seizure duration

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:由于缺乏国际,基于证据的指导。我们旨在就PS的共识定义制定专家建议,SC,和治疗目标,以防止进展为更高水平的紧急情况,如癫痫持续状态(SE)。
    方法:专家工作组,由12位癫痫专家组成,神经学家,来自欧洲和北美的药理学家,使用改进的德尔菲共识方法来开发和匿名投票。共识被定义为≥75%的投票\“同意\”/\“强烈同意。
    结果:所有小组成员都强烈同意,在尽可能短的时间内终止正在进行的癫痫发作是快速和提前终止癫痫发作(REST)的主要目标,并且理想的REST药物将在给药后2分钟内开始起作用以终止正在进行的癫痫发作活动。在定义PS的术语上达成共识(建议的阈值为5分钟用于局灶性癫痫发作,2分钟用于长期缺席癫痫发作和双侧强直阵挛性癫痫发作的抽搐期)和SC(与单个患者的常规癫痫发作模式相比,癫痫发作频率异常增加)。所有小组成员都强烈同意或同意,应向患有PS的患者提供REST药物,所有经历过SC的患者均应接受急性集束化治疗(ACT).Further,当开REST药物或ACT时,癫痫发作行动计划应与患者和护理人员协商达成一致。
    结论:专家工作组就定义和管理PS和SC的建议达成了高度共识。这些建议将补充现行的急性癫痫发作管理指引,有可能更早地治疗它们,以避免进展为更严重的癫痫发作,包括SE。
    OBJECTIVE: The management of prolonged seizures (PS) and seizure clusters (SC) is impeded by the lack of international, evidence-based guidance. We aimed to develop expert recommendations regarding consensus definitions of PS, SC, and treatment goals to prevent progression to higher-level emergencies such as status epilepticus (SE).
    METHODS: An expert working group, comprising 12 epileptologists, neurologists, and pharmacologists from Europe and North America, used a modified Delphi consensus methodology to develop and anonymously vote on statements. Consensus was defined as ≥75% voting \"Agree\"/\"Strongly agree.\"
    RESULTS: All group members strongly agreed that termination of an ongoing seizure in as short a time as possible is the primary goal of rapid and early seizure termination (REST) and that an ideal medication for REST would start to act within 2 min of administration to terminate ongoing seizure activity. Consensus was reached on the terminology defining PS (with proposed thresholds of 5 min for prolonged focal seizures and 2 min for prolonged absence seizures and the convulsive phase of bilateral tonic-clonic seizures) and SC (an abnormal increase in seizure frequency compared with the individual patient\'s usual seizure pattern). All group members strongly agreed or agreed that patients who have experienced a PS should be offered a REST medication, and all patients who have experienced a SC should be offered an acute cluster treatment (ACT). Further, when prescribing a REST medication or ACT, a seizure action plan should be agreed upon in consultation with the patient and caregiver.
    CONCLUSIONS: The expert working group had a high level of agreement on the recommendations for defining and managing PS and SC. These recommendations will complement the existing guidance for the management of acute seizures, with the possibility of treating them earlier to potentially avoid progression to more severe seizures, including SE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究的目的是评估注射后癫痫发作持续时间对癫痫发作前脑灌注SPECT中癫痫发作起始区(SOZ)识别的影响。
    方法:对99mTc-HMPAO(n=140)或-ECD(n=36)进行了176次发作性SPECT。SPECT图像的视觉解释(连同单个MRI和统计高灌注图)关于侧向化(右,左,无)和本地化(时间,额叶,顶叶,SOZ的枕骨)由3位独立读者进行。读者之间的协议以Fleiss\'κ为特征。如果所有读者都同意右半球或左半球,则认为发作SPECT为“偏侧化”。如果它是横向化的,并且所有读者都同意同一半球内的同一叶,则被认为是“本地化”。通过ANOVA测试了注射潜伏期和注射后癫痫发作持续时间对侧向化/定位SPECT比例的影响,其中将注射潜伏期和注射后癫痫发作持续时间作为受试者之间的因素。
    结果:注射潜伏期和注射后癫痫发作持续时间的中位数[四分位距](全范围)分别为30[24,40](3-120)s和50[27,70](-20-660)s,分别。对于早期(<30s)注射和长时间(>50s)注射后癫痫发作持续时间的组合(κ=0.894,所有其他组合κ=0.659-0.734),SOZ侧向化的Fleissκ最大。关于Fleiss\'κ在141(80.1%)侧向SPECT中定位SOZ,早期注射和注射后持续时间短的癫痫发作最大(κ=0.575,所有其他组合κ=0.329-0.368)。TheproportionoflateralizationSPECTwaslowerwithshortcompositiontolongpost-injectionseaduration(estimatedmarginalmeans74.3%versus86.3%,p=0.047)。效果主要是由注射后癫痫发作持续时间非常短≤10s的病例(侧向治疗53.8%)驱动的。在考虑范围内的注射潜伏期对侧向化SPECT的比例没有显着影响(p=0.390)。在侧向化病例中,定位SPECT的比例不取决于注射潜伏期或注射后癫痫发作持续时间(p≥0.603)。
    结论:注射后癫痫发作持续时间短与发作性脑灌注SPECT中侧向化病例比例较低相关。
    BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the post-injection electrical seizure duration on the identification of the seizure onset zone (SOZ) in ictal brain perfusion SPECT in presurgical evaluation of drug-resistant epilepsy.
    METHODS: 176 ictal SPECT performed with 99mTc-HMPAO (n = 140) or -ECD (n = 36) were included retrospectively. Visual interpretation of the SPECT images (together with individual MRI and statistical hyperperfusion maps) with respect to lateralization (right, left, none) and localization (temporal, frontal, parietal, occipital) of the SOZ was performed by 3 independent readers. Between-readers agreement was characterized by Fleiss\' κ. An ictal SPECT was considered \"lateralizing\" if all readers agreed on right or left hemisphere. It was considered \"localizing\" if it was lateralizing and all readers agreed on the same lobe within the same hemisphere. The impact of injection latency and post-injection seizure duration on the proportion of lateralizing/localizing SPECT was tested by ANOVA with dichotomized (by the median) injection latency and post-injection seizure duration as between-subjects factors.
    RESULTS: Median [interquartile range] (full range) of injection latency and post-injection seizure duration were 30 [24, 40] (3-120) s and 50 [27, 70] (-20-660) s, respectively. Fleiss\' κ for lateralization of the SOZ was largest for the combination of early (< 30 s) injection and long (> 50 s) post-injection seizure duration (κ = 0.894, all other combinations κ = 0.659-0.734). Regarding Fleiss\' κ for localization of the SOZ in the 141 (80.1%) lateralizing SPECT, it was largest for early injection and short post-injection seizure duration (κ = 0.575, all other combinations κ = 0.329-0.368). The proportion of lateralizing SPECT was lower with short compared to long post-injection seizure duration (estimated marginal means 74.3% versus 86.3%, p = 0.047). The effect was mainly driven by cases with very short post-injection seizure duration ≤ 10 s (53.8% lateralizing). Injection latency in the considered range had no significant impact on the proportion of lateralizing SPECT (p = 0.390). The proportion of localizing SPECT among the lateralizing cases did not depend on injection latency or post-injection seizure duration (p ≥ 0.603).
    CONCLUSIONS: Short post-injection seizure duration is associated with a lower proportion of lateralizing cases in ictal brain perfusion SPECT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    相当比例的抑郁症患者对药物和精神治疗性抗抑郁治疗表现出抗性。电惊厥治疗(ECT)仍然是最有效的治疗方法之一,尤其是在急性期。在日常临床实践中,这通常伴随着药物治疗。已经表明,急性ECT治疗后的药物治疗可降低复发率。然而,很少研究各种抗抑郁药(AD)和抗精神病药(AP)在ECT过程中对效果的影响。
    在这项回顾性图表回顾研究中,我们检查了104例接受ECT治疗的抑郁症患者的数据.我们使用蒙哥马利-奥斯贝格抑郁量表(MADRS)分析了同时服用AD和AP或不服用精神药物对ECT疗效的影响。我们进一步分析了ADs安非他酮的影响,文拉法辛,和舍曲林或无AD以及阿立哌唑或喹硫平或奥氮平增强的影响。
    根据MADRS评分,精神药物对ECT的抗抑郁疗效没有影响。此外,抗抑郁药物或抗精神病药物之间的比较未显示任何显著差异.然而,我们发现根据患者在ECT期间接受的抗抑郁药物的不同,癫痫发作持续时间存在显著差异(p=.008).ECT治疗本身导致MADRS中13.3点的高度显著降低(p<.001)。
    放在一起,我们的研究强调,在进行电惊厥治疗的同时使用精神药物并不存在癫痫发作持续时间延长的风险,也不会降低ECT的有效性.据我们所知,这项研究是首次研究在进行ECT时使用抗抑郁药与抗精神病药联合治疗的效果。根据我们的结果,这种联合治疗是安全有效的。铭记药物抗抑郁作用的延迟和抗抑郁药物对预防复发的重要性,这项研究进一步支持了在ECT辅助治疗时应给予精神药物治疗的建议.
    UNASSIGNED: A significant proportion of patients with a depressive disorder show resistance to pharmacological and psychotherapeutic antidepressant treatments. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is still one of the most effective treatment methods, especially in the acute phase. In everyday clinical practice, this usually accompanies pharmacological treatment. It has been shown that pharmacological treatment following acute ECT treatment reduces the rate of relapses. However, the effect of various antidepressants (ADs) and antipsychotics (APs) on the effect during the course of ECT has rarely been investigated.
    UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective chart review study, the data of 104 depressive patients treated with ECT were examined. We analyzed the influence of concomitant administration of AD and AP or no psychotropic medication on the effect of ECT using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). We further analyzed the influence of the ADs Bupropion, Venlafaxine, and Sertraline or no AD and the influence of augmentation with Aripiprazole or Quetiapine or Olanzapine.
    UNASSIGNED: Psychotropic medication did not have an impact on antidepressant efficacy of ECT as measured with the MADRS scores. In addition, the comparison between the antidepressant or antipsychotic medications themselves did not show any significant difference. However, we found a significantly different seizure duration depending on the antidepressant substance that patients received during ECT (p = .008). ECT treatment itself led to a highly significant reduction of 13.3 points in the MADRS (p <.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Taken together, our study underlines that concomitant psychotropic medication while doing electroconvulsive therapy does not bare the risk of prolonged seizure duration or does it reduce the effectiveness of ECT. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the effect of treatment with antidepressants in combination with antipsychotics while doing ECT. In light of our results, this combination therapy is safe and effective. Bearing in mind the delay in onset of antidepressant action of medication and the importance of antidepressant medication for relapse prevention, this study further supports the recommendation that psychotropic medication should be given in adjunction to ECT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:前期症状可能是由于脑灌注不足,这可能是癫痫引起的血管收缩的结果。先前已显示,在大鼠和癫痫患者中,更长的癫痫发作会导致更严重的局部灌注不足。我们研究了电惊厥治疗(ECT)引起的全身性癫痫发作后的脑灌注及其与癫痫发作持续时间的关系。
    方法:纳入患有重度抑郁发作并接受ECT的患者。治疗期间,记录21通道连续脑电图(EEG)。在ECT病程之前(基线)和ECT诱发的癫痫发作后约1小时(后)进行动脉自旋标记磁共振成像扫描,以量化整体和区域灰质脑血流量(CBF)。根据脑电图上的癫痫样放电期评估癫痫发作持续时间。对健康对照进行两次扫描以评估测试-重测变异性。我们进行了假设驱动的贝叶斯分析,以研究全球和区域灌注变化与癫痫发作持续时间之间的关系。
    结果:纳入24名患者和27名健康对照。当前全球和区域CBF的变化与癫痫发作持续时间相关。在癫痫发作持续时间较长的患者中,CBF的全球下降值达到28mL/100g/min。CBF的区域性减少在额下回最为明显,扣带回,和脑岛(高达35毫升/100克/分钟)。在癫痫发作较短的患者中,全球和区域灌注增加(高达20mL/100g/min)。这些灌注变化大于健康对照中观察到的变化,全球CBF的最大中位数增加12mL/100g/min,全球CBF的最大中位数减少20mL/100g/min。
    结论:癫痫发作持续时间是决定术后灌注变化的关键因素。在未来的研究中,癫痫发作持续时间需要被认为是一个混杂因素,因为它对术后灌注有相反的作用.
    OBJECTIVE: Postictal symptoms may result from cerebral hypoperfusion, which is possibly a consequence of seizure-induced vasoconstriction. Longer seizures have previously been shown to cause more severe postictal hypoperfusion in rats and epilepsy patients. We studied cerebral perfusion after generalized seizures elicited by electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and its relation to seizure duration.
    METHODS: Patients with a major depressive episode who underwent ECT were included. During treatment, 21-channel continuous electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded. Arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging scans were acquired before the ECT course (baseline) and approximately 1 h after an ECT-induced seizure (postictal) to quantify global and regional gray matter cerebral blood flow (CBF). Seizure duration was assessed from the period of epileptiform discharges on the EEG. Healthy controls were scanned twice to assess test-retest variability. We performed hypothesis-driven Bayesian analyses to study the relation between global and regional perfusion changes and seizure duration.
    RESULTS: Twenty-four patients and 27 healthy controls were included. Changes in postictal global and regional CBF were correlated with seizure duration. In patients with longer seizure durations, global decrease in CBF reached values up to 28 mL/100 g/min. Regional reductions in CBF were most prominent in the inferior frontal gyrus, cingulate gyrus, and insula (up to 35 mL/100 g/min). In patients with shorter seizures, global and regional perfusion increased (up to 20 mL/100 g/min). These perfusion changes were larger than changes observed in healthy controls, with a maximum median global CBF increase of 12 mL/100 g/min and a maximum median global CBF decrease of 20 mL/100 g/min.
    CONCLUSIONS: Seizure duration is a key factor determining postictal perfusion changes. In future studies, seizure duration needs to be considered as a confounding factor due to its opposite effect on postictal perfusion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    电惊厥疗法(ECT)是一种广泛使用的治疗严重精神疾病,如精神分裂症,抑郁症,和躁狂症。该程序包括施加短暂的电刺激以诱发癫痫发作,麻醉用于确保镇静和肌肉放松。找到副作用最小的正确麻醉剂,特别是在癫痫发作持续时间上,对于最佳结果至关重要,因为癫痫发作持续时间是ECT有效性的重要因素,但是使用的麻醉剂会影响它。
    本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在汇集比较两种诱导剂的所有相关研究的结果,依托咪酯和异丙酚,运动和脑电图(EEG)癫痫发作持续时间的结果。
    在PubMed上进行了全面的文献检索,Medline,和Cochrane图书馆数据库来识别相关文章。主要结果指标是运动和脑电图癫痫发作持续时间。通过执行异质性来确保统计能力,出版偏见,敏感性分析,和亚组分析。计算连续结局的标准平均差和95%置信区间,并使用随机效应模型。
    本荟萃分析共纳入16项研究,包括7项随机对照试验(RCT),7个交叉试验,和2个队列。与异丙酚相比,依托咪酯的总体运动性癫痫发作持续时间在统计学上明显更长。与异丙酚相比,使用依托咪酯的EEG癫痫发作持续时间的总体结果也更长,并且具有统计学意义。此外,根据两个结局的研究设计进行分组,在这两个结果的队列亚组中显示出微不足道的结果,而RCT和交叉亚组支持总体结果。通过分组和敏感性分析评估异质性。
    我们的荟萃分析发现,在ECT中,依托咪酯在运动和脑电图发作持续时间方面优于异丙酚,暗示潜在的更好的疗效。因此,依托咪酯应被视为ECT的首选诱导剂,但需要更大的研究来进一步验证我们的发现.
    UNASSIGNED: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a widely used treatment for severe psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, depression, and mania. The procedure involves applying brief electrical stimulation to induce a seizure, and anesthesia is used to ensure sedation and muscle relaxation. Finding the right anesthetic agent with minimal side effects, especially on seizure duration, is crucial for optimal outcomes because seizure duration is an important factor in the effectiveness of ECT, but the anesthetic agents used can affect it.
    UNASSIGNED: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to pool the results of all relevant studies comparing the two induction agents, etomidate and propofol, for motor and electroencephalogram (EEG) seizure duration outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases to identify the relevant articles. The primary outcome measures were motor and EEG seizure durations. Statistical power was ensured by performing heterogeneity, publication bias, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis. Standard mean difference and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for continuous outcomes, and a random-effects model was used.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 16 studies were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 7 randomized control trials (RCTs), 7 crossover trials, and 2 cohorts. The overall motor seizure duration was statistically significantly longer with etomidate than with propofol. The overall result for EEG seizure duration was also longer with the use of etomidate over propofol and was statistically significant. In addition, subgrouping was performed based on the study design for both outcomes, which showed insignificant results in the cohort\'s subgroup for both outcomes, while the RCTs and crossover subgroups supported the overall results. Heterogeneity was assessed through subgrouping and sensitivity analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Our meta-analysis found that etomidate is superior to propofol in terms of motor and EEG seizure duration in ECT, implying potentially better efficacy. Hence, etomidate should be considered the preferred induction agent in ECT, but larger studies are needed to further validate our findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    目的:表征局灶性癫痫持续状态(SE)的癫痫发作持续时间和发作间隔。
    方法:我们回顾了因首次局灶性癫痫持续状态入院的成年患者的连续头皮脑电图记录。我们在第一次诊断性治疗前脑电图中确定了癫痫发作持续时间和癫痫发作间隔。我们还回顾了癫痫患者的孤立性局灶性自限性癫痫发作,作为癫痫发作持续时间的对照组。
    结果:我们记录了连续100次局灶性SE发作中的307次局灶性癫痫发作,42例癫痫患者的中位癫痫发作持续时间为107秒(IQR:54-186)和134例孤立的局灶性自限性癫痫发作,中位持续时间为59秒(IQR:30-90)(p<.001)。SE显着增加癫痫发作持续时间的唯一临床特征是急性症状性病因。在SE,15%和7%的癫痫发作持续时间超过300秒和600秒,(分别为强直阵挛性和局灶性SE的实际定义的t1),虽然只有1%的自限性癫痫发作持续时间超过300秒,没有一个持续超过600秒。对多次发作的SE发作间隔时间的分析表明,50%的发作间隔时间短于60秒,95%短于540秒(9分钟)。癫痫发作持续时间增加(最后一次与第一次)至少1.4倍的患者显示30天死亡率增加。
    结论:SE发作的局灶性癫痫发作表现出广泛的持续时间,部分与局灶性自限性癫痫发作的持续时间重叠,但中位持续时间较长。在50%的癫痫发作中,SE发作内的癫痫发作间隔时间短于1分钟,从未持续超过10分钟。最后,癫痫发作持续时间的增加可能代表更严重SE发作的“电生理生物标志物”,这可能需要更积极和快速的治疗。
    OBJECTIVE: To characterize the duration of seizures and inter-seizure intervals in focal status epilepticus (SE).
    METHODS: We reviewed consecutive scalp EEG recordings from adult patients who were admitted for a first episode of focal status epilepticus. We identified electrographic seizure duration and inter-seizure intervals in the first diagnostic pretreatment EEG. We also reviewed isolated focal self-limiting seizures in epilepsy patients, as a comparison group for seizure duration.
    RESULTS: We recorded 307 focal seizures in 100 consecutive focal SE episodes, with a median seizure duration of 107 s (IQR: 54-186), and 134 isolated focal self-limiting seizures in 42 epilepsy patients, with a median duration of 59 s (IQR: 30-90; p < .001). The only clinical feature of SE that significantly increased seizure duration was acute symptomatic etiology. In SE, 15% and 7% of seizures lasted longer than 300 and 600 s, respectively (t1 of the actual definition for tonic-clonic and focal SE), while only 1% of self-limiting seizures lasted longer than 300 s, and none lasted longer than 600 s. The analysis of inter-seizure intervals in SE with multiple seizures showed that 50% of the inter-seizure periods were shorter than 60 s, and 95% were shorter than 540 s (9 min). Patients who had an increase in seizure duration (last versus first) of at least 1.4 times showed an increased 30-day mortality.
    CONCLUSIONS: Focal seizures within a SE episode showed a wide range of duration, partly overlapping with the duration of focal self-limiting seizures but with a longer median duration. Inter-seizure intervals within an episode of SE were shorter than 1 min in 50% of the seizures and never lasted more than 10 min. Finally, an increase in seizure duration could represent an \"electrophysiological biomarker\" of a more severe SE episode, which may require more aggressive and rapid treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    海马(Hp)在无癫痫网络中的作用以及内源性大麻素系统对该网络的影响仍然是神秘的。这里,使用适应的非线性格兰杰因果关系,我们比较了四个间隔中网络强度的差异(基线或间期,预先发作,在服用三种不同剂量的内源性大麻素激动剂WIN55,212-2(WIN)或溶剂后两小时(时间1)和六小时(时间2、3和4)。在额叶(FC)的23只WAG/Rij大鼠中记录了8小时的局部场电位,顶叶PC),枕骨皮质(OC)和海马(Hp)。由专业神经生理学家在视觉上标记四个间隔,并在两个方向上计算电极对之间的耦合强度。Ictally,Hp和FC之间的耦合强度大大降低,以及PC和FC之间双向以及从FC和PC到OC单向大幅增加,从FC到Hp的所有时代。最高剂量的WIN在所有时间间隔内分别在4和2小时内增加了从FC到Hp和从OC到PC的耦合强度。并在第2个时期顺势降低了FC与PC的耦合强度。一只大鼠在最高剂量后表现出全身性惊厥性癫痫发作:这只大鼠不仅与其他相同条件下的大鼠共享耦合变化,但显示了更多。WIN在第2和第3时期减少了SWD数,在第3和第4时期增加了它们的平均持续时间。结论:在SWD过程中,FC和PC强耦合,驱动OC,同时Hp对FC的影响减弱。第一个是与皮层聚焦理论一致,后者表明海马参与了SWD的发生,并且皮质-丘脑-皮质系统的海马控制丢失。WIN会引起巨大的网络变化,从而对SWD的减少产生重大影响,惊厥性癫痫发作的发生,以及正常的皮质-皮质和皮质-海马相互作用。
    The role of the hippocampus (Hp) in absence epileptic networks and the effect of endocannabinoid system on this network remain enigmatic. Here, using adapted nonlinear Granger causality, we compared the differences in network strength in four intervals (baseline or interictal, preictal, ictal and postictal) in two hours before (Epoch 1) and six hours (epochs 2, 3 and 4) after the administration of three different doses of the endocannabinoid agonist WIN55,212-2 (WIN) or solvent. Local field potentials were recorded for eight hours in 23 WAG/Rij rats in the Frontal (FC), Parietal PC), Occipital Cortex (OC) and in the hippocampus (Hp). The four intervals were visually marked by an expert neurophysiologist and the strength of couplings between electrode pairs were calculated in both directions. Ictally, a strong decrease in coupling strength was found between Hp and FC, as well as a large increase bidirectionally between PC and FC and unidirectionally from FC and PC to OC, and from FC to Hp over all epochs. The highest dose of WIN increased the couplings strength from FC to Hp and from OC to PC during 4 and 2 hr respectively in all intervals, and decreased the FC to PC coupling strength postictally in epoch 2. A single rat showed generalized convulsive seizures after the highest dose: this rat shared not only coupling changes with the other rats in the same condition, but showed many more. WIN reduced SWD number in epoch 2 and 3, their mean duration increased in epochs 3 and 4. Conclusions:during SWDs FC and PC are strongly coupled and drive OC, while at the same time the influence of Hp to FC is diminished. The first is in agreement with the cortical focus theory, the latter demonstrates an involvement of the hippocampus in SWD occurrence and that ictally the hippocampal control of the cortico-thalamo-cortical system is lost. WIN causes dramatic network changes which have major consequences for the decrease of SWDs, the occurrence of convulsive seizures, and the normal cortico-cortical and cortico-hippocampal interactions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2015年,国际抗癫痫联盟提出了癫痫持续状态(SE)的新概念定义,具有两个操作维度(t1和t2),以指导急诊治疗。这项研究的目的是比较这两个不同时间点患者的临床特征和预后。
    方法:我们对连续诊断为SE的成年人进行了一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。如果出现惊厥性SE,t1为5分钟,t2为30分钟,而在意识受损的局灶性SE的情况下,t1为10分钟,t2是60min。临床特征数据,包括年龄,性别,既往癫痫发作史,神经影像学,符号学,持续时间,和SE的病因,被收集。主要结果是死亡率,以癫痫复发为次要指标,和功能状态作为SE发作后3个月纳入患者的三级结局。
    结果:我们筛选了100名SE患者,平均年龄66岁,61%为男性。56名(56.0%)患者达到SE的t1,44(44.0%)达到SE的t2。惊厥性SE(52.0%,n=52)比意识受损的局灶性SE更常见(48.0%,n=48)。继发于急性症状过程的癫痫持续状态是最常见的(50%,n=50)。符合SEt2的患者显示死亡风险显着增加(未调整分析-RR3.606,95CI1.552-8.376,p=0.003;调整分析-RR2.924,95CI1.221-7.003,p=0.016)和不利的功能状态(未调整分析-RR1.803,95CI1.280-2.539,p=0.001;调整分析-RR1.1.664,95CI1.184-2.340,达到SEt2的患者更有可能出现癫痫发作复发,然而,两组之间没有显著差异.
    结论:我们的研究为SE的新定义提供了有力的支持。与仅达到SE的t1的患者相比,达到SE的t2的患者往往具有显着增加的死亡风险和不利的功能结果。此外,患者在经历SE发作后可能出现癫痫发作复发.必须对医生进行有关SE的及时识别和适当管理的教育。
    BACKGROUND: In 2015, the International League Against Epilepsy proposed a new conceptual definition of status epilepticus (SE) with two operational dimensions (t1 and t2) to guide emergency treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients at these two different time points.
    METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive adults diagnosed with SE. In case of convulsive SE, t1 is 5 min and t2 is 30 min, whereas in case of focal SE with impaired consciousness, t1 is 10 min, t2 is 60 min. Data on clinical characteristics, including age, gender, history of prior seizures, neuroimaging, semiology, duration, and etiology of SE, were collected. The primary outcome was mortality, with seizure recurrence as a secondary measure, and functional status as tertiary outcome of enrolled patients at 3 months after SE onset.
    RESULTS: We screened one hundred patients with SE, with a median age of 66 years and 61% were male. Fifty-six (56.0%) patients reached t1 of SE, while 44 (44.0%) reached t2 of SE. Convulsive SE (52.0%, n = 52) was more common than focal SE with impaired consciousness (48.0%, n = 48). Status epilepticus secondary to an acute symptomatic process was the most common (50%, n = 50). Patients meeting t2 of SE demonstrated a remarkably increased risk of mortality (unadjusted analysis-RR 3.606, 95%CI 1.552-8.376, p = 0.003; adjusted analysis-RR 2.924, 95%CI 1.221-7.003, p = 0.016) and unfavorable functional status (unadjusted analysis-RR 1.803, 95%CI 1.280-2.539, p = 0.001; adjusted analysis-RR 1.664, 95%CI 1.184-2.340, p = 0.003) at 3 months compared to those who only reached t1 of SE. Patients reaching t2 of SE were more likely to experience seizure recurrence, however, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides strong support for the new definition of SE. Patients meeting t2 of SE tend to have a remarkably increased risk of mortality and unfavorable functional outcomes compared to those who only reached t1 of SE. Furthermore, patients were likely to experience seizure recurrence after undergoing an episode of SE. Physicians must be educated about prompt recognition and appropriate management of SE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    用于电惊厥治疗的许多麻醉药物具有抗惊厥特性,可能会影响电惊厥治疗的功效。通过这项研究,我们旨在提供有关依托咪酯和美索比妥对癫痫发作持续时间的影响的更多信息。我们探索诱导药物之间的关系,运动和脑电图癫痫发作持续时间。此外,我们研究了癫痫发作持续时间与治疗次数的关系.
    在这项回顾性研究中,我们从2005年到2016年的患者记录中收集了数据。纳入标准是使用依托咪酯和/或美索比妥和剂量记录,电惊厥治疗剂量和癫痫发作持续时间。排除标准是缺少任何一种诱导药物的数据,剂量或癫痫发作持续时间。
    对37例患者进行了分析。平均年龄为52岁,76%为女性。大多数患者患有情感障碍(81%)。在679和551例电惊厥治疗中分析了运动和脑电图癫痫发作持续时间,分别。与美索比妥相比,依托咪酯治疗下的运动和脑电图癫痫发作时间分别为7和13s,分别。此外,癫痫发作持续时间与治疗次数呈负相关,癫痫发作持续时间与电惊厥治疗剂量呈负相关.
    这项研究表明,与美索比妥相比,使用依托咪酯的运动和脑电图癫痫发作持续时间明显更长。因此,依托咪酯可能会增加电惊厥治疗的有效性。此外,我们观察到癫痫发作持续时间之间存在负相关,治疗次数和电休克治疗剂量。通过这项研究,我们为现有的文献做出了贡献,比较了美索比妥和依托咪酯作为电惊厥治疗的诱导剂。
    Many of the anaesthetic drugs used for electroconvulsive therapy have anticonvulsant properties and may influence efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy. With this study we aim to provide more information on the effect of etomidate and methohexital on seizure duration. We explore the relationship between induction drug, motor and electroencephalography seizure duration. Moreover, we study the relationship of seizure duration and number of therapies.
    In this retrospective study we collected data from patient records from 2005 until 2016. Inclusion criteria were the use of etomidate and/or methohexital and documentation of dosage, electroconvulsive therapy dosage and seizure duration. Exclusion criteria were missing data on either induction drug, dosage or seizure duration.
    Thirty seven patients were analysed. The mean age was 52 years and seventy six percent were female. Most patients were suffering from affective disorders (81%). Motor and electroencephalography seizure duration were analysed in 679 and 551 electroconvulsive therapies, respectively. Compared to methohexital, motor and electroencephalography seizures under etomidate were 7 and 13 s longer, respectively. Furthermore, there was a negative association between seizure duration and number of treatment and a negative association between seizure duration and electroconvulsive therapy dosage.
    This study demonstrates significant longer motor and electroencephalography seizure duration using etomidate compared to methohexital. Etomidate might therefore increase the effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy. Moreover, we observed a negative association between seizure duration, number of treatment and electroconvulsive therapy dosage. With this study we contribute to the available literature comparing methohexital and etomidate as induction agents for electroconvulsive therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Patients receiving mood stabilizers such as valproate (VAL) and carbamazepine (CMZP)/Oxcarbazepine (OX) may be referred for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The relative effects of these anticonvulsants on seizure threshold and seizure duration are unknown. We extracted data for a 20-month period from the medical records of patients who received bilateral ECT while on treatment with VAL (n=102) or CMZP/OX (n=31; 20 on CMZP, 11 on oxcarbazepine). Age-matched ECT-treated anticonvulsant-free patients (n=133) formed the control group. Seizure threshold in these patients had been determined by stimulus dose titration. The effect of VAL vs CMZP/OX on seizure threshold was examined using multivariable regression with adjustment for confounders. The mean (standard deviation) seizure threshold at the first ECT was highest in the CMZP/OX group (243.9 [106.1] mC), intermediate in the VAL group (177.7 [97.0] mC), and lowest in the control group (138.7 [86.0 Mc]). The regression model explained 37.5% of the variance in seizure threshold at the first ECT. Age, use of CMZP/OX, and anticonvulsant dose were each significantly associated with higher seizure threshold. CMZP/OX was associated with a higher initial ECT seizure threshold than VAL. ECT practitioners may prefer to start with a higher initial stimulus dose in patients receiving CMZP/OX or VAL, and more so for CMZP/OX than VAL, to avoid repeated sub-convulsive stimuli being administered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号