selfhood

自我
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们认为,当代“人”的概念化未能实现“以人为本的护理”的道德目标(PCC,由TomKitwood开发的痴呆症护理模型),并且它们对接受护理的人有害,他们的家人,和护理从业者。我们区分人格和自我,指出后者的连续性或维持是痴呆症护理的真正利害关系。然后我们演示我们的概念化,这是痴呆症患者生活经历的特权,并理解与照顾者和照顾环境相关的自我,最好抓住基特伍德的原始想法。这种概念化也足够灵活,适用于在痴呆症不同阶段照顾人们的做法。将这种概念化应用于PCC将最好地促进痴呆症患者的福祉,同时也鼓励照顾环境中的尊重和尊严。
    We argue that contemporary conceptualizations of \"persons\" have failed to achieve the moral goals of \"person-centred care\" (PCC, a model of dementia care developed by Tom Kitwood) and that they are detrimental to those receiving care, their families, and practitioners of care. We draw a distinction between personhood and selfhood, pointing out that continuity or maintenance of the latter is what is really at stake in dementia care. We then demonstrate how our conceptualization, which is one that privileges the lived experiences of people with dementia, and understands selfhood as formed relationally in connection with carers and the care environment, best captures Kitwood\'s original idea. This conceptualization is also flexible enough to be applicable to the practice of caring for people at different stages of their dementia. Application of this conceptualization into PCC will best promote the well-being of people with dementia, while also encouraging respect and dignity in the care environment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    青少年的自我意识对其心理健康具有重要意义。尽管工作了二十多年,学者们尚未在研究中积累证据来阐明自我在青少年心理健康中的作用。以自我的概念模型为基础,这项荟萃分析综述调查了自我的不同方面及其相关特征与抑郁和焦虑的关联强度,减弱或加剧这些关联的缓和因素,以及它们的因果影响。使用混合效果建模,其中包括来自298项研究的558个效应大小和来自39个国家的274370名青少年,我们的研究结果显示,青少年的自尊/自我概念[r=-0.518,p<0.0001;(95%CI-0.49~-0.547)]和自我同情[r=-0.455,p<0.0001;(95%CI-0.568~-0.343)]在他们与抑郁的关联中显示出最大效应.自尊/自我概念,自我同情,自我意识,自我效能感,自我调节与焦虑有类似的中度负相关性。元回归显示,青少年年龄和线人类型(父母对青少年)是重要的调节者。对因果影响的发现表明双向因果关系,特别是低自尊/自我概念,自我意识和自我效能感导致更高的抑郁,反之亦然。相比之下,不同的自我特征并未显示出与焦虑的特定因果方向。这些结果确定了与青少年心理健康功能有关的关键自我特征。我们讨论了我们的发现在如何推进青少年心理健康的自我理论方面的理论意义,以及建立自我作为培养心理健康心理技能的实际意义。
    Adolescents\' sense of self has important implications for their mental health. Despite more than two decades of work, scholars have yet to amass evidence across studies to elucidate the role of selfhood in the mental health of adolescents. Underpinned by the conceptual model of selfhood, this meta-analytic review investigated the strength of associations of different facets of selfhood and their associated traits with depression and anxiety, moderating factors that attenuate or exacerbate these associations, and their causal influences. Using mixed-effects modeling, which included 558 effect sizes from 298 studies and 274 370 adolescents from 39 countries, our findings revealed that adolescents\' self-esteem/self-concept [r = -0.518, p < 0.0001; (95% CI -0.49 to -0.547)] and self-compassion [r = -0.455, p < 0.0001; (95% CI -0.568 to -0.343)] demonstrating largest effect sizes in their associations with depression. Self-esteem/self-concept, self-compassion, self-awareness, self-efficacy, and self-regulation had similar moderate negative associations with anxiety. Meta-regressions revealed that adolescent age and type of informants (parents v. adolescents) were important moderators. Findings on causal influences indicated bidirectional causations, particularly low self-esteem/self-concept, self-awareness and self-efficacy drive higher depression and vice-versa. In contrast, the different self traits did not demonstrate specific causal direction with anxiety. These results pinpoint self traits that are pivotal in relating to adolescent mental health functioning. We discussed the theoretical implications of our findings in terms of how they advance theory of selfhood for adolescent mental health, and the practical implications of building selfhood as cultivating psychological skills for mental health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自我是社会构成和分布的吗?尽管这种观点最近得到了一些认知科学家的辩护,它在人类学和文化心理学中一直很受欢迎。而马塞尔·莫斯的旧文本,CliffordGeertz,HazelRoseMarkus,和北山修信经常对比西方的离散概念,有界,和具有非西方社会中心观念的个人自我,最近,人们普遍认为主观性是一种流动的交叉结构,从根本上是关系的,并受话语权力结构的制约。我评估了这些主张的合理性,并认为许多关于自我和主观性的讨论仍然太粗糙。由于未能区分自我的不同维度,许多作者无意间提倡一种激进的社会建构主义,这种建构主义不仅无法对第一人称体验公正,而且也无法捕捉到真实社区生活的异质性。
    Is selfhood socially constituted and distributed? Although the view has recently been defended by some cognitive scientists, it has long been popular within anthropology and cultural psychology. Whereas older texts by Marcel Mauss, Clifford Geertz, Hazel Rose Markus, and Shinobu Kitayama often contrast a Western conception of a discrete, bounded, and individual self with a non-Western sociocentric conception, it has more recently become common to argue that subjectivity is a fluid intersectional construction fundamentally relational and conditioned by discursive power structures. I assess the plausibility of these claims and argue that many of these discussions of self and subjectivity remain too crude. By failing to distinguish different dimension of selfhood, many authors unwittingly advocate a form of radical social constructivism that is not only incapable of doing justice to first-person experience but which also fails to capture the heterogeneity of real communal life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自我意识的改变通常被认为是痴呆症的重要心理症状。然而,自我不是一个统一的结构;它由一组紧密相连的,然而实质性的,可能不会同样受到痴呆症影响的表现。认识到自我的多维性质,当前的范围审查旨在探讨证明痴呆症患者心理自我变化的证据的性质和范围。采用认知心理学框架,回顾了105项定量和定性研究,发现被组织成三种主要类型的自我表现:高阶表现,自我的功能方面,和基础表现。总的来说,结果表明,尽管自我的某些不同表现有所改变,这些并不意味着全球性的自我丧失。尽管痴呆症期间发生了显著的认知变化,看来,自我的保留方面可能足以弥补某些自我过程的潜在削弱,例如自传回忆。更好地理解自我的改变是解决痴呆症患者心理症状的关键,比如感觉脱节和减少的机构,并可能为痴呆症护理干预提供新的途径。
    Alterations in one\'s sense of self are often considered a significant psychological symptom of dementia. However, the self is not a unified construct; it consists of a set of closely connected, yet substantive, manifestations which might not be equally impacted by dementia. Recognising the multidimensional nature of the self, the current scoping review aimed to explore the nature and scope of the evidence demonstrating change in the psychological self in people living with dementia. Adopting a cognitive psychological framework, a hundred and five (105) quantitative and qualitative studies were reviewed, and findings were organised into three main types of self-manifestations: high-order manifestations, functional aspects of the self, and foundational manifestations. Overall, the results show that although there are alterations in some of these different manifestations of the self, these do not imply a global loss of selfhood. Despite notable cognitive changes during dementia, it seems that preserved aspects of self may be enough to compensate for potential weakening of some self-processes such as autobiographical recall. Better understanding alterations in selfhood is key to addressing psychological symptoms of people living with dementia, such as feelings of disconnection and reduced agency, and may inform new pathways for dementia care interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    重度抑郁症是导致全球残疾的主要原因。人们对情绪障碍的记忆越来越感兴趣,因为它可能构成预防的原始工具,诊断,和治疗。MDD与受损的自传体记忆相关,其特征是过度笼统记忆,而不是生动的情节自我定义记忆,这是未来解决问题和预测的必要条件。这种记忆偏差是由三种机制维持的:反思,回避,和受损的执行控制。如果我们采取更广泛和全面的观点,我们可以假设所有这些改变都有可能损害自我身份更新。我们认为,此更新需要一个双重参考过程:(1)内在化的自我表示,以及(2)处理行动后果表示的外部化框架。根据该模型讨论了诊断和治疗意义,并强调了评估MDD中自传体记忆的重要性。本文分为:心理学>记忆心理学>脑功能和功能障碍神经科学>临床。
    Major depressive disorder is a leading global cause of disability. There is a growing interest for memory in mood disorders since it might constitute an original tool for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. MDD is associated with impaired autobiographical memory characterized by a tendency to overgeneral memory, rather than vivid episodic self-defining memory, which is mandatory for problem-solving and projection in the future. This memory bias is maintained by three mechanisms: ruminations, avoidance, and impaired executive control. If we adopt a broader and comprehensive perspective, we can hypothesize that all those alterations have the potential to impair self-identity updating. We posit that this update requires a double referencing process: (1) to internalized self-representation and (2) to an externalized framework dealing with the representation of the consequence of actions. Diagnostic and therapeutic implications are discussed in the light of this model and the importance of assessing autobiographical memory in MDD is highlighted. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Memory Psychology > Brain Function and Dysfunction Neuroscience > Clinical.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于意识障碍(DoC)患者,医学上备受推崇的政策建议几乎完全依赖于行为检查和对高阶认知的评估,在很大程度上无视患者的自我。之所以如此,是因为实际上建立自我意识或自我的存在比评估意识的存在更具挑战性。同时,建立DoC患者自我的潜力(实际的身体可能性)从临床上来说是至关重要的,伦理,和道德立场,因为自我是一个团结意图的独立和自由的代理人的最核心和私人证据,实施例,执行功能,注意,一般智力,情绪和主观内框架内的其他组成部分(第一人称给予)。自我意识的重新启动是脑损伤后恢复的第一步,这一观察进一步支持了自我的重要性。似乎可以在大脑思维功能的操作体系结构(OA)中合理地概念化复杂的经验自我,并通过定量脑电图(qEEG)操作同步可靠地进行测量。
    Medical well-regarded policy recommendations for patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) are almost exclusively relied on behavioural examination and evaluation of higher-order cognition, and largely disregard the patients\' self. This is so because practically establishing the presence of self-awareness or Selfhood is even more challenging than evaluating the presence of consciousness. At the same time, establishing the potential (actual physical possibility) of Selfhood in DoC patients is crucialy important from clinical, ethical, and moral standpoints because Selfhood is the most central and private evidence of being an independent and free agent that unites intention, embodiment, executive functions, attention, general intelligence, emotions and other components within the intra-subjective frame (first-person givenness). The importance of Selfhood is supported further by the observation that rebooting of self-awareness is the first step to recovery after brain damage. It seems that complex experiential Selfhood can be plausibly conceptualized within the Operational Architectonics (OA) of brain-mind functioning and reliably measured by quantitative electroencephalogram (qEEG) operational synchrony.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:最近一项荟萃分析和系统评价证实了基本自我紊乱是精神分裂症的一个中心特征。可以通过检查异常的自我体验(EASE)来系统地探索自我障碍的表现。在这项研究中,我们研究了EASE的阶乘结构,和EASE的诊断功效。我们假设EASE将具有单因子结构,因为基本自我的不稳定性将导致自我经验的多种变形,这些变形将作为统一格式塔的各个方面而有意义地相互关联。
    方法:在验证性因素分析框架(CFA)下分析了226名患有各种精神障碍的患者的EASE数据。计算总EASE值的接受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC),并获得了基于不同截止值预测精神分裂症谱系障碍的敏感性和特异性值。
    结果:CFA模型的拟合指数:RMSEA=0.036,SRMR=0.100,CFI=0.983,TLI=0.981。AUC值为0.946(95%置信区间:0.919-0.974)。对精神分裂症谱系障碍的敏感性和特异性很高。
    结论:我们的结果支持EASE表现出单因子结构和自我障碍作为精神分裂症谱系障碍的中心表型特征的概念。
    The idea that a disorder of the basic self is a central feature in schizophrenia has recently been corroborated in a meta-analysis and a systematic review. Manifestations of the self-disorder can be systematically explored with the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience (EASE). In this study, we examined the factorial structure of EASE, and diagnostic efficacy of EASE. We hypothesized that EASE will have a monofactorial structure as an instability of the basic self will result in multiple deformations of self-experience which would be meaningfully interrelated as aspects of a unifying Gestalt.
    EASE data for 226 patients suffering from various mental disorders were analyzed under a confirmatory factor analysis framework (CFA). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated for the total EASE sums, and sensitivity and specificity values for prediction of schizophrenia spectrum disorders based on different cut-offs were obtained.
    Fit indices for the CFA model: RMSEA = 0.036, SRMR = 0.100, CFI = 0.983, TLI = 0.981. The AUC value was 0.946 (95% confidence interval: 0.919-0.974). Sensitivity as well as specificity for schizophrenia spectrum disorders were high.
    Our results lend support for EASE exhibiting a monofactorial structure and the notion of self-disorders as a central phenotypic feature of schizophrenia spectrum disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    死亡,这曾经被认为是由生物功能停止发起的无法估量的另一个世界旅程,成为现代晚期社会政治调节的对象。安乐死,一种管理死亡和死亡的形式,伴随着争议而变得越来越受欢迎。仍在探索中的东西,然而,从专业的角度来看,在围绕安乐死的道德和伦理辩论中,自我概念赋予了不同的框架。通过对比利时安乐死领域的医生和其他关键专业人员的20次采访,这项研究发现,参与者之间的道德分歧在于与安乐死相关的不同自我属性,强调自治,社会,或体现的方面。本文证明了宗教在缓解死亡存在焦虑方面的作用正在减弱,加上越来越强调选择作为自我的基础,促进了当代控制自己灭亡的欲望。
    Death, which was once accepted as an incalculable otherworld journey initiated by the cessation of biological functions, became an object of socio-political regulation in late modernity. Euthanasia, a form of managing death and dying, has grown in popularity with accompanying controversy. What remains under-explored, however, are conceptions of selfhood animating different framings in moral and ethical debates around euthanasia from professional perspectives. Drawing on 20 interviews with physicians and other key professionals in the euthanasia field in Belgium, this study finds that moral division among participants lies in different attributes of selfhood related to euthanasia, which emphasize autonomous, social, or embodied aspects. This paper demonstrates that the diminishing role of religion in appeasing existential anxiety about death, combined with an increasing emphasis on choice as the basis of selfhood, facilitates the contemporary desire to control one\'s own demise.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    “以人为本的关怀”(PCC)这一短语提醒我们,关怀人们的基本哲学目标是维护或促进他们的人格。然而,这种想法已经转化为提倡个人主义的自治概念,消费主义和新自由主义背景下的赋权和个人责任,这在概念上和实践上都是有问题的。从概念的角度来看,它忽略了人类是社会的事实,历史和传记生物,而是假定一个本质主义或理想化的人格概念,其中一个人被视为一个单独的静态对象。从实际的角度来看,这种人格概念的应用会导致忽视一个人的基本护理需求,并加剧社会不平等的问题,特别是老年人和痴呆症患者。因此,我们认为,我们对PCC的理解必须基于一个动态的人格概念,将相关的社会,关系,时间和传记维度。我们建议PCC中正确的人格概念是将人理解为社会嵌入的概念,关系和时间扩展的主题,而不仅仅是个人,自治,非社会和临时物体。然后,我们提出了PCC的基本哲学目标的重新概念化,即促进自我而不是人格。这种重新概念化避免了困扰人格概念及其在PCC中的应用的问题,同时也为越来越多的强调社会心理的实证文献提供了哲学基础,关系,PCC的主观和传记维度。
    The phrase \'person-centred care\' (PCC) reminds us that the fundamental philosophical goal of caring for people is to uphold or promote their personhood. However, such an idea has translated into promoting individualist notions of autonomy, empowerment and personal responsibility in the context of consumerism and neoliberalism, which is problematic both conceptually and practically. From a conceptual standpoint, it ignores the fact that humans are social, historical and biographical beings, and instead assumes an essentialist or idealized concept of personhood in which a person is viewed as an individual static object. From a practical standpoint, the application of such a concept of personhood can lead to neglect of a person\'s fundamental care needs and exacerbate the problems of social inequity, in particular for older people and people with dementia. Therefore, we argue that our understanding of PCC must instead be based on a dynamic concept of personhood that integrates the relevant social, relational, temporal and biographical dimensions. We propose that the correct concept of personhood in PCC is one in which persons are understood as socially embedded, relational and temporally extended subjects rather than merely individual, autonomous, asocial and atemporal objects. We then present a reconceptualization of the fundamental philosophical goal of PCC as promoting selfhood rather than personhood. Such a reconceptualization avoids the problems that beset the concept of personhood and its application in PCC, while also providing a philosophical foundation for the growing body of empirical literature that emphasizes the psychosocial, relational, subjective and biographical dimensions of PCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:LSD是典型的迷幻剂。尽管5HT2a受体在其作用机制中具有明显的核心作用,对其显示亲和力和激动剂活性的其他受体的贡献仍不清楚.
    目的:我们采用受体富集的靶标功能连接分析(REACT)来探索与LSD-5HT1a的主要靶标分布相关的功能连接(FC)的差异,5HT1b,5HT2a,D1和D2受体。
    方法:我们对公开可用的数据集(N=15)进行了二次分析,以估计与这些系统相关的富含受体的FC图谱中LSD诱导的改变。主成分分析(PCA)被用作与意识状态改变(ASC)问卷捕获的LSD相关的主观体验的降维策略。探索了这些主要成分之间的相关性以及与受体富集的FC的主观效应的VAS评级。
    结果:与安慰剂相比,当分析富含每种主要的5-羟色胺能和多巴胺能受体时,LSD在FC中产生差异。改变的受体富集的FC显示与LSD对意识体验的主观影响有关,5-羟色胺能和多巴胺能系统分别主要与感知效果和感知自我以及认知相关。这些关系是分离的,不同的受体在内部表现出相同的关系,但不是之间,5-羟色胺能和多巴胺能系统。
    结论:这些探索性发现为LSD的药理学提供了新的见解,并强调需要进一步研究非5HT2a介导的机制。
    BACKGROUND: LSD is the prototypical psychedelic. Despite a clear central role of the 5HT2a receptor in its mechanism of action, the contributions of additional receptors for which it shows affinity and agonist activity remain unclear.
    OBJECTIVE: We employed receptor-enriched analysis of functional connectivity by targets (REACT) to explore differences in functional connectivity (FC) associated with the distributions of the primary targets of LSD-the 5HT1a, 5HT1b, 5HT2a, D1 and D2 receptors.
    METHODS: We performed secondary analyses of an openly available dataset (N = 15) to estimate the LSD-induced alterations in receptor-enriched FC maps associated with these systems. Principal component analysis (PCA) was employed as a dimension reduction strategy for subjective experiences associated with LSD captured by the Altered States of Consciousness (ASC) questionnaire. Correlations between these principal components as well as VAS ratings of subjective effects with receptor-enriched FC were explored.
    RESULTS: Compared to placebo, LSD produced differences in FC when the analysis was enriched with each of the primary serotonergic and dopaminergic receptors. Altered receptor-enriched FC showed relationships with the subjective effects of LSD on conscious experience, with serotonergic and dopaminergic systems being predominantly associated with perceptual effects and perceived selfhood as well as cognition respectively. These relationships were dissociable, with different receptors showing the same relationships within, but not between, the serotonergic and dopaminergic systems.
    CONCLUSIONS: These exploratory findings provide new insights into the pharmacology of LSD and highlight the need for additional investigation of non-5HT2a-mediated mechanisms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号