single dose

单剂量
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:单剂量高剂量率近距离放射治疗(SD-HDR-BT)与2或3级HDRBT在中危和高危局部前列腺癌中进行了比较,中位随访时间为10年。
    方法:293例患者接受1×19Gy或1×20Gy(A组=49),2×13Gy(B组=138),或3×10.5Gy(组C=106)HDRBT。主要终点是生化无复发间隔(bRFI)。晚期泌尿生殖道(GU)和胃肠道(GI)发病率使用RTOG量表和国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)。免于生化复发(bRFI),总生存率(OS)和GU,使用Kaplan-Meier(K-M)方法和对数秩检验计算GI和IPSS的发病率。使用Cox的比例风险获得单变量和多变量风险比(HR)。
    结果:10年后,bRFI的K-M估计为64%(A组),72%(B组),76%(C组)(p=0.2)。OS无统计学差异。在多变量分析风险类别和ADT管理中,但不是剂量,是复发的显著预测因子(分别为p=0.0003和0.03)。十年后,GU3级事件为8%(A),2%(B)和13%(C);(p=0.01)。IPSS≥20为31%(A),20%(B)和23%(C);(p=0.6),A和B组的3级GI为0%,C组为2%;(p=0.3)。未观察到GU或GI4级事件。在多变量分析中,治疗前IPSS是失败的高度显著预测因子。
    结论:长期结局数据显示PSA对照组的差异降低,但无统计学意义。总体生存率没有差异,在SD-HDR-BT和HDR-BT的2或3个分数之间。
    BACKGROUND: Single-dose high-dose-rate brachytherapy (SD-HDR-BT) was compared to two or three fraction HDR BT in intermediate and high-risk localized prostate cancer with median follow-up of to 10 years.
    METHODS: 293 patients received 1 × 19Gy or 1 × 20Gy (Group A = 49), 2 × 13Gy (Group B = 138), or 3 × 10.5 Gy (Group C = 106) HDR BT. The primary endpoint was biochemical relapse-free interval (bRFI). Late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) morbidity used RTOG scales and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Freedom from biochemical relapse (bRFI), overall survival (OS) and GU, GI and IPSS morbidity were calculated using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method and log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate hazard ratios (HR) were obtained using Cox\'s proportional hazard.
    RESULTS: At 10 years, K-M estimates of bRFI were 64 % (Group A), 72 % (Group B), and 76 % (Group C) (p = 0.2). No statistically significant difference was seen in OS. In multivariate analysis risk-category and ADT administration, but not dose, were significant predictors of relapse (p = 0.0003 and 0.03, respectively). At ten years, GU grade 3 events were 8 % (A), 2 % (B) and 13 % (C); (p = 0.01). IPSS ≥ 20 was 31 % (A), 20 % (B) and 23 % (C); (p = 0.6) and grade 3 GI was 0 % in groups A and B and 2 % in C; (p = 0.3). No GU or GI grade-4 events were observed. Pre-treatment IPSS was highly significant predictor of failure in multivariate analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcome data show reduced but not statistically significant difference in PSA control, and no difference in overall survival, between SD-HDR-BT and 2 or 3 fractions of HDR-BT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    直到2005年,在一岁儿童中实施了单剂量疫苗,在阿根廷的儿科人群中,甲型肝炎病毒(HAV)约占急性肝炎病例的90%.然而,尽管疫苗接种成功,成人中仍有零星的HAV暴发。这项研究旨在评估阿根廷HAV的血清流行病学,分析大量人群中针对HAV的IgG和IgM抗体,接种疫苗和未接种疫苗。
    该研究包括2001年至2023年在医院就诊的16982名患者。该队列分为两组:2005年实施的疫苗接种计划未达到的16,638人和普遍疫苗接种覆盖的344名儿童。
    在56.7%的病例中检测到抗HAVIgG。2005年以后出生的人(77.7%)的比率明显高于以前出生的人(56.3%),p<0.001。19-40岁和41-60岁年龄组的抗HAVIgG发生率最低。另一方面,100/3956例(2.5%)怀疑急性肝炎的抗HAVIgM阳性。值得注意的是,这些都不是在强制性疫苗推出后出生的。
    对这一大型队列的研究有助于了解HAV的血清流行病学。尽管疫苗的实施实现了其主要目标,19至60岁的年龄段未达到达到群体免疫的估计阈值。这些发现揭示了针对疫苗接种运动的重要性,为公共卫生规划提供必要的见解,并指导阿根廷未来针对HAV的免疫策略。
    UNASSIGNED: Until 2005, when a single dose of vaccine was implemented in one-year-old children, the Hepatitis A virus (HAV) was responsible for approximately 90% of acute hepatitis cases in the paediatric population in Argentina. However, despite vaccination success, sporadic outbreaks of HAV still occur among adults. This study aimed to assess the seroepidemiology of HAV in Argentina, analysing IgG and IgM antibodies against HAV in a large population, both vaccinated and unvaccinated.
    UNASSIGNED: The study included 16,982 patients attending a hospital from 2001 to 2023. The cohort was divided into two groups: 16,638 individuals who were not reached by the vaccination program implemented in 2005 and 344 children who were covered by the universal vaccination.
    UNASSIGNED: Anti-HAV IgG was detected in 56.7% of cases. The rate was significantly higher in individuals born after 2005 (77.7%) compared to those born before (56.3%), p < 0.001. The age groups 19-40 and 41-60 years showed the anti-HAV IgG lowest rates. On the other hand, 100/3956 cases (2.5%) with suspected acute hepatitis were positive for Anti-HAVIgM. Notably, none of these were born after the mandatory vaccine rollout.
    UNASSIGNED: The study of this large cohort contributes to the understanding of the seroepidemiology of HAV. Although the implementation of the vaccine achieved its main goal, the age segment between 19 and 60 years does not reach the estimated threshold to achieve herd immunity. These findings reveal the importance of targeting vaccination campaigns, provide essential insights for public health planning, and guide future immunisation strategies against HAV in Argentina.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究的目的是研究接受单剂量甲氨蝶呤的输卵管异位妊娠患者在第0-4天之间β-hCG水平的升高是否对治疗成功具有预后价值。并研究在第4天服用第二剂是否能提高治疗成功率。
    方法:在开始甲氨蝶呤治疗后第4天诊断为异位妊娠并经历β-hCG水平升高的患者被纳入我们的研究。从2018年1月至2019年12月,对单剂量甲氨蝶呤(MTX)方案治疗至2019年12月的患者进行回顾性筛查。在第4天至2021年9月接受第二剂的患者从2020年1月至2021年9月进行前瞻性招募。第4次给药后β-hCG值下降超过15%被认为是治疗成功。
    结果:比较两组的治疗成功率。115例异位妊娠患者纳入研究。单剂量甲氨蝶呤方案应用于67名患者(第1组),而48例(第2组)应用了额外剂量的甲氨蝶呤。第1组40例患者(59.7%)和第2组39例患者(81.3%)的治疗成功。接受额外剂量甲氨蝶呤方案的患者的治疗成功率明显更高(p=0.014)。
    结论:这项研究表明,在第4天β-hCG增加的情况下,通过在第4天施加额外的MTX剂量可以提高成功率。
    BACKGROUND: This study\'s aim is to investigate whether the rise in β-hCG levels between days 0 and 4 in patients with tubal ectopic pregnancy who have received a single dose of methotrexate has prognostic value in treatment success, and to investigate whether administering a second dose on day 4 enhances treatment success.
    METHODS: Patients diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy and experiencing an increase in β- hCG levels on day 4 after initiation of methotrexate treatment were included in our study. Patients treated with a single dose Methotrexate (MTX) protocol until December 2019 were retrospectively screened from January 2018 to December 2019. Patients receiving a second dose on day 4 until September 2021 were prospectively enrolled from January 2020 to September 2021. A decrease of over 15 % in the β-hCG value after the 4th dose was considered as treatment success.
    RESULTS: Treatment success rates were compared between these two groups. 115 patients with ectopic pregnancy were included in the study. A single dose methotrexate protocol was applied in 67 of the patients (Group 1), while an additional dose methotrexate was applied in 48 (Group 2). The treatment was successful in 40 patients (59.7 %) in Group 1 and in 39 patients (81.3 %) in Group 2. The success rate of the treatment was significantly higher in patients who received an additional dose methotrexate protocol (p = 0.014).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that; it is possible to increase success rates by applying an additional MTX dose on the 4th day in cases with an increase in β-hCG on the 4th day.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的我们试图探索使用当前的共平面Halcyon环递送系统(RDS)与新型多叶准直器(MLC)孔径形状控制器通过立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)将30Gy的单次高剂量递送到孤立性肺病变的可行性。材料和方法先前使用非共面体积调节电弧疗法(VMAT)弧在TrueBeam(6MV-FFF)上通过SBRT对肺部病变进行了30Gy单剂量治疗的13名非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者匿名化并按照RTOG-0915单分数标准重新扫描到HalcyonRDS(6MV-FFF)上。Halcyon计划在使用用户定义的孔径形状控制器选项进行VMAT优化之前,利用了一种新颖的基于动态共形弧(DCA)的MLC拟合方法。临床TrueBeam和Halcyon计划通过其协议合规性进行比较,目标一致性,梯度指数,和对危险器官(OAR)的剂量。通过Halcyon的端到端质量保证(QA)测试和通过内部蒙特卡洛(MC)第二次检查验证的独立剂量验证来评估治疗交付的有效性和准确性。结果所有Halcyon肺SBRT计划均符合RTOG-0915协议对目标覆盖的要求,一致性,和梯度指数,和最大剂量2cm远离目标(D2cm),而在与临床TrueBeam计划相比时统计学上不显著(p>0.05)。此外,Halcyon提供了与OAR相似的剂量,除了肋骨,Halcyon的最大剂量较低(15.22Gyvs17.01Gy,p<0.001)。然而,Halcyon计划需要更高的总监控单元(8892MUvs7413MU,p<0.001),导致更高的波束调制因子(2.96MU/cGyvs2.47MU/cGy,p<0.001),并且开束时间增加了2.1倍(11.11分钟vs5.3分钟,p<0.005)。端到端QA测量表明Halcyon计划在临床上是可接受的,2%/2mm标准的平均伽马通过率为99.8%,独立的MC第二次检查在±2.86%之内。结论我们的端到端测试和验证研究表明,通过在VMAT优化之前利用基于DCA的MLC孔径形状控制器,Halcyon可用于递送单剂量的肺SBRT治疗。然而,HalcyonRDS的未来改进建议允许更高的输出率,旋转沙发校正,和一个集成的帧内运动管理系统,将进一步增强Halcyon对特定地点单剂量SBRT的能力。
    Purpose We sought to explore the feasibility of using the current co-planar Halcyon ring delivery system (RDS) with a novel multileaf collimator (MLC) aperture shape controller in delivering a single high dose of 30 Gy to solitary lung lesions via stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Materials and methods Thirteen non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients previously treated with a single dose of 30 Gy to lung lesions via SBRT on the TrueBeam (6MV-FFF) using non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) arcs were anonymized and replanned onto the Halcyon RDS (6MV-FFF) following RTOG-0915 single-fraction criteria. The Halcyon plans utilized a novel dynamic conformal arc (DCA)-based MLC-fitting approach before VMAT optimization with a user-defined aperture shape controller option. The clinical TrueBeam and Halcyon plans were compared via their protocol compliance, target conformity, gradient index, and dose to organs-at-risk (OAR). Treatment delivery efficacy and accuracy were assessed through end-to-end quality assurance (QA) tests on Halcyon and independent dose verification via in-house Monte Carlo (MC) second-check validation. Results All Halcyon lung SBRT plans met RTOG-0915 protocol\'s requirements for target coverage, conformity, and gradient indices, and maximum dose 2 cm away from the target (D2cm) while being statistically insignificant (p > 0.05) when compared to clinical TrueBeam plans. Additionally, Halcyon provided a similar dose to OAR except for the ribs, where Halcyon demonstrated a lower maximum dose (15.22 Gy vs 17.01 Gy, p < 0.001). However, Halcyon plans required a higher total monitor unit (8892 MU vs 7413 MU, p < 0.001), resulting in a higher beam modulation factor (2.96 MU/cGy vs 2.47 MU/cGy, p < 0.001) and an increase in beam-on time by a factor of 2.1 (11.11 min vs 5.3 min, p < 0.005). End-to-end QA measurements demonstrate that Halcyon plans were clinically acceptable with an average gamma passing rate of 99.8% for 2%/2mm criteria and independent MC 2nd checks within ±2.86%. Conclusion Our end-to-end testing and validation study demonstrates that by utilizing a DCA-based MLC aperture shape controller before VMAT optimization, Halcyon can be used for delivering a single dose of lung SBRT treatment. However, future improvements of Halcyon RDS are recommended to allow higher output rates, rotational couch corrections, and an integrated intrafraction motion management system that will further enhance Halcyon\'s capability for site-specific single dosage of SBRT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)广泛用于发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的初级预防。日本有两种G-CSF,即与聚乙二醇化学结合的G-CSF(PEGG-CSF),单剂量提供持久的效果,和非聚乙二醇结合的G-CSF(非PEGG-CSF),必须连续管理几天。
    方法:本研究通过对文献的系统回顾,研究了这些治疗对FN一级预防的效用。使用PubMed对相关研究进行了详细的文献检索,Ichushi-Web,还有Cochrane图书馆.数据由两名审阅者独立提取和评估。进行了定性分析或荟萃分析以评估六个结果。
    结果:通过第一次和第二次筛查,提取23和18篇文章进行定性综合和荟萃分析,分别。PEGG-CSF组的FN发生率明显低于非PEGG-CSF组,证据质量/确定性强。其他结果的差异,比如总体生存率,感染相关死亡率,中性粒细胞减少症的持续时间(小于500/μL),生活质量,和痛苦,不明显。
    结论:对于FN的一级预防,强烈建议单剂量PEGG-CSF治疗优于多剂量非PEGG-CSF治疗。
    BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely used for the primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia (FN). Two types of G-CSF are available in Japan, namely G-CSF chemically bound to polyethylene glycol (PEG G-CSF), which provides long-lasting effects with a single dose, and non-polyethylene glycol-bound G-CSF (non-PEG G-CSF), which must be sequentially administrated for several days.
    METHODS: This current study investigated the utility of these treatments for the primary prophylaxis of FN through a systematic review of the literature. A detailed literature search for related studies was performed using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library. Data were independently extracted and assessed by two reviewers. A qualitative analysis or meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate six outcomes.
    RESULTS: Through the first and second screenings, 23 and 18 articles were extracted for qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis, respectively. The incidence of FN was significantly lower in the PEG G-CSF group than in the non-PEG G-CSF group with a strong quality/certainty of evidence. The differences in other outcomes, such as overall survival, infection-related mortality, the duration of neutropenia (less than 500/μL), quality of life, and pain, were not apparent.
    CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of PEG G-CSF is strongly recommended over multiple-dose non-PEG G-CSF therapy for the primary prophylaxis of FN.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    背景:阴道念珠菌病(VC)通常影响孕妇。传统上,克霉唑阴道片(CLO)一直是管理的基石。然而,舍他康唑胚珠(SER)提供了一种新颖的局部抗真菌剂选择。这个双盲,随机试验评估了单剂量SER和CLO治疗妊娠期急性VC的疗效.
    方法:从2020年6月至2021年5月,这项试验招募了年龄≥18岁的孕妇,这些孕妇具有经显微镜检查证实的VC症状(阴道分泌物异常和/或外阴/阴道瘙痒)。前一年有≥4次VC发作的参与者,免疫受损状态,或咪唑禁忌症和在2周随访时缺席的患者被排除.参与者随机接受300mgSER或500mgCLO。初始用药后2周的评估包括临床治愈(所有症状的自我报告解决),显微治疗(假菌丝缺失),患者满意度,副作用,和临床治愈的时间。持续性VC的参与者每周接受SER剂量直至分娩。对复发和妊娠结局进行评估。
    结果:分析包括96名参与者(每组48名,平均年龄27.4±7.4岁,诊断时的胎龄22.9±6.4周)。没有统计学意义,SER取得了较高的临床治愈率(62.5%vs50%,p=0.217;平均差为12.5%,95CI:-17.5%至42.5%;比率为1.25,95CI:0.71至2.23)和较低的微观固化(47.9%与62.5%,p=0.151;平均差为-14.6%,95CI:-44.3%至15.1%;比率为0.77,95CI:0.43至1.37)。两组的临床治愈时间相当(SER:3.1±1.8天,CLO:3.4±2.7天;p=0.848)和实质性满意率(SER:66.7%,CLO:60.4%;p=0.753)。没有副作用的报道。在Siriraj医院分娩的60名参与者中,妊娠结局无显著差异.反复SER给药根除症状并提高显微治愈率。在1-2个月内,四名SER和两名CLO参与者观察到复发。
    结论:在妊娠期急性VC的治疗中,300mgSER和500mgCLO在临床和微观治愈率方面表现出可比的疗效,满意,副作用,临床治愈的时间,复发率,和妊娠结局。
    背景:TCTR20190308004(注册日期2019年3月8日)。
    BACKGROUND: Vaginal candidiasis (VC) commonly affects pregnant women. Traditionally, clotrimazole vaginal tablets (CLO) have been the cornerstone of management. However, sertaconazole ovules (SER) offer a novel topical antimycotic option. This double-blinded, randomized trial evaluated the efficacy of single-dose SER and CLO in treating acute VC during pregnancy.
    METHODS: From June 2020 to May 2021, this trial recruited pregnant women aged ≥ 18 years with VC symptoms (abnormal vaginal discharge and/or vulvar/vaginal itching) confirmed by microscopy. Participants with ≥ 4 VC episodes in the prior year, immunocompromised status, or imidazole contraindications and those who were absent at the 2-week follow-up were excluded. Participants were randomized to receive either 300 mg SER or 500 mg CLO. Evaluations 2 weeks after the initial medication administration included clinical cure (self-reported resolution of all symptoms), microscopic cure (pseudohyphal absence), patient satisfaction, side effects, and time to clinical cure. Participants with persistent VC received weekly SER doses until delivery. Assessments of recurrence and pregnancy outcomes were done.
    RESULTS: The analysis included 96 participants (48 per group, mean age 27.4 ± 7.4 years, gestational age at diagnosis 22.9 ± 6.4 weeks). Without statistical significance, SER achieved a higher clinical cure rate (62.5% vs 50%, p = 0.217; a mean difference of 12.5%, 95%CI: -17.5% to 42.5%; and a rate ratio of 1.25, 95%CI: 0.71 to 2.23) and a lower microscopic cure (47.9% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.151; a mean difference of -14.6%, 95%CI: -44.3% to 15.1%; and a rate ratio of 0.77, 95%CI: 0.43 to 1.37). The two groups had comparable times to clinical cure (SER: 3.1 ± 1.8 days, CLO: 3.4 ± 2.7 days; p = 0.848) and substantial satisfaction rates (SER: 66.7%, CLO: 60.4%; p = 0.753). No side effects were reported. Of 60 participants who gave birth at Siriraj Hospital, there were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes. Repeated SER dosing eradicated symptoms and enhanced the microscopic cure rate. Recurrence was observed in four SER and two CLO participants within 1-2 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of acute VC during pregnancy, 300 mg SER and 500 mg CLO exhibited comparable efficacy in terms of clinical and microscopic cure rates, satisfaction, side effects, time to clinical cure, recurrence rates, and pregnancy outcomes.
    BACKGROUND: TCTR20190308004 (registration date March 8, 2019).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对一群未婚女孩进行长期随访,两个,或三剂四价HPV疫苗,在10到18岁之间,在一项印度多中心研究中,我们可以比较接种疫苗后10年的年轻人和老年人群之间的抗体反应,并研究性活动开始和宫颈HPV感染对抗体水平的影响。在单剂量的年轻(10-14岁)接受者中,在疫苗接种后10年,97.7%和98.2%分别具有针对HPV16和HPV18的可检测的结合抗体滴度。在15-18岁接受单剂量的人群中,HPV16和HPV18的比例分别为92.3%和94.2%。在10-14岁接种疫苗的人群中,平均HPV16结合抗体滴度高2.1倍(95CI1.4至3.3),与未接种疫苗的妇女的平均滴度相比,在15-18年接种疫苗的妇女中高出1.9倍(95CI1.2至3.0)。与以前的36或48个月的时间点相比,抗HPV16的结合抗体和抗HPV16和HPV18的中和抗体在10年时显著升高.这种上升在15-18岁接种疫苗的参与者中更为明显。未观察到婚姻状况或宫颈HPV感染与滴度升高有关。单剂量受者抗体应答的耐久性与单剂量对持续性HPV16/18感染的高疗效相关,而与接种疫苗时的年龄无关。正如我们之前报道的那样。
    Long-term follow-up of a cohort of unmarried girls who received one, two, or three doses of quadrivalent HPV vaccine, between 10 and 18 years of age, in an Indian multi-centric study allowed us to compare antibody responses between the younger and older age cohorts at 10-years post-vaccination, and study the impact of initiation of sexual activity and cervical HPV infections on antibody levels. Among the younger (10-14 years) recipients of a single dose, 97.7% and 98.2% had detectable binding antibody titers against HPV 16 and HPV 18 respectively at ten years post-vaccination. The proportions among those receiving a single dose at age 15-18 years were 92.3% and 94.2% against HPV 16 and HPV 18 respectively. Mean HPV 16 binding antibody titers were 2.1 folds (95%CI 1.4 to 3.3) higher in those vaccinated at ages 10-14 years, and 1.9 folds (95%CI 1.2 to 3.0) higher in those vaccinated at 15-18 years compared to mean titers seen in the unvaccinated women. Compared to previous timepoints of 36 or 48 months, binding antibodies against HPV 16 and neutralizing antibodies against both HPV 16 and HPV 18 were significantly higher at 10 years. This rise was more pronounced in participants vaccinated at 15-18 years. No association of marital status or cervical HPV infections was observed with the rise in titer. Durability of antibody response in single dose recipients correlated well with the high efficacy of a single dose against persistent HPV 16/18 infections irrespective of age at vaccination, as we reported earlier.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    手术部位感染是常见且昂贵的感染,可导致死亡或患者预后不良。为了预防这些感染,使用抗生素预防。然而,抗生素的过度使用与更高的成本和抗生素耐药性的出现有关.
    本荟萃分析旨在比较单剂量与几种剂量抗生素在预防手术部位感染发展方面的有效性。
    PubMed被用于寻找临床试验,评估单剂量与几种剂量抗生素在避免手术部位感染发展方面的有效性。该研究包括1984年至2022年之间发表的试验。分析中纳入了74项临床试验。使用几率来比较具有95%置信区间的组。使用OR显示数据以生成森林图。使用ReviewManager(RevMan5.4版)进行荟萃分析。
    关于清洁操作,单剂量组5,634例患者中有389例手术部位感染(6.90%),多剂量组5,621例患者中有349例手术部位感染(6.21%)(OR=1.11,lowerCI=0.95,upperCI=1.30).关于清洁污染的操作,单剂量组2,715例患者中有137例手术部位感染(5.05%),多剂量组2,355例患者中有137例手术部位感染(5.82%)(OR=0.87,lowerCI=0.68,upperCI=1.11).关于受污染的操作,单剂量组3,262例患者中有302例手术部位感染(9.26%),多剂量组3,212例患者中有276例手术部位感染(8.59%)(OR=1.11,lowerCI=0.84,upperCI=1.47).总的来说,单剂量组11,611例患者中有828例手术部位感染(7.13%),多剂量组11,188例患者中有762例手术部位感染(6.81%)(OR=1.05,lowerCI=0.93,upperCI=1.20).组间差异不显著。
    本研究表明,使用单剂量抗菌药物预防与使用多剂量抗生素在减少手术部位感染方面同样有效。
    UNASSIGNED: Surgical site infections are common and expensive infections that can cause fatalities or poor patient outcomes. To prevent these infections, antibiotic prophylaxis is used. However, excessive antibiotic use is related to higher costs and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance.
    UNASSIGNED: The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of a single dosage versus several doses of antibiotics in preventing the development of surgical site infections.
    UNASSIGNED: PubMed was used to find clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of a single dosage versus several doses of antibiotics in avoiding the development of surgical site infections. The study included trials that were published between 1984 and 2022. Seventy-four clinical trials were included in the analysis. Odds ratios were used to compare groups with 95% confidence intervals. The data were displayed using OR to generate a forest plot. Review Manager (RevMan version 5.4) was used to do the meta-analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Regarding clean operations, there were 389 surgical site infections out of 5,634 patients in a single dose group (6.90%) and 349 surgical site infections out of 5,621 patients in multiple doses group (6.21%) (OR = 1.11, lower CI = 0.95, upper CI = 1.30). Regarding clean-contaminated operations, there were 137 surgical site infections out of 2,715 patients in a single dose group (5.05%) and 137 surgical site infections out of 2,355 patients in multiple doses group (5.82%) (OR = 0.87, lower CI = 0.68, upper CI = 1.11). Regarding contaminated operations, there were 302 surgical site infections out of 3,262 patients in a single dose group (9.26%) and 276 surgical site infections out of 3,212 patients in multiple doses group (8.59%) (OR = 1.11, lower CI = 0.84, upper CI = 1.47). In general, there were 828 surgical site infections out of 11,611 patients in a single dose group (7.13%) and 762 surgical site infections out of 11,188 patients in multiple doses group (6.81%) (OR = 1.05, lower CI = 0.93, upper CI = 1.20). The difference between groups was not significant.
    UNASSIGNED: The present study showed that using a single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis was equally effective as using multiple doses of antibiotics in decreasing surgical site infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:为了消除宫颈癌作为公共卫生问题,世界卫生组织建议在开始性行为前对青春期少女进行两剂人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗常规接种.然而,由于在婴儿免疫计划之外提供两剂疫苗的财政或后勤障碍,许多国家尚未实施HPV疫苗接种。
    方法:使用三个独立的HPV传播模型,我们估计了一剂量与两剂量HPV疫苗接种的长期健康益处和成本效益,在188个国家,与两剂相比,一剂疫苗的完全保护持续时间较短(20或30年)或终身保护,但疫苗效力较低(例如80%)。我们在2021-2120年期间以80%的覆盖率模拟了10岁女孩的9价HPV疫苗常规疫苗接种,并在第一年以80%的覆盖率进行了1年的追赶运动,直到14岁。
    结果:在2021-2120年期间,以80%的覆盖率进行的一剂疫苗接种预计将避免1.152亿(中位数范围:85.1-130.4)和1.468亿(114.1-161.6)宫颈癌,假设一剂疫苗可提供20年和30年的保护,分别。如果一剂疫苗在80%的疫苗效力下提供终身保护,可以预防1.478亿(140.6-169.7)宫颈癌病例。如果保护在20年后消失,另外65至889名女孩需要接种第二剂疫苗以预防宫颈癌,取决于该国的流行病学概况。在所有收入群体中,第二剂的门槛成本很低:从低收入国家的1.59(0.14-3.82)美元到高收入国家的44.83(3.75-85.64)美元,假设一剂给予30年的保护。
    结论:三个独立模型的结果是一致的,表明一剂疫苗接种与两剂疫苗接种方案具有相似的健康益处,同时简化了疫苗接种。降低成本,并缓解疫苗供应限制。如果一个剂量的保护持续时间较短,则第二剂量可能具有成本效益,更便宜的疫苗和疫苗接种策略,和宫颈癌的高负担。
    To eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem, the World Health Organization had recommended routine vaccination of adolescent girls with two doses of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine before sexual initiation. However, many countries have yet to implement HPV vaccination because of financial or logistical barriers to delivering two doses outside the infant immunisation programme.
    Using three independent HPV transmission models, we estimated the long-term health benefits and cost-effectiveness of one-dose versus two-dose HPV vaccination, in 188 countries, under scenarios in which one dose of the vaccine gives either a shorter duration of full protection (20 or 30 years) or lifelong protection but lower vaccine efficacy (e.g. 80%) compared to two doses. We simulated routine vaccination with the 9-valent HPV vaccine in 10-year-old girls at 80% coverage for the years 2021-2120, with a 1-year catch-up campaign up to age 14 at 80% coverage in the first year of the programme.
    Over the years 2021-2120, one-dose vaccination at 80% coverage was projected to avert 115.2 million (range of medians: 85.1-130.4) and 146.8 million (114.1-161.6) cervical cancers assuming one dose of the vaccine confers 20 and 30 years of protection, respectively. Should one dose of the vaccine provide lifelong protection at 80% vaccine efficacy, 147.8 million (140.6-169.7) cervical cancer cases could be prevented. If protection wanes after 20 years, 65 to 889 additional girls would need to be vaccinated with the second dose to prevent one cervical cancer, depending on the epidemiological profiles of the country. Across all income groups, the threshold cost for the second dose was low: from 1.59 (0.14-3.82) USD in low-income countries to 44.83 (3.75-85.64) USD in high-income countries, assuming one dose confers 30-year protection.
    Results were consistent across the three independent models and suggest that one-dose vaccination has similar health benefits to a two-dose programme while simplifying vaccine delivery, reducing costs, and alleviating vaccine supply constraints. The second dose may become cost-effective if there is a shorter duration of protection from one dose, cheaper vaccine and vaccination delivery strategies, and high burden of cervical cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:随着髋关节和膝关节骨性关节炎患病率的增加,总关节置换,终末期治疗,提供疼痛缓解和功能恢复,但通常与大量失血有关。据报道,氨甲环酸(TXA)可减少髋关节或膝关节置换术的围手术期失血量。然而,TXA给药的最佳剂量仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,结合了5项试验的数据,比较了1个固定剂量的1g静脉给药TXA和2个剂量的1g静脉给药用于髋关节或膝关节置换术的疗效和安全性.
    方法:PubMed,Medline,Embase,WebofScience,从2000年1月到2023年2月,搜索了Cochrane图书馆。我们的荟萃分析包括随机对照试验和队列研究,比较不同剂量的静脉TXA(IV-TXA)用于THA或TKA的疗效和安全性。观察终点包括总失血量,术后血红蛋白下降,输血率,住院时间,深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的发生率,和肺栓塞(PE)的发生率。根据Cochrane指南和PRISMA声明进行Meta分析。丹麦RevMan5.3软件用于数据合并。
    结果:涉及5542例患者的5项队列研究符合纳入标准。我们的荟萃分析表明,两组的总失血量明显更高(均差(MD)=-65.60,95%置信区间(CI)[-131.46,0.26],P=0.05);输血率(风险差(RD)=0.00,95%CI[-0.01,0.02],P=0.55);术后血红蛋白(MD=0.02,95%CI[-0.09,0.13],P=0.31);术后住院天数(MD=-0.13),95%CI[-0.35,0.09],P=0.25);DVT(RD=0.00,95%CI[-0.00,0.01],P=0.67);PE(RD=0.00,95%CI[-0.01,0.00],P=0.79)。由于每个主要研究的样本量差异,因此存在一些固有的异质性。
    结论:每次1剂1克和2剂1克IV-TXA对减少失血具有相似的效果,输血率,术后血红蛋白水平,TKA或THA术后住院时间,不增加术后并发症风险。对于血栓栓塞事件高风险的患者,在整个手术中1克TXA的剂量可能是优选的。然而,需要更高质量的RCT来探索最佳方案剂量,以推荐在全关节置换术中广泛使用TXA.试验注册我们进行了文献选择,资格标准评估,2023年3月16日在Prospero(CRD42023405387)注册的研究计划的数据提取和分析。
    OBJECTIVE: With the increasing prevalence of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee, total joint replacement, the end-stage treatment, provides pain relief and restoration of function, but is often associated with massive blood loss. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been reported to reduce perioperative blood loss in hip or knee arthroplasty. However, the optimal dose of TXA administration remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis combining data from 5 trials comparing the efficacy and safety of one fixed dose of 1 g intravenously administered TXA with two doses of 1 g each administered intravenously for hip or knee arthroplasty.
    METHODS: PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library were searched from January 2000 to February 2023. Our meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing the efficacy and safety of different doses of intravenous TXA (IV-TXA) for THA or TKA. The observation endpoints included total blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin drop, blood transfusion rate, length of hospital stay, incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE). Meta-analysis was performed according to Cochrane\'s guidelines and PRISMA statement. The Danish RevMan5.3 software was used for data merging.
    RESULTS: Five cohort studies involving 5542 patients met the inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis showed that the two groups were significantly higher in total blood loss (mean difference (MD) = - 65.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) [- 131.46, 0.26], P = 0.05); blood transfusion rate (risk difference (RD) = 0.00, 95% CI [- 0.01, 0.02], P = 0.55); postoperative hemoglobin (MD = 0.02, 95% CI [- 0.09, 0.13], P = 0.31); postoperative hospital stay days (MD = - 0.13), 95% CI [- 0.35, 0.09], P = 0.25); DVT (RD = 0.00, 95% CI [- 0.00, 0.01], P = 0.67); PE (RD = 0.00, 95% CI [- 0.01, 0.00], P = 0.79). There was some inherent heterogeneity due to variance in sample size across each major study.
    CONCLUSIONS: 1 dose of 1 g and 2 doses of 1 g IV-TXA each time have similar effects on reducing blood loss, blood transfusion rate, postoperative hemoglobin level, and postoperative hospital stay after TKA or THA, without increasing the risk of postoperative complications risk. For patients at high risk of thromboembolic events, one dose of 1 g TXA throughout surgery may be preferred. However, higher-quality RCT is needed to explore the optimal protocol dose to recommend the widespread use of TXA in total joint arthroplasty. Trial registration We conducted literature selection, eligibility criteria evaluation, data extraction and analysis on the research program registered in Prospero (CRD42023405387) on March 16, 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号