinent studies. Outcomes, such as the overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events (AEs), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), were extracted for further analyses. Results: Twelve studies involving 1,311 patients were included in this meta-analysis. In terms of tumor responses, the pooled ORR and DCR were 40% and 74%, respectively. Regarding survival analysis, the pooled median PFS and OS were 5.66 months and 12.63 months, respectively. The pooled 6-month PFS and OS were 47% and 80%, while the pooled 1-year PFS and OS were 22% and 55%, respectively. The most common TRAEs of the ADCs were alopecia (all grades: 45%, grades ≥ III: 0%), decreased appetite (all grades: 34%, grades ≥ III: 3%), dysgeusia (all grades: 40%, grades ≥ III: 0%), fatigue (all grades: 39%, grades ≥ III: 5%), nausea (all grades: 45%, grades ≥ III: 2%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (all grades: 37%, grades ≥ III: 2%), and pruritus (all grades: 32%, grades ≥ III: 1%). Conclusion: The meta-analysis in this study demonstrates that ADCs have promising efficacies and safety for patients with advanced or metastatic UC. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42023460232.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:由于侵袭性,治疗侵袭性浅表鳞状细胞癌(SCC)面临挑战。对于重要器官附近有广泛肿瘤的不可手术病例,建议姑息治疗。面临毁容或功能损害的风险。电化学疗法(ECT)是一种新兴的皮肤肿瘤治疗方法,但其对浅层SCC的疗效尚不确定.本研究进行了系统评价和单臂荟萃分析,以评估ECT对浅层SCC的有效性,并为临床实践提供最新证据。
    方法:Embase,搜索PubMed和Cochrane图书馆进行了截至2023年5月的研究。随机效应模型分析了完全反应(CR)和部分反应(PR),根据药物剂量进行亚组评估,治疗反应评估,肿瘤大小,主要/复发状态,和肿瘤的位置。
    结果:纳入了涉及162例患者和208例肿瘤的10项研究。经ECT治疗的浅表SCC的合并CR和PR率为66.5%(95%CI48.4%-82.5%;I2=84%)和20.3%(95%CI10.5%-32.3%;I2=70%),分别。亚组分析显示ECT治疗原发性肿瘤的优越性(PR:70%,CR:30%)和肿瘤≤3厘米(PR:81.3%,CR:10.1%)与复发肿瘤相比(PR:56.7%,CR:36.5%)和肿瘤>3厘米(PR:45.2%,CR:34.4%)。
    结论:这项单臂荟萃分析证实了ECT对浅层SCC的疗效,尤其是在原发性肿瘤和直径≤3厘米的肿瘤中。该研究强调了肿瘤位置和反应评估对ECT获益的影响,保证通过额外的研究进行进一步的调查。
    OBJECTIVE: Treating aggressive superficial squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) poses challenges due to invasiveness. Palliative care is recommended for inoperable cases with extensive tumors near vital organs, risking disfigurement or functional impairment. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is an emerging cutaneous tumor treatment, but its efficacy against superficial SCC remains uncertain. This study conducts a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis to evaluate ECT\'s effectiveness against superficial SCC and provide current evidence for clinical practice.
    METHODS: Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched for studies up to May 2023. The random effects model analyzed complete response (CR) and partial response (PR), with subgroup assessment based on drug dosage, treatment response evaluation, tumor size, primary/recurrent status, and tumor location.
    RESULTS: Ten studies involving 162 patients and 208 tumors were included. Pooled CR and PR rates for ECT-treated superficial SCC were 66.5% (95% CI 48.4%-82.5%; I2 = 84%) and 20.3% (95% CI 10.5%-32.3%; I2 = 70%), respectively. Subgroup analysis indicated ECT\'s superiority in treating primary tumors (PR: 70%, CR: 30%) and tumors ≤ 3 cm (PR: 81.3%, CR: 10.1%) compared to recurrent tumors (PR: 56.7%, CR: 36.5%) and tumors > 3 cm (PR: 45.2%, CR: 34.4%).
    CONCLUSIONS: This single-arm meta-analysis confirms ECT\'s efficacy against superficial SCC, especially in primary tumors and those ≤ 3 cm in diameter. The study highlights the impact of tumor location and response evaluation on ECT\'s benefits, warranting further investigation through additional research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项荟萃分析旨在评估新型抗癫痫药物(AEDs)治疗脑肿瘤(BTRE)患者癫痫的有效性和安全性。
    在PubMed上进行了搜索,EMBASE,WebofScience,和Cochrane图书馆从成立到2023年2月,英语限制。
    在此荟萃分析中,纳入了18项涉及755名BTRE患者的临床试验,以评估新型AEDs在BTRE治疗中的疗效和安全性。在最后一次随访中,72%的患者癫痫发作频率降低≥50%(随机效应模型,95%CI=0.64-0.78)使用新型AED。在最后一次随访中,34%的患者经历了癫痫发作自由(随机效应模型,95%CI=0.28-0.41)使用新型AED。合并的不良事件发生率为19%(95%CI:13%-26%),由于不利影响,退出率仅为3%。在拉科沙胺和perampanel之间观察到相当的疗效和不良反应发生率。
    这项荟萃分析表明,新型抗癫痫药物被认为对脑肿瘤患者的癫痫发作控制有效,特别是当用作辅助治疗时。尽管拉科沙胺和帕潘妮在研究中得到了更多的关注,这两种药物在癫痫发作控制中的疗效和不良反应没有显着差异。进一步的随机对照试验被认为有必要验证我们的发现。
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of novel antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in treating epilepsy in patients with brain tumors (BTRE).
    UNASSIGNED: A search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2023, with English language restriction.
    UNASSIGNED: In this meta-analysis, 18 clinical trials involving 755 BTRE patients were included to assess the efficacy and safety of novel AEDs in BTRE treatment. At the last follow-up, a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency was experienced by 72% of patients (random-effects model, 95% CI = 0.64-0.78) using novel AEDs. At the last follow-up, seizure freedom was experienced by 34% of patients (random-effects model, 95% CI = 0.28-0.41) using novel AEDs. The pooled incidence of AEs was found to be 19% (95% CI: 13%-26%), with a withdrawal rate due to adverse effects of only 3%. Comparable efficacy and incidence of adverse effects were observed between lacosamide and perampanel.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis suggests that novel antiepileptic drugs are deemed effective for seizure control in brain tumor patients, particularly when used as adjunctive therapy. Although lacosamide and perampanel received more focus in studies, no significant difference was observed in the efficacy and adverse reactions of these two drugs in seizure control. Further randomized controlled trials are deemed necessary to validate our findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:接受癌症治疗的年轻女性的生存率有了显著提高,关注治疗后的生活质量。卵巢组织移植(OTT)是保持生育能力的可行选择;然而,关于最佳移植部位尚无共识。大多数关于OTT的研究是非随机对照试验,样本量有限,统计分析不受控制。留下哪个移植部位产生实现活产的最高机会的问题没有答案。
    目的:本荟萃分析旨在评估不同卵巢移植部位对术后生殖结局的影响。
    方法:我们坚持PRISMA报告项目的系统评价和荟萃分析建议。在PubMed中进行了系统搜索,Embase,WebofScience,和Cochrane图书馆从成立到2023年9月17日。纳入标准如下:(1)接受OTT并希望将来分娩的妇女,和(2)特定移植部位和相应妊娠结局的报告。排除标准包括无法分离或提取相关结果数据,病例报告,非原始或重复数据,和文章不是用英语写的。
    结果:12项研究(201名女性)被纳入OTT后累积活产率(CLBR)的荟萃分析。CLBR,其中包括自然妊娠和通过OTT到卵巢部位后的辅助生殖技术(ART)实现的妊娠,为21%(95%CI:6-40,I2:52.81%,随机效应)。移植到骨盆部位,活产率为30%(95%CI:20-40,I2:0.00%,固定效应)。联合移植到盆腔和卵巢部位导致23%的活产率(95%CI:11-36,I2:0.00%,固定效应)。值得注意的是,异位OTT的活产率为3%(95%CI:0-17,I2:0.00%,固定效应)。
    结论:原位卵巢移植后妊娠结局无显著差异,原位OTT后的妊娠率和活产率明显高于异位移植后。
    背景:INPLASY202390008。
    BACKGROUND: Survival rates of young women undergoing cancer treatment have substantially improved, with a focus on post-treatment quality of life. Ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT) is a viable option to preserve fertility; however, there is no consensus on the optimal transplantation site. Most studies on OTT are nonrandomized controlled trials with limited sample sizes and uncontrolled statistical analyses, leaving the question of which transplant site yields the highest chance of achieving a live birth unanswered.
    OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of different ovarian transplant sites on postoperative reproductive outcomes.
    METHODS: We adhered to the PRISMA Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations. Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to September 17, 2023. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) women who underwent OTT with a desire for future childbirth, and (2) reports of specific transplant sites and corresponding pregnancy outcomes. The exclusion criteria included the inability to isolate or extract relevant outcome data, case reports, non-original or duplicate data, and articles not written in English.
    RESULTS: Twelve studies (201 women) were included in the meta-analysis of cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) after OTT. The CLBR, which encompasses both spontaneous pregnancies and those achieved through assisted reproductive technology (ART) following OTT to the ovarian site, was 21% (95% CI: 6-40, I2: 52.81%, random effect). For transplantation to the pelvic site, the live birth rate was 30% (95% CI: 20-40, I2: 0.00%, fixed effect). Combining transplantation to both the pelvic and ovarian sites resulted in a live birth rate of 23% (95% CI: 11-36, I2: 0.00%, fixed effect). Notably, heterotopic OTT yielded a live birth rate of 3% (95% CI: 0-17, I2: 0.00%, fixed effect).
    CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy outcomes were not significantly different after orthotopic ovarian transplantation, and pregnancy and live birth rates after orthotopic OTT were significantly higher than those after ectopic transplantation.
    BACKGROUND: INPLASY202390008.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:在表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中,由于EGFR-TKI诱导的间质性肺病(ILD)引起的EGFR-酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)中断是缩短总生存期(OS)的因素。一些回顾性队列研究报道了EGFR-TKIs再给药的OS延长效应。本研究旨在确定EGFR-TKI诱导的ILD发作后再次施用EGFR-TKI的安全性。
    方法:PubMed,CINAHL,和WebofScience数据库进行了系统搜索,直到2023年5月30日。主要结果是在EGFR-TKI诱导的ILD发作后成功重新施用EGFR-TKIs。
    结果:共690例患者纳入本荟萃分析。初始EGFR-TKI诱导的ILD率为13.6%(95%置信区间[CI]:6.4-20.9)。EGFR-TKI诱导的ILD发病后EGFR-TKI的再给药率为40.2%(95%CI:26.7-53.7)。EGFR-TKI诱导的ILD发病后EGFR-TKIs的成功再给药率为81.9%(95%CI:73.8-90.0)。初始EGFR-TKI治疗后2级或更高不良事件患者的EGFR-TKI再给药成功率为76.1%(95%CI:55.6-96.6)。
    结论:尽管最初的EGFR-TKI诱导的ILD具有相对较高的发病率,在EGFR-TKI诱导的ILD发作后再给予EGFR-TKI可能是可行的治疗选择。
    In patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) interruption due to EGFR-TKI-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a factor for shorter overall survival (OS). Several retrospective cohort studies have reported an OS-prolonging effect of the readministration of EGFR-TKIs. This study aimed to determine the safety of readministration of EGFR-TKIs after the onset of EGFR-TKI-induced ILD.
    The PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched until May 30, 2023. The primary outcome was successful readministration of EGFR-TKIs after the onset of EGFR-TKI-induced ILD.
    A total of 690 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The initial EGFR-TKI-induced ILD rate was 13.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]:6.4-20.9). Readministration rate of EGFR-TKI after onset of EGFR-TKI-induced ILD was 40.2% (95% CI: 26.7-53.7). The successful readministration rate of EGFR-TKIs after onset of EGFR-TKI-induced ILD was 81.9% (95% CI: 73.8-90.0). Successful rate of EGFR-TKI readministration in patients with Grade 2 or higher adverse events post initial EGFR-TKI therapy was 76.1% (95% CI: 55.6-96.6).
    Although initial EGFR-TKI-induced ILD has a relatively high incidence, EGFR-TKI readministration after the onset of EGFR-TKI-induced ILD may be a viable treatment option.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    室间隔缺损(VSD)是急性心肌梗死(AMI)的机械性并发症之一。由于死亡率和术后并发症的高风险,需要一种新的替代方法。随着介入医学的发展,经导管封堵术治疗心肌梗死后室间隔缺损(PMIVSD)越来越多.本研究的目的是通过荟萃分析探讨经导管封堵PMIVSD的可行性和安全性。
    纳入的研究主要是经导管封堵PMIVSD的单臂研究。我们比较了VSD大小,设备尺寸,PMIVSD患者的术前危险因素和干预措施。我们分析了经导管封堵成功率,30天死亡率,以及残余分流的发生率。
    共纳入12篇单臂文章(284例患者)。术前高血压的综合发生率,高脂血症,糖尿病为66%[95%CI0.56-0.75],54%[95%CI0.40-0.68],和33%[95%CI]0.21-0.46],分别。多项研究报告了术前PCI,IABP,和CABG,为46%[95%CI0.15-0.80],60%[95%CI0.44-0.75],和8%[95%CI0.02-0.18]。11项研究报告了成功关闭的数量和30天死亡率;成功率为90%[95%CI0.86-0.94],30天死亡率达到27%[95%CI0.86-0.94]。
    对于PMIVSD患者,急性期经导管封堵术可作为抢救措施,在慢性期,它更有效,死亡率更低,但是应该考虑选择偏差的影响。残余分流是一种长期并发症,对患者具有高发生率和长期影响。更大,多中心,未来需要随机对照试验来确认经导管封堵PMIVSD的安全性和可靠性.
    UNASSIGNED: Ventricular septal defects (VSDs) are one of the mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Because of the high risks of mortality and postoperative complications, a new alternative method is needed. With the development of interventional medicine, transcatheter closure has been increasingly performed for postmyocardial infarction ventricular septal defects (PMIVSDs). The aim of this study is to explore the feasibility and safety of transcatheter closure of PMIVSDs by meta-analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: The included studies were mainly single-arm studies of transcatheter closure of PMIVSDs. We compared VSD size, device size, preoperative risk factors and interventions among PMIVSD patients. We analysed the transcatheter closure success rate, the 30-day mortality rate, and the incidence of residual shunts.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 12 single-arm articles (284 patients) were included. The combined incidences of preoperative hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, and diabetes were 66% [95% CI 0.56-0.75], 54% [95% CI 0.40-0.68], and 33% [95% CI] 0.21-0.46], respectively. Multiple studies reported the combined incidences of preoperative PCI, IABP, and CABG, which were 46% [95% CI 0.15-0.80], 60% [95% CI 0.44-0.75], and 8% [95% CI 0.02-0.18]. Eleven studies reported the number of successful closures and the 30-day mortality rate; the success rate was 90% [95% CI 0.86-0.94], and the 30-day mortality rate reached 27% [95% CI 0.86-0.94].
    UNASSIGNED: For patients with PMIVSD, transcatheter closure in the acute phase can be used as a rescue measure, while in the chronic phase, it is more effective and has a lower mortality rate, but the effect of selection bias should be considered. Residual shunts are a long-term complication that have a high incidence and long-lasting effects on patients. More large, multicentre, randomized controlled trials are needed in the future to confirm the safety and reliability of transcatheter closure of PMIVSDs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:为了获得并发症发生率,融合率,对腰椎皮质骨轨迹技术和椎弓根螺钉内固定技术在腰椎椎间融合术中的翻修率进行单臂Meta分析,为骨科医师选择内固定技术及围手术期处理奠定基础。
    方法:PubMed,OvidMedline,WebofScience,CNKI,和万方数据库进行了全面搜索。数据提取,内容分析,根据CochraneCollaboration指南,使用R和STATA软件进行单臂荟萃分析,由两名独立审稿人对文献进行质量评估.
    结果:腰椎皮质骨轨迹技术的总并发症发生率为6%,包括2%的硬件并发症率,ASD(邻近节段退变)率为1%,伤口感染率为1%,硬脑膜损伤率1%,血肿率趋于0%,融合率94%,修订率为1%。腰椎椎弓根螺钉固定技术总并发症发生率为9%,硬件并发症发生率为2%,ASD率为3%,伤口感染率为2%,硬脑膜损伤率1%,血肿率趋于0%,融合率94%,和5%的修订率。这项研究在PROSPERO注册,CRD42022354550。
    结论:腰椎皮质骨轨迹与较低的总并发症发生率相关,ASD费率,伤口感染率,翻修率高于椎弓根螺钉固定。皮质骨轨迹技术降低了术中和术后并发症的发生率,可作为腰椎椎间融合术的一种替代方法。
    BACKGROUND: To obtain the complication rate, fusion rate, and revision rate of the lumbar cortical bone trajectory technique and pedicle screw fixation technique in lumbar interbody fusion surgery by single-arm meta-analysis and lay a basis for orthopedic surgeons to select the fixation techniques and perioperative management.
    METHODS: PubMed, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were searched comprehensively. Data extraction, content analysis, and quality assessment of the literature were performed by two independent reviewers according to the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines using R and STATA software for single-arm meta-analysis.
    RESULTS: The total complication rate of the lumbar cortical bone trajectory technique was 6%, including a hardware complication rate of 2%, ASD (adjacent segment degeneration) rate of 1%, wound infection rate of 1%, dural damage rate of 1%, hematoma rate tending to 0%, fusion rate of 94%, and revision rate of 1%. Lumbar pedicle screw fixation techniques had a total complication rate of 9%, with a hardware complication rate of 2%, ASD rate of 3%, wound infection rate of 2%, dural damage rate of 1%, hematoma rate tending to 0%, fusion rate of 94%, and revision rate of 5%. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022354550.
    CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar cortical bone trajectory was associated with a lower total complication rate, ASD rate, wound infection rate, and revision rate than pedicle screw fixation. The cortical bone trajectory technique reduces the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications and can be an alternative in lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于接受机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(RARP)治疗的局限性前列腺癌患者,维持勃起功能是重要的生活质量问题。然而,现有的大多数研究都是回顾性的,本身就很薄弱,无法得出哪种NS方法对恢复患者功能最有效的结论.因此,我们使用不同的神经保留方法对RARP中的性功能结局进行了一致而客观的评估,以优化术后结局。根据PRISMA和STROBE陈述标准进行系统评价和荟萃分析。使用StataMP软件版本14进行统计分析。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表用于评估偏倚风险。该单臂荟萃分析包括3项随机对照试验和14项队列研究,共3756例患者。我们的荟萃分析发现,使用逆行方法的NS技术后,患者的最高有效率为0.86(0.78,0.93)。总的来说,RARPNS技术和结果之间存在显著差异,而优化结果的理想技术策略仍然存在争议。然而,人们对谨慎分离的重要性达成了共识,NVB的解剖,减少牵引和热损伤,保留前列腺周围的筋膜.我们仍然需要更多精心设计的随机对照试验,视频描述不同手术技术的细节,然后才能复制。
    Maintaining erectile function is an important quality of life issue for patients with localized prostate cancer treated with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). However, most existing studies are retrospective and inherently weak and cannot conclude which NS approach is most effective in restoring function in patients. We therefore performed a consistent and objective assessment of sexual function outcomes in RARP using different nerve-sparing methods to optimize postoperative outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed based on PRISMA and STROBE statement criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using StataMP software version 14. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias. This single-arm meta-analysis included 3 randomized controlled trials and 14 cohort studies with a total of 3756 patients. Our meta-analysis found that patients had the highest efficiency rate of 0.86 (0.78, 0.93) after the NS technique using the retrograde method. Overall, there are significant differences between RARP NS techniques and outcomes, and the ideal technical strategy to optimize outcomes remains controversial. However, there is consensus on the importance of careful separation, dissection of the NVB, reduction of traction and thermal injury, and preservation of the fascia around the prostate. We still need more well-designed randomized controlled trials with videos describing the details of the different surgical techniques before they can be replicated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    冠心病(CHD)患者的支架需要长期抗血小板治疗,因为支架血栓形成的可能性很高。正是在这种背景下,Cobra和CataniaPolyzene-F(PzF)支架均设计用于减少支架血栓形成(ST)的发生。在这项研究中,我们综述了PzF纳米涂层支架的安全性和有效性.
    该带有标题的系统综述已在PROSPERO(编号398781)中注册。纳入标准包括PzF纳米涂层冠状动脉支架患者的研究,并报告目标血管衰竭(TVF)和ST作为结果,排除标准是排除无法接受辅助药物治疗或没有必要终点的报告患者.有关PzF纳米涂层支架的报告在PubMed中进行了搜索,Embase,和WebofScience和其他来源。由于存在很少的报告和缺乏比较组,在R软件(v3.6.2)中进行了单臂荟萃分析,使用随机效应模型和通用逆方差方法。经过异质性测试,采用GRADE软件进行证据质量评价。进行漏斗图Egger测试以评估发表偏倚,并进行了敏感性分析,以确定总体效果的稳健性。
    纳入了1,768名受试者的6项研究。合并TVF率的主要终点为8.9%(95%CI7.5%-10.2%),其中包括合并心脏死亡(CD)率(1.5%,95%CI0%-3%),心肌梗死(MI)率(2.7%,95%CI0.4%-5.1%),靶血管血运重建(TVR)(4.8%,95%CI2.4%-7.2%),或靶病变血运重建(TLR)(5.2%,95%CI4.2%-6.4%),而次要终点ST为0.4%(95%CI0.1%-0.9%)。TVF的漏斗图,CD,TVR,TLR没有表现出任何严重的发表偏倚,和TVF,TVR,TLR在等级评估中显示出中等质量的证据。敏感性分析表明,TVF,TLR,和ST表现出良好的稳定性(I2=26.9%,16.4%,和35.5%,分别),而其他终点显示中度不稳定。
    这些数据表明,Cobra和Catania系统的PzF纳米涂层冠状动脉支架在临床应用中表现出良好的安全性和有效性。然而,纳入报告的患者样本量相对较小,如果将来有更多的研究发表,这项荟萃分析将会更新。
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.英国/PROSPERO/,标识符:CRD42023398781。
    UNASSIGNED: A stent for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) provides a requirement for a long-term antiplatelet therapy because of the high possibility of the development of stent thrombosis. It was against this background that both Cobra and Catania Polyzene-F (PzF) stents were designed to reduce the occurrence of stent thrombosis (ST). In this study, we review the safety and effectiveness of a PzF-nanocoated stent.
    UNASSIGNED: This systematic review with the title was registered in PROSPERO (No.398781). The inclusion criteria were including studies among patients with PzF-nanocoated coronary stents and reported target vessel failure (TVF) and ST as the outcomes, and the exclusion criteria were excluding reported patients who could not receive the adjunctive medical therapies or without the necessary endpoints. Reports about PzF-nanocoated stents were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science and other sources. Because of the existence of few reports and a lack of comparison groups, a single-arm meta-analysis was conducted in R software (v3.6.2), using a random-effects model with the generic inverse variance method. After a heterogeneity test, assessment of evidence quality was conducted by using GRADE software. A funnel plot Egger\'s test was performed to evaluate publication bias, and a sensitivity analysis was done to determine the robustness of the overall effects.
    UNASSIGNED: Six studies of 1,768 subjects were included. The primary endpoint that pooled the TVF rate was 8.9% (95% CI 7.5%-10.2%), which comprised the pooled cardiac death (CD) rate (1.5%, 95% CI 0%-3%), myocardial infarction (MI) rate (2.7%, 95% CI 0.4%-5.1%), target vessel revascularization (TVR) (4.8%, 95% CI 2.4%-7.2%), or target lesion revascularization (TLR) (5.2%, 95% CI 4.2%-6.4%), while the secondary endpoint ST was 0.4% (95% CI 0.1%-0.9%). The funnel plots of TVF, CD, TVR, and TLR did not show any serious publication bias, and TVF, TVR, and TLR showed evidence of moderate quality in GRADE assessment. The sensitivity analysis showed that TVF, TLR, and ST exhibited good stability (I 2 = 26.9%, 16.4%, and 35.5%, respectively), while the other endpoints showed moderate instability.
    UNASSIGNED: These data indicated that the PzF-nanocoated coronary stents of the Cobra and Catania systems demonstrated good safety and efficacy in clinical application. However, the sample size of patients included in the reports was relatively small, and this meta-analysis will be updated if more studies are published in the future.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42023398781.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号