shared clinical decision-making

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:2019年,美国免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)将其16-23岁人群的脑膜炎球菌血清群B(MenB)疫苗接种建议从个人更新为共享临床决策(SCDM)。SCDM建议是基于个人的,并由患者和医疗保健提供者(HCP)之间的决策过程提供信息。16-23岁青少年的MenB疫苗接种仍然很低。我们检查了记录的对话,其中HCP与患者/护理人员之间进行了与MenB疫苗相关的讨论,以及更新后的SCDM建议后这些交互如何变化。方法:使用回顾性匿名对话数据(8/2015-9/2022)对HCPs与患者(16-23岁)/护理人员之间讨论MenB疫苗接种的记录进行分析。使用修改后的OPTION5框架测量共享决策强度。结果:在97个记录的对话中,平均持续时间为11.3分钟.在这些谈话中,对MenB疾病进行了0.25分钟的讨论(占总疫苗可预防疾病讨论中的38.9%),对MenB疫苗接种进行了1.36分钟的讨论(占总疫苗讨论中的60.9%),平均而言。HCP说出了78.8%的MenB疫苗相关单词,大多数(99.0%)发起了MenB疫苗接种讨论。在40.2%的录音中,HCP承认MenB疫苗没有提供明确的建议。HCP建议通常支持MenB疫苗接种(87.0%),建议在推荐后更改为SCDM的建议为21.4%。根据修改后的OPTION5框架,大多数记录未反映HCP与患者/护理人员之间的高度共同决策.结论:MenB疫苗接种的讨论很简短,共同决策的程度很低。对HCPs和患者/护理人员进行有针对性的教育可能会提高MenB疫苗接种意识,SCDM实施,和疫苗摄取。
    脑膜炎是一种严重且有时致命的疾病。在美国(US),疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)建议16-23岁的青少年接种脑膜炎球菌血清群B(MenB)疫苗,导致一种特殊类型的脑膜炎,称为侵袭性脑膜炎球菌病。截至2019年,CDC建议医疗保健提供者和患者或其护理人员就决定接种MenB疫苗进行共同的决策讨论。尽管有这些建议,在16-23岁的人群中,针对MenB的疫苗接种非常低。2022年,只有大约3/10的17岁儿童接种了MenB疫苗。我们研究了医疗保健提供者与患者或其护理人员之间的对话,其中包括对MenB疫苗接种的讨论。这些讨论在很大程度上是简短的,由医疗保健提供者领导。我们发现,医疗保健提供者最常提出的建议是支持他们的患者接种MenB疫苗。然而,我们还发现,医疗保健提供者错过了许多与患者或其护理人员进行这些关于MenB疫苗接种的共同决策讨论的机会.为患者提供教育和资源,看护者,医疗保健提供者专注于提高对MenB疫苗接种的认识,以及他们在共同决策讨论中可以发挥的作用,可能会导致更多的青少年和年轻人接种MenB疫苗。需要更多的研究来了解我们如何提高美国的MenB疫苗接种覆盖率。
    UNASSIGNED: In 2019, the United States Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) updated their meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccination recommendation for 16-‍23-year-olds from individual to shared clinical decision-making (SCDM). SCDM recommendations are individually based and informed by a decision process between patients and healthcare providers (HCPs). MenB vaccination among 16-23-year-olds remains low. We examined recorded conversations in which MenB vaccine-related discussions between HCPs and patients/caregivers took place, and how these interactions changed following the updated SCDM recommendation.
    UNASSIGNED: An analysis of recordings where MenB vaccination was discussed between HCPs and patients (16-‍23 years old)/caregivers was conducted using retrospective anonymized dialogue data (January 2015-October 2022). Shared decision-making strength was measured using a modified OPTION5 framework.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 97 included recorded conversations, the average duration was 11.3 min. Within these conversations, MenB disease was discussed for 0.25 min (38.9% of words in total vaccine-preventable diseases discussion) and MenB vaccination was discussed for 1.36 min (60.9% of words in total vaccine discussion), on average. HCPs spoke 78.8% of MenB vaccine-related words and most (99.0%) initiated the MenB vaccination discussion. In 40.2% of recordings, HCPs acknowledged the MenB vaccine without providing a clear recommendation. HCP recommendations often favored MenB vaccination (87.0%) and recommendations were 21.4% stronger post-recommendation change to SCDM. As measured by the modified OPTION5 framework, most recordings did not reflect a high degree of shared decision-making between HCPs and patients/caregivers.
    UNASSIGNED: MenB vaccination discussions were brief, and the degree of shared decision-making was low. Targeted education of HCPs and patients/caregivers may improve MenB vaccination awareness, SCDM implementation, and vaccine uptake.
    Meningitis is a serious and sometimes deadly disease. In the United States (US), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that 16–23-year-olds get vaccinated against meningococcal serogroup B (MenB), which causes a specific type of meningitis called invasive meningococcal disease. As of 2019, the CDC recommends that healthcare providers and patients or their caregivers have a shared decision-making discussion about deciding to get vaccinated against MenB. Despite these recommendations, vaccination against MenB among 16–23-year-olds is very low. Only about 3 in 10 17-year-olds had received the MenB vaccine in 2022. We studied conversations between healthcare providers and patients or their caregivers that included discussions of MenB vaccination. These discussions were largely brief and led by the healthcare providers. We found that healthcare providers most often made recommendations that were in favor of their patients getting vaccinated against MenB. However, we also found that healthcare providers missed many opportunities to have these shared decision-making discussions about MenB vaccination with patients or their caregivers. Providing education and resources for patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers focused on increasing awareness about MenB vaccination and the role they can play in having shared decision-making discussions may lead to more adolescents and young adults getting vaccinated against MenB. More research is needed to find out how we can improve MenB vaccination coverage in the US.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗可预防六种癌症。以前,该疫苗仅被批准用于9-26岁的儿童。然而,2018年10月,美国食品和药物管理局批准了针对27至45岁人群(中年)的HPV疫苗.目前的研究旨在评估美国27-45岁成年人的国家样本中的HPV疫苗接种。这项研究还评估了26岁后与HPV疫苗启动相关的因素。
    方法:使用2019年全国健康访谈调查对数据进行分析。该研究包括两个样本:(1)27-45岁的中年人(n=8556),和(2)自我报告在27~45岁范围内开始HPV疫苗接种的中年人和未接种疫苗的中年人(n=7307).结果变量是HPV疫苗接种状态和HPV疫苗启动。独立变量代表了安徒生卫生服务使用行为模型的结构。使用加权多变量逻辑回归模型估计HPV疫苗接种的几率。
    结果:总体而言,15.6%的人曾经接种过HPV疫苗,13.1%的人在26岁后开始接种首剂疫苗。西班牙裔(aOR=0.73;95%CI=0.58,0.92)和非西班牙裔亚洲人(aOR=0.59;95%CI=0.41,0.84)接种疫苗的几率低于非西班牙裔白人。女性(aOR=2.17;95%CI=1.42,3.32)在26岁后开始接种疫苗的几率高于男性。
    结论:共享临床决策的ACIP建议强调临床相互作用在HPV疫苗决策中的作用。研究结果强调需要进一步探索可能影响中年人HPV疫苗行为的背景因素。
    OBJECTIVE: The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine prevents six types of cancer. Previously, this vaccine was only approved for 9-26-year-olds. However, in October 2018 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the HPV vaccine for 27- to 45-year-olds (mid-adults). The current study aimed to assess HPV vaccination among a national sample of U.S adults aged 27-45 years. This study also assessed factors associated with HPV vaccine initiation after age 26.
    METHODS: Data were analyzed using the 2019 National Health Interview Survey. The study included two samples: (1) mid-adults aged 27-45 (n = 8556), and (2) mid-adults who self-reported they had initiated HPV vaccination within the 27-45 age range and those who were unvaccinated (n = 7307). The outcome variables were HPV vaccination status and HPV vaccine initiation. The independent variables represented constructs from Andersen\'s Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. The odds of HPV vaccination were estimated using weighted multivariable logistic regression models.
    RESULTS: Overall, 15.6% had ever received the HPV vaccine and 13.1% initiated their first dose of the vaccine after age 26. Hispanic (aOR = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.58, 0.92) and non-Hispanic Asian persons (aOR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.41, 0.84) had lower odds of ever receiving the vaccine than non-Hispanic White persons. Females (aOR = 2.17; 95% CI = 1.42, 3.32) had higher odds of initiating the vaccine after age 26 than males.
    CONCLUSIONS: The ACIP recommendation of shared clinical decision-making emphasizes the role of clinical interactions in HPV vaccine decision-making. Study findings highlight the need to further explore contextual factors that may influence HPV vaccine behavior among mid-adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)建议在共享临床决策(SCDM)下,对16-23岁的青少年和年轻成年人进行脑膜炎球菌血清群B(MenB)疫苗接种。然而,在美国(US),该人群的MenB疫苗接种覆盖率仍然很低。我们调查了意识,态度,在16-18岁的年龄较大的青少年父母和19-23岁的年轻人中,有关MenB疾病和疫苗接种的实践。
    2022年9月至10月,对年龄较大的青少年的父母和从美国患者小组招募的年轻人进行了一项在线调查。
    共有606名参与者,包括接种MenB疫苗(n=151)和未接种疫苗(n=154)的青少年的父母,以及接种MenB(n=150)和未接种疫苗(n=151)的年轻人。未接种疫苗的人群报告对MenB疾病(58.3-67.5%)和疫苗接种(49.7-61.0%)的认识较低,尽管未接种疫苗的父母的意识更高。然而,所有队列都报告了对了解更多有关MenB疾病和疫苗接种的兴趣.接种疫苗的队列依赖于初级保健提供者(PCP)来启动MenB疫苗接种对话,并且对SCDM的认知度较低,为35.1-45.3%,尽管了解SCDM的人更有可能参与决策。MenB疫苗接种的障碍包括缺乏PCP建议,疫苗副作用,以及对疫苗接种需求的不确定性。
    对MenB疾病的认识存在差距,疫苗接种,和SCDM在美国的父母和患者中,导致错过了讨论和管理MenB疫苗接种的机会。对MenB进行有针对性的教育和疫苗接种建议可能会增加这些机会,并提高MenB疫苗的认识和开始。
    MenB病,一种脑膜炎,是一种严重的危及生命的疾病。美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)建议16-23岁的年轻人在与他们的医疗保健提供者交谈并认为这是正确的选择后接种MenB疫苗。截至2021年,只有大约3/10的17岁儿童接种了MenB疫苗。在这项研究中,我们使用在线调查来了解年龄较大的青少年(16-18岁)和年轻人(19-23岁)的父母的意识,思想,以及与脑膜炎和MenB疫苗有关的实践。未接种疫苗的青少年的父母,和未接种疫苗的年轻人,对原因的认识较低,风险,和脑膜炎的症状,和MenB疫苗。此外,大多数父母认为脑膜炎的影响会很严重,与那些认为会不那么严重的年轻人相比。大多数参与者也没有意识到他们在决定他们或他们的孩子是否应该接种MenB疫苗方面的作用。然而,大多数人对了解更多脑膜炎和MenB疫苗表现出很高的兴趣。我们还发现,大多数确实接受了MenB疫苗的青少年和年轻人在与他们的医疗保健提供者讨论后就接受了它。这些发现显示了一个明确的机会来解决关于脑膜炎和MenB疫苗接种的认识和想法差距。为家长提供教育和资源,年轻人,和医疗保健提供者可以创造更多的机会来讨论MenB疫苗接种,并导致更多的青少年获得疫苗接种并受到保护免受脑膜炎。
    Meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccination is recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for adolescents and young adults 16-23-years-old under shared clinical decision-making (SCDM). However, MenB vaccination coverage in this population remains low in the United States (US). We investigated the awareness, attitudes, and practices regarding MenB disease and vaccination among parents of 16-18-year-old older adolescents and among 19-23-year-old young adults.
    An online survey was conducted in September-October 2022 among parents of older adolescents and among young adults recruited from a US-based patient panel.
    There were 606 total participants, including parents of MenB-vaccinated (n = 151) and non-vaccinated (n = 154) adolescents, and also MenB-vaccinated (n = 150) and non-vaccinated (n = 151) young adults. Non-vaccinated cohorts reported low awareness of MenB disease (58.3-67.5%) and vaccination (49.7-61.0%), though awareness was higher among non-vaccinated parents. However, all cohorts reported high interest in learning more about MenB disease and vaccination. Vaccinated cohorts relied on primary care providers (PCPs) to initiate MenB vaccination conversation and had a low awareness of SCDM at 35.1-45.3%, though those aware of SCDM were more likely to participate in decision-making. Barriers to MenB vaccination included lack of PCP recommendation, vaccine side effects, and uncertainty about vaccination need.
    There are gaps in awareness of MenB disease, vaccination, and SCDM among parents and patients in the US, resulting in missed opportunities for discussing and administering MenB vaccination. Targeted education on MenB and vaccination recommendations may increase these opportunities and improve MenB vaccination awareness and initiation.
    MenB disease, a type of meningitis, is a serious and life-threatening illness. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that 16–23-year-olds get a MenB vaccine after talking with their healthcare provider and deciding it is the right choice. As of 2021, only about 3 in 10 17-year-olds had received a MenB vaccine. In this study, we used an online survey to learn about parents of older teens’ (16–18-years-old) and young adults’ (19–23-years-old) awareness, thoughts, and practices related to meningitis and the MenB vaccine. Parents of non-vaccinated teens, and non-vaccinated young adults, had a lower awareness of the causes, risks, and symptoms of meningitis, and the MenB vaccine. In addition, most parents thought the impact of meningitis would be severe, compared with young adults who thought it would be less severe. Most participants were also not aware of their role in deciding if they or their child should be vaccinated against MenB. However, most showed a high interest in learning more about meningitis and the MenB vaccine. We also found that most teens and young adults who did receive the MenB vaccine received it right after talking about it with their healthcare provider. These findings show a clear opportunity to address gaps in awareness and thoughts about meningitis and MenB vaccination. Providing education and resources to parents, young adults, and healthcare providers could create more opportunities to discuss MenB vaccination and lead to more teens and young adults accessing vaccination and being protected against meningitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    在COVID-19大流行期间,人们越来越依赖社交媒体获取与健康相关的信息,在浏览我们指尖可用的大量信息方面提出了前所未有的挑战。社交媒体对影响个人的临床决策产生了重大影响,社区,和整个社会。在这次审查中,我们讨论了社交媒体在放大信息和错误信息中的作用,以及导致其依赖和流行的因素。我们回顾了医疗服务提供者如何受到这种不断变化的环境的影响,与办公室内患者相遇时采用的有用的沟通策略,以及我们如何积极利用社交媒体作为促进健康的工具,纠正错误信息,为未来的流行病做准备。
    The growing dependence on social media for health-related information boomed during the COVID-19 pandemic, posing unprecedented challenges in navigating the vast amounts of information available right at our fingertips. Social media had a major impact on clinical decision-making affecting individuals, communities, and societies at large. In this review, we discuss the role of social media in amplifying information and misinformation as well as factors contributing to its reliance and prevalence. We review how medical providers have been impacted by this changing landscape, useful communication strategies to employ with in-office patient encounters, and how we can be active players in using social media as a tool for health promotion, correcting misinformation, and preparing for future pandemics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    说明跨专业教育继续被强调为需要由认可高等教育专业学位课程的机构继续发展的领域。医疗保健专业人员团队需要更多地了解彼此,协作,并了解在急性或门诊护理环境中需要护理时对患者最重要的是什么。促进团队中与药剂师的临床共享决策和协作以及增加成员与患者之间的沟通的设置将减少医疗错误,增加患者安全,改善患者的生活质量。
    Description Interprofessional education continues to be emphasized as an area that needs to continue to grow by agencies that accredit higher education professional degree programs. Teams of healthcare professionals need to learn more about each other, collaborate, and understand what matters most to the patient when care is needed in an acute or ambulatory care setting. Settings that promote clinical shared decision-making and collaboration with pharmacists among the team and increase communication between members and the patient will decrease medical errors, increase patient safety, and improve the quality of life for the patient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)建议对未充分接种疫苗的27-45岁成年人进行HPV疫苗接种的共同临床决策(SCDM)。这项调查的目的是了解医生的知识,态度,以及该年龄组HPV疫苗接种的实践。
    方法:2021年6月对报告内科执业的医生进行了一项在线调查,家庭医学,或妇产科(每个实践专业的目标N=250),从由200万美国医疗保健提供者组成的小组中随机选择的潜在合格医生。
    结果:总计,753名医生参与了调查:33.3%的医生从事内科,33.1%从事家庭医学,33.6%的妇产科医生;62.5%为男性,平均医生年龄为52.7岁。尽管COVID-19大流行,每个执业专业中至少有三分之一的参与医师报告说,在过去12个月中,与27~45岁的患者进行了更多的HPV疫苗SCDM讨论.虽然大多数医生(79.7%)报告了解该年龄段成年人的SCDM建议,只有一半的医师正确回答了有关SCDM建议的客观知识问题.
    结论:研究结果表明,在HPV疫苗接种中存在与SCDM相关的医师知识空白。为了改善最有可能受益的人的HPV疫苗接种,增加决策辅助工具的可用性和使用以支持SCDM讨论可能有助于医疗保健提供者和患者共同做出关于HPV疫苗接种的最明智决策.
    The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends shared clinical decision-making (SCDM) regarding HPV vaccination for adults aged 27-45 years who are not adequately vaccinated. The objective of this survey was to understand physician knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding HPV vaccination in this age group.
    An online survey was administered in June 2021 to physicians who reported practicing internal medicine, family medicine, or obstetrics and gynecology (targeted N = 250 in each practice specialty), selected randomly from potentially eligible physicians from a panel of 2 million U.S. health care providers.
    In total, 753 physicians participated in the survey: 33.3% practiced internal medicine, 33.1% practiced family medicine, and 33.6% practiced obstetrics/gynecology; 62.5% were male and mean physician age was 52.7 years. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, at least a third of participating physicians in each practice specialty reported having more HPV vaccine SCDM discussions with patients aged 27-45 years in the past 12 months. While a majority of physicians (79.7%) reported being aware of the SCDM recommendation for adults in this age group, only half of physicians answered an objective knowledge question about SCDM recommendations correctly.
    Findings suggest that there are physician knowledge gaps related to SCDM for HPV vaccination. To improve access to HPV vaccination for people most likely to benefit, increasing availability and use of decision aids to support SCDM discussions might help healthcare providers and patients jointly make the most informed decisions about HPV vaccination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号