second-generation antipsychotics

第二代抗精神病药
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们报告了阿立哌唑治疗的最终结果,blonanserin,和来自日本精神分裂症有用药物治疗计划(JUMPs)的帕潘立酮,104周的自然主义研究.
    方法:JUMPs是一个开放标签,三臂,随机化,平行组,104周的研究。纳入年龄≥20岁的精神分裂症患者,需要抗精神病药物治疗或从以前的治疗中转换。主要终点是超过104周的治疗中止率。次要终点包括缓解率,个人和社会绩效(PSP)安全,阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS),和生活质量(QOL;EuroQol-5维度)。
    结果:总计,251例患者接受阿立哌唑(n=82),bronanserin(n=85),或帕潘立酮(n=84)。治疗停药率(阿立哌唑,80.5%;bronanserin,81.2%;帕利哌酮,71.4%)在104周时,治疗组之间没有显着差异(p=0.2385);观察到终点的可比较结果,包括缓解(42.9%,46.7%,和45.8%),PANSS,和安全。在整个队列中,而104周PSP总分的改善与基线无显著差异,与基线相比,在第104周观察到QOL和PANSS总分(包括所有分量表)显著改善(p<0.05).多变量分析发现,在转换为单一疗法之前,较短的疾病持续时间和较高的氯丙嗪等效抗精神病药剂量水平(≥1000mg)作为治疗中止的预测因素。
    结论:104周治疗结果在组间具有可比性;缓解率改善的总体趋势,安全,和QOL表明继续治疗的重要性。
    背景:UMIN-临床试验注册UMIN000007942(公开发布日期:14/05/2012)。
    BACKGROUND: We report the final results of treatment with aripiprazole, blonanserin, and paliperidone from the Japan Useful Medication Program for Schizophrenia (JUMPs), a 104-week naturalistic study.
    METHODS: JUMPs was an open-label, three-arm, randomized, parallel-group, 104-week study. Patients aged ≥ 20 years with schizophrenia requiring antipsychotic treatment or a switch from previous therapy were enrolled. The primary endpoint was treatment discontinuation rate over 104 weeks. Secondary endpoints included remission rate, Personal and Social Performance (PSP), safety, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and quality of life (QOL; EuroQol-5 dimension).
    RESULTS: In total, 251 patients received aripiprazole (n = 82), blonanserin (n = 85), or paliperidone (n = 84). Treatment discontinuation rates (aripiprazole, 80.5%; blonanserin, 81.2%; paliperidone, 71.4%) were not significantly different (p = 0.2385) among the treatment groups at 104 weeks; comparable outcomes were observed for endpoints, including remission (42.9%, 46.7%, and 45.8%), PANSS, and safety. In the overall cohort, while the improvement in the PSP total score at Week 104 was not significantly different from baseline, a significant improvement (p < 0.05) in QOL and total PANSS scores (including all subscales) was observed at Week 104 compared with baseline. Multivariable analysis identified a shorter disease duration and a higher chlorpromazine-equivalent antipsychotic dosage level (≥ 1000 mg) before switching to monotherapy as predictors of treatment discontinuation.
    CONCLUSIONS: The 104-week treatment outcomes were comparable between groups; the overall trend of improvement in remission rate, safety, and QOL suggests the importance of continued treatment.
    BACKGROUND: UMIN-Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000007942 (public release date: 14/05/2012).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种导致记忆丧失的神经退行性疾病,认知障碍,神经精神症状.第二代抗精神病药(SGAs)通常用于治疗这些神经精神症状,但其在AD患者中的安全性需要进一步研究.
    目的是通过使用美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库分析药物不良反应(ADR)来评估SGA在AD患者中的安全性。
    这项研究对2014年至2023年的FAERS数据进行了全面分析,重点是使用利培酮等SGA治疗的AD患者的ADR,喹硫平,奥氮平,氯氮平,和阿立哌唑.描述性的,不成比例,时间,使用贝叶斯置信度传播神经网络进行剂量分析,威布尔,和基于生理的药代动力学模型。
    在接受SGA治疗的1289例AD患者中,最常见的不良反应涉及神经系统,胃肠系统,和心脏疾病。不成比例分析确定了心脏,肾,和血管系统。喹硫平,利培酮,与氯氮平和阿立哌唑相比,奥氮平显示更多的阳性信号。时间分析显示心血管不良反应随机发生,而肾脏ADR随着长期使用而增加。剂量分析表明,小剂量的SGA并没有增加多心脏的风险,肾,或血管不良反应。
    这项研究强调了监测药品不良反应的重要性,特别是在心脏和肾脏系统中,在AD患者中使用SGAs时。未来的研究纳入更全面的临床数据是必要的,以支持安全和合理的药物利用。
    UNASSIGNED: Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative condition leading to memory loss, cognitive impairment, and neuropsychiatric symptoms. Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are commonly used to manage these neuropsychiatric symptoms, but their safety profile in patients with AD requires further investigation.
    UNASSIGNED: The objective was to evaluate the safety of SGAs in patients with AD by analyzing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.
    UNASSIGNED: This study conducted a comprehensive analysis of FAERS data from 2014 to 2023, focusing on ADRs in patients with AD treated with SGAs such as risperidone, quetiapine, olanzapine, clozapine, and aripiprazole. Descriptive, disproportionality, time, and dose analysis were performed using the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, Weibull, and physiologically based pharmacokinetic model.
    UNASSIGNED: Out of 1289 patients with AD treated with SGAs, the most common ADRs involved the nervous system, gastrointestinal system, and cardiac disorders. Disproportionality analysis identified significant positive signals in cardiac, renal, and vascular systems. Quetiapine, risperidone, and olanzapine showed more positive signals compared with clozapine and aripiprazole. Time analysis indicated that cardiovascular ADRs occurred randomly, whereas renal ADRs increased with prolonged use. Dose analysis suggested that small doses of SGAs did not elevate the risk of multiple cardiac, renal, or vascular ADRs.
    UNASSIGNED: The study underscores the importance of monitoring for ADRs, particularly in the cardiac and renal systems, when using SGAs in patients with AD. Future research incorporating more comprehensive clinical data is warranted to support safe and rational drug utilization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:第二代抗精神病药(SGAs)通常用于治疗精神分裂症(SCZ),但SGA可能在副作用的严重程度上有所不同。缺乏长期研究,以前的观察研究有局限性,如未能考虑混杂因素和随访持续时间短。
    目的:比较中国人群中7种SGA的长期人体测量和代谢副作用,使用受试者内部方法来降低混淆的风险。
    方法:我们收集了SGA处方的纵向数据,合并用药,空腹血糖(BG),脂质分布,和BMI在767名SCZ患者中,随访时间长达18.7年(中位数为6.2年)。共检索到192,152份处方记录,分析了27,723项代谢指标。线性混合模型用于估计SGA对BG的影响,血脂和BMI。除了研究SGA药物的效果(作为二元预测因子),我们还研究了SGA剂量对代谢谱的影响.
    结果:将SGA药物视为二元预测因子,氯氮平和奥氮平与血脂和BMI最显著恶化相关。仅使用氯氮平观察到BG的显着增加。Amisuluply,帕利哌酮和喹硫平与血脂状况恶化和BMI增加相关。相反,阿立哌唑与血脂谱的显著改善相关,但与BMI的小幅增加相关.当考虑SGA剂量时,该模型总体上显示出一致的结果.在最低有效剂量下,氯氮平与最严重的代谢副作用有关,其次是奥氮平。利培酮和阿立哌唑的代谢副作用最小,阿立哌唑与低脂显著相关。
    结论:本研究阐明了不同SGA对中国SCZ患者人体测量和代谢参数的长期和剂量依赖性影响。我们的发现可能会告知临床医生和SCZ患者SGA的选择。
    BACKGROUND: Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are commonly used to treat schizophrenia (SCZ), but SGAs may differ in the severity of side effects. Long-term studies are lacking, and previous observational studies have limitations, such as failure to account for confounding factors and short follow-up durations.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term anthropometric and metabolic side effects of seven SGAs in a Chinese population, using a within-subject approach to reduce the risk of confounding.
    METHODS: We collected longitudinal data of SGA prescriptions, concomitant medications, fasting blood glucose (BG), lipid profiles, and BMI in a cohort of 767 patients with SCZ, with follow-up lasting up to 18.7 years (median ∼6.2 years). A total of 192,152 prescription records were retrieved, with 27,723 metabolic measures analysed. Linear mixed models were used to estimate the effects of SGA on BG, lipid profiles and BMI. Besides studying the effects of SGA medications (as binary predictors), we also investigated the effects of SGA dosage on metabolic profiles.
    RESULTS: Considering SGA medications as binary predictors, clozapine and olanzapine were associated with the most substantial worsening of lipid profiles and BMI. A significant increase in BG was observed with clozapine only. Amisulpride, paliperidone and quetiapine were associated with worsened lipid profiles and increased BMI. Conversely, aripiprazole was associated with significant improvement in lipid profiles but a small increase in BMI. When SGA dosage was considered, the model showed consistent results overall. At the minimum effective dose, clozapine was associated with the most severe metabolic side effects, followed by olanzapine. Risperidone and aripiprazole showed the least metabolic side effects, with aripiprazole being significantly associated with lower lipids.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study clarified the long-term and dose-dependent effects of different SGAs on anthropometric and metabolic parameters in Chinese SCZ patients. Our findings may inform clinicians and SCZ patients of SGA choices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:抗精神病药物的致畸作用日益受到关注。先前评估抗精神病药物与先天性畸形(CMs)之间关联的研究得出了不同的结果,并且都来自西方国家。我们旨在研究与香港产前抗精神病药物暴露相关的主要和器官/系统特异性CMs的风险。
    方法:这项基于人群的研究从公共医疗保健服务数据库中确定了年龄在15-50岁之间在2003-2018年期间分娩第一个/单胎孩子的女性。进行了倾向评分(PS)加权逻辑回归分析,以检查妊娠早期暴露于抗精神病药(第二代和第一代抗精神病药;SGA和FGA)和六种最常用的个体抗精神病药的CM风险。
    结果:465,069名妇女,419和420在孕早期兑换≥1个SGA和FGA处方,分别。未暴露婴儿中任何CM的患病率为4.9%(95CI:4.9-5.0%),9.1%(6.7-12.3%)暴露于SGA的婴儿,FGA暴露婴儿为6.2%(4.3-9.0%)。SGA暴露(调整后的比值比:2.11[95CI:1.19-3.86])与CMs风险增加相关。这一发现与解决暴露错误分类和治疗适应症混淆的敏感性分析一致,但不与PS匹配的敏感性分析。在暴露于高剂量奥氮平(7.50[1.65-36.13])和高剂量喹硫平(15.03[4.86-56.72])的婴儿中观察到CMs风险升高,但有宽CI.器官/系统特异性畸形与SGA无关,FGA或个体抗精神病药。
    结论:我们观察到与SGA相关的重大畸形的风险略有增加,但在敏感性分析中并没有得到一致的肯定,排除坚定的结论。有必要进行大样本量的研究,以阐明个体抗精神病药物对特定畸形的比较安全性。
    BACKGROUND: There is growing concern regarding teratogenic effect of antipsychotics. Previous research assessing association between antipsychotics and congenital malformations (CMs) yielded mixed results and were all derived from Western countries. We aimed to examine risk of major and organ/system-specific CMs associated with prenatal antipsychotic exposure in Hong Kong.
    METHODS: This population-based study identified women aged 15-50 years who delivered their first/singleton child between 2003-2018 from public healthcare service database. Propensity score (PS)-weighted logistic-regression analyses were performed to examine risk of CMs following first-trimester exposure to antipsychotic classes (second- and first-generation antipsychotic; SGA and FGA) and six most frequently-prescribed individual antipsychotics.
    RESULTS: Of 465,069 women, 419 and 420 redeemed ≥1 prescription of SGA and FGA during first-trimester, respectively. Prevalence of any CMs was 4.9% (95%CI:4.9-5.0%) in unexposed-infants, 9.1% (6.7-12.3%) in SGA-exposed infants, and 6.2% (4.3-9.0%) in FGA-exposed infants. SGA exposure (adjusted-odds-ratio: 2.11 [95%CI:1.19-3.86]) was associated with increased risk of CMs. This finding was consistent with sensitivity analyses addressing exposure misclassification and confounding by treatment indication, but not with PS-matched sensitivity analysis. Elevated risk of CMs was observed in infants exposed to high-dose olanzapine (7.50 [1.65-36.13]) and high-dose quetiapine (15.03 [4.86-56.72]), but with wide-CIs. Organ/system-specific malformations were not associated with SGA, FGA or individual antipsychotics.
    CONCLUSIONS: We observed a small increased risk of major malformations associated with SGA, but was not consistently affirmed in sensitivity analyses, precluding firm conclusions. Research with large sample size clarifying comparative safety of individual antipsychotics on specific malformations is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:越来越多的研究已经评估了与情绪稳定相关的死亡风险,双相情感障碍(BD)的主要治疗方法。然而,现有数据大多仅限于自杀风险,专注于锂和丙戊酸,很少对潜在的混杂因素进行充分调整。这项研究旨在评估所有人的相对死亡风险,锂之间的自然和非自然原因,丙戊酸盐和三种常用的第二代抗精神病药(SGA),对重要混杂因素进行调整。
    方法:这项基于人群的队列研究确定了8137例首次诊断为BD的患者,暴露于锂的人(n=1028),丙戊酸盐(n=3580),奥氮平(n=797),2002年至2018年期间,喹硫平(n=1975)或利培酮(n=757)。数据是从香港公共医疗服务的全港医疗记录数据库中检索的。倾向评分(PS)加权方法用于优化控制潜在的混杂因素,包括预先存在的慢性身体疾病,物质/酒精使用障碍和其他精神药物。进行PS加权Cox比例风险回归评估所有风险,与每种情绪稳定剂相关的自然和非自然原因死亡率,与锂相比。通过限制以下患者进行三组敏感性分析:(i)累积暴露于指定情绪稳定剂的时间≥90天,其药物占有率(MPR)≥90%,(ii)指定的情绪稳定剂的MPR≥80%,其他研究的情绪稳定剂的MPR<20%和(iii)单一疗法。
    结果:每1000人年的全因死亡率发生率为5.9(95%置信区间[CI]:4.5-7.6),8.4(7.4-9.5),11.1(8.3-14.9),锂-7.4(6.0-9.2)和12.0(9.3-15.6),丙戊酸钠-,奥氮平-,喹硫平和利培酮治疗组,分别。奥氮平治疗的BD患者(PS加权风险比=2.07[95%CI:1.33-3.22])和利培酮(1.66[1.08-2.55])的全因死亡率明显高于锂治疗组。奥氮平与自然原因死亡风险增加相关(3.04[1.54-6.00]),利培酮与非自然原因死亡风险增加相关(3.33[1.62-6.86]),相对于锂。在敏感性分析中,一致确认了奥氮平与自然原因死亡率增加之间的关联。利培酮与非自然原因死亡率升高之间的关系在其他情绪稳定剂和单一疗法中仅限于低MPR的敏感性分析中变得不显著。丙戊酸和锂治疗组没有显示所有的显着差异,自然或非自然原因死亡风险。
    结论:我们的数据表明,奥氮平和利培酮比锂盐具有更高的死亡风险,并进一步支持临床指南推荐锂作为BD的一线情绪稳定剂。未来的研究需要进一步澄清与单个SGA药物相关的比较死亡率风险,以促进替代情绪稳定剂的风险收益评估,以最大程度地减少BD中可避免的过早死亡率。
    OBJECTIVE: Accumulating studies have assessed mortality risk associated with mood-stabilizers, the mainstay treatment for bipolar disorder (BD). However, existing data were mostly restricted to suicide risk, focused on lithium and valproate and rarely adequately adjusted for potential confounders. This study aimed to assess comparative mortality risk with all, natural and unnatural causes between lithium, valproate and three frequently prescribed second-generation antipsychotics (SGA), with adjustment for important confounders.
    METHODS: This population-based cohort study identified 8137 patients with first-diagnosed BD, who had exposed to lithium (n = 1028), valproate (n = 3580), olanzapine (n = 797), quetiapine (n = 1975) or risperidone (n = 757) between 2002 and 2018. Data were retrieved from territory-wide medical-record database of public healthcare services in Hong Kong. Propensity-score (PS)-weighting method was applied to optimize control for potential confounders including pre-existing chronic physical diseases, substance/alcohol use disorders and other psychotropic medications. PS-weighted Cox proportional-hazards regression was conducted to assess risk of all-, natural- and unnatural-cause mortality related to each mood-stabilizer, compared to lithium. Three sets of sensitivity analyses were conducted by restricting to patients with (i) length of cumulative exposure to specified mood-stabilizer ≥90 days and its medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥90%, (ii) MPR of specified mood-stabilizer ≥80% and MPR of other studied mood-stabilizers <20% and (iii) monotherapy.
    RESULTS: Incidence rates of all-cause mortality per 1000 person-years were 5.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.5-7.6), 8.4 (7.4-9.5), 11.1 (8.3-14.9), 7.4 (6.0-9.2) and 12.0 (9.3-15.6) for lithium-, valproate-, olanzapine-, quetiapine- and risperidone-treated groups, respectively. BD patients treated with olanzapine (PS-weighted hazard ratio = 2.07 [95% CI: 1.33-3.22]) and risperidone (1.66 [1.08-2.55]) had significantly higher all-cause mortality rate than lithium-treated group. Olanzapine was associated with increased risk of natural-cause mortality (3.04 [1.54-6.00]) and risperidone was related to elevated risk of unnatural-cause mortality (3.33 [1.62-6.86]), relative to lithium. The association between olanzapine and increased natural-cause mortality rate was consistently affirmed in sensitivity analyses. Relationship between risperidone and elevated unnatural-cause mortality became non-significant in sensitivity analyses restricted to low MPR in other mood-stabilizers and monotherapy. Valproate- and lithium-treated groups did not show significant differences in all-, natural- or unnatural-cause mortality risk.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that olanzapine and risperidone were associated with higher mortality risk than lithium, and further supported the clinical guidelines recommending lithium as the first-line mood-stabilizer for BD. Future research is required to further clarify comparative mortality risk associated with individual SGA agents to facilitate risk-benefit evaluation of alternative mood-stabilizers to minimize avoidable premature mortality in BD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    精神分裂症是一种严重的精神疾病,影响到世界人口的0.3-0.7%。它是一种经典的数量遗传病,受多种常见和罕见的遗传变异的影响。
    为了促进精神分裂症治疗的个性化和精准医学,我们通过使用MassARRAY飞行时间质谱对精神分裂症患者的一组相关基因进行基因分型,设计了一个程序.该程序在中国呼伦贝尔心理健康中心进行的一项观察性临床研究中进行了测试。在研究中,我们共招募了254例被诊断为精神分裂症的患者并进行了基因分型.基因分型结果用于生成报告,列出应放置16种包含的抗精神病药:“按照指示使用,\"\"慎用,\"或\"谨慎使用并经常监测血液浓度\"类别。72例患者完成24周随访观察,在8个时间点评估他们的PANSS评分.
    对于完成研究的所有受试者,PANSS得分大幅下降,显示治疗的有效性。在24周的研究中,药物治疗与基因检测结果一致(N=48)的患者的PANSS评分从84.3(SD=12.4)降至58.8(SD=15.3),24周后平均PANSS变化率达到56.1%。相比之下,基因检测报告为“谨慎使用”或“谨慎使用并经常进行血药浓度监测”(N=24)的患者的PANSS评分从81.1(SD=10.5)降至63.8(SD=10.1),平均PANSS变化率为37.6%。
    这项研究表明,我们基于药物基因组学的计划可能是一种合适且有效的工具,以促进精神分裂症治疗中的精确药物治疗。
    UNASSIGNED: Schizophrenia is a serious mental illness affecting 0.3-0.7% of the world\'s population. It is a classic quantitative genetic disease and is affected by a variety of common and rare genetic variants.
    UNASSIGNED: To facilitate personalized and precise medicine for schizophrenia treatment, we designed a program by genotyping a panel of related genes for schizophrenic patients using MassARRAY time-of-flight mass spectrometry. The program was tested in an observational clinical study conducted at the Hulunbuir Mental Health Center of China. In the study, a total of 254 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia were recruited and genotyped. The genotyping results were used to generate reports listing where the 16 included antipsychotics should be placed: \"Use as directed,\" \"Use with caution,\" or \"Use with caution and with frequent blood concentration monitoring\" categories. Seventy-two of the patients completed the 24-week follow-up observation, during which their PANSS scores were assessed at eight time points.
    UNASSIGNED: For all of the subjects who completed the study, the PANSS scores dropped significantly, showing the effectiveness of the treatment. During the 24-week study, PANSS scores of patients whose medications were consistent (N = 48) with their genetic test results dropped from 84.3 (SD = 12.4) to 58.8 (SD = 15.3), and average PANSS change rate reached 56.1% after 24 weeks. In contrast, PANSS scores of patients with genetic tests reported as \"Use with caution\" or \"Use with caution and with frequent blood concentration monitoring\" (N = 24) dropped from 81.1 (SD = 10.5) to 63.8 (SD = 10.1), and their average PANSS change rate was 37.6%.
    UNASSIGNED: This research indicates that our pharmacogenomic-based program could be a suitable and effective tool to facilitate precise medication in schizophrenia treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    越来越多的证据表明,第二代非典型抗精神病药(SGA)的治疗增加可能会改善对一线抗抑郁药反应不完全的重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的治疗结果。Cariprazine是最近批准的用于MDD增强的SGA。在这里,我们评估两个连续的(即,抑郁症状严重程度评分随时间的变化)和分类(即,缓解和缓解率)结果。经过全文审查,四项随机对照试验(RCTs)纳入我们的荟萃分析,同时纳入5项研究进行定性审查。计算所有纳入的随机对照研究的风险比(RR),以确定卡利拉嗪与安慰剂增强相比的相对反应和缓解率。全因脱落的RR也被确定为总体可接受性的代表。两项研究发现,使用卡利拉嗪增强剂的治疗反应具有统计学意义。一项研究观察到与安慰剂相比,卡利拉嗪的抑郁症状缓解。我们的随机效应模型揭示了卡利拉嗪的中度抗抑郁作用,蒙哥马利-奥斯贝格抑郁量表(MADRS)的标准化平均差(SMD)评分为-1.79(95%CI):-2.89,-0.69)。我们的合并反应RR和缓解RR计算为1.21(95%CI:1.05,1.39,P=0.008)和0.99(95%CI:0.84,1.17,P=0.91),分别。反应的RR有统计学意义(P<0.05)。然而,缓解期的RR无统计学意义.我们的荟萃分析的结果包括不同程度的影响。有证据表明卡利拉嗪可能是MDD的有效治疗方法;然而,需要进一步的结果来澄清这种关系。
    Converging evidence has suggested that treatment augmentation with a second-generation atypical antipsychotic (SGA) may improve treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients after an incomplete response to a first-line antidepressant. Cariprazine is a recently approved SGA for MDD augmentation. Herein, we evaluate both continuous (ie, change in depressive symptom severity scores over time) and categorical (ie, remission and response rates) outcomes. Following a full-text review, four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in our meta-analysis, while five studies were included for a qualitative review. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for all included randomized controlled studies to determine the relative response and remission rates of cariprazine compared to placebo augmentation. The RR for all-cause dropout was also determined as a proxy for overall acceptability. Two studies found a statistically significant treatment response using cariprazine augmentation. One study observed depressive symptom remission for cariprazine compared to placebo. Our random-effects model revealed moderate antidepressant effects of cariprazine, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores of -1.79 (95% CI): -2.89, -0.69). Our pooled response RR and remission RR were calculated as 1.21 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.39, P=0.008) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.84, 1.17, P=0.91), respectively. The RR for response was statistically significant (P<0.05). However, the RR for remission was not statistically significant. The findings from our meta-analysis include a variable magnitude of effects. Evidence suggests cariprazine may be an effective treatment for MDD; however, further results are needed to clarify this relation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全球,急性抗精神病药物中毒导致高发病率和死亡率。虽然锥体外系综合征通常相关,锥体外系综合征与抗精神病药中毒严重程度的关系尚未得到解决。因此,本研究旨在评估全球肌张力障碍评定量表(GDRS)作为急性抗精神病药物中毒的不良结局预测工具.一项横断面研究包括坦塔大学毒物控制中心收治的506名抗精神病药中毒患者,埃及,进行了三年多。典型抗精神病药中毒的平均GDRS为9.1±16.7,显着高于非典型抗精神病药(4.2±11.5)(p=0.003)。GDRS<20的患者对所有不良结局的责任明显更高(p<0.05)。然而,典型的抗精神病药物中毒与明显更多的心脏毒性相关(p=0.042),特别是延长的QRS(p=0.005),和重症监护病房(ICU)入院(p=0.000)。与PSS相反,未能预测研究的不良后果,GDRS显著预测了所有抗精神病药物世代的所有不良后果(p<0.000)。在非典型抗精神病药物中,GDRS超过三个准确预测的心脏毒性,QTc间期延长,和呼吸衰竭,曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.937、0.963和0.941。在典型的抗精神病药中毒中,在较高的截止时间(7.5、27.5、18和7.5),心脏毒性,QTc间期延长,准确预测呼吸衰竭(AUC分别为0.974、0.961和0.960)。GDRS是一个目标,量化肌张力障碍的重要工具,可用作急性抗精神病药中毒潜在毒性的早期可靠预测指标。
    Worldwide, acute antipsychotic poisoning results in high morbidities and mortalities. Though extrapyramidal syndromes are commonly associated, the extent of extrapyramidal syndromes in relation to the severity of antipsychotic poisoning has not been addressed yet. Thus, this study aimed to assess the Global Dystonia Rating Scale (GDRS) as an unfavorable outcomes predictive tool in acute antipsychotic poisoning. A cross-sectional study included 506 antipsychotic-poisoned patients admitted to Tanta University Poison Control Center, Egypt, over three years was conducted. The mean GDRS was 9.1 ± 16.7 in typical antipsychotic poisoning, which was significantly higher than that of atypical antipsychotics (4.2 ± 11.5) (p = 0.003). Patients with GDRS> 20 showed significantly higher liability for all adverse outcomes (p < 0.05). However, poisoning with typical antipsychotics was associated with significantly more cardiotoxicity (p = 0.042), particularly prolonged QRS (p = 0.005), and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (p = 0.000). In contrary to the PSS, which failed to predict the studied adverse outcomes, GDRS significantly predicted all adverse outcomes (p < 0.000) for all antipsychotic generations. In atypical antipsychotics, GDRS above three accurately predicted cardiotoxicities, prolonged QTc interval, and respiratory failure with Area under curves (AUC) of 0.937, 0.963, and 0.941, respectively. In typical antipsychotic poisoning, at higher cutoffs (7.5, 27.5, 18, and 7.5), cardiotoxicities, prolonged QTc interval, and respiratory failure were accurately predicted (AUC were 0.974, 0.961, and 0.960, respectively). GDRS is an objective, substantially useful tool that quantifies dystonia and can be used as an early reliable predictor of potential toxicity in acute antipsychotic poisoning.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    先前已经报道,在患有精神分裂症的患者中,当患者停止治疗时,长效可注射(LAI)抗精神病药物制剂与它们的口服等同物相比可以将复发时间延迟更长。没有答案的是,在接受维持治疗的双相情感障碍患者中是否会观察到相同的模式。进行了系统评价,以确定LAI抗精神病药在双相情感障碍维持治疗中的相关研究。采用安慰剂对照的随机戒断设计,并且在使用相应口服制剂的等效研究中也可用。我们发现了五项研究[一项阿立哌唑一水合物每月一次(AOM)研究,一项口服阿立哌唑(OARI)研究,两项为期2周的利培酮-LAI(RIS-LAI)研究,和一项口服帕潘立酮(OPAL)研究]。与OARI停药相比,中止AOM后2、4、6、8、12、16、20和26周的复发率明显较低。与停用OPAL相比,停用RIS-LAI后2、4、6、8和16周的复发率显著降低。这些结果可以解释为,在使用LAI抗精神病药或相应的口服抗精神病药稳定的躁狂症患者中,与口服等效药物相比,使用LAI抗精神病药制剂的复发时间大大延迟。
    It has been previously reported that among patients with schizophrenia that long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic formulations can delay time to relapse longer when compared to their oral equivalents when patients discontinue therapy. Unanswered is whether this same pattern would be observed for patients with bipolar disorder receiving maintenance treatment. A systematic review was undertaken to identify relevant studies of LAI antipsychotics in maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder, employing a placebo-controlled randomized withdrawal design, and where equivalent studies using the corresponding oral formulation were also available. We found five studies [one aripiprazole monohydrate once monthly (AOM) study, one oral aripiprazole (OARI) study, two 2 weeks risperidone-LAI (RIS-LAI) studies, and one oral paliperidone (OPAL) study]. Numerically lower recurrence rates at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26 weeks were observed when AOM was discontinued when compared with discontinuation from OARI. Numerically lower recurrence rates at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 16 weeks were observed when RIS-LAI was discontinued when compared with discontinuation from OPAL. These results can be interpreted as a substantial delay in time to recurrence with a LAI antipsychotics formulation compared to the oral equivalent when medication is discontinued in patients with mania who had been stabilized on LAI antipsychotics or corresponding oral antipsychotics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    第二代抗精神病药(SGAs)广泛用于治疗精神分裂症和相关疾病,还有其他精神障碍。然而,SGAs治疗其他精神障碍的有效性和安全性尚不清楚.系统的文献检索随机,从数据库开始到2022年4月3日,我们进行了11项SGA治疗除精神分裂症外的18种精神障碍的安慰剂对照试验.主要结果是不同精神障碍总分的平均变化。次要结果是反应的比值比(OR),缓解率和不良事件(AE)的风险比(RR)。共纳入181项研究(N=65,480)。与安慰剂相比,所有SGA在治疗其他精神障碍方面均显示出显着效果,除了自闭症和痴呆.阿立哌唑是治疗双相性躁狂[效应大小=-0.90,95%CI:-1.59,-0.21]和Tourette障碍[效应大小=-0.80,95%CI:-1.14,-0.45]的最有效治疗方法,奥氮平治疗双相抑郁[效应大小=-0.86,95%CI:-1.32,-0.39]和创伤后应激障碍[效应大小=-0.98,95%CI:-1.55,-0.41],lurasidone治疗抑郁症[效应大小=-0.66,95%CI:-0.82,-0.50],喹硫平治疗焦虑症[效应大小=-1.20,95%CI:-1.96,-0.43],睡眠障碍[效应大小=-1.2,95%CI:-1.97,-0.58],和谵妄[效应大小=-0.36,95%CI:-0.70,-0.03],和利培酮用于强迫症[效应大小=-2.37,95%CI:-3.25,-1.49],分别。为了安全,每个SGA的AE项目不同。有趣的是,我们发现OLZ的一些AE,QTP,RIS和PALI对某些症状有明显的缓解作用。在选择药物以及在特定患者的疗效和耐受性之间的平衡时,应考虑不同SGA治疗其他精神障碍的疗效和安全性的显着差异。
    Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are widely used in treating schizophrenia and related disorders, also other mental disorders. However, the efficacy and safety of SGAs for treating other mental disorders is unclear. A systematic literature search for randomized, placebo-controlled trials of 11 SGAs for treating 18 mental disorders apart from schizophrenia were carried out from database inception to April 3, 2022. The primary outcome was the mean change in the total score for different mental disorders. The secondary outcome was the odds ratio (OR) of response, remission rates and risk ratio (RR) of adverse events (AEs). A total of 181 studies (N = 65,480) were included. All SGAs showed significant effects in treating other mental disorders compared with placebo, except autistic disorder and dementia. Aripiprazole is the most effective treatment for bipolar mania [effect size = -0.90, 95% CI: -1.59, -0.21] and Tourette\'s disorder [effect size = -0.80, 95% CI: -1.14, -0.45], olanzapine for bipolar depression [effect size = -0.86, 95% CI: -1.32, -0.39] and post-traumatic stress disorder [effect size = -0.98, 95% CI: -1.55, -0.41], lurasidone for depression [effect size = -0.66, 95% CI: -0.82, -0.50], quetiapine for anxiety [effect size = -1.20, 95% CI: -1.96, -0.43], sleep disorders [effect size = -1.2, 95% CI: -1.97, -0.58], and delirium [effect size = -0.36, 95% CI: -0.70, -0.03], and risperidone for obsessive-compulsive disorder [effect size = -2.37, 95% CI: -3.25, -1.49], respectively. For safety, AE items for each SGAs was different. Interestingly, we found that some AEs of OLZ, QTP, RIS and PALI have significant palliative effects on some symptoms. Significant differences in the efficacy and safety of different SGAs for treatment of other mental disorders should be considered for choosing the drug and for the balance between efficacy and tolerability for the specific patient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号