OBJECTIVE: To investigate factors associated with symptomatic urinary tract infection (sUTI) in persons with chronic spinal cord lesion (SCL) who were using single-use catheters for intermittent self-catheterization (ISC).
METHODS: Among respondents to an internet survey on the burden of illness on persons with SCL who were considered to be able to perform ISC, 111 persons using single-use catheters were included to examine factors associated with self-reported sUTI by univariate as well as multivariable analysis.
RESULTS: The incidence of sUTI was significantly higher in males than in females (56.9% vs. 31.6%, p = .011), persons with stocks of antibiotics than those without it (82.9% vs. 28.6%, p < .011), and persons with more frequent bleeding during catheterization than those with less frequent bleeding (100% vs. 46.5%, p = .036). The incidence did not significantly differ between respective groups when various variables were evaluated by other characteristics of the participants, adherence to ISC procedures, and complications. On multivariable analysis, male gender and stocks of antibiotics were significant independent factors for sUTI.
CONCLUSIONS: Male gender and stocks of antibiotics were associated with sUTI in persons with SCL who were performing ISC with single-use catheters.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the data comparing single- vs multi-use catheters for clean intermittent catheterisation (CIC), consider if the widespread use of single-use catheters is warranted given the cost and environmental impact, and put forth ideas for future consideration.
METHODS: A primary literature review was performed in PubMed over the past 50 years. Studies that performed comparative analysis of single- and multi-use catheters were included in our review. All studies that reported on primary data were narratively summarised.
RESULTS: A total of 11 studies were identified that reported on primary data comparing single- and multi-use catheters. There was no appreciable evidence suggesting reusable multi-use catheters were inferior to single-use catheters from an infection or usability standpoint. In addition, the environmental and monetary burden of single-use catheters is significant.
CONCLUSIONS: The intermittent catheter landscape in the USA has a complex past: defined by policy, shaped by industry, yet characterised by a paucity of data demonstrating superiority of single-use over multi-use catheters. We believe that the aversion to reusable catheters by many patients and healthcare professionals is unwarranted, especially given the cost and environmental impact. Moving forward, better comparative data and more sustainable practices are needed.