search engines

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    物联网(IoT)和物联网(WoT)的革命为信息检索(IR)领域带来了新的机遇和挑战。互连物理对象的指数数量和实时数据采集需要用于IR系统的新方法和架构。研究和原型对于设计和开发新系统以及完善WoT中IR的架构至关重要。本文为WoT中的IR提出了一种统一的整体方法,叫做IR。哇哦.拟议的系统考虑了关键索引,得分,和演示阶段适用于一些智慧城市的用例和场景。总的来说,本文描述了研究,architecture,以及在WoT中推进IR领域的愿景,并解决了这个令人兴奋的领域中剩余的一些挑战和机遇。本文还介绍了设计注意事项,云实施,并基于具有技术效率措施的合成XML文档的模拟集合进行实验。实验结果表明,有希望的结果,而需要进一步的研究来改善IR。WoT有效性,考虑到WoT的动态特性,更重要的是,IR领域WoT建模方案的异质性和分歧性。
    The revolution of the Internet of Things (IoT) and the Web of Things (WoT) has brought new opportunities and challenges for the information retrieval (IR) field. The exponential number of interconnected physical objects and real-time data acquisition requires new approaches and architectures for IR systems. Research and prototypes can be crucial in designing and developing new systems and refining architectures for IR in the WoT. This paper proposes a unified and holistic approach for IR in the WoT, called IR.WoT. The proposed system contemplates the critical indexing, scoring, and presentation stages applied to some smart cities\' use cases and scenarios. Overall, this paper describes the research, architecture, and vision for advancing the field of IR in the WoT and addresses some of the remaining challenges and opportunities in this exciting area. The article also describes the design considerations, cloud implementation, and experimentation based on a simulated collection of synthetic XML documents with technical efficiency measures. The experimentation results show promising outcomes, whereas further studies are required to improve IR.WoT effectiveness, considering the WoT dynamic characteristics and, more importantly, the heterogeneity and divergence of WoT modeling proposals in the IR domain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    个人媒体表现中的内隐和明确的性别偏见早已存在。女性在性别中立的媒体内容中的代表性较低(代表性偏见),并且它们在图像中的面部与身体的比率通常较低(面部偏见)。在这篇文章中,我们关注搜索引擎图像结果中的代表性和面子主义。我们系统地查询了四个搜索引擎(谷歌,宾,百度,Yandex)来自三个地点,使用两个浏览器和两个波,与性别中立(人,聪明的人)和性别(女人,聪明的女人,男人,聪明人)术语,访问前100名图像结果。我们对个人的性别表达(女性/男性)进行了自动识别,并计算了所描绘的个人的面部与身体的比例。我们发现,和其他形式的媒体一样,搜索引擎图像延续偏见,损害女性利益,确认代表性和面子偏见的存在。针对性别偏见的深入算法去偏见已经过时了。
    Implicit and explicit gender biases in media representations of individuals have long existed. Women are less likely to be represented in gender-neutral media content (representation bias), and their face-to-body ratio in images is often lower (face-ism bias). In this article, we look at representativeness and face-ism in search engine image results. We systematically queried four search engines (Google, Bing, Baidu, Yandex) from three locations, using two browsers and in two waves, with gender-neutral (person, intelligent person) and gendered (woman, intelligent woman, man, intelligent man) terminology, accessing the top 100 image results. We employed automatic identification for the individual\'s gender expression (female/male) and the calculation of the face-to-body ratio of individuals depicted. We find that, as in other forms of media, search engine images perpetuate biases to the detriment of women, confirming the existence of the representation and face-ism biases. In-depth algorithmic debiasing with a specific focus on gender bias is overdue.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人们在关键环境中依赖搜索引擎获取信息,比如突发公共卫生事件——但是是什么让人们比其他搜索结果更信任某些搜索结果呢?搜索引擎可以通过控制信息的呈现方式来影响人们的信任水平吗?错误信息的存在如何影响人们的信任?研究已经确定了排名和错误信息的存在是影响人们搜索行为的因素。这里,我们通过测量这些因素的影响来扩展这些发现,以及错误信息警告横幅,关于单个搜索结果的感知可信度。我们使用Covid-19相关查询进行了三个在线实验(N=3196),并发现,尽管排名较高的结果被更频繁地点击,他们没有更多的信任。我们还表明,错误信息不会损害对下面显示的准确结果的信任。相比之下,虽然关于不可靠来源的警告可能会降低对错误信息的信任,它大大降低了对准确信息的信任。这项研究缓解了人们对如何评估他们在网上找到的信息的可信度的一些担忧,同时揭示了一种错误信息预防方法的潜在适得其反的影响;即关于来源不可靠性的横幅警告可能会导致意想不到的非最佳结果,人们对准确信息的信任减少。
    People rely on search engines for information in critical contexts, such as public health emergencies-but what makes people trust some search results more than others? Can search engines influence people\'s levels of trust by controlling how information is presented? And, how does the presence of misinformation influence people\'s trust? Research has identified both rank and the presence of misinformation as factors impacting people\'s search behavior. Here, we extend these findings by measuring the effects of these factors, as well as misinformation warning banners, on the perceived trustworthiness of individual search results. We conducted three online experiments (N = 3196) using Covid-19-related queries, and found that although higher-ranked results are clicked more often, they are not more trusted. We also showed that misinformation does not damage trust in accurate results displayed below it. In contrast, while a warning about unreliable sources might decrease trust in misinformation, it significantly decreases trust in accurate information. This research alleviates some concerns about how people evaluate the credibility of information they find online, while revealing a potential backfire effect of one misinformation-prevention approach; namely, that banner warnings about source unreliability could lead to unexpected and nonoptimal outcomes in which people trust accurate information less.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在线药房市场正在增长,合法的网上药店提供便利和可访问性等优势。然而,这种增加的需求吸引了恶意行为者进入这个领域,导致非法供应商的扩散,这些供应商使用欺骗性技术在搜索结果中排名更高,并通过分发不合格或伪造的药物构成严重的公共卫生风险。搜索引擎提供商已经开始将生成式人工智能(AI)集成到搜索引擎界面中,它可以通过用户友好的体验提供更个性化的结果来彻底改变搜索。然而,这些新技术的不当整合会带来潜在风险,并可能会无意中将用户引向非法供应商,从而进一步加剧非法在线药房带来的风险。
    目标:生成AI集成在重塑搜索引擎结果中的作用,特别是与网上药店有关的,尚未研究。我们的目标是确定,确定患病率,并在AI生成的搜索结果和建议中描述非法的在线药房建议。
    方法:我们从Google的搜索生成体验(SGE)和MicrosoftBing的聊天中对AI生成的建议进行了比较评估,专注于代表多种治疗类别的流行和知名药物,包括受控物质。网站被单独检查以确定合法性,通过与全国药房委员会协会和LegitScript数据库的交叉引用,确定了已知的非法供应商。
    结果:在AI生成的搜索结果中推荐的262个网站中,47.33%(124/262)属于活跃的网上药店,31.29%(82/262)导致合法。然而,19.04%(24/126)的BingChat和13.23%(18/136)的GoogleSGE建议将用户引向非法供应商,包括受控物质。非法药房的比例因药物和搜索引擎而异。搜索引擎之间非法网站的分布存在显着差异。与GoogleSGE(6/92,6%)相比,BingChat(21/86,24%)中导致非法在线药店销售处方药的链接患病率明显更高(P=.001)。关于受控物质的建议,Google提出的建议导致流氓卖家的数量(12/44,27%;P=0.02)明显高于必应(3/40,7%)。
    结论:虽然将生成AI集成到搜索引擎中具有很好的潜力,这也带来了巨大的风险。这是第一项研究,揭示了这些平台中的漏洞,同时强调了与无意中推广非法药房相关的潜在公共卫生影响。我们发现AI生成的建议中有一个令人担忧的比例导致了非法的网上药店,这不仅可能会增加他们的交通,还会进一步加剧现有的公共卫生风险。在生成搜索中迫切需要严格的监督和适当的保障措施,以减轻消费者风险。确保积极引导用户到经过验证的药房,并优先考虑合法来源,同时将非法供应商排除在推荐之外。
    BACKGROUND: The online pharmacy market is growing, with legitimate online pharmacies offering advantages such as convenience and accessibility. However, this increased demand has attracted malicious actors into this space, leading to the proliferation of illegal vendors that use deceptive techniques to rank higher in search results and pose serious public health risks by dispensing substandard or falsified medicines. Search engine providers have started integrating generative artificial intelligence (AI) into search engine interfaces, which could revolutionize search by delivering more personalized results through a user-friendly experience. However, improper integration of these new technologies carries potential risks and could further exacerbate the risks posed by illicit online pharmacies by inadvertently directing users to illegal vendors.
    OBJECTIVE: The role of generative AI integration in reshaping search engine results, particularly related to online pharmacies, has not yet been studied. Our objective was to identify, determine the prevalence of, and characterize illegal online pharmacy recommendations within the AI-generated search results and recommendations.
    METHODS: We conducted a comparative assessment of AI-generated recommendations from Google\'s Search Generative Experience (SGE) and Microsoft Bing\'s Chat, focusing on popular and well-known medicines representing multiple therapeutic categories including controlled substances. Websites were individually examined to determine legitimacy, and known illegal vendors were identified by cross-referencing with the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy and LegitScript databases.
    RESULTS: Of the 262 websites recommended in the AI-generated search results, 47.33% (124/262) belonged to active online pharmacies, with 31.29% (82/262) leading to legitimate ones. However, 19.04% (24/126) of Bing Chat\'s and 13.23% (18/136) of Google SGE\'s recommendations directed users to illegal vendors, including for controlled substances. The proportion of illegal pharmacies varied by drug and search engine. A significant difference was observed in the distribution of illegal websites between search engines. The prevalence of links leading to illegal online pharmacies selling prescription medications was significantly higher (P=.001) in Bing Chat (21/86, 24%) compared to Google SGE (6/92, 6%). Regarding the suggestions for controlled substances, suggestions generated by Google led to a significantly higher number of rogue sellers (12/44, 27%; P=.02) compared to Bing (3/40, 7%).
    CONCLUSIONS: While the integration of generative AI into search engines offers promising potential, it also poses significant risks. This is the first study to shed light on the vulnerabilities within these platforms while highlighting the potential public health implications associated with their inadvertent promotion of illegal pharmacies. We found a concerning proportion of AI-generated recommendations that led to illegal online pharmacies, which could not only potentially increase their traffic but also further exacerbate existing public health risks. Rigorous oversight and proper safeguards are urgently needed in generative search to mitigate consumer risks, making sure to actively guide users to verified pharmacies and prioritize legitimate sources while excluding illegal vendors from recommendations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    ABSTRACTLarge语言模型是ChatGPT等界面中使用的基本技术,并有望改变人们访问和理解健康信息的方式。吸收和投资的速度表明,这些将是变革性的技术,但目前尚不清楚这对健康沟通可能有什么影响。在这个观点中,我们利用有关采用新信息技术的研究,专注于大型语言模型等生成人工智能(AI)工具可能改变健康信息产生方式的方式,人们看到的健康信息,营销和错误信息如何与证据混合在一起,以及人们所信任的。我们得出的结论是,必须仔细考虑这一领域的透明度和可解释性,以避免意想不到的后果。
    ABSTRACTLarge language models are fundamental technologies used in interfaces like ChatGPT and are poised to change the way people access and make sense of health information. The speed of uptake and investment suggests that these will be transformative technologies, but it is not yet clear what the implications might be for health communications. In this viewpoint, we draw on research about the adoption of new information technologies to focus on the ways that generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools like large language models might change how health information is produced, what health information people see, how marketing and misinformation might be mixed with evidence, and what people trust. We conclude that transparency and explainability in this space must be carefully considered to avoid unanticipated consequences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文讨论了发现的概念,旨在作为内容发现,并在开放科学的新背景下定义了它,专注于社会科学和人文科学(SSH)。从谷歌学者的例子开始,作者表明,这种完善的服务不能满足当前的需求,实践,和各种各样的发现。在技术选择方面的替代方案,特点,和治理,然而,确实存在,提供更丰富,更开放的发现。本文特别介绍了H2020项目TRIPLE(通过关联跨学科探索的创新实践进行转化研究)的实施和研究工作。致力于构建SSH的发现平台,该项目旨在解决这一领域发现的特殊性和演变。诸如GoogleScholar之类的流行学术资源平台通过仅关注出版物来限制发现,通过他们的算法被引用的论文,英文内容,和特定学科的资源。在跨学科和协作开放科学的背景下存在限制,这样的服务更具体地阻碍了SSH中的发现。以支离破碎的景观为特征,各种各样的语言,数据类型,和输出,SSH中的研究需要充分利用发现潜力的服务。此外,在TRIPLE项目中进行的一项调查显示,大多数SSH研究人员使用GoogleScholar作为他们的起点,他们认识到他们对这个系统缺乏控制。除了功能和内容的扩展之外,透明度是建设真正为研究界服务的开放基础设施的另一个重要标准。鉴于此,我们详细介绍了GoTriple平台,它利用今天的技术潜力,并结合了最知名的功能,以揭示更多和创新的学术产出,并导致国际和跨学科研究项目合作。
    This essay discusses the concept of discovery, intended as content discovery, and defines it in the new context of Open Science, with a focus on Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH). Starting from the example of Google Scholar, the authors show that this well established service does not address the current needs, practices, and variety of discovery. Alternatives in terms of technical choices, features, and governance, do however exist, offering richer and more open discovery. The paper presents in particular the implementations and research work of the H2020 project TRIPLE (Transforming Research through Innovative Practices for Linked Interdisciplinary Exploration). Dedicated to the building of a discovery platform for the SSH, the project is meant to address the specificities and evolution of discovery in this field.  Prevailing scholarly resource platforms like Google Scholar limit discovery by focussing only on publications, and favouring through their algorithm well-cited papers, English content, and discipline-specific resources. A limitation in the context of cross-disciplinary and collaborative Open Science, such a service more specifically hinders discovery in the SSH. Characterized by a fragmented landscape, a variety of languages, data types, and outputs, research in the SSH requires services that fully exploit discovery potentialities.  Moreover, a survey conducted within the TRIPLE project showed that most SSH researchers use Google Scholar as their starting point, and that they recognise the lack of control they have with this system. Beyond the extension of features and content, transparency is the other important criterion for the building of an Open Infrastructure actually serving the research community. In light of this, we present in some detail the GoTriple platform, which exploits today\'s technological potential and incorporates the best known functionalities in order to unveil more and innovative scholarly outputs and lead to international and interdisciplinary research project collaborations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    交联质谱(XL-MS)广泛应用于蛋白质结构和蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(PPI)的分析。在整个工作流程中,交联剂的利用和交联数据的解释是核心步骤。近年来,交联剂和分析软件的开发主要遵循不可切割交联剂如BS3/DSS和MS可切割交联剂如DSSO的经典模型。尽管这种范式促进了XL-MS领域的成熟度和鲁棒性,它限制了新的交联剂和分析软件的创新和灵活性。这个关键的见解将讨论分类,优势,和现有的数据分析搜索引擎的缺点。以新型铂基金属交联剂为例,讨论了使用现有软件表征交联肽的潜在陷阱。最后,关于发展更灵活的想法,全面,并提出了用户友好的交叉链接器和软件工具。
    Cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) is widely used in the analysis of protein structure and protein-protein interactions (PPIs). Throughout the entire workflow, the utilization of cross-linkers and the interpretation of cross-linking data are the core steps. In recent years, the development of cross-linkers and analytical software mostly follow up on the classical models of non-cleavable cross-linkers such as BS3/DSS and MS-cleavable cross-linkers such as DSSO. Although such a paradigm promotes the maturity and robustness of the XL-MS field, it confines the innovation and flexibility of new cross-linkers and analytical software. This critical insight will discuss the classification, advantages, and disadvantages of existing data analysis search engines. Take the new platinum-based metal cross-linker as an example, potential pitfalls in characterization of cross-linked peptides using existing software are discussed. Finally, ideas on developing more flexible, comprehensive, and user-friendly cross-linkers and software tools are proposed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这篇文章中,我们对瑞士和德国的网络搜索行为进行了比较分析。为了这个目标,我们依赖于网络跟踪数据和调查数据的组合,这些数据在2个月内从德国(n=558)和瑞士(n=563)的用户那里收集。我们发现网络搜索占所有桌面浏览的13%,瑞士的份额高于德国。在超过50%的案例中,用户点击了第一个搜索结果,超过97%的点击是在搜索输出的第一页上进行的。大多数用户在进行搜索时都依赖Google,在不同人口统计组的用户对其他引擎的偏好中观察到一些差异。Further,我们观察到男女网络搜索使用的时间模式的差异,在有关在线信息寻求行为的观察性研究中,标记按性别分列数据的必要性。我们的发现强调了不同国家和人口群体网络搜索行为的背景差异,在检查搜索行为以及网络搜索结果质量对社会和个人的潜在影响时,应考虑这些差异。
    In this article, we conduct a comparative analysis of web search behaviors in Switzerland and Germany. For this aim, we rely on a combination of web tracking data and survey data collected over a period of 2 months from users in Germany (n = 558) and Switzerland (n = 563). We find that web search accounts for 13% of all desktop browsing, with the share being higher in Switzerland than in Germany. In over 50% of cases users clicked on the first search result, with over 97% of all clicks being made on the first page of search outputs. Most users rely on Google when conducting searches, with some differences observed in users\' preferences for other engines across demographic groups. Further, we observe differences in the temporal patterns of web search use between women and men, marking the necessity of disaggregating data by gender in observational studies regarding online information seeking behaviors. Our findings highlight the contextual differences in web search behavior across countries and demographic groups that should be taken into account when examining search behavior and the potential effects of web search result quality on societies and individuals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    搜索引擎查询是不同领域研究的起点,比如健康或政治学。这些研究通常旨在对社会现象做出陈述。然而,研究中使用的查询通常是不系统地创建的,并且与实际的用户行为不符。因此,研究的证据价值必须受到质疑。我们通过开发一种方法(查询采样器)来从商业搜索引擎中采样查询来解决这个问题,使用旨在支持搜索引擎营销的关键词研究工具。这使我们能够生成与给定主题相关的大量查询,并得出有关搜索每个关键字的频率的信息,也就是说,查询量。我们通过两项已发表的研究的查询对我们的方法进行了实证检验,结果表明,查询数量和总搜索量可以大大扩展。我们的方法在寻求使用搜索引擎查询得出有关社会现象的结论的研究中具有广泛的应用。该方法可以灵活地应用于不同的主题,并且实现起来相对简单,因为我们提供了用于查询GoogleAdsAPI的代码。局限性在于,该方法需要对更广泛的主题进行测试,并彻底检查主题漂移的问题以及关键字研究工具提供的紧密变体的作用。
    Search engine queries are the starting point for studies in different fields, such as health or political science. These studies usually aim to make statements about social phenomena. However, the queries used in the studies are often created rather unsystematically and do not correspond to actual user behavior. Therefore, the evidential value of the studies must be questioned. We address this problem by developing an approach (query sampler) to sample queries from commercial search engines, using keyword research tools designed to support search engine marketing. This allows us to generate large numbers of queries related to a given topic and derive information on how often each keyword is searched for, that is, the query volume. We empirically test our approach with queries from two published studies, and the results show that the number of queries and total search volume could be considerably expanded. Our approach has a wide range of applications for studies that seek to draw conclusions about social phenomena using search engine queries. The approach can be applied flexibly to different topics and is relatively straightforward to implement, as we provide the code for querying Google Ads API. Limitations are that the approach needs to be tested with a broader range of topics and thoroughly checked for problems with topic drift and the role of close variants provided by keyword research tools.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    据估计,全世界46%的成年人患有活动性头痛症,据认为,有一部分头痛和偏头痛患者不参加医疗护理,而是选择在家里管理他们的症状。互联网继续作为自我管理的在线健康信息来源,然而,重要的是用户可以理解这些信息。研究表明,大多数在线健康信息的编写水平对于大多数英国人口来说太难理解。这项研究的目的是调查访问前四个搜索引擎的英国互联网用户与头痛和偏头痛有关的在线健康信息的可读性。在每个搜索引擎上搜索“头痛”和“偏头痛”,并选择第一页的结果进行分析。五个经过验证的可读性测试用于分析可读性;Flesch-Kincaid等级,Flesch阅读轻松,GunningFogIndex,Coleman-Liau指数和Gobbledygook指数的简单度量。我们发现,大多数关于偏头痛和头痛的在线健康信息对于英国成年人来说太难阅读了。研究结果强调,需要开展工作,以确保大多数人更容易理解来自更广泛来源的信息,以便个人对头痛和偏头痛的健康寻求和自我管理做出明智的决定。健康信息提供者应将可读性分析纳入其内容设计过程,在他们对条件和治疗的描述中加入更短的句子和更简单的单词。
    An estimated 46% of the worldwide adult population live with an active headache disorder, and it is thought that there is a proportion of headache and migraine sufferers who do not attend for medical care, instead choosing to manage their symptoms at home. The internet continues to act as a source of online health information for self-management, however, it is important that this information can be understood by the user. Research indicates that most health information online is written at a level too difficult for much of the UK population to understand. The aim of this study was to investigate the readability of online health information pertaining to headache and migraine for a UK-based internet user accessing the top four search engines. Searches for \'headache\' and \'migraine\' were performed on each search engine and results from the first page were selected for analysis. Five validated readability tests were used to analyse readability; Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Flesch Reading Ease, Gunning Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index. We found that the majority of online health information about migraine and headache is too difficult for the UK adult population to read. Findings highlight work is required to ensure that information from a wider variety of sources is easier to comprehend for much of the population in order for individuals to make informed decisions about health seeking and self-management of headache and migraine. Health information providers should weave readability analysis into their content design process, incorporating shorter sentences and simpler words in their description of conditions and treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号